Climatologists are not statisticians and when one points out the flaws in their stats they just claim that they're "not climatologists". Not all scientists who can poke holes in a hypothesis are (or need be) in that field.
What they do and what they *tell you* they do can be two entirely different things. This is after all, SlashDot, home of "don't give a shit about the users". You know, Beta, serial posts by favored buddies, etc.
That's hardly nonsense. I understood it with no problem and I'll bet you did too really, so it's not far fetched to expect an actual AI to understand it. If not understood, an intelligent response would have been "What kind of opportunities?" or perhaps "Show how?", seeking clarification. Instead, it simply went wandering down its search paths until it couldn't continue and then spat out whatever.
And moving somewhere else with better job prospects and taking two buses would have worked for him as well but he chose not to do it. He didn't start the story destitute.
It may not be war on the scale of Bosnia but a number of assassinations doesn't support your view. Assassination is a fuck of a lot more than "accountable".
That's what I was thinking. Probably be a relationship killer when she finds out he did it.
Someone... Quickly write a filter and post it free for female use. It simply filters out "Harm de Vries".
Why, so we can interpret anything we see as evidence pro/con? Something that will be so long gone that the information will *at best* be "we think there was one there"? Not worth spending money on.
Nice ambiguous word, that "data". Very IT-centric. Now please describe how Amazon or JC Penny say, divides their products (their data) up a hundred ways and sells each item multiple times. Your definition of "data" is a very small subset of what 'everyone who can code' wants access to I do believe.
Unless it's an open source service, then five more will spring up in it's place. If that text-to-speech service is widely desired, an open source version is guaranteed to spring up eventually.
Which will then have their own twists to the API - and the service will still be down and gone (and probably discarded) in that "eventually" you mention. You didn't solve the problem, you just created an never ending series of speed bumps.
But when coding becomes universal, so will the expectation that websites become accessible to more than just browsers.
Now tell me why, as a designer/owner of a website, I should give a shit if someone wants me to provide something other than the web page I've provided already. No one shopping on Amazon - or reading one of my fables - has any need (and probably much less desire to code) accesses to the data otherwise. Make the argument something more substantial than "Information wants to be free, man."
Slashdot Mirror
Batman was first published in 1939.
"because you can use it for profit" should be "when you use it for profit".
That the AC cannot is exactly why the post was AC.
Climatologists are not statisticians and when one points out the flaws in their stats they just claim that they're "not climatologists". Not all scientists who can poke holes in a hypothesis are (or need be) in that field.
What they do and what they *tell you* they do can be two entirely different things. This is after all, SlashDot, home of "don't give a shit about the users". You know, Beta, serial posts by favored buddies, etc.
Link or lie, AC.
It's a pan-field nerdish thing. Just watch The Big Bang Theory.
Oh yeah they do and with some frequency.
Maybe they just wanted to get the most out of the driver they finally found that works correctly with their peripherals.
That's hardly nonsense. I understood it with no problem and I'll bet you did too really, so it's not far fetched to expect an actual AI to understand it. If not understood, an intelligent response would have been "What kind of opportunities?" or perhaps "Show how?", seeking clarification. Instead, it simply went wandering down its search paths until it couldn't continue and then spat out whatever.
No, it isn't. Your wanting it so doesn't make it fact.
And moving somewhere else with better job prospects and taking two buses would have worked for him as well but he chose not to do it. He didn't start the story destitute.
It may not be war on the scale of Bosnia but a number of assassinations doesn't support your view. Assassination is a fuck of a lot more than "accountable".
That's what I was thinking. Probably be a relationship killer when she finds out he did it.
Someone... Quickly write a filter and post it free for female use. It simply filters out "Harm de Vries".
I love the trolling. AC posts comments then an AC accuses AC of being a GamerGater with no substance. What would be the odds it's the same person?
Started out dry enough (though error laden) to take your post seriously. Good job.
Why, so we can interpret anything we see as evidence pro/con? Something that will be so long gone that the information will *at best* be "we think there was one there"? Not worth spending money on.
Wonderful example of why this won't work. You point out a trivial typo, yet you understood what was meant. An API won't.
Nice ambiguous word, that "data". Very IT-centric. Now please describe how Amazon or JC Penny say, divides their products (their data) up a hundred ways and sells each item multiple times. Your definition of "data" is a very small subset of what 'everyone who can code' wants access to I do believe.
Which will then have their own twists to the API - and the service will still be down and gone (and probably discarded) in that "eventually" you mention. You didn't solve the problem, you just created an never ending series of speed bumps.
Now tell me why, as a designer/owner of a website, I should give a shit if someone wants me to provide something other than the web page I've provided already. No one shopping on Amazon - or reading one of my fables - has any need (and probably much less desire to code) accesses to the data otherwise. Make the argument something more substantial than "Information wants to be free, man."
Massive layoffs followed by massive hires of newer and cheaper people belie that.
Your instructors didn't teach you hex? They sucked. That was Programming 101 back in the day.
Point is, he wasn't wrong.
They should. Many do more work than your average programmer.
Actually, it's a scenario where *you* would feel awkward and think of certain stereotypes. Don't project your insecurities upon the rest of us.
No.
tol.er.ant
Showing willingness to allow the existence of opinions or behavior that one does not necessarily agree with: