Slashdot Mirror


Vladimir Putin Is Replacing Microsoft Programs With Domestic Software (bloomberg.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg: Moscow city will replace Microsoft Corp. programs with domestic software on thousands of computers in answer to President Vladimir Putin's call for Russia's authorities to reduce dependence on foreign technology amid tensions with the U.S. and Europe. The city will initially replace Microsoft's Exchange Server and Outlook on 6,000 computers with an e-mail system installed by state-run carrier Rostelecom PJSC, Artem Yermolaev, head of information technology for Moscow, told reporters Tuesday. Moscow may expand deployment of the new software, developed by Russia's New Cloud Technologies, to as many as 600,000 computers and servers, and may also consider replacing Windows and Office, Yermolaev said. Putin is urging state entities and local companies to go domestic amid concerns over security and reliability after U.S. firms shut down paid services in Crimea following Russia's 2014 annexation. The plan poses a challenge to the likes of Microsoft, SAP SE and Oracle Corp. in the country's $3 billion software market. Adding to pressure, Putin's internet czar German Klimenko wants to raise taxes on U.S. technology companies to help Russian competitors such as Yandex NV and Mail.ru Group Ltd.

277 comments

  1. How a tyrant & dictator by vikingpower · · Score: 2, Interesting

    can unintentionally do the right things: kick Microsoft's, SAP's et al.'s ass.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    1. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vladimir Putin is replacing Obama with Trump.

    2. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Meh. The likes of Schultz, Druncker and Verhofstad only dream of being Putin, and may strive to achieve some of the particular aspects of Putin's rule. Putin actually is Putin.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re: How a tyrant & dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather have none of the above.

    4. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by vikingpower · · Score: 2

      Replying to myself, alas. I see that the trolls and AC Putin/Trump supporters have taken over this thread. This is most unfortunate and wholly unintended.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    5. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So everyone who don't think like you are trolls and/or shills. Right? Wow, these progressives are really open minded! Maybe you are the one who is uninformed. Maybe there are elections in Russia, elections attended by a plethora of international observers. Do international observers can do the same in the "democratic" America?

    6. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by gtall · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Really? Go criticize EU governments by starting a political party. Gee, no problems doing that. Now try the same in Putin's Russia. The ghost of Stalin is alive in Putin.

    7. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Ranbot · · Score: 1

      can unintentionally do the right things: kick Microsoft's, SAP's et al.'s ass.

      ...and after defeating the nefarious Microsoft, SAP's, et al's. the tyrant and dictator would never replace them with software riddled with security loopholes and backdoors they could exploit, right?

      I know it's cool to hate big software companies, but at the very least they have better history of trying to maintain security and privacy than Russia of all places. Be careful who you you side with in this crusade.

    8. Re: How a tyrant & dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe the issue is black or white. I see it as a major international software company that underpins many day to day transactions changing the way their fundamental software works. The long term outcome could be great for all parties, I see little evidence of things going that direction.

    9. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Moheeheeko · · Score: 1

      I call this a win, just means it will be easier for our hackers to get into Russian systems and expose political secrets. As for the business side of it, I seriously doubt Russia paid for any of that software.

    10. Re: How a tyrant & dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be stupid of Russia to roll out software intentionally riddled with security loopholes and backdoors when they know how eager various US and EU agencies are to hack them.

    11. Re: How a tyrant & dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be stupid of Russia to roll out software intentionally riddled with security loopholes and backdoors when they know how eager various US and EU agencies are to hack them.

      Yeah, so? Politicians and authoritarians make stupid decisions all the time. For example they think that if they demand something vigorously enough than can accelerate the delivery date. Not realizing how that date was made, i.e. shortcuts on things you don't see on the screen like security, testing, auditing, etc. Thinking that force of will can override the laws of nature, economics and software engineering.

    12. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by RandomSurfer314 · · Score: 1

      Why did you misspell all names except 'Putin'? Incompetence or your idea of appearing to be witty?

    13. Re: How a tyrant & dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing Russia has some of the best programmers in the world. At least their country will no longer rely on software written by H1B's.

    14. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      I misspelled "Druncker" on purpose because he is. The rest you can put down to laziness or incompetence if you want, but for what we pay into the EU, I have earned the right to spell their names any way I damn well please.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    15. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Meh. The likes of Schultz, Druncker and Verhofstad only dream of being Putin, and may strive to achieve some of the particular aspects of Putin's rule. Putin actually is Putin.

      How the hell did this get modded 'Insightful'? Martin Schulz is a social democrat while Guy Verhofstadt and Jean-Claude Juncker are centre-right. Not exactly the kind of people who spend their days pining for an opportunity to crawl up Vlad Putin's ass. in Europe, an opportunity to crawl up Putin's ass is the wet dream of right wing xenophobes with either borderline or openly Fascist tendencies like Marine Le Pen, Geert Wilders, Nigel Farage, Viktor Orbán, Frauke Petry and their ilk.

    16. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by RandomSurfer314 · · Score: 0

      You're such a moron.

    17. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure criticizing the EU in Russia won't result in much.

    18. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're free to piss off to Russia, wanna-be-Comrade.

    19. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually yes there have been international observers monitoring American elections. http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/usa

      In addition both major political parties tend to have their own monitors at the election stations as well.

    20. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by lalleglad · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is actually not true.
      Putin has said that he likes Trump.
      He didn't say, but it has been implied by experts that it is because Putin thinks that Trump is a foreign state moron that he can control much easier than Clinton.

    21. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by macs4all · · Score: 1

      So everyone who don't think like you are trolls and/or shills. Right?

      You REALLY must be new around here!

    22. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Where did I write about crawling up Putin's arse? I was talking about those people being jealous of Putin's ability to rule more or less absolute, without bothersome voters or national governents to deal with. Given some of the things those guys have said and done, it doesn't take a far stretch of the imagination to believe that.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    23. Re: How a tyrant & dictator by Ranbot · · Score: 1

      I don't believe the issue is black or white.

      Agreed. Nothing is black and white when global business, security, and international politics collide. My comment above was only to provide an alternative view and hopefully provoke more thought than OP's one-sided statement.

    24. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump fans will applaud loudly no matter what he says. If he says he likes Putin, and Putin says he likes Trump, then it's all glorious as far as Trump fans are concerned. They will immediately love Putin without a single memory or care of what happened in the past.

    25. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by lalleglad · · Score: 2

      I don't 'know' what Putin is thinking, but I am also not wearing a tinfoil hat, and I am also thinking that American voters in general aren't stupid, and I think that Putin knows that, too.

      And, as I think myself that Trump is a moron, also in foreign policy, and that Putin would think it is better for him to have Trump in the hot seat than Clinton, I believe it to be true.

      Out of curiosity, why do you say Trump and Hillary? Would it be the same to you to say Donald and Clinton?

    26. Re: How a tyrant & dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it that you live in Russia.

    27. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I mean, really?

      I know MS is slashdot's favourite punching bag, and sure, they deserve it a lot of the time. But while MS's spyware and attitude is consume, consume CONSUME! like all western corps, would you really prefer a Russian sanctioned system where the wrong email is liable to leave you bleeding out in some dark alley somewhere instead?

    28. Re: How a tyrant & dictator by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      What an idiot. Russia, China, Iran,north Korea, AQ, and Isis have all suggested or outright said they want trump to win. Why do you gop/neo-cons/tea+ type simply own up to that. Heck America's kkk and nazi party are big time behind trump as well.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    29. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      I am sure that Putin likes Trump for his American dollars...

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    30. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by johanw · · Score: 1

      To avoid confusing Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton?

    31. Re: How a tyrant & dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not unlike Clinton fans who will also applaud loudly no matter what lies she is spewing at the moment. Not too loud though, she might have a seizure and change lies without a single memory or care of what happened in the past. It's all glorious as far as Clinton fans are concerned.

    32. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by lalleglad · · Score: 1

      Except as something from the past, Bill has nothing to do with this election, so there is actually no reason to bring him in.

    33. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why is everyone who doesn't want a new cold war with Russia a right wing xenophobe? I do not understand. Guy Verhofstadt (who is social liberal btw, thus center left) stood together with Ukrainian fascists and nationalists against a pro Russian president. I know it were not only fascists and nationalists, but I do know that someone with profile like Guy Verhofstadt should not have shown himself on the front lines. I should have simply not been in Ukraine at all nor should he have been giving openly support to some groups in Ukraine. Ukraine is a mess, and the EU can't simply annex it. Ukraine will have even more problems to fights its internal corruption than other Eastern European states.

      Ukraine is not a normal country. It is a diverse country with many nationalities, among who Russians are a large minority. When you look at 20th century history you can see that Crimea for example was placed under Kiev control in the 50's or 60's in the USSR because it was easier to govern. At that time they didn't think that the USSR would implode 30 years later. I can understand why Putin wants the Crimea back. They annexed it in the 18th century and successfully defended it against the Ottomans and the British and French Empires. It probably is a symbolic price for the Russians that was 'given away' by the former communists. And error that had to be corrected. That doesn't mean I support what Putin did, I don't like how he took Crimea with a false referendum. But I do understand his motives, the importance of Crimea for defense and why the average Russian might see this annexation as 'the right thing' to do.

      But what does the West do? They just start another cold war. What does this lead to? Russian donations to destabilizing, populist parties. Without the anti Russian trade blocks, we would have had less problems with those people you seem to hate so much.

      I don't hate the people who are stupid(?), ignorant(?) or just convinced pro Russian (although I do not understand why they would), but I hate the ideas of those parties and I'm fully aware of their connections with Putin. That's why I'm against a new cold war. Not because I'm right wing xenophobe, but because I want to get rid of the feeding ground of this "right wing xenophobism". Just ignore what Putin does and trade with Russian companies directly. Ukraine can be helped, without promising potential EU membership and with respecting Russia's wishes to not invite them in the NATO. I understand why Putin feels threatened when a big European neighbor, enters an anti Russian military organization.

      I'm personally completely depressed by our European leaders who keep on embracing Turkey as a democratic nation that should be allowed in the EU as fast as possible, while Erdogan is not much better than Putin. Both are in my opinion equally bad. I would never vote for a party that is openly against Russia and pro new cold war tactics, while ignoring a maybe bigger threat of the new Ottoman empire. Russia only stood in Berlin to liberate Europe from the Fascists and because they were attacked first. The Ottomans stood in Vienna several times to conquer Europe and bring it under Islamic rule, while they sponsored centuries of white Christian slavery that depopulated vast amounts of coastal areas from Spain over southern France around Italy to the Greek lands. And without any reason but Islamic imperialism.

      No I don't want a cold war with Russia. Just a cool friendly relationship with respect for each other and some criticism that doesn't lead to boycotts when we don't agree on an issue. I want the same relationship with Turkey. Let those countries rule themselves and stop them on your own borders including the financial support from Russia to those 'extreme right' parties. In a cool friendly relationship you can gently ask to stop. In the current cold war this is no longer possible.

    34. Re: How a tyrant & dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how do you call Obama and Bill predecessors ? W and H ?

    35. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, why do you say Trump and Hillary? Would it be the same to you to say Donald and Clinton?

      No.

      Go look at the campaign stickers and such for both candidates. Trump's stickers and signs all say "TRUMP" (or "TRUMP / PENCE"). Hillary's signs all say "Hillary 2016" or similar.

      "Clinton" refers to Bill Clinton, the former president. Hillary herself uses her first name to try to make a name for herself, instead of simply being "Bill Clinton's wife". It's actually a smart move. "Clinton" isn't even her last name, it's "Rodham"; she merely adopted the Clinton name when she married Bill, and honestly, it's an archaic and patriarchal old custom that really has outlived its usefulness IMO, and that's coming from someone who is not a big fan of SJWs, "safe spaces" and all that other crap going on in the far left these days. I'm no fan of Hillary, but if I were a woman politician, I'd also want to make a name for myself on my own merits and accomplishments, not my husband's (though she touts her "experience" of being First Lady way too much IMO which tarnishes this).

    36. Re: How a tyrant & dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah - how are slashdotters so pro hillary after her "hoover up all the information " quote ?

    37. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Then enemy of your enemy is not always your friend you know...

    38. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, why do you say Trump and Hillary? Would it be the same to you to say Donald and Clinton?

      'Clinton' could be confused with Bill, and Hillary is known as Hillary, she even uses that name in her campaign, while Trump uses Trump. So Trump and Hillary seems to be the best fit.

    39. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Except as something from the past, Bill has nothing to do with this election, so there is actually no reason to bring him in.

      Trump has brought him in numerous times during the campaign and Hillary herself prefers to be Hillary rather than Clinton: https://www.hillaryclinton.com...

    40. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call this a win, just means it will be easier for our hackers to get into Russian systems and expose political secrets.

      Depends on who "our hackers" are.
      Hackers working for the US government probably just have to read the provided manual to hack computers with Microsoft software, so now they are going to have to look for backdoors for real.
      For everyone else it might be a bit easier.. maybe.

    41. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Putin have been supporting the far right in several European nations. I wouldn't be surprised if he supported Trump for the same reason.
      It's very easy to get them chanting the "not our problem" mantra when it comes to conflicts in other countries and by nature they want to isolate each country and culture.
      "Build a wall" isn't unique to Trump although racists in Europe tends to opt for the cost effective fence.

      The goal is to get a political climate where it would be possible to grab the former Soviet states without other nations sending support or otherwise intervene.
      When he moves soldiers into the Baltic nations he doesn't want the publicity that he got in Ukraine.

    42. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      You, Sir, are a moron and a drunk parrot.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    43. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Tuan164 · · Score: 1

      I don't think so.

    44. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where did I write about crawling up Putin's arse? I was talking about those people being jealous of Putin's ability to rule more or less absolute, without bothersome voters or national governents to deal with. Given some of the things those guys have said and done, it doesn't take a far stretch of the imagination to believe that.

      You said they wanted to be Putin which basically boils down to the same thing as crawling up his ass. As for the rest of your comment, let's stop imagining and stick to facts. You have to be pretty deluded to accuse a social democrat and two liberal right wingers of being jealous of a megalomaniac dictator who'm all of them have been dismissive of and who is demonstrably an icon of the European far-right xenophobic nationalist movement.

    45. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      As a non-AC regular poster on Slashdot I entirely disagree with your statement.

      Putin is a very smart man managing complex politics in a complex (eastern Europe, middle-East, central-Asia) part of the world.

      Trump is easy to dislike but he has connected very well with a large part of the US.

      Hillary is my logical choice as I'm educated and tolerant and believe in left-ist ideals. However, I believe she is crooked and corrupt to the core and there is no way I can support her.

      So c'mon mate, it's a complex situation and you do yourself a disservice by "name calling" everyone you do not agree with.

    46. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by "dream", you really mean , "nightmare". I couldnt think of a worse person or name to be called than "Putin". Im not an evil blood thirsty tyrant like that wheel tapper. You need to up your ideals there, theyre shockingly low.

    47. Re:How a tyrant & dictator by w1z4rd · · Score: 1

      Nicely said!

  2. So in Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...domestic software replaces YOU, mr. Nadella ?!?

    1. Re:So in Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when OpenOffice and PostgressSQL are domestic for Russia?

  3. This will cost Microsoft a fortune by spywhere · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're going to lose the revenue from both of the Office licenses used by the Russian government...

    1. Re:This will cost Microsoft a fortune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the second one used for?

    2. Re:This will cost Microsoft a fortune by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 2

      I am only aware of this one... gc6j3-gtq62-fp876-94fbr-d3dx8

      Is there another one?

      (Seriously, it's an Office 2000 licence number, I typed it so often, I still remember it...)

    3. Re:This will cost Microsoft a fortune by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, due to a mishap in bureaucracy, accidentally two different offices ordered a license. The responsible official has been relocated to Sibiria for extended education.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:This will cost Microsoft a fortune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am only aware of this one... gc6j3-gtq62-fp876-94fbr-d3dx8

      Is there another one?

      (Seriously, it's an Office 2000 licence number, I typed it so often, I still remember it...)

      Thanks! I can FINALLY get rid of those annoying licence activation dialogs!

    5. Re:This will cost Microsoft a fortune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got one for Windows 10?

    6. Re:This will cost Microsoft a fortune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the late Dr. Hadden used to say about government acquisition: why buy one Office license when you can buy two twice the price?

    7. Re:This will cost Microsoft a fortune by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Do you mean for a copy of Windows 10 that dates from about the year 2000?

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    8. Re:This will cost Microsoft a fortune by behrooz0az · · Score: 1

      anyone else remember the RQ2D3? or remember what this belonged to? 020736-428526-011875-6507
      good old days when no one called home

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
    9. Re:This will cost Microsoft a fortune by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Lemme guess... You remember that number because you had to re-install your machine with Windows ME and Office2000 so many times?

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    10. Re:This will cost Microsoft a fortune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, due to a mishap in bureaucracy, accidentally two different offices ordered a license. The responsible official has been relocated to Sibiria for extended education.

      Why is he getting such lenient treatment? Traditionally people who get sent to Siberia end up as filler in railway track foundations.

    11. Re: This will cost Microsoft a fortune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Implying that anyone in Russia uses legitimate copies of any software

    12. Re:This will cost Microsoft a fortune by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Well, due to a mishap in bureaucracy, accidentally two different offices ordered a license. The responsible official has been relocated to Sibiria for extended education.

      Speaking of which, does anyone know what happened to the guys that Putin ordered about a month ago to decrypt the entire internet in 2 weeks or whatever that was?

    13. Re:This will cost Microsoft a fortune by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Please, that was the barbaric times of the Stalinist era we left behind us. Today we are a modern society where we reeducate people instead of just punishing them.

      Admittedly, sometimes reeducation takes 25 years, especially when we're short on workers in Sibiria.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    14. Re:This will cost Microsoft a fortune by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      They have been relocated to the agriculture department and have now a glorious new career as fertilizer.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:This will cost Microsoft a fortune by losfromla · · Score: 1

      That sounds a lot like our mandatory minimum sentencing laws for drug-related offenses. Who's barbaric now?

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    16. Re:This will cost Microsoft a fortune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a lousy filler once it thaws in the summer.

  4. They'll come crawling back by Guyle · · Score: 5, Funny

    Once the average Russian gets tired of their homegrown software crapping out on them they'll be begging for their Windows 98 workstations back.

    1. Re:They'll come crawling back by houghi · · Score: 2

      They will just reopen the gulags untill it works.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:They'll come crawling back by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      (Assuming Russia is going Linux,) can you tell me which of these came crawling back to Microsoft? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    3. Re:They'll come crawling back by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      The gulags run on Windows 10.

    4. Re:They'll come crawling back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the Wiki reference YOU linked:

      "Switzerland's Canton of Solothurn decided in 2001 to migrate its computers to Linux, but in 2010 the Swiss authority has made a U-turn by deciding to use Windows 7 for desktop clients.[64]"
      And...

      "The French Parliament switched to using Ubuntu on desktop PCs in 2007.[46][47] However, in 2012, it was decided to let each Member of Parliament choose between Windows and Linux.[48]"

    5. Re:They'll come crawling back by LichtSpektren · · Score: 0

      So out of hundreds of successful Linux adoptions, one of them (less than 1%) went back to Windows.

      Sounds like the odds are in Russia's favor then.

    6. Re:They'll come crawling back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has happened many times in many countries. The problem is, they didn't choose Linux because it is superior to Windows, they chose it only because Linux is not a product of an American company.

      There certainly are many good reasons to dislike the U.S. and American companies, but, business decisions made out of spite rarely work out well.

    7. Re:They'll come crawling back by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, the gulag IS Windows 10.

    8. Re:They'll come crawling back by LichtSpektren · · Score: 4, Informative

      This has happened many times in many countries. The problem is, they didn't choose Linux because it is superior to Windows, they chose it only because Linux is not a product of an American company.

      There certainly are many good reasons to dislike the U.S. and American companies, but, business decisions made out of spite rarely work out well.

      Come back when you have any evidence for your claim that the Linux migrations didn't work out well. The millions of dollars that Munich and France and Brazil boast about saving means there's a pretty heft burden of proof.

    9. Re:They'll come crawling back by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

      Only in the Russian Reversal. In the free world, Windows 10 IS the gulag.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:They'll come crawling back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Indeed. However, the GP wanted examples from the article.. I merely supplied them. Your argument is therefore... lame.

    11. Re:They'll come crawling back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Spite?

      It is done because of your government agencies. They have repeatedly stated that they will hack everyone and everything that they want to. Your laws allow them to force companies and private individuals to help them do that through the software and hardware you produce.

      It is insane for any government computer outside the US to still be running american operating systems, networking gear etc. without at least starting a migration plan away. It isn't the 90's any more.

      Any country that wants to protect itself, its data and it's economy needs to clean house and build out whatever they can for themselves. The internet is not going to survive the next 50 years in its current shape, it will segregate or be a war ground that only massive corporations can survive in/on.

    12. Re:They'll come crawling back by Archtech · · Score: 2

      This has happened many times in many countries. The problem is, they didn't choose Linux because it is superior to Windows, they chose it only because Linux is not a product of an American company.

      There certainly are many good reasons to dislike the U.S. and American companies, but, business decisions made out of spite rarely work out well.

      Come back when you have evidence for your claim that "they didn't choose Linux because it is superior to Windows, they chose it only because Linux is not a product of an American company".

      In many cases the decision to switch to FOSS was made on general philosophical grounds. Since as much as possible about the process of government should be transparent, the software used by government should also be available for the citizen to inspect and study - should she wish to do so.

      There were also other general considerations such as avoiding license costs and greatly reducing support costs, and completely cutting out all the expensive and restrictive bureaucracy involved in licence administration.

      Oh, and many people are becoming very wary of the likelihood that American software contains backdoors or other means by which information may be surreptitiously collected, and possibly handed over to US and other government agencies.

      None of those reasons has anything to do with the desire to avoid an American manufacturer, as such.

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    13. Re:They'll come crawling back by toadlife · · Score: 2

      Their software works fine for me. Maybe the problem is you.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    14. Re:They'll come crawling back by loonycyborg · · Score: 0

      How can it be me if MS Office apps tend to crash at regular intervals? I didn't add those crashes, I'm not a contributor to MS Office.

    15. Re:They'll come crawling back by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Microsoft achieved its position by creating and maintaining an illegal monopoly. Rewind to the 1980's. Before Windows. Back when there was this thing called MS-DOS and compatibility with the IBM-PC has become the industry standard for hardware.

      There were other OSes in the early 1980's. Some as good or better than MS-DOS. (You also have to remember how shockingly primitive hardware was back then.)

      But MS-DOS was the big one, because it was like PC-DOS on genuine IBM PCs.

      So Microsoft's deal with OEMs: if you want to sell MS-DOS on your PCs, you must pay Microsoft for an MS-DOS license on every PC you make, whether or not it comes with MS-DOS preinstalled. That instantly made every other OS uncompetitive. If you wanted to buy Brand X, you were also going to pay for MS-DOS no matter what.

      And that was just the start of the evil.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    16. Re:They'll come crawling back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A whole lot more went back to Windows but didn't make an announcement about it in an attempt to preserve face. This especially happens in old communist states like China and Russia. Kernel aside, the Desktop Environments on Linux are really shoddy and don't appeal to the grunts who have to use them day in and day out.

    17. Re:They'll come crawling back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How could they possibly write something WORSE that Outlook/Exchange?

    18. Re:They'll come crawling back by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Name one stock exchange that runs on Windows.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    19. Re:They'll come crawling back by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Err... Exchange was written by The Open Group. The company that owns the UNIX trade mark. Ooops...

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    20. Re:They'll come crawling back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft Exchange?

    21. Re:They'll come crawling back by Archtech · · Score: 2

      So, we have a blanket statement about the situation in many foreign countries, unaccompanied by any citations or sources, and posted by an AC.

      Well, I'm convinced.

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    22. Re:They'll come crawling back by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      I can name one stock exchange that tried to run on Windows and regretted it. (Now happily running on Linux.)

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    23. Re:They'll come crawling back by Tough+Love · · Score: 0

      Their software works fine for me

      Except for when Windows needs reinstall because of malware infestation of reboots in the middle of something important, or...?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    24. Re:They'll come crawling back by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      In soviet Russia Windows 10 controls You!

      Wait why does that not make sense even though it sounds right?

    25. Re: They'll come crawling back by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Uh no. It was not. The open.group did a number of the protocols that exchange use, but MS took those and did their EEE to them.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    26. Re:They'll come crawling back by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Come back when you have any evidence for your claim that the Linux migrations didn't work out well. The millions of dollars that Munich and France and Brazil boast about saving means there's a pretty heft burden of proof.

      Er, shouldn't the burden of proof lie with the one doing the "boasting"?
      I couldn't say either way, but the scratch and sniff test says that if migrating to Linux was a net gain more people would be doing it.

    27. Re:They'll come crawling back by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Their software works fine for me

      Except for when Windows needs reinstall because of malware infestation of reboots in the middle of something important, or...?

      I take it that some Microsoft employee with mod points does not agree that Windws is a malware magnet and reboots at random times. Never used it I guess.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    28. Re:They'll come crawling back by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Their software works fine for me. Maybe the problem is you.

      That's customer service right there. And Linux people wonder why their desktop market share can't break out of the bottom 1%...

    29. Re:They'll come crawling back by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      Name one stock exchange that runs on Windows.

      Or flight control system - they may exist, I just want to know which ones I should avoid flying on.

      Linux - it's not for grunts (which is a bad thing?).

    30. Re:They'll come crawling back by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      Their software works fine for me. Maybe the problem is you.

      That's customer service right there. And Linux people wonder why their desktop market share can't break out of the bottom 1%...

      Most of us don't care about "market share" or bullshit categories like "desktop market share". We just want what we use - phones, servers, routers, micro devices, planes, medical equipment, and even that small category of devices where Linux isn't the overwhelming OS of choice called "desktops" to work the way we want.
      Most people have a phone, use the internet, watch television and use their pad devices far more than "Desktops" (even "Windows" fans who use Linux far more than Windows but are too dumb to realise it). We tend to leave the fan boi "brand loyalty" crap to face painters and other superstitious folk.

      Just because thousand dollar handbags are pretty popular with reality TV stars doesn't mean most people want or use handbags - and if they do, they don't tend to give a fuck about the brand (it's just a tool, fool). Just as most people don't pay much attention to political, geographic, or racial boundaries - it just sounds that way because those that do, have time to make noise about it (except for dem commies - they're all de same - especially the 400lb Ruskie bedsitting "hackers").

    31. Re:They'll come crawling back by Gussington · · Score: 1

      We tend to leave the fan boi "brand loyalty" crap to face painters and other superstitious folk.

      Yet here you are...

    32. Re:They'll come crawling back by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      We tend to leave the fan boi "brand loyalty" crap to face painters and other superstitious folk.

      Yet here you are...

      Clearly comprehension is one of your failings. How hard would it be to look up the meaning of "brand loyalty"? [sigh] and people like you are allowed to vote.

    33. Re:They'll come crawling back by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

      Absolutely nothing can beat Microsoft software at crapping out. They achieved their position with pure marketing and kickbacks. If those advantages are somehow countered there's simply no way Microsoft could be seriously considered for anything.

      Amen. Just yesterday, I had to clean up two Windows 10 machines that "updated" over the prior night and no longer worked correctly. One machine had a network printer that just quit working. The other had a local printer AND a wireless network device which quit working. Every day is a new Windows 10 repair. I get more jobs from making Windows work after updates than I do cleaning up malware anymore.

      Windows 10 users are all beta (or alpha) testers.

    34. Re:They'll come crawling back by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      LOL

    35. Re:They'll come crawling back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite user resistance to Open Office and the like, it really did work pretty well in many Brazilian state agents and companies. The thing is, since then, US companies upped their bribing strategy and all of a sudden software independence wasn't that important anymore.

      I worked for a state company with more then 150 thousand employees, and when we where about to roll out our internal Debian workstation, after months of tailoring it to our biggest use cases, there came Microsoft with some thousand Windows 8 licenses "free" of charge. The big managers where all almost too happy to accept it and scrap the Linux workstation project that costed tens of thousands of man-hours in a matter of weeks. At the same time a third of the employees that were already using an internal Zimbra based mail solution were migrated back to Outlook and the Exchange replacement project was also scrapped.

      No doubt there were some other "gifts" from Microsoft to sweeten the deal with the managers.

      What you hear now from Brazilian state companies is that it's better to have a wealthy contractor to sue when things go wrong, rather than to be on your own. Except I'm yet to see the likes of IBM, Microsoft, Oracle and SAP paying anything up when their services fall short on what was advertised here in Brazil: wealthy contractors deal in bribery and lawyers, not technology.

  5. Come on baby by LichtSpektren · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let it be called KremLinux and all is forgiven!

    1. Re:Come on baby by Pseudonymous+Powers · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let it be called KremLinux and all is forgiven!

      KremLinux is for losers. I'm going with KGBSD.

    2. Re:Come on baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let it be called KremLinux and all is forgiven!

      Too many letters.
      Kremix.

    3. Re:Come on baby by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      That's already taken, Kripsy Kreme UNIX

    4. Re:Come on baby by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 1

      Moderate parent +5 Funny!
      Wish I still had my moderator points...LMAO.

    5. Re: Come on baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seeing Putin in his shirtless avatars, surely KGBSDM?

    6. Re:Come on baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are not keeping up with the times. The latest version is called FSBSD.

    7. Re:Come on baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      introducing MIKOSOFT VODE

    8. Re:Come on baby by TimothyHollins · · Score: 1

      That's the krem de la Kreml of distros.

    9. Re:Come on baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VodakLoonix.

    10. Re:Come on baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are forgetting something. We the Russians already have had KremVAX for years.
      BTW, nobody said the homegrown software will be open source or free or libre or whatever.

    11. Re:Come on baby by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      But will KremLinux run systemd?

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    12. Re:Come on baby by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 2

      Let it be called KremLinux and all is forgiven!

      KremLinux is for losers. I'm going with KGBSD.

      So let me get this straight ... In Putin's Russia, is it KremLinux or KGBSD that watches YOU? ... or is it both? ... I'm confused now ...

    13. Re:Come on baby by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 2

      Got another distro that's way more in depth. it's called KGBDSM.

    14. Re: Come on baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course! It wouldn't be an authoritarian, fascist dictatorship otherwise, would it?

    15. Re:Come on baby by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      Damn it, I came here to post this.

    16. Re:Come on baby by unixisc · · Score: 1

      There is an original AT&T/USL/SCO version, called SVR. So you'd have KremLinux (for Linux), FSBSD (for BSD) and SVR (for SVR4.x)

    17. Re:Come on baby by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Too many letters.
        Kremix.

      That's already taken, Kripsy Kreme UNIX

      Oh, I thought that was KKUX....no wait... that's uh.... probably not right...

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    18. Re:Come on baby by wraithr · · Score: 1

      This one sir is absolutely fantastic!

    19. Re:Come on baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's FSBSD now.

  6. Trans-Pacific Partnership will hurt them then as by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0

    Trans-Pacific Partnership will hurt them then as MS will make them pay per system for some licenses or say you must by a site licenses to use the few windows systems / vm for the stuff that does not run on your os.

  7. Suprise by 110010001000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The only surprise here is that Moscow was using Microsoft software at all. That sounds insane.

    1. Re:Suprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There used to be a thriving 'grey' market in MS software in Moscow. Several times it got me our of a hole when working there in the 1990's.
      I'd take the Metro out to one of the 'Prospects' (Housing estates) and buy what I needed for a fraction of the cost back home.
      Not sure if Putin has cracked down on it these days.

    2. Re:Suprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, they weren't paying.

    3. Re:Suprise by unixisc · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't. All they need to do is have ReactOS fully functional, and all the Windows software that they run will be good for it

  8. Vladimir Putin - tyrant, president, sysadmin by NuclearCat · · Score: 1

    All in one, just great!
    Now he is accused in uninstalling windows and installing Linux?

    1. Re: Vladimir Putin - tyrant, president, sysadmin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Red star OS? I seem to remember that just popping up.

    2. Re:Vladimir Putin - tyrant, president, sysadmin by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Putin - the ultimate BOFH.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    3. Re: Vladimir Putin - tyrant, president, sysadmin by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Well, W already showed what he could do. Why do you keep bringing him up? Or were you thinking of the other yellow belly reagan?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  9. Let me foresee what will happen... by LostMonk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let me foresee what will happen... Putin will replace Microsoft programs with ripped off open-source software with minor UI and major back-doors updates;
    Then, with great patriotic pride, will pronounce the motherland's major step towards cleansing itself from western spying and corruption.

    1. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      still better than microsoft. hope the russians make it open source.

    2. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by noodler · · Score: 1

      So, microsoft software after all?

    3. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They might as well copy Red Star Linux and change the flags from North Korea to Russia. :)

    4. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by guestapoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Base on RT's article, the replacement is MyOffice, a cloud-based, similar to Office 365, running on browsers or as standalone applications for Window, Android, iOS.

    5. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      It may surprise you to know that the Russians can and do write their own original software, some of it quite good. It's actually quite common, because even today support for non-Latin languages in western software can be quite poor. Japan and China also produce their own high quality office software and input translation utilities (for entering their languages using slightly modified QWERTY keyboards).

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by dingleberrie · · Score: 2

      Who knows... maybe they already have all the Microsoft source code.
      There are state sponsored hackers, right?

    7. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      So, in Russia, software spies on YOU?

      Uh... where exactly is the reversal?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And that a good part of the software sold by western companies is written by russian programmers. Seriously I am ashamed to be part of the tech community, because of the incredible stupidity and ignorance so-called "intelligent people" on forums like this show everytime in relation to Russia. And it is no surprise a lot of them live in "brainwashed" America.

    9. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Base on RT's article, the replacement is MyOffice, a cloud-based, similar to Office 365, running on browsers or as standalone applications for Window, Android, iOS.

      If MyOffice is made by Kremlin Software won't that make MyKrSoft Office?

    10. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ripped off open-source software

      oxymoron of the day

    11. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think Russia already required the source for vetting purposes.

    12. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I am ashamed to be part of the tech community...

      I interpreted the original post as claiming Russia will slap a new facade on OSS and claim they "made it" without giving OSS credit. It may not be a dig against Russian programmers, but against Russian politicians who lie, or perhaps politicians in general, who, as we all well know in the USA, often take credit for what's not theirs and blame others for what is theirs. It's not just a Russian thing.

    13. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it will have a KGB back door not NSA back door; there's a difference.

    14. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like the US does?

    15. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who knows... maybe they already have all the Microsoft source code. There are state sponsored hackers, right?

      You don't need to hack anything. You just need university students. If you are doing research in operating systems that Microsoft thinks is interesting you can get access to Windows source code. Its supposed to be kept in a locked lab on secured computers, all researchers working in the lab signing an NDA, etc. A friend once had such access as a PhD candidate. He said it took forever to build on a high end system.

    16. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it is no surprise a lot of them live in "brainwashed" America.

      How do you know? No one has a location tag and few ever speak of where they live, yet you assume. Bias perchance?

    17. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      a good part of the software running in western companies is written by russian programmers.

      FTFY.

      Of course, most of them don't know it's there...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    18. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by spacepimp · · Score: 1

      A country level agreement is often met with a request to provide source code for "their safety". CHina demands it when they purchase Citrix Licensing, Russia can demand it when they use it for government purposes. I doubt they would need to hack MS to get their code made available. enough zeros in the order price is more than enough to get what you want. This change besides being a thumbing of the nose to MS also supports alternatives which boost their local economy. This is a move to hurt the US financially and boost their own services.

    19. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as an American in the tech community, I think most have the perception that Russia has been historically "behind" in software for economic reasons, not for reasons of intelligence or skill.

      We'd hear stories of Russians doing very technically impressive things "making do" with a lower availability of hardware during the 1980's and 1990's, for example, while the U.S. (again, due to economic reasons) was getting PC's for most everyone interested in buying one.

      Some of that perception of "technical lag" of the former Soviet states still probably persists, though times have certainly changed.

    20. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      And what exactly is the problem with that? Any sane and competent national government will want to run their operations with software that they fully control, and that has backdoors that only they have the key to.

      Of course, you can argue that any backdoors are dangerous because the wrong people could learn about them and exploit them, but we're talking about replacing Microsoft software here: that stuff is already known to have backdoors. Substituting software that you've audited to not have backdoors, and have instead inserted your own backdoors into, is a big step up from software that a foreign government has backdoor access to.

    21. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Oh, that's well known! ReactOS is an admirable project - too bad they haven't had more dedicated resources and goals devoted to it

    22. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Russia can do something like rebuild an ex DEC Alpha CPU from scratch, recompile Windows 7 for that, and then run it. They can then compile their domestic software on that, and it'll be like a walled garden, since no foreign hackers will be able to break into that

    23. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by cyberthanasis12 · · Score: 1

      Replace open-source software with free software and he has every right do to exactly this and be proud of it. I wish I could do the same thing where I live.

    24. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This line of thinking really doesn't fit it with the "Russia Bad" propaganda narrative that many Americans are currently enjoying buying into. It keeps them from thinking critically or doing any self assessment, activities that interfere w/ the dominant religion of US nationalism.

    25. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      How? And if it is a difference, how will you deal with other people on this planet *choosing* KGB over NSA??

    26. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by ppii · · Score: 1

      As far as I know it's not a rip-off. Many developers are coming from Lexicon (1980s product with about same age as MS Word) but MyOffice is more influenced by Google Docs and Office 365.

    27. Re:Let me foresee what will happen... by whodunit · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the constant invasions, undeclared wars and threats on our lives with nuclear weapons tend to kae us testy.

      But the absolute last straw was Wargaming nerfing battleships.

  10. Took them long to start building something of for by dr.Flake · · Score: 4, Interesting

    themselves,

    Would you feel comfortable if the White House, Wallstreet, DOD, DOJ, Police, Universities and Congress ran a complete Chinese software stack? Chinese routers, OS, Firewalls, Office, Mail, antivirus, etc etc.?

    --
    Why are other peoples sig's always more witty ???
  11. Dejavu: Apple recalls warehoused 7s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cites reason as: battery

  12. I wouldn't be too suprised by sasparillascott · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Microsoft probably works with every government they sell their software into as far as spying on their citizens etc. (it only makes business sense since these guys control market access and Microsoft has never been a company to quibble over morals) - so I'm sure Microsoft and Mr. Putin's Russia were great partners up till now.

    Now Putin may be wary that Microsoft gives preferential treatment to the NSA (since we know they worked closely with them before thanks to Snowden) etc. or he may just be doing this for domestic consumption (he appears to do alot of this) since their economy is in a tailspin.

    1. Re:I wouldn't be too suprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was also Jelzin, who probably sold out to MS for a few bottles of Vodka.

  13. Investing in your country by DatbeDank · · Score: 2

    This is called investing in your country and people. America, its government, and its corporations should take note.

    1. Re:Investing in your country by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Isn't there already laws on the books that require contracts to be handed out to domestic companies whenever possible?

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:Investing in your country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, should the US also kick out Microsoft and only use home grown software?

  14. Understanding the Vulnerabilities by lazarus · · Score: 2

    It makes perfect sense to remove the same systems you target in other countries from your own server farms and run proprietary systems that are less widely known and understood.

    --
    I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
  15. What took him so long? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    I mean, really.

  16. Re:Trans-Pacific Partnership will hurt them then a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russia isn't part of the TPP. Wikipedia has a country list, btw - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Pacific_Partnership

  17. Re:Took them long to start building something of f by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What if they ran on a set of hardware manufactured in China? That would be even worse!

  18. Yay! Kremlinology's back. by hey! · · Score: 0

    So clearly he sees software a point of national security vulnerability. Now what can we infer about his polices on offensive cyberwarfare?

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Yay! Kremlinology's back. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soviet Union 2: Electric Boogaloo

  19. Absolute common sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All countries should do this. Use open standards to exchange information with other countries/businesses and develop their own software. Having local operating systems/programs helps expand local computing knowledge and lessens the likelihood of data theft via back doors etc.

    As an added benefit people would be forced to start exchanging data in open formats or their partners/customers simply won't be able to read the data.

    I's a healthy idea.

  20. Re:Took them long to start building something of f by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The routers and firewalls already are (but you knew that). The software is only a matter of time...

  21. Re:Took them long to start building something of f by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Er... they already do ! Where are all the chips/components manufactured again ?

  22. The perks of being a Russian dictator by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    Hello, my name is Vladimir Putin. You may have seen my face, usually on the evening news, but not to worry; most of what you hear is true. Especially from that Snowden. I was shocked when I found out that your government does a lot of --how you say it, "dirty work" or "dirty laundry"? -- without asking for any of our help in these matters; your government firmly believes they are experts in these matters. Personally I have this to say: In Soviet Russia, Snowden is welcome to stay and ski. And here in Soviet Russia we tell Clippy to take a fucking hike, back to Redmond on that Microsoft horse it rode in on. Would you believe I asked to be their spokesman? Can you hear me now?

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    1. Re:The perks of being a Russian dictator by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      It's a joke some people don't like, but the guy has so much debt and so many dirty secrets that the Russians would seriously be remiss to not have him on their payroll by this point.

  23. How is this different from the last 3 times? by Andvari · · Score: 0

    They've tried it over: https://linux.slashdot.org/sto...
    and over: https://linux.slashdot.org/sto...
    and over again: https://linux.slashdot.org/sto...

    and failed: https://linux.slashdot.org/sto...
    and failed again: https://tech.slashdot.org/stor...

    What's different about this time around?

    1. Re:How is this different from the last 3 times? by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      All of those links are talking about different things, they're not five updates on the same story. So let's look at them in chronological order:

      First link (2007): Announcement of Linux to be installed in every Russian school.
      Second link (Jan 2009): Russian gov't working on an official OS for the whole country.
      Fifth link (May 2009): The proposal for the national OS is temporarily shelved due to lack of support from the legislative branch.
      Fourth link (Nov 2009): A follow-up to the first link, where the plan to deploy Linux in every Russian school faces some difficulties. This article is terribly vague and there's no follow-up to this one, so it's hard to say just how bad it was; it could've gotten right back on track next year for all I know.
      Third link (2010): Putin declares Russian federal gov't will move to Linux. Doesn't seem to be related to any of the previous articles, except perhaps as an official clarification of the second.

      Today's article of 2016: Moscow City in particular is beginning their migration to Linux.

    2. Re:How is this different from the last 3 times? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How it is different: by now 2M people who live in Crimea learned the hard way how much they can count on overseas.

      Of course, it does not mean that Redmond will no longer bribe enough Russian officials to trick them into Windows.

  24. Check the closet in the bathroom by Philosa · · Score: 1

    I wonder where the servers will be housed?

  25. Re:Took them long to start building something of f by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you feel comfortable if the White House, Wallstreet, DOD, DOJ, Police, Universities and Congress ran a complete Chinese software stack? Chinese routers, OS, Firewalls, Office, Mail, antivirus, etc etc.?

    In the U.S., the software is the *ONLY* thing not made in China.

  26. Ternary computing too? by robinsonne · · Score: 2

    Come on Putin, as long as we're rebuilding the Soviet Union, bring ternary computing back for a second go-round!

  27. Never heard of free software? by m.alessandrini · · Score: 1

    Just saying... reinventing the wheel is hard and bug-prone.

  28. Re:Trans-Pacific Partnership will hurt them then a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Russia, we wipe with TPP

  29. Economic Development, Snowden, Noodleman by jamander4 · · Score: 0

    The Russians are using their local talent to enter the software field. Recent articles describe Russian programming talent as second best to only China. Snowden's revelations largest affect seems to be economic. The economic sanctions imposed on Russia seem to unintended consequences that adversely affect American companies but sanctions often do. If you don't know who Noodlman is look it up.

    1. Re:Economic Development, Snowden, Noodleman by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The Russians have some excellent programmers, but they both work on malware for the mafia.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  30. Re:Took them long to start building something of f by guestapoo · · Score: 1
  31. An issue of national security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Extremely concerned about nationalist cyber-security = Major cyber-warfare participant. It is especially telling that it has started with emails. It substantiates the three-letter agencies' report that Russia is at the heart of major email hacks in this country. Putin is gearing up militarily, folks. Those who want us to backdoor our technology, similar to revealing our troop positions, are asking us to be fatally unprepared for this theater of operations. Israel and China are also major, and enthusiastic, players. This is an issue of national security. We'd better read the tea leaves and have a plan.

  32. Re:Trans-Pacific Partnership will hurt them then a by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    So the end of the communism did not end the shortage of toilet paper?

    For our non-Soviet friends: TP was in notorious short supply during the final days of the communist rule, which led to a lot of amusing anecdotes and jokes like:

    Party Speaker: Comrades! In 5 years, everyone will have a car!
    Listener: And when are we going to get toilet paper?
    PS: And comrades! In 10 years, everyone will have his own little house!
    L: But ... the toilet paper?
    PS (outraged): KISS MY ASS! (literally: lick me in the asshole)
    L: As usual. For themselves, the party has a solution, but for us...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  33. I think it's more sec decision than it is econom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US software can be (if not already) backdoor for US intel. Since US and Russia at arms-wrestling, it is wiser to block these holes.
    Would US gov buy encryption software from Russia?

    Remember when all pcs in kremlin were replaced with electric typewriters? or when Merkil iPhone was being tapped during 2008 crisis?

  34. This is probably more about money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wtih dwindling foreign currency reserves they need hard currency for military and luxury sector.

    3B$ is a serious money.

  35. Hit them HURT them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, I think a lesson must be taught to Russia:

    That interfering with the voting processes of a democracy is close to a declaration of war. (and no Mr. Trump I don't think, and neither do the various three letter agencies, think that the hacking of the DNC and voting machines was done by a 400 lb. woman sitting alone).

    I am hoping that the tens of billions of dollars spent yearly on the NSA and it's being the largest supercomputer and employer of mathematicians in the world hasn't been to waste. I'm hoping that the fact that Americans (or their close allies) having INVENTED and OWNING most of the basic technologies that run our technological world (the internet, Microsoft OS, Mac OS, Android, iOS, Facebook, Google, Twitter, SAP, Amazon, Cisco, Intel, AMD, ARM, MS Office, Exchange, telephone switching networks. trans-oceanic cable companies) gives the American security agencies an incredible advantage when it comes to planting backdoors/exploiting vulnerabilities that other nations don't have. That's not to mention American establishment (and control?) of some of the key financial networks which govern them movement of money around the world.

    So I'm hoping that in no uncertain terms the U.S. is sending/has sent a clear warning to Putin and his barbaric regime. Perhaps some of his overseas banking account just "disappears". Perhaps some of his most intimate e-mails (or even recorded telephone calls) are sent to his (few remaining) opponents.

    Otherwise I'll begin to think that the U.S.is just a overpaid, bloated, toothless cyber-tiger. Unfortunately, the only way us average citizens will probably ever know is if the Russian attacks cease. Then we'll know they got the message.

    I hope we send it.

  36. Unintended consequences by Trachman · · Score: 0

    There is a chance that some other countries will mandate forced switch to Linux based operating systems (some already have quasi-required to do so, such as Bulgaria).

    This will require SAP, Oracle and others to have adequate client software that does operate in Linux.

    We have heard this argument that it better to have one OS, but Apple OS demonstrated that competition is indeed valuable. Similiar argument could be applied to Android/iOS.

    While Putin is who we know he is, in the long term, government subsidized Linux might be the best thing that happened. Some people think that government should be in healthcare, using that logic government can be subsidizing open source software.

    I hope that they will do it in English, not a Russian Cyrillic masterpiece

  37. Why not invade Redmond? by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    Why not invade Redmond? It seems customary practice in Russia to take what you want by force.

    I'm sure some jerk could argue that Alaska was once Russian. That Washington isn't hat far away from Alaska. That Russia never sold Washington to the US. And that therefore...

    What a bunch of idiots. Regardless of the technology (I don't particularly like MS') you should know that coming up with an operating system, a desktop and usable applications is not an easy task. What's the Russian version be like? A ripoff of ?

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    1. Re:Why not invade Redmond? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      >> you should know that coming up with an operating system, a desktop and usable applications is not an easy task.

      Thats why you just know they will be using Linux.

    2. Re:Why not invade Redmond? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Because there's nothing in Redmond that the Russians want?

    3. Re:Why not invade Redmond? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Regardless of the technology (I don't particularly like MS') you should know that coming up with an operating system, a desktop and usable applications is not an easy task.

      I find it very, very easy. I just go to linuxmint.com and look for the "download" link. Installing takes about 20 minutes tops. Much simpler, faster, and easier than messing with Windows. Updating my work computer to Win10 (not my choice) took ages.

      What's the Russian version be like?

      Probably some Linux distro with a new theme? What's so hard about that?

    4. Re:Why not invade Redmond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I just go to linuxmint.com and look for the "download" link

      I think you missed the part where the OP said "usable".

      (Zing!)

    5. Re:Why not invade Redmond? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I'm sure some jerk could argue that Alaska was once Russian.

      Northern California once was as well. Actually, all of the western coast of North America as far south as Fort Ross (just north of San Francisco) was claimed by Russia, though the majority of their settlements and activity were in Alaska. They overhunted until the fur trade petered out, and by that point their North American settlements were economically impracticable and Alaska was sold.

      It seems customary practice in Russia to take what you want by force

      All they have to do is claim there are still ethnic Russians living in Washington and California who are of course being viciously persecuted by Washington (probably true, heh) and in need of liberating.

    6. Re:Why not invade Redmond? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You must have missed the part where I said it takes about 20 minutes to install. That's "usable" in my book, especially compared to Windows 10 where installation and updates are a complete PITA, and the user interface once you finally get it running is an abomination.

  38. How the mighty have fallen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From Tzar to Tech Support. Sounds like he'll be busy. On the bright side, hopfully the office dress code will require a shirt.

    1. Re:How the mighty have fallen. by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      When the Russian OS crashes - it will be the Tsar Bomba.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  39. Taking a hint from the Russian space programme... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll replace all their Office software with... spiral bound notepads and pencils.

    Keep It Simple, Stupid.

  40. Re:Took them long to start building something of f by Archtech · · Score: 1

    For the slow of understanding: Irony Alert.

    --
    I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
  41. Allowed by GPL by anwyn · · Score: 1

    The GPL allows you to create modified version of the program without releasing the source, so long as you don't distribute. If they keep all the software inside the Russian government, they haven't distributed. So I don't think this can be called a rip-off.

  42. Re:Trans-Pacific Partnership will hurt them then a by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    > In Russia, we wipe with TPP

    I thought most other nations used WIPO*.


    * World Imaginary Property Organization

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  43. Putin's internet czar German Klimenko by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't that be "Internet tsar"???

    1. Re:Putin's internet czar German Klimenko by unixisc · · Score: 1

      During Soviet times, I used to spell it as CZAR - Communist Zenithal Authority in the Republics

  44. North Korea linux best linux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Came for best linux, was not disapointed.
    After all, the glorious peoples' republic invented Linux and will gladly share it with their brothers in world Socialism.

  45. Suggested name: Putinux by Steve1952 · · Score: 1

    It seems only fair to me. Since Linux is named after Linus, the Russian version should be named after Putin.

  46. Logical solution to NSA spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not to use backdoored software.

  47. Politics aside, it might be just be useful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Politics aside, if Russia could come up with a cloud system that is usable across their government, and it becomes stable, it just might be something other companies might hop onto. Especially with things like AD and Exchange, which are pretty much critical to business function these days. If they make a directory system that can scale like AD, they might be onto something.

  48. Re:Suggested name: Putinux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Each process will have standard putin and standard putout. You can redirect the latter to /dev/siberia if you do not want to see it (ever again).

  49. You insensitive clod! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? Go criticize EU governments by starting a political party. Gee, no problems doing that.

    He's a Nazi, you insensitive clod! He's prohibited by law from starting a political party in much of Europe!

    1. Re: You insensitive clod! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just call it something else, but go with same concepts ( hatred on non white; blame all others; invade nations all over ; etc ). There is nothing in Europe that stops that.

    2. Re: You insensitive clod! by johanw · · Score: 1

      > invade nations all over

      The EU is not the USA. Although some EU governments are willing henchmen of the USA government when they invade other countries.

  50. Most importantly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will the Russian OS be supported on Steam?

  51. Cronies win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's how corrupt governments work

  52. Re:Took them long to start building something of f by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

    In the U.S., the software is the *ONLY* thing not made in China.

    That's because it is made in India.

  53. Vladimix by Ngarrang · · Score: 1

    The Russian government should develop their own distro and should call Vladimix.

    Joke aside, it makes sense that that Russian government would want to, and should, switch away from Microsoft Windows; ensuring one's data security is important.

    --
    Bearded Dragon
    1. Re:Vladimix by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      I heard Putin wanted to call it Red Star OS but that's already been taken.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    2. Re:Vladimix by unixisc · · Score: 1

      They are already supportive of ReactOS, which originates there

  54. Re:Suggested name: Putinux by behrooz0az · · Score: 1

    Damn, someone please do this. make LFS, link /dev/null to /dev/siberia in your build environment and s/null/siberia/g on every package. PLEASE. I know there are nutjobs among you good folk who are crazy enough to do this.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
  55. Re:Suggested name: Putinux by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

    Except that Linus is the first name, while Putin is the family name. So it should be more like Vlad the Compiler.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  56. russian programmers by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

    To be fair, in my 30 coding career, some of the top programmers I've ever studied and worked with were Russian. Their skill was just vastly, disproportionately better than any other peers and colleagues. No idea why. I'd actually look forward to Russian made software! Except for all the pesky back doors.

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:russian programmers by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      And they do well in coding contests (while it's in English...)

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  57. Re:Suggested name: Putinux by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    Sounds a bit like my home stdio.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  58. the USA should try to do the same! by 4wdloop · · Score: 1

    ....oh..wait...darn...they are in...Redmond, WA!

    --
    4wdloop
  59. Re:Suggested name: Putinux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to that naming convention, shouldn't it really be Putux?

  60. Re:Suggested name: Putinux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or Putix?

  61. Re:Took them long to start building something of f by spacepimp · · Score: 1

    From a hardware perspective (which can easily hide/mask mal intent) almost all of the hardware we purchase is difficult to trust. Add in the firmware added by the NSA for things like phones etc, and the saying only trust a source if you see the code. The same applies for hardware. I wish we could have open source hardware in more abundance.

  62. Well done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's exactly what he should be doing, just as everybody in the United States should start using McAfee Antivirus, and dumping Kaspersky.

  63. Re:Trans-Pacific Partnership will hurt them then a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if this means Venezuela will collapse soon from the lack of TP there?

  64. Windows Source Code given to Russia - ju rebranded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows Source Code given to Russia - they just rebranded it. After all, MSFT can't exactly sue the govt there. Govts have bullets and judges.

    I had plans to travel to Russia - ancestors came from there. Didn't get there before they made that crazy law about having keys to all decryption. Can't go now. Just can't.

  65. why is protectionism so big right now? by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    Putin is a protectionist ... Trump is a protectionist ... Clinton is a protectionist ...

    People! What is going on?? Why do we have to pay more for locally created products? That's a large part of why we overthrew the British government in the first place.

  66. Next: ReactOS replacing Windows by unixisc · · Score: 2

    can unintentionally do the right things: kick Microsoft's, SAP's et al.'s ass.

    While it's a good first step, Russia should do the world a service on the OS front by backing efforts to make ReactOS a full fledged OS. Have 2 flavors - a win64 version that's fully compatible w/ Windows 7, and a win32 version that's fully compatible w/ XP. Make sure that Classic Shell runs on it, or better still, make it a part of the shell so that people can pick whichever UI they wanna work in.

    1. Re:Next: ReactOS replacing Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While it's a good first step, Russia should do the world a service on the OS front by backing efforts to make ReactOS a full fledged OS. Have 2 flavors - a win64 version that's fully compatible w/ Windows 7, and a win32 version that's fully compatible w/ XP. Make sure that Classic Shell runs on it, or better still, make it a part of the shell so that people can pick whichever UI they wanna work in.

      ReactOS has been around but how many installs, what is security profile and where is support. Want to install on your home machine fine, install on 600,000 machines in Russia, unlikely.

      If you want to move, might as well go the whole way. Move to a OS like Linux or BSD. These have a know history of stability, security and are maintainable. Sure only 1-2% of US desktop market but heavy on server and embedded devices plus majority of pads and phones. IOS is BSD with a custom shell. China moved this direction in late 90s, in response to Microsoft complaints of piracy. China decided against licensing and developed their own version of Red Star Linux. Then Microsoft came in and offered licensing for pennies on the dollar. That was the end of Linux. Sad as I walked into a Chinese computer store in a city south of Beijing at the time to see dozens of PCs for sale with Linux installed.

      Will see if this is real or a stunt to get cheap licenses.

  67. ex SSR by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Uh, Russia hasn't been Communist now in some 25 years. Expansionist, maybe, but certainly not Communist

  68. Chinese/Muslim preferences by unixisc · · Score: 2

    I could see Russia, but why would China, Iran or any Islamic entity want Trump to win? China would stand to lose big if they can no longer sell to the US, and if Trump follows through on his extreme vetting moves to stop hostile Muslims from coming into the US, ISIS and AQ have no reason to rejoice either. The last 3 have probably just said it hoping to apply reverse psychology on the US voters

    1. Re:Chinese/Muslim preferences by Rakarra · · Score: 2

      I could see Russia, but why would China, Iran or any Islamic entity want Trump to win?

      Because they don't like Hillary? She was always the war hawkiest of Obama's cabinet. Trump has yet to show any diplomatic competency, and his fans just lap up his nonsense that he's "the best" with no proof.

      China would stand to lose big if they can no longer sell to the US

      China has the US's balls in a vice, not selling to the US will hurt China, but it will hurt the US far FAR more.

      if Trump follows through on his extreme vetting moves to stop hostile Muslims from coming into the US, ISIS and AQ have no reason to rejoice either.

      ISIS's and al Queda's motivations are not difficult to figure out; they've been pretty honest in what they want: to drive a wedge between Muslims and non-Muslims. They dislike "moderate Muslims" in general, and feel like those who do not fight to pull down non-Muslim societies are traitors. Absolutely they are happy with Trump's tarring of Muslims and calls for Muslim travel restrictions. They YEARN for a horrible war.

    2. Re:Chinese/Muslim preferences by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      China, Iran and North Korea want somebody who can be easily manipulated. That is trump. Have you listened to him. He screams about BUSINESS with China and Mexico, but the ONLY one that he speaks of addressing is Mexico. Yet, NAFTA has 1 simple quick fix and it would solve EVERYTHING with Mexico trade, while helping them out. But what does Trump say about CHina's invasion into other nation's territory? NOTHING. What does he say about Iran and what he will do? NOTHING. What does Trump say that he will do with North Korea? He will ask China to invade them (kind of like asking America to invade Puerto Rico, or Canada).

      ISIS and AQ HATE hillary and anybody connected to O. He has overall done a good job on AQ, but he somewhat screwed up with ISIS. Hillary will send in troops and finish this. That is why Russia wants Trump. He and the neo-cons/tea* will walk away and allow Russia to own it all.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:Chinese/Muslim preferences by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Trump has been pretty hostile to China setting up military bases in the South China Sea. There is nothing about him that's remotely pro-Chinese, the way he has been accommodating of Russian interests (e.g. in the GOP platform). Similarly, ISIS has nothing against Hilary, beyond the fact that she's an infidel, but if Trump had his way, none of their agents could get into the US anywhere as easily. Their candidate for president would be Hilary, not Trump!

    4. Re:Chinese/Muslim preferences by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Absolutely they are happy with Trump's tarring of Muslims and calls for Muslim travel restrictions. They YEARN for a horrible war.

      They should be careful what they wish for. If you push the US hard enough, this or this happens.

      Daesh thinks America is weak because we try to restrain our sociopaths and psychopaths. They don't seem to understand that we still have our sociopaths and psychopaths. We try to keep them on a tight leash. Push hard enough and—we stop trying.

    5. Re:Chinese/Muslim preferences by Gussington · · Score: 1

      I could see Russia, but why would China, Iran or any Islamic entity want Trump to win? China would stand to lose big if they can no longer sell to the US, Because that would never happen. Trump is business man, and China is the biggest partner around. As much as he says a bunch of stuff, he'll be looking to do any deal at any cost as long as he benefits personally somehow.

      and if Trump follows through on his extreme vetting moves to stop hostile Muslims from coming into the US, ISIS and AQ have no reason to rejoice either.

      The extremist message is that the US is evil and you should join the struggle against it. When Trump actually proves that the US is evil by implementing racist policy, it will hand extremists all over the world the biggest gift they could ever ask for.

    6. Re:Chinese/Muslim preferences by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      You are VERY mistaken WRT to foreign policy

      And here is what Daesh thinks.
      This is interesting in that a daesh expert believes that they will attack us like they attacked Paris to influence their election. And Daesh hopes that Trump wins according to them

      Finally, This one sums it all up best.

      But hey, look around. You can actually find articles written that will support your position, but, they are very far and few in-between and none by experts on China, Daesh, AQ, Russia, etc.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    7. Re:Chinese/Muslim preferences by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      China has the US's balls in a vice, not selling to the US will hurt China, but it will hurt the US far FAR more.

      LOL. You obviously do not know American manufacturing and our situation. China does NOT have us. Best thing that could happen to America is for us to raise taxes on consumed goods/services based on where the worst part/service comes from. If they emit a lot of CO2, then high tax. With this approach, we get all nations to clean up their CO2. At the same time, since America actually is low emission (with an intelligent normalization of emissions / $GDP ), it would allow the west to re-build rather quickly.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    8. Re:Chinese/Muslim preferences by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      Ah, not quite.

      How will the working poor in the USA tolerate the dramatic hike in the cost of their manufactured goods that *will* come from the US shifting production away from China???

      A major part of your population is going to crack the shits.

      If you had cared more for your own along the way then this would be less of a problem.

    9. Re:Chinese/Muslim preferences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Al Qaida hates Hillary and Obama? I doubt so. Hillary and Obama are Al Qaida's allies (Al Qaida, also known as Al Nosra, whatever-Al-Cham, and "white helmets"). HEZBOLLAH is doing more against Al Qaida and ISIS right now that Obama et al. do.

    10. Re:Chinese/Muslim preferences by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      LOL. You obviously do not know American manufacturing and our situation. China does NOT have us.

      The US economy is a highly-tuned machine. Like a Jaguar car, it's high performance, but it doesn't take much to make it come tumbling down. The Dot-Com Bust and the Housing Bubble were minor problems compared to what a trade war with the country which actually makes all of our stuff would do.

      At the same time, since America actually is low emission (with an intelligent normalization of emissions / $GDP ),

      The rest of the world is not going to accept that definition of 'low emissions' because it's crafted to benefit only one country: the USA. It's pretty much the only way you could manipulate the definition of 'low emission" to make the US come out ahead. Pretty much everyone else is going to use 'per capita,' and it seems difficult to argue that they're wrong.

  69. Putin "endorsement" of Trump help Hillary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is actually not true. Putin has said that he likes Trump.

    Obviously you are a checkers player not a chess player. Does an "endorsement" by Putin hurt or help a US Presidential candidate? He is **helping** Hillary by framing Trump as a friend of his, or the person he desires to be in the White House.

    He didn't say, but it has been implied by experts that it is because Putin thinks that Trump is a foreign state moron that he can control much easier than Clinton.

    Also obvious is that you have not been paying attention. Trump is inexperienced, has a poor grasp of things, and is therefore **unpredictable**. Unpredictable is hard to deal with, can be dangerous. Hillary is far more of a known and far more predictable, therefore far easier to outplay as has been done repeatedly in the past. Trump could easily do something incredibly stupid that harms both sides. Trump stupidity is not necessary a win for Russia, it is a threat to Russia and Russian interests as well.

    1. Re:Putin "endorsement" of Trump help Hillary by lalleglad · · Score: 1

      Actually I play more chess than checkers.

      When has foreign policy paid any attention to the American voter?
      Americans are very similar to the British, with the world being 'disconnected from us', so foreign policy has only attention in a presidential electorate when a lot of American lives are at stake, eg. the Vietnam War.

      Well, Putin is a moron as well as Trump, and Putin is not afraid of Trump as a president because he knows well that Trump will have a lot less power towards 'pressing the red button' than any previous US president had.

      Reagan was initially thought as not being a threat to Russia because many thought he was not really educated, and a moron. This turned out to be false because he had a lot more experience that he had learned from, and a political focus that few outsiders had expected, so he turned out to be a great US president of recent times.

      Trump shows none of those things, except being held up by his father, moving along with mafia connections and in general not getting the financial results he could have had with the environment he was in.

      Trump looks like a financial failure if you ask me, and soon he will also be a political failure.

      And I am not even in the race to decide it, as I can't vote the 8.Nov.

    2. Re:Putin "endorsement" of Trump help Hillary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you are a checkers player not a chess player.

      Actually I play more chess than checkers.

      Being a chess player is about how you think, not what pieces are on the board in front of you and how they move. Your posts indicates a checkers way of thinking. Learn to think more steps into the future. Learn to match observations with logic. Now go back and try a real reply if you dare, not the dodging and distractions you just offered, defending your hypothesis that Putin prefers Trump against the rebuttal I offered.

    3. Re:Putin "endorsement" of Trump help Hillary by losfromla · · Score: 1

      To the morons going on about chess vs checkers: Being a competitive chess player does not indicate increased ability in areas other than playing chess. If you think you are smarter than average it isn't due to your chess playing prowess, it is due to other factors/advantages in our genetics or more-likely upbringing.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    4. Re: Putin "endorsement" of Trump help Hillary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about a go player. Contemporary strategy is all about logistics

    5. Re:Putin "endorsement" of Trump help Hillary by Gussington · · Score: 1

      If you think you are smarter than average it isn't due to your chess playing prowess, it is due to other factors/advantages in our genetics or more-likely upbringing.

      An upbringing playing Chess?

    6. Re:Putin "endorsement" of Trump help Hillary by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      "Well, Putin is a moron as well as Trump..."

      Putin is not a moron.

    7. Re:Putin "endorsement" of Trump help Hillary by losfromla · · Score: 1

      The thing is typically if you are brought up playing chess you are surrounded by a family that does things that families (or a parent) that plays chess do. Like eat well, read to/with their kids, converse on various current topics, discuss history, etc. So the chess happens to be one of many things but as we like to say around here "correlation does not imply causation". In this case, playing chess isn't the reason people are more able at intellectual pursuits, it just happens to be one of many things they have been breast fed since young. In cases where youth chess clubs are established in "the hood", the kids can and do excel at chess but that doesn't translate necessarily into broad academic achievement, other than the effect that it can have in their belief in their own ability to achieve.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
  70. You play checkers, Russians play chess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you know Putin didn't say that he likes Trump in an effort to get more Americans to vote for Hillary? Americans aren't exactly known for being big fans of Russia or Putin.

    I don't 'know' what Putin is thinking, but I am also not wearing a tinfoil hat, ...

    Then take off whatever is constricting the blood flow to your brain and apply logic.

    (1) Putin disliked heavily by US voters.

    (2) Putin communicates that Trump is a friend, that he has a desire to see Trump win.

    What does logic tell you is the result?

    ... and I am also thinking that American voters in general aren't stupid, and I think that Putin knows that, too.

    Again, apply logic. Trump won the Republican primary to everyone's very great surprise. To everyone's even greater surprise it is not clear that Hillary is going to beat him according to the polls. Trump is turning out to be competitive so far, much to everyone's surprise, again. He is finding a lot of support outside of the far right fringe that got him the nomination.

    So your evidence for American voters not being that stupid is?

    And, as I think myself that Trump is a moron, also in foreign policy, and that Putin would think it is better for him to have Trump in the hot seat than Clinton, I believe it to be true.

    Using the logic of a checkers player not a chess player. The most dangerous situation is when a highly unstable and unpredictable person is in the foreign policy game. Foreign policy is not a zero sum game, one side's loss is the other sides's win, **both** sides can lose. Trump is dangerous to Russian and Russian foreign policy. Trump through stupidity can easy f' something up in a way that harms both the US and Russia. Unlike Clinton who is well known, well understood, predictable, and the Russians imminently able to outplay her. As she has been outplayed before, repeatedly.

    1. Re:You play checkers, Russians play chess by lalleglad · · Score: 1

      I don't why I continue to reply to Cowards, and this will be my last.

      What makes you think that Putin is not also a dork?
      Have you seen any of the situations he is trying to create, showing that he is actually a superman?

      Trump won the republican primaries because a lot of Americans are so fed up with politicians that has no connection with the lives of regular Americans, so they saw Trump as way to protest that. Trump has the most support by 'angry white low waged trash' that has little education and knowledge about the world surrounding them.

      Using the Putin card doesn't favor Trump, because Putin is in himself a moron, and he is rather seeing a moron like the politically inexperienced Trump in office than the the experienced Clinton, that Putin knows he can't wind up his little finger.
      Putin knows more about what Clinton is like, but he doesn't like it because he know she is strong. Compared to the little experienced Trump that may throw fits, but won't otherwise know what he is doing and therefore a much easier target than Clinton.

      In all of this I am not saying that Clinton is the perfect president candidate, but compared to Trump, there is no comparison. Trump is not anything that he claims and he is everything the moron that the opposition claims, about a financial and political failure.
      Jeb Bush or Ted Cruz would have been more regular and respectable Republican candidates that I could have supported, compared to Trump.

      Trump is in himself a failure, in every way!

    2. Re:You play checkers, Russians play chess by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      What makes you think that Putin is not also a dork?
      Have you seen any of the situations he is trying to create, showing that he is actually a superman?

      Did you miss how he rather masterfully seized Crimea with very little bloodshed, while the western powers were unable or unwilling to do anything about it? He's not a superman, but he's no idiot either.

      Jeb Bush or Ted Cruz would have been more regular and respectable Republican candidates that I could have supported, compared to Trump.

      Ted Cruz is a religious loon whose views are even more right-wing and extreme than Trump's. Even other Republicans in Congress hated him with a passion. Jeb was about as establishment as you can get, and rode on his brother's legacy which only hurt him. But primaries these days tend to choose polarizing figures it seems, so someone "safe" and rather middle-of-the-road like Jeb had no chance.

  71. I wonder how much Windows 10 OS-as-malware by waspleg · · Score: 1

    plays in to this. Very curious indeed.

    "Moscowâ(TM)s government has already switched Cisco Systems Inc. technology for city surveillance cameras to local software"

    Leaks also cover the CIA intercept of Cisco gear en route to places by NSA for spyware installation.

    This seems to be about national security more than the money despite their claim.

  72. Putin is a dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't trust anything coming out of any country Putin and his have significant influence. I imagine his cronies coming into a company and saying "do this or we'll kill your friends and family and then come back for you last" Old style KGB. Lots of folks claiming that's ignorant, but, unfortunately it's probably true.

  73. Too Many Fingers Spoil the Pie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The talent is definitely there to make this work, the only question is if there will be enough cloud cover to keep powerful non-expert's... wonderful ideas out of the kitchen.

  74. Re:Took them long to start building something of f by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the U.S., the software is the *ONLY* thing not made in China.

    That's because it is made in India.

    If only somebody (a presidential candidate?) would do something about that.

  75. Because Hillary has a history of starting wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And these countries/entities are all on the short list of future wars.

    Trump has not yet launched a war, which isn't the same as saying that he won't, just that he hasn't.

    If you research central banking and the monetary system, everything will make more sense.

  76. Annexation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...in Crimea following Russia's 2014 annexation". That's a false statement. After the western backed fascist coup overthrew the elected government of Ukraine, the people of Crimea, (who are Russian speakers), were told that they would no longer be able to use their language in any official business. 97% of them voted to secede from Ukraine and join Russia. That's democracy in action.

  77. Old news by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    The US started doing that years ago. Tables, ipad, phones, in fact almost nothing runs windows in the US anymore. Just some desktops. Even they are moving to the cloud. Won't need microsoft windows much longer.