So the anti-racist anti-sexist want to make some sort of claim that race and sex matter and that there comes an opinion with that?
If you think I hate myself
You obviously have no problem with white genocide and attacks on white people. Maybe it's simply because you don't consider yourself white and hence it doesn't apply to you. Or you don't feel threatened by it and don't give a shit about what happens to others.
want to experience some genocide and think that treating me as shit doesn't matter
Why do you support it then?
Some Christ democrat here in Sweden was in an immigrant-dense suburb and tried to make a claim that people themselves had a responsibility. Some black woman quickly tried to shut her down with talk about structural racism (somehow involving school and her trying to gain some confidence now, considering her age and mentioning school I'd assume she didn't do all too good in it and that's the real reason if she's "discriminated" - lack of capability, not her being black. But yeah, she'll keep on living in her bubble fighting her stupid fight rather than go to school I guess.)
SJWs (like yourself?) can't win an argument because you don't have any good arguments.
The reason you lack good arguments is in part because there's no truth just different opinions of which you have one and I one but mostly because arguing isn't how SJWs work.
The preferred / only modus operandi of the SJW is to one way or the other block the other person/side from arguing at all.
That's because the SJW / socialist know that if you can't even argue back then you of course can't win. But if you're allowed to argue and an argumentation happen then either side can get their message through and not everyone may agree with the SJW / socialist / Islamist / nationalist / whatever piece of trash and hence the other person is banned from speaking up at all.
You/they're all just dictators and trash and deserve to be treated like that.
Somehow I knew this would come down to the oppression of the poor white man. Care to double down and throw in some white genocide?
Your post is just another example of it. The whole point of your post is that it's ok to treat the white man as shit and that white genocide doesn't matter.
There's not really much to argue about or against it. You express it and show it yourself.
In Sweden it's viewed as totally fine to threat white men in whatever negative way, it's good and doesn't matter whatsoever and if white men think that's bad or unfair then who the fuck gives a shit? Also it's common to think that white-genocide is good anyway so who cares? If all white especially men died / went away the world would be a better place anyway so even if there was a white-genocide it would be good and is totally unproblematic.
It's the white (male) privilege. The privilege to don't matter, be blamed for everything and having everyone else gain an advantage against you on race (and sex) alone.
That's why (left/socialist/black lives matter/Muslim?) anti-racist is a code-word for anti-white and left/female feminism is just anti-male / pro-female sexism.
Yeah I know you saw that one coming. And it doesn't matter. It's still the truth and you've got nothing to do or say against it. You prove it yourself.
Your post is just another example of it. The whole point of your post is that it's ok to treat the white man as shit and that white genocide doesn't matter.
There's not really much to argue about or against it. You express it and show it yourself.
In Sweden it's viewed as totally fine to threat white men in whatever negative way, it's good and doesn't matter whatsoever and if white men think that's bad or unfair then who the fuck gives a shit? Also it's common to think that white-genocide is good anyway so who cares? If all white especially men died / went away the world would be a better place anyway so even if there was a white-genocide it would be good and is totally unproblematic.
It's the white (male) privilege. The privilege to don't matter, be blamed for everything and having everyone else gain an advantage against you on race (and sex) alone.
That's why (left/socialist/black lives matter/Muslim?) anti-racist is a code-word for anti-white and left/female feminism is just anti-male / pro-female sexism.
Yeah I know you saw that one coming. And it doesn't matter. It's still the truth and you've got nothing to do or say against it. You prove it yourself.
In Swedish law you have to willingly express threat or disrespect against at-least one of a few predefined groups of people in a message which has been spread. But it's not hate-speech if that is done only in private or if it's part of a and down-to-earth / objective discussion.
I don't remember what I wrote and I don't care very much and worst case scenario eventually I would be sentenced for my beliefs and still be very proud of that sentence because I stood my ground and told what I believed in regardless.
But to tell Muslim is a specific group, or rather that Islam is a specific ideology which make it hard to integrate Muslims into anything else of course is just the way it is. However that being correct unlikely is enough to get away from hate-speech laws. However if I explained why, though to me the Quran seem to be full of conflicts on the subject, for instance in that the Quran tell the followers to not take friends among the unbelievers and was utterly full of hate-speech against us and informed the believers on a lot of ways how we are less worthy and how god hates us and so on then it would unlikely be hate-speech any longer because I was just discussing how Islam is from what it was and how that become an issue.
I don't know the places and the exact wording but of course some will find support for how they shouldn't make friends with us and possibly not also follow us, and I think also be very harsh on and possibly punish us / fight us. On the other hand I've at-least seen one INTERPRETATION of the text together WITH AN ASSUMPTION in that Muslims should follow the contracts they set up so to say and that entering a place with non-Muslim as a refugee would be a case where you so to say promise to accept/follow the laws of that place (though there most unlikely is no such actual thing in Sweden and the refugees unlikely have promised shit against the Swedish people or nation) and as such they would be bound to follow our laws (then again they are also bound to follow the laws of Islam and there may be conflicts which then still leads to a conflict.) There's also all this talk about how there's no obligation to follow the religion, how God has blocked our mind / eyes, ears and so on from seeing the truth and also the argument that since God has done this and is so powerful he himself could had made us believers if he wanted too but he obviously haven't and as such why would any mere human try to interfere with his decision? Then again maybe that's just someone reasoning and not part of the Quran.
Anyway, reality is that Islam as it's so political and all-inclusive make it hard to mix it with western societies. There's no full democracy in Islam (the laws are already told by God), there's no complete freedom of religion (you're not allowed to leave Islam), there's no equality (Muslims are way better than non-believers, female witness are less worthy and beneficiaries get less heritage), there's not freedom of speech (insult the prophet or I guess also be the enemy of Islam and face the consequences) and there's unlikely any respect for whatever democratic reasoned law society may decide which is against the law of Islam and will of God and his prophet.
Hate and hate. I definitely don't want them here because of said reason. For instance when it comes to that contract part what happen to the children of those refugees? They surely haven't agreed on anything by just being born here just as I myself haven't either so I don't see why I should be bound to this fascist hate-speech law in the first place. I would be happy enough with them staying in their space though. Personally I think hate-speech laws are stupid. The US doesn't have them and are ethnically diverse and somewhat stable anyhow.
I care far more about freedom from religion than freedom of religion.
Ditto.
Swedish feminists are working FOR separated baths for women and men (possibly because "all men are bad" but that's of course not the case.)
Personally since I would put myself in the very free and liberal place (but not so liberal that I'll give a free pass to those who want to take it away if I can avoid it (freedom should be the only part of our constitution)) I don't really feel all that ok with ideas like banning the veil (which is also a stupid suggestion because it make the topic about a piece of cloth which of course totally doesn't have to be banned and pose no threat whatsoever whereas Islamic schools and kindergartens and Wahhabist/Salafist mosques never enter the dialogue at all even though those are the real problem) though I totally don't want to bring that people here.. Uhm.. I don't remember where I was going with this. Anyway Swedish society easily bends over and adjust for Islamism for whatever reason and Islamophobia is accepted as a real issue and phobia even though there's nothing phobic at all in being afraid of Islam and Muslims.
Anyone else we can easily live with because only the Muslims behave this way. Islamophobia isn't a problem and responsibility of the rest of the world. It's all about how Muslims behave and have Islam is. Over here freedom of speech is restricted and EU allow restrictions on freedom of religion for the same reason as on speech so if their idiotic claim of "equal value" really was something we should force upon society they should just say that that include religion too and then good by Islam.
We've got this fuckface Muslim who cried about how whatever was a breach of freedom of religion but of course that person doesn't really care about freedom but only care about Islam and he is totally fine speaking up against Lars Wilks who made the round-about dog which looked like Muhammed being allowed to speak or show artwork so he obviously doesn't accept freedom of speech.
The thing is that without freedom they themselves wouldn't be accepted themselves (by us), only freedom for everyone and acceptance of that from everyone will grant freedom for everyone but these people don't really accept that and hence do they deserve any themselves then? You're either free or you aren't. Here you may hear things like "it's not freedom of speech to...", yes it is, but freedom of speech is restricted here so there's a case of non-freedom of speech which is about what they mention. But that's not a freedom.
And you are convinced that there is no way to detect the bad ones, and no way for the good ones to fully assimilate? Literally the only solution is to keep inferior people out?
Is? Of course it's possible.
But in this land of "everyone are of equal value except the white man and those who don't want to let anyone in for whatever reason and forever" none of that is being done.
The IS warriors are welcome back and will get help to get a job or whatever.
What I meant was that if Facebook doesn't deal with Germany then shouldn't they be able to simply say fuck off to them?
So you aren't speaking for the majority in Sweden after all.
I am speaking for the majority of the Swedes when it come to how many refugees should be brought it.
Immigration is still at the very top together with was it hospital and possibly school? among the Swedish people having dropped from being the single most important thing for the Swedish people. But before it haven't been the most important thing and for many it of course aren't and some even want more refugees. Anyway as such when people vote they vote on a party DUE OF A MULTITUDE OF REASONS not ONLY BECAUSE OF WHAT THEY IMMIGRATION POLITICS IS! Hence people haven't voted for the only party which has been against this retardness (a situation which likely happened because that party thought so and then everyone was like "oh no the Nazis are coming!" so they dug themselves deep onto the mud in a "Sweden for everyone or Nazi!"-message.)
Who exactly gives you the mandate to speak for the majority of the Europeans then?
I have no mandate to do so I just do so.
What idiots like you with your consistent lies don't mention is that there are polls which are made regarding immigration which for instance ask whatever Sweden should take in more or less immigrants and in such a poll less will come out higher than more consistently and as such obviously the Swedes want less immigrants. That they vote on traitor parties which don't care about that part and flood us with immigrants is a different story. Sure it's totally mental to vote on those idiots and traitors but they do so. Personally I myself have voted on the environmentalist party which are the most extreme when it comes to mass-immigration and I've done so for three elections in a row but I of course didn't do so because I loved immigrants so much I did so because I thought trying to solve the impact of global warming for instance once it had already happened would be more expensive than adjusting in an attempt to never let it go that far. I care about the environment and non-humans of the planet but that doesn't mean I want hundred of thousands of Muslims to come to my land every year. It's two different questions even if the same party may want to have both of them. It's one of the most progressive parties of Sweden but they are more or less complete nutcases with no care whatsoever to what happened to the people or the economy so.. They aren't what one should vote for unless one is an ideological nutcase.
The last time I was in Sweden was in 1992 and people like you are the reason why it will stay that way.
Stay how? I guess you don't mean in Sweden but rather why you won't visit?
Back in 1992 we had the then highest flow of immigrants back then from former Yugoslavia, the anti-immigration movement was stronger back then but then the establishment more or less killed it but in their last attempt to keep on killing it by giving no influence to the Sweden democrats and by flooding Sweden with MORE immigrants in an attempt to show that voting for the Sweden democrats was futile backfired and now it's one of the three largest parties in Sweden so.. they kinda fucked that one up by making us desperate. They will likely try even more but then maybe people will act even more desperate.. Good times.. Idiots.
Same goes for Poland by the way.
Poland and Sweden isn't comparable. In Poland being against immigrant is totally common, they are a sane nation not flooded with that shit. The number of Swedes who talk like I do is a very small part of the Swedish population. Sure people think they have brought in too many immigrants but the people are friendly and don't want to upset others so
There's this one from 2013 which gives a number more in line with what you claim with 22 249 SEK / month but that one is three years old whereas the one with 28 000 SEK / month is from this year: https://ladycobra.wordpress.co...
I have no idea if people actually lose the money on a scale worth mentioning.
On the other hand there's those who "separate" to have double benefits and double housing and then rent out one of them and live together anyway, or the cheating with assistants or fake consultation for getting a job or a fake job (or a fake job to get to stay as a "working immigrant") and so on.
The more welfare solutions and providers with poor regulation the more chances to cheat the system.
28 000 with three children is still $3000 and that's after taxes for no work whatsoever. The reason for such absurdity is the idea that all children should be brought up in a similar environment and that's nice and all BUT YOU CAN'T OFFER THAT FOR THE WHOLE FUCKING WORLD IN A NATIONAL SYSTEM AND STILL MAINTAIN A GOOD LIVING STANDARD YOURSELF!
All "refugees" aren't refugees. All "refugees" doesn't come from metropolitan areas. All "refugees" doesn't come from Syria and Iraq. Whatever amount of Muslims doesn't want to assimilate. Even if they want to get a job plenty don't have the educational standard of a Swede and even if they did they would be culturally disabled.
I assume the system is designed for those who are actually supposed to be here. It should had been branded as such. However the idiots has brought stuff like "equal value and rights" into our.. form document of the government (part of our "constitution.") Asylum activists and people who "are good" are interpreting and doing there thing. Civil servants in Sweden no longer have any responsibility for what they do so.. Go ahead.
There is a "foreigner law" in Sweden which state that the municipality and such should help the police to deport foreigners who are here illegally but there's restrictions on that they have to be "orderly received" in the other nation or something and plenty of nations where they come form don't accept their own people back if they are deported (Somalia, Iran, Afghanistan, likely a whole bunch more) so they "can't" be deported.
But yeah, even if the text would be formulated so it would include everyone which is a completely retarded idea then the foreigner law should help make sure any illegal immigrant (in Sweden called "Paper less" like if they just happened to lack their passport) was returned. But the system doesn't work and I wouldn't be surprised if the laws haven't been designed as non-functional as they are with that purpose in mind.
Plenty of studies showed that removing the worry of securing a living is a sure path to a peaceful and thriving society.
But a society with 4.5 million workers can't offer that for the whole world. Do it globally or do it nationally with closed borders but don't do it nationally offering it for everyone.
I'm not morally to help. Even less these fucktards who rape and murder. What about them? They have no obligations? They sure as hell aren't executed or forced out themselves. Though they should be. Also lots of people come from Somalia, Eritrea and Iran (Afghanistan.)
Of course liberal societies over there would be the best but they suffer a hard case of Islam and the US and various Arab states fight for influence in the region. Sweden not so much.. Feel free to argue that the US should take them in rather than us though.
But all "refugees" aren't refugees either. And even if they are refugees why should they have right to any welfare system / slave labor at all?
Russia want Assad to win and the US want Assad out likely because he's allied with Russia. Germany are most often trying to be friend with both Russia and the US so I don't know if you can state all that much that they are involved in it and Sweden of course shouldn't take part in that at all but the Swedish government is scaremongering against Russia likely because they are traitors themselves and want us to find a different (and common?) enemy. The idiots will vote against Russia and the place we give the most money is terrorist Palestine like if they deserved it the most. Our Social democrats view their party as their sister party... Fuck socialists everywhere.
Syrians have taken the bicycle over from Russia to Norway so I'm pretty sure they have indeed come to Russia and I assume Russia may take them in but economy and living standard matters and the reality is that not even places like Italy and France are good enough for these leeches. It's northern Europe or UK which they want too. A high percentage of those who ask for asylum in Bulgaria gets it but these leeches don't want to live in Bulgaria because that's a poor country by European standards.
Why the fuck would I go to Aleppo you retard? Society have no right to tax or enforce any law on me for all I care. I haven't agreed to anything such. If I wanted to sign a deal for whatever then I could do so myself.
"EU member states must refrain from encouraging fear and hatred against migrants and asylum seekers for their own political gain.
It says the European Parliament in a new report on fundamental rights. It's Tuesday has been voted through parliament with an overwhelming majority.
- We have seen an increase in hate speech from political parties throughout Europe, says JÃzsef Nagy, a member of the EPP Group in the European Parliament and rapporteur for the report.
EU spokesman for the Danish People's Party Kenneth Kristensen Berth said recently that the EU's border guards can use warning shots against boat people. The shots were to get migrants to return.
It may be an example of a hateful expression in the EU Parliament will curb, says JÃzsef Nagy.
- We experience these outbreaks and it is not only in Denmark but throughout Europe.
- I do not think that he is serious about shooting refugees, but we must be vigilant. We can not allow the political dialogue become violent threats, says Nagy.
Instead of the negatively charged dialogue should member states according to the report promoting the European values ââof freedom and equality.
Tolerance and a sense of community will counter stigma. At the same time it will prevent radicalization and violent extremism, says the European Parliament in the report.
In addition, it will help EU citizens to have a more positive view of integration.
- Our union must not only deal say with legal and financial problems. The EU must also deal with the question of fundamental rights and set a good example, says JÃzsef Nagy."
The majority likely don't want to be invaded by them, I know that here in Sweden the majority consistently wish for less. And that's in a lied upon system which I think may also have the most positive people in the EU towards it? But feel free to give actual evidence for what you claim rather than just stating it.
They don't need to die. Here in Sweden lots of private services are bought with public funding. We could simply buy refugee shelter of whatever quality we thought was decent from the lowest bidder among other nations. Preferably nations which are closed to the area where there is trouble. Alternatively we could just not offer them any citizenship or welfare and then they came anyway or they didn't and went somewhere else instead.
Then the German police will raid Facebook's German offices.
Just close them down and ignore the Germans?
Speak for yourself.
As for volumes I'm speaking for the majority even in Sweden and I of course also speak for the majority of the Europeans.
I'm only here because enough people did not have your shitty attitude to my great grandparents who were also refugees from persecution.
My opinion doesn't even matter since the ruling elite is possibly even beyond the EU but if nothing else there and that's law which become superior to Swedish law and even if that wasn't the case Sweden is a consensus democrature where established media and the political elite holds hands and go their own way and don't listen to the people but rather tell the people what they should believe and accept.
I can raise it (and be hushed in all mainstream and social media and possibly jailed or killed for it) but unless half+ of the Swedish population voted for the same alternative it will have little result. And even then as said we're ruled by the EU and they can still decide against the will of the Swedish politicians and people. We could of course leave the EU and should. Eventually if we talked things like deportation the UN would likely be upset too.
Also the attitude isn't shitty just because you say so. It's a sane attitude. If nothing else the welfare system should be completely abolished so we don't attract people who don't want freedom and Swedish culture but come from the money such as the guy who punched out the teeth of the teacher who talked to his wife. He's obviously not here because of his great knowledge about the Swedes and their society beyond how much money he could leech from the system.
I wrote a reply just after how I meant an American COMPANY and how I hadn't eaten yet but I couldn't post it then because of the time delay and then it never got posted.
What I meant was that Facebook is an American company and I don't necessarily see why whatever national law should apply to any country in the world. Then again that may very well be how it is in this case.
I of course never meant Germany was part of America.
Here in Sweden we haven't got enough taxation to cover spending of the government or the municipalities right now and even then it's about 44% of GDP. An immigrant family with two children can receive $3000 / month AFTER TAXES with no work whatsoever.
How many such families do you think it's ok to bring into Sweden?
Germany grant more welfare than the US and Sweden grant more than Germany. That's why they come here. Too leech. Within the last day or two I heard about a teacher who had got his teeth punched out because the teacher was talking to a woman who was his wife. That's what you get with Muslims. Everyone else is no problem culturally but Muslims are and will be because their vile hate-ideology doesn't want them to adjust or accept our ways.
Mexicans into the US would if not completely at-least to a higher degree be work immigration whereas our immigration are refugee/sponge immigration and Muslim colonization. The Mexicans unlikely will destroy the culture of the US I guess (vote democrats?), the Muslims will definitely destroy our culture.
You can't compare the two.
Also the number of refugees who came to Sweden was like 35 times as many / capita as to the US so yeah.. there's a volume difference. But the US system have a stronger freedom and democracy and robustness / conservatism in the system and have lower welfare and likely don't even open up for the trash we get here. Your system is better suited for it and you still don't bring in even close to as many. (Also US and allies like Saudi-Arabia and Turkey is what support the rebels and religious extremism in Syria and Iraq and it's the US who got rid of Gadaffi and Hussein and want to get rid of Assad too. You're part of the reason the genuine refugees even exist.)
Now the EU are banning (?) negative speak about refugees from the parties. But how is that even the problem? The problem is that our traitor government let these people in in the first place. We don't want them here. That's the scenario. Why are they brought in? EU, Germany and Sweden are the enemies of the European peoples and democracy.
what kind of pipe they use for this kinda thing, im thinking some kind of ceramic metal hybrid?? Temps and sulfer corrosion must be a major PITA to deal with.
Thorium? / Swede.
See what I did there? But I have no fucking clue. Amazing Scandinavians. Utterly destroyed by treason from our ass-holes of politicians and the social-liberal left. WTF where you thinking? I understand the concept: "It may bring problems if we talk badly about some people" - it's ok as long as you don't bring them here. But you know.. bringing Muslims into a nation and the poor into a welfare system isn't without consequences either.
I thought the $500 just came from a redditer who had made up his own spread-sheet with prices and scores (which was guesstimated?), but maybe there was more to it because wccftech didn't abandoned it afterwards. Or maybe there wasn't.
One one hand even at $500 AMD would get lots more money / CPU than with current FX processors. On the other hand why charge that when Intel charges like $1100? On the third hand I guess they want to become popular again and hence out-price Intel.
But this was relative 1800:1 so it seem pretty fair.
Though isn't most IPS more like 800:1-1000:1 so maybe it's dynamic after all.
If all it did was shutter off the back-light to create something completely black then I don't care much.
But since someone else suggested it was like two LCDs on top of each other I assume normal LCDs can actually restrict the light-flow to varying degree considering they can show different brightness after-all and as such I guess it would actually scale the brightness through the whole range and if so it's interesting.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm a white male.
So the anti-racist anti-sexist want to make some sort of claim that race and sex matter and that there comes an opinion with that?
If you think I hate myself
You obviously have no problem with white genocide and attacks on white people. Maybe it's simply because you don't consider yourself white and hence it doesn't apply to you. Or you don't feel threatened by it and don't give a shit about what happens to others.
want to experience some genocide and think that treating me as shit doesn't matter
Why do you support it then?
Some Christ democrat here in Sweden was in an immigrant-dense suburb and tried to make a claim that people themselves had a responsibility. Some black woman quickly tried to shut her down with talk about structural racism (somehow involving school and her trying to gain some confidence now, considering her age and mentioning school I'd assume she didn't do all too good in it and that's the real reason if she's "discriminated" - lack of capability, not her being black. But yeah, she'll keep on living in her bubble fighting her stupid fight rather than go to school I guess.)
Retarded how you mentioned "safe space."
Also plenty of us are willing to take it to the real world too.
I hope you don't whine once that happens.
SJWs (like yourself?) can't win an argument because you don't have any good arguments.
The reason you lack good arguments is in part because there's no truth just different opinions of which you have one and I one but mostly because arguing isn't how SJWs work.
The preferred / only modus operandi of the SJW is to one way or the other block the other person/side from arguing at all.
That's because the SJW / socialist know that if you can't even argue back then you of course can't win. But if you're allowed to argue and an argumentation happen then either side can get their message through and not everyone may agree with the SJW / socialist / Islamist / nationalist / whatever piece of trash and hence the other person is banned from speaking up at all.
You/they're all just dictators and trash and deserve to be treated like that.
so let's do it again just to rub it in:
Somehow I knew this would come down to the oppression of the poor white man. Care to double down and throw in some white genocide?
Your post is just another example of it.
The whole point of your post is that it's ok to treat the white man as shit and that white genocide doesn't matter.
There's not really much to argue about or against it. You express it and show it yourself.
In Sweden it's viewed as totally fine to threat white men in whatever negative way, it's good and doesn't matter whatsoever and if white men think that's bad or unfair then who the fuck gives a shit?
Also it's common to think that white-genocide is good anyway so who cares? If all white especially men died / went away the world would be a better place anyway so even if there was a white-genocide it would be good and is totally unproblematic.
It's the white (male) privilege. The privilege to don't matter, be blamed for everything and having everyone else gain an advantage against you on race (and sex) alone.
That's why (left/socialist/black lives matter/Muslim?) anti-racist is a code-word for anti-white and left/female feminism is just anti-male / pro-female sexism.
Yeah I know you saw that one coming. And it doesn't matter. It's still the truth and you've got nothing to do or say against it. You prove it yourself.
Enjoy your new fuck-hole.
Your post is just another example of it.
The whole point of your post is that it's ok to treat the white man as shit and that white genocide doesn't matter.
There's not really much to argue about or against it. You express it and show it yourself.
In Sweden it's viewed as totally fine to threat white men in whatever negative way, it's good and doesn't matter whatsoever and if white men think that's bad or unfair then who the fuck gives a shit?
Also it's common to think that white-genocide is good anyway so who cares? If all white especially men died / went away the world would be a better place anyway so even if there was a white-genocide it would be good and is totally unproblematic.
It's the white (male) privilege. The privilege to don't matter, be blamed for everything and having everyone else gain an advantage against you on race (and sex) alone.
That's why (left/socialist/black lives matter/Muslim?) anti-racist is a code-word for anti-white and left/female feminism is just anti-male / pro-female sexism.
Yeah I know you saw that one coming. And it doesn't matter. It's still the truth and you've got nothing to do or say against it. You prove it yourself.
In Swedish law you have to willingly express threat or disrespect against at-least one of a few predefined groups of people in a message which has been spread. But it's not hate-speech if that is done only in private or if it's part of a and down-to-earth / objective discussion.
I don't remember what I wrote and I don't care very much and worst case scenario eventually I would be sentenced for my beliefs and still be very proud of that sentence because I stood my ground and told what I believed in regardless.
But to tell Muslim is a specific group, or rather that Islam is a specific ideology which make it hard to integrate Muslims into anything else of course is just the way it is. However that being correct unlikely is enough to get away from hate-speech laws. However if I explained why, though to me the Quran seem to be full of conflicts on the subject, for instance in that the Quran tell the followers to not take friends among the unbelievers and was utterly full of hate-speech against us and informed the believers on a lot of ways how we are less worthy and how god hates us and so on then it would unlikely be hate-speech any longer because I was just discussing how Islam is from what it was and how that become an issue.
I don't know the places and the exact wording but of course some will find support for how they shouldn't make friends with us and possibly not also follow us, and I think also be very harsh on and possibly punish us / fight us. On the other hand I've at-least seen one INTERPRETATION of the text together WITH AN ASSUMPTION in that Muslims should follow the contracts they set up so to say and that entering a place with non-Muslim as a refugee would be a case where you so to say promise to accept/follow the laws of that place (though there most unlikely is no such actual thing in Sweden and the refugees unlikely have promised shit against the Swedish people or nation) and as such they would be bound to follow our laws (then again they are also bound to follow the laws of Islam and there may be conflicts which then still leads to a conflict.) There's also all this talk about how there's no obligation to follow the religion, how God has blocked our mind / eyes, ears and so on from seeing the truth and also the argument that since God has done this and is so powerful he himself could had made us believers if he wanted too but he obviously haven't and as such why would any mere human try to interfere with his decision? Then again maybe that's just someone reasoning and not part of the Quran.
Anyway, reality is that Islam as it's so political and all-inclusive make it hard to mix it with western societies. There's no full democracy in Islam (the laws are already told by God), there's no complete freedom of religion (you're not allowed to leave Islam), there's no equality (Muslims are way better than non-believers, female witness are less worthy and beneficiaries get less heritage), there's not freedom of speech (insult the prophet or I guess also be the enemy of Islam and face the consequences) and there's unlikely any respect for whatever democratic reasoned law society may decide which is against the law of Islam and will of God and his prophet.
Hate and hate. I definitely don't want them here because of said reason. For instance when it comes to that contract part what happen to the children of those refugees? They surely haven't agreed on anything by just being born here just as I myself haven't either so I don't see why I should be bound to this fascist hate-speech law in the first place. I would be happy enough with them staying in their space though.
Personally I think hate-speech laws are stupid. The US doesn't have them and are ethnically diverse and somewhat stable anyhow.
Jaja, aber Kartoffelbrei, ich bin mit der Fernsehrturm verheiraten.
I care far more about freedom from religion than freedom of religion.
Ditto.
Swedish feminists are working FOR separated baths for women and men (possibly because "all men are bad" but that's of course not the case.)
Personally since I would put myself in the very free and liberal place (but not so liberal that I'll give a free pass to those who want to take it away if I can avoid it (freedom should be the only part of our constitution)) I don't really feel all that ok with ideas like banning the veil (which is also a stupid suggestion because it make the topic about a piece of cloth which of course totally doesn't have to be banned and pose no threat whatsoever whereas Islamic schools and kindergartens and Wahhabist/Salafist mosques never enter the dialogue at all even though those are the real problem) though I totally don't want to bring that people here .. Uhm.. I don't remember where I was going with this. Anyway Swedish society easily bends over and adjust for Islamism for whatever reason and Islamophobia is accepted as a real issue and phobia even though there's nothing phobic at all in being afraid of Islam and Muslims.
Anyone else we can easily live with because only the Muslims behave this way. Islamophobia isn't a problem and responsibility of the rest of the world. It's all about how Muslims behave and have Islam is.
Over here freedom of speech is restricted and EU allow restrictions on freedom of religion for the same reason as on speech so if their idiotic claim of "equal value" really was something we should force upon society they should just say that that include religion too and then good by Islam.
We've got this fuckface Muslim who cried about how whatever was a breach of freedom of religion but of course that person doesn't really care about freedom but only care about Islam and he is totally fine speaking up against Lars Wilks who made the round-about dog which looked like Muhammed being allowed to speak or show artwork so he obviously doesn't accept freedom of speech.
The thing is that without freedom they themselves wouldn't be accepted themselves (by us), only freedom for everyone and acceptance of that from everyone will grant freedom for everyone but these people don't really accept that and hence do they deserve any themselves then? You're either free or you aren't. Here you may hear things like "it's not freedom of speech to ...", yes it is, but freedom of speech is restricted here so there's a case of non-freedom of speech which is about what they mention. But that's not a freedom.
And you are convinced that there is no way to detect the bad ones, and no way for the good ones to fully assimilate? Literally the only solution is to keep inferior people out?
Is? Of course it's possible.
But in this land of "everyone are of equal value except the white man and those who don't want to let anyone in for whatever reason and forever" none of that is being done.
The IS warriors are welcome back and will get help to get a job or whatever.
It is your voice that is mostly ignored.
I'm well aware of that.
What I meant was that if Facebook doesn't deal with Germany then shouldn't they be able to simply say fuck off to them?
So you aren't speaking for the majority in Sweden after all.
I am speaking for the majority of the Swedes when it come to how many refugees should be brought it.
Immigration is still at the very top together with was it hospital and possibly school? among the Swedish people having dropped from being the single most important thing for the Swedish people. But before it haven't been the most important thing and for many it of course aren't and some even want more refugees. Anyway as such when people vote they vote on a party DUE OF A MULTITUDE OF REASONS not ONLY BECAUSE OF WHAT THEY IMMIGRATION POLITICS IS! Hence people haven't voted for the only party which has been against this retardness (a situation which likely happened because that party thought so and then everyone was like "oh no the Nazis are coming!" so they dug themselves deep onto the mud in a "Sweden for everyone or Nazi!"-message.)
Who exactly gives you the mandate to speak for the majority of the Europeans then?
I have no mandate to do so I just do so.
What idiots like you with your consistent lies don't mention is that there are polls which are made regarding immigration which for instance ask whatever Sweden should take in more or less immigrants and in such a poll less will come out higher than more consistently and as such obviously the Swedes want less immigrants. .. They aren't what one should vote for unless one is an ideological nutcase.
That they vote on traitor parties which don't care about that part and flood us with immigrants is a different story. Sure it's totally mental to vote on those idiots and traitors but they do so. Personally I myself have voted on the environmentalist party which are the most extreme when it comes to mass-immigration and I've done so for three elections in a row but I of course didn't do so because I loved immigrants so much I did so because I thought trying to solve the impact of global warming for instance once it had already happened would be more expensive than adjusting in an attempt to never let it go that far. I care about the environment and non-humans of the planet but that doesn't mean I want hundred of thousands of Muslims to come to my land every year. It's two different questions even if the same party may want to have both of them. It's one of the most progressive parties of Sweden but they are more or less complete nutcases with no care whatsoever to what happened to the people or the economy so
The last time I was in Sweden was in 1992 and people like you are the reason why it will stay that way.
Stay how? I guess you don't mean in Sweden but rather why you won't visit?
Back in 1992 we had the then highest flow of immigrants back then from former Yugoslavia, the anti-immigration movement was stronger back then but then the establishment more or less killed it but in their last attempt to keep on killing it by giving no influence to the Sweden democrats and by flooding Sweden with MORE immigrants in an attempt to show that voting for the Sweden democrats was futile backfired and now it's one of the three largest parties in Sweden so.. they kinda fucked that one up by making us desperate. They will likely try even more but then maybe people will act even more desperate.. Good times .. Idiots.
Same goes for Poland by the way.
Poland and Sweden isn't comparable. In Poland being against immigrant is totally common, they are a sane nation not flooded with that shit. The number of Swedes who talk like I do is a very small part of the Swedish population. Sure people think they have brought in too many immigrants but the people are friendly and don't want to upset others so
The claim I read the last time was two children and 27 200 SEK which is $2914.
http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyhe...
Says a family with three children and mention 28 000 SEK = $3000 precisely.
There's this one from 2013 which gives a number more in line with what you claim with 22 249 SEK / month but that one is three years old whereas the one with 28 000 SEK / month is from this year:
https://ladycobra.wordpress.co...
Regarding SFI (Swedish for immigrants):
http://www.aftonbladet.se/sena...
4/10 follow through.
22% drop completely mostly because of getting a job according to that one.
http://www.op.se/opinion/ledar...
Says 1/3 finish SFI.
I have no idea if people actually lose the money on a scale worth mentioning.
On the other hand there's those who "separate" to have double benefits and double housing and then rent out one of them and live together anyway, or the cheating with assistants or fake consultation for getting a job or a fake job (or a fake job to get to stay as a "working immigrant") and so on.
The more welfare solutions and providers with poor regulation the more chances to cheat the system.
28 000 with three children is still $3000 and that's after taxes for no work whatsoever.
The reason for such absurdity is the idea that all children should be brought up in a similar environment and that's nice and all BUT YOU CAN'T OFFER THAT FOR THE WHOLE FUCKING WORLD IN A NATIONAL SYSTEM AND STILL MAINTAIN A GOOD LIVING STANDARD YOURSELF!
All "refugees" aren't refugees.
All "refugees" doesn't come from metropolitan areas.
All "refugees" doesn't come from Syria and Iraq.
Whatever amount of Muslims doesn't want to assimilate.
Even if they want to get a job plenty don't have the educational standard of a Swede and even if they did they would be culturally disabled.
You are fake news.
I assume the system is designed for those who are actually supposed to be here. It should had been branded as such. However the idiots has brought stuff like "equal value and rights" into our .. form document of the government (part of our "constitution.")
Asylum activists and people who "are good" are interpreting and doing there thing. Civil servants in Sweden no longer have any responsibility for what they do so.. Go ahead.
There is a "foreigner law" in Sweden which state that the municipality and such should help the police to deport foreigners who are here illegally but there's restrictions on that they have to be "orderly received" in the other nation or something and plenty of nations where they come form don't accept their own people back if they are deported (Somalia, Iran, Afghanistan, likely a whole bunch more) so they "can't" be deported.
But yeah, even if the text would be formulated so it would include everyone which is a completely retarded idea then the foreigner law should help make sure any illegal immigrant (in Sweden called "Paper less" like if they just happened to lack their passport) was returned. But the system doesn't work and I wouldn't be surprised if the laws haven't been designed as non-functional as they are with that purpose in mind.
Plenty of studies showed that removing the worry of securing a living is a sure path to a peaceful and thriving society.
But a society with 4.5 million workers can't offer that for the whole world. Do it globally or do it nationally with closed borders but don't do it nationally offering it for everyone.
I'm not morally to help. Even less these fucktards who rape and murder. What about them? They have no obligations? They sure as hell aren't executed or forced out themselves. Though they should be. Also lots of people come from Somalia, Eritrea and Iran (Afghanistan.)
Of course liberal societies over there would be the best but they suffer a hard case of Islam and the US and various Arab states fight for influence in the region. Sweden not so much .. Feel free to argue that the US should take them in rather than us though.
But all "refugees" aren't refugees either. And even if they are refugees why should they have right to any welfare system / slave labor at all?
Russia want Assad to win and the US want Assad out likely because he's allied with Russia. Germany are most often trying to be friend with both Russia and the US so I don't know if you can state all that much that they are involved in it and Sweden of course shouldn't take part in that at all but the Swedish government is scaremongering against Russia likely because they are traitors themselves and want us to find a different (and common?) enemy. The idiots will vote against Russia and the place we give the most money is terrorist Palestine like if they deserved it the most. Our Social democrats view their party as their sister party ... Fuck socialists everywhere.
Syrians have taken the bicycle over from Russia to Norway so I'm pretty sure they have indeed come to Russia and I assume Russia may take them in but economy and living standard matters and the reality is that not even places like Italy and France are good enough for these leeches. It's northern Europe or UK which they want too. A high percentage of those who ask for asylum in Bulgaria gets it but these leeches don't want to live in Bulgaria because that's a poor country by European standards.
Why the fuck would I go to Aleppo you retard? Society have no right to tax or enforce any law on me for all I care. I haven't agreed to anything such. If I wanted to sign a deal for whatever then I could do so myself.
Freedom of speech and freedom of religion in the EU can be restricted for lots of reasons.
Of course they can outlaw criticism of refugees.
Google translate this:
http://jyllands-posten.dk/inte...
https://translate.google.se/tr...
"EU Parliament wants countries to speak well of refugees
Member states should stay away from hate speech about refugees for their own political gain."
"EU member states must refrain from encouraging fear and hatred against migrants and asylum seekers for their own political gain.
It says the European Parliament in a new report on fundamental rights. It's Tuesday has been voted through parliament with an overwhelming majority.
- We have seen an increase in hate speech from political parties throughout Europe, says JÃzsef Nagy, a member of the EPP Group in the European Parliament and rapporteur for the report.
EU spokesman for the Danish People's Party Kenneth Kristensen Berth said recently that the EU's border guards can use warning shots against boat people. The shots were to get migrants to return.
It may be an example of a hateful expression in the EU Parliament will curb, says JÃzsef Nagy.
- We experience these outbreaks and it is not only in Denmark but throughout Europe.
- I do not think that he is serious about shooting refugees, but we must be vigilant. We can not allow the political dialogue become violent threats, says Nagy.
Instead of the negatively charged dialogue should member states according to the report promoting the European values ââof freedom and equality.
Tolerance and a sense of community will counter stigma. At the same time it will prevent radicalization and violent extremism, says the European Parliament in the report.
In addition, it will help EU citizens to have a more positive view of integration.
- Our union must not only deal say with legal and financial problems. The EU must also deal with the question of fundamental rights and set a good example, says JÃzsef Nagy."
The majority likely don't want to be invaded by them, I know that here in Sweden the majority consistently wish for less. And that's in a lied upon system which I think may also have the most positive people in the EU towards it? But feel free to give actual evidence for what you claim rather than just stating it.
They don't need to die. Here in Sweden lots of private services are bought with public funding. We could simply buy refugee shelter of whatever quality we thought was decent from the lowest bidder among other nations. Preferably nations which are closed to the area where there is trouble. Alternatively we could just not offer them any citizenship or welfare and then they came anyway or they didn't and went somewhere else instead.
Then the German police will raid Facebook's German offices.
Just close them down and ignore the Germans?
Speak for yourself.
As for volumes I'm speaking for the majority even in Sweden and I of course also speak for the majority of the Europeans.
I'm only here because enough people did not have your shitty attitude to my great grandparents who were also refugees from persecution.
My opinion doesn't even matter since the ruling elite is possibly even beyond the EU but if nothing else there and that's law which become superior to Swedish law and even if that wasn't the case Sweden is a consensus democrature where established media and the political elite holds hands and go their own way and don't listen to the people but rather tell the people what they should believe and accept.
I can raise it (and be hushed in all mainstream and social media and possibly jailed or killed for it) but unless half+ of the Swedish population voted for the same alternative it will have little result. And even then as said we're ruled by the EU and they can still decide against the will of the Swedish politicians and people. We could of course leave the EU and should. Eventually if we talked things like deportation the UN would likely be upset too.
Also the attitude isn't shitty just because you say so. It's a sane attitude.
If nothing else the welfare system should be completely abolished so we don't attract people who don't want freedom and Swedish culture but come from the money such as the guy who punched out the teeth of the teacher who talked to his wife. He's obviously not here because of his great knowledge about the Swedes and their society beyond how much money he could leech from the system.
I wrote a reply just after how I meant an American COMPANY and how I hadn't eaten yet but I couldn't post it then because of the time delay and then it never got posted.
What I meant was that Facebook is an American company and I don't necessarily see why whatever national law should apply to any country in the world.
Then again that may very well be how it is in this case.
I of course never meant Germany was part of America.
Except the refugees ARE the problem.
Here in Sweden we haven't got enough taxation to cover spending of the government or the municipalities right now and even then it's about 44% of GDP.
An immigrant family with two children can receive $3000 / month AFTER TAXES with no work whatsoever.
How many such families do you think it's ok to bring into Sweden?
Germany grant more welfare than the US and Sweden grant more than Germany. That's why they come here. Too leech. Within the last day or two I heard about a teacher who had got his teeth punched out because the teacher was talking to a woman who was his wife. That's what you get with Muslims. Everyone else is no problem culturally but Muslims are and will be because their vile hate-ideology doesn't want them to adjust or accept our ways.
Mexicans into the US would if not completely at-least to a higher degree be work immigration whereas our immigration are refugee/sponge immigration and Muslim colonization. The Mexicans unlikely will destroy the culture of the US I guess (vote democrats?), the Muslims will definitely destroy our culture.
You can't compare the two.
Also the number of refugees who came to Sweden was like 35 times as many / capita as to the US so yeah.. there's a volume difference. But the US system have a stronger freedom and democracy and robustness / conservatism in the system and have lower welfare and likely don't even open up for the trash we get here. Your system is better suited for it and you still don't bring in even close to as many.
(Also US and allies like Saudi-Arabia and Turkey is what support the rebels and religious extremism in Syria and Iraq and it's the US who got rid of Gadaffi and Hussein and want to get rid of Assad too. You're part of the reason the genuine refugees even exist.)
.. in the first place?
It's an American country.
What happen if Facebook simply says "fuck off"?
Now the EU are banning (?) negative speak about refugees from the parties.
But how is that even the problem? The problem is that our traitor government let these people in in the first place. We don't want them here. That's the scenario. Why are they brought in? EU, Germany and Sweden are the enemies of the European peoples and democracy.
There's a difference in paying for games rather than not doing so though.
It already says Swede.
Guess 500 times.
Hint: It's not and I'm not in Saudi-Arabia.
The only people I don't want to see "brought here" are racists like you.
Hardly relevant ass-face because I'm where I belong.
what kind of pipe they use for this kinda thing, im thinking some kind of ceramic metal hybrid?? Temps and sulfer corrosion must be a major PITA to deal with.
Thorium?
/ Swede.
See what I did there?
But I have no fucking clue.
Amazing Scandinavians. Utterly destroyed by treason from our ass-holes of politicians and the social-liberal left. WTF where you thinking?
I understand the concept: "It may bring problems if we talk badly about some people" - it's ok as long as you don't bring them here. But you know.. bringing Muslims into a nation and the poor into a welfare system isn't without consequences either.
I thought the $500 just came from a redditer who had made up his own spread-sheet with prices and scores (which was guesstimated?), but maybe there was more to it because wccftech didn't abandoned it afterwards. Or maybe there wasn't.
One one hand even at $500 AMD would get lots more money / CPU than with current FX processors.
On the other hand why charge that when Intel charges like $1100?
On the third hand I guess they want to become popular again and hence out-price Intel.
Ask my government to nuke all Muslims.
But now I'm Swede so I'm not allowed to and we don't have any nukes anyway :D
But this was relative 1800:1 so it seem pretty fair.
Though isn't most IPS more like 800:1-1000:1 so maybe it's dynamic after all.
If all it did was shutter off the back-light to create something completely black then I don't care much.
But since someone else suggested it was like two LCDs on top of each other I assume normal LCDs can actually restrict the light-flow to varying degree considering they can show different brightness after-all and as such I guess it would actually scale the brightness through the whole range and if so it's interesting.