There's a difference between a few parties having access to it through means whose legality is under a cloud and anyone with enough money being able to purchase it whenever they want.
Compare this to pre-Internet days. It's as if anyone could buy your phone records from the phone company, or could buy the senders and recipients of all of your mail, and possibly even buy the information describing the kind of mail.
This is taking a situation that was already wrong to start with and making it so much more wrong that it's hard to put into words.
That's all dependent on the system being designed properly or revised properly as demands change though. If demand for corridors outstrips carrying capacity it'll still result in traffic jams. The idea of cooperative systems isn't bad, but the passengers are probably only going to put up with a small amount of delay before finding the system unacceptable. It also breaks-down where the density drops too far. This could even be a problem in a city like New York, the density is high in Manhattan, but starts to drop considerably in Queens and Brooklyn as one gets further from Manhattan. For a system that uses conventional roads or is at least capable of using conventional roads in lower-density areas but has access to grade-separate routes in high-density areas this could work, but that might preclude the skytran idea entirely.
Sounds like an analogy to an infinite-loop game of Go, where the flipping begets more flipping to where previously flipped pieces are flipped again and continue spreading, so long as one keeps flipping the pieces...
...but one of the principal reasons why transport in just about every form that we now see it is due to cost. It's a lot cheaper to build the least expensive road/path/tunnel/track possible, even if that means that the vehicles that travel those paths must be more expensive in order to self-propel. For this to be otherwise the usage must be very high. To a more pedestrian example (ha!), moving sidewalks are not terribly common. They're found only where extremely high volumes of foot traffic are present and all heading in basically the same direction, like in airports where they're used to connect sections of terminals. Just about anywhere else they're unsuited, either people need to make too many intermediate stops, or not enough people would use it, or there are no clear flows to take advantage of them.
For transport like rail, conventional steel track is relatively inexpensive, and even tunnels with conventional steel track have low costs once they're built in most cases. By contrast, commercial maglev has basically been stillborn as the cost to build and operate an active track is really high, and the benefits of the speeds that maglev should provide do not yet outweigh the costs.
Hyperloop is cool, especially if you're a fan of William F. Nolan and George Clayton Johnson's science fiction works, but it has all of the downsides of maglev combined with all of the downsides of building subways, so the ridership would have to be massive to make it cost effective.
I haven't tried to do registry stuff remotely in a very long time, but I remember being able to connect to remote registries in Windows 95... We used to mess with each other during computer class that way.
So you establish officers that act as liaisons between the agencies, and you establish a legal structure to allow for that domestic agency to apply for warrants.
Oh wait, we did that. Then the Bush administration ignored the laws that were so loose that they allowed for after-the-fact warrants, not even seeking those.
Shouldn't this violate the Law of Conservation of Energy? Or is this literally the achievement of what would have normally been thought of as an asymptote to infinity, where no energy can be extracted from this closed system and it's perpetuating on merely perfect conservation of the energy that was introduced into the system when it was established?
Bronze is worth more as a material for other uses than it is as a sheet of numbers. Stone is worth something besides as storing numbers, but it is arguably less valuable. That bronze won't survive a century in most cases, the stone might.
Depending on what needs configured, using the MMC on a GUI workstation associated with the Domain in question may let most of those configuration tasks happen without ever having to touch a command line.
It's oddly reminicent of the Novell model, which was where one put a minimal config on the server and then did the rest of the job with the supervisor account from a workstation. You couldn't even do most tasks directly on the server once it was set up, it was basically only really useful for operating the local tape backup. Everything else was done from whatever Novell-connected workstation you logged on to.
Back to Microsoft's current direction, it makese sense both for lightly equipped servers, presumably where there are lots of them working in parallel, and for VMs that are created and destroyed at will, for there to be very little actual on-box configuration to get them working. You don't want to have to manually manage dozens or hundreds of servers, you want to be able to do those tasks to the whole set as a group. Whether you use GUI or CLI, being able to do that from a single point makes a lot more sense.
Perhaps there were real security concerns vis a vis Trump that simply couldn't be addressed due to the charged political atmosphere, but might be addressable after some time has passed, especially if it's American agencies that decide to levy charges after a congress, tired of the antics, decides that it really has had enough.
Obviously this is ignorant speculation, so take it with a grain of salt.
It gets muddier when it comes to US operations that are not on US soil, and that's also supposed to help firm-up the distinction between the FBI as a mostly-conventional federal law enforcement agency that operates domestically and the CIA as an espionage agency that is supposed to operate outside of the borders of the United States.
Obviously these distinctions are not as cut and dried as they're supposed to be, and it gets worse when the NSA and other agencies get involved. The compartmentalization that's supposed to prevent federal agencies from treading upon the rights those within the borders of the United States has been eroded in the name of the Wahr on Terrah to where if they want to circumvent, they can circumvent.
I actually once printed-up bingo cards in advance of a conference call we had to do and handed them out to the rest of my team. Even better, they filled them out as the call progressed.
That XPS 13 might actually be one of the easier ones to run Linux on, since the XPS 13 Developer Edition is available out-of-the-box with Linux.
Way back in the day I'd bought an AMD64-based Gateway to run Linux on, it was basically impossible since there was some chipset issue that caused the clock to advance too fast and randomly. Not sure what the bug was but I never got around to making it work and stuck with XP.
I would love a great Linux laptop, something with around a 15" screen, at least 1920x1080, preferably 1920x1200 or greater, but it's hard to justify the cost for a new one when they're going to come in at a thousand dollars.
I was thinking about recommending something like this but realized that Windows 10 might be a prerequisite because of some application needed to work with the files. That would then mean finding a way to provide the host OS access to the guest OS's filesystem in order to access those files.
I would be much more inclined to run Windows as a VM on a Linux box as the host OS, and to restrict stuff before Windows ever boots up.
Disable the wireless interface in the device manager. Or, look for the switch on the side of the computer that turns of the wireless, if it still has such a thing.
Slashdot Mirror
There are already several examples that claim to be perpetual motion machines under patent.
There's a difference between a few parties having access to it through means whose legality is under a cloud and anyone with enough money being able to purchase it whenever they want.
Compare this to pre-Internet days. It's as if anyone could buy your phone records from the phone company, or could buy the senders and recipients of all of your mail, and possibly even buy the information describing the kind of mail.
This is taking a situation that was already wrong to start with and making it so much more wrong that it's hard to put into words.
I mean, Google isn't exactly going to enable us to skip/ignore ads, are they?
What's Google's practical application for such a technology?
That's all dependent on the system being designed properly or revised properly as demands change though. If demand for corridors outstrips carrying capacity it'll still result in traffic jams. The idea of cooperative systems isn't bad, but the passengers are probably only going to put up with a small amount of delay before finding the system unacceptable. It also breaks-down where the density drops too far. This could even be a problem in a city like New York, the density is high in Manhattan, but starts to drop considerably in Queens and Brooklyn as one gets further from Manhattan. For a system that uses conventional roads or is at least capable of using conventional roads in lower-density areas but has access to grade-separate routes in high-density areas this could work, but that might preclude the skytran idea entirely.
Sounds like an analogy to an infinite-loop game of Go, where the flipping begets more flipping to where previously flipped pieces are flipped again and continue spreading, so long as one keeps flipping the pieces...
...but one of the principal reasons why transport in just about every form that we now see it is due to cost. It's a lot cheaper to build the least expensive road/path/tunnel/track possible, even if that means that the vehicles that travel those paths must be more expensive in order to self-propel. For this to be otherwise the usage must be very high. To a more pedestrian example (ha!), moving sidewalks are not terribly common. They're found only where extremely high volumes of foot traffic are present and all heading in basically the same direction, like in airports where they're used to connect sections of terminals. Just about anywhere else they're unsuited, either people need to make too many intermediate stops, or not enough people would use it, or there are no clear flows to take advantage of them.
For transport like rail, conventional steel track is relatively inexpensive, and even tunnels with conventional steel track have low costs once they're built in most cases. By contrast, commercial maglev has basically been stillborn as the cost to build and operate an active track is really high, and the benefits of the speeds that maglev should provide do not yet outweigh the costs.
Hyperloop is cool, especially if you're a fan of William F. Nolan and George Clayton Johnson's science fiction works, but it has all of the downsides of maglev combined with all of the downsides of building subways, so the ridership would have to be massive to make it cost effective.
I haven't tried to do registry stuff remotely in a very long time, but I remember being able to connect to remote registries in Windows 95... We used to mess with each other during computer class that way.
So you establish officers that act as liaisons between the agencies, and you establish a legal structure to allow for that domestic agency to apply for warrants.
Oh wait, we did that. Then the Bush administration ignored the laws that were so loose that they allowed for after-the-fact warrants, not even seeking those.
You're just bitter because your candidate was so bad he lost to a black man named Hussein.
Shouldn't this violate the Law of Conservation of Energy? Or is this literally the achievement of what would have normally been thought of as an asymptote to infinity, where no energy can be extracted from this closed system and it's perpetuating on merely perfect conservation of the energy that was introduced into the system when it was established?
Bronze is worth more as a material for other uses than it is as a sheet of numbers. Stone is worth something besides as storing numbers, but it is arguably less valuable. That bronze won't survive a century in most cases, the stone might.
It's almost like humans act as human nature causes them to act.
Depending on what needs configured, using the MMC on a GUI workstation associated with the Domain in question may let most of those configuration tasks happen without ever having to touch a command line.
It's oddly reminicent of the Novell model, which was where one put a minimal config on the server and then did the rest of the job with the supervisor account from a workstation. You couldn't even do most tasks directly on the server once it was set up, it was basically only really useful for operating the local tape backup. Everything else was done from whatever Novell-connected workstation you logged on to.
Back to Microsoft's current direction, it makese sense both for lightly equipped servers, presumably where there are lots of them working in parallel, and for VMs that are created and destroyed at will, for there to be very little actual on-box configuration to get them working. You don't want to have to manually manage dozens or hundreds of servers, you want to be able to do those tasks to the whole set as a group. Whether you use GUI or CLI, being able to do that from a single point makes a lot more sense.
Perhaps there were real security concerns vis a vis Trump that simply couldn't be addressed due to the charged political atmosphere, but might be addressable after some time has passed, especially if it's American agencies that decide to levy charges after a congress, tired of the antics, decides that it really has had enough.
Obviously this is ignorant speculation, so take it with a grain of salt.
It gets muddier when it comes to US operations that are not on US soil, and that's also supposed to help firm-up the distinction between the FBI as a mostly-conventional federal law enforcement agency that operates domestically and the CIA as an espionage agency that is supposed to operate outside of the borders of the United States.
Obviously these distinctions are not as cut and dried as they're supposed to be, and it gets worse when the NSA and other agencies get involved. The compartmentalization that's supposed to prevent federal agencies from treading upon the rights those within the borders of the United States has been eroded in the name of the Wahr on Terrah to where if they want to circumvent, they can circumvent.
Wouldn't that be into your ass, rather than out of?
BINGO! I've got BINGO!
I actually once printed-up bingo cards in advance of a conference call we had to do and handed them out to the rest of my team. Even better, they filled them out as the call progressed.
XP was essentially an LTS release. As are all of Microsoft's OS releases.
I'll half-agree with you. They're long-term.
That XPS 13 might actually be one of the easier ones to run Linux on, since the XPS 13 Developer Edition is available out-of-the-box with Linux.
Way back in the day I'd bought an AMD64-based Gateway to run Linux on, it was basically impossible since there was some chipset issue that caused the clock to advance too fast and randomly. Not sure what the bug was but I never got around to making it work and stuck with XP.
I would love a great Linux laptop, something with around a 15" screen, at least 1920x1080, preferably 1920x1200 or greater, but it's hard to justify the cost for a new one when they're going to come in at a thousand dollars.
Okay, I'll take a shot...
Maybe that orange mass on his head isn't hair. Maybe it's a finely woven copper Faraday cage.
I donno, there has to be a twist...
Sounds like this is a developer. Good hygiene may be a problem.
It might also be possible to disable it in the BIOS.
Or if you're going through the effort to remove it, you might just unhook the tiny little connectors that connect the antennas to it.
I was thinking about recommending something like this but realized that Windows 10 might be a prerequisite because of some application needed to work with the files. That would then mean finding a way to provide the host OS access to the guest OS's filesystem in order to access those files.
I would be much more inclined to run Windows as a VM on a Linux box as the host OS, and to restrict stuff before Windows ever boots up.
Disable the wireless interface in the device manager. Or, look for the switch on the side of the computer that turns of the wireless, if it still has such a thing.