You dont have proof we landed on the moon just like you dont have proof that flying saucers exist,
Pictures and Video are not proof. I also do not think its wise to blindly trust the government, this includes NASA. Come to your own conclusions, if you think its a realistic possibility that flying saucers exist than they exist. I think its a realistitc possibility that they exist, whos making them is debateable, but I believe the pictures and video footage, I also dont believe millions of people would lie.
You cannot have it both ways...
Just because it's the government -- it doesn't mean it's out to get you.
Just because millions believe, doesn't make it a fact. Take religion for example.
Sounds to me like Air Canada has lazy employees... I'm always moved if I ask, when I fly in the States. My experince flying European airlines, on the other hand, has been more spotty. More than once I was told by one Spanish Iberia airlines emplyee that the flight was booked and there's nothing she could do, while another one just one terminal down would move me to sit next to my companion. I always write if off as American "Customer is always right" attitude, versus seemingly European, "I'm just doing my job, move along."
there's a debate that comes up once in a while about backing data to media... The debate is whether the devices to read the data from the media in the distant future will be avaible -- and if not, what the best way to do it. I hear it all the time whenever people do time capsules. I think this list, hoax or not, shows that people will figure out how to decode what ever we come up with -- with today's technology, or tomorrows.
Yea... I definitly disagree... 1. With faster more efficient description comes faster, more power encription, yes? 2. It's not like these type of computers will hit the market at $1k a piece and every 16 year old will drag their dady to buy one for them just so they can be the next big hacker? By the time the price comes down to affordable consumer levels like it did with current computers, all the important encription will be changed accordingly... Just a thought.
"Still, quantum computers may never be general-purpose computing devices and are more likely to be targeted at massive number-crunching problems like encryption and decryption, searches of huge databases and simulations of quantum physical states."
Isn't that what they said about the first computers in the 60s? Just a thought.
Slashdot Mirror
You must be a Colbert fan. Hope that feeling came from the gut.
Fight Club. The violence from movie stands out in my memory much more clearly than the book's.
You cannot have it both ways...
Just because it's the government -- it doesn't mean it's out to get you.
Just because millions believe, doesn't make it a fact. Take religion for example.
Sounds to me like Air Canada has lazy employees... I'm always moved if I ask, when I fly in the States. My experince flying European airlines, on the other hand, has been more spotty. More than once I was told by one Spanish Iberia airlines emplyee that the flight was booked and there's nothing she could do, while another one just one terminal down would move me to sit next to my companion. I always write if off as American "Customer is always right" attitude, versus seemingly European, "I'm just doing my job, move along."
there's a debate that comes up once in a while about backing data to media... The debate is whether the devices to read the data from the media in the distant future will be avaible -- and if not, what the best way to do it. I hear it all the time whenever people do time capsules. I think this list, hoax or not, shows that people will figure out how to decode what ever we come up with -- with today's technology, or tomorrows.
Check out the pictures on this page:e ms God aims for the rear right of the car each time. What gives?
http://www.nyrockman.com/peekskill.htm
Se
Yea... I definitly disagree... 1. With faster more efficient description comes faster, more power encription, yes? 2. It's not like these type of computers will hit the market at $1k a piece and every 16 year old will drag their dady to buy one for them just so they can be the next big hacker? By the time the price comes down to affordable consumer levels like it did with current computers, all the important encription will be changed accordingly...
Just a thought.
"Still, quantum computers may never be general-purpose computing devices and are more likely to be targeted at massive number-crunching problems like encryption and decryption, searches of huge databases and simulations of quantum physical states."
Isn't that what they said about the first computers in the 60s? Just a thought.