Slashdot Mirror


More Linux Activity in German Government

__past__ writes "The decision of the bavarian capital city Munich to switch their desktop systems to Linux has caused a lot of discussion, and has been widely regarded as an important step for Linux on the desktop. And even if Microsoft tried hard to make their offerings more attractive since, including a special license contract that could save the public sector 'a lot of money' according to interior minister Otto Schily, it looks as if Munich was only the beginning."

"9 more cities in Rheinland-Pfalz, including the capital Mainz, are seriously considering to replace most, if not all of their Microsoft software with Linux after their current contracts expire in early 2004, noting that there are many other cities in a similar situation, and with similar plans.

Meanwhile, the police in Niedersachsen (german) is busy rolling out RedHat Linux on 11,620 desktops and 120 servers, running both standard Linux software and a custom information system called "Nivadis" based on WebLogic and Oracle running on Itanium servers, citing savings of about EUR 20 Mio compared with a Windows-based solution.

In a less desktop-related project, the state Mecklenburg-Vorpommern started a project with SuSE, IBM and others porting a mission-critical system called ProFiskal from Reliant Unix to Linux on zSeries, again citing cost as the primary reason, but also noting the benefits of using open standards for both software developers and users."

367 comments

  1. Start of a domino effect? by RayAlmostAnonymous · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If these initial deployments are successful, and the organizations see real benefits from their switch to Linux then it could be the start of a wave of Linux deployments across Europe, at least in public organizations such as these.

    However, if there are problems with some of them it could hold up the acceptance of Linux (etc.) for some while .... So we can only hope it goes well!

    1. Re:Start of a domino effect? by RoLi · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The more organizations deploy Linux, the lower the cost will become for further deployments.

      For example Munich will use VMWare while slowly porting their special Win-only software to Linux.

      The next generation will do without VMWare and will lower the cost to migrate to Linux.

      Oh, and I might add that 5 cities in Bavaria are also thinking in joining Munich directly.

      Also, in 3-4 years, if any hardware company will want to sell hardware to Europe or Asia, it will have to provide Linux drivers which will be beneficial for ALL Linux users.

    2. Re:Start of a domino effect? by aastanna · · Score: 1

      If there are problems with the deployment it will get giant coverage on slashdot and the open source developers will do their best to fix those problems. Better the problems are found and fixed now.

      That's the beauty of Linux, it's a dynamic evolving system.

  2. Metric and Imperial by AnimeFreak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It would be funny if the rest of world used Linux while the United States uses Windows. It would be just like the current state of measurement in this world, where the United States uses imperial and the rest of the world uses metric.

    1. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      UK uses 'imperial' too.

    2. Re:Metric and Imperial by AnimeFreak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The irony about the US and the UK using imperial is the fact that the US did everything it could to seperate itself from Great Britain, and that at the same time, they use imperial, which is the UK system derived from measurements set by the Royal Family.

      Hell, the measurement for a 'foot' was basically set by the length of the foot of the king at the time.

      What is the proper name for "imperial" anyway?

    3. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other than the structure of governement, the US never did anything to seperate itself from Anglo/British culture. 95% of our presidents have been pure WASP.

    4. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What is the proper name for "imperial" anyway?"

      "outdated". HTH HAND

    5. Re:Metric and Imperial by azzy · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's not entirely true. Think for a moment what 'imperial' actually means. They are the system of measurements spread by the British Empire. Though the UK has moved over to using many metric units, we still use miles and pints, indeed with the level of drunk driving we use both at the same time. Also many here still use pounds (lbs) as a measurement and farenheit for temperature.

      It would be speculation on my part, but I woldn't be too surprised if many other former members of the British Empire also use imperial measurements to this day.

    6. Re:Metric and Imperial by Michael+Wardle · · Score: 2, Informative

      What is the proper name for "imperial" anyway?

      In the US, they are more commonly referred to as English units .

    7. Re:Metric and Imperial by larien · · Score: 1
      FWIW, the Netherlands still sells beer in pints as well.

      As for Britain, yes, we still use many imperial measurements; I still think in terms of someone being 6 feet tall, etc, I still buy half a pound of ham in the supermarket, despite it officially being sold in kilos.

    8. Re:Metric and Imperial by tulare · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Which reminds me - I'd promised myself to lose two stone this year, and I've only made it halfway =[

      --
      political_news.c: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
    9. Re:Metric and Imperial by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      > FWIW, the Netherlands still sells beer in pints as well.

      While you may find many packaging units that are derived from original imperial units and even some daily usage of terms like (metric) pounds and ounces, it is in fact illegal for manufactures and traders to use these units in their communication.
      So your beer bottle will have its contents specified in cl (centiliter), not pints.

    10. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on!

      EVERYONE sells beer in pints.

    11. Re:Metric and Imperial by pe1chl · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That probably is because US citizens cannot think of any empire besides their own.

    12. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real irony is that the Royal Family is probably more popular in the USA than it is here in Britain ... maybe the USA should become a monarchy and the UK have another go at being a republic?

    13. Re:Metric and Imperial by MrMr · · Score: 1

      Yeah right.
      We've adopted the British Imperial units in 1974, just to spite the Germans.

      There cannot be enough disinformation on the web.

    14. Re:Metric and Imperial by jhunsake · · Score: 1

      If that's true, it's retarded. Who cares what someone measures their shit in? It's their shit, they should be able to do whatever they want to it. If they sell it, then the buyer can measure it in their own units beforehand.

    15. Re:Metric and Imperial by KillerHamster · · Score: 0, Redundant

      And if that happened, we could all come here to Slashdot and complain about it. Oh, wait...

    16. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I bet some Iraqi's thought they had an empire, but it turns out the US showed dominance once again!

    17. Re:Metric and Imperial by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      When they want to communicate their measurements to others, e.g. when trading, they have to do that in a standardized unit.
      It is required by law to use s.i. units for this.
      That is not retarded, the US is retarded.

    18. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost 60% of US citizens are of Germanic ancestry.

    19. Re:Metric and Imperial by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Yeah,

      but british miles are not american miles(or am I wrong?), definitly british pounds (lbs) are not american pounds, and british gallons are not american gallons and so on ....

      Finally: its unbeliveable that one wrecks a several hundred million space exploration probe because of a software error done by the programmres who could not compare a metric unit with a imperial unit correctly.

      I mean: in some industries it really makes sense to stick to imperial units.

      angel'o'sphere

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    20. Re:Metric and Imperial by weileong · · Score: 1

      Almost 60% of US citizens are of Germanic ancestry

      Is this actually true?

      That makes WWII ... almost like a civil war... .

    21. Re:Metric and Imperial by Kristoph · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall NASA loosing a spacecraft because one group used metric and the other imperial meashurements.

      It is in no way "retarded" to ensure there is a standard system of meshurement.

      ]{

    22. Re:Metric and Imperial by azzy · · Score: 1

      In some industrties it really makes sense to stick to SI units. That is units which have been internationally standardised.

    23. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, do you have any supporting evidence to back this up? Mr... Coward?

    24. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man , in the netherland when ever i asked for a "biertje" i got a tiny glass of beer. It improved when i learned to say "groote bier"

      -greg

    25. Re:Metric and Imperial by sniggly · · Score: 1

      Yeah let's sell the royal family to the americans! Maybe they can put Buckingham castle in DC and Balmoral castle in Beverly Hills!

      --
      Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
    26. Re:Metric and Imperial by pnot · · Score: 4, Funny
      > In the US, they are more commonly referred to as English units .

      ... which makes the whole mess even more hilarious, given the discrepancies even between U.S. and U.K. measurement. So, for example, an imperial pint (as used in England) is 568 ml, but an *English* pint (as used in the U.S. but, of course, never in England) is 454 ml.

      Mind you, if you were in England and mentioned an "English pint", people would generally assume you meant an "Imperial pint" (568 ml), whereas if you wanted to refer to an "English pint" as defined above, you'd probably call it an "American pint".

      Apoologies for using metric units in the above. A purist might have gone for the thoroughly intuitive original definition of the imperial pint, i.e. one-eighth of the volume of 10 lb of pure water at 62 degrees Fahrenheit. (And if you're going to ask whether that's a Troy, Avoirdupois or European pound, piss off.)

      Bleaugh. I think I need a pint now.

    27. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      SI is a French invention.

      Since we know how the French hate freedom and love dictators like Saddam, we'll only adopt the system if its name is changed to Freedom Units.

    28. Re:Metric and Imperial by GauteL · · Score: 1

      I've just moved to the UK, and I have found out that you are luckily being forced over to the metric system by the European Union.

      The pint will never leave, but in about 50 years people will think it is just a name for "beer".

      Most TV-channels now present Celcius first and Fahrenheit as an afterthought and all food are measured in grams first and foremost and imperial as an afterthought.

      It will take years for it to settle with the people, but formally England is firmly on it's way to a pure metric system.

    29. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely: you'll only adopt it if its name is changed to SA (Systeme Americain)...

    30. Re:Metric and Imperial by foobsr · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    31. Re:Metric and Imperial by Hoser+McMoose · · Score: 2, Informative

      In a lot of countries people have switched over to metric in a very half-assed manner, using metric (err, SI) units for some things and using imperial units for other things. I'm in Canada, and there are definitely a few definitely a few odd imperial measurements being thrown around.

      I think the pint is pretty much a standard for beer the world over. Here you can occasionally get quart bottles of beer as well (primarily in dive bars, such as the one I frequented last night, which had fine quarts of Molson Ex. and Labatt 50 :> ). Most places also tend to talk about people's height in terms of feet and inches, while weight is usually thought of in pounds here. We also have a rather odd tendency to think of water temperature (for pools, lakes, etc.) in farenheit while air temperature in Celcius.

      I was recently living in Ireland, and they are similarly half-assed converted to metric. They tend to talk about people's weight in stone, and many older Irish people I met seemed to have a very tough time with temps in Celcius, still sticking to farenheit. The one thing that really cracked me up there though was that all their speed limit signs and all the speed gauges in cars were always in miles/hour, but almost all of the distance signs on highways were in kilometers!

    32. Re:Metric and Imperial by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      AFAIK beer is now sold in metric pints, that is exactly half a liter. It was invented because everyone realised pints would never fall out of use, and it has the added bonus of being a slightly larger beer..

      Now we just need metric pounds and metric miles :)

    33. Re:Metric and Imperial by Illserve · · Score: 1

      Yes that would be hilarious.

      I'd laugh every day about it....

      *sigh*

    34. Re:Metric and Imperial by doktor-hladnjak · · Score: 1
      Now we just need metric pounds and metric miles.

      In Germany, there is such a thing as a metric pound. You can go into a bakery and ask for a "Pfund" loaf of bread and you'll get something that weighs 500g.

    35. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That is not retarded, the US is retarded.
      Shhh, it's supposed to be a secret!
    36. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean American Standards System, of course...

    37. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > and it has the added bonus of being a slightly larger beer

      I fear not.

      Pint > 500ml

    38. Re:Metric and Imperial by eyeye · · Score: 1

      I think they should also have some standard of spelling too.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    39. Re:Metric and Imperial by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1

      US Gallon != British Gallon

    40. Re:Metric and Imperial by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      LOL, yes, thats what I wanted to say ... my NOT disappeared.
      angel'o'sphere

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    41. Re:Metric and Imperial by Marcus+Green · · Score: 1

      Although most distance is still measured in miles there is a strong move away from imperial in the UK. Fuel (gas,petrol, diesel) is measured in litres, weights are in KG and g.

    42. Re:Metric and Imperial by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      Eeek! A Metric System flamefest.

      So if it's the better system, why does it take strict government edict, enforced standards, and strict laws to force it on the people?

      And what is the 'meter' based on again? Someone's flawed estimate of the radius of the earth, from back in the era of the Marquis DeSade and the other detris of the 'French Revolution'?

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    43. Re:Metric and Imperial by jhunsake · · Score: 1

      You just provided the same drivel over again. Provide one good logical reason why the government should be dictating how two companies should communicate about their potential trade.

    44. Re:Metric and Imperial by jhunsake · · Score: 1

      That is an internal fuck-up. We're talking about the government dictating how the public at large deals with measurement.

    45. Re:Metric and Imperial by pacman+on+prozac · · Score: 1

      "pint" already means "beer" really, pretty much everything else is sold in litres or gallons except for milk.

      Whats more worrying is that you can ask for a pint of "wife beater" in most English pubs and they'll know exactly what you mean. I think we're moving away from the metric system and into a slang-based system.

    46. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhhhh. But pounds (lbs) and Kilograms (kg) are not the same type of unit.

      Kilogram is a unit of mass and it to get a unit of weight(force) you need to multiply it to the unit of accelleration, namely the force of gravity here on earth. Force=Mass*Accelleration A fifty Kg brick on earth would still be 50 Kg on the moon but it's resultant force would be less. It is only assumed that when you say something weighs 50 Kg it is taken for granted you mean 50 Kg under the accelleration of gravity on earth though to the enginering/scientific world they would express it in terms of force or Newtons.

      Pounds ar a unit of force on a person, namly the mass of a person pulled by the force of gravity. A fifty pound brick on earth would not weigh fifty pounds on the moon where the force of gravity is less.

      It is interesting to note that the imperial unit of mass is called the "slug" I can see how we don't use that term as I can alredy see the reaction of my wife (and resultant divorce) when I mention any extra slugs she may have gained over the holidays. "I drank WHAT!?!" --Socrates

    47. Re:Metric and Imperial by yoghurt · · Score: 1

      The United States does not use imperial units. Volume measurements are different. 1 US gallon is not equal to 1 imperial gallon. A US pint is smaller than what you get in Britain.

      --
      Yoghurt
    48. Re:Metric and Imperial by dash2 · · Score: 1

      Here's one: forcing companies to sell to customers using standard units allows easier comparison between different offerings, which reduces transaction costs and brings us closer to ideal free-market conditions of perfect information. In other words, if every pub sells pints - or indeed half-litres - it's easier for me to figure out which pubs are cheaper.

    49. Re:Metric and Imperial by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      When you don't enforce standard units, companies can invent their own units or use imperial units to conceal a price difference. This is considered unfair.

      These laws are mainly there to protect consumers against companies. But between companies the same issues arise.

    50. Re:Metric and Imperial by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      So if it's the better system, why does it take strict government edict, enforced standards, and strict laws to force it on the people?

      It doesn't.
      The system was in place decades before laws enforced it.

    51. Re:Metric and Imperial by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      Imperial pint > 500ml > American pint

      I'm sure that means something, but I have no idea what.

    52. Re:Metric and Imperial by jhunsake · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of buyer beware? If I advertise my Cola product as being 2 WhatEvers, then it's your obligation to find out what a WhatEver equals, not buy the product, or buy it knowing that you don't know how much it is. God, people want the government to hold their hand through everything nowadays.

    53. Re:Metric and Imperial by jhunsake · · Score: 1

      It brings you no closer to anything. If the pubs idea of a pint is a little less than another pubs idea, then they can simply add water to equal it out. You can look at something, or measure it yourself, to see if you want it.

    54. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I wonder how many people know that the "mile" measurement that is used in the States is REALLY old. It is based loosely on the distance that could be covered by a Roman Legionnaire in 1000 paces ( a mille passus, which was about 4800 feet).

    55. Re:Metric and Imperial by dash2 · · Score: 1

      "Measuring it yourself" is exactly the sort of transaction cost that the law would eradicate. Your point about watering beer suggests another useful government intervention - don't let pubs water down beer. (Because the beer is sold under a brand name, this is an example of government intervention to prevent a prisoner's dilemma situation emerging where everybody waters down beer to take advantage of the brand name that is supported by other pubs' full strength version. Obviously pubs are free to make their own, weak beer. However, it's simpler to compare products when some of the inputs are held similar between products - to compare two pints of beer which have different prices, strengths and taste, rather than comparing two glasses of beer which have all the above as well as different amounts.)

    56. Re:Metric and Imperial by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Tell that to your government when they talk about software patents and copyright acts.

    57. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many people mourn the encroach of the English language into the native languages of many countries, yet try to force the metric system to the loss of currently-used units. Huh?

    58. Re:Metric and Imperial by msoftsucks · · Score: 1

      Well, I'd rather be using a system from the UK than the cowardly,snobass,passed their prime French. The metric system has been develeped and is maintained by them.

      --
      Quit playing Monopoly with Bill.
      Linux - of the people, by the people, and for the people.
    59. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, the Netherlands still sells beer in pints as well.

      We stopped using that two centuries ago, but
      with the influx of price-ignorant Anglo-Saxons
      we started selling them again. Mostly for
      double the price of a comparable amount
      of metrically ordered beer (i.e. 'halve liter').

      (This is a joke. well sort of.)

    60. Re:Metric and Imperial by jhunsake · · Score: 1

      So in other words, you want the government to make life simpler for you? Yeah, right.

    61. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> 95% of our presidents have been pure WASP.

      Those who wish to run for president can do so and they get voted in.

    62. Re:Metric and Imperial by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

      I could feign ignorance and say: "What! kidney stones ? Thats a hard way to lose weight".

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    63. Re:Metric and Imperial by dash2 · · Score: 1

      Indeed I do. I am such a crazy, statist, left winger that I don't want to measure all my own pints. Bet you get some funny looks when you go down the pub.

    64. Re:Metric and Imperial by jhunsake · · Score: 1

      No, I just don't care. If the glass is a reasonable size and it's reasonably full, who gives a shit? Are you so worried they're gonna short you a few ml or 1/64 of a pint or something?

    65. Re:Metric and Imperial by elgaard · · Score: 1

      >I think the pint is pretty much a standard for beer the world over.

      It might be a standard, but it is not very well defined. I was in Portugal this summer. I was not too happy about until i found out that in many places you could buy a "small pint" or "big pint" of beer.

      Many places ordering a pint will get you 0.5 liter

    66. Re:Metric and Imperial by ImpTech · · Score: 1

      Dammit! I had no idea the definition of "pint" was different between the US and UK. I've been getting ripped off by bartenders for years!

    67. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      UK uses 'imperial' too.

      UK is taking up the metric system. Haven't you followed the recent criminal prosecutions of greengrocers who were still selling things in pounds and ounces?

    68. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What is the proper name for "imperial" anyway?

      'Imperial.' And that's quite apposite when you consider that practically noone except the Americans are using it nowadays, don't you think?

    69. Re:Metric and Imperial by lithiumcloud · · Score: 1

      Not again... Please... no...

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    70. Re:Metric and Imperial by Capsaicin · · Score: 1
      So in other words, you want the government to make life simpler for you?

      Well in a Democracy, or even in a democratic Republic, the government belongs to the people. So naturally the people want to government to do their bidding. Why have servants, unless they make life easier for us?

      Or do you prefer a government that makes life more difficult for you?

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
    71. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think they should also have some standard of spelling too.

      I vote that we adopt 'meshurement' as the standard!

    72. Re:Metric and Imperial by Eivind · · Score: 1
      That's a good reason, yes.

      To get even closer to this ideal, it's becoming increasingly common in Europe (atleast in Norway, Denmark and Germany which is what I've visited lately) for all goods to have price given for a decadic unit.

      So, a price-label will typically say something along the lines of: "3.22 pr. 3dl bottle (10.73/liter)" which makes it a lot easier to compare the real price to other bottles of different size.

    73. Re:Metric and Imperial by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      It will take years for it to settle with the people, but formally England is firmly on it's way to a pure metric system.

      Australia went metric about 1970. After a transition period of dual measurements, they made Imperial units obsolete. Once you don't have the crutch of waiting to hear the temp in F instead of C, for instance, you quickly adapt to the new units. You'll never make it if you don't strongly discourage old units, as making shop scales, for instance, illegal if not in kilos. You don't have to get KGB about it, there are enough regulations on weights and measures already that can be enforced fro retail sales, cosntruction, etc.

    74. Re:Metric and Imperial by mpe · · Score: 1

      AFAIK beer is now sold in metric pints, that is exactly half a liter. It was invented because everyone realised pints would never fall out of use, and it has the added bonus of being a slightly larger beer..

      Only compared with the American pint, which is 400 odd ml. The Imperial pint is 568ml. Though the term "liter" could refer to just about anything, since it isn't either a metric or an SI unit.

    75. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real irony is that the Royal Family is probably more popular in the USA than it is here in Britain ... maybe the USA should become a monarchy

      Some would say that this has already happened.

    76. Re:Metric and Imperial by mpe · · Score: 1

      'Imperial.' And that's quite apposite when you consider that practically noone except the Americans are using it nowadays, don't you think?

      The system used in the US is similar to Imperial, but not quite the same. However the US hasn't quite got the hang of being an Imperial power even with over a century of practice. (You'd think that would be long enough to get over the shock of beating Spain...)

    77. Re:Metric and Imperial by hplasm · · Score: 1

      What the hell else are they there for? ( I know that they have forgotten this a long time ago..)

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    78. Re:Metric and Imperial by hplasm · · Score: 1

      ASS..?

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    79. Re:Metric and Imperial by jhunsake · · Score: 1

      As another reply to my post acknowledge, and which you were apparently to dense to discern, is that I was alluding to the fact the government, in an attempt to make life easier, does in fact make life more difficult.

    80. Re:Metric and Imperial by dash2 · · Score: 1

      very reasonable - although I might equally say that I find it hard to get too worked up about the "infringement of my freedom" from beer being sold in pints. But this issue isn't just about pints of beer, it holds true for much bigger trades, where the transaction costs are correspondingly greater. Pints were just an example.

    81. Re:Metric and Imperial by Capsaicin · · Score: 1
      ... which you were apparently to (sic.) dense to discern ...

      You're quite the skilled debater, aren't you?

      I was alluding to the fact the government, in an attempt to make life easier, does in fact make life more difficult.

      That is no fact, that is a generalisation. And it' s a false generalisation at that. Take a vacation from your ideology for just a moment and have a look at the real world. Note what happens when there is a total collapse of state functionality. Now put your hand on your heart and tell yourself that life under those conditions really is easier. Now stop lying to yourself!

      It is true that some of the best intentions can, and do, go horribly wrong. It is even more true that those who succeed in laying their hands on political power do not necessary have the best intentions. This is what makes the democratic process so important. As Karl Popper observed, the strength of democracy lies not in the fact that we can elect people to power, but that we can elect to throw them out.

      That being said, it is also true that the good intentions of our elected representatives can, and do, result in good outcomes. As an example of this you need look no further than to the government sponsored introduction of standards for weights and measures, and all the obvious economic benefits that flow from such standards.

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
    82. Re:Metric and Imperial by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Though the term "liter" could refer to just about anything, since it isn't either a metric or an SI unit.

      Yes, it is. But english and americans misspell it all the time. The metric and SI term for what you call a litre is a liter. Sorry :)

    83. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have the 1.09/kg things here in the UK too, along with 0.59/meter etc etc (although annoyingly Tesco's have some things at 59p/lb and others at 0.59/kg - annoying when your trying to suss out the most expensive

      Anyways the younger generation would look blankly if you ask they for
      3 inch of what not
      2 foot of cotton what
      or says it's 69Farenheight...

      it's 17c, i'm 1meter92, the time is 16:41 and my cheese weighs 400grammes. Now where's my 2 liter bottle of water, or 33cl can of coke?

      Anyways, as for a standard mesure - the reason for having them is to prevent errors being brought in through the constant conversion - Eurospace Agency Metric and NASA Imperial mesure = some space craft (i think?) crashing(?) into the red planet - whoops!

    84. Re:Metric and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite, one place (Austrian themed bar) in the UK is getting taken to court for selling traditional austrian beer in Liter Glasses.... No doubt these will be taken to the same courts who try greengrocers who sell bananas in lbs.

      Anyways who's great idea was it to name the currency and wieght the same?
      Pounds weight = lbs
      Pounds money = UKP

      Jeez, Metrification and the EUR will zap that problem :)

  3. and SCO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Making a killing from "licencing fees" on all those illegal Linux boxes

    Just my stab at SCO for the day.

    1. Re:and SCO... by Elektroschock · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In Germany Sco.de was stopped by munich district court. They may not spill anti-competitive statements against Linux. And they already had to pay a penalty. Sco.de also doesn't sell these doubtful licenses.

    2. Re:and SCO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because the DoJ can't fail in germany ;-)

    3. Re:and SCO... by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      No, courts are independent from Government.

      Divisions of power, i guess the same applies for other countries...

      I am disappointed about my DOJ as it promoted software patents in Europe...

      Lawyers - your poison for information society

    4. Re:and SCO... by MKalus · · Score: 1

      Lawyers - your poison for information society

      This reminds me of one of the Simpsons Treehouse of Horror episodes (last year?).

      Where Lisa walks out of the house in the beginning (with Bart being a Vampire and such) and she holds a book in her hands titled "Copyright Law".

      Simpsons might not be "as good" as they were once, but they can still pack a punch at times (of couse I am sure 99% of the audience didn't "get it".

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  4. Re:goatse by lanswitch · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    what kind of plugin do i need to run linux on that?

  5. More Communist Activity in German Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    AC writes "The decision of the bavarian capital city Munich to switch their political systems to Communism has caused a lot of discussion, and has been widely regarded as an important step for Communism in Germany. And even if the Nazis tried hard to make their offerings more attractive since, including a special license contract killing that could save the public sector 'a lot of money' according to interior minister Bill Gatez, it looks as if Munich was only the beginning."

    It's easy when you know how.

  6. Microsoft can't win by cutting prices by silentbozo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The more they cut prices in order to stave off linux, the more evident it is how overpriced their list prices are. Instead of trying to compete on price, they should be trying to compete on features such as easy management, and security...

    Unfortunately for Microsoft, security isn't exactly their strength, and neither is easy management now that Linux has matured so much.

    1. Re:Microsoft can't win by cutting prices by tulare · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So true, so true. Where I work, it's possible to buy M$ Office for $41.40 a seat. Now tell me they aren't overcharging everyone else.

      --
      political_news.c: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
    2. Re:Microsoft can't win by cutting prices by Arrepiadd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is it Office XP? If it is, I'll buy you 40 copies of it. The computers for students on my university department have been waiting for the funds for Microsoft XP for a while... At that price, I'll buy it myself!

      But, more seriously, that was something that intrigued me about Munich! If they lowered the price alot, wouldn't the rest of the world see what they were doing to the rest of us? Now we now that at Microsoft, burning cds isn't that expensive anymore...

    3. Re:Microsoft can't win by cutting prices by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

      Likewise.. I work in Further Education and the 'Select' prices we are offered just prove how much they are ripping off the general public for copies of Office and Windows.

      And when it comes to server applications its even worse. I believe a license for Exchange Server 2003 Enterprise costs us something stupid like $200, and SQL Server 2000 is like $20.. i'm not 100% sure but I know they are silly prices.

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    4. Re:Microsoft can't win by cutting prices by sniggly · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Most people are far too stupid to realize that the 70% (*) profit microsoft makes on office and windows is straight out of their pocket and caused by the ms monopoly on office document standard. If they cut off 70%, sell it over the web (no boxes, shrink wrap & distribution costs) they'd still make a profit per unit. That's how sun does it.

      Your department should really look at staroffice or openoffice.org. It opens almost any ms office document, and has database support as well. It's a free download....

      (*) something like 70%, google knows.

      --
      Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
    5. Re:Microsoft can't win by cutting prices by b-lou · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Agree, however what MS is really good at is making money. With Linux they can't simply do their "if you can't beat `em then buy `em" strategy. But if everyone's running Linux how will MS make money? They'll start writing Linux apps, port MS Office to Linux (I'd buy that one myself), even release an MS Linux distro. It's not going to happen tomorrow, but I don't see what other choice they'll have in the long run. Remember who the biggest software producer for Apple is: Microsoft.

    6. Re:Microsoft can't win by cutting prices by RoLi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The fact is that Microsoft is doomed.

      What does Windows really offer over Linux?

      • it is preinstalled
      • it runs more software esp games
      • there are more/cheaper admins for it
      • it runs more consumer peripherals

      To sum it all up, the only advantage Windows has over Linux is being better established.

      Munich will use VMWare while their apps are being ported/rewritten for Linux. In 4-5 years VMWare will no longer be needed by Munich or any other city that might think of switching.

      To sum that up, Munich is establishing Linux in the governmental sector.

      Or to put it in another way, Windows loses their only advantage. Windows might be marginally cheaper with special Ballmer-discounts when compared to a Linux-VMWare solution, but it won't have a chance compared to a clean Linux solution when all apps are available. And with no advantage left, Windows will become a legacy-platform like OS/2.

      That's why Microsoft is so desperate about not losing a single seemingly unimportant contract. That's why Microsoft is doomed in the end.

    7. Re:Microsoft can't win by cutting prices by tulare · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, Exchange is $271, I'm too lazy at the moment to look up SQL, but it's insanely cheap as well - insane only compared to the monopoly-inflated retail prices. Honestly, $271 seems resonable to me for a full-featured mail and calendar package... any apparent bargain in that price is offset by the horribly high TCO, higher hardware requirements, and intangible "hassle factor" that goes with any windows app that you intend to make front-facing.

      --
      political_news.c: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
    8. Re:Microsoft can't win by cutting prices by Bastian · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unfortunately for Microsoft, security isn't exactly their strength

      I dunno. .. the 8-bit XOR model used for the password encryption on Win95 was pretty impressive.

      I still remember the day I decrypted the passwords on my computer in a few minutes using a pencil and paper. I thought to myself, "Damn, THAT's the company I want to trust with keeping MY important and often confidential business information safe!"

    9. Re:Microsoft can't win by cutting prices by jd142 · · Score: 1

      Be careful though, sometimes those educational prices are a result of a deal done by your university with MS. For example, our university pays millions of dollars each year to MS, and as a result we get to "rent" office, visual studio, and operating systems for the price of the media. We also have unlimited CALS. The millions that we pay come in part through an increase in student computer fees, never mind that most students have office bundled on the computer they buy from gateway or dell and that's more software than they need anyway. I think the increase in student computer fees was around $100 a year, which means students paid $400 to rent software they could have bought for the same price or that they already owned.

      And it is truly a rental, because as soon as you graduate or leave tun U, you are no longer licensed to use the product. Or as soon as MS and the U fail to renew their contract.

    10. Re:Microsoft can't win by cutting prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They told me it was only US $10,000.00 for one processor. You guys are getting off C H E A P!!

    11. Re:Microsoft can't win by cutting prices by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Wanted: One

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    12. Re:Microsoft can't win by cutting prices by Trelane · · Score: 1

      Almost.

      At least, at my Uni, there is one way to keep your license (note, still ain't yours)--you graduate. Anything else, and all money you've given up is gone and you get nothing.

      You drop out for a year? Gone.
      You flunk out? Gone.
      School decides it's not worth it anymore? Gone. (and they're extra susceptible to audits!)
      Microsoft stops the agreement for any reason? Gone.
      (check that one; I believe it's accurate).
      Microsoft determines that your Uni is somehow in breech of contract? Gone.

      What's more, they've just opened up a pandora's box of possiblities w.r.t. auditing the school and inspection, the EULA of the software aside. Microsoft now has access to student IP via inspecting their computers, as well as to the researchers' computers. Yay!

      In addition, over the course of your schooling, you've already paid through the nose ($50-$70 or so per semester) for software you likely wouldn't have bought anyway! How many of us are still using Win98 for their desktop and Office 97 for their productivity software?!

      Personally, I think it's insane. We've already seen Microsoft's attitude towards schools--audit 'em even when they're in financial trouble, and use it to force 'em into new licensing agreements. The schools have made a deal with the Devil, truly.

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    13. Re:Microsoft can't win by cutting prices by Trelane · · Score: 1

      Me again. You can tell I have issues with this program. ;)

      What's more, it's a one-way street. It's very easy to sign up, once you sell the campus privilege fee increase to students.

      Once signed up for a while, students, faculty, and staff have started receiving the software, and it's thoroughly embedded throughout the school. At that point, the school is under immense pressure to remain in the program, or students, faculty, and staff will be angry about having to give back the software, and about all the hundreds of dollars of theirs that's gone down the drain (justifiably so).

      On top of that, you're going to be open to licensing compliants audits by Microsoft and the BSA unless (or in spite of!) draconian inspections of the student, faculty, and staff work and home computers!

      It's a tarbaby.

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    14. Re:Microsoft can't win by cutting prices by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Mr. Customer. You shouldn't focus on the price, because ours is high.

      You should focus on the fact that you're buying the Microsoft name.

      That means Quality. If you buy our software, you will be getting the level of quality, robustness, reliability, scalability, security and technical support that you've come to expect from Microsoft.

      --

      Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
    15. Re:Microsoft can't win by cutting prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they should be trying to compete on features such as easy management, and security

      The problem for Microsoft is that security is not a feature. It's an emergent property of fundamental design decisions. If it were just a feature, it could be bolted on after the fact, and Trusted Computing would have already proven itself to be an effectable strategy.

    16. Re:Microsoft can't win by cutting prices by mpe · · Score: 1

      What does Windows really offer over Linux?

      * it is preinstalled
      * it runs more software esp games
      * there are more/cheaper admins for it
      * it runs more consumer peripherals
      To sum it all up, the only advantage Windows has over Linux is being better established.


      Of this list only the 3rd item is especially relevent to corporate usage. Numbers 2 and 4 are only relevent at all to home users. As is to a large extent is the first one.

    17. Re:Microsoft can't win by cutting prices by zelurxunil · · Score: 1

      Microsoft can't win by cutting prices because they can never meet the Microsoft business ideals if they where giving out software....which would be the only way for them to compete.

      --

      What's another word for Thesaurus?
      -Steve Wright
  7. Re:Will.. by jhunsake · · Score: 0, Troll

    More like Capitalist (Microsoft) vs Socialist (Linux).

    Sure, mod me down, but you still know it's true.

  8. United States doesn't care. by CherniyVolk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While historically (as short as that may be), people
    ventured to America for myriad reasons; political,
    religious, economic, prosperity etc. Many of those
    things aren't really tangible except in the minds of
    the people. The first time in America's history,
    people migrate to Russia, Europe and China for
    technological freedom among other associative
    properties like jobs. I'm certainly keeping my
    options open, getting a CE degree what good is
    it in America when all the jobs are going overseas?

    Maybe there is some use to the two years of foriegn language required in US academic institutions.

    1. Re:United States doesn't care. by doktor-hladnjak · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry, but I have to call BS on this. First of all, lots of people (even today, when there's a hightened level of anti-American sentiment) immigrate to the US. We're talking hundreds of thousands of people coming every year for said polical, religious, economic, and prosperity reasons. Granted in the past couple years the economy has gone down, unemployment is up, DMCA bullshit is going on, John Aschroft et al are gnawing away at our civil liberties. However, the situation in the US is still much better than in the majority of the nations of the world, which is why people keep coming.

      It has been my experience that when you talk to various people from around the world, all of them either a) know somebody who left their country permanently to move to the US or b) know somebody who knows somebody who did. Now, if you go ask Americans, how many of them would know fellow Americans that did the same thing? I'm not talking about people who move somewhere for a couple of years either. I'm talking about true permanent immigration. It's a rare phenomenon, especially for anybody who's family has been in America for more than a generation.

      I've only known one person who has moved out of the US with the intent to never move back. She's been living in Britain now for about 3 years, but still she might come back someday, since for now she's not a permanent resident there. There are certainly other people like her, but like I said they're rare. They're not however moving to places like Russia or China and certainly not places like sub-sarahan Africa. I'll bet you almost anything that 99%+ of the people who do move permantently to a place like Russia or China, either originally came from there or have close family connections there.

      As much as we bitch about how the US going down the tubes, Americans still enjoy a good deal of economic and political freedom, while living one of the highest qualities of living in the world.

    2. Re:United States doesn't care. by Dever · · Score: 1

      [...] As much as we bitch about how the US going down the tubes, Americans still enjoy a good deal of economic and political freedom, while living one of the highest qualities of living in the world.
      ---

      That's well and nice, but for how long will we enjoy this relative utopia? will we not eventually succeed in having gone down the tubes?

      So we enjoy a good deal of economic and political freedom? More than we enjoyed last year? Two or even three years ago? What about five years ago?

      Do you think this trend will continue or do you pray to the crystal cathedral that Christ will return and give us our liberties back?

      It's rather useless to say how fine things are because they haven't gotten worse yet, while you admit (or perhaps you think everyone is bitching about nothing) that they are getting worse, and will continue that way barring some large improbable catastrophic scale event of good luck.

      I love hearing people tell me how fabulous this country is concerning liberties and quality of life, as we all hear the loudest pneumatic toilet sound and watch our previously taken-for-granted liberties go down the drain. I absolutely love the quality of life too. It's not as if our draconian drug laws and blatant hypcocrisy are putting half of the current 18-35 year olds in prison, having our lives run by huge corporations and trade groups, or are blessed with some of the finest examples of muddled law in the world.

      No, lifes just dandy. If I can drink my cheap swill and watch the game, I'm doing ok. I stay informed with Fox News and can honestly say I'm a responsible citizen of the world, living in the country that smells the least (you wish) of shit.

      I mean, it might be shitty smelling, but it's not as shitty smelling as everyone else.


      -Dev

      --
      - I'd prefer not to.
  9. Software Patents by Elektroschock · · Score: 5, Informative

    And thanks to Munich FFII Germany has the strongest anti-swpat movement...

    In Munich they demontrated together with a social democrat politician Lochner-Fischer (Member of Bavarian House of representatives) that capaigned for Linux! See this picture with her election campaign banners.

    Also European MEP Wolfgang Kreissl-Dorfler hold a speech at FFII demo munich.

    German Wiki page about Munich demo

    Note: As a Northern German I don't like Bavarian culture, but Munich is special, less ultra-conservative than the rest of Bavaria. As an European I am proud of the leading role of Europe in the current silent Open Source revolution.

    1. Re:Software Patents by flacco · · Score: 1
      Note: As a Northern German I don't like Bavarian culture, but Munich is special, less ultra-conservative than the rest of Bavaria. As an European I am proud of the leading role of Europe in the current silent Open Source revolution.

      I was born in Munich and lived in Bavaria for the first couple years of my life. Strictly out of curiosity - what are the cultural differences between Northern/Southern germans?

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    2. Re:Software Patents by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      Read CSU-Bayernkurier Feuilleton! Read IT policy proposals by CSU. I remind you that 2/3 elect this party; this and a 91% vote is regarded as a sign of strength, part of the so called "Geschlossenheit" ideology. I think Northern Germans are more liberal. Lever dod as slaav. And of course: Bavarians are sooo proud of themselves and their currupt system. Take their "Zentralabitur" as an example. In Bavaria it would have been far more easier for me. Every year similar simple questions while I had to learn more and teachers had more freedom. Of course there are also bad comprehensive schools with lower standards, but... Well, just read the PISA nonsense propaganda... An uneducated man like Stoiber as a chancellor, Beckstein as minister of interior, I would go abroad...

    3. Re:Software Patents by ahillen · · Score: 1

      I dont think that Bavarian culture and live in Bavaria in general is defined by the Bayernkurier. People in Bavaria are more diverse than you might expect, and I think it is strange that someone who calls himself liberal (at least thats what I have read from your post) is so prejudiced about a whole group of people.

      Well, and I dont understand your problem with the Zentralabitur. I dont see why the questions in a Zentralabitur should be more similar year to year, and I also dont see why it is more difficult if a teacher selects the questions for his pupils himself instead of getting a common set of questions which are based on suggestions from teachers all over the state. If you teacher didnt like your class, it might be more difficult, if he/she liked your class, you might be actually better of... ;)

    4. Re:Software Patents by sniggly · · Score: 1

      If you mix Swedes Danes & Dutch, you pretty much have north(western) germans (Hamburg). If you take Italians, French & Chechs, mix them and add some beer, you have Bayern (Munchen). It's certainly not that crude but the differences between traditional cultures in Germany are pronounced and this diversity makes Germany a very fun and surprising country to visit.

      --
      Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
    5. Re:Software Patents by bj8rn · · Score: 1
      Obligatory Illuminatus! quote:

      This is the dawning of the Age of Bavaria --
      Age of Bavaria --
      Bavaria -- Bavaria!

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    6. Re:Software Patents by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 1
      Where do you think the local gene-pool got contributions from? From the neighbouring states, of course. It's the same thing near the Mexican border in the USA and in Flordia (Cuba), for instance.

      People are so used to seeing sharp geographical and national borders and to the underlying "us vs. them" mentality of a nation state that they expect that the character of the population change abruptly at the border.

      This, of course, is complete nonsense and only serves to emphasize how ridiculous the entire concept of a nation state is. Borders should be torn down. EU's Schengen-treaty (=no border checks within the union) is a good start, but that's only inside the EU. What we need is the complete dissolution of the national borders all around the world.

    7. Re:Software Patents by sniggly · · Score: 1

      Yes that was pretty much my point.. Maybe i should spell every single one of my thoughts out next time so my point would be totally clear to everyone including slashdot's favourite pet troll :P

      --
      Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
    8. Re:Software Patents by Wastl · · Score: 1

      Especially since Bavaria's ruling party (CSU - christian conservative) today got a 2/3 majority. (and note: this is NOT the party ruling the city of Munich!). People are soo stupid sometimes. Good night democracy.

      Somewhat frustrated,
      Sebastian

  10. Re:Will.. by vinsci · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Which part of billions of dollars in Linux revenue don't you understand?

    --

    Trusted Computing FAQ | Free Dawit Isaak!
  11. Hopefully they will not not screw up the thing ... by foobsr · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... since here (Germany) exists (at least from my point of view) the tradition to invest large amounts of money in 'government software projects' that turn out to be scrap in the end. If it works fine, this for sure will boost the acceptance of LINUX since the public sector (still) is an important customer to deal with. CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  12. Re:Will.. by azzy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Surely Capitalism should be contrasted to Communism as opposed to Socialism? One can have a capitalist and socialist system. eg the Labour party in the UK is socialist (ok, you can stop laughing now) yet the system is still capitalist.

    A better comparison would be between conservatism (sticking to the old ways) and socialism (supposedly fairer and more inclusive of society).

  13. Re:Will.. by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 1, Insightful
    And pray tell me where are the "billions of dollars"? RedHat is barely in the black thanks to their per seat licensing (exactly the model Microsoft uses) of their enterprise solution - the other distros are surviving on mere charity and volunteer work.

    Or are you referring to the future profits that will bring to someone?

  14. Savings? by nacturation · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...citing savings of about EUR 20 Mio compared with a Windows-based solution.

    Is that 20 M Euros or 20 Mibi-Euros? Either 20.000.000 EUR or 20.971.520 EUR. It's important to know these things.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  15. Re:Will.. by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Insightful
    >>More like Capitalist (Microsoft) vs Socialist (Linux).

    More like Coercive (Microsoft) vs. Cooperative (Linux).

    All them little Marxists at IBM seem to be in agreement. ;-)

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  16. Re:Will.. by colonel.sys · · Score: 1
    I guess you could say that but I'd rather put it like this: The idea of free software may in parts go along with the idea of socialism. But then again we all know that the real existing socialism never had anything to do with its initial ideas.

    So it's more like free speech vs. government / corporation power. Liberalism if you will. Very soon quite a few corporations will be as powerful as governments anyway and some already are.

    --
    We are all individualists!
  17. Re:Open source browsers stopped working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If you're on an NT-descended Windows, look in the event viewer. The cause of the problem may be there. Also check the task manager: if you see mozilla there, kill it and restart the app. Winamp 2.91 freezes on me like that sometimes. I have to kill the program through the task manager, and then it mysteriously starts without a hitch.

  18. I'm afraid not buddy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We were a former colony and have been using metric units for a long time. People would laugh if you used Farenheit.

  19. People are speaking out. by Agent+R · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is indeed only the beginning. People all over the globe are becoming sick of paying big bucks for buggy OSes. (Particularly the kind of OS that forces reboots for program crashes.)

    Microsoft better get their act together if they intend on staying competitive. Linux is slowly eroding their market share.

    --
    !@#$% whole-grain cereal. When I want fiber, I eat some wicker furniture. - G. Carlin
    1. Re:People are speaking out. by mark_space2001 · · Score: 1
      This is indeed only the beginning. People all over the globe are becoming sick of paying big bucks for buggy OSes. (Particularly the kind of OS that forces reboots for program crashes.)

      Damn straight! I want my buggy software for free!!

      Vive le revolution!

      *burp*

      Now where's my free beer?

    2. Re:People are speaking out. by Agent+R · · Score: 1

      Why settle for free buggy software when Linux IS free for download? :-)

      --
      !@#$% whole-grain cereal. When I want fiber, I eat some wicker furniture. - G. Carlin
  20. Re:Will.. by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 1
    More like Coercive (Microsoft) vs. Cooperative (Linux).

    How is Microsoft coercive? No-one's forcing you to buy and use their software.

  21. Re:Will.. by vinsci · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From this eWEEK article:
    For the year, IBM calculated Linux sales of $1 billion, inducing HP's Carly Fiorina to make a more extravagant claim of $2 billion in Linux revenue at HP.
    That was article dated February 3rd, 2003, so by now those numbers are likely significantly higher.
    --

    Trusted Computing FAQ | Free Dawit Isaak!
  22. Re:Why is anyone looking @ Slashdot? by Omicron32 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    1) Why are you here refreshing Slashdot at 2.30 in the morning. 2) There are other countries besides your own. Guess what, we all live in different timezones. Just proves that Americans assume the world revolves around them.

  23. One word about Lochner-Fischer by presroi · · Score: 1, Troll
    Monika Lochner-Fischer

    http://www.lochner-fischer.de/themel/linux1.htm

    Lets's have a look at the source code....(http://www.lochner-fischer.de/the/thefri0 2.htm)
    <head>
    <meta HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
    <meta NAME="Generator" CONTENT="Microsoft Word 97">
    <title>"Wirtschaftspolitik"</title>
    </head>
    1. Re:One word about Lochner-Fischer by Bananenrepublik · · Score: 3, Informative
      Funny you should say that, in the page I get it says:
      <meta HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <meta NAME="Generator" CONTENT="handmade, handcraft"> <title>"Wirtschaftspolitik, Linux, Open-Source-Software, Entscheidung Muenchen, Microsoft"</title>
    2. Re:One word about Lochner-Fischer by orangeguru · · Score: 1

      I would call this beating the enemy with his own weapons.

    3. Re:One word about Lochner-Fischer by TheTimoo · · Score: 1

      you need to look at the other URL. I didn't get why he posted two URLs, but he is actually correct. :-)

      --
      "Be careful or be roadkill" - Calvin
  24. At least one western country by Krapangor · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    which isn't totally owned by the industry and where the goverment strives to work in the interest of their citizens. The situation in the US is much worse they even start wars just to give some companies more revenues. This makes me wonder when France starts to adopt Linux.

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
    1. Re:At least one western country by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      In France it is always very important that all your software is translated to the local language.
      You will probably see increased use there once that has been completed.

    2. Re:At least one western country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, as long as US companies and US lobbying doesn't "adopt" France there is certainly a chance that this might be happen in the future. At the moment germany is something like a guinea pig for other european countries when it comes to Linux vs. MS matters.

    3. Re:At least one western country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like MandrakeSoft S.A. has had for over half a decade? Mandrake is a French linux. The lack of Linux adoption in France perhaps is simply because Germany is much more progressive with such things. Countries to watch for possible rapid linux adoption this decade are the East european ones and the Scandinavian countries.

    4. Re:At least one western country by tulare · · Score: 1

      Bah, no doubt! I can't tell you how many times I've had to babelfish a Mandrake support document (usually on beta release stuff) because my French is terrible.

      --
      political_news.c: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
    5. Re:At least one western country by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Being a French Linux does not mean everything has been translated to French.
      SuSE is a German Linux but there are still many English documents and messages in that system.

      Full translation to many local languages, like Windows has, is a lot of work. One cannot assume that the open source world will achieve that soon.
      But it never hurts to work on it.

  25. Re:Will.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    No-one's forcing you to buy and use their software.
    What about people who work at an MS-only shop? Or people who buy an OEM boxen and have Windows XP shoved in their face on first boot?
  26. Re:Will.. by vinsci · · Score: 1

    Ah, should have said sales, not revenue ;-). But then again, those are just the sales at two companies. There are large numbers of small business worldwide living off Linux.

    --

    Trusted Computing FAQ | Free Dawit Isaak!
  27. MS: Our software dies. Linux: Have it your way! by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 5, Interesting


    Microsoft has adopted an extremely powerful public relations method, but it is a self-destructive one: Microsoft has declared that its software dies, regardless of how many users it has.

    Linux, in contrast, offers software that lives forever, if an organization wants to support it. This makes a big difference to large organizations. There are many, many situations where a 350 MHz Pentium I computer running some data entry system is just fine, especially when it has been completely debugged and is giving no trouble.

    When Microsoft enforces software death, those organizations must disturb something that is working well. As you can imagine, they are extremely reluctant to do so. The issue is often not money. The issue is often management capability. There is plenty of work to do without disturbing something that is working well.

    From the IT World article:

    "The cost of licensing Microsoft products and the lack of support for some of them, such as the NT operating system, which is still used widely in many city administrations, are among the chief reasons for the nine German cities to mull a switch from the U.S. software giant to providers of open-source products, he said." [My emphasis, of course.]

    Not only do Microsoft's products regularly die, but Microsoft has a schedule of assisted suicide: Windows Desktop Product Life Cycle Support and Availability Policies for Businesses. Bill Gates has become the Dr. Jack Kevorkian of software. Mr. Gates has, for example, decreed the death of Windows 98, which is used by at least 50,000,000 people throughout the world.

    1. Re:MS: Our software dies. Linux: Have it your way! by whovian · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Microsoft has declared that its software dies, regardless of how many users it has. Linux, in contrast, offers software that lives forever,
      Yes, it's really as simple as that, I'm realizing. As far as software/OSes go, linux is eternal, once you've got the drivers or have written your own. It's probably also important to point out that linux vendors also declare death of version support (ie., RedHat). However, since linux is freely available, in direct contrast to the closed-source Windows software, users can in principle support themselves. (I'd like to know whether Gnome2 could work under RH7.x, for example.)

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    2. Re:MS: Our software dies. Linux: Have it your way! by Chatterton · · Score: 1

      The point is not about Gnome 2 running under RH7. But your current gnome or RH still be patched or patcheable 10-20 year after their release. Like the old adage, if they work, and work well, don't touch them, juste do the necessary maintenance.

    3. Re:MS: Our software dies. Linux: Have it your way! by gilesjuk · · Score: 2, Troll

      They're a commercial company, it's in their interests to kill off old products as people aren't going to buy your new ones.

      Every company has to draw the line somewhere, otherwise their support departments will have to keep on growing, eating away at profits.

    4. Re:MS: Our software dies. Linux: Have it your way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wont that change as "software as a service", you are paying anyway via subscription as a constant revenue stream so updating will only be a way to get new "features" but no change in the revenue stream.

      How will software as a service revenue stream affect killing off products, its less relevant as a business method.

    5. Re:MS: Our software dies. Linux: Have it your way! by RoLi · · Score: 1
      I'd like to add that because Windows Product Activation, people might end up with machines that won't even boot, even if they would agree to run an unsupported system.

      Microsoft has never made a statement of what will happen to WPA after the "lifecycle" and they certainly won't send those codes forever...

    6. Re:MS: Our software dies. Linux: Have it your way! by RoLi · · Score: 1

      Of course Microsoft's motives are understandable, but Microsoft's motives being understandable doesn't help the affected people in any way, they are still screwed.

    7. Re:MS: Our software dies. Linux: Have it your way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Windows XP SP7 will have a sliver of code to check a time server to see if it's dead, you will get 1 warning box and a 10 day nag in the tray. During idle time over those 10 days it encrypts all physical drives. On the 10th day it erases the mbr and restarts.

      Only way to get the data back: Windows 2005 Upgrade Edition.

      That would make the most sense to me.

    8. Re:MS: Our software dies. Linux: Have it your way! by ike42 · · Score: 1
      I'd like to know whether Gnome2 could work under RH7.x, for example.


      From Ximian support:

      Question

      On what operating systems can I install Ximian Desktop 2?

      Answer

      Ximian Desktop 2 is supported on the following distributions:

      * Red Hat 7.3, 8.0 and 9 (Intel)

      * SuSE 8.2


      Of course you can always roll your own.

    9. Re:MS: Our software dies. Linux: Have it your way! by Spoing · · Score: 1
      They're a commercial company, it's in their interests to kill off old products as people aren't going to buy your new ones.

      That's a core motivation that drives many commercial products. This differs from many though not all open source projects. The open source projects with a heavy commercial influence will also have that as a major motivation (if not the primary one).

      Every company has to draw the line somewhere, otherwise their support departments will have to keep on growing, eating away at profits.

      While this is true, and sometimes it is a benifit to me as a user, it isn't usually the case.

      Other differences between commercial and largely (if not mostly) non-commercial open source projects include;

      1. Interoperability: With a product that is designed from a single commercial provider, compatability is usually one-way; allow migration to the product but disuade migration from it.

      2. Transparency vs. Marketing (Retsin): By design, open source projects allow anyone to see anything...so no mystery. With a commercial product, the motivation is to show how special the product is...so special terms are invented to promote a sense of mystery (ex: The long-touted Retsin in Certs candy is actually vegtable oil. Without manditory labling laws, this would remain a mystery). Point: Open source is roughly equivelent to a label on a box of food; without it, you can't tell what you're eating .

      Keep in mind that I'm *not* saying commercial = evil, only that this base motivation is built-in to commercial software products. I'm sure others could either add to this list or provide an example where open source has a generally negitive motivational structure. Off hand, I can't think of any.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    10. Re:MS: Our software dies. Linux: Have it your way! by Robb · · Score: 1
      As a company you always have to be aware of the value you are offering your customers. My understanding is that in Germany they were upgrading in part because they were being forced by Microsoft (due to lack of support for Windows NT)

      It is not just the upfront price of Windows you need to look at but also the fact that Microsoft, due to the way they license products, essentially wants to take control of much of your IT strategy in terms of what versions of software you use and when you upgrade.

      My understanding is that short term it would have been cheaper to stick with Microsoft but long term the SuSE-IBM offer was more attractive.

    11. Re:MS: Our software dies. Linux: Have it your way! by Yeti7226 · · Score: 1

      Thank you for formulating so clearly why the interests of commercial software companies are fundamentally different from the interest of their (governemental) clients.

    12. Re:MS: Our software dies. Linux: Have it your way! by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Indeed and they do now have a choice, the choice is Linux.

      Just shows that Microsoft are shooting themselves in the foot, the beginning of the end?

    13. Re:MS: Our software dies. Linux: Have it your way! by leandrod · · Score: 1

      > if they work, and work well, don't touch them, juste do the necessary maintenance.

      That's the point, even with free software, who will support old versions? For example, Debian old versions aren't supported at all.

      Obviously, the advantage is that if there is a market willing to pay, there can be alternative suppliers of such support, while with proprietary software that's impossible. But AFAIK there isn't much yet of this 'aftermarket' independent support for old versions of free software.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    14. Re:MS: Our software dies. Linux: Have it your way! by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      That's partly true, and partly false.

      I can still get parts for my 8 year old Toyota and my 15 year old Fiat cars, because it is in the commercial interest of Toyota and Fiat to do so 9 (in s for parts sales). It's also that if Toyota stopped supporting cars after say 5 years, the cars would depreciate much faster, and they'd have to sell them for less.

      Microsoft could choose an alternative model than the "try and add products and don't have them working with old software". They could license their products on an ongoing year-on-year basis, and continue to improve them as part of the deal. So, your copy of Word might cost you $30 per year, hardly change at all, but under the skin be continually improved and rewritten.

      Personally, I'd prefer that. Not to have Office 97/Office 2000/Office XP, but Office which mostly stayed the same but had gentle improvements each year to do with bugs/stability/speed. It would also keep training needs down, and possibilities of software breaking with other software.

    15. Re:MS: Our software dies. Linux: Have it your way! by Dr.+Photo · · Score: 1

      They're a commercial company, it's in their interests to kill off old products as people aren't going to buy your new ones.

      Every company has to draw the line somewhere, otherwise their support departments will have to keep on growing, eating away at profits.


      So you're admitting, then, that proprietary software companies are inherently an inferior choice for the customer.

      Good for you! :-)

  28. District names by alext · · Score: 4, Informative

    Alternatively, in English:

    Rheinland-Pfalz => Rhineland Palatinate
    Niedersachsen => Lower Saxony
    Mecklenburg-Vorpommern => Mecklenburg and Western Pomerania

    Next you'll be spelling Hanover with two ns ;-)

    1. Re:District names by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      I regard it as very impolite to spell federal states like this. I also don't call New York, Neu York as they did in 189X.

    2. Re:District names by alext · · Score: 1

      Which? Impolite to translate or not to translate?

    3. Re:District names by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      It is an artificial translation.

    4. Re:District names by alext · · Score: 1

      Er, no. These names have been in use for hundreds of years and are the correct English terms as used by the authorities in the regions concerned.

      It sounds to me rather as though you (and the /. editors) are displaying your lack of historical knowledge. I would hope that educated English speakers would know that Prince Albert was Duke of Saxony, that Gutenberg's printing press was in the Rhineland etc.

      For reference, here's a Rhineland tourism page, and a note on Pomerania (wow, it's real place! ;-) )

    5. Re:District names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I guess you call Scotland "Schottland", don't you? Isn't this impolite too?

    6. Re:District names by Qbertino · · Score: 1

      I regard it as very impolite to spell federal states like this. I also don't call New York, Neu York as they did in 189X.

      Actually it's a compliment. The name is used so often that the language has got an own one for it.

      'Kalifornien' anyone? That's a real compliment.

      'South Carolina' ? We don't have a german versino for that one. Or did I miss 'Sued Karolinien' in geography back then? LOL.

      --
      We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    7. Re:District names by alext · · Score: 1

      Exactly so.

      I'll wager that Slashdot editors have never heard of the Rhineland, and never tasted a Reisling, or Queen Victoria's favourite "Hock" (Hochheim), so a news item from "Rheinland-Pfalz" is probably as foreign-sounding as one from Turkmenistan. In fact, I doubt if they could pronounce Rheinland-Pfalz without spitting on you.

    8. Re:District names by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      No, in English Hannover is spelled "Windsor".

    9. Re:District names by alext · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it Saxe-Coburg-Gotha? I believe that, due to a bug in the Hanoverian law of succession, Queen Vic failed to inherit the Duchy of Hanover, a traditionally British part of Europe, which was then obliged to become German.

      Hopefully the Queen runs SuSE Linux in honour of her roots, man.

    10. Re:District names by Get+Behind+the+Mule · · Score: 1
      I regard it as very impolite to spell federal states like this. I also don't call New York, Neu York as they did in 189X.


      If so, then you must think that Germans are an extremely impolite people. Because they call France Frankreich, they call Danmark Daenemark, they call Italia Italien, they call Espana Spanien, they call Sverige Schweden, they call Rossiya Russland, they misspell Canada as Kanada and Mexico as Mexiko, they call Australia Australien, they call Firenze Florenz, they call Milano Mailand, they call Roma Rom, they call Venezia Venedig, they call Sicilia Sizilien, they call Sardinia Sardinien, they call California Kalifornien, they call Moskva Moskau, they call Kobnhavn Kopenhagen, and on and on and on.

      Actually, the whole world's full of impolite people, isn't it?
    11. Re:District names by The+Spie · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call something as common as Salic Law a "bug", unless you regard Salic Law as being on par with Microsoft (which I'm certain some crunchies will). Queen Victoria was prevented from inheriting the Kingdom of Hanover on the death of her uncle William due to the fact that Hanover had Salic Law in place (and hence women could not inherit the royal title), so it passed to her uncle Ernst and then her cousin George, who was the last King of Hanover before its incorporation into Greater Germany.

      Because of Salic Law, when Edward VII took the throne of England, he had to use his father's status as the younger son of a duke of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha to name the house because of the disconnection of his mother's foreign title from the line. The fact that Victoria was the granddaughter and niece three times over of Kings of Hanover didn't matter.

      Hanover wasn't British, either. It was a quirk of ancestry and law (specifically the law in England providing for Protestant succession to the throne) that enabled Elector George of Hanover to become King George I of England (and if Queen Anne had died a couple months before she did, England would have had an octogenarian Queen Sophie I on the throne). It wasn't until George's great-grandson George III that the ruler of Hanover regarded himself as more English than German; George II even fought in Hanover's wars.

      England's like that. "Plantagenet" was the nickname of Geoffrey of Anjou, who never ruled England, but was the progenitor of the line through the Empress Matilda, the last of the House of Normandy. Technically, his descendants were the House of Anjou, but no one refers to the royal house between Henry II and Richard III as that.

      --
      If using Linux is about choice, how come people complain when I choose to use Windows?
    12. Re:District names by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, now I know where they meant...

  29. Who will be ccontracted for the 9 cities ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SuSE ? Redhat ? Mandrake ? Lindows ? Does anyone has an idea on which company will get the deal ?

    However I think Microsoft will win the battle : this company is associated with Siemens (a local hardware manufacturer) and can cut this price iff 90%. No company can compete with it anyway.

    1. Re:Who will be ccontracted for the 9 cities ? by Elektroschock · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Lindows is of none importance in Germany. SuSe is affiliated with IBM and very strong the local market. Linux means Linux with KDE. Unfortunaltely you cannot sell Gnome to corporate users in Europe. RedHat is less important. SuSe or Debian.

    2. Re:Who will be ccontracted for the 9 cities ? by La+Camiseta · · Score: 1

      SuSE. The company is based in Germany. (that's why I use them, their support for foreign languages is great, at least Spanish, German, and English)

    3. Re:Who will be ccontracted for the 9 cities ? by __past__ · · Score: 3, Informative

      While SuSE is certainly the most important distro in germany (and, for example, was behind the Munich deal), I think it's quite interesting that the police desktops and servers will run Red Hat. You normally can see new SuSE releases prominently advertised in every bigger bookstore here; for a lot of people SuSE is Linux, they think they are running Linux 8.2 Professional. Finding an up-to-date Red Hat box can require some searching, sometimes you'll see Mandrake, but everything else is completly geek-only.

    4. Re:Who will be ccontracted for the 9 cities ? by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      RedHat distributed its Linux via noname distributory who sold old "redhat" version. Another important thing is that RedHat didn't support German language slightly worse. Market target group of RedHat (professional users) prefers Debian, that's their problem.

    5. Re:Who will be ccontracted for the 9 cities ? by spiritraveller · · Score: 1
      for a lot of people SuSE is Linux, they think they are running Linux 8.2 Professional. Finding an up-to-date Red Hat box can require some searching, sometimes you'll see Mandrake, but everything else is completly geek-only.

      Do you mean to imply that non-geeks are using SuSE, Red Hat and Mandrake in Germany?

      I wish I could say the same for us here in America.

      Even if they did think they were using Linux 8.2 Professional... at least they would be using Linux.

    6. Re:Who will be ccontracted for the 9 cities ? by oliderid · · Score: 1

      Well in the lower countries (quite close to Germany concerning technology). SUSE "is" quite popular. I'm working for a small company where non-geek people are using Linux. From the desktop SUSE 8.1 Open Office KDE to the server SUSE 8.1 (we didn't try SUSE distro for server, too expensive for this small company) files server Print server Raid + back-up The boss was fed up by software prices and ask us to find a solution. We found one :o). This guy knew nothing about computer but he knew SUSE. (there are a lot of coverage in the business local press about Linux). They sell mechanic pieces for big industries and they are using Linux. Believe they certainly don't look like geeks ;-). The secretary is a 50 years old woman, she can print her mails and invoices :-) (based on a MySQL database with a HTML lay-out). It's funny too see her working on Linux. For her it's just another program, nothing else. I think the most popular distro used to be Red Hat (until 2001 I guess). Now, most people prefer SUSE, Red Hat is a close number two and (much less) Mandrake. Overall they quite pleased with Linux/KDE. Just one thing annoying, the poor copy&paste function (especially this annoying web active thing that pops up when they are writing mails...Didn't find a solution to disable it yet) In their office, only one PC with microsoft remains...It is a DOS 5.2 :-)). (because they keep using CUBIC DOS, a local accountant software) Olivier

  30. Re:Will.. by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1
    The USSR was a socialist entity, not a communist one. Actually, USSR stood for "Union of Socialist Soviet Republics". Lenin himself defined communism as "socialism plus electricity", whatever that means today.

    Essentially, communism is a utopic regime. Realistically, socialism is as close to communist doctrins as any country has gone.

    --
    Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
  31. Re:Will.. by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 0, Troll
    What about people who work at an MS-only shop?

    That is a "problem" with the shop - not with Microsoft's software.

    Besides, if your workplace has a policy of only using software from a single manufacture - it makes sense to have a homogeneous envirnoment, you know - it's just that: a company policy. You do your work with the tools you've been given. Or do you perhaps complain about the color of your computer or your cubicle walls too?

    Or people who buy an OEM boxen and have Windows XP shoved in their face on first boot?

    So, you would like to coerce technically less adept people into making decisions about their operating system or even coerce them into installing it?

    If you insist on having Linux on your box, it's not really that hard to shove in a RedHat 9 disc and boot...

  32. Geopolitics? by segment · · Score: 3, Insightful

    even if Microsoft tried hard to make their offerings more attractive since, including a special license contract that could save the public sector 'a lot of money' according to interior minister Otto Schily, it looks as if Munich was only the beginning."

    IMHO I think this is somewhat of a political move coming out of Germany, combined with the fact that MS has had MAJOR problems within the past few months with worms and all...

    Now when I say political I mean maybe Germany doesn't want to spend their money on US products based on the tension between the US and Germany that started with the war somehow. It would also be benificial to Germany if say they were to choose SuSE for a distro of choice, maybe that would become a Euro standard distro of sorts. Something similar to what US companies think of when Linux comes to mind... Redhat. Sure geeks think of other distros, but have you ever mentioned Slackware, or Stampede to a CEO? Chances are he's heard of Redhat but not Slack, Debian, etc.

    Let's not forget that nice little letter that went out earlier this month to the Dept. of Homeland Sec., which vendors asked the US gov to reconsider their use of MS products. Hell if US companies are turning their backs on MS, then why would foreigners want to use it.

    1. Re:Geopolitics? by Elektroschock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Now when I say political I mean maybe Germany doesn't want to spend their money on US products based on the tension between the US and Germany that started with the war somehow. " tension? I was more like accounting: the figures were wrong. Nobody has a problem with the USA (as long as they respect international law and institutions) or was anti-US. The only problem is the reaction of the USA that didn't respect our souveranity, our "national" Free Speech and tried to bully their allies. I don't think that in our globalized world any modern countrie can be independend from others. As far as I know there is no trade boycott against products of both sides, because business is rational. And come on! USA and Germany are both Western countries. We don't act against each others. (Despite some business spying performed by the US in Europe).

    2. Re:Geopolitics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they'll choose SuSE. SuSE has always been a german firm.

    3. Re:Geopolitics? by segment · · Score: 1

      That "WAS" the purpose of me mentioning it. Did you think I would type it out for nothing?

    4. Re:Geopolitics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sshh...

      The Five Minute Hate is coming on soon, where we all get upset at the UN and Europe for not bowing down to the great United States of America and agreeing to help rebuild Iraq unconditionally after we told them to fuck off for not agreeing to help us occupy Iraq in the first place.

      Don't forget - our foreign policy has been "you're either with us, or you're against us." At one point, that meant "in the war on Terrorism," but since now everything is part of the war on terrorism, any nation that doesn't immediately agree with us is obviously wrong and unholy.

      Although Germany has been mostly ignored for the hate. For some reason, we all really hate France. I don't really understand it.

    5. Re:Geopolitics? by Wouter+Van+Hemel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You'd be surprised. Debian is one of the most popular and well-known distributions, even with managers, IT companies and ISPs around. It's not necessary to start being paranoid about anti-US feelings, although those feelings are real (against the fascist government at least; and we all know these feelings are not completely biased or unfair either); these decisions are based on economic facts. MicroSoft makes crappy software: they care more about a new layout and selling, than really improving the security of their product.

      The spirit of a company should be making a as good as possible product. If the goal deteriorates to just selling and ripping off to secure profits, and an utter disrespect for its customers, it's only wise to drop any support for such a company.

      Extreme kapitalism will kill itself, when the consumers of the free market start seeing that companies only care about profits, rip off their customers in any way possible, and screw over their workers by moving away jobs to countries with lower pay.

      What you see, is quite possibly an anti-movement against "big business" of the kind of MicroSoft. Remember, Europe has always been more socialist (humanist?) than capitalist... but I predict this movement will show itself in the US too, likely aided by healthy anti-Bu$h sentiment, upsetting RIAA, DMCA and patent lawsuits, and financial fraud such as citibank/enron/worldcom/...

      People will just get fed up with that little group of ethically disabled people and companies that keep manipulating (making?) the laws and screw over the rest of us.

      There has been a slumbering anti-MicroSoft sentiment for a long time, but less technically people never had the will or knowledge to look for alternatives (people are basically apathic). But rest assured that when the alternatives come knocking on their door, you will see a nice domino effect when people realise things can be different and don't have to take it up the ass all the time.

      I'm at this very moment deleting over 30 new emails with virusses (although I'm using linux). I'm so frustrated and fed up with MicroSoft and co, I just wish it would fucin' die and go away forever. And I don't believe I'm the only one... I keep hoping for the Internet vs. MicroSoft. I'd donate my kidneys for that...

    6. Re:Geopolitics? by antiMStroll · · Score: 1
      Undoubtedly part political. German politicians are responsible to their electorate. Universal usage of a foreign-dependant information infrastrucure is, in the long view, counter to that responsibility. Microsoft's tightening up of licensing and enforcement and their history of breaking backwards compatibility in document formats means no non-US power really has a choice. Apple isn't a viable option for the same reason. Linux has only recently become a suitable option in large controlled environments such as government, which is why we're seeing conversions now.

      It is possible the recent tensions in the Middle East brought home to European powers just how potentially vulnerable they are. As Linux becomes more widely adopted and draws more support and development dollars, expect to see a stampede away from Windows-based product. It doesn't matter how good or cheap MS products become, they'll always be closed and foreign and no responsible government can leave such a critical weakness in place when suitable alternatives exist.

  33. Re:Will.. by pe1chl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't forget that many people are effectively forced into buying Windows.

    I work at a small-to-medium sized company (about 1500 people, 250 of which use computers) that uses both Windows and Linux. We like open software, but when decisions have to be made about vertical applications specific to our organization, or when we consider practical facts of life like suppliers sending documents in office formats or computer suppliers not wanting to sell systems without Windows license, we are certainly driven towards Windows all the time.
    Driven so strongly that you could call it forcing.

    We use Mozilla, we use StarOffice, we use Apache, we use OpenLDAP and a Linux IMAP server, we use an open-source calendaring system (webCalendar), but for how long?
    What if the next application insists on Outlook and Office for integration (this threat really exists, as the supplier of that application is a Microsoft shop)?

    Maybe when you are a hobbyist at home, no-one is forcing you to buy Windows. Maybe if you are a large corporation or government agency that can develop its own software or can force open-software compatability when buying things, you are not forced.
    But a big section in the middle really IS forced to buy Windows. And Microsoft, realizing that, is increasing their activity precisely on that sector.

  34. Re:Will.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can anyone say haliburton?

  35. Re:Why is anyone looking @ Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finnar, dom super och sticker oss med kniv
    zigenare snattar och for ett javla liv
    araber har analsex med vara vackra barn
    och judarna ager allt i halva stan
    En neger medfor smitta och har kuk som en banan
    han alskar blonda flickor och gor alltid dom med barn
    kineser ger oss skitmat av ratta, katt och hund
    var inbundenhet och radsla haller oss pa vakt varenda stund

  36. Re:Hopefully they will not not screw up the thing by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

    I think this is common in all places of the Aerth. However, the Green Party proposed a Bundesstiftung Open Source. This may be very intresting as far as Open Source programmers don't have to work according to the V-Model of software development.

  37. Re:Will.. by jhunsake · · Score: 1

    No, you were correct. Revenue is sales, profit is what the other poster is referring to.

  38. Re:Will.. by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Buy a Toshiba, Sony, IBM or other major Laptop without buying Windows. Even if you can, you will expend an extraordinary effort to do so.

    That my friend, is the effect of coercion - if not directly on you as the user, then certainly as a consequence of coercive pressure on the manufacturer/OEM/vendor.

    But, your handle marks you 9/10ths troll already.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  39. Re:Why is anyone looking @ Slashdot? by latroM · · Score: 1

    Not everyone lives on your timezone. In Finland it is 13:45.

  40. Re:Why is anyone looking @ Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FY for fan, for en lecker dikt!

    Du e vel en av dom som mordade Anna Lindh?

    atalad for flera fall av grov misshandel, narkotikabrott och valdsamt motstand

    --Svullo

  41. Re:Will.. by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 1
    Buy a Toshiba, Sony, IBM or other major Laptop without buying Windows.

    And you know why? Because most people would still buy Windows machines and as a result it would not be profitable to diversify the range of pre-installed operating systems.

    Sure Microsoft has made exclusive deals with the hardware manufacturers: if the OEM wants serious bulk discounts on the Windows, they must sell only Windows computers. But that's business! Blame the OEMs for signing such deals - don't blame Microsoft for doing smart business. RedHat and the others are free to propose similar schemes.

  42. Re:Will.. by kasperd · · Score: 1

    "socialism plus electricity"

    In America that is stuff you will sometimes have access to, while at other times you wish you had it.

    --

    Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
  43. Re:Why is anyone looking @ Slashdot? by jhunsake · · Score: 1

    Maybe not the world, but the internet does.

  44. Re:Why is anyone looking @ Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Du e vel en av dom som mordade Anna Lindh?

    en av dom?

  45. Bavaria rulez! by orangeguru · · Score: 2

    What our friend Elektroschock fails to mention is, that Bavaria is the most successful state in Germany, with low unemployment, low state debt and good education - especially compared to northern states.

    So please spare us the rhetorics about bavarian conservatism and catholicism.

    Bavaria feature also a high percentage of IT industry: Apple, Adobe, Microsoft, Suse, Ingram Micro etc. have all their german HQs in Bavaria.

    And Bavarians are as corrupt as anyone else.

    If you have a problem with people loving their Laptops and Lederhosen, like Scotts like their Kilts and Whiskeys, then you should reeducate yourself with cross cultural understanding.

    Bavaria is simple a state/tribe with a high cultural identity plus some some business sense. Plus most foreigners identify Oktoberfest, Lederhosen, the Alps, Jodeln, Beer (Law of purity) and Humpa music with Germany, although these are local bavarian traits.

    orangeguru - neither a big fan of Bavaria nor King Stoiber

    1. Re:Bavaria rulez! by Knuckles · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      good education for the few, right. It's easy to have high standards in education if you are so selective that you are actually educating fewer people than you need yourself. Bavaria is importing people with Abitur and academic education from other German states.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    2. Re:Bavaria rulez! by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well,

      an our friend orangeguru fails to understand that the economical situation in the southern countries is a result of the situation following world war two. And there is no relation to the fittness of any particular governement after the war. Bavaria had the luck to sit in a place where everything went to the good side by its own.

      Regading corruption .... I think in germany we have not much true corruption, but something we call "filz". People sitting in governemnt position are to lazy to care about certain problems of the community. They only move and are open for a change when they have a personal gain ... and that is close to corruption.

      Elektroschock is perfectly right when he compares the educational system. In germany all states define their own educational system. But as soon as you have "matured" and made your final exames when you leave school, your gegrees are compared germany wide.

      For some unbelieveable reasons the ministries of education define correction factors to calculate the degrees of all graduates to the same level.

      In that calculation the bavarians and the baden wurtembergers win points and the northern states in general lose points.

      Fact is: when you look at the final exams, the bavarian abiture and the baden wurtem berg abitur is a "pipifax" abitur, a very simple one. But the graduates get a reward beyond that to even increase their relative position in relation to the other countries.

      Why is that? Because the ministers of education in every state can not agree on common standards, but they also can not agree on saying: let the market descide. They need to stick their fingers not only into the question what every school is teaching, no, but also into the question how to finally level the degrees.
      When you then think about it and realize that most politicians in germany are OLD, and made their own degree 40 years ago. You realize the low amount of knowledge they need to acquire for their degree. And you realize the amount of knowledge our days pupils need to acquire. And then you know why our country goes down like shit faster and faster every year.

      The old ones have the power, and they abuse it over the future of the young ones. And as the southern states are more conservative, they believe they have even more right to influence the live of the young.

      In the northern states life is more liberal, and the young have more place to descide on their own.

      angel'o'sphere

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:Bavaria rulez! by ahillen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I remember correctly, about 35-40% of the people in my (Bavarian) hometown leave school with the Abitur. I wouldnt call this "education for the few". I think that an ideal education system should try to give everybody education on the right level (of course, this is an idealisation and not really feasable to the full extend...). Thats what you have different types of schools for.

      That Bavaria is importing people with abitur and academic education from other states might very well be possible, and given the differences in the job market in Germany it is not unsurprising.

    4. Re:Bavaria rulez! by orangeguru · · Score: 1

      The economic history of Bavaria: Well, how about this. In the early seventies the most beloved Mr. Strauss lured many high tech companies to Bavaria, as well he expanded the local defense industry like Krauss-Mafai, BMW, Dornier and others - while the rest of Germany was still into producing mostly industrial stuff like cars, fridges, steel and coal.

      So, is that really a result of WWII or local politics?

      Especially the Ruhr area - the so called industrial heart of Germany - it took decades to realize and let go of steel and coal industry, that's while we still pay the Kohlepfennig till today. Restructuring happened to late and without determination.

      Remember also that Siemens plays an important role in Bavaria for electronics, chips plants and know how.

      As a secondary element/thought: most IT publications like Chip, DOS International, etc. started in Munich/Wurzburg. Most big IT distributor also sit close to Munich.

      So I would say it wasn't sheer historical luck that transformed bavaria into a modern state, but some good political and business decisions.

      For contrast: Hamburg did something similar regarding to media and internet, so they subsidised and helped startups and media agencies a lot - with some success. Was that luck as well?

      Every other state or big city had the same chance - but did they take it? Nope.

      Now to lifestyle or so called personal freedom:

      Bavaria has the same laws as the rest of Germany. So there is no difference.

      And let's speak of personal freedom: in Munich you can do nude bathing in the close vicinity (about 500 meters) of the Bavarian Parliment as well as Staatskanzlei (where Mr. Stoiber resides). So much about conservatives and personal freedom (yes, I know Munich has a socialist Mayor, but it's still Bavaria).

      Nobody is forced to wear Lederhosen all the time, nobody is required to be conservative.

      Just because a state is ruled by a conservative party it doesn't mean young people or everybody else has less personal freedom.

      Back to education: ALL german states are responsible for the mess we have - and we had it for decades now. No government so far was brave enough to push any real reforms, instead it was just talk, talk and more talk ...

      orangeguru - I have a Lederhosen, but I can yodel properly

    5. Re:Bavaria rulez! by orangeguru · · Score: 1

      I forgot: Mr. Strauss also made big push to get most of the space industry to Bavaria as well. Only Hamburg at that time was smart enough to grab at least some part of the Airbus construction.

      Sorry for the laste addition.

    6. Re:Bavaria rulez! by jesco · · Score: 1

      Bavaria is as nice a place to live as anywhere in germany. It has its up's and down's.

      I think we should remember that when we start one of our beloved state-flames.

    7. Re:Bavaria rulez! by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      Space industry? State funded industry, that is easy! Politicians like it. It is time to request an Governmental Open source Forundation. Siemens got 1 Billion for a chip development that was produced in France. And what about the chip factory in middle Germany? Paid by state, tax exepted and now it will be moved to the east. Open Source creates real jobs. Let's request three billions for open Source development from our government. It was in the Green partys election program. I think liberal, I am against state industries. But OSS funding leads to less governmental spending.

    8. Re:Bavaria rulez! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you are off topic.

    9. Re:Bavaria rulez! by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1


      So, is that really a result of WWII or local politics?

      If you include a 'post', yes it is: it is a result of post WW II

      Before and during WW II Bavaria was mainly an agricultural state while the Ruhr aerea was heavy industries and mining. The same for Saarland. The northern states mainly where trade and fishing.
      Thats oversimplyfied, of course.

      WW II destroyed everything everywhere.

      While Saarland and Ruhr areas tried to rebuild the mining industrie and the heavy industry, Bavaria and Baden Wurtemberg established a manufactoring industrie(e.g automotive).

      After a decade or two, suddenly the heavy industries and mining industries went into big trouble and the manufactoring industries proved more flexible. OTOH, the polititians and workers and the people did not reallize that it made no sense to push more and more economic help into dying industries, so the governments in the trouble areas got more and more trouble, as they tried to intervene into the mess.

      Without world war two, the good running industries likely had extended their business into manufactoring (automotive etc.) and bavaria had probably sticked to be a rural/agricultural state.

      Basicly, Bavaria needed to invent and build a infrastructure from scratch. And that they did good. But the other states tried to rebuild the old infrastructure .... instead of improving it whilke rebuilding it.

      The current situation in Bavaria might be influenced a little bit by Mr. Strauss .... but its in no way the result of a "good" and "planned" and "successfull" political leadership. its pure result of history. You could even say: pure luck.

      The people "fixing Bavaria" are the successfull industrial and economic leaders, the guys and ladies driving their own enterprices, and not relying on governemnts to think for them. And those leaders had in Bavaria and Baden Wurtemberg a far better place to establish something than the other guys in Hamburg, Schleswig Hollstein and Nordrhein Westfalen.

      But: the Bavarian people think their political leaders are responsible for the success. And unfortunatly there have only been very few successes in german near history where "politicians" where involved in gaining that success.

      E.G. Genschers negotiations around the reunion are such a success.

      I would rather say: the germans are successfull despite of their political leaders .... and none of the late leaders had any particular remarkable program.

      angel'o'sphere

      P.S. and yes I'm german, and yes, I like munich, and yes, I like the bavarian people I know. But I HATE the bullshit opinion a lot of people have that e.g. Bavarian Abitur is better than a Hamburger Abitur ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    10. Re:Bavaria rulez! by ctl · · Score: 1

      Oooh, bizarre Bundeslaender flame war on Slashdot ;P

      Apple, Adobe, Microsoft

      American companies... and if the CSU party (who just got a scary 2/3 majority as most of the posters on this thread probably know) get their way, we can forget any local competition from upstarts and medium sized companies, just to get back to the original topic on Softwate patents.

      -Chris, who grew up in a Bavarian village

  46. Re:Why is anyone looking @ Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    det var Dick o Bush ju

  47. In other news... by ChrisK077 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... Microsoft has recently added BMW boss Helmut Panke to its board of directors [1] - a move to get more insight into the German political system?

    And a German Member of Parliament, Ekin Deligoz, recently said (on TV) that she thought it was frightening "if you think about how much money Microsoft invests into their parliament work". [2]

    Both links in German language only, unfortunately:
    [1] Heise
    [2] 3sat

    1. Re:In other news... by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 1
      it was frightening "if you think about how much money Microsoft invests into their parliament work".

      Rememeber that lobbying is not just Microsoft's prerogative. RedHat & co. are free to lobby the parliament as well. They don't have the money? Well, too bad.

  48. The word "revenue" by vinsci · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It seems the meaning of the word has changed over the years. I now looked it up in the Longman Dictionary of Business English (1989 edition) and it comes up as:
    revenue FIN. & ACCTS. (1) money received in the form of cash, cheques, etc. during a particular period. (2) in public finance, the income received by the State from taxation.
    But dict.org serves up this old definition, opposing the above:
    "Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary ( 1913)"
    Revenue Rev"e*nue, n. F. revenu, OF. revenue, fr. revenir to return, L. revenire; pref. re- re- + venire to come. See Come.
    1. That which returns, or comes back, from an investment; the annual rents, profits, interest, or issues of any species of property, real or personal; income.
    Do not anticipate your revenues and live upon air till you know what you are worth. --Gray.
    2. Hence, return; reward; as, a revenue of praise.

    3. The annual yield of taxes, excise, customs, duties, rents, etc., which a nation, state, or municipality collects and receives into the treasury for public use.

    Revenue cutter, an armed government vessel employed to enforce revenue laws, prevent smuggling, etc.

    Finally, though, a more recent dead tree Webster's gives both meanings for the word. No wonder I was confused. ;-)
    --

    Trusted Computing FAQ | Free Dawit Isaak!
    1. Re:The word "revenue" by datan · · Score: 1

      revenue FIN. & ACCTS. (1) money received in the form of cash, cheques, etc. during a particular period. (2) in public finance, the income received by the State from taxation.
      it's not even that. --> money received in a particular period can refer to differnent part of a firm's activities - operating (what the firm sells as part of its normal business), financing (eg. loans), investing (interest from cash, securities etc.) --> also, money payment can be deferred. what 'revenue' is more concerned is the amount booked for a particular period ie. the amount of sales whose obligations have substantially been fulfilled on the part of the seller; the buyer may not even pay for the sales until later (accounts receivable)

  49. Re:Will.. by dipipanone · · Score: 1

    So, you would like to coerce technically less adept people into making decisions about their operating system or even coerce them into installing it?

    Heh. Characterizing choice as coercion. I love it.

    Best troll ever!

  50. Re:Why is anyone looking @ Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You two, quit it with that foreign shit. If you've got something to say post in English. Especially if you're bashing someone like Bush.

  51. Energize the Local IT Industry by TrueJim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think one oft-unspoken reason overseas governments contemplate wholesale adoption of open source solutions is that doing so creates a lot of high-end local IT jobs (e.g., software development and support). This offers the prospect of creating more in-country "silicon valleys" and the possibility of local "dot.boom" economies.

    Open source may have the advantage of better access to legacy civil documents and lower TCO, but the real motivation of politicians is getting re-elected, and job creation is always a good way to do that.

    --
    I hope that after I die the one word people use to describe me is "resurrected."
  52. Re:Hopefully they will not not screw up the thing by foobsr · · Score: 1

    This also raises the issue of interoperability in-between (the different levels) of authorities.

    Given the (low) budgets this may end in a 'victory' for LINUX (within 10 years or so).

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  53. Re:Why is anyone looking @ Slashdot? by vonFinkelstien · · Score: 1
    As bad as the parent is, I've meet worse.

    Several years ago, I was testing CuSeeMe for my department. I usually went to a Japanese reflector (to avoid all most of the flasher losers). Every now and then some dumb Yank (I'm American too) would get all angry because they could read what was being written by many of Japanese (I installed a program to let me at least see the Japanese characters--couldn't understand it but it was mighty purdy).

    "Write in English *@!" they would type.

    Remember this was on a Japanese server. Many of the users were very poor writers of English.

  54. Re:Will.. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Yeah and among the otehr descriptions you see finaly this:

    Synonyms:
    commercialism, competition, democracy , free enterprise, free market, industrialism, laissez faire, mercantilism, private enterprise

    Unfortunatlly that s wrong :-) capitalism is a economical system, communism is a ideology and democracy is political system.

    In other words: in capitalizm you belive that "money" is "power" and that all people having "money" are allowed to use that power "unrestricted".

    In communism you believe that the main industries necessary for the community to survive: that is agriculture, heavy industries, energy industry, transportation and mining industries etc. should not belong to individual persons, or "capitalistic" persons but to the commnity, or the state.

    In democracy you believe even the dumbest moron is allowed to vote ... and so you construct a way votings are issued and votes are counted that everybody thinks he has a fair vote ... and you allways wonder who that other dumb guy won the elections.

    Erm ... that was sarcastic ... if you want to compare democracy ... compare it with republic, monarchy, oligarchy ... dictatorship or what ever. Communism and capitalism and democracy are three words from three only slightly related disjunct cathegories.

    angel'o'sphere
    inally a person who has

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  55. Re:Use Linux? by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

    Replace my Windows with Linux? They can pry it from my cold, dead fingers...

    Easy, Mr. Gates, easy...

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  56. Re:Why is anyone looking @ Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ben moi je trouve qu'ils ont raison... Meme si tu as plus de chance de me lire que eux, je les encourage dans leur protestation sur le nombrilisme americain !

  57. Canadian adoption of linux by d3am0n · · Score: 4, Informative

    Canada, having one of the most active e-governments in the world, is also being actively woo-ed by linux. At the chateau laurier in ottawa I attended the linux conference by IBM and while they did seem to ramble abit, they were being taken very seriously by the people in attendance. I guess the high amount of online government computers for vital functions probably plays a big part in most peoples minds about what sort of security and stability they want when it comes to their servers.

    1. Re:Canadian adoption of linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I wouldn't get too excited just yet. The major issues confronting senior decision-makers revolve around IT staff skill sets. Concerns abound about whether MS-trained people can effectively support Linux. The issue goes deeper than that. MS has made serious inroads into the educational curriculum in our institutions of higher learning in Canada. They are highjacking student mindshare and creating an army of drones who are incapable of thinking outside the MS box. The worry is that it's hard to get Linux certified IT people to implement the solution(s) required for government. The answer is to push for buy-in at the very highest levels. If a mandate comes down from on high, it generaly gets implemented (though don't count MS out - they will do what they can to sabotage the process).

      The process of moving government to change internally is far, far harder to do than to change a policy or law. Take courage though, resistance is not futile, it just means a long, uphill battle.

  58. Re:Right news for the right time zone... by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

    Ich kenne keine Nationen mehr, ich kenne nur noch Linux! (paraphrase of Wilhelm II, I don't know nations anymore, I only know linux)

  59. Re:Will.. by VEGx · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Buy a Toshiba, Sony, IBM or other major Laptop without buying Windows...

    My TiBook is certainly without M$ Window$!! And don't come tell me PowerBooks are not one of the "major Laptop"!?!?!!!

  60. MS: Wants everything. May get nothing. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Insightful


    The point of both the Slashdot story and my grand-parent comment is that Microsoft is killing future profits completely by being aggressive. Supposedly the aggressive behavior is an attempt to get more profit, but in reality it is a strong bid to get zero profits, and fast.

    Once the German government switches entirely to Linux, Microsoft will not make another penny from that source. The draconian, one-sided licensing changes would not in themselves be enough to push customers away from Microsoft. It is software death that is perhaps the aggression that is most disliked by customers. The Microsoft license cost is small compared to buying 20,000 new computers because Windows XP won't run on hardware that works well with Windows 98. That's the sort of problem huge organizations face.

    Of course, fundamentally, licensing and software death are not as important as the fact that Microsoft's international government customers are under the control of a foreign company controlled in part by a foreign government that runs the biggest spy organizations that have ever existed. Who was using the Microsoft security vulnerabilities before they became publicly known?

  61. Your point being? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anglo-Saxons are also Germanic.

  62. German schools by bazik · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I really hope this movement will change the opinions of most teachers here.

    In our schools here in Germany, they teach you the
    'work' with Windows as it is the industry standard and got no alternatives.

    At least at our school we got one teacher who really is pro-linux. He uses Debian, doesnt like Microsoft, is happy about the current movement and teaches the histroy of Linux, installation of Debian and configuration/installation of various services.

    And beleive me, thats thousand times more interesting than clicking through a Windows application installer...

    --


    --
    One by one the penguins steal my sanity...
    1. Re:German schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "He uses Debian"

      Debian is way behind the other distros. Worst installer out there. dselect is absolute trash. The only thing that keeps Debian alive is a group of blind zealots. The only good thing about Debian is apt and that is it. I guess Debian is ok when you aren't worried about putting food on the table. I am glad my skill set is with Suse and Red Hat.
      Tell your teacher to learn a real distro. It would be better for him as well as his student's future to learn something they can put on their resume. Debian is a very idealistic distro, however, after one is no longer under the roof if mommy and daddy, no longer practical.

  63. That's what the recent accounting and contact by PotatoHead · · Score: 2, Interesting

    management purchases are for. They already have Office + Exchange locking in lots of folks. Just as alternatives to those begin looking realistic, might as well tie them to accounting...

  64. Re:Will.. by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Informative

    Capitalism vs. Socialistism
    Even though you meant it as an insult and this line has been FUDed to death it still bears looking at.
    MS got nailed for being a monopolists. That is that one company is in control. Worse yet, it is because they throw there weight around and make other companies do what they want. And if they do not do it, then MS would put them out of business (death penalty).
    That is not capitalism.

    Linux and BSD is offered for free. But only at its' code. The real money (and costs) in any OS is not the code, but in the support. That is offered for free by enthusiasts, but also for money by companies. In fact, it is in service that companies such as Redhat and SUSE are making profits. Others are trying to but still digging out of the dotcom line of thought (Mandrake). And others tought that they could do an MS approach (sell the binary and offer no real support) to Linux (Caldera being the most infamous), but in a competitive environment, it is impossible due to the fact that Linux is offered freely.
    BTW, Linux keeps winning awards for support. Since it is offered for free via enthusiast, the capitalists companies have to work harder to make sure that they offer more for lower costs. But hey, that is what true capitalism does.

    Linux is the most pure capitalism play, where only bottled water is more pure (pune intended).

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  65. OSS critical mass eminent in germany by Qbertino · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Market is taking off anytime soon over here. I just had a 2 hour talk on the phone with one of the large players on the german internet bookmarket. One thing that everyone with knowlege of the material predicted shows clearly:
    The people are fed up with proprietary software inable to takle proprietary problems and won't take MS & co. any much longer. The market is clearly shifting to a much more service oriented one with OSS taking a lead in that area and Germany, as many thought would happend, is one of the first to adapt to that. I'm kinda glad I saw that coming 2 years ago.
    It's just like John 'Maddog' Hall said at the Keynote at Linuxtag this year: Software needs to be free, the solutions built with it need be proprietary.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:OSS critical mass eminent in germany by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      I don't like the word solution, however with a saxonian accent its wonderful :-) Yes, the critical mass will be reached soon. Kde 3.2 and then...

  66. Don't hold your breath, folks by haraldm · · Score: 1

    The project proper will not be contracted out before 2004, folks, even if the press would like to use the hype for more. What exactly will be done, and what Office suite will be used isn't decided yet. So keep cool.

    --
    open (SIG, "</dev/zero"); $sig = <SIG>; close SIG;
  67. Re:Will.. by eagle.newz · · Score: 1

    "... More like Capitalist (Microsoft) vs Socialist (Linux). ..." Sorry, but You probably know nothing about socialism. Ask to someone who live (or lived) in eastern europe (before 1989)

  68. Re:applications by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Pretty much what ever they need.
    Until apps are ported or replaced,wine will suffice.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  69. Re:Will.. by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

    You meant Monopoly capitalism (MS, software patents) against Free Market (Linux, Open Source, Open Standards)?!

  70. Re:Hopefully they will not not screw up the thing by sanders_muc · · Score: 1

    But let's not forget that part of this tradition is to always involve the Deutsche Telekom AG as contracter, which always done to make sure that it really get screwed up.

    (For the non-German readers: The Deutsche Telekom is the leading telecommunications provider in Germany, and developed from the government-run post and telecommunications authorities. Since privatization it uses its still nearly-monopoly to annoy everybody whop wants a phone landline with bad service.

    The Telekom also does IT projects and was involved in several major screw-ups: Last year, the failure of a 10-year project to put all the different states' policy IT systems on a compatible standard, and this year the miss of the deadline for the new radio transmitter based truck toll system, now costing Germany hundreds of illions of Euros in lost toll income. (Of course, in all these, the Telekom was only one contractor, but still, to me, a paatern emerges.)

    Luckily, up to my knowledge, they don't engage in Linux.)

  71. Re:Why is anyone looking @ Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forbannat vara dig, din horunga av en amerikan.

    Vi tar for fan inte ta korrex av et pucko som dig eller dina.

  72. Re:Why is anyone looking @ Slashdot? by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
    Just proves that Americans assume the world revolves around them.

    Please quit holding the idioacy of some against all Americans. We're really not as ignorant as some seem to think, at least in comparison to everyone else in the world.

    Isn't stereotyping other people the sort of thing Americans get such a bad wrap for?

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  73. Re:Why is anyone looking @ Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Shut up.

    You know, over here we don't take kindly to you freedom-hating frenchmen (or those weird french-speaking canadians)!

  74. Re:Will.. by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

    Never understood this argument.
    I can see keeping Mr. Softy for user desktops--I deem the likelihood of _any_ open source office suite offering the level of integration you get with MSOffice anytime soon to be less than great.
    But for server-side products, why pay the MS tax?
    The "you're a socialist for not playing along with my platform lock-in" sounds like a sheer whining to me.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  75. Re:My liver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    So, you're alcoholic and your liver and the spleen are about to explode?

    Congratulations.

  76. Moderators - do your job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod down this racist piece of shit!

    1. Re:Moderators - do your job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is it racist just beacuse you don't understand it?

      for the clue depraved, the parent is a love poem in that beautiful language esperanto.

    2. Re:Moderators - do your job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Here's a partial translation:

      Finnar, dom super och sticker oss med kniv

      The finns, they drink and stab us with knives

      araber har analsex med vara vackra barn

      The arabs have anal sex with our beautiful children.

      och judarna ager allt i halva stan

      And the jews own half the town.

      En neger medfor smitta och har kuk som en banan

      A nigger spreads diseases and has a cock like a banana.

      han alskar blonda flickor och gor alltid dom med barn

      He loves blonde girls and always gets the pregnant.

      kineser ger oss skitmat av ratta, katt och hund

      The chinese feed us crap food made out of rats, cats and dogs.

    3. Re:Moderators - do your job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The finns, they drink and stab us with knives

      Linus carries a knife? Who'd had thunk it...

      Every day on Slashdot I learn something new.

  77. simple economics by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Frankly, I'm very surprised it has taken so friggin long for European countries to realize what a waste it is for them to continue dumping so much money into the American giant that is Microsoft. Germany has SuSe, so why has it taken them so long to switch to a cheaper local solution?

    It's simple economics. Why send money out of the country when you don't have to? That is truly a testament to the power of Microsoft's monopoly.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:simple economics by thoth · · Score: 1

      From reading the articles, it appears the reason they have "taken so long to switch" is because they haven't had a need to until now. They've bought and paid for their NT4 boxes, and are facing an upgrade cycle in the next year or two.

    2. Re:simple economics by t0qer · · Score: 1

      Because Levi's are more stylish than Leiderhosen, Because a "Big Mac" Taste better than bratwurst, Because 3rd country slave labor produced goods are cheaper than locally produced ones.

  78. "republic" by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
    Well the US has already made the presidency heriditary.

    Or will you tell me that there will be no Bush, Clinton or Kennedy in office in the next 20 years?

    1. Re:"republic" by Quickening · · Score: 1

      ok, presidency may not quite be the "equal opportunity" position they claim it is, but more importantly, the presidency is mostly a figurehead - a PR man and puppet for the mf's who own and control everything - and THEY are most definitely a hereditary aristocracy.

      --
      tcboo
  79. Germ's goin' Linux by jskline · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is probably only the tip of the iceburg. Apparently if you haven't yet seen Micro$oft's EULA's that they now include in all their updates, you have missed the boat off this island.

    They now are installing software to "check your license validity" with all the updates, and you have to agree to this in order to install and use the updates.

    I happened to paruse the EULA's with Directx 9 and Media Player 9, and both of them contain these requirements that you click through and allow them to spy on you, and what you have in your computer. On one machine, I allowed it and had Sygate installed to catch stuff, and sure enough, some stuff was trying to get out to the internet as soon as stuff was finished loading. I didn't have time or a way of looking at the packets, and what DLL's were doing it but suffice to say my suspicions were raised when the machine starts up and takes an unusual amount of time to boot, and my HD light was on for a really long time.

    Talk about the "New World Order" or what???!!!!!!!! Bastards.

    I'm very closely scrutinizing my Laptop since it has Windows XP Pro on it, and already discovered NOT to trust the Microsoft firewall that comes with XP!!! Apparently they might be caught with the pants down if you have Sygate, or ZD's firewalls, and if people are actually willing to try them also.

    I have to try the new browsers soon as I'm going back to experimenting with Linux and BeOS (rogue versions and my legit Pro 5 ed).

    Cheers;
    Jeff

    --
    All content in this message is copyright (c) 2008. All rights reserved. RIAA is prohibited here.
    1. Re:Germ's goin' Linux by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 1
      I don't get why you've got your panties in a twist over this issue.

      If you have your licenses in order you have nothing to fear.

    2. Re:Germ's goin' Linux by RoLi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If you have your licenses in order you have nothing to fear.

      Well, you seem to forget:

      • Most users don't have their licenses in order, piracy is one of the prime reasons DOS/Windows became so widespread in the first place.
      • Many users have paid but lose their "certificate of authenticity". Yes, I know if you worship Bill Gates you have all your certificates in some vitrine, but normal people don't give a thing about all this licensing bullshit. For them the certificate is just some useless ballast. Many even download Windows off Kazaa because they have lost or scratched their (perfectly legal) recovery CD.
      • Even if you have your certificates it's not clear wether you are violating the license or not. For example some people say an OEM version is bound to the CPU, others say it's bound to the motherboard, others say it's bound to the motherboard and hard drive, others say it's bound to the motherboard and CPU.
      • Even if that all is clear and fine, some people just prefer not to being spied on.

      Why should I have to put all that effort in bringing my "licenses in order" if I can just use Linux without ever wasting a single thought on licensing?

    3. Re:Germ's goin' Linux by dnaumov · · Score: 0

      "They now are installing software to "check your license validity" with all the updates, and you have to agree to this in order to install and use the updates."

      ...SNIP...

      "Talk about the "New World Order" or what???!!!!!!!! Bastards."

      Those evil capitalistic pigs, how DARE THEY check that I actually paid for their work !!!

    4. Re:Germ's goin' Linux by jsmyth · · Score: 1

      Why should I have to put all that effort in bringing my "licenses in order" if I can just use Linux without ever wasting a single thought on licensing?

      Walking on thin ice, buddy. Linux the kernel, and GNU/Linux the distributions (just to keep the FSF zealots happy :) both make use of extensive licensing. In order to use Linux, you need to be licenced to. As it happens, you are -- the GPL is as complete a licence as any Microsoft EULA.

      The fact that you choose not to waste a single thought on licencing does not remove the fact that you must be licenced to use the software, and if you have been paying attention to the news, you would see that SCO (and others) are in danger of having their rights to use Linux removed due to licence infringements.

      Any organisation that chooses not to waste a single thought on licencing, for example, a German government body, is simply looking for a fall, whether they choose to use proprietary software or free/libre software. Either way, they should be aware of any restrictions placed upon their use of such software, or risk losing something of value to them, be it simply the use of the software (along with a loss of face in the community, as with SCO), or millions of (dollars|euro|pounds) in fines, costs, etc.

      In fact, a stated reason for many organisations to move toward the use of Linux is precisely because of the licence and the freedoms it grants, not because they don't want to waste a single thought on it.

      Be careful what you wish for - if we didn't have licences, we wouldn't have freedoms.

      --
      jer

      We may be human, but we're still animals
      - Steve Vai
    5. Re:Germ's goin' Linux by RoLi · · Score: 1
      From a user's point of view (who doesn't want to modify and then sell his software), the GPL doesn't matter to him and it can be all summed up into "do whatever you want with it" to him without confusing him. That's the great thing: One worry less.

      Yes, I leave off the "GNU/" prefix on purpose.

    6. Re:Germ's goin' Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      In order to use Linux, you need to be licenced to.

      Bullshit. The GPL is a licence to copy. You don't need a licence to run software. The GPL even states that you can refuse to accept the GPL and still run the software.

    7. Re:Germ's goin' Linux by jsmyth · · Score: 1

      Ooops. Well spotted. That's what I get for paying too much attention to proprietary licenses and not reading the GPL in a while.

      I am Jack's lack of attention to detail.

      --
      jer

      We may be human, but we're still animals
      - Steve Vai
    8. Re:Germ's goin' Linux by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      IIRC XPs internal "firewall" only blocks incoming traffic.

      To my mind, the main two uses for a software firewall on Windows are to 1) block outgoing traffic 2) act as an extra level of protection in case of windows problems

      Seems to me that it's not likely to do 2) very well as it's going to be built by developers involved with Windows, and it doesn't do 1) anyway.

      Sounds like yet another Microsoft fudge.

  80. Re:Why is anyone looking @ Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This Swede is scaring me! Oh no! But I don't care. As a Swede too, I've decided that I'm going to move from Sweden as soon as I can afford it. Why? Sweden has a terrible welfare, the worlds highest taxes, and a really weak currency. All that adds up to that Sweden is a terrible country.

    But the worst part is the snob attitude that all the inhabitants seem to have... As if our voice is more meaningfull because "we're independent" and "have the best welfare" (we used to -- 30 years ago!). You know as well as I that Sweden is a tiny country with only nine million people. There's nothing special about Sweden at all! We can't do jack shit to influence the world and politics. Please continue with your anti americanism and wall ourselves in to spare us from the rest of the world with our stupid politics and views.

    Du ska fan tacka USA for att du inte ar en inavlad slav i Nazi Tyskland din javla skit...

  81. Re:Why is anyone looking @ Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Du ska fan tacka USA for att du inte ar en inavlad slav i Nazi Tyskland din javla skit...

    And being grateful means that I'm not allowed to criticize them?

  82. Re:Will.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One day I'll find out why "socialist" appears to be a dirty word on Slashdot. One day.

  83. Re:Use Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Replace my Windows with Linux? They can pry it from my cold, dead fingers...

    And some day you can look as pathetic and forlorn as the BeOS, Amiga, and OS/2 die-hards. That's quite a dream you have there.

  84. Re:Right news for the right time zone... by tulare · · Score: 1

    Oh, bullshit.

    I was one of those Americans (From the US even, as a Mexican, Canadian, Brazillian, etc, would point out - they're Americans, too) who read the article, and you know what? I'm in complete agreement with the moves toward Linux and further am in the process of standardizing the servers I manage at work - on SuSE of all things. I'm not doing this out of some rebellious anti-allegiance or anything else so immature - I'm doing this because of all the distros I've tried, which is pretty much all of them, I like SuSE best and can teach others to use it when I leave. I mean, RedHat's allright, and I'm glad to hear that they are making money - they are a Linux company after all, but I go with what works best for the needs of the organization I work for.

    In other words, it's the rational choice and, despite your apparent flame, there are millions upon millions of people in the US who are capable of making rational decisions independent of any jingoism being preached upon them by the media, etc. I'm more than happy to say "Fuck Microsoft" no matter what country it has its headquarters in - I live about six hours drive from Redmond, in fact. So when you flame an entire country claiming that we are all a bunch of jingoistic uber-patriotic idiots, you become what you accuse us of. Shame on you!

    --
    political_news.c: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
  85. Re:Why is anyone looking @ Slashdot? by petrofsky · · Score: 1

    If it was approximately 2:30 Sunday where the original poster was when he posted at 6:10 Sunday Slashdot Time (-0700), then he's probably a bloody Samoan. This just proves those fat bastards assume the world revolves around them.

  86. Re:How to tell if you are a linux fanatic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    How to tell if you are a linux fanatic.

    No, the above 33 rants proves you are a windoze fanatic...

  87. Re:Why is anyone looking @ Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your website shouldn't be 'DrunkenIdiot.com' - should just be 'FuckenIdiot.com'.

  88. I am a complete idiot. by petrofsky · · Score: 1

    Okay, so apparently slashdot displays times using a timezone that depends on whether or not you are logged in, causing great confusion among pinheads. Samoa, I apologize.

  89. Planned obsolescence breeds resistance by Tau+Zero · · Score: 1
    It wouldn't surprise me if we are seeing a replay of what happened to the US auto industry. In the 50's and 60's, auto execs were designing cars to last only a few years. They justified this on the basis that the customer would always want the latest model (the model-year being another invention of auto executives), but they never asked the driving public if they wanted to effectively pay for 1/3 to 1/5 of a car every year so that the auto companies could build more cars. In pursuit of sales the auto companies were selling out the interests of their customers, and when Toyota and Honda came to the USA with products of much higher quality and durability, the public deserted by the millions.

    (Support costs are a red herring. Auto companies don't re-engineer cars after the warranty/recall period, and they don't even stock parts after a decade or so. There is a large network of independent mechanics and parts vendors which support old vehicles long after the maker has stopped spending a cent on them. There is no reason that Microsoft couldn't do something similar with old software.)

    We're looking at the same thing with software. The upgrade treadmill and patch-compatibility problems drive people nuts and impose huge costs, and they're looking to get off. But upgrades and maintenance are the only way that Microsoft can have a consistent and growing revenue stream; Microsoft's business model is directly opposed to the interest of their customers. Something's got to give under all this pressure, and right now the bulging inner tube poking through the rip in the tire sidewall has a smiling penguin on it.

    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
    1. Re:Planned obsolescence breeds resistance by wasabii · · Score: 1

      This is not possible. A after market supporter of a car can usually take the car apart, to see how it works, so that he can support it, fix peices on it, and understand it. Without much effort he could probably get the blue prints. Contrast that with Windows, where no after market company will ever get to see the source. When MS discontinues bug patches for NT4, there is nobody with the source code to continue them. So, for this to work MS would have to release the source code for old versions of Windows. This is impossible, as the new versions of Windows contain most of the old source. Windows 2000 is very very very much based on Windows NT, which is no longer supported.

      All in all: MS has to compete on the level customers expect, or they will keep loosing customers unless they artifically prop themselves up, specifically by sabotaging other software and creating lock in.

      For the open source community, what this shows us, is specifically that MS cannot compete. We will win. There is no doubt to it. The only way they have to compete is to sabotage standards and create lock in, as they are trying to do. Thus, we are winning. If they could compete on our level, Windows would be open source and follow standards. But it doesn't. :D

    2. Re:Planned obsolescence breeds resistance by Tau+Zero · · Score: 1
      This is not possible. ... with Windows ... no after market company will ever get to see the source. When MS discontinues bug patches for NT4, there is nobody with the source code to continue them. So, for this to work MS would have to release the source code for old versions of Windows. This is impossible, as the new versions of Windows contain most of the old source. Windows 2000 is very very very much based on Windows NT, which is no longer supported.
      So you're saying that Microsoft's "shared source" program and its system of NDAs is impossible?

      Microsoft could easily release source to a maintenance company on a flat-fee or percentage-of-revenue basis, and then collect money for doing nothing at all. To prevent the maintenance company from cutting into their new business, they could restrict them from selling new licenses or improving the products to add new features. But anything that let people stay with the old product longer would cut into revenue from upgrades, both for the basic OS and for the various suites which run on it.

      Your conclusion about competition is probably correct, though. When you are competing on cost at the margin, you can't cut your price below zero. Unless Microsoft can somehow buy legislation to outlaw free software, their money machine is not going to run for much longer.

      --
      Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  90. We such thinking we can go back to total monarchy by aepervius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And everybody not having enough money to lobby will be named "serf" while the other depending how much money thay have will be named "count", "duke", "baron" and "king". There is a reason some country are in democraty/republic. One of such was to have each citizen equal to each other independantly to possession/birth/religion. Your "too bad" for me is really a synonym of what has became far too bad in our society. And this is something innecceptable.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  91. Re:Use Linux? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

    It's is reference to the movie "Bowling for Columbine" where the leader of the National Rifles and Gun Associations (Charles Heston I think) states exactly that.

    Taking in that context I think it's a joke.

  92. Domino Effect Proven! Munich Redeemed! by puzzled · · Score: 2, Funny


    A simple economic motion and the entire domino theory is proven, only the trouble starts in Western Europe this time instead of repeating itself in Eastern Europe.

    One wise little action and the entire connotation of the word 'Munich' changed. I'm sure Chamberlain's descendants are breathing a collective sigh of relief.

    If we continue marching backward through time what else do we see happening in Munich?

    Germany was hundreds of principalities with no sense of nationalism until the fire of the French revolution followed by Napolean drove them to it. Perhaps we should all be seeing Darl McBride in a triangular hat feather and his hand tucked into his pants?

    One has to look at Micrsoft's behavior in the same sort of manner as the German barons of the East Elbe during the beginning of the 19th century. Tax farmers, they are, treating the peasants as chattel. And the end of this whole mess is started by one rebel in the Baltic. Isn't the German/English meaning just delicious - those East Elbe tax farmers were known as "Junkers".

    The parallels are there - history DOES repeat itself, although in this case instead of a GNU like recursion we're seeing a strange sort of historical palindrome metaphor.

    --
    I am very easy to get along with, but I don't have time to waste being nice to people who are being stupid. -Theo
  93. Re:Will.. by JeffTL · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Build your own computers, and that problem is gone. As for Office formats, that's a load of FUD; you can read those with open-source software.

  94. The spectre of communism.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    swept through europe a long time ago, it is now haunting America. w00t!

  95. Re:Will.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it is pretty tough but we as a company we are steadily moving small to medium size companies off of microsoft/mac and onto linux we start with 'one person' then a department then another and another till the company is off -- the selling points are better applications, more stability and cheaper

  96. Re:Will.. by dhawton · · Score: 0

    More like Tyrannical Captialism for Microsoft.

  97. Re:Hopefully they will not not screw up the thing by eyeye · · Score: 1

    Same the world over, the source of the problem usually being a combination of corporate lies ("our software will make you more productive!") and the fact that the high up people making the decisions often know very little about the subject they are making decisions for.

    --
    Bush and Blair ate my sig!
  98. Re:We such thinking we can go back to total monarc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a nutshell.

  99. Re:Will.. by pe1chl · · Score: 1

    Office formats, yes.
    Office integration, no.

    When an application interfaces with Word or Excel that does not mean it works with Staroffice or Openoffice. Could be working, but usually isn't.

    But I don't think you will understand this.

  100. Re:Will.. by defile · · Score: 1

    And you know why? Because most people would still buy Windows machines and as a result it would not be profitable to diversify the range of pre-installed operating systems.

    All I asked Dell for was a laptop with no OS installed. They refused to offer it. How does that require a significant non-profitable investment? They can allow the buyer to slash $50-$150 off the retail price (which Dell makes no money on anyway).

    Sure Microsoft has made exclusive deals with the hardware manufacturers: if the OEM wants serious bulk discounts on the Windows, they must sell only Windows computers. But that's business!

    They sure have. So exclusive that the FTC has forced Microsoft to add a refund clause to the Windows EULA (see first paragraph).

    So exclusive that Dell refuses to honor the refund clause, despite all force of law requiring them to comply.

    I'm doing my part as a participant of capitalism by taking them to court for non-compliance.

  101. personally by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    http://www.bluelinux.org/ might be the next stunner for linux on the desktop, if you think about it, mandrake and redhat.. mandake is trying to be everything, a developer os, a server os and a user OS at once, giving you bloat, unneeded services, longer boot time with services no desktop user is going to use, etc.. redhat, server os, why is it on the desktop? Lindows, no. just.. no. SusE, dunno on this one, I've never ventured into it at all. maybe it'll be a little unheard of distro that might help linux get on the desktop, it has the stuff. since it's targeted towards education (desktop users, basically) it's perfect for a desktop OS. who knows? we'll see what will come out on top.. the next decade is going to be VERY interesting. well, we'll find out in 2013. ;)

  102. Re:Will.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what you are saying, is that anyone can practice the "sharp business" tactics that MS employs. Large discounts in exchange for exclusive preload installs. This tactic almost guarentees the dominant player will become a monopoly in the preload market. Can I ask how RedHat or Sun or IBM can use these same tactics? To "break in" they have to become the dominant player first - and MS is already there locking them out. Quality of product or a growing base of "private installs" has nothing to do with it. As long as that "growing base" is less than dominant, then MS will totally "own" the preinstall market, which slows (or even totally blocks) the growth of any other OS.
    MS got there first and has carefully crafted it's "business plans" to guarentee they stay there, regardless of changing customer needs or desires. The very fact that other operating systems *do* manage to get installed and have a growing base is a measure of how fed up people are. They have a much bigger hurdle to jump (it doesn't come nicely preinstalled) when moving to an alternative to MS.

    I am amazed at people that spout the "anybody else could do it if they really wanted to" line when it comes to the MS monopoly in the preinstall market - as you do. Either your logic or understanding of the market econonomics is totally flawed, or you are a simply a troll spouting some nonsensical MS party line.

  103. Re:Will.. by Silvers · · Score: 1

    Why is this modded up as +4? Can you buy a Powerbook without OSX?

  104. Re:Will.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, dumbass, ever heard the phrase "vote with your dollars"? Not everything is disjoint.

  105. Re:Will.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because you're dirty, hippy.

  106. Re:Will.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why CrossOver Office exists. You CAN run Microsoft Office 2000 and most of XP on Linux now, so this argument as far as Microsoft is concerned is invalid.

    But I do see your point.

  107. Re:Will.. by Trelane · · Score: 1

    I recently looked at purchasing a Linux laptop. I talked with Sony, IBM, HP, Dell, and Qli Tech.

    None (except Qli, of course) would sell me a Linux laptop. Not even one without any OS.

    Indeed, one (either HP or Dell; I'm currently thinking HP) outright said, "Microsoft does not allow us to sell computers without an operating system."

    What the hell business is it of Microsoft's what the hardware vendors do w.r.t. selling the vendors' hardware ?! Sure, it may or may not make sense for the vendor to sell an OS-less PC from a demand standpoint, but why should an OS vendor be able to force a hardware vendor to do anything? Especially since a no-software PC would be potentially hundreds of dollars cheaper, making it more popular, especially to cash-strapped businesses who already have licenses they could use when they discard the old PCs, or coming from a deal with Microsoft?

    I can see it from Microsoft's point of view just fine--if they can get the vendor to do it. It makes sure they get some cash if the end user installs a "pirated" version of Windows. It also gives them an extra kickback, since the user company likely has a deal with Microsoft for the desktop OS licenses (i.e. the end user business pays twice). It also adds extra cost to the TCO of running another OS on the desktop, since they have to pay Microsoft for it, and would have to install the OS themselves.

    Bottom line: great deal for Microsoft, a not-so good deal for the hardware vendor, and the end user gets screwed (increased cost for switching to or just using another OS if they stay with a known, trusted (and potentially contracted) vendor; have to pay twice plus if they're going to use Microsoft software).

    Why do the vendors do it? Well, if they don't follow what Microsoft says, they have to pay (and thus charge the consumer) more (up to hundreds of dollars again for the retail copy!) per computer they sell. Since most users (90+%) only know and use Windows, and since that monopoly is very entrenched, the vendors must sell Windows, or be only a small-scale vendor (like Qli) and fight to squeak by while the Big Vendors (who sell Windows to the unwashed masses) subsist of narrow margins and high volume (and drive down your price and margins, since you have to compete with them as well).

    So, since you (the PC vendor) want to have the high volume (and the profits that go with that, keeping you afloat), you swallow what Microsoft pushes on you (which most end users don't care about anyway, since they only know and use Microsoft software), and get the privilege of selling discounted copies of Windows with every PC, and your users never know of alternatives to Microsoft. Sure, some new businesses occasionally pop up and might look promising (OS/2, BeOS, Linux...), but they tend to quickly go out of business, and the end users might only be vaguely aware of their existance, since you and your Big Volume Vendor competition only sell Windows to the desktop user.

    That, my friend, is indirect coercion of the consumer at its penultimate brilliance (only gets better at 100% market ownership), along with direct coercion of the vendors, and is the way monopolies keep their position.

    --

    --
    Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
  108. OpenOffice needs data analysis... by Arrepiadd · · Score: 1

    Using OpenOffice was an option that I stated a few months ago. Since I'm in part responsible for the software used on the computers available for students I've talked about that with a few of my colleagues.

    Unfortunately, since I'm in the chemistry department we need to do lots of data analysis like linear regressions, determine measurement errors and stuff. At the present day, OpenOffice doesn't have a data analysis system. OO spreadsheet can draw a regression line on the graph, but doesn't give me any other data such as the equation, or regression error. So, it isn't for us possible to use OpenOffice without increasing (too much) the work that as to be done.

    So, for now I still have to use MS Office once in a while... But, when OOo starts having the data analysis, I'll have no problem using it... For my personal documents, I already use it...

    1. Re:OpenOffice needs data analysis... by sniggly · · Score: 2, Informative
      Maybe dba.openoffice.org can help you out and if it doesn't have the tools you can probably request them. I've seen for myself how many faculties depend on MS to provide the tools and it locks the students into a corporately sponsored analytical method that ... well I don't think that needs elaboration. Above and beyond just openoffice, using linux would prepare soon to be chemists for working at companies that use unix mainframes and/or linux clusters for modelling complex chemical interactions (like in pharmaceutical research).

      Getting dba.openoffice.org to work with for example mysql is pretty simple (you either need the odbc or jdbc driver from mysql.com), from then on it's a lot like working in ms access.

      --
      Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
    2. Re:OpenOffice needs data analysis... by brendan_orr · · Score: 2, Informative

      check out Scientific Applications for Linux It is sure to have something you are looking for (plus more)

  109. Re: eminent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Eminent" means distinguished. I think you meant "imminent", which means going to happen very soon, or inevitable.

  110. Re:Will.. by JeffTL · · Score: 1

    What is there that can be done with an interfacing application that can't be done with a standalone that will work even with ALL VERSIONS of Microsoft Office?

  111. Windows vs. Linux by harmonica · · Score: 1

    Like it or not, Windows is predominant on the desktop. If you want to teach students basic computer skills, Windows is the pragmatist's choice. Besides, some things are equal for both operating systems, so adjusting to Linux isn't that hard.

  112. In Germany by carolchi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Supermarkets have to take back any unwanted packaging, and many consmuners unpack their goods when they pay for them.
    Shops have to close early on Saturday afternoons and cannot open on Sundays.
    I cannot think of appropriate words to describe the difference in driving techniques on freeways.
    America may yet be surprised by "old" Europe.

  113. Election Results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    State elections were held in Bavaria today. The social democrats fell from 28% to 18% and the conservatives achieved a 2/3 majority in the house of representatives. So much for Lochner-Fischer ...

  114. US Beer sizes by solprovider · · Score: 1

    In the US, the most common unit for beer is the "can" or "bottle", which is standardized at 12 fl. oz. Of course, you usually don't want 16 oz of our beer because it is awful if it is not cold enough to freeze your taste buds. At 12 oz, you can drink it before it warms. Most places even serve draft beer in 12 oz mugs.

    There is also the "large" size, which is 20 or 22 oz, for only $1 more. But that is for after your taste buds are destroyed.

    The one consolation is that better places serve Guinness. If they have it on draft, you are usually stuck with a 12 oz mug. Sometimes they serve a 16 oz can and an empty 12oz mug, but then you cannot pour it properly. The best places (usually Irish pubs) will have Guinness (and Murphy's!) on draft and serve a 16 oz mug and know how to pour it.

    Several friends have been to Ireland and say that everywhere serves pints and they know how to pour a Stout.

    --
    I spend my life entertaining my brain.
  115. Re:Will.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > More like Capitalist (Microsoft) vs Socialist (Linux).

    I'd say more like Criminal Thug (Microsoft) vs Honest Free Market Capitalist (Linux).

  116. How is Microsoft coercive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > How is Microsoft coercive? No-one's forcing you to buy and use their software.

    Oh, really? Have you been living under a rock?

    From the Microsoft strategy paper known as the Halloween Document:

    > OSS projects have been able to gain a foothold in many server applications because of the wide utility of highly commoditized, simple protocols. By extending these protocols and developing new protocols, we can deny OSS projects entry into the market.

    Microsoft memos from the DOJ case Findings of Fact:

    > "We will bind the shell to the Internet Explorer, so that running any other browser is a jolting experience."

    > Gates wrote, "Apple let us down on the browser by making Netscape the standard install." Gates then reported that he had already called Apple's CEO (who at the time was Gil Amelio) to ask "how we should announce the cancellation of Mac Office . . . ."

    > In Waldman's [Microsoft executive in charge of Mac Office] words:
    > "Sounds like we give them the HTML control for nothing except making IE the "standard browser for Apple?" I think they should be doing this anyway. Though the language of the agreement uses the word "encourage," I think that the spirit is that Apple should be using it everywhere and if they don't do it, then we can use Office as a club."

    Microsoft memos from evidence in the Java case:

    > "Strategic Objective [to] kill cross-platform Java by grow[ing] the polluted Java market"

    > As reported to Bill Gates in April 1997 by the manager responsible for execution of Microsoft's strategy:
    "When I met with you last, you had a lot of pretty pointed questions about Java, so I want to make sure I understand your issues/concerns...
    > 1. What is our business model for Java?
    > 2. How do we wrest control of Java away from Sun?
    > 3. How do we turn Java into just the latest, best way to write Windows applications?"

    > "At this point its [sic] not good to create MORE noise around our win32 java classes. Instead we should just quietly grow j++ share and assume that people will take advantage of our classes without ever realizing they are building win32-only java apps."

    Microsoft has tried to sabotage every major competitor on the PC, from WordPerfect to Netscape, in order to make it impossible for anyone to use PC hardware without also using Microsoft software.

    I think the word "coercive" doesn't go far enough.

    I would use words like extortionary, fraudulent, and criminal.

  117. Metric in Oz by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

    Conversion to metric went pretty smoothly here, phased in over 10 years. People still use Imperial sometimes, but its pretty rare. Trying to explain Imperial to my kids is pretty bizarre because I really really hated it. "Yeah, you know 16 ozs to the pound, 14 pounds to the stone. 28 pounds to a Quarter. 112 pounds to a hundredweight and 20 hundredweights to a ton. Nowhere as much fun as: 1000 gm to a kilo and 1000 kilos to a tonne." As for acres, rods, poles, perches ... I never got the hang of that shit -- and a 100metres X 100 metres = 1 hectare is just bliss.

    --
    Bitter and proud of it.
  118. Re:Canadian adoption of linux... (what's Linux?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Linux adoption in Canada is sadly lacking. The Federal Government may be looking at it, but industry and Provincial Governments are staying really close to Microsoft. Numerous reports and 'findings of fact' have concluded that it is bad bad bad. Usually the consultants are made up of people working for Microsoft, Gartner, or Microsoft and Gartner. The 'serious' people you mention...were they perhaps worried about job security and their lack of Linux skills rather than actual adoption?

  119. Reason for the Pint by hayden · · Score: 1
    So, for example, an imperial pint (as used in England) is 568 ml, but an *English* pint (as used in the U.S. but, of course, never in England) is 454 ml.
    That's so when English go to the US they can order a pint and not have to drink as much American beer.
    --
    Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
  120. No it is not primarily because of war. by egork · · Score: 1

    1. Bavaria is mostly CDU/CSU state, and this parties actually were about to support the US with the war. (just today they won state parlament elections with overwhelming 60% majority (next nearest about 20%)
    2. It does totaly make sense to pay less to foreign company for the product and give this money to the locals who will support the system.
    3. As to the other distros, as I understand they do not really make much effort to become certifyied for enterprise scale applications. SuSE and Mandrake did.

  121. And another thing .... by Evil+Pete · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The first city to change over and develop any specialist software for the German local government environment will have an opportunity to defray some of its costs by selling the application to other government bodies. After all their own apps don't have to be GPLed.

    --
    Bitter and proud of it.
  122. Mod this up by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

    I thought the parent post was over the top ... but this just reveals it as total crap.

    --
    Bitter and proud of it.
  123. Re:Will.. by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

    The worst mistake I see around is that many assume one thing implies another different thing without evidence. Free markets don't imply freedom of speech. Everything would be a lot better if it did, but you don't have to look far to find booming capitalist dictatorships in history. As far as I can see Democracy seems to work best under capitalism (and may even need it), but capitalism does not need democracy.

    My 2c. But I'll sell it to you for 1.5c comrade.

    --
    Bitter and proud of it.
  124. From a former colony by hayden · · Score: 1

    Australia is pretty much all metric now. About the only thing that is still measured in imperial units is peoples height. Mainly because "5 foot fuck all" and "6 footer" sounds much better than "152 centimeters fuck all" and "a 183 centimeter-er".

    --
    Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
  125. Re:Why is anyone looking @ Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The rest of the world has better spelling though.

  126. Re:Use Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a MUCH older quote than "Bowling for Columbine". Gun advocates have been using it for decades.

  127. Re: Anecdotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These anecdotes don't really speak much for linux, but more against Microsoft in Canadian education.

    In elementary school we had a lab full of PowerMacs (well, the lab got put in eventually - I had to work with an Apple II or something equally slow).

    In high school, all of the labs had Windows 95/98. However, the file server and I think proxy ran Netware. The windows computers happened to be the worst setups ever - running copied versions of other lab computers that were already screwed up. No defrag in two years, and two years of software students installed (clueless student - comet and spyware). The tech guy only knew how to work with windows and netware, and his hours were cut by the government.

    In university, all of the servers are non-microsoft afaik. The computer science server runs Tru64 unix, and the comp. sci.-only labs have thin clients. All of the general purpose labs however do run windows. But they are only used for internet, email, and word processing.

    So windows is being used (in those situations, and *probably* many others), but only for general purpose labs. They really ought to try a thin client & server method; I'm finding it works out quite well in my comp sci classes. (would it be cost justified to turn 60 computers running windows 98 and office into 60 thin clients, one powerful server, and the manhours to get it setup correctly?). I think microsoft might be on the way out in canadian education.

  128. Re:Will.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Walmart makes as much as Austria, apparantly.

  129. Re:Will.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big difference between theory and implementations. You wouldn't use Stalin as an example of what communism is supposed to be about, would you?

  130. Re:Why is anyone looking @ Slashdot? by Hackie_Chan · · Score: 1

    Not by calling them whores.

    --

    What's so bad about being lazy? What if there was a war and nobody showed up?
  131. Re:Right news for the right time zone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live about six hours drive from Redmond, in fact.

    Hmmm. You must live in Seattle and take WA 520 to Redmond. :)

  132. Re:Pff... Germans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent troll or framebait.

  133. The Imperial system is incomplete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is the imperial unit for the magnetic field or the permittivity? What about the disintegration rate (activity) in nuclear physics, or the mole in chemistry, etc, etc. These and many other units are old (say 100-150 years old) and DO NOT HAVE Imperial equivalents.

  134. EU has nothing to do with metric. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    The metric system was "adopted" by the UK in the XIX century as part of negotiations with the French to ensure the meridian 0 passed through Greenwich, not Paris.

    The British actually enacted the agreement into law (people have been taken to court for that) but was not widely enforced until recently.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  135. Tinfoil hat time: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah right. Like IBM and Oracle are German companies.

  136. That is not the point. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    MS has got no right to police my computer. If they want that right, though luck because I will not install any of their products for only that reason (which I have not done for 8 years).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  137. OK then. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Tomorrow you will have a visit of the companies that sold you your TV, fridge, sofa and bed.

    They have the right tp check you bought legally all the stuff. Good luck findg proof of purchase of all of them.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  138. Re:Right news for the right time zone... by Strudelkugel · · Score: 1

    Kaiser Wilhelm of WWI fame? One of the worst political figures in German history? Why quote such a character?

    --
    Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings! -Feynman, maybe
  139. English and Imperial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know why the 114ml "discrepancy"?
    Lemme guess. The pilgrims took a pint with them, spilt some on the way, and, made a real mess of things?

  140. Re:Pff... Germans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Mod parent a stupid pain in the ass. Somebody cant express their opinion on Slashdot without being labeled a troll or flamebait?

    Oh, thats right- people are pathologically hypersensitive around here.

  141. Start Of ? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    The linux affect started quite some time ago, and simply reflects the kind of change and adoption of new operating systems that occured from cpm to dos and dos to windows. Microsoft is not being ignorant in what they are doing, everything they are doing is planned and calculated to generate the maximum short term profit. Microsoft new it was going to lose against Linux years ago, compulsary registration substantially increased licence fees etc. were not about increasing customers but about extracting the maximum amount of profit possible from their existing customers. Their only in intent is squeeze the maximum amount of profit possible for as long as possible from Windows NT and MS Office. All their annoucement's about new products are becoming nothing more than vapourware in order to maintain some sort of marketability in the longevity of their current product range. As such any investment in MS products now is a poor medium term investment unless they declare their willingness to port their existing product range to Linux, which of course they can't do without initiating a Linux stampede. What would be interesting would be a betting pool on when MS annouces ports MS Office to Linux (before open office etc. to much damage to MS office and TCO is calculated with the cost of retraining in MS software - Linux in Government = Linux training in schools)

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  142. Re:Will.. by meme_police · · Score: 1

    Bwahahahaha, and you believe that? Puhlease.

    --

    The meme police, They live inside of my head

  143. Re:Canadian adoption of linux... (what's Linux?) by tty21 · · Score: 1

    The Governments are in big biz pockets. Heaven forbid something that's stable and works should make it onto their desktops for free. Thats what taxpayers are for!!! I tried online tax payment 3 years ago with Linux and Netscape. I had higher encryption levels than required but couldn't connect. Government help desk drone states, " Ummm, whats Linux?" Tried again last week, different drone - same comment.

    --
    The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dogs back 123456789