Slashdot Mirror


User: Wombat2k

Wombat2k's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
6
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 6

  1. Re:Time for a ethics of dying on Why People Don't Live Past 114 · · Score: 1

    This is pretty close to the plot of "Old mans war". After a certain age you can volenteer to join the armed forces.

  2. Re:coolio! on Ocean Energy Tech To Be Tested Off Australian Coast · · Score: 1

    Shorry about that. it`s the chilli. Gives me an endorphin rush

  3. Re:Show us the evidence of evolution! on Teachers Back Away From Evolution In Class · · Score: 1

    You might want to check out the book "The greatest show on earth" by Richard Dawkins. It`s a short summary of all the evidence for evolution.

  4. Comedy gold on Erasing Objects From Video In Real Time · · Score: 1

    For anyone not wearing augmented reality goggles.

  5. Re:geek rapture on William Gibson Gives Up on the Future · · Score: 1

    Also "Newton`s wake" by Ken MacLeod. A funny and thought provoking novel about those left behind after the hard rapture. Meet the combat archeologists. When you are investigating tech abandoned in the first few seconds of singularity best to carry a plasma rifle.

  6. Re:Why stress this out? on Police Given Access to Congestion-Charge Cameras · · Score: 2, Informative

    The UK uses ANPR for this too. Here you have to get home office type approval for a camera to perform a specific function. Data must be deleted ASAP if no offence can be proved. An ANPR speed camera must remove any non-offending data as soon as possible. A surveillance camera connected to the PNC must delete data within 48 hours unless the plate is black listed. The congestion charging cameras can only transmit a hashed VRM and can only store data if an offence happened. ( so it is possible to track backwards a vehicle with a known numberplate). A camera that is used outside it`s approved function cannot provide admissible evidence. I know of only two times when the police used ANPR data outside of it`s defined spec. Once when a WPC was shot in Bradford and recently when there was an attempted bombing. The police need to act quickly if they need to use a type approved device outside it`s designed function. The new law makes it faster for the police to gain access when they need to. Stressing this out is required because there are a lot more cameras here. The UK has laws that protect against data being kept for longer than is needed. I can understand the home office reaction that police might need access to ANPR cameras that might have security concerns...BUT it`s good to keep an eye on them in case of abuse.