> It's filled with frothing-at-the-mouth types who think anyone disagreeing with them is pure evil.
What you're describing is not coming from LGBT its coming from so-called liberalism, It just so happens that many (if not most) LGBTs are also liberals.
except it absolutely does. For example you can't just call yourself an engineer in Germany, its a title you have to "earn" by paying for accreditation.
You're making the fundamental mistake in assuming business people have vision beyond the immediate next dollar or care about others/society enough to do anything to even slightly risk that. Its pretty obvious that modern business practice is to even hurt themselves in the long term if it gives them another dollar now. Nearly all management types view that as a problem they, or more likely someone else, can deal with later when it hits. Actually very like the way the US government is handling (or more accurately, not) environmental change.
It is perfectly well documented that Hillary has in fact broken the law and has thus far at least, gotten away scott free with it.
If someone simply pointing out facts equates in your mind to that person having personal failings and insecurities, then it's 100% clear that you only need to look in the mirror to see where the real and significant mental issues actually lie.
> Jesus fucking Christ you're fucking dumb. It's well known he hates her. Its also well-known that he hates Trump and in fact anything American, but you Liberal morons just can't handle that because the truth undermines your whole rabid conspiracy rant.
> we might say they really care about what will happen.
We might. Or we might say this is just yet another variant of embrace,extend,extinguish.that's been Microsoft's core strategy since MSDOS.
> they might even fork That would be the dumbest idea ever because no-one with an actual clue would take their fork as seriously as the "real" Linux, but nothing would surprise me when dealing with Microsoft or the clueless management types that keep buying/deploying their products.
So your whole argument for adding another critical depdency on a known untrustworthy company plus all the extra issues associated with now having all your most important shit in the cloud, is just because you're basically too lazy manage a few boxes and deal with what even you describe as very very very rare HW problems? wow.
>>...scientists are seriously considering the possibility of "de-extincting" the Carolina parakeet, America's only native parrot, which became extinct 100 years ago.
No it didn't. It was simply stunned, and pining for the fjords.
I totally agree with you however the US government are clearly on a full-out insane charge towards self-driving cars, regardless of the actual fact that no piece of software will ever be able to fully understand the massive complexity that is every possible circumstance the real world.
Self-driving cars based on current technology are not and will never be better than a good driver. The laws should never have been relaxed enough to allow self-driving cars on public roads in the first place. If the government really are concerned about safety, what they really need to do is ensure drivers are properly educated (not the joke driving test we have now) and remove licences from bad drivers.
I predict that the verdict will be "accidental death" or "death by misadventure" or something equally ambiguous, simply because the courts won't want to set a legal precedent that in any way impedes the government's insane rush toward their ultimate goal of removing everyone's freedom to drive themselves.
> My girlfriend was happily walking directly in front of cars on any streets sub 20mph
Totally agree. As a Brit now living in AZ, the behaviour where many here apparently think its perfectly fine to just step into the road right in front of moving cars boggles my mind.
I can't imagine what happens when they go anywhere else and try that. In England it's called "natural selection".
Slashdot Mirror
Finland already tried it and it failed.
https://yro.slashdot.org/story...
Unless your job is to automate your own job, you have zero control over that and very little basis to make that claim.
The only interesting thing here Is that the director of the CIA is so out of touch he's still using AOL for his primary email address.
> It's filled with frothing-at-the-mouth types who think anyone disagreeing with them is pure evil.
What you're describing is not coming from LGBT its coming from so-called liberalism, It just so happens that many (if not most) LGBTs are also liberals.
Ask Finland.
http://fortune.com/2018/04/19/...
> this would never happen in Germany
except it absolutely does. For example you can't just call yourself an engineer in Germany, its a title you have to "earn" by paying for accreditation.
You're making the fundamental mistake in assuming business people have vision beyond the immediate next dollar or care about others/society enough to do anything to even slightly risk that.
Its pretty obvious that modern business practice is to even hurt themselves in the long term if it gives them another dollar now. Nearly all management types view that as a problem they, or more likely someone else, can deal with later when it hits.
Actually very like the way the US government is handling (or more accurately, not) environmental change.
the rush of high definition 8 track players that are sure to follow....
It is perfectly well documented that Hillary has in fact broken the law and has thus far at least, gotten away scott free with it.
If someone simply pointing out facts equates in your mind to that person having personal failings and insecurities, then it's 100% clear that you only need to look in the mirror to see where the real and significant mental issues actually lie.
By your standards, the Attorney general must be a tinfoil fucknut too then.
https://www.politico.com/story...
> Jesus fucking Christ you're fucking dumb. It's well known he hates her.
Its also well-known that he hates Trump and in fact anything American, but you Liberal morons just can't handle that because the truth undermines your whole rabid conspiracy rant.
>> Republican lead Congress
Like this you mean? :https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/13/sessions-special-counsel-clinton-uranium-244867
> Unfortunately, not all crimes go punished...
Yeah just look at Hillary as a perfect example.
Awesome lol I wish I had mod points.
> we might say they really care about what will happen.
We might. Or we might say this is just yet another variant of embrace,extend,extinguish.that's been Microsoft's core strategy since MSDOS.
> they might even fork
That would be the dumbest idea ever because no-one with an actual clue would take their fork as seriously as the "real" Linux, but nothing would surprise me when dealing with Microsoft or the clueless management types that keep buying/deploying their products.
Anybody that knows this and still has a Facebook app on their phone deserves everything they get.
Magic leap has zero dependency on raytracing.
So your whole argument for adding another critical depdency on a known untrustworthy company plus all the extra issues associated with now having all your most important shit in the cloud, is just because you're basically too lazy manage a few boxes and deal with what even you describe as very very very rare HW problems? wow.
.
>> ...scientists are seriously considering the possibility of "de-extincting" the Carolina parakeet, America's only native parrot, which became extinct 100 years ago.
No it didn't. It was simply stunned, and pining for the fjords.
>> "I can't see proof of a negative ever arising from future studies," Melnick says.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
the coffee makers hadn't presented the proper grounds... ..badum tshhhhh....
Its ALWAYS the bit-part actor in the red shirt that doesn't come back from the away missions.
Actually pedestrians have right of way, even when they're testing the boundaries of natural selection.
I totally agree with you however the US government are clearly on a full-out insane charge towards self-driving cars, regardless of the actual fact that no piece of software will ever be able to fully understand the massive complexity that is every possible circumstance the real world.
Self-driving cars based on current technology are not and will never be better than a good driver. The laws should never have been relaxed enough to allow self-driving cars on public roads in the first place. If the government really are concerned about safety, what they really need to do is ensure drivers are properly educated (not the joke driving test we have now) and remove licences from bad drivers.
I predict that the verdict will be "accidental death" or "death by misadventure" or something equally ambiguous, simply because the courts won't want to set a legal precedent that in any way impedes the government's insane rush toward their ultimate goal of removing everyone's freedom to drive themselves.
Replacing bad drivers with fundamentally incapable technology is not a sane solution.
> My girlfriend was happily walking directly in front of cars on any streets sub 20mph
Totally agree. As a Brit now living in AZ, the behaviour where many here apparently think its perfectly fine to just step into the road right in front of moving cars boggles my mind.
I can't imagine what happens when they go anywhere else and try that. In England it's called "natural selection".