No, because I haven't read it myself. But Swedish to English is auto-translated pretty fine:
Maria Ã...gren in interrogation: "Thought you should do that" published 22 Jul 2017 at 21.15 Recommend Tweet Share Email Maria Ã...gren made a brilliant office of civil servants - who has now scratched. She was a record first woman in a series of Director-General positions before becoming Chief Executive Officer of the Transport Agency, the position that became her case. "I thought you should do that" and "I did as good as I could" is her argument in police hearings, a line of defense that does not convince SÃpo or the government. advertisement: Everything went on for Maria Ã...gren, the civil engineer from GÃllivare, who became the highest director of several central Swedish authorities. At the age of 40 she was appointed Director General at the National Geotechnical Institute, and after that she quickly became DG at SMHI, the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency and finally the Transport Agency. At each appointment, it was pointed out that she was the first woman in the high post. And as late as last year, LuleÃ¥ University of Technology expressed its pride in the former student by appointing her the "Alumni of the Year". But this year, everything fell for Maria Ã...gren. In January, she was transferred from her service to the Transport Agency, in June, she was sentenced to SEK 70,000 in daily fines and in July the government decided to resign as Director General at the Government Offices. This because she had cleared confidential information by outsourcing the Transport Agency's IT operations externally, despite warnings from SÃpo. "Gross negligence" The prosecutor believes that she acted with "serious care" and that IT leaks could threaten the security of the country. In a hearing of March 2, 2017, Maria Ã...gren will be able to respond to the serious allegations. The hearing starts at 10:10 pm at the Security Office's premises in Solna. READ MORE: Ygeman called for the Justice Committee In one hour and 28 minutes, the Director-General - who is in the role of "suspected" - is grilled by the detective inspector 2217 and police inspector 1101 from SÃpo. Her lawyer Percy Bratt and prosecutor Mats Ljungqvist are also present. Everything according to the preliminary investigation. Maria Ã...gren's line of defense is that the "departure from current legislation", which she approved, was acceptable and "that you had made a departure decision earlier and that it was part of a routine that you could take when needed". It is thus the departure that SÃpo warned her for, which meant that IBM's IT technicians in the Czech Republic, Romania, Serbia and other countries were allowed to handle the Data Protection Agency's Transport Agency without first reviewing security controls as required by law. "Did not get any information" Maria Ã...gren thinks she did the best she could: "Maria believes that, on the basis of her prerequisites, she has taken a lot of responsibility regarding security issues. She had no knowledge of this when she took up her duties. She received no information from either SÃpo or the government about what was within the organization. She did the best she could after the conditions she had. " READ MORE: The Transport Agency punished employees who were alerted At the hearing she is asked if she thinks she could have done something different now when she sees how it has happened. She answers that "is difficult because you can not ask for things you do not know": "At the hand of the former director-general, she assumed everything was in order. The same was true when she met her security officer. She assumed he could and did his job." At an early stage of the Transport Agency's outsourcing of data services, SÃpo believed and sent a letter of warning on November 25, 2015. SÃpo recommended "immediate security measures". But Maria Ã...gren and her coworkers
Well, our police-chief who aren't a police, prefer dialogue and socialism over catching criminals, before being the chief of the police he was the leader of the Migration office and the "Insurance" office (not the last resort welfare stuff but the welfare stuff you collect when you're sick or have a kid or to help pay for your apartment and such.).. they aren't the most trusted and popular of the government ran places and now he's totally managed to screw the police up too.
But he's still on the job. Because Social-democrats.
The previous "looks like the best prime-minister candidate" of the social-democrats Ygeman had complete garbage history too. I don't remember it now but it included not paying for where he lived(?), lots of late payments but other shit too. Don't remember if it was that his educational background was junk or his jobs or whatever, it was basically all junk anyway.
Our current prime-minister is a social-democrat and he's a compulsive liar and his background is the metal union and.. the social-democrats / their youth organisation. The one they had as leader before that was so shitty he had to go, the one before that is both shitty but also have had lots of unpaid parking tickets, bought private stuff on the account she should use for her job but a lot of other shit too. But I'm too lazy to watch a YouTube video of it all and I don't remember it all. But they are all complete garbage. And those are still supposed to be the elite of the social-democrats I guess..
By the way, did you know our prime-minister earn 2 million SEK / year?
Almost twice of what Putin earn, bit above half of your president but you're a nation of ~33 times more people and well, I guess one could say you'd got competent leaders with authority and responsibility then again with the last guy I know some of you won't agree =P
I assume it was linked to the shared data? Or something. Whatever.
Very competent.
The director-general of the organisation admitted she had done it/wrong and got a 40 days of fines whatever that's called in the US / English. 70,000 SEK = $8,500. So now it's all been covered!..
Though totally unrelated to the leak and 100% about the only party which was voting against letting foreign companies handle this information and the current threats of democracy of Sweden and so on.
.. kinda telling none of the idiots who commented my comment focused on what had actually happened: That information supposed to be controller by the authorities were leaked abroad but instead focused on the one party which was against allowing that to happen in the first place... All focus on the party, none on the actual subject.... which also explain how the Swedish parliament & media work, but it's so retarded.
Why all the Russophobia? Did Russia violate any Swedish interests lately, or are you guys still bitter over 1809?
The left haven't even cared about having a fucking defense whatsoever.
They don't want us to export weapons. They don't want us to make weapons. They don't want us to spend money on the defense. They rather send their most annoying screaming load-mouths over and hope that do the trick I guess.
It's very simple, and it's not even about democracy and rights, you didn't had that in USSR either: For the Swedish communists USSR was good because they were communists. As of right now because communism aren't ruling but rather money and oligarchs and because Russia doesn't bend over to the world collective and because the puppet of the EU and UN and doesn't help with the NWO they don't like it.
One thing about all the retarded stuff they are for and argue is that supposedly because we make weapons or are allies with the west / US we're responsible and hence should allow the Muslim invasion. That's an argument also used by the Muslim invaders themselves, but let's be honest, they aren't one of us and may be our enemies and have their own interests not in line with ours so that's understandable for them.
Anyway, the argument goes that because US/Nato/west interfere in their country we should let him in. But on the same time we should be allied with NATO! (and/or the EU) Why? Because we've got so shitty defense and they don't want nationalism. But of course if we're allied with and actively participating with say the US which lets face it is a huge part of the reason there's way in those areas to begin with (and if not for them then French and GB influences before that), so then we become the fucking cause of the flows which they can then use as an excuse for the genocide of our people and stealing our countries and freedom.
If however Sweden remained neutral, sovereign and had its own defense and didn't participated in those wars then what would that excuse would be turned into nothing but nothingness.
Now Germany is so fucked up and ruled by such sui-genocidal socialist traitor politics and filled of non-Germans that one don't want to have that piece of shit as part of your "club", and Sweden it'self is about as bad (slightly more free but a shitload of bad immigrants) that our neighboring nations may not be interested. But if one had done what I would prefer over the EU and Nato option, to instead form a Nordic federation of say Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Estonia and possibly other Baltic nations and/or Poland and such too then we'd be powerful enough by ourselves and could just ignore the EU for politics (but possibly for trade) and NATO and Russia wouldn't have to worry because it's not like we would go attack Russia and on the other hand we'd become more of a resistance than Finland and especially the Baltic states could put up alone. The Baltic states of course are protected by NATO as is whatever that's worth but Finland right now aren't. So Finland is alone.
It's all politics and not the actual risk of Russia attacking. The most likely victim of a Russian attack in Sweden would be to take Gotland but beyond that why bother? Unless the goal is all of Scandinavia.
I also assume it's an excuse and something to put up fear against rather than the Muslim and African invaders. If you can paint Russia as what's to be afraid of maybe you'd ignore the Muslims. If nothing else because the Sweden democrats see Putin as a good leader due to sovereign Russia and them not bending over to generating a world government with the same leaders of everything they can also claim that "oh but they are supporting the enemy!" while they too support the enemy (in that case the Muslims and the EU and globalism and themselves), but the thing is you're not allowed to talk about the former enemy of those and as for the others far from everyone see and understand they are the enemy so that doesn't matter.
DemocracyÂs flaw is that it allow the dictatorship of the majority. If you value the collective more than the individual that's fine. But I have a hard time accepting it. But that's a fact. And the Sweden democrats are just as much democrats as anything else. Any claim for them being anti-democrats beyond valuing the opinion by the Swedes higher than that of the non-Swedes (all national democratic parties should do exactly that) is complete bullshit simply by association.
Regardless Sweden isn't a functional democracy. You can argue whatever EU itself is a democracy or not, the truth regardless is that many decisions will be made by the elite not in line with the will of the people both in the EU and in Sweden and that private public servants, consult groups and such will make decisions for the people without ever having been elected themselves. EU and Sweden haven't got complete freedom of speech or religion rights among others so it's not possible to say what you feel or want without consequences and hence people shut up. The largest Swedish media is paid for and ran by the state. The state also distribute money to publishers and organisations but put enforce ideological values for the later and has kinda been hinting about how they also want to do that with the later too. Our current government are suggesting that media shouldn't be allowed to for instance mention the national origin of a criminal. At all. They refuse to generate new statistics over criminality and the origin of those who commit the crimes too.
The voting public in Sweden aren't entrusted the facts. They aren't allowed to get the information they need to understand the world. They aren't allowed to tell others how they feel. Chances are they won't be allowed to create interest groups for people who share their interests either (it's already in the UN race discrimination convention and Sweden as the progressive cluster-fuck it is of course always have to be the most obedient self-sacrificing nation there is.)
So don't fool yourself. Sweden and EU aren't democracies. That would actually be ok if they were libertarian societies, but they aren't. The Swedish left aren't democrats. But the left never really have. For people like this AC "democracy" doesn't really mean "free country where you talk about everything and then vote about it", in his view "democracy" mean "positive rights at the cost of negative rights because that's better for the collective." He's most likely a socialist and that's how it is.
They're right-wing/racist/ultra-nationalist
The Sweden democrats are economical middle/center. Sweden have no economical right party in the government. They aren't authoritarian, all that is association play, because Hitler killed Jews anyone who want to preserve their people or their nation are for genocide is how he argue. There's nothing more to it. Never mind actually trying to enforce the destruction of a people which is what some anti-racists think is the best cure for racism actually _IS_ in the fucking genocide convention itself. That's racist.
If by racist you mean "those people are trash" than that's of course not party of the program of the party. They describe themselves as a social-conservative party with nationalistic influences. The two later being pretty sane. Personally I'm unsure about socialism whatsoever. Socialism in the form of taxes and lots of money to the politicians and their decisions obviously grant them a lot of power (plus it's theft) so that's not really nice. The better alternative which would also beat direct democracy would be to steal the money as is already done but then giving it back straight up to the people but redistributed. At-least then you'd empower the people and we wouldn't have any authorities and rulers, We'd rule ourselves and make our own choices. I'm kinda willing to say that NO-ONE without family ties would spend the money the Swedish governme
Only one party voted against outsourcing it outside Sweden, the Sweden democrats. Another party decided to not vote at all, the Left party, possibly they were against it but refused to vote like the Sweden democrats with that result. The rest voted for it... and well.. that was good?
Sweden was never invaded by Germany but Germany was already the most influencing country and may still be the market we export to the most. Even if Germany would only had ruled "Spain to Austria" so to speak or whatever (not UK and Russia) then it would of course have had an incredible influence upon us here in Sweden and that would had been the norm.
If they had also beat UK and possibly even Russia.. Well.. go figure.. Then it would had been the major ideology of the world. I guess.
To live in a dictatorship haven't seemed as attractive before. Of course not the bad behavior against people either.
However considering how socialism and large government / people ruled from above is looking like it's coming back with nowhere to run or how globalists don't care about the peoples and their cultures but rather what to destroy that for conformity.. well. Then it looks pretty attractive. At-least with a strong Germany the outcome would had been something I've pretty familiar with and which would had been European. Now we're just destroyed as immigration is used as a weapon against us either for reformed markets or for a larger need for a strong and powerful government (more likely the later? Even though our leaders may have intended the former when they started doing it), regardless of which one less power to the normal individual and more power to either the government or the few who own the most. Neither option make me a winner. I wish freedom and ownership of your own life and property ended up being the winner so one at-least had a chance (if they want to equalize the economical possibilities then I prefer redistribution paid out to each citizen to do whatever they want to do with it because that bring less power to the governments / leaders and it still allow us to say pick the schools / school systems we want, live where and how we want, and such. It grant us choice over our own lives whereas more money to the government who then make choices for us doesn't.)
Slashdot Mirror
No, because I haven't read it myself.
But Swedish to English is auto-translated pretty fine:
Maria Ã...gren in interrogation: "Thought you should do that" :
published 22 Jul 2017 at 21.15
Recommend Tweet Share Email
Maria Ã...gren made a brilliant office of civil servants - who has now scratched.
She was a record first woman in a series of Director-General positions before becoming Chief Executive Officer of the Transport Agency, the position that became her case.
"I thought you should do that" and "I did as good as I could" is her argument in police hearings, a line of defense that does not convince SÃpo or the government.
advertisement:
Everything went on for Maria Ã...gren, the civil engineer from GÃllivare, who became the highest director of several central Swedish authorities. At the age of 40 she was appointed Director General at the National Geotechnical Institute, and after that she quickly became DG at SMHI, the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency and finally the Transport Agency.
At each appointment, it was pointed out that she was the first woman in the high post. And as late as last year, Luleå University of Technology expressed its pride in the former student by appointing her the "Alumni of the Year".
But this year, everything fell for Maria Ã...gren. In January, she was transferred from her service to the Transport Agency, in June, she was sentenced to SEK 70,000 in daily fines and in July the government decided to resign as Director General at the Government Offices. This because she had cleared confidential information by outsourcing the Transport Agency's IT operations externally, despite warnings from SÃpo.
"Gross negligence"
The prosecutor believes that she acted with "serious care" and that IT leaks could threaten the security of the country.
In a hearing of March 2, 2017, Maria Ã...gren will be able to respond to the serious allegations. The hearing starts at 10:10 pm at the Security Office's premises in Solna.
READ MORE: Ygeman called for the Justice Committee
In one hour and 28 minutes, the Director-General - who is in the role of "suspected" - is grilled by the detective inspector 2217 and police inspector 1101 from SÃpo. Her lawyer Percy Bratt and prosecutor Mats Ljungqvist are also present. Everything according to the preliminary investigation.
Maria Ã...gren's line of defense is that the "departure from current legislation", which she approved, was acceptable and "that you had made a departure decision earlier and that it was part of a routine that you could take when needed".
It is thus the departure that SÃpo warned her for, which meant that IBM's IT technicians in the Czech Republic, Romania, Serbia and other countries were allowed to handle the Data Protection Agency's Transport Agency without first reviewing security controls as required by law.
"Did not get any information"
Maria Ã...gren thinks she did the best she could:
"Maria believes that, on the basis of her prerequisites, she has taken a lot of responsibility regarding security issues. She had no knowledge of this when she took up her duties. She received no information from either SÃpo or the government about what was within the organization. She did the best she could after the conditions she had. "
READ MORE: The Transport Agency punished employees who were alerted
At the hearing she is asked if she thinks she could have done something different now when she sees how it has happened. She answers that "is difficult because you can not ask for things you do not know"
"At the hand of the former director-general, she assumed everything was in order. The same was true when she met her security officer. She assumed he could and did his job."
At an early stage of the Transport Agency's outsourcing of data services, SÃpo believed and sent a letter of warning on November 25, 2015. SÃpo recommended "immediate security measures". But Maria Ã...gren and her coworkers
Well, our police-chief who aren't a police, prefer dialogue and socialism over catching criminals, before being the chief of the police he was the leader of the Migration office and the "Insurance" office (not the last resort welfare stuff but the welfare stuff you collect when you're sick or have a kid or to help pay for your apartment and such.) .. they aren't the most trusted and popular of the government ran places and now he's totally managed to screw the police up too.
But he's still on the job. Because Social-democrats.
The previous "looks like the best prime-minister candidate" of the social-democrats Ygeman had complete garbage history too. I don't remember it now but it included not paying for where he lived(?), lots of late payments but other shit too. Don't remember if it was that his educational background was junk or his jobs or whatever, it was basically all junk anyway.
Our current prime-minister is a social-democrat and he's a compulsive liar and his background is the metal union and .. the social-democrats / their youth organisation. The one they had as leader before that was so shitty he had to go, the one before that is both shitty but also have had lots of unpaid parking tickets, bought private stuff on the account she should use for her job but a lot of other shit too. But I'm too lazy to watch a YouTube video of it all and I don't remember it all. But they are all complete garbage. And those are still supposed to be the elite of the social-democrats I guess..
Picture of the police-chief: https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_...
Picture of the prime-minister:
http://www.regeringen.se/conte...
You can kinda see how little goes on in them ..
I haven't even taken the worst pictures! :D
https://cdn.quizme.se/quiz/b1a...
https://y.cdn-expressen.se/ima...
https://z.cdn-expressen.se/ima...
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-7S4y...
https://w.cdn-expressen.se/ima...
Ygeman looks functional:
https://y.cdn-expressen.se/ima...
But clearly looks wasn't everything.
We should had learned that after Fredrik Reinfeldt (former prime-minister, Moderates):
https://upload.wikimedia.org/w...
He didn't looked all that retarded. He aren't either. But he drowned us in Muslims and Africans and sold out public property way too cheap.
By the way, did you know our prime-minister earn 2 million SEK / year?
Almost twice of what Putin earn, bit above half of your president but you're a nation of ~33 times more people and well, I guess one could say you'd got competent leaders with authority and responsibility then again with the last guy I know some of you won't agree =P
Anyway, imagine having Putin as president for half the money!!
That's what dreams are made of:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
And this:
https://www.facebook.com/firef...
I hope they can sue IBM / jail someone for this.
Well, at-least the director general got a $8,500 fine.
With great.. salary comes.. wait.. I know this one.. a larger parachute?
You both use the Norwegian and Danish ö, not the Swedish one.
Here's some of the excuses:
http://www.expressen.se/nyhete...
Google translate will do a good work of it.
why are so different types of top-level secret information of a country being stored in the same database?!
I guess it may have been multiple databases but under their control. As for why all of it under their control: Efficency/savings I guess.
I assume it was linked to the shared data? Or something. Whatever.
Very competent.
The director-general of the organisation admitted she had done it/wrong and got a 40 days of fines whatever that's called in the US / English. 70,000 SEK = $8,500. So now it's all been covered! ..
https://slashdot.org/comments....
But ran into a case of communism. Anyway, my comments about the current situation of Sweden still holds:
https://slashdot.org/comments....
https://slashdot.org/comments....
https://slashdot.org/comments....
Though totally unrelated to the leak and 100% about the only party which was voting against letting foreign companies handle this information and the current threats of democracy of Sweden and so on.
.. kinda telling none of the idiots who commented my comment focused on what had actually happened: That information supposed to be controller by the authorities were leaked abroad but instead focused on the one party which was against allowing that to happen in the first place. .. All focus on the party, none on the actual subject .. .. which also explain how the Swedish parliament & media work, but it's so retarded.
Why all the Russophobia?
Did Russia violate any Swedish interests lately, or are you guys still bitter over 1809?
The left haven't even cared about having a fucking defense whatsoever.
They don't want us to export weapons. They don't want us to make weapons. They don't want us to spend money on the defense. They rather send their most annoying screaming load-mouths over and hope that do the trick I guess.
It's very simple, and it's not even about democracy and rights, you didn't had that in USSR either: For the Swedish communists USSR was good because they were communists. As of right now because communism aren't ruling but rather money and oligarchs and because Russia doesn't bend over to the world collective and because the puppet of the EU and UN and doesn't help with the NWO they don't like it.
One thing about all the retarded stuff they are for and argue is that supposedly because we make weapons or are allies with the west / US we're responsible and hence should allow the Muslim invasion. That's an argument also used by the Muslim invaders themselves, but let's be honest, they aren't one of us and may be our enemies and have their own interests not in line with ours so that's understandable for them.
Anyway, the argument goes that because US/Nato/west interfere in their country we should let him in.
But on the same time we should be allied with NATO! (and/or the EU) Why? Because we've got so shitty defense and they don't want nationalism.
But of course if we're allied with and actively participating with say the US which lets face it is a huge part of the reason there's way in those areas to begin with (and if not for them then French and GB influences before that), so then we become the fucking cause of the flows which they can then use as an excuse for the genocide of our people and stealing our countries and freedom.
If however Sweden remained neutral, sovereign and had its own defense and didn't participated in those wars then what would that excuse would be turned into nothing but nothingness.
Now Germany is so fucked up and ruled by such sui-genocidal socialist traitor politics and filled of non-Germans that one don't want to have that piece of shit as part of your "club", and Sweden it'self is about as bad (slightly more free but a shitload of bad immigrants) that our neighboring nations may not be interested. But if one had done what I would prefer over the EU and Nato option, to instead form a Nordic federation of say Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Estonia and possibly other Baltic nations and/or Poland and such too then we'd be powerful enough by ourselves and could just ignore the EU for politics (but possibly for trade) and NATO and Russia wouldn't have to worry because it's not like we would go attack Russia and on the other hand we'd become more of a resistance than Finland and especially the Baltic states could put up alone. The Baltic states of course are protected by NATO as is whatever that's worth but Finland right now aren't. So Finland is alone.
It's all politics and not the actual risk of Russia attacking. The most likely victim of a Russian attack in Sweden would be to take Gotland but beyond that why bother? Unless the goal is all of Scandinavia.
I also assume it's an excuse and something to put up fear against rather than the Muslim and African invaders.
If you can paint Russia as what's to be afraid of maybe you'd ignore the Muslims.
If nothing else because the Sweden democrats see Putin as a good leader due to sovereign Russia and them not bending over to generating a world government with the same leaders of everything they can also claim that "oh but they are supporting the enemy!" while they too support the enemy (in that case the Muslims and the EU and globalism and themselves), but the thing is you're not allowed to talk about the former enemy of those and as for the others far from everyone see and understand they are the enemy so that doesn't matter.
So if given a c
the Sweden "Democrats" are anything but
DemocracyÂs flaw is that it allow the dictatorship of the majority. If you value the collective more than the individual that's fine. But I have a hard time accepting it. But that's a fact. And the Sweden democrats are just as much democrats as anything else. Any claim for them being anti-democrats beyond valuing the opinion by the Swedes higher than that of the non-Swedes (all national democratic parties should do exactly that) is complete bullshit simply by association.
Regardless Sweden isn't a functional democracy.
You can argue whatever EU itself is a democracy or not, the truth regardless is that many decisions will be made by the elite not in line with the will of the people both in the EU and in Sweden and that private public servants, consult groups and such will make decisions for the people without ever having been elected themselves.
EU and Sweden haven't got complete freedom of speech or religion rights among others so it's not possible to say what you feel or want without consequences and hence people shut up.
The largest Swedish media is paid for and ran by the state.
The state also distribute money to publishers and organisations but put enforce ideological values for the later and has kinda been hinting about how they also want to do that with the later too.
Our current government are suggesting that media shouldn't be allowed to for instance mention the national origin of a criminal. At all. They refuse to generate new statistics over criminality and the origin of those who commit the crimes too.
The voting public in Sweden aren't entrusted the facts. They aren't allowed to get the information they need to understand the world. They aren't allowed to tell others how they feel. Chances are they won't be allowed to create interest groups for people who share their interests either (it's already in the UN race discrimination convention and Sweden as the progressive cluster-fuck it is of course always have to be the most obedient self-sacrificing nation there is.)
So don't fool yourself. Sweden and EU aren't democracies. That would actually be ok if they were libertarian societies, but they aren't. The Swedish left aren't democrats. But the left never really have. For people like this AC "democracy" doesn't really mean "free country where you talk about everything and then vote about it", in his view "democracy" mean "positive rights at the cost of negative rights because that's better for the collective."
He's most likely a socialist and that's how it is.
They're right-wing/racist/ultra-nationalist
The Sweden democrats are economical middle/center. Sweden have no economical right party in the government. They aren't authoritarian, all that is association play, because Hitler killed Jews anyone who want to preserve their people or their nation are for genocide is how he argue. There's nothing more to it. Never mind actually trying to enforce the destruction of a people which is what some anti-racists think is the best cure for racism actually _IS_ in the fucking genocide convention itself. That's racist.
If by racist you mean "those people are trash" than that's of course not party of the program of the party. They describe themselves as a social-conservative party with nationalistic influences. The two later being pretty sane. Personally I'm unsure about socialism whatsoever. Socialism in the form of taxes and lots of money to the politicians and their decisions obviously grant them a lot of power (plus it's theft) so that's not really nice. The better alternative which would also beat direct democracy would be to steal the money as is already done but then giving it back straight up to the people but redistributed. At-least then you'd empower the people and we wouldn't have any authorities and rulers, We'd rule ourselves and make our own choices. I'm kinda willing to say that NO-ONE without family ties would spend the money the Swedish governme
"As you know yourself you know others"
Guess the software which really shouldn't be trusted is the American made one ...
https://www.privateinternetacc...
Only one party voted against outsourcing it outside Sweden, the Sweden democrats. Another party decided to not vote at all, the Left party, possibly they were against it but refused to vote like the Sweden democrats with that result. The rest voted for it. .. and well.. that was good?
I do have a bachelor degree in computing science or whatever it would be called in English.
I'm Swede :)
Sweden was never invaded by Germany but Germany was already the most influencing country and may still be the market we export to the most. Even if Germany would only had ruled "Spain to Austria" so to speak or whatever (not UK and Russia) then it would of course have had an incredible influence upon us here in Sweden and that would had been the norm.
If they had also beat UK and possibly even Russia.. Well.. go figure.. Then it would had been the major ideology of the world. I guess.
To live in a dictatorship haven't seemed as attractive before. Of course not the bad behavior against people either.
However considering how socialism and large government / people ruled from above is looking like it's coming back with nowhere to run or how globalists don't care about the peoples and their cultures but rather what to destroy that for conformity.. well. Then it looks pretty attractive. At-least with a strong Germany the outcome would had been something I've pretty familiar with and which would had been European.
Now we're just destroyed as immigration is used as a weapon against us either for reformed markets or for a larger need for a strong and powerful government (more likely the later? Even though our leaders may have intended the former when they started doing it), regardless of which one less power to the normal individual and more power to either the government or the few who own the most. Neither option make me a winner. I wish freedom and ownership of your own life and property ended up being the winner so one at-least had a chance (if they want to equalize the economical possibilities then I prefer redistribution paid out to each citizen to do whatever they want to do with it because that bring less power to the governments / leaders and it still allow us to say pick the schools / school systems we want, live where and how we want, and such. It grant us choice over our own lives whereas more money to the government who then make choices for us doesn't.)
He just don't want to admit it could be mistaken for a piece of straw.
Old i could buy. But insecure?
I wouldn't even know what you meant.
The first position is the first. Not the "nonest."
There's four letter in okay and the first one is an o.
If it weren't for Russia we'd be Germans.
And it would had been great!
Or here in Sweden or even moremember likely Germany.
Europeans aren't free either you know.
Production of bombs for buildings and infrastructure?
Yeah. AI has made art. Just wait until it design games, or war equipment, already do economics. Carrier ruined.
The promise of cake is true.
The claims that there was no cake are lies and propaganda.
It's a 2-3.5 hours game. You should know this.
OTOH, weighing a labrador who doesn't want to stand still on the bathroom scale - now, that's the REAL Nobel-worthy challenge.
Ask the Chinese!
They seem to be doing very well with solving the worlds problems these days!