At least you tried which is more than he deserved.
To be fair the AC comment wasn't from me (who posted the link about bookmarks, it was from someone else who stepped in and spoke his/her mind.) But I get your point!;D
And then some say "Oh you see. The market came up with a solution. And so fast! We didn't need to do anything!" Ignoring the fact that we in Europe, China and so on did actively supported that development and that's why we got there.
Whatever in the US or not regulations and tax advantages and support / unfair market was a thing.
Wake me up when it game as good with the same IPC as a 6 year old 2600k?
Mean-while in their ads content about the Epyc launch Intel mention how this is the first new core from AMD in six years time... yeah.. and look at all that progress Intel has done since Sandy-bridge!
... Yeah. You figured you know my pun.... it's not real human. And then it's chicken or something.... but with Donald Trump instead.... but no. It's a Siri/Alexa replacement.
What says humans wouldn't be able to understand it? Maybe their language is more effective and better? Then again if it become so complex we can't keep up then it's of course bad for us.
Gaming performance has and still is a single core endeavor
lol, absolutely not.
By now you can expect the games to take advantage being able to run four rather than two threads at-least.
Sure one of those may be the one with the highest load and hence performance be limited by how fast that thread can be executed but that DEFINITELY NOT mean that games only use one core/threads. There's definitely advantages of having more and being able to just run one thread at the time would completely destroy game performance in lots of games well beyond what having a say 30% lower IPC quad-core processor would do.
The "old" Pentium Gs (dual-core with no hyper-threading) could result in games more or less locking up relative on an i3 (dual-core with hyper-threading), but sure, processors like the FX-6300 wasn't without trouble either.
Anyway a 5 GHz "Pentium 4" wouldn't be a stellar performer today.
That unlikely would change much since it's likely Android or Samsung doing the guessing and replacements and me not looking and the screen-size being what they are and the same for doing it bilingual. Also to have a 17th birthday again would require going back in time 21 years first. But sure, do grant me that.
At least the companies competing on the global market/outside of the welfare in the EU have to compete under capitalism and here in Scandinavia the culture has been that what defines you and are the first question a native stranger ask you when getting to know you is what you work with/do, everyone is supposed to work, the politians want to force everyone to work and if you were out of job / not working you'd be seen as a loser and social outcast. That may have changed with massive immigration and long-term/life-long unemployment and the anti-racist idea that it wouldn't be OK to complain on the immigrants living that life. What culture are they and possibly there children in regarding necessity of work?
Slashdot Mirror
At least you tried which is more than he deserved.
To be fair the AC comment wasn't from me (who posted the link about bookmarks, it was from someone else who stepped in and spoke his/her mind.) ;D
But I get your point!
I have no problem with that.
Galaxy S5 800?
We try in Sweden but only get memed suckling African cock and being invaded and destroyed by Muslims. How come? Where's our authority?
Humanist super power! (For how long...?)
No economic model?
Just charge for the usage of nonrenewable nature resources, pollution and climate change. Done.
Why? We knew wind power production was unstable.
He solves it.
You always do.
And then some say "Oh you see. The market came up with a solution. And so fast! We didn't need to do anything!" Ignoring the fact that we in Europe, China and so on did actively supported that development and that's why we got there.
Whatever in the US or not regulations and tax advantages and support / unfair market was a thing.
Wake me up when it game as good with the same IPC as a 6 year old 2600k?
Mean-while in their ads content about the Epyc launch Intel mention how this is the first new core from AMD in six years time. .. yeah.. and look at all that progress Intel has done since Sandy-bridge!
(Then again they actually have. Maybe like 50+%?)
... Yeah. You figured you know my pun. ... it's not real human. And then it's chicken or something. ... but with Donald Trump instead. ... but no. It's a Siri/Alexa replacement.
https://wiki.videolan.org/VLC_... ?
I was really seeing if it had support for "plugins" though.
cn u pls cnfirm f AI tok lyk ths? fb msg app s lyk ths.
Sm ppl lr wrt lk ts!
Impr fr rtrd cmn lk SMS n twtr.
cn u pls cnfirm f AI tok lyk ths? fb msg app s lyk ths.
s alr. Mr fcnt.
What says humans wouldn't be able to understand it?
Maybe their language is more effective and better?
Then again if it become so complex we can't keep up then it's of course bad for us.
Battlefield 1 is fine using ~10 threads here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Lots of games would run like complete garbage if you forced them to run on one core without hyper-threading.
Gaming performance has and still is a single core endeavor
lol, absolutely not.
By now you can expect the games to take advantage being able to run four rather than two threads at-least.
Sure one of those may be the one with the highest load and hence performance be limited by how fast that thread can be executed but that DEFINITELY NOT mean that games only use one core/threads. There's definitely advantages of having more and being able to just run one thread at the time would completely destroy game performance in lots of games well beyond what having a say 30% lower IPC quad-core processor would do.
The "old" Pentium Gs (dual-core with no hyper-threading) could result in games more or less locking up relative on an i3 (dual-core with hyper-threading), but sure, processors like the FX-6300 wasn't without trouble either.
Anyway a 5 GHz "Pentium 4" wouldn't be a stellar performer today.
53+ MB/s not too bad for IDE HDD.
Very good if small files.
We all do.
But culling and deny progress would help.
China such simply go even further.
Clearly non-Chinese competitors are doubting their capacity to keep up.
What is crappy graphics on OS X?
The crappy GPU and VRAM configuration?
Wasn't it the feature phones business Microsoft sold?
You'll get a new phone for your 17th birthday.
That unlikely would change much since it's likely Android or Samsung doing the guessing and replacements and me not looking and the screen-size being what they are and the same for doing it bilingual.
Also to have a 17th birthday again would require going back in time 21 years first. But sure, do grant me that.
Profits. Fucking piece of shit phone typing.
Replaced with what?
Preferably tax death possibly wealth not income and proots and don't fuck with it.
At least the companies competing on the global market/outside of the welfare in the EU have to compete under capitalism and here in Scandinavia the culture has been that what defines you and are the first question a native stranger ask you when getting to know you is what you work with/do, everyone is supposed to work, the politians want to force everyone to work and if you were out of job / not working you'd be seen as a loser and social outcast. That may have changed with massive immigration and long-term/life-long unemployment and the anti-racist idea that it wouldn't be OK to complain on the immigrants living that life. What culture are they and possibly there children in regarding necessity of work?
Why?
KSA suck.
Why USA hate Iran? Which also suck.
No. Because they are moving out of there.
It make them a bigger problem. For us. The pepole. Maybe not for US supremacy.