Then again the economies shouldn't even be allowed to be doing what they have done and are doing currently.
Even with the numbers they give.
So why is it happening really?
Also while Greece definitely shouldn't be lying the rules was already that the banks would had taken the hit but they didn't (or well, by now they have taken part of it.)
If banks got hit hard by Greece lying and stupid ledning to them because they thought government debt was safe they would definitely had learned by now that they shouldn't.
I'm from Sweden and well aware of the idiots who think they have the right to pay when others do pay.
They simply suck.
I wish they all got caught and I wish everyone reported these idiots when they saw them.
I still hate that I didn't when I saw someone jump in the back of the bus once here in Örebro.
(Supposedly the immigrants in an immigrant dence part of the town have been doing this / (possibly threatening / ignoring the bus driver) here too.)
Ass-holes, nothing to brag about. Shouldn't any idiot understand that everyone should contribute to the society to get the benefits out from it?
You're free to believe that the fares should be free but not paying isn't the way to make it so. Do it politically and pay through taxes (most of these idiots are likely youths or leftish individuals who don't work anyway) and also realize that demand on transports would increase if everyone could travel for free.
Yeah I don't either get the people who say K6 to Phenom.
Those where processors with a touch of "unless" and "if" attached to their value and performance.
Athlon-XP and Athlon64 was nice but that's kinda it.
K6 II vs Pentium MMX for gaming and you'd still lose out.
And sure AMD chips had lots of cores later but the performance / core sucked, most games and such wasn't multi-threaded and one very fast core is (imho at least..) nicer to have than multiple slower ones. For whatever reason I haven't really understood some people seem to think lots of threads is good now, maybe it's a latency thing?
I won't bother with checking specific models, you do that if that interest you.
Normally the AMD parts has had slower CPU and better GPU but some/one(?) of the very latest Intel processors with integrated GPU seemed to be about equivalent with the best AMD offerings also on the graphics side.
I don't remember what it was called but it may have been within the latest 47xx/48xx series or something such and as such maybe in a different price range than what you're talking about.
I would only be watching the A10 7850 or those Intel chips with similar performance but it's still not very competitive with a "medium enthusiast" graphics card so I would likely not settle for either. But that's me.
"I just don't want to have to kill my browser every day to free up resources":D
(Then again older machine but I can't consider an Intel mini-ITX system today because 16 GB of RAM simply is waaaay too little RAM. And that's kinda always been the case. More RAM is better =P)
What I've read is that the AMD64 stuff is actually good. Personally I don't have an opinion since I'm not educated and experienced enough to have one really.
Motorola 68000-series isn't PowerPC. Their PowerPC chips are called PowerPC 74x, 75x, 74xx and 86xx.... and I assume you're wrong there before a friend of mine back in the days was a demo coder on the Amiga 500 and later got a i386 and afaik he thought it was better (why else would he had switched?) Then again he never experienced the M68040 or M68060 (or the 020 or 030 I guess) and there was improvements like MMU, floating point units, I guess possibly more registers in those.
Apple used both M68k, PowerPC both from Motorola and IBM and Intel x86 and whatever Intel calls AMD64. I guess Apple business was the major player of higher end PowerPC chips and as such they had to fund a large part of the research and manufacturing whereas they didn't had to do that with Intel chips. The 32-bit chips was pretty lame but I guess they knew Intel had 64-bit chips coming soon and that they would be very competitive vs what they could get from IBM.
Or credit mean the currency not the loan?
In that it's too easy for Germans to pay back because the southern Europe countries make the currency weaker?
Why was the credit cheaper with a bunch of shit countries you mean?
Isn't the problem rather than GREEK people have been able to do the same even though the credit shouldn't had been as low?
And that the price level there is 50% higher than in Turkey even though it likely shouldn't be.
If you dropped the salaries of the people in Greece by 1/3 maybe they would had been more competitive?
Isn't the problem that the Greek people have been able to live as Germans even though they aren't?
Yeah it was stupid to borrow all that money.
Then again the economies shouldn't even be allowed to be doing what they have done and are doing currently.
Even with the numbers they give.
So why is it happening really?
Also while Greece definitely shouldn't be lying the rules was already that the banks would had taken the hit but they didn't (or well, by now they have taken part of it.)
If banks got hit hard by Greece lying and stupid ledning to them because they thought government debt was safe they would definitely had learned by now that they shouldn't.
Yeah, and how lying countries/countries which doesn't measure up has been let in too.
It's a little weird how the EU and Euro have these laws which the nations threat as optionals anyway.
In Norway the police doesn't even carry a gun unless they have gotten permission from above.
But since pounds is only used in the brittish empire and because that have become so small by now does it really matter any more? ;D
Everywhere it matters we'd use newton and kilograms anyway.
Just limit the usage of pounds into the queens closet already.
I obviously meant right not to pay :)
I was very tired yesterday so I apologize for any other mistakes made as well :)
Thiefs think others should pay, news at 11.
I'm from Sweden and well aware of the idiots who think they have the right to pay when others do pay.
They simply suck.
I wish they all got caught and I wish everyone reported these idiots when they saw them.
I still hate that I didn't when I saw someone jump in the back of the bus once here in Örebro.
(Supposedly the immigrants in an immigrant dence part of the town have been doing this / (possibly threatening / ignoring the bus driver) here too.)
Ass-holes, nothing to brag about. Shouldn't any idiot understand that everyone should contribute to the society to get the benefits out from it?
You're free to believe that the fares should be free but not paying isn't the way to make it so. Do it politically and pay through taxes (most of these idiots are likely youths or leftish individuals who don't work anyway) and also realize that demand on transports would increase if everyone could travel for free.
What about all the indie bundles / small games?
Surely you can find a shitload of platformers, shoot 'em ups, puzzle games, physics games, space development games and so on to fill your time with?
He exageratted.
But over in Nintendo camp supposedly it's bye bye for all online multiplayer gaming for the Wii and DS now.
(Well, that have happened on PC too, but it's still due to vendor lock-in at least :))
Seem to me like there's some pretty good advantage in doing games for x86 and Windows .. (but maybe not as strong if you optimise at this level.)
Regardless they have made 64 bit PowerPC processors which was the point.
Yeah I don't either get the people who say K6 to Phenom.
Those where processors with a touch of "unless" and "if" attached to their value and performance.
Athlon-XP and Athlon64 was nice but that's kinda it.
K6 II vs Pentium MMX for gaming and you'd still lose out.
And sure AMD chips had lots of cores later but the performance / core sucked, most games and such wasn't multi-threaded and one very fast core is (imho at least..) nicer to have than multiple slower ones. For whatever reason I haven't really understood some people seem to think lots of threads is good now, maybe it's a latency thing?
I won't bother with checking specific models, you do that if that interest you.
Normally the AMD parts has had slower CPU and better GPU but some/one(?) of the very latest Intel processors with integrated GPU seemed to be about equivalent with the best AMD offerings also on the graphics side.
I don't remember what it was called but it may have been within the latest 47xx/48xx series or something such and as such maybe in a different price range than what you're talking about.
I would only be watching the A10 7850 or those Intel chips with similar performance but it's still not very competitive with a "medium enthusiast" graphics card so I would likely not settle for either. But that's me.
When you say a 32-bit CPU what do you mean really? The Intel one or the Motorola one?
From what you're saying afterwards it sound like the m68k was ok on more expensive stuff but not on PC because it was cheaper?
But lots of designed for home gear like the Mega Drive, Atari and Amiga home computers and so on used the m68k.
"I just don't want to have to kill my browser every day to free up resources" :D
(Then again older machine but I can't consider an Intel mini-ITX system today because 16 GB of RAM simply is waaaay too little RAM. And that's kinda always been the case. More RAM is better =P)
Bullshit.
You're one of those who would be happy with horses back in the day. Or the cave. Or whatever.
Also thank Microsoft for the useless monitor resolutions I guess.
s/before/because/g :)
What I've read is that the AMD64 stuff is actually good. Personally I don't have an opinion since I'm not educated and experienced enough to have one really.
Motorola 68000-series isn't PowerPC. Their PowerPC chips are called PowerPC 74x, 75x, 74xx and 86xx. ... and I assume you're wrong there before a friend of mine back in the days was a demo coder on the Amiga 500 and later got a i386 and afaik he thought it was better (why else would he had switched?) Then again he never experienced the M68040 or M68060 (or the 020 or 030 I guess) and there was improvements like MMU, floating point units, I guess possibly more registers in those.
Apple used both M68k, PowerPC both from Motorola and IBM and Intel x86 and whatever Intel calls AMD64. I guess Apple business was the major player of higher end PowerPC chips and as such they had to fund a large part of the research and manufacturing whereas they didn't had to do that with Intel chips. The 32-bit chips was pretty lame but I guess they knew Intel had 64-bit chips coming soon and that they would be very competitive vs what they could get from IBM.
IBM did Power and PowerPC (IBM PowerPC 970 is the "G5" in Apple products.)
Yeah. This year you can get the PSU. .. :)
Too bad I didn't bought into this dogcrap before though if they are going to get this serious and raise public awareness.
Man do I have the perfect currency name (that's all it's about right? :D)
Waterworld is a cool movie.
I want a ship of his style.