I very much agree with the parent post.
As to how respected CSM is -- have a look at:
"Christian Science Monitor admits using forged documents against antiwar British MP Galloway"
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/jul2003/gall-j05 .shtml
Designing for Netscape 4.x is a major PITA. It's a no-no if you want to design using web standards without using hacks...
Hacks spoil it all I guess...
SharpDevelop looks cool: cool gui, integrated NUnit, cool TaskList..
Importing VSNET2003 solutions worked OK, except few problems with embedded resources... I have high hopes for SharpDevelop. VSNET is still better but has shitty upgrade cycle - so we'll see what the future brings.:-)
Yes, what's up with that? I followed the 'cookbook' migration but I guess I messed up along the way, because when I decided to delete old Mozilla profile (250MB), Thunderbird fell apart. Of course, it's my fault, but it just pissed me off and I ditched Thunderbird for a later time... maybe when Mozilla mail migration comes up..
Slashdot Mirror
I very much agree with the parent post. As to how respected CSM is -- have a look at: "Christian Science Monitor admits using forged documents against antiwar British MP Galloway" http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/jul2003/gall-j05 .shtml
Designing for Netscape 4.x is a major PITA. It's a no-no if you want to design using web standards without using hacks... Hacks spoil it all I guess...
SharpDevelop looks cool: cool gui, integrated NUnit, cool TaskList.. Importing VSNET2003 solutions worked OK, except few problems with embedded resources... I have high hopes for SharpDevelop. VSNET is still better but has shitty upgrade cycle - so we'll see what the future brings. :-)
Yes, what's up with that? I followed the 'cookbook' migration but I guess I messed up along the way, because when I decided to delete old Mozilla profile (250MB), Thunderbird fell apart. Of course, it's my fault, but it just pissed me off and I ditched Thunderbird for a later time... maybe when Mozilla mail migration comes up..