between the Slashdot effect and a DDOS attack. This looks like a willful attempt to crash their computer and drive their help around the bend; it's a DDOS.
Cease using the Apple name in conjunction with iTMS and iPod, and rather just use the name iTunes. I don't think Apple dba iTunes selling music steps on anyone's toes, unlike just plain Apple selling music evidently does.
You are quite right that the underclass cannot evidently enter into binding contracts in the US.
However, there is no license on a music CD. There is just copyright law.
My problem with Dell is that they tend to send you less than you paid for. I ordered a Dimension 8250 last December, which I am using to write this post. The sound card was not what they claimed and wouldn't accept Creative drivers, and I recently discovered that they didn't send a backup copy of Norton Antivirus as claimed.
Yeah, that'd be great. In my anthropology class we've been studying that sort of stuff, but with DNA...there are some tree diagrams of primates, so why not Unices?
I wasn't particularly bashing decrypting iTMS acquisitions through CD, but rather mentioning that you cannot sell an iTunes song as is. Also adding in that it's likely that the compression on the rip will be MP3, which is by its nature rather destructive.
You buy an album for a friend by either burning a CD for them and deleting your copy, or by buying it on their computer (but with your credit card). As for bequeathing your collection, you can leave your CD burns, and of course include in your will the instructions for finding your password, which you can carve into a piece of furniture or something.
Legal considerations are beside the point; it is very near impossible at this time to sell an iTunes song without also selling your Mac...and your credit card.
There's always ripping from a CD burn, but at that point it isn't an iTunes song, it's a below-quality CD rip.
And what I ask is...why not both?
I see the academic benefits of laptop computers...heck, I take ALL my college notes on an iBook...but I also see the benefits of teaching junior high kids how operating systems work, and how to use Unix. I mean...what ELSE is there to teach in junior high? I seem to recall that it's basically a holding tank.
The difference is that all of those have clear objectives besides simulating an actual situation.
Yes, the distinction I am making is a bit hazy, but I believe that simulation is a different thing from gaming.
I think not!
It's clearly a "crime simulator."
I don't consider Microsoft Flight Simulator a game -- it's clearly a simulation, as its rules amount to replicating the reality of air travel.
Grand Theft Auto clearly is attempting to replicate the reality of crime sprees, so why not just call it a crime sim?
But multiple choice is actually better than this.
Or just plain marking up wordprocessor files by the actual teacher. I'd hate it if my professors started using ordure like this, particularly for ENGLISH COMPOSITION. As far as I can tell, they can't get a GRAMMAR CHECKER anywhere near reliable, so an automatic essay grader is laughable!
And I never said anything about eliminating teachers in favor of "virtual classrooms," which I believe to be a crock. And frankly, if every student had a laptop, do you realize that:
(a) Papers could be graded faster
(b) Most cases of dysgraphia would be irrelevant to education.
(c) Class notes would tend to be more comprehensive, because typing is easier to do while listening.
Build your own computers, and that problem is gone. As for Office formats, that's a load of FUD; you can read those with open-source software.
"Infinium Labs" will say there's been a prototype for over twenty years, and that it's supported Linux for twelve.
It's multiple entities bombarding a system and/or institution with bogosity, with the evident intent of disrupting usual business.
Then it's a grey area. It's just a usual /.ing as much as anyone can see, but in truth it is a DDOS attack designed to crash a server.
between the Slashdot effect and a DDOS attack. This looks like a willful attempt to crash their computer and drive their help around the bend; it's a DDOS.
Cease using the Apple name in conjunction with iTMS and iPod, and rather just use the name iTunes. I don't think Apple dba iTunes selling music steps on anyone's toes, unlike just plain Apple selling music evidently does.
You are quite right that the underclass cannot evidently enter into binding contracts in the US. However, there is no license on a music CD. There is just copyright law.
I believe a certain Ari Deaubleigh or somesuch was the main artist who profited.
My problem with Dell is that they tend to send you less than you paid for. I ordered a Dimension 8250 last December, which I am using to write this post. The sound card was not what they claimed and wouldn't accept Creative drivers, and I recently discovered that they didn't send a backup copy of Norton Antivirus as claimed.
Yeah, that'd be great. In my anthropology class we've been studying that sort of stuff, but with DNA...there are some tree diagrams of primates, so why not Unices?
Nope, they're actually suing a 12-year-old, which would mean that POSSIBLY the suit is null and void, and another one needs to be filed.
I wasn't particularly bashing decrypting iTMS acquisitions through CD, but rather mentioning that you cannot sell an iTunes song as is. Also adding in that it's likely that the compression on the rip will be MP3, which is by its nature rather destructive.
You buy an album for a friend by either burning a CD for them and deleting your copy, or by buying it on their computer (but with your credit card). As for bequeathing your collection, you can leave your CD burns, and of course include in your will the instructions for finding your password, which you can carve into a piece of furniture or something.
Legal considerations are beside the point; it is very near impossible at this time to sell an iTunes song without also selling your Mac...and your credit card. There's always ripping from a CD burn, but at that point it isn't an iTunes song, it's a below-quality CD rip.
And what I ask is...why not both? I see the academic benefits of laptop computers...heck, I take ALL my college notes on an iBook...but I also see the benefits of teaching junior high kids how operating systems work, and how to use Unix. I mean...what ELSE is there to teach in junior high? I seem to recall that it's basically a holding tank.
The difference is that all of those have clear objectives besides simulating an actual situation. Yes, the distinction I am making is a bit hazy, but I believe that simulation is a different thing from gaming.
I think not! It's clearly a "crime simulator." I don't consider Microsoft Flight Simulator a game -- it's clearly a simulation, as its rules amount to replicating the reality of air travel. Grand Theft Auto clearly is attempting to replicate the reality of crime sprees, so why not just call it a crime sim?
ln /sbin/fsck google
And moreover password your PDA -- last I checked the manual for my Palm, the only way to remove the password is to wipe the PDA.
I, too, find myself using it, but I find that it has a rather high error rate for some situations.
Except that last I used the Word grammar checker, there were a noteworthy amount of false positives and negatives.
But multiple choice is actually better than this. Or just plain marking up wordprocessor files by the actual teacher. I'd hate it if my professors started using ordure like this, particularly for ENGLISH COMPOSITION. As far as I can tell, they can't get a GRAMMAR CHECKER anywhere near reliable, so an automatic essay grader is laughable!
Yep. They do as much damage, but noone tries to defend them.
And I never said anything about eliminating teachers in favor of "virtual classrooms," which I believe to be a crock. And frankly, if every student had a laptop, do you realize that: (a) Papers could be graded faster (b) Most cases of dysgraphia would be irrelevant to education. (c) Class notes would tend to be more comprehensive, because typing is easier to do while listening.
Teaching them grep and stuff couldn't hurt. It'd be more useful than two-column proofs, which NOONE ever uses.