Slashdot Mirror


English Man Spends 11 Hours Trying To Make Cup of Tea With Wi-Fi Kettle (theguardian.com)

All data specialist Mark Rittman wanted was a cup of tea from his all new Wi-Fi kettle. Little did he know that the thing would take 11 hours for that. The issue, in the case of Rittman was, that the base station was not able to communicate with the kettle itself. According to The Guardian: A key problem seemed to be that Rittman's kettle didn't come with software that would easily allow integration with other devices in his home, including Amazon Echo, which, like Apple's Siri, allows users to tell connected smart devices what to do. So Rittman was trying to build the integration functionality himself. Then, after 11 hours, a breakthrough: the kettle started responding to voice control.

200 comments

  1. The worst part by Shane_Optima · · Score: 5, Funny

    The worst part was the liquid it ended up producing was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea.

    1. Re:The worst part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The worst part was the liquid it ended up producing was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea.

      Unlike tea??? That's preposterous. The English absolutely love their tea. Methinks they'd endure almost anything to be able to have it, too...

    2. Re:The worst part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, that's not the worst part. The worst part is his kettle is now completely pwned and mining bit coins for ISIS.

    3. Re:The worst part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought it was that his kettle unexpectedly transformed into a whale.

    4. Re:The worst part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I like the final tweet of his in the article.

      Well the kettle is back online and responding to voice control, but now we're eating dinner in dark while lights download a firmware update

      This should be the only response ever given when someone tries to sell IoT nonsense.

    5. Re:The worst part by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      Hey Nutrimatic drinks are not all bad. Did you remember your towel?

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    6. Re:The worst part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the worst part is that neither of you got the reference...

    7. Re:The worst part by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      Did you remember your towel?

      The towel was easy. The real question is, did you remember how to get the motherfucking Babel fish from the motherfucking Babel fish dispenser?

    8. Re:The worst part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Was it 100Base-tea?

    9. Re:The worst part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was that his kettle unexpectedly transformed into a whale.

      spppplllTHUDaaattt!

    10. Re: The worst part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, eleventy

    11. Re:The worst part by glenebob · · Score: 1

      No, wireless. 802.11tea.

    12. Re:The worst part by spacepimp · · Score: 1

      Maybe he should have opted for a pangalactic garglebalster; Its effects are similar to "having your brains smashed in by a slice of lemon wrapped round a large gold brick".

    13. Re:The worst part by wbr1 · · Score: 1
      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    14. Re:The worst part by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's rare to have a first post that can effectively be the last post. Today is the day you win the internet.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    15. Re:The worst part by David_Hart · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought it was that his kettle unexpectedly transformed into a whale.

      Oh No..... Not again.....

    16. Re:The worst part by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Some bot does not get the quote...

    17. Re:The worst part by fluffernutter · · Score: 3, Funny

      More depressing than Marvin.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    18. Re:The worst part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it brought the improbability drive to a halt during the process - where was Marvin?

    19. Re:The worst part by mishehu · · Score: 1

      You think you've got problems? What are you supposed to do if you ARE a manically depressed robot? No, don't even bother answering. I'm 50,000 times more intelligent than you and even I don't know the answer.

    20. Re:The worst part by tomhath · · Score: 4, Funny

      the kettle started responding to voice control.

      And the kettle responded by calling the pot black.

    21. Re:The worst part by chuckugly · · Score: 1

      "I can see by infrared..."

    22. Re:The worst part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the kettle started responding to voice control.

      And the kettle responded by calling the pot black.

      Another example of institutional racism.

    23. Re:The worst part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He should turn in his towel.

    24. Re:The worst part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Can i vote for him for US president? he seems like a good choice given the competition.

    25. Re:The worst part by unixisc · · Score: 1

      That's a completely different kettle of 'fish'

    26. Re:The worst part by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      "how I hate the night"

    27. Re:The worst part by jpfulton · · Score: 2

      The first 100 million years were the worst. The second hundred million years were also the worst. After that I went into a bit of a decline.

    28. Re:The worst part by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      (This was meant to be a somewhat less well known reference. The vulgarity is integral and not gratuitous, by the way.)

    29. Re:The worst part by someoneOtherThanMe · · Score: 1

      Not really. A response when someone tries to sell these newfangled horseless carriages could be:
      "Finally arrived to my mother's... hours late, after buying a pharmacy's worth of strange smelling liquid and improvising spare parts from my clothes. #BerthaBenz"
      Adding a sound card to a PC 25 years ago was quite an adventure as well. I suppose making a phone call on an OpenMoko was similar.

      Technology will mature and stabilize, IF it can actually do something useful.

    30. Re: The worst part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even worse, the whale will be integral to saving humanity in the future, if only we can find a mate for it.

    31. Re: The worst part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think he knows where it is?

    32. Re:The worst part by GungaDan · · Score: 1

      Sure, but it could eventually be worth its weight in precious hamburgers.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    33. Re:The worst part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The worst part is it would take less to boil the tea with wifi if he had had visited a truly busy hotspot area!

    34. Re:The worst part by dfsmith · · Score: 1

      Oh man, my kettle overheated when that happened.

    35. Re:The worst part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or stewed, at least.

      To be fair, in retrospect the pop-up saying "Go stick your head in a pig" should have been a bit of a give-away.

    36. Re:The worst part by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      He would surely be an improvement over the current field. The four top options are terrible choices. I don't know anything about the rest though, I guess others saw the same issue as me and decided to run, but the 200 others have like 0 chance.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  2. Wi-Fi Kettle Kan't Konnect by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Probably interference from the Bluetooth Pot

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  3. This is why I'm no longer in tech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We passed the point of "useful" and onto "making pointless shit then trying to get people to buy it".

    Engineers, who value rationality, increasingly use the get-out clause of any bright man in a broken system that has overreached itself - just following (employers') orders - to evade the fact that their work is pointless junk.

    1. Re:This is why I'm no longer in tech. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Actually, Being able to tell my kettle to start heating as soon as I wake up would be useful.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re:This is why I'm no longer in tech. by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      to evade the fact that their work is pointless junk

      I would say in this case, embraced the fact. Honestly if I said no to all pointless junk excreted by marketing, I'd be out of a job (for multiple reasons, perhaps). The trick is to say no often enough to stop a new pet rock, but not so often it looks like laziness. Unfortunately when you work for a company that hires particularly dumb marketing bots, the bar falls rather low...

    3. Re:This is why I'm no longer in tech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mine can do that - I press a button on it to tell it when I'm awake.

    4. Re:This is why I'm no longer in tech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Command economies work so much better (guess what, they don't work well at all). The individual consumer decides what is pointless.

    5. Re:This is why I'm no longer in tech. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      That's cool, you keep it on your bedstand?

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    6. Re: This is why I'm no longer in tech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you set a timer. This has been a thing for atleast 20 years now.

    7. Re:This is why I'm no longer in tech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Command economies work so much better (guess what, they don't work well at all)."

      So Apollo didn't work so well?

    8. Re:This is why I'm no longer in tech. by fendragon · · Score: 1

      We passed the point of "useful" and onto "making pointless shit then trying to get people to buy it".

      Much of the world's economy has been based on that principle for decades.
      (for quite plausible values of "useful" and "pointless")

    9. Re: This is why I'm no longer in tech. by glenebob · · Score: 1

      That's brilliant, if you're somehow inhuman enough to roll out of bed at exactly the same time every morning. I want my coffee maker connected to my snooze button.

    10. Re: This is why I'm no longer in tech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you want a 1970s teasmaid?

    11. Re: This is why I'm no longer in tech. by jordanjay29 · · Score: 1

      Well, ya know, if you live in Marvel's Cinematic Universe (incl. Agents of Shield TV show), then you just might be an inhuman who is absolutely prompt.

    12. Re: This is why I'm no longer in tech. by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Ah, but this isn't setting your kettle for when you get up, it's setting your kettle for a fixed time and then also waking up at that time. The time you get up is no longer an independent variable in that system. It's like Ford allowing you to choose any color car you like, as long as you choose black.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    13. Re:This is why I'm no longer in tech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Libertarians are to today's college campuses what Marxists were back in the '60s. Let them have their fun and grow up.

    14. Re: This is why I'm no longer in tech. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      For coffee it's cool to just set the time, because if it sits for some time it's no biggie, but for tea (or if you use a French Press or Aero Press), where the kettle will eventually become cool, and need to be reheated.

      I'm not trying to claim it's some earth shattering breakthrough, but having a kettle of perfect temp water when I walk down stairs is exactly the type of mild convenience I would hope IoT provides 1000 different little ways a day.

      Do I need it? no. Will it mildly improve the quality of my life? yes.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    15. Re: This is why I'm no longer in tech. by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      People do, it's called going to work. Jackass.

    16. Re: This is why I'm no longer in tech. by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      For coffee it's cool to just set the time, because if it sits for some time it's no biggie, but for tea (or if you use a French Press or Aero Press), where the kettle will eventually become cool, and need to be reheated.

      I'm not trying to claim it's some earth shattering breakthrough, but having a kettle of perfect temp water when I walk down stairs is exactly the type of mild convenience I would hope IoT provides 1000 different little ways a day.

      Do I need it? no. Will it mildly improve the quality of my life? yes.

      my parents have that without the "smarts" a coffee maker that goes of at the time you set and has a vacuum thermos for the carafe. keeps the coffee hot untill you wake up

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    17. Re: This is why I'm no longer in tech. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's a solved issue for a drip coffee maker, I still don't think it handles the instance of a kettle.

      Though, maybe a drip coffee maker with no grounds would be a good way to achieve the result of correct temperature hot water when I walk downstairs.

      I'd rather have smart lights (or a second switch next to my bed), but I can definitely see a (small) value in being able to tell my kettle when to start from any room in the house. Especially the bedroom.

      It'd mean coffee four minutes earlier in the morning.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    18. Re: This is why I'm no longer in tech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A normal kettle takes 45 seconds to boil a liter of water, yet we're debating how to add WiFi to a fucking KETTLE so we don't have to wait that long.

      What the fuck is wrong with us?

    19. Re: This is why I'm no longer in tech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A normal kettle takes about 45 seconds to boil a liter of water, yet we're debating how to add WiFi to a fucking KETTLE so we don't have to wait that long.
      What the fuck is wrong with us?

    20. Re: This is why I'm no longer in tech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a Goblin Teasmaid. It only half worked - woke me with the tea but never the goblin. Most disappointing.

    21. Re: This is why I'm no longer in tech. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      And we're not even getting the enriching experience of reverse engineering the kettle to make it work with an Echo.

      Clearly a lot.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    22. Re:This is why I'm no longer in tech. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Has nothing to do with wifi though. The only reason to have wifi is if you're a hipster dork.

    23. Re: This is why I'm no longer in tech. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      And if the wi-fi doesn't work, a sane machine would at least have a power button to turn it on manually. Wi-fi only though is a silly idea.

    24. Re: This is why I'm no longer in tech. by yuriklastalov · · Score: 1

      It's going to get worse, just wait until these same dumb assholes are putting AI in everything.

      The tech industry is dead set on infantilizing the entire human race so they can make a few more bucks. Even when no one really wants their shit they push it anyway.

      Once the computers are doing all of our thinking for us, what's the use for humanity?

    25. Re: This is why I'm no longer in tech. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      A normal kettle takes about 45 seconds to boil a liter of water, yet we're debating how to add WiFi to a fucking KETTLE so we don't have to wait that long.
      What the fuck is wrong with us?

      This was in the UK, where the voltage is twice as high, so the power (P=V^2/R) is four times as big. Actually it's a little less than that, but the kettles do boil faster than in the USA.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    26. Re: This is why I'm no longer in tech. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      There was no power button?!

      that's just idiotic

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    27. Re: This is why I'm no longer in tech. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Either that or this guy was stubborn and insisted that the wi-fi turn it on even though it took 11 hours.

    28. Re: This is why I'm no longer in tech. by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      That's brilliant, if you're somehow inhuman enough to roll out of bed at exactly the same time every morning. I want my coffee maker connected to my snooze button.

      The snooze button is what encourages me to get up too late to be on-time to work. The coffee maker, not be located in the bedroom gets me up at the right time regardless of what ill-advised actions I might make when groggy at 7am.

    29. Re: This is why I'm no longer in tech. by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      A normal kettle takes 45 seconds to boil a liter of water

      45 seconds??? What sort of super-kettle are you using?

    30. Re: This is why I'm no longer in tech. by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      At least according to the summary, he was trying to build functionality that it didn't come with to integrate it with his Amazon Echo voice-control. That's probably why it took so long.

    31. Re: This is why I'm no longer in tech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A standard Electric kettle is around 2 kW. One litre of water requires 4.18*1000*(100-20) joules to bring from 20 degrees C to 100, or 334.4 kJ. The kettle will output that in 334400/2000 seconds, or 170 seconds. Ergo, he must be using a super kettle or (perhaps MÃre likely) he's not heating a full litre of water in the morning, considering that's way more than what goes in a standard tea mug.

  4. Four words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    THE FUTURE IS STUPID.

    1. Re:Four words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The now is stupid.

      I had to hack my coffee maker (Keurig) to have coffee. Twice. First so I could use a refillable pod and again so I could get more than a 6 ounce pour.

      (And my wife wanted the Keurig so now we have a Keurig.)

    2. Re: Four words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the point of a pod was that it was no mess and disposable? It's like complaining that your hammer makes a poor screwdriver.

    3. Re: Four words by plover · · Score: 3, Informative

      Depends on your point of view. If you're a customer, the point of a pod is to make you a cup of coffee. But in Keurig's eyes, the point of a pod was never to make coffee, it was always to make a profit on each pod sold.

      However, third parties figured out how to make pods, too, and none of them paid Keurig royalties for doing so. This upset Keurig greatly. So they came out with Keurig 2.0, with a built-in Genuine Keurig Pod Detector (an LED and photo transistor that detects Keurig's invisible ink printed on the pod's foil top.) This invisible ink thwarted the evil third parties pods by reporting to the coffee maker's owner that "no valid Keurig pod was detected". This of course made all the coffee drinkers go back to buying Genuine Keurig Pods, making Keurig profits go up again.

      Except it didn't. The day after they came out, enterprising coffee drinkers figured out this nonsense and simply taped an old Keurig label onto the detector, and continued using their third party pods. Some third party pod makers provided a free clip-on reflector printed with the invisible ink that fit over the detector. And all the blogs were atwitter with the Evil that Keurig had wrought with Keurig 2.0. The demise of the company was predicted, buckets of tar and feathers were gathered, and the peasants grabbed their pitchforks and torches.

      Except that didn't happen either. Most people got on with their morning coffee, Keurig looked stupid for a while, and the whole tempest in a teapot blew over.

      --
      John
    4. Re: Four words by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Except it didn't. The day after they came out, enterprising coffee drinkers figured out this nonsense and simply taped an old Keurig label onto the detector, and continued using their third party pods. Some third party pod makers provided a free clip-on reflector printed with the invisible ink that fit over the detector. And all the blogs were atwitter with the Evil that Keurig had wrought with Keurig 2.0. The demise of the company was predicted, buckets of tar and feathers were gathered, and the peasants grabbed their pitchforks and torches.

      You're skipping one step there: Keurig customers complained about the DRM that came with the Keurig 2.0 and Keurig's sales fell (Keurig acknowledged in an earnings call that consumer disappointment over no longer being able to brew their favorite non-Keurig brands or their existing stock of Keurig pods was a prime reason for the 23% sales drop in Keurig coffeemakers). They were also sued by alternate single-serving coffee pod makers for anti-competitive actions. They released a rare "this was a mistake" statement and they brought back the "My K-cup" feature a year later to allow consumers to use their own coffee.

      It's an interesting case because it's an example of a company shifting IP strategies when one form of IP protection fades. The DRM came about because Keurig's patents expired, so they moved from patent protection to DRM and circumvention law.

  5. More accurate headline? by rhazz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Man buys IoT kettle that doesn't have support for Amazon Echo, spends 11 hours coding support, puts lame spin on story because nobody cares.

    1. Re:More accurate headline? by geek · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I kinda care. Its interesting to see the hacks people do to make things work. Granted this isn't as cool as making an iMac into a fish tank but still, kinda neat.

    2. Re:More accurate headline? by gweilo8888 · · Score: 0

      Where are some mod points when I need them? Mod parent up insightful: This is a complete non-story.

    3. Re:More accurate headline? by CODiNE · · Score: 4, Funny

      You must have very thin fish.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    4. Re:More accurate headline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real story here is autism.

    5. Re:More accurate headline? by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Slashdot used to consist entirely of articles like this.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    6. Re:More accurate headline? by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Informative

      Back in the Ancient Times, there were colorful iMacs with cathode ray tube screens.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    7. Re:More accurate headline? by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      And the articles used to explain how they did what they did with particularly clever code snippets highlighted for our amusement/education, and we used to think they were awesome for figuring it out and sharing.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    8. Re:More accurate headline? by chispito · · Score: 2

      Man buys IoT kettle that doesn't have support for Amazon Echo, spends 11 hours coding support, puts lame spin on story because nobody cares.

      To be fair, he didn't spin the story, he just tweeted what he was doing. It isn't his fault that newspapers and the public can't tell the difference between a hacker's project log and an average person struggling with a consumer device.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    9. Re:More accurate headline? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 0

      Its interesting to see the hacks people do to make things work.

      It's a freaking KETTLE! How much do you have to hack it to get it to sit on a stove top and heat water? In the time it took him to hack this piece of crap he could have had dozens of cups of tea. Instead, he wasted 11 hours doing something completely unnecessary because he wanted to take the longest possible route to complete the simplest possible action.

      As I have repeatedly said, this is why analog is still better than digital.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    10. Re:More accurate headline? by MacAndrew · · Score: 1

      Surely UID 27417 (I am humbled) is one of the Old Ones and knew this. Very amusing.

    11. Re:More accurate headline? by mjwx · · Score: 2

      You must have very thin fish.

      Walks into shop and looks at phrase book: "My Mac is full of eels".

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    12. Re:More accurate headline? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You're humbled by 27417 but not by his parent who was called "geek" with 5680?

    13. Re:More accurate headline? by CODiNE · · Score: 2

      How often do I get to troll a 4 digit UID? :)

      *Obligatory rant about the old days of quality slashdot full of petrified Natalie Portman hot grits and penis birds*

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    14. Re: More accurate headline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A STOVETOP?

      What is this, the 1800s?

    15. Re:More accurate headline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't even respond to a 7-digit UID. :-p

    16. Re:More accurate headline? by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      "I still use the hockey puck mouse, very ergonomic"

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    17. Re: More accurate headline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the 1800s they made tea and coffee without wasting 11 hours.

    18. Re:More accurate headline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh lighten up, it was cool, silly, geeky and pointless all at the same time. Plus it gave us an opportunity to take the piss out of IoT - what more do you want?

    19. Re:More accurate headline? by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      Back in the Ancient Times, there were colorful iMacs with cathode ray tube screens.

      People turned Mac Pluses into aquariums 10 years before there was an iMac. And I've seen pictures of televisions turned into aquarium from the 60s.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    20. Re:More accurate headline? by mortonda · · Score: 1

      Well played.

    21. Re: More accurate headline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was lucky. If Kettle was a Linux, he'd need to custom-compile the kernel. Easy 22 hours and still he'd have a frankenmonster knock-off.

    22. Re:More accurate headline? by rhazz · · Score: 1

      I was mostly annoyed because I took the headline literally. I assumed there was some kind of hilarious bug and his kettle wouldn't work and he woke up in the middle of the night to the sound of his kettle whistling. Or something. But no, he just spent 11 hours coding coding support for something. Honestly I really like the idea of voice assistant products and the kind of things that people might do with that, but this article (not the original tweets) just has the lamest spin.

    23. Re:More accurate headline? by rhazz · · Score: 1

      Yep, I agree. The concept is interesting, though the fact that it's a kettle puts it on the lamer side of voice assistant topics, but it really is the article itself that is awful.

    24. Re:More accurate headline? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      How often do I get to troll a 4 digit UID? :)

      *Obligatory rant about the old days of quality slashdot full of petrified Natalie Portman hot grits and penis birds*

      I miss Ogg the open-source caveman. There was usually something informative hidden inside the troll posts.

    25. Re:More accurate headline? by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      I miss the XSS attacks in the comments and vertical fonts.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  6. RFC2324 compliant? by eMilkshake · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Does it correctly implement RFC2324 and respond 418 I'm a teapot when asked to brew coffee?

    1. Re:RFC2324 compliant? by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'd expect it to implement RFC7168. Perhaps he just sent a BREW request for / and didn't inspect the Alternates header on the response.

    2. Re:RFC2324 compliant? by DarthVain · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately the only response it gives is that it is "short and stout"...

    3. Re:RFC2324 compliant? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Would depend on whether RFC2324 was written in Java. If it was, it would brew coffee, even though it's a kettle meant for tea

    4. Re:RFC2324 compliant? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Not technically required by the standard.

      2.3.2 418 I'm a teapot

            Any attempt to brew coffee with a teapot should result in the error
            code "418 I'm a teapot". The resulting entity body MAY be short and
            stout.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:RFC2324 compliant? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Does it correctly implement RFC2324 and respond 418 I'm a teapot when asked to brew coffee?

      It's not a teapot. It's a kettle.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    6. Re:RFC2324 compliant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it correctly implement RFC2324 and respond 418 I'm a teapot when asked to brew coffee?

      No it responds: "Just that? I won't enjoy it"

  7. What. The. Fuck. by jenningsthecat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Seriously? I'm not sure what has me more gobsmacked - the fact that somebody would make a WiFi kettle, or the fact that anybody would actually BUY the fucking thing and burn 11 hours of his life trying to make it work. "Yes, I willingly wasted 11 hours of time, plus however much time I had to work to pay for it, on a kettle, just so I could connect it to the Interwebs! Isn't that cool?"

    Soon we'll be hearing stories about people being DDOS'd and spammed by their own appliances, and I will laugh heartily.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re:What. The. Fuck. by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Right up there with people driving off cliffs who pay attention to their GPS/Google maps, not to the road, and others getting run over while crossing the street staring at the i-Phones in their hands, while the driver is doing the same. What idiot uses something unnecessarily complicated to accomplish a simple task? A Brit, that's what idiot!

    2. Re:What. The. Fuck. by chispito · · Score: 1

      Seriously? I'm not sure what has me more gobsmacked - the fact that somebody would make a WiFi kettle, or the fact that anybody would actually BUY the fucking thing and burn 11 hours of his life trying to make it work.

      Perhaps it was about the journey and not the destination? If you follow the link you'll see that he was using a network scanner and other tactics to coax it into working that suggest his motivation was curiosity. He's not an average consumer, he's a tinkerer/hacker.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    3. Re:What. The. Fuck. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      The idea wasn't to boil a pot of tea. The idea was to get attention. And it worked spectacularly!

      You have to think outside the box on these things. There is a kind of person who LOVES attention and will do what it takes to get it. Sure, everyone likes attention, but these folks feel empty and sad if they're not getting it.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:What. The. Fuck. by glenebob · · Score: 1

      Larry Wall does not approve of your pathetic level of laziness.

    5. Re:What. The. Fuck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? I'm not sure what has me more gobsmacked - the fact that somebody would make a WiFi kettle, or the fact that anybody would actually BUY the fucking thing and burn 11 hours of his life trying to make it work.

      Maybe he is the one that defined the HTTP response code 418 in RFC 2324...

    6. Re:What. The. Fuck. by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      I'd never heard of that - thanks for the chuckle!

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    7. Re: What. The. Fuck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually boiling a mug full in a rapid boil kettle is two minutes at most, so 11 hours is time enough to boil 330 cups, which is nearly four months of tea at three cups s day.

    8. Re:What. The. Fuck. by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it was about the journey and not the destination? If you follow the link you'll see that he was using a network scanner and other tactics to coax it into working that suggest his motivation was curiosity. He's not an average consumer, he's a tinkerer/hacker.

      Good point. I have to wonder, though, if he bought the kettle knowing he was facing a major integration effort, or if he just wanted a cuppa. The article doesn't make that clear.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    9. Re:What. The. Fuck. by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      Soon we'll be hearing stories about people being DDOS'd and spammed by their own appliances, and I will laugh heartily.

      And in other news, talking appliances considered to be part of that new fangled Internet of Things (IoT) declared themselves to be a collective group and now refer to themselves as "Skynet". More news as things develop. Tune in at 11!

      --
      We'll make great pets
    10. Re:What. The. Fuck. by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      The guy should now sell the software he wrote to the kettle's manufacturer at a nice upfront cost and a per kettle fee.

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    11. Re: What. The. Fuck. by WarJolt · · Score: 1

      It should be illegal to ship an Internet connected device that doesn't...

      1. Support secure boot, so that a system won't run not unauthorized software unless a user explicitly overrides it.

      2. Support an authentication method where the device keys can't be copied off the device after the device software has been modified. A modified device shouldn't be granted access to network services without explicit user consent. Can you imagine a modified echo ordering tons of crap to unsuspecting victims?

      This protects consumers.

    12. Re: What. The. Fuck. by Nighttime · · Score: 1

      Three cups a day? Clearly, sir, you underestimate the British capacity for consuming tea.

      --
      I've got a fever and the only prescription is more COBOL.
    13. Re: What. The. Fuck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three cups a day. Funny. What are you, some sort of extreme self-denialist?

    14. Re:What. The. Fuck. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      >The idea wasn't to boil a pot of tea.

      It's never a good idea to boil a pot of tea unless you want a sterile tea pot. Boil the water then add it to the tea pot.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    15. Re: What. The. Fuck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does that matter? If you're a tinkerer and you come across a problem, why does one need to justify the natural impulse to get things to work?

    16. Re: What. The. Fuck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The truly ironic part will be when people get boiled by iot. Will you use that iot bathtub at your hotel room, or remember to stand clear of any robotic Kettles? Only future will tell.

  8. Never ask a hobbyist why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The inevitable question asked IoT tinkerers is : what's the point? Was it worth it? After three weeks of tinkering, and an ugly mess of arduinos, breadboards and wires, Now you can hit the snooze button on your analog clock with wifi, or now you can run ssh on a teletype machine. Why did you do it?

    The answer is usually : to see if I could.

    And I say God bless those nutters.

    1. Re:Never ask a hobbyist why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      IoT isn't a hobbyist movement, though - it's about shovelling low end, consumer crap at you that just happens to have a few relays controlled by an ARM chipset with insecure, buggy, proprietary firmware and a Wifi controller.

    2. Re:Never ask a hobbyist why by green1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well of course it is! Manufacturers discovered a long time ago, that even their cheapest quality stuff lasts too long and people don't buy new ones often enough. By internet enabling them, they can conveniently discontinue the server side support (which usually blocks all local functions as well) any time they need a new revenue boost and force people to buy new ones all over again.

    3. Re:Never ask a hobbyist why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much.
      More precise answer perhaps: Because the manufacturer said I couldn't :)

      I added support to Windows XP for the floppy drive interface tape backups that windows dropped and said it can't do.
      I found the right combination of drivers, took a couple and neither was actually FOR what i was doing, and Windows was fine with my old tape drive.

      THEN I bought a better tape drive, because I WANTED a better tape drive not because MS said it was time to upgrade. :O

    4. Re:Never ask a hobbyist why by neoRUR · · Score: 1

      Yes people have lost that old Hacker attitude to do stuff just to see if they can...

  9. IoTT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Internet of terrible things

  10. complicated setup procedure by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    He took eleven hours to explain the history of the British East India tea company to his kettle?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:complicated setup procedure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he sorted that out in the first hour.

      Then the kettle went on strike when it heard he planned to pour the tea into the cup before the milk. This was only resolved after ten hours when the kettle resigned itself to the fact that now that china is robust enough to take boiling water, there is no strict requirement for this step.

      But it reserves the right to complain -- quite correctly -- that the tea tastes less good this way, whenever the DHCP lease is renewed.

  11. Internet of Shit by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0, Troll

    A key problem seemed to be that Rittman's kettle didn't come with software that would easily allow integration with other devices in his home, including Amazon Echo, which, like Apple's Siri, allows users to tell connected smart devices what to do. So Rittman was trying to build the integration functionality himself. Then, after 11 hours, a breakthrough: the kettle started responding to voice control.

    I have zero sympathy for anyone who buys a Wi-Fi teakettle. Just wanted to get that out of the way.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  12. Where's the love and support? by Tyr07 · · Score: 2

    This is actually really cool and good. Everyone seems to be mocking the wifi teakettle but what they're not realizing is this is the move to home automation expanding and growing. This is a good thing.

    Ever see Star Trek? When Picard went to a replicator and said 'Earl Grey Tea, hot' and poof, tea came out? Well, this is basically what we're trying to recreate, just without the fancy deconstructing and reconstructing things on the atomic level.

    As we automate more things in our lives it leaves us more time to pursue other activities. This is one of the ways civilization is going to advance.

    1. Re:Where's the love and support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the asshats making this crap tried to make a replicator there would only be a clicking-hot crater around the man's house. There's home automation, then there is monkey-code slapped onto a flaming hunk of crap with the blood of children's fingers crusted in the cracks of the assembly which calls home primarily to send you mis-categorized advertisements. This falls into the latter category.

    2. Re:Where's the love and support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tea, Earl Grey, Hot, fuzzbucket. Anyway, you're not trying to recreate that. You're trying to recreate plugging a fucking electric kettle in. You still have the whole needing to add water and tea bits. Congratulations on automating the part of the process that requires the least amount of effort.

    3. Re:Where's the love and support? by Jaime2 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, this product was an example of a "bad thing". Home automation has been stuck in its infancy for thirty years due to each vendor trying to create a locked-in ecosystem instead of focusing on creating better products. Progress will continue at a snails pace until interoperation is improved. If you read the article, one of his problems was trying to connect his new gadget (kettle) to his existing gadget (Amazon Echo).

    4. Re:Where's the love and support? by green1 · · Score: 1

      We used to have standards, now we have patents. One benefits all of mankind for eternity, the other benefits a small group of manufacturers for a very limited time. You can see why society has chosen the one over the other....

    5. Re:Where's the love and support? by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Tea, Earl Grey, Hot, fuzzbucket.

      You would think that with their AI computer system, they could at least store some preferences so that if he asked for Tea, without any other qualifiers, it would just give him his usual. Or since it is supposed to be an AI, ask if it sensed he might want something different.

    6. Re:Where's the love and support? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Ever see Star Trek? When Picard went to a replicator and said 'Earl Grey Tea, hot' and poof, tea came out?

      That has always really annoyed me. Who ever asked for a cold cup of tea?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    7. Re:Where's the love and support? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Ever see Star Trek? When Picard went to a replicator and said 'Earl Grey Tea, hot' and poof, tea came out?

      That has always really annoyed me. Who ever asked for a cold cup of tea?

      From the Star Trek: The Next Generation series finale:

      PICARD: I know how it sounds but it happened. It was real. I was there, back on board the Enterprise.
      JESSEL: (cod English housekeeper) How do you like your tea?
      PICARD: Tea? Earl Grey. Hot.
      JESSEL: (annoyed) Course it's hot. What do you want in it?
      PICARD: Nothing.

  13. Wrong tool for the job by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Shouldda got a Galaxy Note 7. Heats up shit quick.

    1. Re:Wrong tool for the job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That could spark a revolution in tea

  14. Call me crazy... by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 1

    ... I would have gone and bought another kettle and then spent those 11 hours on some other pursuit.

  15. Must have been trying to make a proper cup of tea by Justt+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    It is a bit involved. try here

  16. Terrible headline by swillden · · Score: 1

    It didn't take him 11 hours of trying to randomly get it to work, it took 11 hours of complex system integration effort to make something do something it didn't already do. Duh. I spent at least that much time on enabling remote control of my garage door from my Android phone. That doesn't mean it takes me hours to close or open my door from my phone; it takes seconds, at most. But making it work took hours... so that I could do it in seconds from my phone.

    Hmm. Clearly I need to figure out how to integrate with Google Assistant so I can do it by voice...

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  17. WTH? by e432776 · · Score: 1

    I thought he was trying to use WiFi EMF to heat water! Disappointed.

  18. WHY DO WE NEED WIFI TEAKETTLES!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Rhetorical question, because we do not need them at all! The so-called 'Internet of Things' is about as pants-on-head retarded as possible.

    Fill up your entire life with more overpriced toys that are too complicated for what their purpose is so they can break (or be bricked!) and complicate your life unncessarily even further!

    Flint, Michigan must not be the only city in the country with lead water pipes, it must be everywhere, and everyone is now suffering from extreme mental retardation, for this 'IoT' crap to have proliferated even as much as it has.

  19. Walk before you can run by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    A key problem seemed to be that Rittmanâ(TM)s kettle didnâ(TM)t come with software that would easily allow integration with other devices in his home, including Amazon Echo, which, like Appleâ(TM)s Siri, allows users to tell connected smart devices what to do.

    So Rittman was trying to build the integration functionality himself.

    Yeah... I think I see your problem. Perhaps get it to work before trying to do anything clever.

    1. Re:Walk before you can run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah.. I think you missed the entire point.

      The clever part WAS getting it to integrate with other devices in his home.

    2. Re:Walk before you can run by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Getting something to do something it's not designed to do takes time. I'm not sure why this is in any way remarkable.

  20. Tea for my phone by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    Unless the WiFi kettle can turn my phone, or wifi PC into a tea dispensing entity, I don't want it. It would be nice to have a tea button on my phone that pours freshly brewed tea out the headphone jack... ... obviously this wouldn't work with an iPhone.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Tea for my phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could back with apple iphone 6. Iphone 7 doesn't have an earphone jack so the tea comes out of the bluetooth earbuds. Messy and painful.

  21. It's a semantic problem by TheSouthernDandy · · Score: 1

    It just didn't have the right list of synonyms to parse the command "HEAT F*CKING WATER YOU WORTHLESS PIECE OF SH*T!!!"

    1. Re:It's a semantic problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was it made by Sony? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOgwQZd9eDc

    2. Re:It's a semantic problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not. The correct command is, "Tea, Earl Grey, hot," you insensitive clod!

  22. Fake story by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    This is more hidden marketing for the Amazon Echo. Just stop it. No one wants to buy the Echo.

    1. Re:Fake story by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      "Everything was incompatible, nothing worked, and it took forever to setup" is marketing for Echo?

      Is this some kind of new scheme where marketing companies pay not to have "advertisement" like this posted?

    2. Re:Fake story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you're describing RetroArch. That thing is not worth the effort.

    3. Re:Fake story by dfsmith · · Score: 1

      Don't laugh, but that kind of advertisement would immediately pique my interest.

  23. I hacked him... by ripvlan · · Score: 1

    ....his kettle will produce coffee tomorrow morning.

  24. they'll never sell... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    To paraphrase Thomas J Watson "I think there is a world market for about twenty Saturn rockets."
    And that's not just counting the Saturn Vs.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:they'll never sell... by Bromrrrrr · · Score: 1

      To paraphrase Thomas J Watson "I think there is a world market for about twenty Saturn rockets." And that's not just counting the Saturn Vs.

      Unimaginative.....If only they'd have kept building them, through economies of scale, we'd have a Saturn rocket in every household appliance by now.

      --

      What a rotten party, have we run out of beer or something?
    2. Re:they'll never sell... by plover · · Score: 2

      To paraphrase Thomas J Watson "I think there is a world market for about twenty Saturn rockets."

      And that's not just counting the Saturn Vs.

      Unimaginative.....If only they'd have kept building them, through economies of scale, we'd have a Saturn rocket in every household appliance by now.

      Those F1 motors should heat that kettle up right quick.

      --
      John
    3. Re:they'll never sell... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      To paraphrase Thomas J Watson "I think there is a world market for about twenty Saturn rockets." And that's not just counting the Saturn Vs.

      Unimaginative.....If only they'd have kept building them, through economies of scale, we'd have a Saturn rocket in every household appliance by now.

      I'm sure by leveraging some synergies and optimising their best-of-breed supply chain logistics they'd be giving them away free with cornflakes.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  25. RFC 2324 Compliant? by Yaztromo · · Score: 2

    I suspect the problem is that the kettle is RFC 2324 compliant, and was returning a 418 error.

    No worries -- I hear they're working on a firmware update to make the kettle RFC 7168 compliant, which should make integration much easier.

    Yaz

  26. Why WIFI waves? by zifn4b · · Score: 1

    You don't hit a nail with a screwdriver. Microwaves, my friend. They work much better for heating up things including food on occasion.

    --
    We'll make great pets
  27. Re:Where's the love and support? Where's the tea? by petes_PoV · · Score: 1

    this is the move to home automation expanding and growing

    It's not home automation at all.

    You still have to go to the kettle, and fill it with water. You still have to stop what you are doing to brew your tea. You still have to find a clean cup to put the tea in.

    REAL home automation would know when you want a drink. It would make it for you. It would deliver it to you (where ever you are in the house) and pick up the dirty cup afterwards, wash it and stack it back in the cupboard.

    This is just being a slave to your gadgets.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  28. From the Guardian's comments by coldsalmon · · Score: 1

    "Sounds like a case of the port not calling the kettle back." Well done, AlabasterCodefy, well done.

  29. XKCD wisdom by MacAndrew · · Score: 1

    Because I haven't seen this posted yet: https://xkcd.com/1319/

  30. iBrew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What an idiot, but then again I am the bigger idiot I spend, 2 month reversing the protocol of the ikettle 2.0 and the smarter coffee interface and wrote a command line wrapper.

    https://github.com/Tristan79/ibrew

  31. No more tea for me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Swedish government has decided that phone system is too expensive to maintain so they are shutting it down outside of the larger communities. I'm loosing my land-line phone and ADSL in the end of November and the 4G coverage here is to shitty to even consider. The phone company suggested that I put up a 30m tall radio mast to get coverage.... Does this mean that I will not get any more tea?

  32. Just because a thing can be done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, do we really need kettles that require WiFi to operate? I can see if it did some things like "Hey! I'm boiling over here!" or "Crap! There's no water in me and I getting ruined!", but not to turn it on.

  33. 90 seconds by meglon · · Score: 1

    in a microwave. 'nuff said.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  34. People are missing the point. by hey! · · Score: 1

    Sure, it sounds ridiculous to spend 11 hours to make a cup of tea, but in the end he obtained tea by solving a more general problem. This opens up entirely new, previously unimagined possibilities. For example now he can tell it to make him a cup of tea when he's physically situated on the other side of the world.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:People are missing the point. by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      ...or while he's on the way home from work, so that there'll be a nice hot cup of tea waiting for him when he walks through the door.

    2. Re:People are missing the point. by hey! · · Score: 1

      It's probably worth noting that with 240 volts you can draw almost 3000 watts off an outlet (2990). If the minimum fill line on your kettle is 0.7 liters you can boil that in about 100 seconds.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:People are missing the point. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      if you've good a hidden element kettle, the minimum fill is about one mug, so under half a litre.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    4. Re:People are missing the point. by unixisc · · Score: 1

      So that it will be ready by the time he gets home from the airport? Given the 11 hrs it took, that's about right

  35. Re:Where's the love and support? Where's the tea? by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 1

    Nice "no true Scotsman" there.

    Oh, and I'm sure the kettle only holds a single cup of tea worth of water, not like they make kettles that heat 1.5L+ water right? I mean that would be insane! you could reboil the water multiple times a day without having to refill it, and whoever heard of THAT?

    When is the last time you have heard about a new technology that just sprang up 100% fully formed and functional? Home automation is still in its infancy, of course it isn't going to do every little niggling thing for you.

    --
    To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
  36. ...and 11 hours after that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...everyone continued to not care and just used a conventional kettle.

    Not everything has to be connected.

  37. Get a Zojirushi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, one of their hybrid water boilers is absolutely perfect for tea, instant coffee, cup noodles, and anything else that can use instant hot water. Absolutely love it, and you don't need half a day to set it up.

  38. Coke machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back before we let the rift-raft onto the network, the network was safe. Putting things on the network was fun and cool. Being able to finger the local coke machine and find out how may drinks and the temperature was fun hack.

    Now all you bunch of dweebs just complain about the IoT and why would anyone want to do anything, just because your little pea brains have no originality.

    ---XYZZY---

    1. Re:Coke machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "rift-raft"?

      You mean "riff raff".

      It did not originate from anything to do with rafts.

  39. No shit -- you have to buy all the OTHER stuff. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    A key problem seemed to be that Rittman's kettle didn't come with software that would easily allow integration with other devices in his home...

    He was expecting interchangeability with third-party devices? Lock-in and proprietary communications is what the IoT is all about!

  40. So, for 11 hours he had no tea... by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

    Did he keep the no tea so he could open the screening door when he had the tea?

    Infocom games had the best graphics. Everything was exactly as I imagined it!

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  41. Someone made a Wifi Shirt on AMazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01MA3P0SB

    Hilarious!!!!!!

  42. No tea for 11 hours by magarity · · Score: 1

    How did he stay awake to work on the thing to get it to make tea to keep him awake in the first place?

  43. I can just imagine how this went by istartedi · · Score: 1

    "Hmmm this is going to take a while" he said. "I'd better start a kettle". He turned on the gas and snapped the grill lighter hastily, as the electric ignition on the stove had not worked in years. This had been at least part of his motive for acquiring the new tech in the first place. "Now I can get to work", he muttered...

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  44. Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Title should read: 'English Twat Spends 11 Hours Trying To Make Cup of Tea With Wi-Fi Kettle'

  45. It still doesn't beat "Hitchhiker ..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you remember Arthur asking a spaceship computer to make a perfect cup of tea?

  46. Never reboil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I don't get about this is what physical or electrical energy it saves? You have to fill the kettle still?

    Never boil more water than you need. And never reboil water if you want your tea to be good.

  47. Ob. Hitchhiker's Guide... by zorro-z · · Score: 1

    And yet, the final result was still better than the substance that was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea that he could have gotten from a Sirius Cybernetics synthesizer.

    --
    -Z
  48. He did it wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All he had to do was say "sudo make me a cup of tea".

    Which would simultaneously make 12 million cups of tea in the U.K.....

  49. Re:Where's the love and support? Where's the tea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reboiling makes worse tea. Fact.

  50. Re:Where's the love and support? Where's the tea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And, for that matter, reboiling is _very_ expensive. Electricity is the most pricey way to boil water.

    Electric kettles are quick, but not at all cheap to run. Boiling a huge amount of water you don't immediately need, only to use a tiny amount and reboil the rest later, is a lot of why people in the UK complain about their electricity bills.

    A smart wifi kettle would, instead, fill itself precisely for the amount needed, from a cold water supply.

  51. Re:Where's the love and support? Where's the tea? by Cederic · · Score: 1

    Which is why the intelligent tea drinker has a boiling water tap installed, that produces hot water on demand with no delay and no waste.

    To be fair it's probably a little less efficient than a kettle, but only if you assume that all of the water in a kettle will be immediately used.

  52. Re:Where's the love and support? Where's the tea? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    It's a waste of energy and time to boil a full kettle when you only need a cup.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  53. Pro Tip: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Configure your router to whitelist and assign IP addresses to all known wireless devices on your network starting with a reasonably high number like x.x.x.50, if you do that you will never run into issues like the idiot in the article did with not being able to connect to his wireless device. This also solves wireless printer problems.