Google seem to be traded at P/E 26 (Google finance, assume that's on actual profits and not ideas for the future) which is pretty reasonable. The interest environment is shit and Google at least have an urge to do new products. Whatever they will always be the search and information gathering giant I guess one could question.
Facebook mean-while is valued at P/E 75 which is way higher. Do I trust or care Facebook even remotely as much as Google? No I don't. I don't care for Facebook at all. So do their social platform deserve that? Then again at least they have made more money than before.
Something like Microsoft is 17.7 so whetever. H&M is 30 as comparison. Sure there's a bigger market to sell clothes to but there's a bigger one for Microsoft products too:).
I don't know how it works and I would assume they all have problems from below.
But if it was about anti-air defense shouldn't it be one of the stronger pieces at least Russia have? Or not? I read about some larger missile ship at some time and hope it's the right one. I just googled russian missile cruiser or something such but don't know if the class is correct.
Lots of S-300s on it for instance.
I've also assumed one could nuke a whole carrier group if one was ok to send nukes but I have no idea whatever that is the case.
It's all war discussions become so "mine is better than yours!"-like. May it be that both sides have the possibilities of attacking each other at various times?
I don't know how the various Aegis rate against the S-300, S-400 and S-500.
Maybe it was going into a black hole which was one of them?
I don't remember.
Do the mass have to be evenly distributed everywhere just because space itself has no boundaries?
My natural assumptions (I feel) would had been everything just was (no creation, not of space and not of planets and possibly not of life) and that space just continued on / was this giant space of unlimited size.
May be patches to Windows Defender database but not for Windows. I never said I always had to reboot. And I likely exaggerated.
The point was that Windows want me to reboot a lot and without additional hard to reach tweaking it even enforced reboot of its own will.
I don't care about patch Tuesday. I think it's stupid to not send out the updates as soon as possible. If companies don't want them then fine let them handle it. Thought I guess they would suffer from such a solution. Having updates isn't a problem. Windows requiring reboots and worse forcing me to reboot is the problem.
Try to get that out of your tiny (or gapping, what do I know) asshole (maybe it's just too much to try to get into your.. uhm.. ass to understand for you.)
Ohnoz, I'm wasting electricity. Thanks for telling me!
I've done that lots of years. Now I have functional sleep at least so sometimes but not always I use that which is much better than having it on. Hibernate doesn't work so I don't use that.
It is a problem. It may not be for you but it is for me. Get over it.
Windows did require me to restart, the restart after a week/a week + one day(?) was enforced.
And there we go again, yet another important upgrade now, in this case an update for Windows Defender so that one won't require a reboot AFAIK.
I may not install the upgrades as soon as they become available and hence they may add up before I finally install them so the occasions for them may be more often than on my machine.
So clearly there was 10 occasions in December, 6 in January and 5 so far in February for me.
Eat my ass regarding once a month the second Tuesday.
The ones regarding the base OS alone may be less frequent / once a month and maybe one don't have to reboot more often than that. It's not like I sit rebooting more often than I have to.
I'm not sure openSUSE tell me to reboot / I don't know how it expresses it.
Though I guess it would be interesting to get to know whatever any of the updates was security related or whatever it's just upgraded software in general.
Also Windows didn't just told you you should reboot or asked you whatever you wanted it.
It enforced the reboot regardless of what you picked.
I understand I need to reboot for the kernel stuff to happen but in Linux I would worry less about being without those upgrades than I would in Windows.
That I have no clue (though I guess there's some way to actually get one) what Windows updated doesn't help either.
But mostly it REALLY wants me to reboot whereas I assume a Linux message about it would be like "You need to reboot to to complete these updates" (for lack of better word / sentence.)
I feel like it's more than that. Mind you in this case it likely had wanted me to reboot for some time because I had some upgrades and when it was back up it kinda asked me to reboot again but I guess that may have been the second Tuesday in the month. As in maybe I rebooted on say Sunday and then again on Wednesday or something such.
As for updates only coming once a month I don't know.
I don't know whatever you run some rolling release / unstable version of it or not.
But my experience would be that kernel upgrades is what requires reboots and even if running openSUSE with updates and pacman repositories enable of course you'll get new kernels but it's not like you have to reboot because of that or that anyone is forcing you.
I don't know what Ubuntu says because I don't use it.
In Windows when you get updates it gives a generic "fixes some problems in product" and nothing more really and then a link you can click which open your web-browser to reach yet another "fixes various problems in.." without really saying what or why you should bother.
So you just have to install the crap and sometimes it ask you to reboot sometimes not.
And I feel like I get updates more often than once a month for my Windows installation.
And if it want to reboot it just say so, not why.
And back when I had just installed it it asked me whatever I wanted to reboot. I didn't, and then it said it would reboot the machine for me regardless in a week. Fuck that.
I got rid of that somehow (both that planned reboot and any such future activities) but it completely suck. Let me decide whatever I want to reboot please. And it's not like the solution for that problem was intuitive.
With Ubuntu I wouldn't feel like I had to reboot. Even if I got kernel upgrades so what? If it's not broken already changes are I wouldn't have to reboot. Whatever things some time in the future would rely on running the latest stuff I don't know. Maybe I would figure out at that time. I don't feel like I'm forced to reboot such a system at least.
And with "no-reboot" patches of the kernel even less so.
And watching a game on Youtube gives a very misleading impression of gameplay. In fact, I can't fucking stand watching other people play games - especially the kind of games I like, e.g. adventure, where the whole excitement comes from the challenge,
Try Twitch!
Trying to watch that with Flashblock / FlashControl and so on installed can be a real challenge!;D
Yeah, maybe comparing them to Rio is exaggerating but back in the late mp3-/media player days they was up there with Cowon/iAudio, iRiver and Sansa Clip as one of the finest you could get.
And then they decided to make an iPhone clone next.
I assume we're many outside of China who know who they are (and that there phones haven't been as successful, but I assume money and volumes can help with that.)
Slashdot Mirror
In that the companies make money this time?
Google seem to be traded at P/E 26 (Google finance, assume that's on actual profits and not ideas for the future) which is pretty reasonable. The interest environment is shit and Google at least have an urge to do new products. Whatever they will always be the search and information gathering giant I guess one could question.
Facebook mean-while is valued at P/E 75 which is way higher.
Do I trust or care Facebook even remotely as much as Google?
No I don't.
I don't care for Facebook at all. So do their social platform deserve that? Then again at least they have made more money than before.
Something like Microsoft is 17.7 so whetever. H&M is 30 as comparison. Sure there's a bigger market to sell clothes to but there's a bigger one for Microsoft products too :).
I know Sony used FreeBSD in the Playstation 4.
And it outsell Xbox One.
I don't know what Nintendo uses.
Unix won the desktop.. it's just called Mac OS X.
And the server market, and likely embedded by now including smartphones and tablets, TVs, possibly gaming consoles, ..
Or well, it was budget votes and it's more like 40+% didn't voted for their own budget but rather let this one pass.
That problem was solved 220 years ago. Since then the problem has been dumb voters. Democracy, as they say, is the government you deserve.
One could argue it's not true for Sweden.
Currently we're ruled by an alternative which got less than 38% of the votes.
On the other hand about 49% (I think) of the other elected people voted for that to happen.
I don't know how it works and I would assume they all have problems from below.
But if it was about anti-air defense shouldn't it be one of the stronger pieces at least Russia have? Or not? I read about some larger missile ship at some time and hope it's the right one. I just googled russian missile cruiser or something such but don't know if the class is correct.
Lots of S-300s on it for instance.
I've also assumed one could nuke a whole carrier group if one was ok to send nukes but I have no idea whatever that is the case.
It's all war discussions become so "mine is better than yours!"-like. May it be that both sides have the possibilities of attacking each other at various times?
I don't know how the various Aegis rate against the S-300, S-400 and S-500.
I have no idea how they compare and I would assume there's ways to nuke the group but what do I know.
Anyway as for Russian ships I guess this is a bitch:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K...
Yeah because clearly you can't make a missile which do what a plane with a person in it do better.
Isn't the terrorists superior?
You have little clue who will blow him- or herself up and when they do they take 25 people with them.
Guess at the extremes it's about as good as nuclear war between the two partners though.
Better for the environment though :)
The question though is will you be able to destroy all other players capitals before someone claims cultural victory?
How much credibility does this article lose once you put "Big Data" in there?
Is that when you have to load EMS386.SYS?
I think I've seen other solutions to that.
Maybe it was going into a black hole which was one of them?
I don't remember.
Do the mass have to be evenly distributed everywhere just because space itself has no boundaries?
My natural assumptions (I feel) would had been everything just was (no creation, not of space and not of planets and possibly not of life) and that space just continued on / was this giant space of unlimited size.
I was under impression Skynet has taken over and .. .. Of course with branching universes there's nothing weird with us not having seen the T-800.
As for the nukes ..
It would likely be built by the governments.
May be patches to Windows Defender database but not for Windows. I never said I always had to reboot. And I likely exaggerated.
The point was that Windows want me to reboot a lot and without additional hard to reach tweaking it even enforced reboot of its own will.
I don't care about patch Tuesday. I think it's stupid to not send out the updates as soon as possible. If companies don't want them then fine let them handle it. Thought I guess they would suffer from such a solution. Having updates isn't a problem. Windows requiring reboots and worse forcing me to reboot is the problem.
It is a problem for me.
Try to get that out of your tiny (or gapping, what do I know) asshole (maybe it's just too much to try to get into your.. uhm.. ass to understand for you.)
Ohnoz, I'm wasting electricity. Thanks for telling me!
I've done that lots of years. Now I have functional sleep at least so sometimes but not always I use that which is much better than having it on. Hibernate doesn't work so I don't use that.
It is a problem. It may not be for you but it is for me. Get over it.
Windows did require me to restart, the restart after a week/a week + one day(?) was enforced.
http://answers.microsoft.com/e...
http://www.redmondpie.com/how-...
Now shut up stupid. It doesn't matter that your opinion is different. Mine is what it is.
And there we go again, yet another important upgrade now, in this case an update for Windows Defender so that one won't require a reboot AFAIK.
I may not install the upgrades as soon as they become available and hence they may add up before I finally install them so the occasions for them may be more often than on my machine.
But:
http://i58.tinypic.com/28bbqsm...
So clearly there was 10 occasions in December, 6 in January and 5 so far in February for me.
Eat my ass regarding once a month the second Tuesday.
The ones regarding the base OS alone may be less frequent / once a month and maybe one don't have to reboot more often than that. It's not like I sit rebooting more often than I have to.
Uptime is irrelevant for a desktop.
I'm not talking "uptime" as a number. I'm talking having to reboot to get upgrades installed.
Regardless clearly it's not irrelevant for me.
I don't really give much of a shit how you feel it is. That doesn't apply to me. I've got my reasons.
I'm not sure openSUSE tell me to reboot / I don't know how it expresses it.
Though I guess it would be interesting to get to know whatever any of the updates was security related or whatever it's just upgraded software in general.
Also Windows didn't just told you you should reboot or asked you whatever you wanted it.
It enforced the reboot regardless of what you picked.
I understand I need to reboot for the kernel stuff to happen but in Linux I would worry less about being without those upgrades than I would in Windows.
That I have no clue (though I guess there's some way to actually get one) what Windows updated doesn't help either.
But mostly it REALLY wants me to reboot whereas I assume a Linux message about it would be like "You need to reboot to to complete these updates" (for lack of better word / sentence.)
I feel like it's more than that. Mind you in this case it likely had wanted me to reboot for some time because I had some upgrades and when it was back up it kinda asked me to reboot again but I guess that may have been the second Tuesday in the month. As in maybe I rebooted on say Sunday and then again on Wednesday or something such.
As for updates only coming once a month I don't know.
Ubuntu pesters me nearly daily to reboot....
I don't know whatever you run some rolling release / unstable version of it or not.
But my experience would be that kernel upgrades is what requires reboots and even if running openSUSE with updates and pacman repositories enable of course you'll get new kernels but it's not like you have to reboot because of that or that anyone is forcing you.
I don't know what Ubuntu says because I don't use it.
In Windows when you get updates it gives a generic "fixes some problems in product" and nothing more really and then a link you can click which open your web-browser to reach yet another "fixes various problems in .." without really saying what or why you should bother.
So you just have to install the crap and sometimes it ask you to reboot sometimes not.
And I feel like I get updates more often than once a month for my Windows installation.
And if it want to reboot it just say so, not why.
And back when I had just installed it it asked me whatever I wanted to reboot. I didn't, and then it said it would reboot the machine for me regardless in a week. Fuck that.
I got rid of that somehow (both that planned reboot and any such future activities) but it completely suck. Let me decide whatever I want to reboot please. And it's not like the solution for that problem was intuitive.
With Ubuntu I wouldn't feel like I had to reboot. Even if I got kernel upgrades so what? If it's not broken already changes are I wouldn't have to reboot. Whatever things some time in the future would rely on running the latest stuff I don't know. Maybe I would figure out at that time. I don't feel like I'm forced to reboot such a system at least.
And with "no-reboot" patches of the kernel even less so.
Meanwhile Windows still seem to ask you to reboot about once a week (every second week?) to install the updates ..
And watching a game on Youtube gives a very misleading impression of gameplay. In fact, I can't fucking stand watching other people play games - especially the kind of games I like, e.g. adventure, where the whole excitement comes from the challenge,
Try Twitch!
Trying to watch that with Flashblock / FlashControl and so on installed can be a real challenge! ;D
As long as the score focuses on "Should you buy this?" and isn't a weight of various factors which doesn't end up in IS IT GOOD / SHOULD I GET IT?!
I guess they are just fine and helpful.
If it was a board-game the amount of miniatures and artwork on cardboard and so on doesn't really help much if the game is shit.
Yeah, maybe comparing them to Rio is exaggerating but back in the late mp3-/media player days they was up there with Cowon/iAudio, iRiver and Sansa Clip as one of the finest you could get.
And then they decided to make an iPhone clone next.
I assume we're many outside of China who know who they are (and that there phones haven't been as successful, but I assume money and volumes can help with that.)