Re:And so the cycle of "reform" continues
on
FDA Bans Trans Fat
·
· Score: 1
Big difference is these "mistakes" have the force of law behind them. When it comes to nutrition, we're still rather ignorant and attempts to regulate have much more to do with politics than science.
Nope. My brother and I had to resort to jumping from the 2nd floor porch and shoulder rolling off the bushes down to the sidewalk four feet below that. Still not covert.
... for making a person well-rounded, teachable and educated, but with a particular focus on an area of study.
What it's *for* and what it *does* are two very different things.
but without the general education their long term use to the company could be severely limited.
Because people who haven't dumped massive amounts of money on a degree can't learn after they start working? Hardly. The effects of college are greatly exaggerated.
If you get a major that is "useless", it shouldn't doom you to a fate of crushing debt for the next thirty years.
It doesn't. Taking out large loans to get that useless degree does.
Unless of course, you think that only the wealthy should be able to learn anything about art history...
I have a large collection of art books, have spent many hours pouring over others in libraries and visited a number of museums. No need for college to learn about art history. Only initiative.
That'll be why we are all so laid back and peaceful.
Current times are far below previous history in terms of violence. If you believe otherwise, you're making the mistake of raw numbers as opposed to percentages.
... there is also sufficient evidence to prove they used the meat, bones, and skin for various needs instead of merely killing the animal for sport every time.
Their level of technology required that as did European stone age technology. You might also look up Alfred Jacob Miller's "Driving Herds of Buffalo over a Precipice", 1867. Don't overly romanticize things.
Oh fucking horse shit. Equating a job at Costco with slavery is just retarded. You can always walk off and get another job. Same with cage fights and sports, the participants volunteer, they're not slaves. You have a tiny point with bum fights, but those are illegal, not sanctioned.
No we don't, we know full well it's a fiction. At the distances they watched the fights, the Romans could have easily faked it. They chose not to fake it, we chose to fake it.
Show me the free software you wrote, and we'll talk.
People do charity works in different venues for differing reasons. Don't be so condescending as to think that only those working in specific venues have the right to speak out on the practices in them.
There's nothing wrong with proprietary software as long as it is declared a such and we understand free software is better.
And if the proprietary software is declared as such but is *better than* the free software, that's not OK? Not sure you meant to say what your sentence seems to.
You are correct, math is a tool. It is not however a science, other than an accumulation of knowledge. It is used to further investigate reality, which is science. Math can also be used to describe absolute bullshit as well as reality. When that is done, it's not being used scientifically.
Slashdot Mirror
Big difference is these "mistakes" have the force of law behind them. When it comes to nutrition, we're still rather ignorant and attempts to regulate have much more to do with politics than science.
Nope. My brother and I had to resort to jumping from the 2nd floor porch and shoulder rolling off the bushes down to the sidewalk four feet below that. Still not covert.
Sneaking out of your mom's house without getting caught doesn't qualify as covert.
What it's *for* and what it *does* are two very different things.
Because people who haven't dumped massive amounts of money on a degree can't learn after they start working? Hardly. The effects of college are greatly exaggerated.
You're an asshole. Now, could I have a discussion with someone more intelligent?
To which someone added "With ten lines of commentary to describe what the line does."
And anyone shouting 'noob' is a non-thinker.
Palest white circle.
The faintest dab of yellow.
Ain't no such thing as too many grits.
That last paragraph is one big oxymoron.
Then it is an equal mistake to bitch about its cost and the need to repay it.
It doesn't. Taking out large loans to get that useless degree does.
I have a large collection of art books, have spent many hours pouring over others in libraries and visited a number of museums. No need for college to learn about art history. Only initiative.
Current times are far below previous history in terms of violence. If you believe otherwise, you're making the mistake of raw numbers as opposed to percentages.
Their level of technology required that as did European stone age technology. You might also look up Alfred Jacob Miller's "Driving Herds of Buffalo over a Precipice", 1867. Don't overly romanticize things.
Oh fucking horse shit. Equating a job at Costco with slavery is just retarded. You can always walk off and get another job. Same with cage fights and sports, the participants volunteer, they're not slaves. You have a tiny point with bum fights, but those are illegal, not sanctioned.
No we don't, we know full well it's a fiction. At the distances they watched the fights, the Romans could have easily faked it. They chose not to fake it, we chose to fake it.
So you admit you would murder a sentient being.
The mess, as you admit, was a fallacious filing. That has nothing to do with free software being better.
Do not type and hit a bong simultaneously.
People do charity works in different venues for differing reasons. Don't be so condescending as to think that only those working in specific venues have the right to speak out on the practices in them.
And if the proprietary software is declared as such but is *better than* the free software, that's not OK? Not sure you meant to say what your sentence seems to.
If the user experience is for shit (and yes, lots of software behaves like shit) then you have a problem, but it's not the price.
You are correct, math is a tool. It is not however a science, other than an accumulation of knowledge. It is used to further investigate reality, which is science. Math can also be used to describe absolute bullshit as well as reality. When that is done, it's not being used scientifically.
Fine. Do it on your own dime and file it in the drawer labelled "Things To Do Later".
In other words, instead of a scientific argument, yours is based on current convenience. And a convenience you are simply imagining.
Could you explain that "vast"? It's measure and how you came about it? Seems to be the basis of your convenience.
There's certainly a moral and ethical difference in engaging in it purposefully as opposed to breaking some obscure laws.