Yes, and here we can have rallies, referendums, polls, petitions and so forth in order to try to change that. You can even toke if you want to take the chance on a ranges of sentences to serve before going back home if caught.
There, the woman gets acid thrown in her face, beaten with a rod or rocks or simply killed for the effrontery of not wearing a burka.
Fine, you want to do the history walk-back concerning the US and violent ME Islam? Islamic pirates pillaging US shipping and killing and capturing US civilians while being harbored by local leaders. So, in the case of US and violent ME Islam, they indeed started it.
First you have to understand just what he perceives as evil. Many old Dem KKKr's actually, really, really saw the black man as an evil that needed to be subjugated or at least, resisted. You disagree with his philosophy? You think he's the narrow minded and hateful one? Welcome to the position of USE vis-a-vis the ME. He would have hated you as radical Islam hates America. OBL was a vile mother and I am glad he died for the mass murders (of his own people, when expeditious) he instigated. I am actually having a toast to it.
Your 'questions' weren't. As in either actual questions or physics based. Merely postulations based on nothing but your perceptions. I saw no data presented, only your opinions. An opinion is therefore adequate rebuttal: I've worked with steel my whole life - it can be melted with a hand forge, much less air-drafted jet fuel. I watched the buildings fall in real-time. They fell like the near-top structure had turned soft and then the rest was pounded by tons of debris.
Another opinion free of charge. You're a conspiracy idiot.
No, they only had Saddam, an AQ supporter and mass murderer in his own right. Then, once he bit it, the Iraqi's saw AQ for what it was and ousted them, driving their international political status down to where we have them ensconced further and further into the world's butt-hole of mountainous AF.
"And yes, I understand it's complicated to make that work, but it's the truth."
No. It's your opinion, not the truth. And you say that as an employed physicist, not a freelancer creating his own software.
When I was paid to write software, that software did not belong to me, just as your 'codes' and numerical schemes apparently don't belong to you. When I work on software I want to sell for myself, it's no business of yours if I require payment in currency, chickens or karmic good will. It's my decision. You want to work on physics for the glory, go for it.
But, it does. So, if you're busted, I shall applaud your stance. Until no busts happen, there's no moral superiority in having an open router.
Actually, there's no moral superiority in either stance. It's a personal choice. It isn't altruism if you're trying to pressure everyone into doing something that simply provides an amenity.
"Conservatism is based on a genetic inclination to fear the unknown to an unreasonable degree, and therefore most conservatives are not experimental when it comes to sex or any other aspect of their lives."
Obviously you don't understand genetics. Humans are have few if any 'genetic inclinations'. It's one of our hallmarks.
From your link:
"In reflex tests of 46 political partisans, psychologists found that conservatives were more likely than liberals to be shocked by sudden threat."
An alternate interpretation of their results would be that liberals were too dull to respond. Lot depends on how you frame the results.
One last aside: You're aware there's no actual definition for liberal and conservative, right? This means the paper your link linked to is premised on fantasy, not fact.
Yes, because people who write for a living have hundreds of extra hours to devote to first learning, then finding the location of then fixing a problem, then dealing with the bureaucracy to get the fix installed, reloading the app, and finally, having it do some work-aroundable thing they long ago worked around.
Non analysts/developers/programmers have a right to point out flaws and shortcomings in an application without being told to fix it themselves. It reminds me of the time I posted a bug report on auto-cap and some developer basically said I shouldn't be typing without capitalizing myself. WTF? Don't have a friggin' feature that doesn't work. And by extension, don't do calculations in spreadsheets because the user is perfectly capable of doing math and typing.
Used to be my standard for years. Auto-cap worked perfectly, unlike OO. Multi-document? No problem. Fonts, pdf generation and a few other big problems if you want to publish, though. Had to switch to OO, which is an inferior product, but has options I need.
More to the point, they turned to crap. Multi-file documents are a distinct pain in the gonads. Pagination control is actual torture. When it's easier and faster for me to take a large document and gut the contents so I can retain cross-project style rather than start a new document, there's conceptual problems. I still use OOo, but OOo as a developmental community sucks.
But I will permanently switch to the first one to fix their functionally non-existent auto-caps.
No. In fact, it could well be that Dune inspired the search for math that would yield such a mental construct. Math is a description, not reality itself.
As long as it stays on paper, I agree. As soon as you start trying to prove it in the real world, you contradict yourself.
In order to find the data needed to back up newer hypotheses, billion dollar plus apparatuses are needed which cost millions of dollars a shot to use. It very much matters to me that these hypotheses be of an understandable nature, pointing in a distinct direction of fruits, else it's just a squib for some math guy. Let them buy their own squibs.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, and here we can have rallies, referendums, polls, petitions and so forth in order to try to change that. You can even toke if you want to take the chance on a ranges of sentences to serve before going back home if caught.
There, the woman gets acid thrown in her face, beaten with a rod or rocks or simply killed for the effrontery of not wearing a burka.
You find those situations equivalent?
In both Iraq and Afghanistan, the US military builds infrastructure and schooling. You mean like that?
Problem is, you gotta stop the ass-wipes from blowing shit up.
Just because a known, despotic mass-murderer wound up being executed for his thousands of crimes doesn't mean the trial was a farce.
Thank you,sir. That was a grand nuking of a stupid meme.
Fine, you want to do the history walk-back concerning the US and violent ME Islam? Islamic pirates pillaging US shipping and killing and capturing US civilians while being harbored by local leaders. So, in the case of US and violent ME Islam, they indeed started it.
First you have to understand just what he perceives as evil. Many old Dem KKKr's actually, really, really saw the black man as an evil that needed to be subjugated or at least, resisted. You disagree with his philosophy? You think he's the narrow minded and hateful one? Welcome to the position of USE vis-a-vis the ME. He would have hated you as radical Islam hates America. OBL was a vile mother and I am glad he died for the mass murders (of his own people, when expeditious) he instigated. I am actually having a toast to it.
Your 'questions' weren't. As in either actual questions or physics based. Merely postulations based on nothing but your perceptions. I saw no data presented, only your opinions. An opinion is therefore adequate rebuttal: I've worked with steel my whole life - it can be melted with a hand forge, much less air-drafted jet fuel. I watched the buildings fall in real-time. They fell like the near-top structure had turned soft and then the rest was pounded by tons of debris. Another opinion free of charge. You're a conspiracy idiot.
No, they only had Saddam, an AQ supporter and mass murderer in his own right. Then, once he bit it, the Iraqi's saw AQ for what it was and ousted them, driving their international political status down to where we have them ensconced further and further into the world's butt-hole of mountainous AF.
A real long-term win for AQ.
"And yes, I understand it's complicated to make that work, but it's the truth."
No. It's your opinion, not the truth. And you say that as an employed physicist, not a freelancer creating his own software.
When I was paid to write software, that software did not belong to me, just as your 'codes' and numerical schemes apparently don't belong to you. When I work on software I want to sell for myself, it's no business of yours if I require payment in currency, chickens or karmic good will. It's my decision. You want to work on physics for the glory, go for it.
"That shouldn't happen"
But, it does. So, if you're busted, I shall applaud your stance. Until no busts happen, there's no moral superiority in having an open router.
Actually, there's no moral superiority in either stance. It's a personal choice. It isn't altruism if you're trying to pressure everyone into doing something that simply provides an amenity.
Don't conflate 'the public' with 'the criminals' you've written about.
Tellatubies!! My gods, mind-rot for infants.
That is a crock of shit. I live in the Ozarks, which with Appalachia, constitute friggin' poor. I've also been in Mexico. Huge difference.
"... centers of non-third-world trailer park dwellers known as "cities"
Never mind. I see you simply see rural as same. Self blinded.
I take it then that you agreed with the first hyperbolic statement?
"Conservatism is based on a genetic inclination to fear the unknown to an unreasonable degree, and therefore most conservatives are not experimental when it comes to sex or any other aspect of their lives."
Obviously you don't understand genetics. Humans are have few if any 'genetic inclinations'. It's one of our hallmarks.
From your link:
"In reflex tests of 46 political partisans, psychologists found that conservatives were more likely than liberals to be shocked by sudden threat."
An alternate interpretation of their results would be that liberals were too dull to respond. Lot depends on how you frame the results.
One last aside: You're aware there's no actual definition for liberal and conservative, right? This means the paper your link linked to is premised on fantasy, not fact.
There's more to life than road signs.
But, I don't like Candy Land.
"I doubt..."
Why? Actually improving infra is good.
Yes, because people who write for a living have hundreds of extra hours to devote to first learning, then finding the location of then fixing a problem, then dealing with the bureaucracy to get the fix installed, reloading the app, and finally, having it do some work-aroundable thing they long ago worked around.
Non analysts/developers/programmers have a right to point out flaws and shortcomings in an application without being told to fix it themselves. It reminds me of the time I posted a bug report on auto-cap and some developer basically said I shouldn't be typing without capitalizing myself. WTF? Don't have a friggin' feature that doesn't work. And by extension, don't do calculations in spreadsheets because the user is perfectly capable of doing math and typing.
Used to be my standard for years. Auto-cap worked perfectly, unlike OO. Multi-document? No problem. Fonts, pdf generation and a few other big problems if you want to publish, though. Had to switch to OO, which is an inferior product, but has options I need.
More to the point, they turned to crap. Multi-file documents are a distinct pain in the gonads. Pagination control is actual torture. When it's easier and faster for me to take a large document and gut the contents so I can retain cross-project style rather than start a new document, there's conceptual problems. I still use OOo, but OOo as a developmental community sucks.
But I will permanently switch to the first one to fix their functionally non-existent auto-caps.
You mean to tell me they're the only damned place you can go to and buy software? No? Then you're simply describing a brand store, not a monopoly.
Sarcasm - learn it.
No. In fact, it could well be that Dune inspired the search for math that would yield such a mental construct. Math is a description, not reality itself.
As long as it stays on paper, I agree. As soon as you start trying to prove it in the real world, you contradict yourself.
In order to find the data needed to back up newer hypotheses, billion dollar plus apparatuses are needed which cost millions of dollars a shot to use. It very much matters to me that these hypotheses be of an understandable nature, pointing in a distinct direction of fruits, else it's just a squib for some math guy. Let them buy their own squibs.