Slashdot Mirror


Always-On Internet For Cheapskates?

chuck writes "I like my broadband Internet access because of its always-on nature, but my usage doesn't really justify paying $40-$50 each month for hundreds of kb/s when all I really do is read and write email sporadically, light web browsing and IM. Are there any options for cheapskates like me to pay less for lower bandwidth (modem speeds would be fine) but still have an always-on connection for cheaper than cable or DSL? I have a $5/mo ISP that I use when I'm out and about, and my 2.5G wireless phone can give me internet access on a shoestring (with free evenings and weekends) but neither of those has that always-on quality. Any ideas?"

465 comments

  1. The cheapest solution... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Piggyback on your neighbor's unsecured WAP. :-)

    1. Re:The cheapest solution... by TrippTDF · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hey, not such a bad idea. Here in New York I've set up Wi-Fi enabled laptops for friends and just had them piggy back on an open network... Just about anywhere you go in New York you can pick up at least a couple open networks (I once saw 20 at once). A friend of mine actually put a Wi-Fi card in his desktop and canceled his cable modem, and now he just piggy-backs off someone in his building.

      Better yet, move to someplace like Philly that is going to have free Wi-FI city wide soon.

    2. Re:The cheapest solution... by sharkey · · Score: 0

      Ummm, he already said that his mobile phone does not do what he wants. WAP is neat, but in this case, it doesn't do what he's looking for.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:The cheapest solution... by hAkron · · Score: 1

      I don't think that he was speaking about WAP as in Wireless Application Protocol from a CellPhone. He was speaking about WAP as in Wireless Access Point. Unsecured 802.11 wireless.

    4. Re:The cheapest solution... by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 1

      What does piggybacking on someone's WAP have to do with his mobile phone? He is saying the guy should get a wireless card and use his neighbor's internet access.

    5. Re:The cheapest solution... by zarozarozaro · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or better yet, work out something where you split the cost/month, and piggyback with some security.

    6. Re:The cheapest solution... by fm6 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That answers the requirement for low cost and instant-on. But not the requirement for low speed...

    7. Re:The cheapest solution... by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      "I didnt know what this meant, so I looked it up in wikipedia and found an unrelated acronym which didnt seem to make sense based on the context of the original post so rather than looking it up on google I assumed that the original post didnt know what it was talking about"

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    8. Re:The cheapest solution... by germanStefan · · Score: 2

      I strung a cable between my house and my neighbors house. He paid half of the bill. If you do that with one or two neighbors, its not really that unethical (all though it is illegal), but I don't see the huge problem with sharing it with one or two people. Most people don't need all the bandwidth they get with cable so distributing makes sense. If you want to be legal, purchase the Pro package from the cable company, then you can share it with as many people as your want...

    9. Re:The cheapest solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thief! Do you want to burn just for internet?

    10. Re:The cheapest solution... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I dunno if it's illegal exactly ... ISPs aren't part of law enforcement (yet.) But I'm sure it's against the TOS of most providers.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    11. Re:The cheapest solution... by tibike77 · · Score: 1

      I assume you mean the cable between your homes when you say "illegal"... not the connection sharing... right ?

      Hmm, I'm from Romania... people here use this kind of solution not now-and-then, but usually. I doubt more than one half of the people that have internet access at home (but I'd bet less than one tenth of the people that know any differences between IRC and mIRC) have it "only for themselves".

      In my particular case, I have a cable modem hooked up to a Fedora Core 2 mini-server for our 4-computer-household. If I can legally do that in my own home (and I guess it would be pretty weird if I couldn't), what's stopping me from sharing the same line with one or two neighbours if I would be living alone (instead of with others) ?

      --
      By reading this signature you agree to not disagree with the post you just read.
    12. Re:The cheapest solution... by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just use Internet Explorer on top of it. That should make it the hat trick!

      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
    13. Re:The cheapest solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just install some spywares. That'd do the trick. :P

    14. Re:The cheapest solution... by fm6 · · Score: 1

      That won't work by itself. You need to browse a few porn sites to pick up some drive-by spyware infestations. Problem solved!

    15. Re:The cheapest solution... by jc42 · · Score: 5, Informative

      See if speakeasy has service in your area. They encourage sharing of connections, especially with wifi. They will help you set up line sharing with neighbors (or tell you if you have a neighbor that's already doing this). They'll help you set it up and take care of the billing for you. Depending on the actual speed you need, you could share one DSL line among N people, and each would pay 1/N of the monthly bill. It would all be open and legal.

      They also don't block any ports, so you could run an email server on your own machine if you like. For that matter, you could run your own web server, making it easy to share your pictures with friends. I've done a lot of this, just sending a URL so they can browse the thumbnails and download any pics they like.

      Are there other ISPs that encourage this? You'd think they all would, if they were actually interested in giving good service to their customers.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    16. Re:The cheapest solution... by Brian+Brian · · Score: 1

      Yep, piggybacking is a good idea. Even in residential neighborhoods. If you have a hip neighbor it is easy and cheap to share a connection amoung many houses. Although I wonder if the cable companies are smart enough to catch on. The down side is if one nieghbor has a teen who is on 24/7 then you are SOL - but then maybe you can get tons of music for free! (Shame on me. I didn't say that)

    17. Re:The cheapest solution... by nametaken · · Score: 1


      Mod parent up, this is the first smart answer I've heard.

      People really shouldn't be jumping on open AP's just because they're open and you're broke. There are several reasons why that's not a good idea.

    18. Re:The cheapest solution... by LinuxHam · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I once saw 20 [networks] at once [in New York]

      My record for a single sitting on the 38th floor of the Hilton in midtown is **247** networks. Not all open, sure, but still... ;)

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    19. Re:The cheapest solution... by Grax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      (IANAL)
      I would presume it is prosecutable under the same laws they would use against cable signal theft.

      Under those laws they only need to show that you are wired up in such a way to enable "signal theft" and then it is up to you to prove that you were not "stealing" their signal.

    20. Re:The cheapest solution... by PKPerson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My uncle anc cousins have an interesting setup. They pay their neighbors about $10 a month and their neighbors supply them with a wireless key. They bought a kick-ass directional antenna and pointed it at their neighbor's house. Its not technically piggybacking, buy I dont know what the IPS's polocy is on sharing internet.

    21. Re:The cheapest solution... by temojen · · Score: 4, Funny

      I believe the name for this service is "IP freely"

    22. Re:The cheapest solution... by LinuxGeek · · Score: 1

      Dang, with that many APs spread over just 11 ( mostly overlapping) channels, the throughput must be really slow. Did you connect to any and see how usable they were? 247 visible connections just boggles my mind.

      --

      Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
    23. Re:The cheapest solution... by Fjornir · · Score: 1

      I call bullshit. He might have seen 247 nodes, but never 247 networks.

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    24. Re:The cheapest solution... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Informative
      If I can legally do that in my own home (and I guess it would be pretty weird if I couldn't), what's stopping me from sharing the same line with one or two neighbours if I would be living alone (instead of with others) ?

      In the US, residential service is supposed to be for one residence. A lot of people do it (I did the same 25 years ago with cable TV, and am about to do it with my current connection), but that doesn't mean the provider has to like it or authorize it. Who does the neighbor call for a service issue? You, or the cable company?

      From the TimeWarner RoadRunner service Acceptable Use Policy:
      "...the RoadRunner service is provided to you for personal, non-commercial use only."

      From the TimeWarner RoadRunner Cable Modem Service Subscription Agreement
      "5. Subscriber Conduct.(d)
      Subscriber will not resell the Road Runner Service, or any portion thereof, or otherwise charge others to use the Road Runner Service, or any portion thereof. Further, Subscriber will not redistribute the Road Runner Service, or any portion thereof, whether or not Subscriber receives compensation for such redistribution. The Road Runner Service as offered under this Agreement is a residential service offered for personal, non-commercial use only."

      Each house/apt/condo is supposed to pay for their own connection.

    25. Re:The cheapest solution... by SpookyFish · · Score: 2


      I have cable and am fine with paying for it, but I did this for the first few weeks after I moved into this condo, before comcast got around to activating my taps.

      There were 8 unsecured points with reasonble signal strength.. it's made me wonder how much effort it would be to bond several wap connections together for higher bandwidth, especially considering how cheap the hardware has become.

      Would be an interesting model for apartment / condo communities - since not everyone will be using the net at the same time, join in and add your bandwidth to the 'community pool' - most of the time everyone would get better speeds.

    26. Re:The cheapest solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Take that fucking wire down before you blow out your gear, his gear, and start a fire in one or both houses. That is so fucking stupid I can't even begin to express myself. Check this out, bitch: never ever use ethernet on two systems that don't share a common ground. FUCK, did you ever think there was a REASON why electricians need to be LICENSED?

    27. Re:The cheapest solution... by bigman2003 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I work on a fairly large campus, with wireless access in a lot of places.

      When I am there, I turn on my Pocket PC just to see who is accessing the network at the time.

      It usually looks like this:

      Jenny Chu
      M. Choi
      Lynn Park
      Yokomoto Comp
      Sun Yee
      MaXHaXoR
      Martin Wong

      Gee...I wonder who that nerdy looking white guy over in the corner is...

      --
      No reason to lie.
    28. Re:The cheapest solution... by stevejsmith · · Score: 1

      Cand am locuit in Bucuresti (pe Bulevardul Aviatorilor, unde au fost multi romani si straini bogati), n-am putut sa gasesc nicio retea si nimeni care a avut un wireless network liber. (Da, stiu, romana mea e groznic.)

    29. Re:The cheapest solution... by Dwonis · · Score: 1
      Isn't ethernet magnetically coupled?

      On the other hand, lightning may have a tendency to hit improperly-installed copper...

    30. Re:The cheapest solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank $Diety for wireless!!

    31. Re:The cheapest solution... by Doug+Neal · · Score: 4, Informative

      Depending on how good your card is and how far away you are you usually pick up far more networks than you can connect to - the AP's signal is strong enough to pick up but the card isn't always transmitting at high enough power for the signal to get back to the AP.

    32. Re:The cheapest solution... by tylernt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's why you purchase a business grade account that does not have the AUP restricitons of the residential account. If necessary, form a corporation (takes two people, $50, and a trip to City Hall) and have your neighbors become members of your corp. You're no longer sharing internet access with a third party because you're all in the same corporation, thus, no AUP violation.

      This is assuming you purchase the internet account in the name of the corp, not your own name, of course.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    33. Re:The cheapest solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It took over an hour to log all of them, and it was 11:00 at night. So you can't really expect all of them to be that busy. They were just "reachable". During the day I'm sure its nutsy, but at night I've connected no problem.

    34. Re:The cheapest solution... by kernelistic · · Score: 1

      1. Dig a 1-meter deep trench.
      2. Install the Cat 5e.
      3. ???
      4. Profit!

    35. Re:The cheapest solution... by Siniset · · Score: 1

      umm... did you not read the post? "Whether or not you recieve compensation." That means it doesn't matter if you get paid or not. -siniset

    36. Re:The cheapest solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call bullshit. He might have seen 247 nodes, but never 247 networks

      Ok I'll give you that. No, not every single AP served its own independent network. Hell there were 5 or 6 from Verizon's free WiFi phone booths. But there still were a massive number of networks available. Have you ever *been* to midtown Manhattan (53rd & 6th Ave)? At least 20 or 30 stories up? It is INSANE.. with the number of offices and hotel rooms visible from mine, I could pay the mortgage with a website fed by my digital binoculars ;)

      So, okay, the most **nodes** I've ever detected in a single NetStumbler session was 247. Check out wigle.net and drill down to New York City sometime (when it comes back up). Now look for the actual streets :)

    37. Re:The cheapest solution... by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I dunno if it's illegal exactly ... ISPs aren't part of law enforcement (yet.) But I'm sure it's against the TOS of most providers.

      That is a good question whether it would fall in the same catagory as theft of service. If we're talking cableTV, and you run a cable from your house to another it would be considered theft of service.

      Key difference with WiFi is you are not actually running a physical wire, and WiFi is often offered directly from the ISP. Having one in it self isn't illegal like running a rogue wire. You can't see it, or photograph it. I have yet to see a case where someone gets taken to court over sharing beyond their property.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    38. Re:The cheapest solution... by Sanctuary · · Score: 1

      Speakeasy will even bill your neighbors for you.
      http://www.speakeasy.net/netshare/

    39. Re:The cheapest solution... by izomiac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At my old high school we probably had 50 people sharing their music collections (it was a boarding school). I hardly ever needed to open Napster (this was ~5 years ago), because someone had already downloaded whatever I was interested in. Of course, some people put passwords on their shared folders, but it wasn't anything pqwak couldn't take care of.

    40. Re:The cheapest solution... by jackb_guppy · · Score: 1

      Is there a method to get speakeasy when you are 40ft to far from the CO?

    41. Re:The cheapest solution... by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Swap houses with your neighbors? ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    42. Re:The cheapest solution... by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      That is so fucking stupid I can't even begin to express myself....did you ever think there was a REASON why electricians need to be LICENSED?

      Well make up your mind. Which is it? Is it so obvious that he's "fucking stupid" to not know better, or is it so complex that one needs licensed training to know better?

    43. Re:The cheapest solution... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I have to laugh my ass off at the moderation of this post: How in the world can the very first post in a topic be redundant??? Get a clue, moderator!

    44. Re:The cheapest solution... by WeblionX · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pringles can?

      --
      (\(\
      (=_=) Bani!
      (")")
    45. Re:The cheapest solution... by Dausha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ". . . its (sic) not really that unethical (although it is illegal) . . ."

      Yes, it is quite illegal. Most states call it the "Theft of Cable" act, or more recently, "Theft of Information Services." In my state, it's a felony that can get you up to five years on the first offense.

      But, more importantly, you are saying that theft is "not that unethical." Or, to put it another way, "theft is ethical." Okay, so when somebody steals your car you won't press charges because it's ethical?

      What's that? Not the same thing? I disagree. First of all, both cases of theft are statutorially illegal. Second, you paid for your car (probably still are like most of us), so you should get to decide who uses it. The Cable Companies paid for the infrastructure. Don't they have the right to determine who can use it?

      Or, another example? Rental cars. A big company loans you their car. They paid for the car, you can only use it within the limitations of the contract you sign as a renter.

      So, while it may seem cheaper to steal cable . . .

      --
      What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
    46. Re:The cheapest solution... by tibike77 · · Score: 1

      I was talking about a "LAN" between a couple of houses (good old UTP, a cheap mini-switch, that sort of thing) using an "always on" connection (usually 256kbps cable modem now).
      Heh, you'll have trouble finding any wireless access points even nowadays in Romania... when did you live in Bucharest anyway ?

      And what does "personal use" mean ? Only the owner of the contract can use a single PC (and not his spouse, kids, friends) ? That sounds pretty unenforceable to me, from a punitive financial standpoint.
      What can companies do if you actually "breach" the TOS and share your connection ? Cancel your subscription/service ?

      --
      By reading this signature you agree to not disagree with the post you just read.
    47. Re:The cheapest solution... by tibike77 · · Score: 1

      He was referring to a voluntary internet connection sharing for the sole purpose of cutting down costs when he said "not really that unethical"... he wasn't talking about piggybacking on an unsecured WAP.

      --
      By reading this signature you agree to not disagree with the post you just read.
    48. Re:The cheapest solution... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Better than swap houses with your neighbor, get your neighbor to sign up and then share with them. If they don't wanta sign up just offer to cover 100% of the cost then share with others in the neighborhood.

    49. Re:The cheapest solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny


      Jenny Chu
      M. Choi
      Lynn Park
      Yokomoto Comp
      Sun Yee
      MaXHaXoR
      Martin Wong

      Gee...I wonder who that nerdy looking white guy over in the corner is...


      Woody Allen?

    50. Re:The cheapest solution... by l3prador · · Score: 1

      Another key difference between cable TV and WiFi is that sharing it detracts from what you have... Your bandwidth will go down while they are using it, whereas with cable TV, you lose virtually nothing by sharing it (except that there may be a slight signal strength loss).

    51. Re:The cheapest solution... by jrockway · · Score: 1

      I was too far away to get ADSL from them, but SDSL has longer range and they could give it to me. (By the time I found out, though, I had already gotten a connection from a local wireless ISP.)

      --
      My other car is first.
    52. Re:The cheapest solution... by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      The word that applies here is "unlawful", generally used to refer to activities which are violations of civil (rather than criminal) law.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    53. Re:The cheapest solution... by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      You mean some people charge you to P?

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    54. Re:The cheapest solution... by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      That's exactly how I'm posting this right now. Why should I pay for broadband, when my neighbor can pay for it for me?

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    55. Re:The cheapest solution... by Cramer · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you live, but forming a corporation is alot more involved (and expensive) than a simple 50$ and signing some papers at City Hall. And there are requirements well beyond simply registering the corp.

    56. Re:The cheapest solution... by Etyenne · · Score: 1

      That is why you need a Senao 2511 or a SMC EliteConnect Wifi adapter. At 200 mW, your signal will actually be *stronger* than the AP.

      --
      :wq
    57. Re:The cheapest solution... by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Run it to your neighbor's house and share it over wifi.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    58. Re:The cheapest solution... by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They also don't block any ports, so you could run an email server on your own machine if you like.

      Does speakeasy give a static ip or lease them out via dhcp?

      A *lot* of mail servers reject mail sent from dynamic hosts.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    59. Re:The cheapest solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, that's irrelevant because he is taking issue with theft of service from the isp not one's neighbors.
      But really, calm down, GP. The theft of a car, even if returned is significantly different from sharing an internet connection with one's neighbors. Yes they may both have the same binary legal status, but the world of ethics is not so simple. I don't think it's unethical to share with your neighbor, i think it's smart. Most people pay for more than what they need in broadband, really only needing the throughput for a few seconds when browsing pages, and the mentioned always-on convenience. Normal subscribers are subsidizing for those who may use the whole connection downloading stuff, etc. So why is it so wrong to share out the internet connection, reducing the cost to a more fair level?
      because i say so, biatch.

    60. Re:The cheapest solution... by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      that, and you're paying for business service.

      Comparison:
      Business DSL from XO (Formerly concentric) used to cost ~200/mo for 192 up/down. (we had hosting services bundled with that)

      Since it was a "home office" and we never took advantage of the "Business perks", canceled the dsl and went residential cable internet. 3 meg down, 256 meg up for 50/mo. add 50/mo for hosting and volia!

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    61. Re:The cheapest solution... by compjinx · · Score: 5, Funny

      They invented a new technology to combat clogged up wi-fi networks; they are called CAT5 cables. You can plug them between your cable modem and your computer and have up to 1Gbps all to yourself!

      --
      I will not lower myself to using a lame-joke sig... dangit!
    62. Re:The cheapest solution... by E_elven · · Score: 1

      Pun. Sorry.

      --
      Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
    63. Re:The cheapest solution... by eric76 · · Score: 2, Informative
      That is a good question whether it would fall in the same catagory as theft of service.

      Not in Texas. Or, to be more accurate, after reviewing the law on theft of service, it is very unlikely that it could be classified as that.

      From the Texas Penal Code:

      31.04. THEFT OF SERVICE.

      (a) A person commits theft of service if, with intent to avoid payment for service that he knows is provided only for compensation:

      (1) he intentionally or knowingly secures performance of the service by deception, threat, or false token;

      (2) having control over the disposition of services of another to which he is not entitled, he intentionally or knowingly diverts the other's services to his own benefit or to the benefit of another not entitled to them;

      (3) having control of personal property under a written rental agreement, he holds the property beyond the expiration of the rental period without the effective consent of the owner of the property, thereby depriving the owner of the property of its use in further rentals; or

      (4) he intentionally or knowingly secures the performance of the service by agreeing to provide compensation and, after the service is rendered, fails to make payment after receiving notice demanding payment.

      First of all, (3) and (4) wouldn't normally apply. However, if you agreed to pay the neighbor half the bill and then didn't, you could be found guilty for that. But that would be theft of service from the neighbor, not his ISP.

      If you broke your neighbor's wep and then used his network you would have committed theft of service. Similary, you would also be guilty of theft of service if you reconfigured his access point to enable yourself to connect as well.

      But I can't see that it would be theft of service if your neighbor gave you permission to connect to the internet through his access point.

      I'm not a lawyer, so my interpreation could be wrong. And, of course, other states may differ.

    64. Re:The cheapest solution... by shadowzero313 · · Score: 0, Informative

      cat 5 is only good for up to 16 or 20 Mbps. cat 5e is good up to 100 Mbps, you need cat 6 (and suitable equipment) to run at gigabit speeds.

    65. Re:The cheapest solution... by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      He didn't say it was copper, did he?

      Fiber is safe enough, as long as there isn't any metal insulation around it (dunno why there would be, but apparently it happens).

    66. Re:The cheapest solution... by dev!null!4d · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      ~www.devnull.co.uk
    67. Re:The cheapest solution... by uglyduckling · · Score: 1
      I don't know about US law, but here's what I did in the UK. 50 of us living in a student hall, the only comms are a couple of payphones. I thought - it's OK for a business to share an internet connection with however many employees, and there's nothing stopping a business using a residential service - you just don't get such a good service level agreement. So I set up a 'computer society' of which we all became mutual members, with a society bank account. That society ran a wireless network sharing 500kb and later 1mb of broadband.

      I can't see any reason why you can't form a 'society' with your neighbours, open a society bank account, and lease broadband in the society's name. When other people in your street get interested, let them join too. One word of advice: be very clear about what you are offering - I ended up giving a lot of free tech support before putting my foot down and explaining that getting the connection working at the users' end was their deal.

    68. Re:The cheapest solution... by Omicron · · Score: 1

      I currently have runs of CAT5 @ 100 and CAT5e @ 1GB...

    69. Re:The cheapest solution... by danheskett · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, speakeasy gives static ips by request, and they'll even set your reverse dns name however you want.

    70. Re:The cheapest solution... by sjalex · · Score: 1

      Well, anyone can buy commercial service, corporation or not. The problem is you pay twice as much for the same service.

    71. Re:The cheapest solution... by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

      That is why you need a Senao 2511 or a SMC EliteConnect Wifi adapter. At 200 mW, your signal will actually be *stronger* than the AP.

      And as a ham radio operator, I'm licensed for 1500 **watts**. Check out HSMM sometime. Hams realized one day that they can operate under amateur radio rules part 97 instead of unlicensed part 15 rules.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    72. Re:The cheapest solution... by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      On their website, it looks like you have to buy a higher-end service to get the static ip. They also give you stuff you don't need like web hosting and e-maill addresses.

      Are you saying they'd negotiate?

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    73. Re:The cheapest solution... by Etyenne · · Score: 1

      Except that you can't use encryption on your link. Bye bye WEP, WPA, ssh, SSL, PGP etc. I am not even sure you could use simple challenge-based authentication scheme such as APOP. Between broadcasting my passwords for anybody to fetch with 20$ worth of equipement or restricting myself to 4 watts EIRP, the choice is an easy one.

      73 de VA2***

      (sorry for the incomplete callsign, I very much value my privacy on this board)

      --
      :wq
    74. Re:The cheapest solution... by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

      While you're absolutely right about the encryption, check this out. And believe you me, you won't find my call here either :)

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    75. Re:The cheapest solution... by Dausha · · Score: 1

      Except, the Terms of Service of the typical ISP forbids sharing the connection between residences. That's why I'm waiting for Speakeasy to show up in my area. Violation of the Terms of services is at least a breach of contract, and could be illegal in some jurisdictions (such as mine).

      --
      What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
    76. Re:The cheapest solution... by stevejsmith · · Score: 1

      I still live in Bucharest, just not anywhere you'd find open access points (I live in Baneasa). As for the legal specification, you must be talking about the US, because in Romania...well...I'd expect bars to start carding minors (ha!) before I see actual strict enforcement of ISP contracts. :-P

    77. Re:The cheapest solution... by StormKrow · · Score: 1

      That's why cable ISP's started limiting bandwidth and making it an async connection (downstream bigger than the upstream)... Some jackass many moons ago, took his cable connection, had several phone lines coming into his house, and ran his own little mini-ISP. This was back when cable ISPs first launched back in the 90's. Before he got caught, cable was pretty much wide open. You could get as much bandwidth as the node would pump out. (so downloads as high as 700kps weren't unheard of.)....you could also browse your node segment as if it were a local network, including all the workgroups in the area, AND you could access file shares across segments, if you knew the IP of the machine and the share name. So we all have that idiot to than for our limited bandwidth on our cable connections. (*sigh*...those were the good ol' days)

      --
      Who cares about the ozone layer?...thanks to CFC's I can write my name......IN CHEESE!!!
    78. Re:The cheapest solution... by danheskett · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sign up for a regular package you want, and call up and ask for a static ip address and a reverse address.

      Most of the black lists out there that block spam based on "dynamic" ranges do so based on what IPs are allocated to dial-up ISPs and home style cable modems. I've not had any problems with speakeasy's being accounts of any type being blacklisted. Your mileage may vary. Even if you don't get a static IP from speakeasy, the lease times are very much staticish. I dont have speakeasy no more, but I had the same IP from them for like 18 months - even though it was "dynamic".

    79. Re:The cheapest solution... by rfc1394 · · Score: 1

      ". . . its (sic) not really that unethical (although it is illegal) . . ."

      Yes, it is quite illegal. Most states call it the "Theft of Cable" act, or more recently, "Theft of Information Services." In my state, it's a felony that can get you up to five years on the first offense.

      The FCC has stated that they alone have exclusive jurisdiction over unlicensed radio frequency spectrum. This means the state does not have jurisdiction to prosecute over the issue of radio frequency use. Now, to argue theft of cable there are several issues involved (1) the cable service is somehow being tapped into; (2) use of the signal by tapping into it reduces the ability of others to use the signal; (3) the supplier of the service is losing some revenue that it can't charge. In the case of tapping into cable, you've made a physical connection to someone else's service. You also, almost certainly, had to tap into a secured connection box.

      Now, let's consider that the cable company installs a line into an apartment. The prior customer moves. You move into the apartment as the new tenant. You find a cable TV connection in the apartement. You hook up to it. The connection was totally legal. Are you stealing service? Well, you're not paying for it, but the connection was legally made. They can cut off your service if they want but I do not think they can back bill you for the unpaid time between the last customer and now. And they cannot charge you with theft of service since you're not making any unauthorized connection to their service. Same thing if you use the electricity in the apartment, you can't be charged with theft of service. But if you go out to the meter and tap into it, then you can be charged for theft of electric service.

      But, more importantly, you are saying that theft is "not that unethical." Or, to put it another way, "theft is ethical." Okay, so when somebody steals your car you won't press charges because it's ethical?

      This presumes connecting to an unpassworded, unsecured network over a wireless connection is somehow a crime. When someone steals your car, they remove its posession from yours, they deprive you of its use. As the victim of a car theft (and they caught the guy who did it so I got my car back) I understand the significance of the difference.

      Let's consider, some guy goes out for the evening but leaves their TV on with the curtains open (so you can see it) and their windows open (so you can hear everything), and their VCR is not recording anything (so you're not preventing them from using their signal). You, sitting on the sidewalk, decide to change the channel using a universal remote while they are gone, and when they come back you change the channel back. Have you stolen anything from them or in any way deprived them of their property? Exactly what crime, if any, have you committed against them? Maybe sending a remote control signal into their apartment could considered trespassing, but I find that a little bit of a stretch.

      What's that? Not the same thing? I disagree. First of all, both cases of theft are statutorially illegal. Second, you paid for your car (probably still are like most of us), so you should get to decide who uses it.

      I think there is a big difference between deprival of use of a physical, nonsharable and nonfungible resource, and someone else's using a fungible, perishable resource (bit time slices used less than capacity are lost whether you use them or not) having no physical existence.

      The Cable Companies paid for the infrastructure. Don't they have the right to determine who can use it?

      Once they provide a legitimate connection they have no right to determine what you watch as long as you don't take pay-per-view signals through unlawful means. In fact, the law is clear that it's perfectly legal to capture any satellite transmission for view

      --
      The lessons of history teach us - if they teach us anything - that nobody learns the lessons that history teaches us.
    80. Re:The cheapest solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      To keep the scam going? A six-year-old can know enough to be an electrician. And you're wrong, wrong, wrong about ethernet. There's transformers on both ends. Dumbass.

      And yeah, I know about coax and triax. Who the hell uses that anymore?

    81. Re:The cheapest solution... by lewp · · Score: 1

      It is I, Yokomoto Comp!

      --
      Game... blouses.
    82. Re:The cheapest solution... by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Jesus man, 1,500 watts?
      I cook dinner with less than that.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    83. Re:The cheapest solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry for the double reply, but I misspoke in my first reply.. I stated that the most nodes I've ever detected at once was 247, when I meant to say that the most I detected **without moving my laptop** was 247.

    84. Re:The cheapest solution... by Jonny+290 · · Score: 1

      properly installed ethernet lines are balanced and optoisolated.

      Durrr.

      --
      Hey Taco! Looks like you're using the "infinite monkeys and typewriters" scheme to generate Ask Slashdots again...
    85. Re:The cheapest solution... by tylernt · · Score: 1

      True, but at least you're not violating the AUP that way. :)

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    86. Re:The cheapest solution... by tommyth · · Score: 0

      That's fairly amazing. It would be even more amazing if most of them worked... I can't imagine the latency of the overlapping channels and garbage data on the same channel.

    87. Re:The cheapest solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like how 16th and Park looks better. Battery Park looks nice too.

    88. Re:The cheapest solution... by MemoryAid · · Score: 1

      That is one way, but a better way is WiFi Speed Spray.

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    89. Re:The cheapest solution... by bjb · · Score: 1

      In my NYC apartment, I've got 14 Wi-Fi networks that my iBook can pick up from the couch. Of that, 3 or 4 of them are unprotected (typically indicated by the "Wireless" or "Default" or "Linksys" network name). Strange, there is one "dod.gov" that is also unprotected...

      --
      Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
    90. Re:The cheapest solution... by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      You can buy a low-end package and add a static IP address a la carte for an extra $5/month.

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
  2. Easy, get dial up, then by Free_Trial_Thinking · · Score: 0

    Get dial up then have a dedicated 2nd phone line just for it, and leave it connected 24/7. I did this in college and never had a problem. There are lots of free programs out there to do stuff like keep your connection alive, redail on dissconnect, etc.

    Good luck.

    1. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by Bri3D · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except that a 2nd phone line+dialup costs the same as broadband, so you might as well get the broadband.

    2. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by NoUse · · Score: 1

      Before cable modem was available in my neighborhood I actually put a modem in a Linux box and set up NAT. So one phone line provided access to like 4-5 PCs.

      The only thing I didn't have was an automatic redialer but that wouldn't be too hard to find.

    3. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by Osty · · Score: 4, Informative

      Get dial up then have a dedicated 2nd phone line just for it, and leave it connected 24/7. I did this in college and never had a problem. There are lots of free programs out there to do stuff like keep your connection alive, redail on dissconnect, etc.

      Unfortunately, most "unlimited" dial-up plans are actually hour-limited. If you read the TOU carefully, they'll tell you what "unlimited" means, but it's typically a high (but not impossible) number of hours per month. If you pass that limit, you'll either get blocked for the rest of the month, or charged a very large amount, depending on the ISP. Not every ISP will catch you, and those that do won't catch you every time, but if you keep a dial-up connection up 24/7 for months on end, any ISP you use will notice sooner or later and take some action.

      The best thing to do is ask when you sign up for the ISP. They may have a more expensive dial-up plan that allows you to stay up 24/7/365. It might cost you $30/mo rather than $10/mo, but that's still cheaper than $50/mo broadband.

    4. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by thebes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But then you're sucking up the cost of the phone line PLUS the dial up account. That would cost at least as much as cheap DSL.

    5. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by sanityspeech · · Score: 1

      Get dial up then have a dedicated 2nd phone line just for it, and leave it connected 24/7. I did this in college and never had a problem.

      That would be nice if that worked reliably, but my experience with dial-up suggests that users are periodically kicked offline. Not exactly desirable for your purpose, but some view that (i.e. not always being 'on') as a security measure.

    6. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by hAkron · · Score: 1

      When I had dial-up in the dark ages, I used to keep it up 24/7 just by having my mail client check for mail every minuet. I guess you could also just run a script that does a single small ping every once in a while. I did get some nasty emails from my ISP, but they never shut me down.

    7. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Besides it's practically impossible to find unlimited dial-up. They might say it is unlimited, but it is probably like 250 hours. 90% of ISPs are full of it.

    8. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Well, I did the same thing years ago (Earthlink, as it happened) and I worked out a deal with them where I could be online continuously, so long as I bought their business Web hosting package. Since I ran a small consulting business back then and needed the site anyway, it worked out fine for a couple of years. Then one day Earthlink terminated my service without warning, saying that I was an "account abuser" and that was that. I pointed out that I had an agreement in writing from their business sales department allowing me to stay on continuously. Didn't matter: apparently living up to contractual obligations wasn't part of Earthlink's business practices at the time. Some pointy-haired, boneheaded executive got it into his head that Earthlink would be more profitable if they got rid of all the "abusive" users. So some 75,000+ people got axed in one day, I was told. Really pissed me off, let me tell you. And as I was a full-time contract developer at the time, I regularly recommended ISPs to a lot of people. Needless to say, Earthlink got no more business out of me and I haven't had a good thing to say about them since. Their loss.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    9. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by orangesquid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Exactly. I was on "Unlimited" access with DelaNET. After being online for a bit, I started getting e-mails, something to the effect of:

      "By unlimited, we do not mean unlimited. You are using your connection without limit, which is not the meaning of unlimited. You can't possibly use your connection 24/7. What you're doing falls under the category of business connectivity, and if you keep staying online, your rates will shoot up into the hundreds of dollars per month." (from joybenz@delanet.com)

      I'm not kidding.

      I wrote a script to stop pppd at 2AM and restart it at 6AM. No more annoying emails!

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    10. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "demand" and "persist" options to pppd?

    11. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by don.g · · Score: 1

      This assumes you use the *first* phone line...

      I currently have no phone line at home. But I do have broadband :-)

      --
      Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
    12. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by d00d92 · · Score: 1

      dialup isps are like that? Thats strange since the dialup isp that i used for about 8 years had no problem with me being on 24/7. The only restriction he had was 12 hour sessions. Just had windows redial on disconnect. I also paid 14.95$ a month since the beginning for that service, normal residential service.

    13. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by Mold · · Score: 1

      Depends on where you are at.

      Where I live, the dialup+extra line is about $24/month cheaper than the lowest broadband.

      I can get a second phone line for $6/month, but broadband prices here are insane. And you can only get it in two towns in a 70 mile radius from here. The cheapest I can get from my ISP (the only one around with broadband) is 256/128, for $40/month.

    14. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by Beardydog · · Score: 1

      I live near Seattle, and everytime something goes wrong with our connection, I pine for the days of nocharge.com. Free dialup access for anyone who wanted it, and they encouraged you to leave it on 24/7. I could run an ftp server on my computer, I could connect my laptop on their local line from any of my friends' places and pull things off of it if I needed to...it was glorious.

      Traffic started getting bad as more people found it, then one day it just stopped working for me, and everyone else I knew who used it. I tested it now and then for about a year, but it never worked again. Their site is still up, but I haven't tried in quite a while.

      They claim to offer service in the "Northwest and New England" now.

      They did seem to have a lot of service flickers, and they changed their username/password setup a lot. I always suspected it was because they made all their money through their 10 dollar tech support fee.

    15. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides it's practically impossible to find unlimited dial-up. They might say it is unlimited, but it is probably like 250 hours. 90% of ISPs are full of it.

      If you're in Canada, Sympatico unlimited dialup is really unlimited. I used to use over 700 hours a month, constantly maxing out my bandwidth, without complaint (in fact, they offered me better rates when I phoned to cancel). There weren't any timed disconnects either, I had sessions lasting over 2 weeks. The regular monthly cost was $24.56 for the internet service, and $25.46 for the phone line, including taxes.

    16. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by LighthouseJ · · Score: 2, Informative

      When I was on Mindspring before Earthlink swallowed them, I had my linux server dialed into Mindspring 24/7, when the call was dropped, pppd would autorespawn and redial out. After a while, I would receive emails saying that it's against TOS to run an FTP server etc... which I wasn't doing, I just wanted the always-on type of connection. Mindspring's setup forced the modem to redial every 24 hours, but I was never denied service or charged for fully using the connection. They'd always quote me as using 43,200 minutes or more for that month, basically the numbers said that I split my time between being connected and dialing the modem.

      However, the minutes aren't exactly accurate because if I was disconnected and redialed, their servers wouldn't update themselves that I disconnected, so for a short time, it would look like I was logged in twice simultaneously. This wasn't a problem until Earthlink screwed everything up, causing busy signals, and crap. After Earthlink came along, I got charged for simultaneous logins. I called the people and asked "wtf?" and they parroted the problem and TOS. I asked them what phone numbers were used on my account to call in and they said "they are all phone number whatever". I blew their mind and asked "How could my modem be connected to two other modems at the same time?". Either the person on the telephone understood and credited me the charge on the next bill or silence fell over the phone.

    17. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by Maxwell · · Score: 3, Informative

      For $29 dollars you can get 128k DSl from sympatico, without needing an extra phone line. Your paying $50 for dial up. Hmmm.

      That' what my parents have, and it just what this guy wants. He needs to research local options.

    18. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by Zephiris · · Score: 0

      Actually, most of the 'less expensive' ISPs (eg, not Earthlink) have automated hourly accounting. This makes sure that the very second you surpass the limited number of hours they provide. Some of the cheaper ones only have 100-300 hours per month. For VERY casual use, 300 might be okay, but it adds up if you happen to talk for a few hours, then leave it to download for a few more. My current ISP (Joi Internet http://www.joiinternet.com/) costs $10 a month ($7 if you prepay for an entire year), but their number of hours averages out to having to average 20 hours a day to even possibly fill it. There's no feasible way for me to do that.
      It took me several months just to find an ISP that was under $10/month or under, plus didn't cap the hourly rate to a completely unreasonable level. "Unlimited" doesn't mean unlimited hours, often, but unlimited access (aside from a few ports here and there).

      --

      "A Goddess rarely smiles for she is forced by others to be an island unto herself." - Zephiris
    19. Re:Easy, get dial up, then by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1
      For $29 dollars you can get 128k DSl from sympatico, without needing an extra phone line. Your paying $50 for dial up. Hmmm.
      Remember that the DSL options never include the ISP cost. When you add that extra $10, the price becomes $39. Wow, that looks a lot like the $40 he's already paying for his broadband. Thanks for helping him save $1 a month. ;)

      The original question posted is something I've thought about and been irritated by. I currently have cable internet (CableOne in Boise, Idaho). It is $45 a month ($40 if you have cableTV service too) for the 1.5Mbit connection. Our DSL in this area is provided by Qworst, and they charge more if you don't have a home phone line. Their bottom level DSL connection is 750K speed, which is just a few dollars a month cheaper(after cheap $9.99 ISP cost added), but if you get an equivalent speed to the cable, it is the same price as cable--very frustrating.

      I do have a neighbor's wireless in range of my house, but I'm a pretty heavy bandwidth user sometimes since I'm trying out different Linux distros and doing some re-installations, which would swamp the guy's connection.
      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  3. Stealing WIFI maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or atleast co-oping with some neighbors to save money.

  4. motionsensor + autoconnect by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 5, Funny

    feel like you're always on by having your computer connect as you enter the room ;)

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    1. Re:motionsensor + autoconnect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am intrigued by your ideas and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

    2. Re:motionsensor + autoconnect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This actually is possible if you have a bluetooth enabled computer and, say, a bluetooth enabled cell phone. I know there are programs that can be set up to do all sorts of random tasks when a bluetooth device is detected.

      That said, I'm not familiar with any such programs off the top of my head.

    3. Re:motionsensor + autoconnect by LinuxHam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Did exactly this with Misterhouse and diald. I configured the reaction to the staircase motion sensor to be a ping to an off-network IP. Previously, I just configured diald to be "always connected" to my office VPN (an 800#). It took months before they nagged me about it, so then I moved to the motion sensor approach. It definitely stopped the nagging.

      As an aside, you may be able to get free (or cheap) AOL/Yahoo!/MSN IM on your cellphone. I get all three unlimited for free on my Nextel. I only use the AOL piece and created a separate id just for the phone. ("g33kb0y" and "g33kb0ycell" for example)

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    4. Re:motionsensor + autoconnect by dtk13 · · Score: 1

      Thats actuly not a bad idea... I may do that if i cant get broadband. Right now Im wrestling with verizon to get me broadband. My neigbor has it and he lives on the same DRIVEWAY!!!!

    5. Re:motionsensor + autoconnect by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Right now Im wrestling with verizon to get me broadband. My neigbor has it and he lives on the same DRIVEWAY!!!!

      Can't convince your neighbor to let you share his connection?

    6. Re:motionsensor + autoconnect by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      I am intrigued by your lack of originality and would like you to donate your brain to science so that we may finally be able to study the missing link. ;'P (Nothing better than being a wiseass)

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    7. Re:motionsensor + autoconnect by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Funny
      Right now Im wrestling with verizon to get me broadband. My neigbor has it and he lives on the same DRIVEWAY!!!!

      Don't get too upset; most ISPs won't even consider providing broadband service to the homeless.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    8. Re:motionsensor + autoconnect by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Funny
      ("g33kb0y" and "g33kb0ycell" for example)

      You misspelled "c311".

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    9. Re:motionsensor + autoconnect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure a motion sensor would be a good idea. I wouldn't want my computer connecting and disconnecting five times a second when I'm looking at porn.

    10. Re:motionsensor + autoconnect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up funny!

  5. Not many options by yotto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Make sure everybody calls your cell and use your land line for internet. I did that for about two years before DSL was available in my area.

    1. Re:Not many options by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Better yet, you can set forward-on-busy to your cell phone.

    2. Re:Not many options by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 1
      Make sure everybody calls your cell and use your land line for internet.
      Alternatively, many phone companies will let you automatically forward your calls to another number if your phone is busy or you don't pick up. This would work well for a landline when you are dialed in because your calls will be forwarded to your cell phone right away. It's also nice when you're away from home because if you don't pick up after a few rings the call will be transferred. This service is generally around $2 or $3 per month, and in fact could end up saving you money if you already pay for voicemail on your landline since you could just cancel that and use your cell phone's voicemail.

      I actually discovered this option when I was thinking about the race condition of picking up my land-line phone to see if I have voicemail at the same time somebody is calling me. I know, I'm crazy to worry about something so rare, but it led me to find a solution that has many practical advantages, such as voicemail consolidation and the fact that I only need to give out one phone number now.

  6. In the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    In the UK, over the last couple of years, there's been a rise in the number of broadband packages that offer fairly high speeds but with low usage rates (1-3GB a month). Some can be had for as cheap as £14 (~$25). Sounds like just what you need. So emigrate.

    1. Re:In the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's really sick is the number of european low-usage broadband packages for around £5 a month.

      We're so far behind :(

    2. Re:In the UK by maglor_83 · · Score: 1

      Lots of places in Australia have a similar thing. $25 ( US$20) gets you 250MB, with either extra per MB over, or the speed limited to 64Kbps for the rest of the month.

    3. Re:In the UK by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

      And it's only as much as $25/month because of the tanking dollar. Continental European rates can be lower still, the UK is still Rip Off Britain.

      --
      Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  7. The Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tin cans and string?

  8. where do you live? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I only pay US$27/mo for SBC DSL in California.
    Not much more than the cost of a second line + dial-up account.

  9. In a nutshell by realmolo · · Score: 1

    No.

    There are a few companies that offer DSL/cablemodem service for $25/month or so, but not many. And there aren't ANY that do it for less than that. There's just no money in it. Hell, there's not that much money in DSL/cablemodem service even at $45/month.

    1. Re:In a nutshell by PuppiesOnAcid · · Score: 1

      I'm currently paying $20 per month for 256k down, 128k up. Unfortunately it's through a local company and only available in my locale.

    2. Re:In a nutshell by KillerCow · · Score: 4, Informative
    3. Re:In a nutshell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      256kwhat? Is that kbit or kbyte?

    4. Re:In a nutshell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, in Europe I have 1Mb down, 256kb up for 15 euros and I know that one or two phone companies gives you 2Mb down for the same price if you already subscribe to their phone plan.

    5. Re:In a nutshell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Standard nomenclature for bandwidth tends to be bit/s, so I think that's a good assumption - especially since 256Kbit/s matches, roughly what most "discount" DSL lines run at.

      256KByte/s (2Mbit/s) doesn't seem to make much sense.

    6. Re:In a nutshell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I thought so, but since my friends always talk about the speed the browser gives (in kb/s), I thought I better ask.

      Anyway, that's really mediocre considering that most people here have 2Mbit/s for about the same money, provided they already have a cable-TV subscription, or a bit more money if they don't own cable-TV. Strange how the USA is a developing country when it comes to the "last mile".

    7. Re:In a nutshell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in Australia there are plenty of ADSL plans for around US$20/month, but they have download limits of 200-500MB. They are still very popular despite this, so there must be a big demand for an "always on" connection just for email, IM and checking the news.

    8. Re:In a nutshell by Cidtek · · Score: 1

      And Rogers Lite is only $19.95 CDN (Hudson Bay Pesos)

    9. Re:In a nutshell by broadbandguy2005 · · Score: 1

      For Canada Broadband checkout: http://www.broadbandmarket.ca It's a 'submit one form get multiple competing quotes' type of site. or http://www.canadianisp.com It's an ISP locator site for Canada, with comparison functions.

  10. one word by Catcher80 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    hotspots ! go live in your local mickey d's ;)

    jack a neighbor's wireless!

    i have no ideas :(

    --
    I sell out to The Man every day.
    1. Re:one word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A hotspot at McDonalds? What kind of fancy McDonalds do they have in your area? At the ones near me you'll be lucky if there are any seats left not taken by homeless people.

    2. Re:one word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like its time to break out the wiffle bats!

  11. Let`s change ;) by puiahappy · · Score: 1

    I have a cable at 256kbps and 2Gb monthly data transfer for 9$ i`d be glad to pay just 40-50$ for a conection like your`s. For a unlimited transfer and 1Mb/s speed my friend gives 125$/month.

    --
    Think like a hacker, act like a hacker, but never become a hacker !
    1. Re:Let`s change ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MH....

      With Cox Cable im paying $30 a months for 1Mb/sec (Alot of regions get 3Mb/sec for same cost) with no tranfer limits, looks like your either out in the sticks, or youve been had

    2. Re:Let`s change ;) by Bri3D · · Score: 1

      Where do you live? I have 1M/384 long range WIRELESS(b/c I can't get cable/dsl where I live) with a 10GB limit which you probably won't hit without warez or bittorrent for $79 a month. And the lag is only about 50ms.

    3. Re:Let`s change ;) by puiahappy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am From Romania :( and we have 2 choises dial-up at 16.4kb/s at 8 euro/month or cable at 256kb/s 2Gb(9$), 4Gb(15$), 8Gb(20$), 16Gb(29$). And of course fiber (2Mb/s) at more than 1000$/month

      --
      Think like a hacker, act like a hacker, but never become a hacker !
    4. Re:Let`s change ;) by Bri3D · · Score: 1

      I see...you have the crappy SE Europe telecom. I am from US, so I don't have that problem :-).

    5. Re:Let`s change ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you guys really have it bad.

    6. Re:Let`s change ;) by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Do vampires come with that?

    7. Re:Let`s change ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i`d be glad to use horrible grammar and put dollar signs on the wrong$ side of the number, and use backward`s comma`s like you.

    8. Re:Let`s change ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm from Holland. Here we have plenty of choice, starting at 1:75 overbooked ADSL starting at Euro 9,- a month (512/256Kb) fair use. Personally I pay Euro 79 for an 8Mb (down) 2Mb (theoretical up, practical is 768K), NON-overbooked ADSL connection, with unlimited traffic and Quality of Service (voip, video). My connection will be upped to 24Mb in about three months.

  12. A practical solution by Faust7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    my usage doesn't really justify paying $40-$50 each month for hundreds of kb/s

    Cancel your cable TV subscription and get BitTorrent. Your broadband cost will suddenly be justified.

    1. Re:A practical solution by Catcher80 · · Score: 1

      yeah but where are some good places to get torrent downloads these days, suprnova and lokitorrent are the shutdownohnoes

      --
      I sell out to The Man every day.
    2. Re:A practical solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      When in doubt go back to your roots (*cough* #bt on efnet *cough*)

    3. Re:A practical solution by Ian+Action · · Score: 5, Funny
      yeah but where are some good places to get torrent downloads these days, suprnova and lokitorrent are the shutdownohnoes

      Hey, no problem! Check out...

      Wait a minute... You don't work for the MPAA do you?

      --
      Why am I not rapping? I am rapping with you in a way.
    4. Re:A practical solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      torrentreactor.net
      btefnet.net
      baka-updates.com
      boxtorrents.com
      bi-torrent.com
      shuntv.net
      mysp leen.net

    5. Re:A practical solution by comwiz56 · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://isohunt.com/ has a torrent search... very good results, pretty much the only thing i use now that suprnova's gone.

    6. Re:A practical solution by Catcher80 · · Score: 1

      your reply was pretty pointless... so here's a more pointless one!

      yes i admit to being the worlds largest MPAA lackey.

      *rolls eyes like an emo kid*

      --
      I sell out to The Man every day.
    7. Re:A practical solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      myspleen.com not .net, .net isn't working

    8. Re:A practical solution by Catcher80 · · Score: 1

      sweet thanks >:D

      --
      I sell out to The Man every day.
    9. Re:A practical solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. We will get to work on these at once.

      - MPAA

    10. Re:A practical solution by CygnusXII · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Usenet alt.binaries.multimedia, alt.binaries.mutimedia.scifi, alt.binaries.great, alt.binaries.movies, alt.binaries.movies.divx, alt.binaries.svcd, alt.binaries.stargate-sg1, alt.binaries.svcd.yenc, and plenty of alt.binaries (mp3 take your pick.) These are but a few of the groups. Usenet is the lost and disavowed medium of the Internet. I really think any of the **AAs' will ever go after it, because it is way to decentralized and posters are in unenforcable regions. It would probably be easier for the **AAs' to push the Usenet Access out of ISP's than to get it shut down entirely. One good example is AOL, dropping Usenet Access. If your ISP doesn't offer a good News Server, go with a pay Server, there are a few good ones out there, and access is relatively cheap.

      --
      My cat's picked up a Hammer. HEY! Put down that Hammer. Put Down that Hamm...THUNK!
    11. Re:A practical solution by d00d92 · · Score: 1

      #tvtorrents on efnet

    12. Re:A practical solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not the only one with this idea in mind I guess...

    13. Re:A practical solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One very nice page listing all the main torrent sites: http://www.orbdesign.net/bt/

    14. Re:A practical solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!

      lame ness lame ness blah blah blah

      Please try to keep posts on topic.
      Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
      Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
      Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
      Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropri

    15. Re:A practical solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      isohunt.com
      thepiratebay.com
      torrentreactor.net

    16. Re:A practical solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they also support mininova.org

    17. Re:A practical solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Second that buddy, and in addition, I hear linus is saying:
      "P2P is for pimps, real men use NNTP to download all they need" ;-)

    18. Re:A practical solution by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Actually, as someone who has broadband internet, I'd like to remind you that there's a FANTASTIC posibility that you have "free" cable already. There's a reason they offer you "cheap" cable if you have high-speed internet; because you probably already have the service.

    19. Re:A practical solution by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      Actually, he makes a valid point. I hadn't used the two mentioned, but tvtorrents and tv-swarm are always having some sort of problems. This week it's w2.tvtorrents.tv (but was www.tvtorrents.com - yeah, a while ago), or maybe w1. Try them both. Eventually one will work. Tv-swarm is off for good, as far as I can tell. It's no fun just getting into the swing of things, only to be punted somewhere else.

      There's btefnet.com, but the shows I want seem to be in AC3 audio. No good to stream to my prismiq. And something I really never had to deal with from the other sites. Yet I seem to put up with the frustrations, partly because I'm learing something new, and partly because it's still free.

    20. Re:A practical solution by bshroyer · · Score: 1

      That's not just funny -- I'm writing that down...

      --
      The cure for cancer is coming: Reovirus
    21. Re:A practical solution by zbuffered · · Score: 1

      What newsreader program do you reccommend?

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    22. Re:A practical solution by mailman-zero · · Score: 1

      I don't have cable anything anymore. I'm on DSL now and I don't need cable anymore. A friend of mine who still has cable internet but who cancelled his cable TV still gets the Discovery Channel. I say of all the possibilities for a free channel to randomly be getting he got pretty lucky (it could have been Telemundo... or UPN *ducks*)

      --
      Let's play video games with mailmanZERO
    23. Re:A practical solution by Jonner · · Score: 1

      If you have cable internet service, ditch the regular phone line and get a VoIP service. This will save quite a bit and is less likely to garner the notice of the MPAA.

    24. Re:A practical solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forte Agent is what I use personally. www.forteinc.com

    25. Re:A practical solution by MasTRE · · Score: 1

      > Cancel your cable TV subscription and get BitTorrent. Your broadband cost will suddenly be justified.

      Uh, if you cancel your cable why would you want to waste your time downloading the same crap over the net? That's like saying sell your Hummer H2, get a hybrid, but start burning fuel in your backyard for no good reason (just to pollute, I guess).

      Here's an idea - cancel your cable, get broadband but do not "get BitTorrent." Your broadband will seem free now and you'll have a lot of newfound free time to do something useful with your life. Use it any which way you please - start your own business, make new friends, do something for a worthy cause. Anything's better than vegetating in front of the non-stop ad tube, wasting your life away.

      --
      Must-not-watch TV!
  13. Jesus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    You already have dirt cheap Internet compared to most other countries in the world and yet you still want more for less?

    My guess is if you can't justify $40 a month you don't need it to be always on.

    Why don't you check what $40 a month will get you in some of the worse off countries, like say Greece or South Africa.

    Nothing, thats what.

    1. Re:Jesus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think she wanted less for less.

    2. Re:Jesus... by Saiyine · · Score: 0, Troll


      you still want more for less?

      He wants less, for less. And I think it's a great idea.

      --
      Hosting 20G hd, 1Tb bw! ssh $7.95
  14. Ug. Just Deal-Shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typically a second phone line + a dialup ISP isn't significantly less expensive than the cut-rates that DSL costs. I pay $20/month for DSL. A second line would cost $10 & a dial-up provider would be $10 more too.

  15. Depends by saleenS281 · · Score: 1

    on if you already have a land line or not, and if you're willing to have it tied up all the time. A second phone line + dial-up will probably cost you just as much as a cheap DSL would. Heck, if you don't have any line at all, it'll probably cost you more for a phone line + dial-up. 3 the tele monopolies.

  16. always on? by MotherErich · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've never had my DSL/Cable connection go out on . . .

    --
    You have to be smarter than the machine you're working with.
  17. 40 Bucks for broadband? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, pack your bags and move. There's many nice countries in this world, and I bet there's one to your likings that doesn't have such outrageous prices for online access.

  18. Check with your cable/DSL company by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Informative

    some of them have slower connections that you can get for less money(though they don't like to advertise them). For example, the cable at home I can get for $25, or you can get a faster connection for about $40, of course YMMV

    1. Re:Check with your cable/DSL company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dude that video.

      Just... no.
      I now have permanent psychological damage. And just when I was getting over Yatta.

    2. Re:Check with your cable/DSL company by KanSer · · Score: 1

      My ISP is Shaw, a cable T.V. and modem service provider for western Canada, B.C and Alberta. They have a cable modem package called Shaw Lite! Speed.

      Worst moniker ever, I know. I'm on it now (the price is right) and I get at least 16k/sec to around 30k/sec which is more than enough for the web (lies, downloading porn in video format has become painful and my best argument for paying full price again...) and I get awesome ping times in games, even with voice communication software sucking up bandwidth.

      It's much less than half price, comparable to dialup prices. As an American who moved here recently I'm amazed how shitty the broadband experience can be in America, comparatively. Dialup has been practically choked out of here, by the super competitive pricing of broadband service.

      And this is in the face of much lower population density, with a great number of people being out of the range of quality DSL. Frankly Shaw saw a brilliant market and capitalized on it brilliantly. Everyone I know that has a computer has Shaw cable.

      I hate to sound like an advert but you WISH you had an ISP that bent over backwards for you like these guys do for me. The horror stories I've heard about Verizon and others, I'm so glad to have Shaw. I'm such a shill, but that's what good service does.

      --
      • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
  19. Lite tiers by Guspaz · · Score: 1

    Many ISPs here in Canada (Montreal) have "lite" tiers of DSL/Cable that are about $19.99 per month Canadian. That'd be about $16 per month US.

    1. Re:Lite tiers by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      $8.95 per month for 128/128K cablemodem access here in Regina, Saskatchewan... if the market wants this product, it will come out.

  20. I've got an idea by oil · · Score: 0, Troll

    How about if you just pony up like the rest of us. You won't get "always on" for $5/month in the foreseeable future.

    When BOPL starts getting rolling, maybe overall prices will go down because of competition but I doubt they'll go as low as you'd like.

    1. Re:I've got an idea by CrackHappy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ok...

      I'll bite..

      What does "BOPL" stand for?

      "Bastard Operators Pay Less"?

      "British Ogres Prance Lightly"?

      "Bright Officials Party Long"?

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d Capitalization really works: i helped my uncle jack off a horse
    2. Re:I've got an idea by oil · · Score: 1

      Broadband over Power Lines (usually BPL, my bad)

      http://www.nwfusion.com/details/6121.html

    3. Re:I've got an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BOPL: Broadband Over Power Lines

      A technology that is always just around the corner, but never seems to get officially launched.

      As for the guy in the submission, what makes always-on so important for you. Do you really want to get tedious emails all the time, do you really like getting interrupted all the time? I've done the best two days coding I've done in a long time by doing it on my girlfriend's computer earlier this week, because she doesn't have any form of internet access.

    4. Re:I've got an idea by Altanar · · Score: 1

      Broadband Over Powerlines

    5. Re:I've got an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BOPL = Broadband Over Power Lines.

      Somehow it's proponents think giving another monopoly (The Power Company) the ability to sell internet service is going to drive down broadband prices, much like how competition from The Cable Company forced The Phone Company to price DSL service reasonably. Oh, wait...

  21. price by dukerobinson · · Score: 0, Troll

    How about you find a way to lower the market price of always on high-speed connections and don't try to compromise to the detriment of everyone else?

  22. DSL Lite by Talisman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    BellSouth offers DSL Lite; a 256/128 dsl circuit for $24.95 per month. Perhaps your local DSL provider offers something similar.

    Or, download NetStumbler and sniff out an open WAP in your neighborhood and leech bandwidth. There are about 5 I can reach from my house.

    --

    "Study your math, kids. Key to the universe." -The Archangel Gabriel
    1. Re:DSL Lite by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Don't you need some kind of amplifier? Wireless does not go very far around here using regular equipment.

    2. Re:DSL Lite by Talisman · · Score: 1

      Where's "here"?

      --

      "Study your math, kids. Key to the universe." -The Archangel Gabriel
    3. Re:DSL Lite by MilliAtAcme · · Score: 1

      I can see more than 200 open APs from where I'm at with a 21db gain directional antenna... ;-)

  23. Piggybacking works, and it isn't always stealing by matyas47 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Find a neighbor who's got wireless and offer to pay half the cost. My landlord got wireless a few months ago. I was still on dialup at home at the time, but I had wireless in my laptop for hitting the hotspots. He told me to go ahead and use his connection, since he's paying for it anyway. (I did offer to cover half of the cost, but he simply repeated that he's paying for it anyway, so he didn't care.)

  24. ... except...... by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    rolling out a cable over the Atlantic is going to cost

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:... except...... by crazney · · Score: 1

      emigrate
      v : leave one's country of residence for a new one; "Many people
      had to emigrate during the Nazi period" [ant: {immigrate}]

      --
      stuff
  25. ISDN? by Bri3D · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You could try a single ISDN(56k), though it might be more expensive than broadband anyway.

    1. Re:ISDN? by paganizer · · Score: 1

      Only cost effective in Tennessee; they subsidize it do to an ancient compact between bellsouth and the state.
      you can replace your regular phone line with a ISDN, and end up getting 2 lines for $35/month, and bellsouth internet doesn't charge extra for ISDN.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    2. Re:ISDN? by tverbeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Assuming you can find an ISP who'll charge you what ISDN is really worth these days (rather than pricing data access over a single 64k channel as if it were "broadband"), it's not a bad option. As I recall from the days when I was running my web server over an ISDN line, the line itself isn't horribly more expensive than POTS. Even if you don't get "always on" service from your ISP, it's darn close to "instant on" (at least compared to V.whatever handshaking over POTS). Plus you get a second phone line out of it (e.g. for a fax machine, second answering machine).

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    3. Re:ISDN? by Cramer · · Score: 1

      That "compact" is that TN ran fiber all over the state. And the TN PUC refuses to let them bilk their customers like they do everywhere else.

      And bellsouth.net does charge more for ISDN... $14.95 for 56k dialup, and $20.95 for ISDN (single channel) -- at least in NC. And let's not forget Hellsouth.Net are still the only dumbasses disabling software compression to "speed up signon" -- CCP doesn't add any human measurable time... it takes 30s to login because it takes 30s for the modems to train, and 3s on ISDN where 3s are spent in IPCP while the NAS dhcp's an address for you (it tends to give you the same address every time, tho.)

    4. Re:ISDN? by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if you think 6x more expensive isn't horrible. Minus the tax, tag, and dealer prep... a POTS line runs about $12-13 throughout Bellsouth's lands; ISDN is $75-80, except in TN where it's something like $23 (that's what it was last time I looked and B$ stopped updating the ISDN pages about, oh, 25 years ago -- even the ISDN department (all 3 of them?) don't know when those pages were touched or who would. They are now "archived" deep inside the DSL web pages. *sigh*)

  26. Vonage by looneyboy784 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    find a neighbor with highspeed intenet pay for a vonage line for it. run a phonline from the vonage box to your house and use it for dialup. im suprised noones thougt of this.

    1. Re:Vonage by Bri3D · · Score: 1

      Why? $19.99/mo for vonage+$10/mo for dialup=$29.99/mo. Plus your neighbor will want payment($5). That's $35/mo. For that you can get entry-level DSL. Plus VOIP doesn't really work too well for modem data. It's Voice Over IP and a modem connection will probably drop on it anyway.

    2. Re:Vonage by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      If you are going to do that, you minght as well just run ethernet and share the cost of the broadband connection with your neighbor.

    3. Re:Vonage by IDkrysez · · Score: 1

      What, are you talking about running a modem over VoIP?

      --
      Was it a bat I saw? Racecar. Stack cats. A man, a plan, a cat, a ham, a yak, a yam, a hat, a canal--Panama!
    4. Re:Vonage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modems don't communicate over VoIP due to the heavy compression.

    5. Re:Vonage by cbreaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's possible/probable that Vonage doesn't have enough frequency band to support a modem.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  27. you miss broadband when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you like downloading Linux ISOs

    or want to download anything else bigger than 50 megs

  28. Repeater madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Find a couple good WAPs in your area, then setup the corresponding number of repeaters so the signals all extend into your area. That way, if one goes down you've still got a couple alternatives.

    I'd also set aside some money for a generic wireless card that uses the prism2 chipset, just in case someone decides to enable WEP (laff) encrpytion.

  29. Dial-Up/Linux by Zebra_X · · Score: 3, Informative

    Your only other option is a dial up connection. If you want it to be dedicated however, you'll need a dedicated phone line. That will run ~ $16 - $25 Dollars US add in $5 mo. for your dial-up provider. Worst case you are at $30 best case $21.

    The trick is to use a dial on demand linux box. You can have a script that will automatically dial into your provider. When you get kicked, it calls back. Couple this with an ethernet card and you'll have a gateway, and even a hardware firewall to protect you from all the evils that would have their way with your box. You can also use this machine for common services such as a caching DNS server which will speed up page load times over dial-up and as a mail gateway which also speed up perceived mail send times.

    1. Re:Dial-Up/Linux by Secrity · · Score: 1

      In most places I've seen in the US, a second phone line is going to cost $30 ~ $40 US a month after taxes and such. Cable broadband has much fewer taxes and crap than POTS. The total cost for my broadband cable is less than than the total cost of the second phone line that the cable modem replaced.

    2. Re:Dial-Up/Linux by k31bang · · Score: 1

      The trick is to use a dial on demand linux box. You can have a script that will automatically dial into your provider. When you get kicked, it calls back. Couple this with an ethernet card and you'll have a gateway, and even a hardware firewall to protect you from all the evils that would have their way with your box. You can also use this machine for common services such as a caching DNS server which will speed up page load times over dial-up and as a mail gateway which also speed up perceived mail send times.

      That almost perfectly describes Actiontec's Dual PC Modem.

      --
      -+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+ *** http://www.mountainfort.com *** +-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-
    3. Re:Dial-Up/Linux by Zebra_X · · Score: 1

      I'm paying $25 for my telephone line and I 3-way calling, caller ID and call forwarding. I also have some sort of regional calling plan. The basic line in my area (Northeast) with out any of that was $18/mo.

    4. Re:Dial-Up/Linux by Technician · · Score: 1

      The trick is to use a dial on demand linux box. You can have a script that will automatically dial into your provider.

      Instead of dedicating a Linux box to be a gateway, Spend about $70 and get an ActionTec Dual PC modem. It has dial on demand built in. It also fits next to the network switch just fine.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    5. Re:Dial-Up/Linux by nolife · · Score: 1

      The trick is to use a dial on demand linux box.

      Smoothwall or Freesco if you want a pre packaged solution for that setup (both do much more as well). I used Freesco running from floppy on a 486 with 12MB ram when I had dialup and it worked fine.

      Getting off topic here but anyway..
      I am using Smoothwall at home now on a P200/128Mb with 3 nics and fully optioned (DHCP/Snort/Squid/DDNS/DMZ etc) and it is running great. It seems every single home router I've tried has some very annoying issues or some bug somewhere in one form or another and I finally got frustrated and built the Smoothwall box. One model home router would not work with the PS2 headset regardless of DMZ status or ports forwarded and would randomly drop computers off the local network, one model would slow to a crawl when passing pop email and would stay at crawl speed until rebooted, one model would choke with heavy multiple connections (bittorrent, some games, and usenet) and would not recover, it also took up to 20 minutes with multiple reboots for it to get a DHCP address from Comcast. The list goes on and on. I understand these are home routers but you'd think they would at least work. Funny how I rarely see firmware updates for them either. I have not tried any of the Linksys models but Dlink, Netgear, SMC, and ATT have failed me.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  30. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about Dial-Up. If your such a casual user then surely waiting a few seconds for some cheap external modem to connect surely isn't a problem, and you don't download much either.

    Infact this topic is somewhat troll like since the answer is right infront of you, and since you seem to want several people simultaniously pointing out your answer, here it is; $18 or less a month for dial up.

  31. DSL? by Patik · · Score: 1

    Around here, the cable ISP is $45 or so but we also have Verizon DSL which is considerably slower and only $30/month (assuming you have a landline already). What's your per month price limit, anyway?

  32. Got neighbors? by spywhere · · Score: 1

    Instead of swiping a neighbor's wireless, why not make an above-board deal with the folks next door?
    If you're within 100 meters, you might be able to run a piece of Cat5e from your house to theirs. Offer to pay half of their cable Internet costs for access...

    or, if they don't have broadband, offer them access to yours for twenty bucks a month.

    1. Re:Got neighbors? by Bri3D · · Score: 1

      Or, y'know, you could just aboveground grab the wireless. Just set up an 802.11b antenna(I've seen them for $5) in the neighbor's window. Then invest in stuff that supports WPA because WEP can be cracked with enough data packets. For $50 setup you have wireless to neighbor.

  33. just use the wifi... by bird603568 · · Score: 1

    have you ever thought of when ever you need the net, go wardriving? Or start your own wifi for neighbors. Get a T1 line and ration it out a squid server. Your neighbors pay for say 500 kbs. If you get a amp and a good omni you can server your whole neighborhood. or if your town has a wifi compinay leach from them. there a great part in this book http://www.gloop.net/books.htm

    1. Re:just use the wifi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never mind that you'll violate the hell out of part 15 and eliminate your type certification on the equipment, voiding your authority to operate it......

    2. Re:just use the wifi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he just becuase you use an amp dosent mean you broken part 15.

    3. Re:just use the wifi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  34. Check with your ISP by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what selection you have with ISP's, but where I'm from, Ottawa Canada, all the Broadband ISPs offer capped connections that are about 5-10x faster than dial-up, for about $20-$25 a month. So, you get cable or dsl, always on, but slowed down, for a reasonable price. This is what I get, as the only reason to need a faster connection is to download movies and stuff. I even download Linux distributions, which are slow, about 6 hours per CD. But it doesn't really matter, as I only download a new distro maybe every 2 months.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  35. Metronet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know a couple of people who use metronet - VERY low bandwidth cap (200meg) but only £10 a month http://www.metronet.co.uk/adsl/paygo

  36. Re:Ug. Just Deal-Shop by homer_ca · · Score: 1

    You'd be lucky to pay just $10 for a second line. After taxes and fees my landline from Verizon with no long distance and no calling features cost $28 a month.

  37. ISDN by strredwolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ask ISP's around if they still do ISDN. Granted, it's 128K, but since most everyone's broadband, the price should be cheap now. Plus, you don't need to light both B channels all the time. Keeping the D channel lighted at 9600 bps for small stuff will keep you online all the time anyway for monitoring (like POP or long, slow downloads), and for harder stuff (regular downloads, surfing, etc) you can light the B's up.

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    1. Re:ISDN by grumling · · Score: 1
      but since most everyone's broadband, the price should be cheap now.

      I just had a conversation with someone this morning about ISDN. Quest quoted him $700/month for 1B+D service. Then there was a hugh installation charge. Quest doesn't want to do ISDN, so they set the price really, really high. However, the reason he wants ISDN is because he's too far away for Cable or DSL, so there may be a penalty charge for distance.

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    2. Re:ISDN by Cramer · · Score: 1

      One word: IDSL (range: 50k+ ft.) [it's basically ISDN with all the signalling removed.]

    3. Re:ISDN by Cramer · · Score: 1

      You don't know how ISDN works do you? You don't push data over the D channel. I've not seen any telco's that don't change per packet for data over the D channel. Or per-packet for packet switched calls -- assuming they'll even do packet switched calls at all. [Bellsouth won't.]

      ISDN is just like POTS, just with different hardware. You still have to dial in just the same. The process takes a few seconds instead of minutes, but it's still dialup. 128k is done via multi-link PPP, which has to be supported by your ISP and your local hardware/software. And ISDN is far more complex than DSL/cablemodem/POTS -- there's no "plug it in and it works."

      [Disclaimer: I've been around ISDN for a decade. It was my connectivity solution for 7+ years. I use a cablemodem now... 1/4th the cost and ~70x faster.]

  38. Re:Ug. Just Deal-Shop by CheapEngineer · · Score: 1

    Second line here is $37/mo and DSL is unavailable. Cablemodem is $42/mo + $10 month modem rental.
    Try again!

  39. Cell Phone options by mikejz84 · · Score: 1

    I would suggest shopping around for cell phone plans. Some appear to offer unlimited data service for a around $15-$20/mo extra. I am not 100% on the details but it is worth a look. Have you looked to see if a open Wifi AP exists around you? PS: How can you be a Slashdot users and only use the Internet a little?

    1. Re:Cell Phone options by cente · · Score: 1

      Cept for one problem: Cell phones are the WORST for hitting you with the "fair use" tome. I used to sell sprint cells and the coordinator told us specifically to watch for people who are using it only for that purpose and strongly recommend against using it for that purpose because the company would shut them off with "too much use" on an "unlimited" plan.

    2. Re:Cell Phone options by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      my guess is that it is not unlimited data, but rather unlimited* data

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    3. Re:Cell Phone options by mikejz84 · · Score: 1

      Of course if he is not looking to do a ton of downloading, he might not hit that unlimited limit.

    4. Re:Cell Phone options by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      knowing most cell phone providers 250 megs = unlimited

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  40. Some creativity by Piquan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Okay, let's consider alternatives to always-on.

    Autodial gets you a good portion of the way there. A good autodialer should take only a couple of seconds, in other words, not much longer than you need to focus on the screen anyway.

    A cronjob can fetch your email periodically, so you can glance at your screen and see that you have mail. And you don't care if there's a few seconds delay on your outbound mail; let your MTA deal with that.

    As for webbrowsing... hmmmm, that's a bit tougher.... Okay, here's one. Put in a proxy. If the net connection is up, then it just works transparently. (And by the way, Squid really does seem to speed up my web fetch times, even from the same computer!) If the connection is down, it brings it up, sure, but what to do in the meantime? Well, if you're visiting /., then it says "Nothing to see here, move along". If you're not, then it redirects to the same URL with a typo (so you'll assume you screwed up), and then displays a parking page. Okay, that sounds pretty authentic.

    IM? Piece of cake: grab an IRC server and a bunch of Eliza-bots.

    Okay, you're all set! Always-on experience, on a dialup budget!

    1. Re:Some creativity by Cramer · · Score: 1

      An analog modem will take more than "a couple of seconds" to train. I just timed it... it took 23sec from the time the modem went off-hook to "CONNECT". Add a few (~3) seconds to login and you're very nearly a half minute. That's a long time to wait -- twice the default DNS timeout of 15s. And that's with a digital phone line -- any noise or faults on your POTS line will add to the training time.

      (The same call via ISDN took *3* seconds)

  41. Qwest DSL - Qwest ISP, no e-mail $20/mo by reezle · · Score: 1

    Not sure if you are in their coverage area, but I set up my grandmother on Qwest DSL, and when asked if I wanted MSN or AOL as the ISP ($40/mo or somesuch), I replied neither, then they finally relented and admitted they could be a no-frills ISP for the line and the whole thing would be $20/month. That was $20 for DSL and ISP services.

    Between that, and a hotmail account it beats her paying $25/month to AOL for dial-up.

  42. use GPRS by Keruo · · Score: 1

    If your mobile phone is new enough, and your operator supports it, you could use GPRS for surfing/email.
    I'm not sure what the data transfer fees are for GPRS data in usa, but here plain random surfing/email gives me ~$5/month extra in my bill.
    That would be near your budget if the pricing is same. Though I'm guessing you could even get it cheaper there if the operator just supports it.

    --
    There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
    1. Re:use GPRS by athakur999 · · Score: 1

      Both T-Mobile and Cingular in the US offer unlimited GPRS access as an addon to your voice plan for $20/month. There are data only plans but they're the same price as cable/DSL would be to begin with.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    2. Re:use GPRS by neutron+scott · · Score: 1

      T-zones for $5 is enough if you use their proxy, port 8080, as your HTTP proxy in Firefox... I get 40kbit/s with that, though i usually proxy it through a compressed SSH tunnel.

    3. Re:use GPRS by Skuggamara · · Score: 1

      $20 for Cingular? I know that T-Mobile offers this, but never seen unlimited data from Cingular at $20. I am currently contemplating a switch from T-Mobile to Cingular, and the data price is the big gotcha for me. (I use a Treo 600 for e-mail and web surfing) If this is true, can you please provide me some more concrete information? (Links, or personal experience)

      On Topic: Probably not an inexpensive alternative, but the Cingular EDGE network (PCMCIA cards available) seems to be a very good system (200-400kbps down, not sure up), only problem right now is tha $80/month unlimited data charge.

    4. Re:use GPRS by athakur999 · · Score: 1

      Looks like they raised to prices since I last looked at it. Unlimited GPRS is $25 a month now from Cingular. Cingular calls this service "MEdia Net - Unlimited".

      https://www.cingular.com/media/media_net_purchas e

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
  43. Amateur Radio: Digital Packet Radio? by IDkrysez · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can anyone speak to using "Amateur Radio" equipment to do this? I think the only ongoing costs would be power -- up-front costs include equipment and licensing, but I think you could get there (modem speed always-on) for under $100 on a budget, and possibly closer to megabit for 1k USD. I also hear that a) you can get into big trouble if your unlicnsed, and b) can lose your license and/or get into bigger trouble if you abuse your licensed privileges. IIRC there are no-code packet license now, which means you don't *have* to learn morse code to pass. This also uses some already-established [public?] radio infrastructure, namely repeaters, if I've made any sense of the subject at all... IANAH (hammer). Am I way off here, folks?

    --
    Was it a bat I saw? Racecar. Stack cats. A man, a plan, a cat, a ham, a yak, a yam, a hat, a canal--Panama!
  44. Well, there are many options by cmclean · · Score: 1

    OzForces offer 64K/64K ISDN for $14.99/mo. Of course, this assumes you are in Australia. If you are in one of the 24 other countries which use dollars, perhaps you should be a bit more specific?

    --
    "Any similarity between the hooting of a million eager monkeys and Slashdot is purely coincidental." -THEFLASHMAN
  45. Be Happy by bmazloum · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Be happy with what you have. I just moved to Lebanon, waited 6 months for a "high speed" connection. That's 30KB/s downloads and 12KB/s upload for a whopping $120USD/mo. I'd take your connection and prices anyday. Funny thing is, this is $200USD/mo. cheaper than the dialup since you pay/min. here. haha...

    --
    A computer is only as smart as the person sitting infront of it.
  46. Re:Ug. Just Deal-Shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's for your first line, no? Many providers offer a second line at a considerable discount, but I pay under $20 for my one line, so I guess I'm in a cheaper area than you.

  47. Re:Ug. Just Deal-Shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought I had it bad in the UK with £7.50/m second line rental and £20/m broadband with £5 cable modem rental (well, that's expired now). No wonder the market in the US is moving away from fixed lines so quickly, save yourself the rental and the telemarketing. Neat.

    I thought the US was all 10mbit cable for $20/m with a free hooker visit every three months. Seems like I was mislead.

  48. what some do by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

    in the uk, there are ISP's that offer 150kbps always on, unlimited broadband for less than some dial up companies (£14.99 per month, compared to about £15.99 iirc for aol dialup)

    if your in the uk, those companies are tiscali, plusnet and probably cpbb.co.uk

  49. It's not just the speed with broadband by urlgrey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From having had numerous friends and family members bemoan that "I just don't use the Internet that much!" as justification for not getting DSL/cable, in 100% of the cases, they've all had worlds open up when they saw how painless things became once their access was so dramatically faster. (Waiting several seconds for a single page like Yahoo! to download gets tedious quickly.)

    Their faster access meant more Internet usage (now they're paying bills online, banking, and shopping for instance), which in turn meant they "needed" the higher speed conenction.

    Very quickly, they realize how much more than just faster speed, the faster speed meant.

    --
    Running 'Nix is like owning a Lightsaber. It's "a more elegant weapon for a more civilized time."
    1. Re:It's not just the speed with broadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but obviously that's not the case here, since the poster has already had broadband for some time and is now looking to get rid of it. I guess "worlds didn't really open up" for him.

    2. Re:It's not just the speed with broadband by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      Just like a heroin addiction, right? What? I'm up at midnight reading slashdot when I have to get up at 5 am for work tomorrow? Damnit! Damnit! Damnit!

    3. Re:It's not just the speed with broadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im up 5 in the morning reading slashdot when im supposed to be at work... now?.. ahh!!

  50. Re:Ug. Just Deal-Shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Try again?"

    It ain't my fault you live in the boonies where you can't get dsl, pay too much for a phone-line, and where there is no competition.

    Allow me to save you up to $120/year by suggesting you just buy a cable modem--before deals, they cost less than half that. With deals, you can often get them free after rebate.

  51. Re:Amateur Radio: Digital Packet Radio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only feasable in the microwave bands. This is usually accomplished using off the shelf 802.11b equipment (which falls in a shared used band, which means as a ham operator you can use amplifiers and higher gain antennas, only at the restriction of following the regulations associated with amateur radio).

    However, once you're in the microwave band, you're pretty much dealing with line of sight anyway. You're not going to bother too many people with what you do there and its highly unlikely that you will get caught.

  52. Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about cut the useless crap like this and find me a way to get broadband without moving.

  53. Dialup by jsimon12 · · Score: 1

    Unless your neighbors have unencrypeted wireless and don't mind (read as "don't notice" ;) your usage then just get dialup and configure it for autodial and turn the modem noise down.

  54. "Modem"? by Bnonn · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Mo-dem speeds"? Wassat?

  55. Sell the excess by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Maybe you could go ahead and pay the $40-per-month, but then sell the remaining bandwidth to your neighbors in an informal deal, reducing your total costs to about the same as cable. However, then you have to deal with customer service issues from your neighbors.

  56. light DSL is your solution by LullySing · · Score: 2, Informative

    light DSL is usually maximally 128Kbits down, but it's ( a very gimped, usually for people that barely qualify for ) DSL.

    they usually charge around 15-20ish dollards a month for that kind of DSL access up here in montreal, canada, and it would solve the always-on, cheaper for bling problem you're having.

    As for me, nothing will make me part from my fixed ip 3meg adsl line for 60 canadian a month.

    --
    Peace and happyness to you, by LullySing ;)
  57. Speakeasy by miyako · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Speakeasy.net will allow you to sublet your DSL connection (not sure of any other providers that officially support this). You might look into just making back some of your cost by subleting out connections to a few neighbors over wireless. Offer a wireless connection and maybe a few other services and price according to how many subscribers you have (maybe divide the cost of the connection evenly?)
    I have a friend who does this, and has had some pretty good luck. Biggest thing to watch out for if you do that is to have some sort of document outlining what exactly you offer (especially that you have no uptime garuntee, and what, if any, tech support you offer, and when).

    --
    Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
    1. Re:Speakeasy by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      Speakeasy also offers a service to help you with billing and the like; all you have to do is set yourself up, find willing cohorts and offer a deal. They credit your bill, and the legal footwork is theirs. The disadvantage is that they do take a significant cut, and you can't exactly make a profit at it.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    2. Re:Speakeasy by omahajim · · Score: 1
      The disadvantage is that they do take a significant cut

      Speakeasy credits you 80% of what you charge the neighbors, directly to your broadband bill. But they give your "WiFi NetShare" customers (who are really their customers) 3 speakeasy.net email accounts (that can be POP'd), a backup 5 hr. per month dial up account, and telephone tech support. If the total of all your credits total up to more than the total montly cost of your account, you don't get the extra money back.

  58. GPRS? by fm6 · · Score: 1
    ... my 2.5G wireless phone can give me internet access on a shoestring (with free evenings and weekends) but [not] that always-on quality.

    If your network uses GPRS (I'm told most 2.5G networks do), then you have a connectionless network, and in theory an "always on quality" is a basic feature. The reality may be that your provider forces a login procedure on you that prevents that. (Just as DSL providers mostly force their users to establish a PPPoE connection, even though the DSL link itself is always on.) There's probably a way around that, but I have no GPRS experience to guide you with.

    If you have another protocol, then you might consider switching providers.

    1. Re:GPRS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, 2.5G does mean that its got GPRS on top of digital GSM, ala wikipedia.

      Also regarding login, its pritty much standard PPP login, no fancy PPPoE, just dial the GPRS access number on your handset (usually summat like #99#*1) and it will start a data connection like a modem...

  59. Re:Ug. Just Deal-Shop by quanticle · · Score: 1

    No...
    That's Japan ;-)

    --
    We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
  60. Re:Vonage Doesn't work...tried it..... by budword · · Score: 0

    DNS went out on my cable conection, but the vonage phone worked fine, tried a dial up account I use on the road, wouldn't work. :(

  61. Broadband in the US seems expensive by Saville · · Score: 1

    Here in Vancouver we have Shaw selling Lite always on cable connections that are "up to 5x faster than dial up" for $25CDN ($20.29 US today) and Telus selling regular DSL for $30 CDN ($24.35 US today) if you sign up for a year. Sounds like what you're looking for. Too bad your local companies don't have something like that.

    Hopefully prices will come down for you guys. Prices may come down for us now that Shaw (cable company) is offering digital cable phone services in cities like Calgary, Alberta to completely remove Telus from the loop. Competition is good :)

  62. I don't understand by pclminion · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm missing something, but why not just get a second phone line and leave yourself dialed in to your ISP 24/7? Surely that'll cost you less that $40 per month.

    1. Re:I don't understand by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Probably because that would get you bounced from the ISP real quick. ISPs charge a premium for dedicated lines, and generally view an effort to use a basic service line in this manner as abuse.

  63. Re:Amateur Radio: Digital Packet Radio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In theory yes (ie. the technology can do it and at the right price or less), but in practice no because the licensing conditions don't allow it.

    The very first bit of porn or heavy politics that comes down the line will get the FCC frowning at you (in principle), and conditions in other countries are even more stringent.

    This is why amateur radio has basically died, with the exception of long-distance DX'ing on HF which is not really about service communications but about beating marginal path challanges.

  64. How about UUCP? by zoid.com · · Score: 2, Funny

    This isn't really the solution but it's the on we used 10 years ago to send email. Wow.. Things have really changed in the past 10 years.

  65. I bet you do well with the ladies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Sorry darling, no flowers or fancy restaurant tonight...but here's some budget meat and there's the kitchen. Make me a a beautiful dinner while I'm on the computer would you love?" Explains why you're on slashdot mate.

    1. Re:I bet you do well with the ladies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol "budget meat" ... bet she's off getting some 'quality meat' when he is out looking for other 'bargains'.

  66. It's all a matter of perspective! by d!al3r · · Score: 1

    I live in Serbia and pay 40$ for my 256 kbit/s cable connection. Average salary in Serbia is 3,100$/year. And you complain about 40-50$ a month with an average salary in US being around 36,000$/year?

    1. Re:It's all a matter of perspective! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans make more money the anybody in the world and are the first ones to bitch about prices.

      With this kind of mentality, no wonder your jobs are being outsourced and everybody in the US will be reduced to making a minimum wage salary.

      Pay the *hell* up! Pay up for Linux, pay up for Cable, pay up for music, pay up for everything you don't make with your own two hands! you f&#king cheapskate.

  67. Re:Ug. Just Deal-Shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $10 a month rental? I would suggest buying your own. Cable modems can be had for $50-100 these days.

  68. Try my ISP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    My ISP, "Linksys", is said to have nationwide presence, and best of all, their service is free! They are Wi-Fi only, however; look around, they might be servicing your neighborhood.

    This is not a plug. I'm just a happy consumer, er, I mean, customer ;-)

    1. Re:Try my ISP by thecombatwombat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Linksys is pretty great. In my area they seem to be much more reliable than "default."

    2. Re:Try my ISP by adnoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is good advice! They did a major rollout in my neighborhood on Christmas day, in fact. What dedication.

      --
      No sig
    3. Re:Try my ISP by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Funny, and only slightly off-topic, story... When I lived in Arizona, I got a new wireless AP and couldn't think of an SSID. It was a D-Link so it was set to "default" by default. But I didn't want to interfere with my neighbor's "default" network, so I changed it to "eldefaulto".

    4. Re:Try my ISP by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Watch out for the compitition though. "Wireless" and "Netgear" take up a good part of this market.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:Try my ISP by assassinator42 · · Score: 0

      http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/60574 DSL Reports'd?

  69. Cable service tying by tepples · · Score: 1

    Cancel your cable TV subscription and get BitTorrent.

    Except with many broadband providers, canceling your cable TV subscription will also cancel your high-speed Internet access.

    1. Re:Cable service tying by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 1

      No, they just double how much you have to pay for cable modem service. Unfair business practices? What are those?

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
  70. Is that legal by Valiss · · Score: 1

    ..and if not, how can someone catch you?

    --

    -Valiss
  71. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you think someone too cheap for broadband will pay Philly's %4 wage tax + a local tax on divdends for free wi-fi?

  72. Value Broadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Cox offers a "value" high speed. 128 kb/s up and download, perfect for what you're doing. It runs for $24.99/month if you have any other Cox services.

  73. Re:Ug. Just Deal-Shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Allow me to help you by suggesting that you get outside. See the sun, and stop having your parents BUY EVERYTHING FOR YOU.

    Oh yeah. And let me say... naive dumbshit.

  74. Always-On LAN dialup on the cheap : 3com Office by martinbogo · · Score: 1

    At many of the big computer surplus stores ( e.g. like Weird Stuff warehouse in Sunnyvale, CA) there are a lot of surplus office solutions that do pretty much what you want.

    My favorite? The 3Com OfficeConnect 56K Lan/Modem. It's basically a small router with an integrated 56k modem (does PPP and SLIP), and a four port switch. 3Com model number: 3c886

    I've seen them for anything between $5, and $20. They automatically dial the LAN when a network request is generated, and drop the line when a phone is picked up.

    Just my $.02

    --
    "Don't worry about the problems you have in mathematics, I assure you mine are much greater." - Einstein c.1919
    1. Re:Always-On LAN dialup on the cheap : 3com Office by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      I've used a couple of those 3Com OfficeConnect boxes for putting small offices "online" via dial-up: a great, cheap solution, but still a little sluggish getting connected. 3Com also made an ISDN version which I used for my home data center before DSL was available here.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  75. Re:Ug. Just Deal-Shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, the expensive lines are in areas where they think they can milk people for the cost, because they're effectively a necessity. Anywhere on the east coast, for example, even in the middle of nowhere, delaware.

  76. Volunteer based networks by DaKritter · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am network admin in one of the larger volunteer networks in the area (Copenhagen, Denmark). We get internet for ~$8.7 a month (50 DKr). We share a 45 mbit line between 2400 apartments, of which 1400 have internet service. Commercial ISP's have about the same bandwidth for that amount of users, perhaps even less.

    The cheapest DSL is still 3 times more expensive and I frequently download stuff at 20 mbit. We also provide TV and POTS, equally cheap. Switches in the basements, copper to the apartments, fibre between switches and buildings. Been a huge work, but quite fun and worth it.

    You can get started with lot less, just share an single DSL between 10-20 apartments. Here such networks are all the rage, popping up everywhere anytime.

  77. Cox Basic -- Unadvertised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use Cox Communications Basic service for broadband over cable. They don't list it on their site but you can call and ask for it. It's $25 a month and 256Kbps downstream & something like 64Kbps upstream.

  78. But in the US... by DarkTempes · · Score: 1

    yeah. that's cheap.

    for $25 USD you can get AOL w/ unlimited time.

    or even a cheaper alternative like $10/month dialup w/ unlimited time

    and i personally (since cox has a deal with the local university) pay 25/month for cable, 5mbit down, 512kbit up, and virtually no low usage cap.

    1. Re:But in the US... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      that's $25 plus your phone line (another 20 or so?)

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  79. ISDN by D.A.+Zollinger · · Score: 1

    While it isn't "always on," the 2 second connect and authentication time lag makes you feel like it is always on. As well, since companies who provide dial-up also compete for ISDN, you are sure to get a very competative rate compared to broadband. Sounds exactly like what you want, and I would seriously recomment that you investigate ISDN options in your area.

    --
    I haven't lost my mind!
    It is backed up on disk...somewhere...
  80. Your options are: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $10 a month for image compressing 5x dialup or $25 a month for cheap DSL

    http://secure.dslextreme.com/

    Want something inbetween? Share with your neighbor.

    1. Re:Your options are: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Image compressing dialup is crud. Most images are already compressed these days.

  81. YHBT. YHL. FOAD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:YHBT. YHL. FOAD. by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      And you, apparently, have no sense of humor. I pity you. It must suck to go through life without a humor muscle. Or is that a humorous love muscle? I always forget which. ;P

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    2. Re:YHBT. YHL. FOAD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you = not funny

  82. Don't make the tail wag the dog by EtherMonkey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think your going about this the wrong way. While you might not NEED the speed of high speed Internet, you admit you want the convenience of always on service.

    I would urge you to look in a different direction. Instead of dropping the HSI, (high speed Internet), I'd drop my analog telephone service and switch to a VoIP provider. Depending on the optional services and amount of long distance, you could save $40 or much more each month by using an unlimited VoIP package from Vonage, VoicePulse, AT&T, etc versus traditional telco rates. Since you also have a cellphone that apparently works at your home, there's really no downside to this scenario.

    If you are dead set about nixing your HSI, your best option is to find an agreeable, nearby neighbor to share their HSI account. But if you do this, definately use wireless -- not copper -- to connect to his/her service. Differences in ground potential between houses can destroy equipment, cause a shock or even be a fire hazard.

    You could use something like a Multitech RouteFinder RF500, or any other router that provides a serial port to use an external modem for ISP dial-up. This would give you an always-on dial-up connection. However, since a bare POTS line for your always-on Internet is around $22/mo, plus a bare-bones, unlimited dial-up ISP is another $10/mo, when you add in taxes and fees, you're maybe going to save $5 - 15 per month: not worth it in my view.

    ISDN, at least in the USA, is probably not an attractive option, since most telco's charge per minute of use per B channel, plus the ISP's usually charge a higher rate for access. Where the telco does offer unlimited data service it's at a considerably higher rate than $50/mo. So you'll pay more for slower speed via ISDN.

    I know several people who have "cut the cord" to the phone company and rely solely on VoIP over the Cable Internet and cellphone for voice calls. They save an average of $30/mo and are quite satisfied with the quality and reliability.
    --
    --- A man with a briefcase can steal more money, than any man with a gun. [Don Henley]
    1. Re:Don't make the tail wag the dog by incom · · Score: 1
      "Differences in ground potential between houses can destroy equipment, cause a shock or even be a fire hazard."
      So, your saying that my 85+ft long copper into my garage, with the wire being badly frayed, open to the elements, and loose connectors, isn't such a great idea? It's got a pretty bad packet loss, but I can still access it at 3+MB/sec.
      --
      True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
    2. Re:Don't make the tail wag the dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to beat a long dead horse, but it is worth checking on your local ISDN pricing. ISDN is still dial-up, so you can't setup your web server on it, but the actual dial-up time is maybe a couple seconds and there are lots of ISDN routers that handle the actual dialing seamlessly. I am living out in the sticks of Tennessee at present, and pay a total of $40 for my ISDN telephone line (vs $20 for regular POTS) and $28 for bandwidth-on-demand dual-channel ISDN access via my ISP. He also offers single channel ISDN for $22. I know this isn't a good option if you live someplace where you can get DSL, but it's worth remembering this long dead technology if you're living in a van down by the river.

      Oh, it's worth mentioning that no part of my setup is "metered".

    3. Re:Don't make the tail wag the dog by EtherMonkey · · Score: 1

      Ok, but that's $68/mo, which is not bad if that's all you can get, (and I've got two customers in that position, but they're paying more than $68/mo, more like $200/mo for non-metered access), but it's higher than the $40-50 the OP is paying for HSI.

      There are plenty of ISDN routers that will hold-up at least one B channel, so it can be used for servers. With BACP, the 2nd B channel is added as bandwidth demands increase.
      --
      --- A man with a briefcase can steal more money, than any man with a gun. [Don Henley]
    4. Re:Don't make the tail wag the dog by EtherMonkey · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, as long as its inside the same house it should not be a problem. This is because all the AC outlets in your house are, presumably, bonded to the same Earth ground return at your service panel, so all the equipment plugged into these outlets have the same ground potential.

      But, if you string a wire to a neighbor, their service is grounded at a different place, and there could be a difference in ground potential between the equipment plugged-in at your neighbor's house and that plugged-in at your house. This difference in potential might only be a few millivolts, but it could result in significant current as the two grounds attempt to find equilibrium through your Cat-5 cable. Of course, the network equipment should isolate the signal jacks from the electrical supply, but I wouldn't want to risk my network, or even my home, to the engineering quality of a $100 (or less) network switch.
      --
      --- A man with a briefcase can steal more money, than any man with a gun. [Don Henley]
    5. Re:Don't make the tail wag the dog by digitalsushi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Differences in ground potential between houses can destroy equipment, cause a shock or even be a fire hazard.

      And this information might sound alarmist, but there's even more to it -- crossing a legal boundary point (i.e. a mailing address) is against the law. You can be held responsible if you run a wire from one building into another, and that line causes damage. I used to work for a dialup ISP, and we ran some cat5 from one 5 story building to another, underneath the street. We found out what we did was completely illegal, and if that building ever caught on fire, we'd be screwed big time if that line were still there.

      So wireless has more than just tech advantages :)

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    6. Re:Don't make the tail wag the dog by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      2 solutions then.
      1. optical (but fiber is a pain to run...and is expensive.

      2. what if you ran ethernet (that is protected form lightning, etc) and you had 2 UPS switches on both ends? would the voltage regulators in the UPS save your cheap equip?

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    7. Re:Don't make the tail wag the dog by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      Hell, the cable at my place had a sufficient ground differential (somehow) that the installer could feel it, when he was trying to figure out why my system had such obscene packetloss.

      We plugged into a different three-hole outlet and the problem went away. Turns out the first outlet wasn't actually grounded - it just had a three-hole faceplate to let three-hole plugs be plugged in.

      I could have strangled my landlord right about then....

    8. Re:Don't make the tail wag the dog by tastytang420 · · Score: 1
      But if you do this, definately use wireless -- not copper -- to connect to his/her service. Differences in ground potential between houses can destroy equipment, cause a shock or even be a fire hazard.
      IANALE (I am not a licensed electrician), but I do run a 500-pair DSL system that I designed and had installed on a small Caribbean island. We have copper wires connecting many homes and business -- no fires or equipment failures yet!

      If you ground your system properly, use appropriate wiring and fusing, a wired connection will be faster and more reliable (less interference potential) than wireless -- not to mention harder to intercept: better security.

    9. Re:Don't make the tail wag the dog by EtherMonkey · · Score: 1

      1. optical (but fiber is a pain to run...and is expensive.

      You can purchase used 10mbps hubs or switches on ebay with 10Base-FORL ports for under $200 each. Pre-terminated fibre cable is also up for sale there. I didn't look to see if pre-terminated direct-burial fibre was available, but everything else in the world seems to be for sale on ebay.

      Going wireless is still cheaper and much easier to install. No digging trenches and punching holes in your house.

      2. what if you ran ethernet (that is protected form lightning, etc) and you had 2 UPS switches on both ends? would the voltage regulators in the UPS save your cheap equip?

      Which Ethernet? 10Base2, 10Base5, 10BaseT, 100BaseTX, et cetera.... The *BaseT[x] standards are supposed to isolate the signal from power, but the isolation is typically performed by silicon, and if sufficient current is applied (say by a close lightning strike or significant ground potential difference) this might not hold up.

      UPS's are of no value because they don't provide any ground isolation -- indeed, they must have a clear path to ground to shunt spikes in the A/C line away from the protected outlets.
      --
      --- A man with a briefcase can steal more money, than any man with a gun. [Don Henley]
    10. Re:Don't make the tail wag the dog by EtherMonkey · · Score: 1

      I do run a 500-pair DSL system that I designed and had installed on a small Caribbean island. We have copper wires connecting many homes and business -- no fires or equipment failures yet!

      That is carrier-grade equipment specifically designed for that type of application. Your typical residential broadband router or SOHO switch/hub is not engineered or constructed to the same standards.

      I also bet the NTI's have built-in lightning protection and a DC current block.
      --
      --- A man with a briefcase can steal more money, than any man with a gun. [Don Henley]
  83. Share! by potuncle · · Score: 1

    I had to cut down my monthly expenses and I was torn between loosing the always-on DSL connection I had or saving $30/month by switching back to dial-up. One day I was chatting with my neighbor and he was talking about his slow dial-up connection when I proposed sharing my DSL with him. So, he gives me the $15/month he was paying his ISP and gave him access to my wireless network (which is WAP encrypted and limited to specific MAC addresses). Now he gets high-speed internet and it was much easier for me to chooose to keep the DSL. Oh, and there is nothing in ISP's service agreement against me doing so.

  84. DSL Lite... by microTodd · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm not sure where you live and who your baby bell is but....my DSL ISP, BellSouth, offers what they call DSL Lite, which is always on but has much lower bandwith for less cost, $24.95 a month.

    http://www.bellsouth.com/consumer/inetsrvcs/index. html

    --
    "You cannot find out which view is the right one by science in the ordinary sense." - C.S. Lewis on Intelligent Design
  85. Cheapskate. by Sterling_Aug · · Score: 1

    You better add up the total cost of dialup and an ISP when comparing it to cable or dsl.

    I spend almost $10 per month less with cable that I di with a phone line and dialup.

    I get 4MBits/second downloads with Comcast.

  86. Move to Canada by ninja_sqrl · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you want cheap broadband, move to Saskatchewan. I get 1.5 Mb up, 300 Kb down ADSL for $25 Canadian/month, and you can get 64 kb download speed package (extra-light) for like $12/month. You just have to deal with the shatty weather.......... Older Price List for Sasktel

    --
    Pull my dongle!
    1. Re:Move to Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Score:3, Informative and no one has called him (her) yet on:

      I get 1.5 Mb up, 300 Kb down ADSL

      Methinks he (she) meant it the other way around.

    2. Re:Move to Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget it! I'd rather be able to choose my doctor.

      For now anyway.

  87. Slightly OT: Dial-up by Kris_J · · Score: 1

    Are there any ISPs still putting any effort into dial-up? By this I mean are there any ISPs rolling out v.92, compression proxies or anything else designed to produce a faster, cheaper dial-up experince? Or are they all just killing time until they can drop dial-up for (A)DSL? I'd be particularly interested to hear about any company in Western Australia that specialises in dial-up.

    1. Re:Slightly OT: Dial-up by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      Are there any ISPs still putting any effort into dial-up?

      Pretty much all of the small- to medium-sized ones, I'd think. At least here in the U.S., the broadband market is owned by a fairly small number of large companies, and local and regional ISPs small companies simply cannot get over the barriers to entry. Dial-up is all they have.

      A friend of mine works for one of these, and they tried reselling DSL from SBC, but there was simply no money to be made that way. They were effectively doing marketing and front-line tech support for one of their biggest competitors! So instead they're clinging to dial-up customers, pushing stuff like "accelerated downloads" and caching proxies, and grasping at no-entrenched-monopoly technologies like satellite or wireless access, just to stay in business.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    2. Re:Slightly OT: Dial-up by maglor_83 · · Score: 1

      are there any ISPs rolling out v.92

      I love it how computer stores brag about the benefits of V.92, despite the fact I've yet to find a single ISP in Australia that supports it.

    3. Re:Slightly OT: Dial-up by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know what speed a pair of V.92 modems can connect at when both are simply plugged into a normal analogue home phone line? I believe V.90 drops to 28.8k. Does V.92 do any better?

    4. Re:Slightly OT: Dial-up by ksemlerK · · Score: 1

      I connect at 31.2Kbps using V.92.

  88. Dial on demand? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    I don't know what hardware and OSs support it easily, but I think dial on demand would be the ticket. It doesn't seem to make sense to always tie up a phone line. If you are typing an email, start the connection and it should be up by the time you are done.

    I understand ISDN dials and connects very quickly but it costs more than DSL in most places, last I checked, for me, it was $40 for the line and $40 for the internet service. Ouch.

  89. Re:Amateur Radio: Digital Packet Radio? by kitzilla · · Score: 1
    Am I way off here, folks?

    Yup.

    There are, I believe, some internet gateways from the packet service. They'd be email-only, of course.

    You *must* have a license. You'll need a terminal node controller of some sort and a basic 2 meter VHF rig. The whole thing is a hundred bucks if you shop smart.

    But your communications will be very not private. They're also subject to the "amateur" part of amateur radio -- there's absolutely no guarantee your mail would go through.

    Amateur radio is strictly non-commercial. Even a little text ad at the bottom of of an email would violate your terms of license.

    Hammin' is very cool, and digital services are its cutting edge. But it's no substitute for an ISP.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
  90. Re:Amateur Radio: Digital Packet Radio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a new ham and I'm curious about operating in this band with high power. If I operate in 2.4 GHz under part 97, how do I identify myself? Is the identification requirement waived?

  91. Here in the South.... by bats · · Score: 0, Redundant

    BellSouth (in NC, at least) offeres a DSL Lite connection for $25. You get the always-on, but lowere speeds. Sounds like just what the poster is looking for.

    Surely if we've got it here in Dixie, ya'll should have it elsewhere too. It even includes 20 hours of dialup service.

  92. Get out of the 3rd world! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, move to Japan (or Korea.) I pay $50 a month for 25Mbps Cable-based Internet. Fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) is also available, for $80 I can get 100Mbps, cable digitial tv, and an Internet phone.

    Face it, America is so far behind that soon other countries will need to outsorce to the US IT jobs.

  93. I have the answer! by kuzb · · Score: 1
    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  94. Just get cheaper DSL by jht · · Score: 1

    Up here in Verizon land, they sell DSL for $30/month. And there are a handful of slightly cheaper "naked DSL" providers out there, too - but I'm not really up to speed on them.

    I pay $70 for a Speakeasy setup with 1.5 down, 768 up, and a pair of static IP addresses. Since my wife has a home office that she needs to VPN to the main office from, and I self-host my website and e-mail, it's well worth it. If all I needed was surfing speed, I'd use the Verizon plan.

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  95. Dial On Demand by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    Why do you need "always on" for just email? I've found a mail server using my ISP as a smarthost plus dial on demand adequate for email and news for years. I only went to DSL because it provides faster Web access and doesn't tie up my phone line while I'm reading Slashdot (and it's only $12/month more than dialup).

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  96. Re:Amateur Radio: Digital Packet Radio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ID requirement is never waived. That being said, I don't sweat it much on the 100 mW X-band link I use.

  97. The cheapest solution... by bullring1 · · Score: 1

    That's what i'm doing right now. using Mozilla Thunderbird to rss Slashdot.

    --
    Bullring
  98. that dog from those commercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They had commercials on a long time ago for a dog that could do everything the internet could. You could ask it to get something, say "hotel reservations," and then after you asked it to fetch these things the dog would run away really fast and bring back the plane reservations like they were a stick or a frisbee.

    I don't know how much a dog like that costs or how much food he eats (he could run really fast, so probably a high metabolism), but he at least seemed like a nice party trick. If your not married he could probably get you some dates.

    I think his name was Lycos or something.

  99. Re:Ug. Just Deal-Shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good flamewar. But you're the naive one: my parents are dead, asshole & I buy everything myself. So please change your moronic one-size-fits-all troll-fighting statement.

  100. So don't you guys have download limits? by Xerp · · Score: 1

    Over here in the UK we're currently plagued with cheap broadband that has download limits. 1Mb pipe, £14.99 per month - but you can only download a certain amount (usuall 2Gb). Great if you want always-on and fast transfers. Not so great if you like downloading Linux distro ISO files :)

    1. Re:So don't you guys have download limits? by ambrosen · · Score: 1

      My £16.99 per month is uncapped. But 200Kbps

      But I don't see why it shouldn't be capped. I mean, that's the bit that actually costs the providers money. Still, extra GB don't cost as much as mail-ordering the CDs.

  101. "Regular" speed ISP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about your area but here in eastern Canada, major cable and DSL providers offer so-called "regular" speed connection.

    It's usually 2-3 times faster than dialup but is always on and you pay less.

  102. If you're in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shaw offers exactly what you want; High Speed Lite internet. You can read about it at shaw.ca. I've just moved back to the states from BC, and though US utility services are generally more progressive than in Canada, the one place they have us beat is cable services, both in price and features.

  103. Pay based on volume downloaded/uploaded by udayb · · Score: 1

    If Cable/DSL ISPs provide an option of 'unlimited' or 'pay by volume of data downloaded/uploaded', it will solve the problem of people who would like a cheaper always-on connection. Again, the pricing needs to be fixed appropriately so that people using internet for just browsing and e-mail are able to save a lot if they choose the second option.

  104. To do by kronchev · · Score: 1

    1) Find like-minded people close
    2) Buy powerful wireless router + good antenna
    3) Set up in person closest to middle's place
    4) Split internet cost
    5) All profit, baby.

  105. Better yet... by artemis67 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Offer to secure your neighbor's wireless network for him if he'll let you piggyback, since your bandwidth needs are minimal.

    1. Re:Better yet... by magefile · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well ... I tried something like that once, and my neighbor reacted badly. I apologized once I realized that the offer sounded a bit too Mafia-esque: "hey ... nice LAN. Be a shame if it were to be hacked".

    2. Re:Better yet... by Salvo · · Score: 1

      That way, if his provider complains, simply tell them you were Providing tech support for his network, and needed to read Slashdot for 8 hours every day as part of the Administration service.

  106. Check your SBC DSL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $26 a month and if you sign up now, you get a $50 gift card. What a deal

  107. Extremely Cheap.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cancled my account with SBC, and the line has remained active for more than a year now.

    Cheap dialup, for as long as it lasts...

  108. 10 Housemates, Expense it, or Move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just need to cram ten housemates into your crib. After you share the cost, you have always on and you are paying five bucks a month. Why not? After all your saving a whopping $45 dollars a month on internet fees.

    Okay, that does work for you? Try finding a job where you must maintain a home office and you can expense the internet connection. They are out there, I have one of them.

    Okay, that still doesn't flip your switch. Move next to one of those free wireless access points lurking in the city. If you are lucky, you'll get a cool coffee house nearby and a connection you can use for free.

  109. Re:Amateur Radio: Digital Packet Radio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm... it's waived for telecommand.

  110. 30 to 40 bucks??!? by bbc · · Score: 1

    HetNet's cheapest ADSL is 13 euro a month. No idea why you pay so much for broadband.

    1. Re:30 to 40 bucks??!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps because that's the going rate in the entire continental United States

      If you're suggesting that he move to Europe, I think that's a bit of an unreasonable solution

    2. Re:30 to 40 bucks??!? by bbc · · Score: 1

      Ah, the OP is living in the US? I did not get that from his question. Seems rather rude to me, asking people to help you and then not give them the information they need to help you.

  111. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm surprised no one's linked to Paul Boutin's How To Steal Wi-Fi (and how to keep the neighbors from stealing yours)

    --
    [o]_O
    1. Re:zerg by Dego · · Score: 1

      That link is great unless you have common sense and a brain, in which case you have no use for it at all. I mean, stand near a window? Tilt your laptop a few degrees? Try out the networks? Did you really not know that before reading?

      --
      you can't ack before you balls.. you just .. can't preemptively ack a balls
  112. Use the band width you have by mysterious_mark · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why not get VOIP and get rid of your phone instead, you'll save enough money on phone bills to justify the broadband connection. Also host your own site if you have one, seems better to find a good use for the bandwidth you have, rther than to get rid if it altogether. M

  113. Don't ask, don't tell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the other hand, if you happen to leave your connection unsecured, and your neighbors just happen to piggyback onto it, you aren't actually redistributing, are you? After all, the user agreement does not oblige you to secure your network. And they haven't signed any user agreement, so they have no obligation to your service provider.

    And if the somebody shows up insisting that you downloaded something copyrighted, it might even be to your advantage if anybody in the vicinity could potentially have been the true culprit.

    1. Re:Don't ask, don't tell by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      On the other hand, if you happen to leave your connection unsecured, and your neighbors just happen to piggyback onto it, you aren't actually redistributing, are you? After all, the user agreement does not oblige you to secure your network.

      Again, from the RoadRunner Subscription Agreement:
      2. General.
      (g) Subscriber is responsible in all respects for all use of Subscriber's account, including under any screen name, user name or password by any person, and all use by others of Subscriber's account is subject to the terms hereof and the Terms of Use. For the purposes of this Agreement, all use of Subscriber's account, whether or not authorized by Subscriber, shall be deemed Subscriber's use.

      Your connection, your responsibility.

    2. Re:Don't ask, don't tell by sjalex · · Score: 1

      That is pretty funny. When I installed RR for a TWC contractor, we never secured anything or provided any information to the customers about it. There was no printed material and I wasn't about to try to explain it...

  114. "Budget Plans" in Australia by cranos · · Score: 1

    You should check out the starter plans offered by the big telcos down here. THe biggest rip off I have ever seen.

    Telstra: $29.95 per month 256/128 200 MB Download

    Optus: Same

    AAPT: Similar

    My father in law signed up to the AAPT plan and now he is stuck on a twelve month contract paying through the nose for a measly 200mb per month. I use to get more than that with my dialup.

    1. Re:"Budget Plans" in Australia by bhima · · Score: 1
      Here in Austria we have similar plans: 256/64 250MB monthly for 15 Euros.

      His problem is American marketing.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    2. Re:"Budget Plans" in Australia by lifespan · · Score: 0

      Australian collusion might be contributing a little more than American marketing.

      --
      -- Howto: Get +5 (1) Whine about M$ (2) Namedrop Gentoo (3) Casually Abuse Mods (4) Namedrop Early Computer Model
  115. ...while in NZ... by RyatNrrd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here in New Zealand we have to modulate our own data transfer by beating drums down the phone line, and Telecom New Zealand still charges us a hefty surcharge for the privilege.

    Seriously, acceptable quality dial-up Internet for $US10 sounds luxurious to me, while $US25 for 256K with a limit above 3GB sounds like science fiction.

    Telecom New Zealand sucks arse.

    If you're reading this, and you work for Telecom New Zealand, SHAME ON YOU.

    1. Re:...while in NZ... by J.+Random+Luser · · Score: 1

      $US20 for 256k & 1G/month is available in New Zealand, US$40 for 10G
      Woosh Wireless, of course there's US$70 for the modem...

    2. Re:...while in NZ... by JacobO · · Score: 1

      I was looking the other day at what Telecom and TelstraClear (or whatever they're called these days) were offering these days.
      I was thinking I'd have to stay here in Canada until the situation improved drastically.

      CAD57/mo gives me DSL (3mbps down, 512kbps up, no cap or limits) and cell phone (free evenings and weekends, etc.)

      Having been in your situation a few years back, I feel your pain.

    3. Re:...while in NZ... by RyatNrrd · · Score: 1

      1GB/month?? Maahahahaa, I could download the UNIVERSE! MWAAAHAAHAA!

    4. Re:...while in NZ... by RyatNrrd · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've spent some time in Canada recently. While you're there, make sure you stock up on CDs, DVDs and books, cause we get ripped off for them here too.

  116. Too true about ISPs acting on 'unlimited' usage by Laebshade · · Score: 1

    When I had Bellsouth they sent me an e-mail saying I was abusing my unlimited hours. They advertise as unlimited, I pay unlimited. How can you abuse something that is unlimited?

    They never took any action though.

  117. Depends on how well you know your ISP though.... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Seriously, this may be a case of "score one for the mom and pop ISPs" here. Before I could get DSL or a cable modem connection here, I was stuck with dial-up and wanted an "always-on" connection.

    I simply called a guy I knew personally who owned a small regional ISP and explained my situation to him. Despite him having the usual "terms of service" agreement telling you that "unlimited" didn't really mean the same thing as "always on" - he was happy to overlook my always-on modem connection in return for the business.

    Especially nowdays, with more competition from the large, nation-wide ISPs and with so many people converting to broadband, the little guys left in the business *should* be willing to make some concessions at this point. (Hey, an always tied-up modem port by a paying customer beats an always unused modem port and no customer.) It really depends on if the ISP in question has more capacity than they're able to fill up, I suppose -- but never hurts to ask.

  118. Legal Analysis by ari_j · · Score: 3, Interesting

    DISCLAIMER: First off, know that I am not a lawyer, nor have I ever played one on or off of TV. This comment is not legal advice or legal analysis, despite any evidence to the contrary, and any reliance you take on it is evidence of your own stupidity, and you assume the risk inherent in so doing.

    But something I've heard about from law school professors (don't ask what I was doing in a law school classroom, I'm not a lawyer, remember?) is that we have a doctrine of adverse possession and its related cousin, prescriptive easement. Adverse possession lets you take ownership of land if you've been trespassing on it for 20 years if you have used it as if you were the legitimate owner for all that time. Prescriptive easements don't require exclusivity or possession - you just have to use property for a long time and then you get to keep using it in the same way forever. Also, the statutory period is often lower for prescriptive easements, like 5 or 10 years.

    Enter the digital age. If you use your neighbor's wireless for 5 years straight, you could convince a (very gullible) court to grant you an easement that ensures your neighbor never gets rid of his wireless connection or tries to lock you out of it. And that burden would probably run with his apartment or home, so no future tenant or owner could lock you out of his wireless or cancel his Internet connection.

    Yes, the non-lawyer in me definitely thinks this is a good idea.

    1. Re:Legal Analysis by angle_slam · · Score: 3, Informative

      Prescriptive easements only apply to real property.

    2. Re:Legal Analysis by dsavitsk · · Score: 1

      For posession to constitute adverse posession, it must be done in the open. Jumping on someone else's wifi where they likely do not know about it would not count. The idea in the law is that if you are on your neighbor's land and they never do anything to assert their rights (like telling you you are on their land, but that they will allow you.) It protects people who use and invest in a resource thinking they have a right to it, only to have it taken away. After 20 years, it no longer can be. This in no way applies to stealing wifi.

      I wouldn't get too excited about adverse posession as no one has gained free land that way in the last 100 years outside of a few obscure cases.

    3. Re:Legal Analysis by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1

      Except you're not using land, you're stealing service which, after 5 years, would amount to a hefty felony. Welcome to federal pound-you-in-the-ass prison boy. Stay the fuck off networks that don't belong to you. Kids these days have absolutely zero god damn respect for other people's property or services.

    4. Re:Legal Analysis by ari_j · · Score: 2

      Don't take the moderators' inability to recognize a joke as any failure to understand the law on my part. I thought the parenthetical about not asking me what I was doing in a law school classroom would convince people I wasn't serious, but I guess I was wrong. Why is it that the one time I actually gun for the zero-karma Funny mod, I get the positive-karma In* mods? :P

    5. Re:Legal Analysis by ari_j · · Score: 1

      See my reply to the up-modded sibling post. But on a side note, less jokingly, say that you did openly utilize someone's wifi for 20 years. With a sufficiently progressive court, there is an argument to be made here. (However, I personally sincerely hope there is no sufficiently progressive court for the argument to succeed.)

    6. Re:Legal Analysis by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Kids these days have absolutely zero god damn respect for other people's property or services.

      Should I get the hell off your lawn, too? ;-D

      (For the legal part, see my reply to the upmodded sibling comment.)

    7. Re:Legal Analysis by sporktoast · · Score: 1

      What with all the efforts to equate intellectual property with real property, I wonder if there may be something worthwhile in an attempt to apply the laws regarding prescriptive easements and adverse possession to patents/copyrights...

      Kinda like showing the absurdity of corporations being given the rights of persons by attempting to marry/divorce one or seeking the death penalty in a death-through-corporate-negligence case.

      --
      In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.
    8. Re:Legal Analysis by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Would my corporate wife get a tax deduction or just me?

    9. Re:Legal Analysis by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      The concept is limited only to real property because in that case the reliance interest of the leecher (or squatter) is directly noticeable to the owner. If the adverse possession is slight or unnoticeable (like an underground cave) then there is no adverse possession unless there was knowledge over the requisite years. The owner of the broadband may not know people are leeching off of him.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    10. Re:Legal Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It protects people who use and invest in a resource thinking they have a right to it, only to have it taken away.

      We need something like this for patents!

    11. Re:Legal Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at first you laugh about it,
      then you relize there is truth to it...

      why wasn't the above patent post modded +5, insighfull?

    12. Re:Legal Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but....

      In my jurisdiction prescriptive easements arise under the legal fiction of "lost modern grant".

      A right to enjoy bandwidth by access from a neighboring property appears to me to be sufficiently connected to land as to be capable of comprising an easement granted by a deed. Therefore a right by long user (usually 20 years) could arise if the deed is presumed lost.

      Check out this case for the relevant principles in the UK:

      http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld20030 4/ ldjudgmt/jd040401/bake-1.htm
      House of Lords - Bakewell Management Limited (Resondents) v. Brandwood and others (Appellants)

      Yours faithfully,

      Anonymous Coward & Associates.

    13. Re:Legal Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To continue...

      As the above case shows even illegality of use is not a bar to acquisition by lost modern grant if the illegality is capable of being cured by the fictional grant.

      The most you could expect to get, however, is the minimum grant that would enable the historical use of available bandwidth. That would, in my view, not extend to a positive covenant to provide bandwidth. In other words they might not be able to sue you for use after 20 years but they could turn off the power.

      I would suggest to those running a WiFi network who might be concerned about this that consider getting local legal advice regarding granting a limited licence to people to use bandwidth (say, for 10 minutes every month) thereby preventing continuous "adverse" use from extending for more than a month, or confine access to authorised users on their own property with appropriate security from the outset.

      Anonymous Coward & Associates (uninsured).

    14. Re:Legal Analysis by angle_slam · · Score: 1

      I think you confuse the terms real property and tangible property. Real property means land. A telephone is tangible, but not real. Intellectual property is being equated to tangible property, not real property.

    15. Re:Legal Analysis by ralatalo · · Score: 1

      I doubt you could force the next owner to pay for the service and if the provider turned it off due to non-payment I think you would lose your claim... since it would be lost by the action outside your claim.

      Though would be interesting to see if you could force the cable company to restore your cable after you had been pirating it for enough years.

    16. Re:Legal Analysis by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      The only "property" really being used is the router though.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    17. Re:Legal Analysis by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Consider this analogy (like I've stated, I would hope no court would buy this, but the analogy has to be made): wireless internet access over your neighbor's router parallels access to the highway over your neighbor's private roadway. A prescriptive easement would protect your use of your neighbor's roadway for that purpose (although if it was necessary for you to use his road to get out of your own land, there may be an implied easement at play rather than a need for one by prescription), just as it could preserve your use of your neighbor's wireless router to access the internet.

      It's a weak argument, and I hope it fails, but there are courts allowing crazier analogies than this to fly, and lawyers writing articles with more stretched analogies than this and scaring Slashdot into a frenzy.

  119. Re:Amateur Radio: Digital Packet Radio? by ari_j · · Score: 1

    Not to mention that your hand would get worn out even faster keying in Code than it does with broadband access. ;)

  120. Mod parent up, answers the question presented by ari_j · · Score: 1

    That's the single best solution I've read on this entire thread, particularly if it is not a violation of your neighbor's ISP's terms of service. There's nothing that says you can't be neighborly in exchange for a return of the favor.

  121. speed by etzel · · Score: 1

    modem speeds would be fine????? what do you use, DOS?

    --
    "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."
  122. Hey, get on my free LINKSYS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone - get on my linksys ISP - that way my sniffer can capture all the packet and ...uh

  123. Move to New Zealand by qyiet · · Score: 1

    We only have one ISP here who can sell DSL at over 256kbps. oh wait.. you wanted cheap too.. my bad.

  124. What about Todito Card? by elchavobeer · · Score: 1

    I just saw an ad during a futbol game on Azteca America for these cards that sell you dial-up internet access by the minute, kinda like the pay as you go virgin phones, no contracts, etc. I'm not sure if anyone else offers this but it's a pretty good idea. 6 bucks for 500 minutes or 15 "unlimited" days, beats having to pay for internet shops if you're on the road and don't have an ISP. http://www.toditocardusa.com/usaing/preguntas.html /

    --
    Es que se me chispotio!
  125. sbc yahoo 26.95/month by CrocketAndTubbs · · Score: 1

    sbc yahoo have been providing dsl for under 30 bucks for quite a while. Go nuts here.

  126. Always on Internet for Cheapskates by 6Realms · · Score: 1

    I'm using, Qwest DSL and it's only costing me, $15.00 a month, of course you do need some type of email service and a friend of mine only pays, $6.00. ISP/Vip has a service for around $8.00 and it supports "OutLook". I don't know much about, Tech, I've just been at it 2 yrs. What is the difference between, Broadband and DSL?

  127. What about asking for a lower price? by harryk · · Score: 1

    OK, I didn't see anyone mention this obvious peice, but it worked for me. I simply called up Time Warner customer service and advised them that I could not afford the then $45/mo subscription to Road Runner internet access, she countered (almost immediately) with asking if I would be willing to pay for the same service at a discount ... I explained that it would be hard for me to justify anything over $30/mo. She placed me on hold for a few minutes, and came back with a locked in rate of $30/mo ...

    Your miles may vary, but I've prompted a handful of friends to do the same thing, and Time Warner / RR were very quick to respond with discounts. Even if its a temporary reduction, you just call and ask them to do it again, it works quite well.

    --
    think before you write, it'll save me moderator points.
  128. Your asking us? by Game+Genie · · Score: 0, Troll

    Really how many /.'ers don't have broadband? This is the same group of people the managed to slashdot NASA.

    1. Re:Your asking us? by Game+Genie · · Score: 1

      -1: Troll? WTF, It was a joke! Lousy mods. Save you points for the GNAA or BSD is dying posts. I have good karma, I moderate fairly.

  129. Cheap DSL by verloren · · Score: 1

    You could try cheap DSL - I pay $25 per month including ISP for 256kb up/down because of the good people at usfamily, and the other people at qwest. Not super-cheap, but reasonable. Whatever your area you may well find something similar.

  130. How about?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just get a modem? You like always on "but my usage doesn't really justify paying $40-$50 each month for hundreds of kb/s when all I really do is read and write email sporadically, light web browsing and IM.".

    You like it, but you don't need it. There is already a solution for you. It is called a modem. The justification is simple, you don't need broadband, because you don't use it.

  131. If you're in the Mid-Atlantic... by b0bby · · Score: 1

    ...check out cavtel.com. I used speakeasy for years, and I was very happy with them, but I finally switched because of the cost. I was paying over $100 a month for phone (Verizon) and DSL (Speakeasy), plus a bit more to AT&T for an international plan. Cavtel does both as a package for $50 a month, and their rates for international calls are decent too (you can't choose another long distance carrier when you go with them). It was painful to switch, because Verizon won't start an order for a new carrier while another carrier is using the line, so I had to disconnect speakeasy, wait for Verizon to register that, and then sign up with cavtel - it ended up being 3 weeks without dsl, and when you're used to always on it sucks having to dial up. Cavtel is a bit slower than my Speakeasy was, but really I don't need blazing downloads, like the poster I just want a full time connection and I'd rather save the $600 a year. Plus not giving money directly to Verizon feels good.

  132. Setting up a LAN by adeydas · · Score: 1

    This is what my service provider does to lower the cost yet give always on high speed Internet. Connect two or threee computers (of different people ofcourse) into a hub and share the Net connection. Limit the download Kb/s because if you are doing a heavy download, your friends would go really slow at the same time. You can however, keep the upload bandwidth open. Secure the network and restrict access to other computers in the network (very helpful if you don't quite trust your friends). Share the cost and enjoy!

    1. Re:Setting up a LAN by ockegheim · · Score: 1

      You can however, keep the upload bandwidth open.

      I think upload speed should be limited a little. When I'm uploading with my otherwise excellent FTP programme on 256/64 ADSL, it monopolises the upload bandwidth to an extent that almost nothing else gets through on my computer or others, even HTTP requests. This is a pity because there's lots of spare download bandwidth.

      --
      I’m old enough to remember 16K of memory being described as “whopping”
  133. Buy two.... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ...of the 5$ a month dialup subscriptions and just rotate them. Actually tell the company that's why you are doing it, maybe they'll cut you some slack then on the "always on" part. 10$, still cheap.

    BTW, who has 5 clams a month for dialup?

  134. problem solved! by Master_Torrez · · Score: 1

    about 2 months ago the modem on my PC burned out for only god knows what reason. I could have replaced it with another modem but my video card takes up 2 slots and my RAID card takes up another slot and my NIC's taking up last slot. so I couldn't replace it. So I just got an old 1 gig athlon machine I had lying around and set it up to permanently dial in and set it up to always restart, always connect and all that stuff. then I just got some cat5 and ran it between the computers and presto! I know have an "always on" dialup connection. Though since I live out in the sticks it could technically be termed an "always on" dialup connection with half the speed, lol

  135. Go into business by mattr · · Score: 1

    Get a faster line and go into the nospam mail service provider business.

    You can make it a profit center!

  136. Have a Cell? by pebcak · · Score: 1

    Check what your cell phone provider offers. T-Mobile's $5/month T-Zones service (GPRS) use to provide unlimited Internet connectivity without blocking any ports. They're blocking most ports now, but 25, 110, and 143 are still open, so I can still use it to check email.

    If you can find an anonymous proxy using one of those ports, that's one way to get web browsing going. That, or if you have access to a server with a permanent Internet connection, just setup an SSH or Squid server on one of the above ports, and tunnel your traffic through it. I use the SSH technique to tunnel into a Squid server when I'm on the road.

  137. DSL for $25/month by aclarke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I bought DSL for some friends as a present for a year for $25 per month from Sonic.net. From what my friends have told me they have been very happy with the service. If you look somewhere like DSLReports.com you might find that DSL in your area costs less than you think.

  138. Shades of Monty Python.... by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    *knocks a packet off the desk*

  139. Cheap DSL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of broadband are you paying $40-50/month for? Verizon charges only $29.99/mo for residential DSL (1.5M down / 384k up) and Cavalier Telephone $25 mo for up to 4Mbps both ways. If these telcos aren't in your area, maybe some others with cheap DSL are.

  140. simple.... share your $40-$50 connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why not work with your neigbhors (who, most likely, have similar usage habits) and share a nice DSL account? If you are feeling particulary devious, just get a strong 802.11b antenna and card and just find an open AP.

  141. Simple.. by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    Don't hang up.

  142. Not really... by uncoolcentral · · Score: 1
    These days even the little guys outsource dial-up ports from the likes of Qwest, Level3, MegaPOP etc. So they're paying anywhere from 8 to 14 cents per hour.

    When you use their dial-up 24/7, you cost b/w $57 and $100 per month and only pay a fraction of that. It makes VERY little (if any) sense for any ISP to allow 24/7, unless they're facilities based, and not many are these days.

    I don't know of any.

    1. Re:Not really... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Hmm.... interesting point, and I hadn't realized that was going on so widely nowdays.

      The ISP I was referring to did have all of their own facilities in-house.

    2. Re:Not really... by uncoolcentral · · Score: 1
      The ISP biz has changed a lot lately. We closed our few remaining POPs in 2004. To keep a POP open, an ISP needs to buy PRIs, remote access servers (modems), bandwidth, backhaul connections, etc.

      Upgrading a POP isn't simple or cheap either, if you're at capacity, you have to buy another PRI (essentially a T1 truncated into 24 channels), another card for the RAS to supply those 24 ports, etc. But even though it might take you a year to fill up those facilities, you have to pay for them ALL the whole time. In rural areas, these telco services can be incredibly expensive.

      Bring the economy of scale into things, and it just makes sense for the big guys (Qwest, MegaPOP, Aleron, etc.) to set up huge POPs and charge by the hour. That's why so many ISPs can offer nationwide access these days.

      Outsourcing.

      Hence the real expense of offering true unlimited dial-up.

  143. always on by dickrichardv8 · · Score: 1

    I did almost solve that problem using Linux and a Geocities free web hosting page. A Linux dialer application called Xisp has an option to reconnect on disconnect. I used that to connect to my ISP with. If you want a constant IP number then you are fscked. I used a Linux HOWTO. It shows how to publish your constantly changing IP number to a GeoCities(or any other always on web page)by using a bash script that greps your current IP number and ftp's it to your GeoCities web page and edits the IP number variable in the page at each disconnect. I added that scrip to a "run at connect" config file in the Xisp application. If I wanted to know my ISP number for remote connection to my box I would just look at my GeoCites web page and get the current number. The HOWTO even included a sample web html text.

  144. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  145. Or 24 hours per session... by antdude · · Score: 1

    I believe EarthLink limits your Internet dial-up connection for 24 hours straight and automatically disconnects you. Then, you will have to dial-up back to get on.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  146. I take it you ment 256k Up. by infonography · · Score: 1

    Webservers and P2P aside that sort of upload sucks. For that reason I haven't gone to Speakeasy either. If I want to upload work or a large-ish datafile to a server I might as well use dialup or ISDN. ISPs pay for out going, not incoming. If I am using it for business I am gonna want both up and down. Especially if I am getting slashdotted.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  147. Re:Ug. Just Deal-Shop by The_Dougster · · Score: 1
    I used to have a second line, back before broadband hit my area. I think it amounted to something like $15 a month for the line and $10-20 for dialup service. So it was a little cheaper than broadband but not by much.

    The phone company is real good for adding all kinds of mystery fees and surcharges to your bill each month, and a second line simply doubles this.

    --
    Clickety Click ...
  148. Share and share alike. by aug24 · · Score: 1

    I have always thought that WiFi connection owners should be able to secure/encrypt their own signals, and give them 95% of bandwidth, then leave 5% unsecured for 'guests'.

    Chances are that we all would be always able to find a signal.

    Perhaps I'm just a hippy at heart ;-)

    J.

    --
    You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  149. All devices must have the same power feed. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    AC has an anger problem, but he is correct. All devices that use wire connections and are connected to computers must have the same power feed, including ground. That includes all the computers in your own house.

    It has nothing to do with a piece of paper called a license.

    The reason is that the ethernet connectors use low-voltage digital logic, which can be overwhelmed if there are differences in voltage caused by dissimilar grounds.

    "All devices" means printers, for example, and all computers that share the same wires.

    Also, don't plug a laser printer into a battery backup power supply. Laser printers draw too much power when heating.

    1. Re:All devices must have the same power feed. by harrkev · · Score: 1

      Ethernet cable runs through a transformer at the interface. So a little DC voltage between the two grounds is not a problem. As long as the voltage difference is not large enough to cause arcing (which would also be a safety problem) then this should work.

      Etherenet was DESIGNED to work in cases like this. It is not like using a parallel printer cable which is limited to 6 feet. Ethernet was designed to run 100 meters (about a football field).

      If you like copper, then go for it!

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  150. International access, too by company+nuncio · · Score: 1

    I'm able to use them here in Paris as easily as I do at home!

    --
    Of course I don't speak for my employer. My employer doesn't speak for me, either.
  151. Call your providor by Godboy_g · · Score: 1, Informative
    Actually where I live. Rogers Cable services offers four types of High speed connections.

    Ultra-Lite - 64Kbps for 19.95

    Lite - 256Kbps for 26.95

    Express - 3.0 Mbps for 44.95

    Extreme - 5.0 Mbps for 44.95 w/99.95 modem purchase

    A flavour for everyone!
    --
    I LIKE TOAST!!!
  152. Running 'Nix is like owning a Lightsaber. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make sure you don't flip the wrong switch and zap yourself in the nits.

  153. Dedicated POTS or ISDN by leandrod · · Score: 1

    In the Brazilian Southern region we have a telephony operator that gives us a second POTS line dedicated to their in-house ISP. Just dial 0, no dial tone, basic PPP authentication and you're in for a flat fee.

    If I'm not mistaken in Europe there are places with similar schemes for ISDN, where one gets digital, real 64Kbps instead of a maximum theoretical 56Kbps with analog.

    --
    Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
    DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
    GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
  154. Location, location, location by Frantactical+Fruke · · Score: 1

    I assume you don't want to hear about my broadband provider in Finland, since you kindly failed to mention even the country you're posting from.

    I somehow doubt that Welho.fi would want to string cable all the way to Centeroftheuniverse, California...

  155. I just looked at the nearest ethernet card. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    I just looked at the nearest ethernet card. The transformer is obviously designed for high frequency, so normal power line noise is not a problem.

    However, a Motorola electronics engineering handbook for power line devices that I read about 20 years ago told me to expect an "unusually high-energy spike" at least once a month. My understanding is that a spike could overload the common mode range of the ethernet interface, and possibly blow out the semiconductors that receive the signal.

    This all depends on the capacitive coupling from the primary to the secondary of the transformer. If it is properly shielded, the capacitive coupling could be zero.

    We are talking about unshielded twisted pairs (UTP) here. A shield connected on both sides, or even one side would likely have problems.

    Is what I've said here accurate? Any references?

  156. Re:Any ideas? by Moderatbastard · · Score: 0
    Yeah, I got an idea: tell us where you fucking live, imbecile.
    Now that's a tough one.

    # select name from countries where inhabitantsThinkItsEntireWorld = true
    USA returned.
    --
    1/3 of jokes get modded OT. If you get the joke, mod 1 in 3 insightful/interesting/underrated to restore karma balance.
  157. cheaper by chrisnewbie · · Score: 0

    Juste get dial-up...nothing's cheaper,,,,,,,,living in new york for wi-fi piggyback is a bit too much if you want to save money! unless i'm mistaking it's the easiest way! not doing hops and hoops for a free wi-fi in new york.

  158. The cable modem maxes at 2-3 mbps .... by willtsmith · · Score: 1

    ...
    Does it really MATTER how fast your LAN backbone is in those circumstances???

    This is of course given that you only have a few computers on your network that aren't passing VIDEO back and forth amongst themselves.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:The cable modem maxes at 2-3 mbps .... by skarphace · · Score: 1

      Yes! When I shave that 1ms response time off, it's like heaven.

      --
      Bullish Machine Tzar
  159. Re:Mod Parent +1 HILARIOUS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ROR

  160. Wireless Is A Good Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Going wireless is a good idea, and just connect to an open network.

    This is why more people need to run open networks. Imagine being able to connect to the internet anywhere in the NYC area, and as you move, simply being able to change to another access point and keep on browsing.

    If everyone took the advice of the fools saying to close your wi-fi, then this would never be a possibility. Open wireless networks are the best. Share your connection, and others will share theirs.

  161. Alarm Line by m3talsling3r · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised no one mentioned using an "alarm line" dsl system.

    For instance: http://www.experts-exchange.com/Networking/Q_21070 551.html

    --
    My sig is as boring as you...
    1. Re:Alarm Line by m3talsling3r · · Score: 1

      Also this article by an ISP that is doing it.

      --
      My sig is as boring as you...
  162. Re:Amateur Radio: Digital Packet Radio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The easy way to do this is to make the SSID your callsign.

  163. Depends where you live... by Bob+Bitchen · · Score: 1

    if you're unlucky enough to live in a place where there is a monopolistic strangelhold on bandwidth then dial up might be the way to go. (BTW what's the cheapest dial-up service these days?) You could setup a wifi bridge in your attic or on your house if you can't find a reliable signal with a wifi card. All kinds of antennas are available these days. wirelessnetworkproducts.com is at least a starting point (don't know anything about them)

    Good luck!

    --
    http://tinyurl.com/3t236
  164. Re:Any ideas? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    When 98 of the users are from the USa, what do you expect?

  165. Re:Legal Analysis - boning neighbor's wife for 5y by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if I bone the neighbor's wife for 5 years and he moves away does the new neighbor have to let me do his wife also due to this never expiring clause?

  166. Tips for Canadians by broadbandguy2005 · · Score: 1

    Another way to go in Canada, is: 1) Cancel your existing residential Cable TV or Satellite TV service. 1) Order a basic Business Cable Internet service to your home under a business name. This will be much faster than residential cable internet service (both on the upstream & downstream) at a marginally higher cost per month - say $65 monthly. When the cable installer shows up, let them know that you will be getting tv services via satellite - **and more than likely** the cable installer will leave off the filter which blocks the incoming cable TV signal. 2) Then subscribe to a low-cost VOIP provider that will allow you to transfer your old Bell landline # over to them for say $19.95 per month (say Vonage or Talkbroadband). Immediately cancel that old Bell landline. *There is an article comparing Canadian VoIP provider packages located at: http://www.canadianisp.com/cgi-bin/forums/ikonboar d.cgi?act=ST&f=22&t=1796 3)Now you have a faster High Speed Internet connection with better customer service (since it's business), a phone line with your old number, and Cable TV with 70 odd channels all for about $85 monthly. **The trick is in getting them to leave off the line filter for cable tv. As far as I know though, the installer will want to leave off the filter by default - since this oftens interferes with you getting the strongest possible signal strength for Cable Internet.

    1. Re:Tips for Canadians by broadbandguy2005 · · Score: 1

      I gotta learn how to post links, sorry, that article comparing Canadian VOIP providers and packages is located again at:

      http://www.canadianisp.com/cgi-bin/forums/ikonboar d.cgi?act=ST&f=22&t=1796

  167. Re:Any ideas? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    98%