EITHER OR: 1) DON'T REBOOT MY FUCKING COMPUTER WHEN I DON'T WANT TOO! Now you don't even get a time mentioned, and you can't delay it (using their own user shown user-interface at-least), you can't set active hours less for more than 12 hours a day either. Microsoft will reboot your computer whenever the fuck they want too. Such as last night. 2) FIX THEIR FUCKING OS SO THE WHOLE MACHINE DOESN'T HAVE TO BE REBOOTED FOR EVERY FUCKING UPGRADE!
Fuck the anti-human dictatorshit idiots at Microsoft. Trash by design. But it runs the most games.
I'm not a troll. I just hate immigrants. Hardly on topic and the first post was supposed to be posted AC. On the other hand I'm no chicken and I want to be able to get a reply and follow up / let others follow up.
Week 32-34 to Sweden with total at the end.: "SYRIEN 71 111 82 264 AFGHANISTAN 47 51 51 149 IRAK 48 57 37 142 SOMALIA 36 26 21 83 ERITREA 32 25 23 80 IRAN 26 21 26 73 STATSLÃ-S 18 26 17 61 TURKIET 17 23 14 54 ALBANIEN 9 19 14 42 GEORGIEN 13 11 18 42"
So mostly Syrians, or claimed to be Syrians. I don't know Syrian politics and society enough to really discuss it but I assume both dictatorship and Islamism is cause for the lack of freedom and peace there currently, possibly between secular and Islamist values too - a conflict we have imported to Sweden and will suffer under here too.
Poor is relative. As is many homes in Syria is completely destroyed and people have left them and have nothing to go back with and no functional village / cities and no work and so on. Which make them very poor - regardless of what has been. People likely flee Syria both for safety and a functional society but also because it's fucked up right now (and it will cost lots of money and effort to rebuild it.) War cost a lot of money and it's no economical injection and awesome for the economy. It's just a cost. Sure they need more work to be done but they need it just to acquire what they already had. It brings no development. If they had used that money and performed that work onto what they had before they would have a better Syria than what they had.
As for Afghanistan it's very poor and in likely in general and in some places even more the perspective of improving your life situation is likely slim.
Iraq somewhat poor with broken government and good reasons to flee for some.
Somalia is also very poor with little functional government.
Eritea is also very poor and is a dictatorship and young men have to do military service for years which some doesn't want to do. Though we've had that system here too.
Iran somewhat poor non-free and a religitard country. Some people get a decent education but it's still a non-free country with slim possibilities. Sweden is way better.
Stateless.. well, I don't know who these are, Palestinians among other? Poor, non-free non-functional shit-hole.
Turkey, guess some of those are coup refugees, some others people who had gotten permission to be in Turkey and move on maybe? Maybe minorities? Also getting towards non-free dictatorship but better than the others.
Albania former communist shit-hole, majority Islamic nation like all the others above too. Very poor for being in Europe and unlikely great possibilities of making it into anything. Complete trash just like the other communist nations including Bulgaria and Romania and yet a bunch of idiots want that shit.
Georgia yet another socialist / communist / soviet success nation. Poor as fuck. This one have a majority of Christians though so it stands out there.
All communist nations are poor and crap but yay we must go there again!! It's awesome! Socialists know best!
Sweden is a rich welfare society where immigrants have a hard time getting a job. = They cost a lot of money.
The same amount of money spent on vaccination for instance would save many more lives. The same money spend on food packages, farming equipment, schooling would transform regions and save many more lives and make their lives better.
Also it would push down fertility so they would both have better lives and not a quickly growing population. If one don't change their society they will just be even more and still remain poor in the future which mean even more of them will have to move here if that's the only solution which will keep on being inefficiency and not save as many lives or improving life for as many as it could had been had the money been spent where it was the most efficient = cheap to reach the goal you wanted to reach.
Given the current Presidential campaigns we can now definitively rule out Earth...
Yup, any people willing to vote for Hillary, the EU, our Swedish prime minister and the seven parties which think immigration is good, voting for Islam or Christianity = all idiots.
And then what?.. But I don't know if one will necessarily be safe with regular backups too, what about if it infect and then start encrypting files later? Sure you don't need to boot and run anything from that file-system but..
Replace violence with physical violence only and we've got something.
Threat of violence haven't become violence yet either, though people may of course fear it and it may still have an effect so I'll accept that (but it's still not actual violence.)
(Or that it's somehow the menÂs fault there are few women who choose IT or industry jobs (garbage men less of a problem than CEO positions for some reason) as their interest and work.)
Sweden is progressive and consider itself in the front end for all things politics.
Whatever that's race-biology and mass-sterilization or mass-immigration and rejecting the idea that cultures/societies may have different values and that people may act differently because of that depending on what they are used to / where they were brought up.
I've your considered the "dump site" of social media, web media, the dump paper or television channel or whatever you've got to have done at-least one thing right.
It was all in her imagination of course, but still.
Can you explain to me how one can be violent through Twitter? IMHO reporting tweets you don't like in hope for them to be removed is the most violent thing you can do on it but beyond that?
Fuck you you violent bastard (It's only fair right? I mean, I don't agree with your opinion either.)
The problem is that I can't do shit about it either.
I live in Sweden a country which used to be pretty free and have pretty great lengths of freedom for this but I can't set up an uncensored services here without any issues and I have no idea where it could be done. If it could be done I of course would do so and have any freedom loving person leave these restrictive shit services.
Facebook is complete garbage and from a technological / usable side twitter is too, the only advantage they have is that that's where the users are, everything else about them stinks.
But their hate is good and not a problem at all and if everyone followed them all would be just fine!
And then they reject the idea that their ideology is a religion without a god (or the opposite that Islam is a political ideology with a god which is also called a religion, whatever.)
These idiots shouldn't censor shit. If you don't agree just reject or ignore it. If just the rest of us had such an easy solution to their shit but no, we have to suffer under it too.
I had lots of interaction on twitter until suddenly I more or less was an island. Now I can't even access my account due to unusual activity which has made it so I had to give them my phone number but they don't allow my phone number and eventually it was blocked off (likely from me trying password reminders and trying to set the phone number multiple times.)
The assholes don't answer to support messages about the account either and give no help whatsoever.
It's such a disaster the communication of the whole world is dominated by so few players and that these anti-liberal idiots manage to have their prayers of restrictions upon freedom of thought, raising opinion, discussions, information, speech, spreading ideas and so on.
Some idiots will even make claims like "It's not freedom of speech to spread hate!", yes it is, it's a restriction of freedom of speech to now allow it, of course.
For FPU it depends on what kind of operation. New high-end intel SKU's are supporting AVX512, whereas Zen will only support AVX 256 natively, However very few consumer application would notice the difference anyways. Zen is an entirely new design and shouldn't suffer the crippling FPU limitation of Bulldozer and it's refinements
My post wasn't about Zen at all. It was about the current processors.
A lot of idiots think AMD processors are better and cheaper and offer better performance simply because they are branded AMD not because that actually is the case.
Here in Sweden: FX-8370: 1890 SEK FX-8370E: 1620 SEK FX-8350: 1690 SEK FX-8350 with Wraith cooler: 1811 SEK. i5 6400 Box: 1868 SEK. i5 6500 Box: 2006 SEK.
I'd definitely take the i5 6400 over the FX-8350.
I've seen FX-8300-series processors closer to the i3 pricing though. FX-8320: 1390 SEK FX-8320E: 1328 SEK FX-8300: 1299 SEK FX-6350 with Wraith: 1308 SEK FX-6350: 1249 SEK FX-6300: 990 SEK
So with those you're in i3 territory: i3 6320: 1594 SEK i3 6300: 1390 SEK i3 6100: 1149 SEK G4400: 565 SEK
I think the i5 6500 and the i3 6100 is the processors to consider (and the older G3258 maybe?), those are the Intel processors which have the best value. Similarly I think the FX-8320 may have the best value of that line?
Anyway, they are close enough and given a choice I'd pick the i5 6400 over the FX-8350 easily. And I'd pick an i3 6100 over the FX-6300 - FX-6350 too.
The Pentium Dual is like 1/3 of the price (565 SEK vs 1690 SEK), I have no idea where you've "seen" your numbers but they are completely off.
It is close and the Intel processors are most likely better for games which is where they matter for me. And i5 6500 will likely keep up with the over-locked FX-8350 in gaming. https://youtu.be/xKR04WMP9sw?t...
Both chips are competitively priced against each other just as the graphics cards are. There's no performance advantage in picking the AMD chip over the Intel one in a given price category unless for integrated graphics because they are faster there. As said.
What is a "much nicer" motherboard? If anything the cheap AM3+ motherboards have huge issues running the FX processors even at stock speeds. Plenty of people who have motherboards which is supposed to support the FX-6300 but which can't run it anyway. AMD doesn't have any processors with PCI-express 3.0 support. You can get cheap H110 motherboards too and at-least your build will actually WORK with those.
The FX-8000 series is worse for games than i5, http://www.gamersnexus.net/gam... Fallout 4, 1440p, Ultra, 980Ti i3 4130: 53 FPS average, 33 FPS 0.1% low. FX-8370E: 51 FPS average, 33 FPS 0.1% low. FX-8320E: 50 FPS average, 31 FPS 0.1% low. The i5? i5 4690K: 71 FPS average, 45 FPS 0.1% low.
An i3 keep up in the 6300-8300 territory and an i5 beats it. An overclocked i5 the AMD chips can't keep up with.
An AMD APU doesn't cost "a lot less" than an i3 with integrated graphics. They are pretty expensive I'd say. Compare the Athlon II X4 860K vs the A10 7850K, you pay a lot for that pretty shitty but functional integrated graphics. The G4400 and the i3 6100 cost similarly and you will of course have "excellent picture quality and hardware accelerated video" with the i3 6100 too.
In non-FPU easily parallellized tasks maybe they even have an advantage. In FPU tasks or single core performance definitely not.
In general they aren't attractive even on price I'd say.
The problem is that they can't keep up on performance and they aren't really interesting enough to pick over Intel even at the cheaper tiers (except the APUs if you have no graphics card.)
If this benchmark was well-chosen (or if say they will clock lower) and actual performance is more in line with an 8 core Zen performing as a 6 core Intel processor then Intel can just say "be 6 core consumer desktop processors" and they will make it so and.. well.. That was that. It brought 6 core processors to the mainstream consumers and one can still support AMD but not necessarily a compelling reason to pick them because of performance or price / performance.
After using a Windows 10 mobile device (a tablet) for a few hours now, all I can say is holy shit, does Windows suck on touch devices. Christ almighty, even in "tablet" mode, it's just bloody awful. No wonder Microsoft's mobile plans are falling through, what a fucking disgrace. Even early versions of iOS and Android had a better user experience. Please Nokia, be done with Windows.
That part of the business is Microsofts now so Nokia is indeed done with it.
N900 should had been released with Android rather than Maemo and things would had been different.
Nokia, Nvidia, Sony and Apple are all too greedy for my tastes. Nokia had to have (the sales of) everything, Nvidia is just as much into vendor-lock in Apple, Sony may have learned but it took them time. Apple and Nvidia both seem to be able to pull it off but that's likely "only" because their products "are so good."
Slashdot Mirror
... should really fix:
EITHER OR:
1) DON'T REBOOT MY FUCKING COMPUTER WHEN I DON'T WANT TOO! Now you don't even get a time mentioned, and you can't delay it (using their own user shown user-interface at-least), you can't set active hours less for more than 12 hours a day either. Microsoft will reboot your computer whenever the fuck they want too. Such as last night.
2) FIX THEIR FUCKING OS SO THE WHOLE MACHINE DOESN'T HAVE TO BE REBOOTED FOR EVERY FUCKING UPGRADE!
Fuck the anti-human dictatorshit idiots at Microsoft.
Trash by design. But it runs the most games.
I'm not a troll. I just hate immigrants. Hardly on topic and the first post was supposed to be posted AC. On the other hand I'm no chicken and I want to be able to get a reply and follow up / let others follow up.
Week 32-34 to Sweden with total at the end.:
"SYRIEN 71 111 82 264
AFGHANISTAN 47 51 51 149
IRAK 48 57 37 142
SOMALIA 36 26 21 83
ERITREA 32 25 23 80
IRAN 26 21 26 73
STATSLÃ-S 18 26 17 61
TURKIET 17 23 14 54
ALBANIEN 9 19 14 42
GEORGIEN 13 11 18 42"
So mostly Syrians, or claimed to be Syrians. I don't know Syrian politics and society enough to really discuss it but I assume both dictatorship and Islamism is cause for the lack of freedom and peace there currently, possibly between secular and Islamist values too - a conflict we have imported to Sweden and will suffer under here too.
Poor is relative. As is many homes in Syria is completely destroyed and people have left them and have nothing to go back with and no functional village / cities and no work and so on. Which make them very poor - regardless of what has been. People likely flee Syria both for safety and a functional society but also because it's fucked up right now (and it will cost lots of money and effort to rebuild it.)
War cost a lot of money and it's no economical injection and awesome for the economy. It's just a cost. Sure they need more work to be done but they need it just to acquire what they already had. It brings no development. If they had used that money and performed that work onto what they had before they would have a better Syria than what they had.
As for Afghanistan it's very poor and in likely in general and in some places even more the perspective of improving your life situation is likely slim.
Iraq somewhat poor with broken government and good reasons to flee for some.
Somalia is also very poor with little functional government.
Eritea is also very poor and is a dictatorship and young men have to do military service for years which some doesn't want to do. Though we've had that system here too.
Iran somewhat poor non-free and a religitard country. Some people get a decent education but it's still a non-free country with slim possibilities. Sweden is way better.
Stateless.. well, I don't know who these are, Palestinians among other? Poor, non-free non-functional shit-hole.
Turkey, guess some of those are coup refugees, some others people who had gotten permission to be in Turkey and move on maybe? Maybe minorities? Also getting towards non-free dictatorship but better than the others.
Albania former communist shit-hole, majority Islamic nation like all the others above too. Very poor for being in Europe and unlikely great possibilities of making it into anything. Complete trash just like the other communist nations including Bulgaria and Romania and yet a bunch of idiots want that shit.
Georgia yet another socialist / communist / soviet success nation. Poor as fuck. This one have a majority of Christians though so it stands out there.
All communist nations are poor and crap but yay we must go there again!! It's awesome! Socialists know best!
Sweden is a rich welfare society where immigrants have a hard time getting a job.
= They cost a lot of money.
The same amount of money spent on vaccination for instance would save many more lives. The same money spend on food packages, farming equipment, schooling would transform regions and save many more lives and make their lives better.
Also it would push down fertility so they would both have better lives and not a quickly growing population. If one don't change their society they will just be even more and still remain poor in the future which mean even more of them will have to move here if that's the only solution which will keep on being inefficiency and not save as many lives or improving life for as many as it could had been had the money been spent where it was the most efficient = cheap to reach the goal you wanted to reach.
what is this obsession with making things thin, the space it saves is almost irrelevant and tactile feed back is a wonderful thing.
Smaller battery.
Weaker processor.
Weaker graphics.
Cheaper keyboards.
Cheaper shipping.
= Money?
Given the current Presidential campaigns we can now definitively rule out Earth...
Yup, any people willing to vote for Hillary, the EU, our Swedish prime minister and the seven parties which think immigration is good, voting for Islam or Christianity = all idiots.
Unsurprisingly it was in Russia.
Europe and America is doomed by it's own suigenocide.
.. the search for intelligent life in the universe continues.
Trojan / virus encrypt your files.
And then what? .. But I don't know if one will necessarily be safe with regular backups too, what about if it infect and then start encrypting files later? Sure you don't need to boot and run anything from that file-system but ..
According to the study, it's the reverse. If you post more, you are less likely to be depressed
TFS:
The researchers found that happy people post less than depressed people
We can fill it with hydrogen if you want cheap out
Put the ship on dihydrogenoxide instead. You don't live near a source? Move?!
If anything being labeled as a "threat" by them triggers their threatening towards you.
Replace violence with physical violence only and we've got something.
Threat of violence haven't become violence yet either, though people may of course fear it and it may still have an effect so I'll accept that (but it's still not actual violence.)
(Or that it's somehow the menÂs fault there are few women who choose IT or industry jobs (garbage men less of a problem than CEO positions for some reason) as their interest and work.)
Sweden is progressive and consider itself in the front end for all things politics.
Whatever that's race-biology and mass-sterilization or mass-immigration and rejecting the idea that cultures/societies may have different values and that people may act differently because of that depending on what they are used to / where they were brought up.
WHAT the government does and enforce may have changed but it's still around and way to large and influential.
I've your considered the "dump site" of social media, web media, the dump paper or television channel or whatever you've got to have done at-least one thing right.
Violent?
Some girl considered me "threatening" yesterday.
It was all in her imagination of course, but still.
Can you explain to me how one can be violent through Twitter?
IMHO reporting tweets you don't like in hope for them to be removed is the most violent thing you can do on it but beyond that?
Fuck you you violent bastard (It's only fair right? I mean, I don't agree with your opinion either.)
The problem is that I can't do shit about it either.
I live in Sweden a country which used to be pretty free and have pretty great lengths of freedom for this but I can't set up an uncensored services here without any issues and I have no idea where it could be done. If it could be done I of course would do so and have any freedom loving person leave these restrictive shit services.
Facebook is complete garbage and from a technological / usable side twitter is too, the only advantage they have is that that's where the users are, everything else about them stinks.
Yeah, no bigger haters than the SJWs themselves.
But their hate is good and not a problem at all and if everyone followed them all would be just fine!
And then they reject the idea that their ideology is a religion without a god (or the opposite that Islam is a political ideology with a god which is also called a religion, whatever.)
These idiots shouldn't censor shit. If you don't agree just reject or ignore it. If just the rest of us had such an easy solution to their shit but no, we have to suffer under it too.
I had lots of interaction on twitter until suddenly I more or less was an island.
Now I can't even access my account due to unusual activity which has made it so I had to give them my phone number but they don't allow my phone number and eventually it was blocked off (likely from me trying password reminders and trying to set the phone number multiple times.)
The assholes don't answer to support messages about the account either and give no help whatsoever.
It's such a disaster the communication of the whole world is dominated by so few players and that these anti-liberal idiots manage to have their prayers of restrictions upon freedom of thought, raising opinion, discussions, information, speech, spreading ideas and so on.
Some idiots will even make claims like "It's not freedom of speech to spread hate!", yes it is, it's a restriction of freedom of speech to now allow it, of course.
For FPU it depends on what kind of operation. New high-end intel SKU's are supporting AVX512, whereas Zen will only support AVX 256 natively, However very few consumer application would notice the difference anyways. Zen is an entirely new design and shouldn't suffer the crippling FPU limitation of Bulldozer and it's refinements
My post wasn't about Zen at all. It was about the current processors.
A lot of idiots think AMD processors are better and cheaper and offer better performance simply because they are branded AMD not because that actually is the case.
Here in Sweden:
FX-8370: 1890 SEK
FX-8370E: 1620 SEK
FX-8350: 1690 SEK
FX-8350 with Wraith cooler: 1811 SEK.
i5 6400 Box: 1868 SEK.
i5 6500 Box: 2006 SEK.
I'd definitely take the i5 6400 over the FX-8350.
I've seen FX-8300-series processors closer to the i3 pricing though.
FX-8320: 1390 SEK
FX-8320E: 1328 SEK
FX-8300: 1299 SEK
FX-6350 with Wraith: 1308 SEK
FX-6350: 1249 SEK
FX-6300: 990 SEK
So with those you're in i3 territory:
i3 6320: 1594 SEK
i3 6300: 1390 SEK
i3 6100: 1149 SEK
G4400: 565 SEK
I think the i5 6500 and the i3 6100 is the processors to consider (and the older G3258 maybe?), those are the Intel processors which have the best value. Similarly I think the FX-8320 may have the best value of that line?
Anyway, they are close enough and given a choice I'd pick the i5 6400 over the FX-8350 easily. And I'd pick an i3 6100 over the FX-6300 - FX-6350 too.
The Pentium Dual is like 1/3 of the price (565 SEK vs 1690 SEK), I have no idea where you've "seen" your numbers but they are completely off.
It is close and the Intel processors are most likely better for games which is where they matter for me. And i5 6500 will likely keep up with the over-locked FX-8350 in gaming.
https://youtu.be/xKR04WMP9sw?t...
Both chips are competitively priced against each other just as the graphics cards are. There's no performance advantage in picking the AMD chip over the Intel one in a given price category unless for integrated graphics because they are faster there. As said.
What is a "much nicer" motherboard? If anything the cheap AM3+ motherboards have huge issues running the FX processors even at stock speeds. Plenty of people who have motherboards which is supposed to support the FX-6300 but which can't run it anyway. AMD doesn't have any processors with PCI-express 3.0 support. You can get cheap H110 motherboards too and at-least your build will actually WORK with those.
The FX-8000 series is worse for games than i5,
http://www.gamersnexus.net/gam...
Fallout 4, 1440p, Ultra, 980Ti
i3 4130: 53 FPS average, 33 FPS 0.1% low.
FX-8370E: 51 FPS average, 33 FPS 0.1% low.
FX-8320E: 50 FPS average, 31 FPS 0.1% low.
The i5?
i5 4690K: 71 FPS average, 45 FPS 0.1% low.
An i3 keep up in the 6300-8300 territory and an i5 beats it. An overclocked i5 the AMD chips can't keep up with.
An AMD APU doesn't cost "a lot less" than an i3 with integrated graphics. They are pretty expensive I'd say. Compare the Athlon II X4 860K vs the A10 7850K, you pay a lot for that pretty shitty but functional integrated graphics. The G4400 and the i3 6100 cost similarly and you will of course have "excellent picture quality and hardware accelerated video" with the i3 6100 too.
How about performance-per-dollar?
Depends on the task.
In non-FPU easily parallellized tasks maybe they even have an advantage.
In FPU tasks or single core performance definitely not.
In general they aren't attractive even on price I'd say.
The problem is that they can't keep up on performance and they aren't really interesting enough to pick over Intel even at the cheaper tiers (except the APUs if you have no graphics card.)
If this benchmark was well-chosen (or if say they will clock lower) and actual performance is more in line with an 8 core Zen performing as a 6 core Intel processor then Intel can just say "be 6 core consumer desktop processors" and they will make it so and .. well.. That was that. It brought 6 core processors to the mainstream consumers and one can still support AMD but not necessarily a compelling reason to pick them because of performance or price / performance.
After using a Windows 10 mobile device (a tablet) for a few hours now, all I can say is holy shit, does Windows suck on touch devices. Christ almighty, even in "tablet" mode, it's just bloody awful. No wonder Microsoft's mobile plans are falling through, what a fucking disgrace. Even early versions of iOS and Android had a better user experience. Please Nokia, be done with Windows.
That part of the business is Microsofts now so Nokia is indeed done with it.
Nokia was into lots of colors, perhaps that will be true here too!
And Microsoft was into brown. Maybe it will be brown?
N900 should had been released with Android rather than Maemo and things would had been different.
Nokia, Nvidia, Sony and Apple are all too greedy for my tastes. Nokia had to have (the sales of) everything, Nvidia is just as much into vendor-lock in Apple, Sony may have learned but it took them time. Apple and Nvidia both seem to be able to pull it off but that's likely "only" because their products "are so good."