Two US patents have already been granted for true (Turing) language-simulation AI -- not that flaky neural net approach... #6587846 & #7236963... More at http://www.emotionchip.net
http://www.ethicalvalues.com
Inventors BEWARE !! The Fed Gov't typically will not pay to use your patent -- You have to sue in Fed. Court...
Thank you for your comments on my recently issued ethical AI patent...
Perhaps a little of my background would be in order. I am not an expert in the IT field, being an independent researcher with a master's degree in counseling psychology. Sometimes, however, the best cross pollination comes from outside the field. Along these lines, I was granted a patent for ethical AI and thought there might be applications to a general purpose AI assistant. The ethical safeguards allow one to trust this assistant implictly in daily matters. I have found that proprietary control is typically required to attract the venture capital and R&D necessary to implement. I also only applied for patent rights in my native country, the rest of the world is free to run with the concept as they see fit.. This new system is actually more than just an ethical hierarcy, but an elaborate process of 31 distinct steps of information processing necessary to produce the AI simulation, as shown in the Master Diagram link below:
www.angelfire.com/rnb/fairhaven/pat-diag ram.html
I would like to appeal to the AI community to seriously evaluate this new system for these kind of the applications to the project. The patent is mostly diagrams, with the text really amounting to about 12 pages in a Journal style format. The complete specification, along with diagrams, is posted at: www.ethicalvalues.com Also, a master diagram of 408 ethical terms is posted at: www.angelfire.com/rnb/fairhaven/Masterdiagram.html
Should this invention truly hold potential, I would greatly appreciate collaborating in this regard. I would deeply appreciate an evaluation from experts within the field. Sincerely John E. LaMuth
I am the inventor of record for ethical AI and have had a blast reading all your opinions. I have laughed out-loud reading many of the other hysterical responses...
I want to reassure everyone that this patent is the real deal. It is just that the formal patent format does not encourage laying-out all of the background supportive details. My reasons for patenting are to give this invention a fair chance to be widely implemented - for no major corporations are going to invest R&D in a public domain endeavor... The future is here now!
John E. LaMuth
I am the inventor of record and I appreciate your opinions. I have laughed out-loud reading the many other hysterical responses...
I want to reassure everyone that this patent is the real deal. It is just that the formal patent format does not encourage laying-out all of the background supportive details. My reasons for patenting are to give this invention a fair chance to be widely implemented - for no major corporations are going to invest R&D in a public domain endeavor... The future is here now!
John E. LaMuth
I am the inventor of record and I appreciate your balanced judgement. I have laughed out-loud reading the many other hysterical responses...
I want to reassure everyone that this patent is the real deal. It is just that the formal patent format does not encourage laying-out all of the background supportive details. My reasons for patenting is to give this invention a fair chance to be more widely implemented - for no major corporations are going to invest R&D in a public domain endeavor... The future is here now!
John E. LaMuth
Slashdot Mirror
Two US patents have already been granted for true (Turing) language-simulation AI -- not that flaky neural net approach ... #6587846 & #7236963 ...
More at
http://www.emotionchip.net
http://www.ethicalvalues.com
Inventors BEWARE !! The Fed Gov't typically will not pay to use your patent -- You have to sue in Fed. Court...
JLM
Greetings All,
m .html
Thank you for your comments on my recently issued ethical AI patent...
Perhaps a little of my background would be in order. I am not an expert in the IT field, being an independent researcher with a master's degree in counseling psychology. Sometimes, however, the best cross pollination comes from outside the field.
Along these lines, I was granted a patent for ethical AI and thought there might be applications to a general purpose AI assistant. The ethical safeguards allow one to trust this assistant implictly in daily matters. I have found that proprietary control is typically required to attract the venture capital and R&D necessary to implement. I also only applied for patent rights in my native country, the rest of the world is free to run with the concept as they see fit..
This new system is actually more than just an ethical hierarcy,
but an elaborate process of 31 distinct
steps of information processing necessary
to produce the AI simulation, as shown in the
Master Diagram link below:
www.angelfire.com/rnb/fairhaven/pat-diag ram.html
I would like to appeal to the AI community to seriously evaluate this new system for these kind of the applications to the project. The patent is mostly diagrams, with the text really amounting to about 12 pages in a Journal style format. The complete specification, along with diagrams, is posted at:
www.ethicalvalues.com
Also, a master diagram of 408 ethical terms is posted at:
www.angelfire.com/rnb/fairhaven/Masterdiagra
Should this invention truly hold potential, I would greatly appreciate collaborating in this regard. I would deeply appreciate an evaluation from experts within the field.
Sincerely
John E. LaMuth
www.ethicalvalues.com
www.charactervalu es.com
I am the inventor of record for ethical AI and have had a blast reading all your opinions. I have laughed out-loud reading many of the other hysterical responses... I want to reassure everyone that this patent is the real deal. It is just that the formal patent format does not encourage laying-out all of the background supportive details. My reasons for patenting are to give this invention a fair chance to be widely implemented - for no major corporations are going to invest R&D in a public domain endeavor... The future is here now! John E. LaMuth
I am the inventor of record and I appreciate your opinions. I have laughed out-loud reading the many other hysterical responses... I want to reassure everyone that this patent is the real deal. It is just that the formal patent format does not encourage laying-out all of the background supportive details. My reasons for patenting are to give this invention a fair chance to be widely implemented - for no major corporations are going to invest R&D in a public domain endeavor... The future is here now! John E. LaMuth
I am the inventor of record and I appreciate your balanced judgement. I have laughed out-loud reading the many other hysterical responses... I want to reassure everyone that this patent is the real deal. It is just that the formal patent format does not encourage laying-out all of the background supportive details. My reasons for patenting is to give this invention a fair chance to be more widely implemented - for no major corporations are going to invest R&D in a public domain endeavor... The future is here now! John E. LaMuth