What?! They are encrypted? Oh, that's too bad.
What's that? You want the decryption key? Oh yeah, I lost that darn thing right after I generated the key pair.
Guess you're going to have to brute force all 512 bits yourself.
You may not realize, but in a MS webcast it was revealed that MS uses CA's eTrust applications to secure their network. So if the MS-SCO relationship is true, this would make CA's purchase of SCO's license understandable.
What?! They are encrypted? Oh, that's too bad. What's that? You want the decryption key? Oh yeah, I lost that darn thing right after I generated the key pair. Guess you're going to have to brute force all 512 bits yourself.
First, read my post. Second, try using their products. It won't take long to find out how unrespectable they are.
You may not realize, but in a MS webcast it was revealed that MS uses CA's eTrust applications to secure their network. So if the MS-SCO relationship is true, this would make CA's purchase of SCO's license understandable.