The truth is that the tax per gigabyte for cell phones will be different from the tax per gigabyte for memory cards which, in turn, will also be different from the tax per gigabyte for hard drives. It will be 0.02 euro for hard drives but, for cellphones, it will actually be 0.50 euro (really, 50 cents) per gigabyte.
The problem was the presumption that I'm criminalizing anything when I just made a question about a property of a substance. I don't do chocolate, coffee or tobacco because I chose not to. I'm not a fan of any of them. Not because I'm a puritan, which I'm not, those are simply stuff out of the list of things that I do.
I didn't even complain about any taxes. I didn't blindly reject any kind of pleasure the world has to offer. And I did not impose anything on anyone. I just made a (so I thought) funny comment about those three substances and in return I got a speach about complaints on taxes and asking me if I condemn the consumption of chocolate, tobacco or coffee. I didn't even express any opinion about marijuana or any kind of substance at all. So, yes, the comment made by the AC was ridiculous. And yours just went further in that direction when you implied that I was trying to impose behaviours or opinions on others. It was never, even remotely, the case.
Not being ironic or sarcastic here, not even defending your president's answer, just an honest question: is marijuana really proved to be totally non-addictive? Or is it something still up for debate and research?
I would but just realized the website has been taken offline for being under remodelling. Bad timing. It's a Linux system builder. Recent stuff, still very fresh and the most significant application so far has been on gambling machines.
for a while now, that I've been seeing that due to the highly boken patent system the only to fight these assholes is doing it using their own weapons. I've been doing my part.
Slashdot Mirror
you know he actually never really said that, don't you?
The truth is that the tax per gigabyte for cell phones will be different from the tax per gigabyte for memory cards which, in turn, will also be different from the tax per gigabyte for hard drives. It will be 0.02 euro for hard drives but, for cellphones, it will actually be 0.50 euro (really, 50 cents) per gigabyte.
In Portugal you can just text a specific number and you know how long it will take the few next buses to arrive.
Apple sure does like to patent stuff they didn't invent.
Quite the answer I was aiming for, here. I have to agree with you.
I'm just asking. Trying to get informed. Nothing more.
There's more to life than chocolate...
http://wwwdelivery.superstock.com/WI/223/1848/PreviewComp/SuperStock_1848-119945.jpg
Thank you. Someone ought to mod you informative.
The problem was the presumption that I'm criminalizing anything when I just made a question about a property of a substance. I don't do chocolate, coffee or tobacco because I chose not to. I'm not a fan of any of them. Not because I'm a puritan, which I'm not, those are simply stuff out of the list of things that I do.
I didn't even complain about any taxes. I didn't blindly reject any kind of pleasure the world has to offer. And I did not impose anything on anyone. I just made a (so I thought) funny comment about those three substances and in return I got a speach about complaints on taxes and asking me if I condemn the consumption of chocolate, tobacco or coffee. I didn't even express any opinion about marijuana or any kind of substance at all. So, yes, the comment made by the AC was ridiculous. And yours just went further in that direction when you implied that I was trying to impose behaviours or opinions on others. It was never, even remotely, the case.
No, it's just how context flows. If I ask about something, I expect a reply about that. It is because I want to know about what I asked. Period.
Sir, you don't even deserve an answer.
I'm giving you this sarcasm instead.
But then again neither is smoking tobacco, drinking alcohol, or chocolate for that matter.
I woudn't know. I don't do any of that stuff either.
That answer seems to be a bit misdirected...
Well, it's about that when I'm asking precisely about that because it was what the parent of my comment asked about.
Not being ironic or sarcastic here, not even defending your president's answer, just an honest question: is marijuana really proved to be totally non-addictive? Or is it something still up for debate and research?
I would but just realized the website has been taken offline for being under remodelling. Bad timing. It's a Linux system builder. Recent stuff, still very fresh and the most significant application so far has been on gambling machines.
Or Mulk.
no, but those were all already pirated to death.
... is that the quantity of movies even worth watching is decreasing by the minute, let alone the quantity of movies that might be worth pirating.
for a while now, that I've been seeing that due to the highly boken patent system the only to fight these assholes is doing it using their own weapons. I've been doing my part.
No, I'm under a sonambulism spell, since at this very moment, House is off in my country.
I don't. I hibernate the whole time between House episodes.
That would be a very cool way to make spoilers.
yay for /.'s lag that made me think I forgot to press submit...
A few seasons ago...