So start with your own transparency. Supply us with your details for banking, email, taxation, place of residence, phone numbers and closest relatives. Or are you a fucking criminal with something to hide? It looks like you are, and you do.
I can't recall ever hearing/reading Snowden supporting or complimenting Russia/Putin for privacy. Your comment is wholly irrelevant, in trying to conflate his comments about the US as support for anyone.
Which part of his statement was incorrect? I recall the Guardian being forced to destroy data by GCHQ. With the snoopers charter you are the one who should be supplying a substantiated refutation of his comment. Before you go and make a flippant remark about how I've obviously never been to England, realize you don't know what you are talking about and you're making shit up to fit into your own narrative.
They are giving them away for the same exact reasons the Soviet Union claimed to need them. The lies are the same the scapegoats are whoever is convenient.
They most certainly can listen to the constituents of those states. The fact is they flat out choose to ignore them, and that is an honest statement about the value you bring to a politician.
Ahh I thought he was speaking about the MBP, which still has it. Or if I missed irony, all apologies. Been having a stressful day, my social cues are askew as a result.
Jimmy Carter had a presidency that hasn'tbeen marred by corruption and incompetence. Much of what made Carter look bad was handled by the GOP in trying to make him look weak: Iran/Contra scandal.But to get to the point of power of the POTUS it involves a ton of manipulation and control of most of thepeoples thoughts in the room.
Pete Williams is making the bold claims of: Inside sources.... Not a single politician or even he himself willing to hang his hat on that claim. This is more deflection aliong the lines of: This is just russia trying to make her look bad or the FBNI is trying to play politics. The FBI is reviewing because these were emails that they were not granted access to earlier. That means that information was withheld during the original investigation.
Wikileaks only "leak" what is supplied to them. They are not making stuff up about HRC, and i'm fairly certain if they had equal dirt on Trump. they'd put it out there on a shingle for the world to see. So tell me are you in possession of evidence that Julian Assange has leak information on Trump, that is not being released? Do you feel that Assange has always had a cozy relationship with the GOP too?
Maybe he should have opted for a pangalactic garglebalster; Its effects are similar to "having your brains smashed in by a slice of lemon wrapped round a large gold brick".
The rc/quad would most likely lack sensors accurate enough to record/merge/filter and build accurate results. The onboard FC of most systems, especially DJI aren't powerful enough to process SLAM. Likely you would need to have lidar/pulsed light/projection mapping etc on board with a powerful enough companion PC to do SFM/SLAM or photogrammetry.
Were you at the meeting, or do you have actual evidence of his national security briefing? Prove to us you are telling the truth, but that would make you a whistleblower or a terrorist sympathizer.
I don't know if you're attempting humor here, but that is something particularly sought after. Email which doesn't get sent from an inbox that is connected to by remotely varied IP's is something they are aware of.
From a hardware perspective (which can easily hide/mask mal intent) almost all of the hardware we purchase is difficult to trust. Add in the firmware added by the NSA for things like phones etc, and the saying only trust a source if you see the code. The same applies for hardware. I wish we could have open source hardware in more abundance.
A country level agreement is often met with a request to provide source code for "their safety". CHina demands it when they purchase Citrix Licensing, Russia can demand it when they use it for government purposes. I doubt they would need to hack MS to get their code made available. enough zeros in the order price is more than enough to get what you want. This change besides being a thumbing of the nose to MS also supports alternatives which boost their local economy. This is a move to hurt the US financially and boost their own services.
According to the Intercept they collaborating with the Israeli Government to decide what should be censored. The next time the censorship subject comes up about Facebook it won't be about naked children. Justifying censorship as an algorithmic decision absolves no blame.
She has come to terms with the image and understands the importance of it being published. If she got over it, maybe you can too?
Phan Thi Kim Phuc is an UNESCO Good Will Ambassador and the biography/documentary about her has all proceeds going to the Kim Phúc Foundation, which supports child victims of war. She is hardly asking to be forgotten or for dignity she has been denied. You shouldn't be offended that the the name is what is in the picture. It is awful what she suffered. We should all be ashamed of what happened to her, but not at the name of the photo.
The same AI they used to recognize naked and frightened children, could just as easily fingerprint famous images. (actually it would be simpler). It would be pleasant if people had thicker skins.
This sounds like along winded way to say that no company of any size could have culpability because they're all just doing their job trying to make money. The people affected by such actions are too simple to understand the nuance of why things occur.
There is a fine line between making money and being a corporate sociopath.
(And now for the record, you can find a naked 9yo on Facebook.) Correction you can find an iconic portrait of a 9 YEAR old who had just been napalmed and spent the next 17 months in a hospital getting skin grafts. The photographer Ut took her and the other children to a hospital in Saigon where she luckily survived.
Facebook makes money and has an obligation to their shareholders. Operating at the scale and visibility they do, makes censorship an incredibly powerful tool. If they hadn't just been in the news for more censorship, and then just yesterday for working with Israel to work on what to censor, and now this. You can white wash it all away as shit happens. I think you'll find the news will always be slanted in their interests and not yours. Mistakes happen, censorship is seldom an accident. Algorithm or not someone censoring what you see is never in your interest.
Slashdot Mirror
So start with your own transparency. Supply us with your details for banking, email, taxation, place of residence, phone numbers and closest relatives. Or are you a fucking criminal with something to hide? It looks like you are, and you do.
I can't recall ever hearing/reading Snowden supporting or complimenting Russia/Putin for privacy. Your comment is wholly irrelevant, in trying to conflate his comments about the US as support for anyone.
Which part of his statement was incorrect? I recall the Guardian being forced to destroy data by GCHQ. With the snoopers charter you are the one who should be supplying a substantiated refutation of his comment. Before you go and make a flippant remark about how I've obviously never been to England, realize you don't know what you are talking about and you're making shit up to fit into your own narrative.
They are giving them away for the same exact reasons the Soviet Union claimed to need them. The lies are the same the scapegoats are whoever is convenient.
Why don't you expect the same of any and all websites? In fact, ban ads and cookies altogether.
They most certainly can listen to the constituents of those states. The fact is they flat out choose to ignore them, and that is an honest statement about the value you bring to a politician.
Ahh I thought he was speaking about the MBP, which still has it. Or if I missed irony, all apologies. Been having a stressful day, my social cues are askew as a result.
I've never had this issue with my MBPr 2012. The SD Card is a champ, and has never once caused any issues with reading.
Which specific ports are no longer an option for the recording industry?
Jimmy Carter had a presidency that hasn'tbeen marred by corruption and incompetence. Much of what made Carter look bad was handled by the GOP in trying to make him look weak: Iran /Contra scandal.But to get to the point of power of the POTUS it involves a ton of manipulation and control of most of thepeoples thoughts in the room.
Pete Williams is making the bold claims of: Inside sources.... Not a single politician or even he himself willing to hang his hat on that claim. This is more deflection aliong the lines of: This is just russia trying to make her look bad or the FBNI is trying to play politics. The FBI is reviewing because these were emails that they were not granted access to earlier. That means that information was withheld during the original investigation.
Or their math showed that they had no market, and wanted to cut their losses now.
Wikileaks only "leak" what is supplied to them. They are not making stuff up about HRC, and i'm fairly certain if they had equal dirt on Trump. they'd put it out there on a shingle for the world to see. So tell me are you in possession of evidence that Julian Assange has leak information on Trump, that is not being released? Do you feel that Assange has always had a cozy relationship with the GOP too?
Are the real must haves legit: 10 years experience with Go Programming Language, might weed out the honest applicants.
Maybe he should have opted for a pangalactic garglebalster; Its effects are similar to "having your brains smashed in by a slice of lemon wrapped round a large gold brick".
The rc/quad would most likely lack sensors accurate enough to record/merge/filter and build accurate results. The onboard FC of most systems, especially DJI aren't powerful enough to process SLAM. Likely you would need to have lidar/pulsed light/projection mapping etc on board with a powerful enough companion PC to do SFM/SLAM or photogrammetry.
Were you at the meeting, or do you have actual evidence of his national security briefing? Prove to us you are telling the truth, but that would make you a whistleblower or a terrorist sympathizer.
I don't know if you're attempting humor here, but that is something particularly sought after. Email which doesn't get sent from an inbox that is connected to by remotely varied IP's is something they are aware of.
From a hardware perspective (which can easily hide/mask mal intent) almost all of the hardware we purchase is difficult to trust. Add in the firmware added by the NSA for things like phones etc, and the saying only trust a source if you see the code. The same applies for hardware. I wish we could have open source hardware in more abundance.
A country level agreement is often met with a request to provide source code for "their safety". CHina demands it when they purchase Citrix Licensing, Russia can demand it when they use it for government purposes. I doubt they would need to hack MS to get their code made available. enough zeros in the order price is more than enough to get what you want. This change besides being a thumbing of the nose to MS also supports alternatives which boost their local economy. This is a move to hurt the US financially and boost their own services.
According to the Intercept they collaborating with the Israeli Government to decide what should be censored. The next time the censorship subject comes up about Facebook it won't be about naked children. Justifying censorship as an algorithmic decision absolves no blame.
She has come to terms with the image and understands the importance of it being published. If she got over it, maybe you can too?
Phan Thi Kim Phuc is an UNESCO Good Will Ambassador and the biography/documentary about her has all proceeds going to the Kim Phúc Foundation, which supports child victims of war. She is hardly asking to be forgotten or for dignity she has been denied. You shouldn't be offended that the the name is what is in the picture. It is awful what she suffered. We should all be ashamed of what happened to her, but not at the name of the photo.
The same AI they used to recognize naked and frightened children, could just as easily fingerprint famous images. (actually it would be simpler). It would be pleasant if people had thicker skins.
Once Facebook took the plunge into editing/publishing and curating the news, everything you just said went out the window.
This sounds like along winded way to say that no company of any size could have culpability because they're all just doing their job trying to make money. The people affected by such actions are too simple to understand the nuance of why things occur.
There is a fine line between making money and being a corporate sociopath.
(And now for the record, you can find a naked 9yo on Facebook.) Correction you can find an iconic portrait of a 9 YEAR old who had just been napalmed and spent the next 17 months in a hospital getting skin grafts. The photographer Ut took her and the other children to a hospital in Saigon where she luckily survived.
Facebook makes money and has an obligation to their shareholders. Operating at the scale and visibility they do, makes censorship an incredibly powerful tool. If they hadn't just been in the news for more censorship, and then just yesterday for working with Israel to work on what to censor, and now this. You can white wash it all away as shit happens. I think you'll find the news will always be slanted in their interests and not yours. Mistakes happen, censorship is seldom an accident. Algorithm or not someone censoring what you see is never in your interest.