It's not difficult, change the people who make the laws.
Learn what you potential future politicians actually have done in the past and stop listening to the bullshit that spews from their mouths and campaigns.
Vote out these life time politicians.
Stop sitting on your lazy ass and make an actual effort instead of whining that it doesn't matter.
Apathy changes nothing.
The president DOES NOT MAKE LAWS, so stop giving him all your attention and vote for specific people in congress. Next time around, vote them out when the lie to you.
The one thing I've learned by following Scaled Composites over the last decade, they aren't going to make this affordable. I doubt they'll achieve their goal anytime soon if ever. They seem to have stalled out, progress is ridiculously slow. Very disappointing.
Elon Musk seems to be doing things far faster as far as commercial spaceflight goes.
Black neighborhood behind my house is worth 10 times as much as the houses in mine (used to be mostly white when I moved, fairly well mixed now, no complaints its a great neighborhood, and my neighbors aren't stuck up pretentious pricks).... Zimmerman isn't white.
Whites get in trouble for using things like 'the n-word'... can't even say or write it without being a racist fuck... yet Dave Chappelle, the ignorant fuck, gets a free ride for calling the citizens of Hartford Cn 'crackers' because he couldn't take a heckling... best part... there were (are? Maybe more hispanic by now) more black crackers than whites. They are simply cowboys in Florida with a loud whip they use to heard cattle.
The guy was put in jail for telling his clients to LIE ABOUT BEATING THE POLYGRAPH, not for teaching them how to beat it.
Free speech has nothing to do with this, he was telling clients to commit fraud against the government in job interviews. You're more or less an idiot if you think thats okay.
There are perfectly legal channels to do what you want to do. He was intentionally avoiding those channels in exchange for teaching people to do something (perfectly fine imo) including lie on government job interviews (not fine, for anyone or any job really)
First, outside of slashdot, no one gives a fuck about unlocking, just accept it, you do not represent the general public.
Second, they weren't going for cheap, contrary to what the might have you believe. There are ready made solutions that cost less than you could do it for parts alone with a rasp pi.
Publicity with geek buzz words seems far more like the goal here.
The cost of a raspberry pi, ANY sort of wireless connection and ANY camera alone are going to exceed the cost of ready made wildlife camera.
He'll the local sporting goods store sells wifi enabled animal cams for well under $100. You'd want something other than wifi for ranges needed on the savanna, but I can't imagine asking a manufacture for a deal in exchange for publicity wouldn't have resulted in a far better solution for less money and certainly far less total cost.
Stop trying to shoehorn a raspberry pi into every space. This is a shitty hack.
It's a really good solution! It protects privacy, it's supported/maintained by really smart people who want to protect privacy, and (when using the most current version) gives the user strong privacy.
No, it doesn't, can you not read the title of the web browser you're using? Ignorance is exactly WHY its a shitty solution to the problem. People think it magically makes them safe when it does no such thing.
Who cares who else uses Tor? Who cares whether it creates protocol problems? Who cares whether pedophiles or botnets use the system?
Lots of sensible people. Those same people are smart enough not to put private shit on the Internet int he first place, which you clearly seem to ignorant to do. What kind of stupid response is this crap? Do you like spam? You want to use a network thats so plugged up with various forms of spam that you can't get a packet through to a useful host?
Tor won't solve your privacy problems, you think broadcasting them on a public network is a good idea. No amount of software will prevent you from doing stupid shit to give away all of your privacy.
The important bit, the one that has value to *me*, is that it can hide my identity.
There is no 'astroturfing' here, just your ignorance. Its not hiding you, you just don't get it yet.
Why are you using Tor for online banking? They already know who you are.
Everything you've listed as being private except online banking doesn't belong on the Internet. If you're hiding your self from your bank, there are so many other fucked up things in your world that continuing to reply is clearly a waste of time.
If you don't want people to know those things, Tor isn't the solution. Not putting it on a public network in the first place is.
Tor is a shitty solution because of ignorant statements by ignorant people like you. If you want privacy, get a clue and act like it.
Am I supposed to be impressed at your reply? Did I hit a nerve?
I said nothing about people who want privacy.
I'm a firm believer in privacy, I'm not just no so retarded that I use PUBLIC NETWORKS for PRIVACY and then bitch about it.
You're ignorant of well known and cited reports about Tor usage.
Tor is a shitty solution to wanting privacy. Instead of ranting and ruffling around trying to look cool on slashdot perhaps you should get off your ass and act in that place called 'the real world' and stop voting for assholes who erode our privacy in far more damaging ways.
My new status? Whats that, I'm a foe of some douche on slashdot, OMG I'M GONNA GO CRY NOW. Seriously, grow up, get a clue, get out of your fucking moms basement and do something in the real world, judging by your UID you're what... 40ish and you're still to stupid to realize that you have no privacy on a public network?
You utterly fail to understand why you have no privacy in the first place, you want to broadcast to strangers... in secret.
For fucks sake, Tor was designed by the fucking US military, how stupid do you have to be to not realize they planned for ahead for dealing with public usage?
If you don't want people on the Internet to know shit about you... don't use the Internet and publish shit you don't want people to know on it. Its that simple.
I have plenty I don't want people to know, and you know what... YOU WON'T FIND IT ON THE INTERNET.
The Internet is a public network for many things, this silly fantasy you have about hiding is just that, a silly fantasy. You were NEVER anonymous on the Internet, you have ALWAYS been logged, you just aren't smart enough to realize it.
I make no effort to hide my self online, I just don't put the shit I don't want people to know anywhere near it. Its that simple.
Do you understand what communication is? Do you understand that the Internet is a communications medium... the WHOLE POINT IS TO SHARE INFORMATION.
I made no mention of that retarded 'nothing to hide nothing to fear' crap, you did. You should be directing your energies towards getting a clue rather than telling me that a public network is meant as a place to hide.
Your anxiety issues can be treated, the Internet is not proper treatment, you're hiding and making your own problem worse. You use the Internet as a crutch. Man up and fucking go see a damn doctor and stop being such a coward.
pedophiles and botnets... no one uses Tor that matters.
Sorry guys, Tor is designed to be used in all the ways we've spent years trying to fix broken internet protocols from doing, you really need to stop drooling over it. Its not actually a good solution. It is in fact an absolutely shitty solution to the problem, as its really a way to create a bunch of new ones.
No, not anywhere close. There is nothing on the planet that competes with RDP for remote access. Your statements show that you are truly ignorant of the world around you.
The CAs' public keys come with your browser (or SSL client, it could be a web server or other piece of software). If you sign your own the problem becomes to distribute the keys.
Problem? Stop using shitty OSes, both Windows and OSX have no problem distributing certs to internal machines using their own CAs. Microsoft solved this issue in the 90s, OSX didn't come around till a bit later, but OSX server has no problem distributing to OSX clients either.
What's so difficult to understand? You can't comprehend that some women like sex as much as men?
I've never met a woman who knows what a proper orgasm is who didn't love sex as well. plenty of women who haven't been properly pleasures don't like it, sure. Not ones who have had a good orgasm though.
Perhaps your view is skewed do to your own issues. And before you respond, just because you can jackhammer her for an hour, doesn't mean any part of it was good. 9 out of 10 women would rather have a good quickly than an hour that just makes them sore and disappointed.
To go a step further, having the private key after the session handshake doesn't do you any good either. You have to participate, NOT WATCH, the handshake in order to know the actual encryption key used for the session.
If I had every private key in the world right now, it would do me no good in decrypting any SSL sessions I recorded. The certificate is simply used to authenticate who is on the other end, it does nothing with the encryption key negotiation process which requires you to be part of the conversation, actively participating in it, not just watching it.
The actual keys used to encrypt the session are generated on each end based on the numbers sent during the initial exchange, but neither side ever fully sends or provides enough information to determine the key.
Its all very complicated math, but the end result is that a private key is only useful for impersonating a host, not decrypting the session. They become useful because you can do a man in the middle attack where you pretend to be the real 'me' and so I don't know that I'm negotiating encryption keys with the wrong person.
Slashdot Mirror
Stop voting for these fucking politicians.
It's not difficult, change the people who make the laws.
Learn what you potential future politicians actually have done in the past and stop listening to the bullshit that spews from their mouths and campaigns.
Vote out these life time politicians.
Stop sitting on your lazy ass and make an actual effort instead of whining that it doesn't matter.
Apathy changes nothing.
The president DOES NOT MAKE LAWS, so stop giving him all your attention and vote for specific people in congress. Next time around, vote them out when the lie to you.
The one thing I've learned by following Scaled Composites over the last decade, they aren't going to make this affordable. I doubt they'll achieve their goal anytime soon if ever. They seem to have stalled out, progress is ridiculously slow. Very disappointing.
Elon Musk seems to be doing things far faster as far as commercial spaceflight goes.
Black neighborhood behind my house is worth 10 times as much as the houses in mine (used to be mostly white when I moved, fairly well mixed now, no complaints its a great neighborhood, and my neighbors aren't stuck up pretentious pricks). ... Zimmerman isn't white.
Whites get in trouble for using things like 'the n-word' ... can't even say or write it without being a racist fuck ... yet Dave Chappelle, the ignorant fuck, gets a free ride for calling the citizens of Hartford Cn 'crackers' because he couldn't take a heckling ... best part ... there were (are? Maybe more hispanic by now) more black crackers than whites. They are simply cowboys in Florida with a loud whip they use to heard cattle.
Ignorance is ignorance.
plenty of pale redheads
They're called Irish.
Anywhere there are difference among people, tribalism happens. Pretending its a US problem just shows your prejudice.
Which makes Trayvon the aggressor, not the defender.
Fact: Stand your ground wasn't even brought up by the defense team as it didn't apply. Basic self defense laws did.
Zimmerman is a douche who killed a kid, but the kid wasn't innocent. Read the court transcripts before you run off at the mouth of ignorance.
And you don't have any idea what existing wildlife cameras are available.
The guy was put in jail for telling his clients to LIE ABOUT BEATING THE POLYGRAPH, not for teaching them how to beat it.
Free speech has nothing to do with this, he was telling clients to commit fraud against the government in job interviews. You're more or less an idiot if you think thats okay.
You do realize that no court of law considers a polygraph admissible ... right?
If the government doesn't want to hire you, they don't need to frame you on a polygraph.
You need to stop watching so much Law and Order or whatever silly show you got the idea from.
Nether of those 'tricks' have ever worked unless the examiner wasn't even looking at the machine output ...
I.E. You're an idiot.
There are perfectly legal channels to do what you want to do. He was intentionally avoiding those channels in exchange for teaching people to do something (perfectly fine imo) including lie on government job interviews (not fine, for anyone or any job really)
Funny, I thought the point of an art project was ... art.
The exact same way.
Are you trying to start a race riot?
First, outside of slashdot, no one gives a fuck about unlocking, just accept it, you do not represent the general public.
Second, they weren't going for cheap, contrary to what the might have you believe. There are ready made solutions that cost less than you could do it for parts alone with a rasp pi.
Publicity with geek buzz words seems far more like the goal here.
The cost of a raspberry pi, ANY sort of wireless connection and ANY camera alone are going to exceed the cost of ready made wildlife camera.
He'll the local sporting goods store sells wifi enabled animal cams for well under $100. You'd want something other than wifi for ranges needed on the savanna, but I can't imagine asking a manufacture for a deal in exchange for publicity wouldn't have resulted in a far better solution for less money and certainly far less total cost.
Stop trying to shoehorn a raspberry pi into every space. This is a shitty hack.
It's a really good solution! It protects privacy, it's supported/maintained by really smart people who want to protect privacy, and (when using the most current version) gives the user strong privacy.
No, it doesn't, can you not read the title of the web browser you're using? Ignorance is exactly WHY its a shitty solution to the problem. People think it magically makes them safe when it does no such thing.
Who cares who else uses Tor? Who cares whether it creates protocol problems? Who cares whether pedophiles or botnets use the system?
Lots of sensible people. Those same people are smart enough not to put private shit on the Internet int he first place, which you clearly seem to ignorant to do. What kind of stupid response is this crap? Do you like spam? You want to use a network thats so plugged up with various forms of spam that you can't get a packet through to a useful host?
Tor won't solve your privacy problems, you think broadcasting them on a public network is a good idea. No amount of software will prevent you from doing stupid shit to give away all of your privacy.
The important bit, the one that has value to *me*, is that it can hide my identity.
There is no 'astroturfing' here, just your ignorance. Its not hiding you, you just don't get it yet.
Why are you using Tor for online banking? They already know who you are.
Everything you've listed as being private except online banking doesn't belong on the Internet. If you're hiding your self from your bank, there are so many other fucked up things in your world that continuing to reply is clearly a waste of time.
If you don't want people to know those things, Tor isn't the solution. Not putting it on a public network in the first place is.
Tor is a shitty solution because of ignorant statements by ignorant people like you. If you want privacy, get a clue and act like it.
Am I supposed to be impressed at your reply? Did I hit a nerve?
I said nothing about people who want privacy.
I'm a firm believer in privacy, I'm not just no so retarded that I use PUBLIC NETWORKS for PRIVACY and then bitch about it.
You're ignorant of well known and cited reports about Tor usage.
Tor is a shitty solution to wanting privacy. Instead of ranting and ruffling around trying to look cool on slashdot perhaps you should get off your ass and act in that place called 'the real world' and stop voting for assholes who erode our privacy in far more damaging ways.
My new status? Whats that, I'm a foe of some douche on slashdot, OMG I'M GONNA GO CRY NOW. Seriously, grow up, get a clue, get out of your fucking moms basement and do something in the real world, judging by your UID you're what ... 40ish and you're still to stupid to realize that you have no privacy on a public network?
You utterly fail to understand why you have no privacy in the first place, you want to broadcast to strangers ... in secret.
For fucks sake, Tor was designed by the fucking US military, how stupid do you have to be to not realize they planned for ahead for dealing with public usage?
If you don't want people on the Internet to know shit about you ... don't use the Internet and publish shit you don't want people to know on it. Its that simple.
I have plenty I don't want people to know, and you know what ... YOU WON'T FIND IT ON THE INTERNET.
The Internet is a public network for many things, this silly fantasy you have about hiding is just that, a silly fantasy. You were NEVER anonymous on the Internet, you have ALWAYS been logged, you just aren't smart enough to realize it.
I make no effort to hide my self online, I just don't put the shit I don't want people to know anywhere near it. Its that simple.
Do you understand what communication is? Do you understand that the Internet is a communications medium ... the WHOLE POINT IS TO SHARE INFORMATION.
I made no mention of that retarded 'nothing to hide nothing to fear' crap, you did. You should be directing your energies towards getting a clue rather than telling me that a public network is meant as a place to hide.
Your anxiety issues can be treated, the Internet is not proper treatment, you're hiding and making your own problem worse. You use the Internet as a crutch. Man up and fucking go see a damn doctor and stop being such a coward.
pedophiles and botnets ... no one uses Tor that matters.
Sorry guys, Tor is designed to be used in all the ways we've spent years trying to fix broken internet protocols from doing, you really need to stop drooling over it. Its not actually a good solution. It is in fact an absolutely shitty solution to the problem, as its really a way to create a bunch of new ones.
If you have to hide, the Internet isn't for you.
Parallels is head and shoulders over RDP? ...
No, not anywhere close. There is nothing on the planet that competes with RDP for remote access. Your statements show that you are truly ignorant of the world around you.
Try again shill.
*rdp includes citrix
That's one possible way to interpret that sentence, but only if you use the non-technical (particularly military) meaning of the word "compromise".
And what you're doing is attempting to be a pedantic asshole.
No one cares about your silly narrow definition of the word.
The CAs' public keys come with your browser (or SSL client, it could be a web server or other piece of software). If you sign your own the problem becomes to distribute the keys.
Problem? Stop using shitty OSes, both Windows and OSX have no problem distributing certs to internal machines using their own CAs. Microsoft solved this issue in the 90s, OSX didn't come around till a bit later, but OSX server has no problem distributing to OSX clients either.
What's so difficult to understand? You can't comprehend that some women like sex as much as men?
I've never met a woman who knows what a proper orgasm is who didn't love sex as well. plenty of women who haven't been properly pleasures don't like it, sure. Not ones who have had a good orgasm though.
Perhaps your view is skewed do to your own issues. And before you respond, just because you can jackhammer her for an hour, doesn't mean any part of it was good. 9 out of 10 women would rather have a good quickly than an hour that just makes them sore and disappointed.
To go a step further, having the private key after the session handshake doesn't do you any good either. You have to participate, NOT WATCH, the handshake in order to know the actual encryption key used for the session.
If I had every private key in the world right now, it would do me no good in decrypting any SSL sessions I recorded. The certificate is simply used to authenticate who is on the other end, it does nothing with the encryption key negotiation process which requires you to be part of the conversation, actively participating in it, not just watching it.
The actual keys used to encrypt the session are generated on each end based on the numbers sent during the initial exchange, but neither side ever fully sends or provides enough information to determine the key.
Its all very complicated math, but the end result is that a private key is only useful for impersonating a host, not decrypting the session. They become useful because you can do a man in the middle attack where you pretend to be the real 'me' and so I don't know that I'm negotiating encryption keys with the wrong person.