All kings is mostly rapscallions. -Mark Twain, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
Wasn't Twain, was Huck Finn, in the book by Mark Twain. There is a difference.
So you believe that everyone who lives in a state that isn't communist is just going to spontaneously give up everything they own ? Of their own free will ? At the same time ? To the state ? To begin a communist state ? There is a reason every communist state so far has been totalitarian. The have to seize power with bloody hands. There simply is no other way to do it. You can say "the proletariat really owns everything" so you are not stealing anything. At that point you are no different than Stalin. Don't you believe in individual rights ? Or only group rights ? "of the proletariat" ? You can't seize the property of all of society without doing violence to the people (individuals ) who own the property you are taking from them. There is a reason every communist state has been totalitarian. They have to be, or they couldn't be communist. Figure it out. Stalin and Lenin depend on people like you. You are naive, and unwilling to think.
She doesn't get upset about the murder. She's angry that they are dissing women, or people of color, or people from someplace else. Dissing. Instead of making a fuss about why women are paid less for the same work, or using the bully pulpit she has as a high profile politician to agitate for more money for higher education for women or minorities, she's up there bitching about women being "dissed". Make a fuss about something that matters, rather than imaginary people being "dissed". If liberals stopped bitching about "respect", "dissing", or some moron calling someone a bad name they might get something done. Ohhhhh, but if they ever do get anything meaningful done, most of the people they help will become republicans. So they can't really help people, they have bitch about imaginary women being "dissed".
All communists must be murderers and thieves by definition. They have to seize the resources of society, owned by others. They have to steal, and when the people they are stealing from take action to protect their interests, the communists must kill them or exile them. You can't have communism without murder and theft.
Have a blast in any society kicked started by men brutal enough to murder enough people to scare the rest into not defending their property when it is out and out stolen from them, under threat of death. That defines every version of communism.
Wake up. Marx had to pawn his shoes on a regular basis. Simply taking the resources of others and having the state support you must have looked like a pretty good deal to a guy who couldn't afford to hold on to his own shoes for long.
A possible solution might be to store a software "key" on a usb thumb drive for each site, yahoo, msn, your bank, and so on, that would also require a password. That "key" would function like the bank card, and would need to be stored on a removable drive. So you would need both. Don't know how you'd get around it if lost your thumb drive though.....
Any idea's ?
Why would M$ care ? And why the hell is my karma b
on
Firefox In Print
·
· Score: 0
I don't understand why M$ would care about a browser war for a browser they give away ? Can they make money with IE ? How ? And why the hell is my karma bad ? Just noticed that.
This isn't a law designed to protect consumers. They are going to use it only a few times to beat up on a few companys, to try to intimidate the majority of others, for a brief political gain. Then it'll just fade away.
I did read the F**king article, then went to their site. 200 bucks for something you can get 99% of free ? Who would do that ? Not me, and I've bought two versions of Mandrake and one of SUSE. They are not in their right minds. 2 cents less than 200 ? What are they thinking ? 199.99 might be too much ?
Re:But is it available in Rural America?
on
The Other VoIP
·
· Score: 1
all you need is broadband man, so it's everywhere, even sw virgina
Where is the BBC story about how RIAA is dangerous and obviously behind this "new" attack ? The mainstream media is a joke, they mostly just repeat each other, except when the BBC gets creative. Don't know if I should approve or not, but it does spice things up a little when they out and out make stuff up.
Buddhism is NOT one of the 3 mentioned. They were referring to Judaism, they call Islam, Christianity and Judaism religions "of the book", referring to the old Testament of the bible, which all 3 use in some form or another. They don't think much of Buddha buddy.
Slashdot Mirror
All kings is mostly rapscallions. -Mark Twain, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn Wasn't Twain, was Huck Finn, in the book by Mark Twain. There is a difference.
So you believe that everyone who lives in a state that isn't communist is just going to spontaneously give up everything they own ? Of their own free will ? At the same time ? To the state ? To begin a communist state ? There is a reason every communist state so far has been totalitarian. The have to seize power with bloody hands. There simply is no other way to do it. You can say "the proletariat really owns everything" so you are not stealing anything. At that point you are no different than Stalin. Don't you believe in individual rights ? Or only group rights ? "of the proletariat" ? You can't seize the property of all of society without doing violence to the people (individuals ) who own the property you are taking from them. There is a reason every communist state has been totalitarian. They have to be, or they couldn't be communist. Figure it out. Stalin and Lenin depend on people like you. You are naive, and unwilling to think.
She doesn't get upset about the murder. She's angry that they are dissing women, or people of color, or people from someplace else. Dissing. Instead of making a fuss about why women are paid less for the same work, or using the bully pulpit she has as a high profile politician to agitate for more money for higher education for women or minorities, she's up there bitching about women being "dissed". Make a fuss about something that matters, rather than imaginary people being "dissed". If liberals stopped bitching about "respect", "dissing", or some moron calling someone a bad name they might get something done. Ohhhhh, but if they ever do get anything meaningful done, most of the people they help will become republicans. So they can't really help people, they have bitch about imaginary women being "dissed".
All communists must be murderers and thieves by definition. They have to seize the resources of society, owned by others. They have to steal, and when the people they are stealing from take action to protect their interests, the communists must kill them or exile them. You can't have communism without murder and theft. Have a blast in any society kicked started by men brutal enough to murder enough people to scare the rest into not defending their property when it is out and out stolen from them, under threat of death. That defines every version of communism. Wake up. Marx had to pawn his shoes on a regular basis. Simply taking the resources of others and having the state support you must have looked like a pretty good deal to a guy who couldn't afford to hold on to his own shoes for long.
DNS went out on my cable conection, but the vonage phone worked fine, tried a dial up account I use on the road, wouldn't work. :(
A possible solution might be to store a software "key" on a usb thumb drive for each site, yahoo, msn, your bank, and so on, that would also require a password. That "key" would function like the bank card, and would need to be stored on a removable drive. So you would need both. Don't know how you'd get around it if lost your thumb drive though..... Any idea's ?
I don't understand why M$ would care about a browser war for a browser they give away ? Can they make money with IE ? How ? And why the hell is my karma bad ? Just noticed that.
Does M$ make any money off of a browser they give away ? If they don't make any money off it, why would they care about this or firefox ?
Been surfing enough porn to come up with his own solution to this mighty problem. :)
This isn't a law designed to protect consumers. They are going to use it only a few times to beat up on a few companys, to try to intimidate the majority of others, for a brief political gain. Then it'll just fade away.
Front page of their web site, didn't see any price info in the article. :( upps...thanks...might try them now :)
I did read the F**king article, then went to their site. 200 bucks for something you can get 99% of free ? Who would do that ? Not me, and I've bought two versions of Mandrake and one of SUSE. They are not in their right minds. 2 cents less than 200 ? What are they thinking ? 199.99 might be too much ?
all you need is broadband man, so it's everywhere, even sw virgina
Packet8 gets massive free advertising, and the site is "down for maintenance". Did they get /.ed ? Or is this just a biz blunder ?
How much has the UK goverment recieved from m$, after all, isn't m$ indemified ?
Where is the BBC story about how RIAA is dangerous and obviously behind this "new" attack ? The mainstream media is a joke, they mostly just repeat each other, except when the BBC gets creative. Don't know if I should approve or not, but it does spice things up a little when they out and out make stuff up.
Buddhism is NOT one of the 3 mentioned. They were referring to Judaism, they call Islam, Christianity and Judaism religions "of the book", referring to the old Testament of the bible, which all 3 use in some form or another. They don't think much of Buddha buddy.