Thank you for this. I grew up on Cape Cod (mid 70s) and there were "roundabouts" (a.k.a. rotaries) on the mainland side of both the Bourne and Sagamore bridges and on the Cape side of the Bourne bridge. Since that time, the mainland side of both bridges have been changed though the Cape side of the Bourne bridge still has a rotary.
I don't need anything outside of the IP address so that I can SSH to my machines. I don't host sites or email or anything of that nature so name resolution is unimportant.
That is unless your DSL provider is Windstream. My IP changes almost daily with no service interruptions.
It got so bad that I wrote a script that grabs my public IP every 5 minutes and scp's that to one of my servers every 5 minutes.
You make a good point unless this hack was intentional. Brilliant move by Oracle, really -- upsell Oracle DBs because MySQL will simply never be secure enough; I mean look at their own site being hacked.
As far as I know that is pretty much the case in the U.S. as well. At least the MPAA/RIAA etc... have not attempted to sue anyone (yet) based on downloads, only distribution.
I believe you may have misread the article you linked to.
From your link:
I just found a Novell press release dated November 26, 1996, which makes it *after* the October 16th, 1996 Amendment 2 was signed. Guess what it says Novell sold off to Santa Cruz? "The UnixWare product lines". I'm pretty excited about digging this up.
SCO is arguing in its Reply Brief in its appeal that Amendment 2 changed the excluded assets language of the APA so that it gave SCO the copyrights and everything:
The exclusion of all copyrights was subsequently amended in Amendment No. 2 so that copyrights "required for SCO to exercise its rights with respect to the acquisition of UNIX and UnixWare technologies" were not excluded from the sale, and thus remained within the encompassing reach of all "right, title and interest," including all "ownership" rights in UNIX and UnixWare that was sold to SCO. This appeal focuses on whether these contractual agreements, and the evidence surrounding them, properly allow a finding that none of the UNIX and UnixWare copyrights were required by SCO to exercise its rights in the UNIX and UnixWare technologies it acquired.
But here in this press release, we see what Novell told the world it sold, and once again, it was just the UnixWare business, the UnixWare product lines. No mention of UNIX at all, by the way. Let me show you the press release, because I think this knocks SCO's arguments out.
This is probably the best thing to happen to openoffice.org since the sale of Sun to Oracle. Almost all of Sun's open source projects have either been neglected (abandoned?) by Oracle or moved to a less-friendly license (OpenSolaris anyone?).
As the AC above pointed out, sipdroid is an *excellent* app. I use it with the wifi on my HTC Eris (cheezy cheap Verizon Android phone...) all the time. I don't use Skype, so I cannot comment there...
I also rooted my phone for the occasion I am out and about with my laptop and want internet access. I now have wifi tethering without costing an arm and a leg for the rare times I need it (screw you Verizon).
While that might be a good indicator of the current market (I cannot find any good statistics), Android is currently the #2 selling smartphone OS - trailing only Rim BlackBerry and surpassing iPhone sales. Being that the handheld market is extremely volatile I would not be surprised if Windows CE (or whatever it is called this week) becomes irrelevent.
Regardless of cost, you might not even be able to get business cable unless a lot has changed at Comcast. I had Comcast as a provider in northern Florida several years ago. I wanted to run my own mail and web servers and I was willing to pay the premium for "business" service to get static IPs. One would think that if I had consumer cable internet from them I would be able to upgrade that to business cable. Not so. After several hours being switched from one call center to another it was "determined" that business cable was not available in my area.
Again, this was several years ago and the situation may be different now.
As you might suspect from many of the comments in this article, KDE is currently in a huge state of flux. I have been using KDE daily for years and I have been using KDE4 daily since 4.1
The changes from 4.1 to 4.3.5, my current version, have been dramatic. I would suggest trying 4.4 as soon as it is feasibly possible. In other words, don't break your system with "testing" repositories, however once it is available in your distro mainstream you should jump on it.
"Also try xfce! its really great if you just want a clean and fast desktop environment with just the right set of features! "
Amen! I have been using KDE since the 1.x days (~'98 if memory serves). I have broken KDE in more ways than you can imagine and xfce is my "rescue" DE (ie. enough to run firefox/opera and a few terminals). I simply cannot use Gnome -- I know many folks like/love it, but to me it is torture.
For those attempting to view the slideshow on a non-windows machine, you can download the wmv file and play in mplayer (if you have the win32codecs installed).
What are you using to cluster Postgres? I have looked at a couple of options here but didn't see an open source solution that was current and able to handle multi-master synchronous replication with some sort of automatic failover.
I am not trying to troll or label you a troll. I understand the MS does not have a monopoly in the search industry while it could be argued that Google in fact does.
Regardless, MS does have a monopoly in operating systems that they have historically been willing to abuse to enter and dominate other markets. This is where, as I understand it, the antitrust issues of a monopoly come into play.
The point I was originally trying to make is that MS *is* leveraging their monopoly on operating systems to enter the search market. This is by virtue of the fact that MS has claimed (since the original antitrust suit of the late 90s and of Netscape fame) that the browser is an integral part of the operating system that cannot be removed; yet, MS' browser which dominates (one might say, "monopolizes") the browser market defaults to bing.com. The fact that MS is now *paying* companies to distance themselves from MS competition (Google) is only adding fuel to the fire.
My original response was to your statement that Google is a monopoly. That is hearsay unless you have some sort of proof otherwise. Comparing Google's dominance of the search market with MS dominance of the OS market is apples and oranges. When Google has 95%+ of the search market then a fair comparison can be made. This is not to mention that Google, to date, has not leveraged their "monopoly" position illegally to enter another market while MS has a history of just that; as is the case now.
You are correct in your definition of monopoly, however MS has been convicted of illegal monopolistic practices many times over, not only in the U.S. but Europe and Asia as well.
Google has not, to my knowledge, ever abused their market share in a monopolistic manner. I was asking for corrections on this point.
Also, Google is arguably *not* a monopoly. There has been competition in the search market since Google's inception and Google has not dominated the search market in the same manner as MS has with operating systems, AT&T has with phone service or many other historically significant monopolies have with their respective markets.
Slashdot Mirror
Thank you for this. I grew up on Cape Cod (mid 70s) and there were "roundabouts" (a.k.a. rotaries) on the mainland side of both the Bourne and Sagamore bridges and on the Cape side of the Bourne bridge. Since that time, the mainland side of both bridges have been changed though the Cape side of the Bourne bridge still has a rotary.
I don't need anything outside of the IP address so that I can SSH to my machines. I don't host sites or email or anything of that nature so name resolution is unimportant.
That is unless your DSL provider is Windstream. My IP changes almost daily with no service interruptions. It got so bad that I wrote a script that grabs my public IP every 5 minutes and scp's that to one of my servers every 5 minutes.
You make a good point unless this hack was intentional. Brilliant move by Oracle, really -- upsell Oracle DBs because MySQL will simply never be secure enough; I mean look at their own site being hacked.
Except that the authors of wine are doing a clean-room implementation -- they do not have the windows source code.
As far as I know that is pretty much the case in the U.S. as well. At least the MPAA/RIAA etc... have not attempted to sue anyone (yet) based on downloads, only distribution.
From your link:
I just found a Novell press release dated November 26, 1996, which makes it *after* the October 16th, 1996 Amendment 2 was signed. Guess what it says Novell sold off to Santa Cruz? "The UnixWare product lines". I'm pretty excited about digging this up.
SCO is arguing in its Reply Brief in its appeal that Amendment 2 changed the excluded assets language of the APA so that it gave SCO the copyrights and everything:
The exclusion of all copyrights was subsequently amended in Amendment No. 2 so that copyrights "required for SCO to exercise its rights with respect to the acquisition of UNIX and UnixWare technologies" were not excluded from the sale, and thus remained within the encompassing reach of all "right, title and interest," including all "ownership" rights in UNIX and UnixWare that was sold to SCO. This appeal focuses on whether these contractual agreements, and the evidence surrounding them, properly allow a finding that none of the UNIX and UnixWare copyrights were required by SCO to exercise its rights in the UNIX and UnixWare technologies it acquired.
But here in this press release, we see what Novell told the world it sold, and once again, it was just the UnixWare business, the UnixWare product lines. No mention of UNIX at all, by the way. Let me show you the press release, because I think this knocks SCO's arguments out.
Ahem!
This is probably the best thing to happen to openoffice.org since the sale of Sun to Oracle. Almost all of Sun's open source projects have either been neglected (abandoned?) by Oracle or moved to a less-friendly license (OpenSolaris anyone?).
As the AC above pointed out, sipdroid is an *excellent* app. I use it with the wifi on my HTC Eris (cheezy cheap Verizon Android phone...) all the time. I don't use Skype, so I cannot comment there...
I also rooted my phone for the occasion I am out and about with my laptop and want internet access. I now have wifi tethering without costing an arm and a leg for the rare times I need it (screw you Verizon).
Running Oracle on Linux isn't different from running Oracle on Solaris.
Until Oracle drops support for running its databases on Linux. Already, Oracle will not support CentOS, even though it is binary identical to RHEL.
Tabs on top makes sense. Tabs as the window's title bar doesn't.
Agreed, 100%. Now, if Mozilla would fix their damn binary builds for Linux so that my CUPS printers work again....
While that might be a good indicator of the current market (I cannot find any good statistics), Android is currently the #2 selling smartphone OS - trailing only Rim BlackBerry and surpassing iPhone sales. Being that the handheld market is extremely volatile I would not be surprised if Windows CE (or whatever it is called this week) becomes irrelevent.
Regardless of cost, you might not even be able to get business cable unless a lot has changed at Comcast. I had Comcast as a provider in northern Florida several years ago. I wanted to run my own mail and web servers and I was willing to pay the premium for "business" service to get static IPs. One would think that if I had consumer cable internet from them I would be able to upgrade that to business cable. Not so. After several hours being switched from one call center to another it was "determined" that business cable was not available in my area.
Again, this was several years ago and the situation may be different now.
I cannot comment on German or Spanish prisons, but your knowledge of Japanese prisons is lacking at best.
As you might suspect from many of the comments in this article, KDE is currently in a huge state of flux. I have been using KDE daily for years and I have been using KDE4 daily since 4.1
The changes from 4.1 to 4.3.5, my current version, have been dramatic. I would suggest trying 4.4 as soon as it is feasibly possible. In other words, don't break your system with "testing" repositories, however once it is available in your distro mainstream you should jump on it.
Just my $0.02
"Also try xfce! its really great if you just want a clean and fast desktop environment with just the right set of features! "
Amen! I have been using KDE since the 1.x days (~'98 if memory serves). I have broken KDE in more ways than you can imagine and xfce is my "rescue" DE (ie. enough to run firefox/opera and a few terminals). I simply cannot use Gnome -- I know many folks like/love it, but to me it is torture.
For those attempting to view the slideshow on a non-windows machine, you can download the wmv file and play in mplayer (if you have the win32codecs installed).
What are you using to cluster Postgres? I have looked at a couple of options here but didn't see an open source solution that was current and able to handle multi-master synchronous replication with some sort of automatic failover.
Thanks for your response!
No offense, but maybe you should not have cast yourself in the lead role?
I am not trying to troll or label you a troll. I understand the MS does not have a monopoly in the search industry while it could be argued that Google in fact does.
Regardless, MS does have a monopoly in operating systems that they have historically been willing to abuse to enter and dominate other markets. This is where, as I understand it, the antitrust issues of a monopoly come into play.
The point I was originally trying to make is that MS *is* leveraging their monopoly on operating systems to enter the search market. This is by virtue of the fact that MS has claimed (since the original antitrust suit of the late 90s and of Netscape fame) that the browser is an integral part of the operating system that cannot be removed; yet, MS' browser which dominates (one might say, "monopolizes") the browser market defaults to bing.com. The fact that MS is now *paying* companies to distance themselves from MS competition (Google) is only adding fuel to the fire.
My original response was to your statement that Google is a monopoly. That is hearsay unless you have some sort of proof otherwise. Comparing Google's dominance of the search market with MS dominance of the OS market is apples and oranges. When Google has 95%+ of the search market then a fair comparison can be made. This is not to mention that Google, to date, has not leveraged their "monopoly" position illegally to enter another market while MS has a history of just that; as is the case now.
You are correct in your definition of monopoly, however MS has been convicted of illegal monopolistic practices many times over, not only in the U.S. but Europe and Asia as well.
Google has not, to my knowledge, ever abused their market share in a monopolistic manner. I was asking for corrections on this point.
Also, Google is arguably *not* a monopoly. There has been competition in the search market since Google's inception and Google has not dominated the search market in the same manner as MS has with operating systems, AT&T has with phone service or many other historically significant monopolies have with their respective markets.
And Google was convicted of this exactly when? I am sure that you must have some credible sources for such a statement made with such conviction.
So... where did MS get the money to pay off News Corp...? XBOX? Live.com? Oh... wait....
Aaaahhh, of course! I just knew I was missing something! :D