Slashdot Mirror
Firefox 1.0 Released
New Here writes "November 9 has arrived and with it comes Firefox 1.0. According to its home page, Firefox empowers you to browse faster, more safely, and more efficiently than with any other browser. I'm New Here, but this Firefox does sound very promising! Firefox 1.0 is available now for Windows, Linux, and Mac from the mozilla.org ftp server."
Running 1.0 right now. Seems to work great!
I wonder how long the mozilla ftp will last :)
I'm writing this in firefox. It rocks. Internet Explorer sucks. When will Microsfoft learn?
;)
Now, on to business- New Here's posting record rocks, check it out
No way really?
FoxyTunes is an amazing extension that allows you to control your music right from the browser,/
http://www.iosart.com/foxytunes/firefox
Adblock filters out any unwanted advertisements,
http://adblock.mozdev.org/
And many many more!!!
People must be having problems accessing Mozilla.org so, here's a mirror list where you could get Firefox 1.0. http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/mirrors.ht ml
Mozilla.org is really getting hammered. Try waiting a few hours for the mirrors to update.
Here is a Google cache of the Firefox Mirror List.
I've managed to download a copy and order a t-shirt and the site isn't slashdotted yet. What are you all asleep or something?
[signature]
Torrents mirrored here: http://firefoxfah.sourceforge.net/fftorrent.html
Now it's time to install it in my high school ;)
Why should I switch from Mozilla to Firefox?
Thanks cmdrtaco. Failed to link to mirrors as usual.
Mod this up if you think Taco is an asshole.
Blearf. Blearf, I say.
Mirrors:
s es/1.0 a ses/1.0/ e fox/releases/ / releases/1.0/ i refox/releases/
l eases/1.0/win32/en-US/Firefox%20Setup%201.0.exe.to rrent
http://64.12.168.21/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/relea
http://207.200.85.49/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/rele
http://trillian.cc.gatech.edu/pub/mozilla.org/fir
http://mozilla.osuosl.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox
http://mozilla.ussg.indiana.edu/pub/mozilla.org/f
Official Torrent:
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/re
http://almostsmart.com
Hey,
Anyone got a scan of the Ad in the New York times? My name is in there as I sponsored.
Want to thank again the folks at Mozilla for making Firefox. Great Job!
Thanks!
I love me some Firefox. This is easily the best free product to come out yet. No ads too!
Got it 5 hours ago.
The new homepage points to http://www.google.com/firefox. Fire your conspiracy theories at will...
0daymeme.com: Great stuff.
I'm in New Zealand - got it already and running it happily. It's my birthday, I've just been playing Halo 2, Firefox is out, and today I'm buying a house. Things can't get much better :)
..last week! everyone should jump on this bandwagon too. A pity we weren't voting for browsers last week
It was already running incredibly slowly BEFORE slashdot posted the article.
--- Ãther SPOON!
Your extensions will be disabled unless they are configured as compatible with 1.0. Unfortunately right now trying to use the built in "search for updates" feature is very slow, from server load I presume. I found updates for several of my favorites by searching http://www.mozdev.org/.
Or at least I hope so, even if IE fights back a tiny ammount we'll see a huge lot of improvements in the web generally, IE is so often the 'lowest common denominator' when it comes to designing for the web.
But for usability and speed of use I'd go with Firefox any day.
Since the initial inception, I have been a user of this browser, and I have used every release, and many nightlies inbetween. I have tried other browser, but I have always returned.
So it's a great day that it's not release as 1.0
Yay!
Jason Lotito
It's nice to see Firefox reach this milestone. Hopefully it will see 2.0 as well.
well done Mozilla on a fantastic milestone. If you can achive soooo much at version 1.0 - imagine what you can get by the giddy heights of version 6.01 of IE ? :)
Get everyone you know onto this ASAP! The sooner we can rid the word of poor quality non-conforming and insecure browsers the better the www will be for all....!
before it gets hammered too badly:
linux i686 torrent
win32 torrent
(both EN-US).
For now, at least: ftpmoz.newaol.com/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases /1.0/
Anyone know if the New York Times ad went through? Is it available to view anywhere?
You sure can't beat that OS built-in goodness.
Yummy
- This and all my posts are public domain. I am a Physicist. I am not your Physicist. This is not Physically advice
New browser takes on Microsoft. Pretty fair coverage IMHO.
An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
Did I miss something or was the possibility to load links in the tabs in the background lost?
It was working in PR1 at least...
Hey!, It's been November 9th for 23 hours here in Australia, and finally Firefox 1.0 is out!... (Still happy with Opera though).
New Here writes "November 9 has arrived...
...
:)
I'm New Here, but this Firefox does sound very promising!
---
Made me chuckle. I wonder how many people got it
Sailors. Oh man!
For the Europeans: http://www.mozilla-europe.org/en/products/firefox/
Donkey:
OS X Will rule this world
Windows Exe
tar.gz
I will work to elevate you, just enough to bring you down
I installed 1.0 on my Compaq laptop, and I'm a bit dissapointed. Firefox starts, but then immediately freezes. The problem is not there in 0.9.1.
Anyone else has this problem? I can't convince the folks here at work to switch away from IE if my firefox doesn't work.
I reckon it's some old extensions/profiles/what-have-we, but I've uninstalled firefox completely (and used google desktop search to remove all files that has the words "firefox" or "mozilla" in them) and still - if I install 1.0 again, the same problem appears. It launches fine, but when I try to do anything, it freezes.
Underholdning.info
ftp://mozilla.isc.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/rele ases/1.0/ r efox/releases/1.0/ e fox/releases/1.0/ e ases/1.0/win32/en-US/Firefox%20Setup%201.0.exe.tor rent
ftp://mozilla.ussg.indiana.edu/pub/mozilla.org/fi
ftp://mozilla.oregonstate.edu/pub/mozilla.org/fir
Official mozilla.org torrent for Win32:
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/rel
When the Grauniad and the BBC report this story hours before it appears on Slashdot, you know something's wrong with the world.
Every post seems to be based around the pun with his name. Little more than a troll or crapflooder - surely there must have been more deserving submitters to actually go to the front page?
The Fedora 3 release would beat this to /.
(end of boring post)
-- Mod me down. I am not a karma tart. ffs,gag
Its a bit frustrating the Website Content is still old (as always). The download Javascript Tool points still to Firefox 1.0PR since months :-/
btw: I don't like the current Website. Its difficult to find more specific information about other Mozilla Projects.
anywhere?
Linux
firefox-1.0.installer.tar.gz.torrent
firefox-1.0.tar.gz.torrent
Windows
Firefox Setup 1.0.exe.torrent
Firefox 1.0.zip.torrent
Mac
Full download no torrent available
See the bbc story
Nice to see Firefox is getting the press it deserves
Jaj
Bad form to reply to my own post, but some more useful links here:
Windows torrent and executable.
Linux torrents for installer and tarball.
NO! NO IT ISN'T! IT ISN'T SOME SORT OF RECORD AT ALL!
Why is it that with every fucking story, some fart knocking simpleton must, without fucking fail, post "Duh, most be some kind of record!" as though Slashdotting a site is a rare occurance. You're on Slashdot! Sites that get linked from Slashdot, get Slashdotted! It's happened to thousands of sites before, it isn't a fucking record when it happens exactly the same the 1001'st time, you moron!
Now just fuck off.
Congrats!
Anyone that mentions that thing from M$ in this thread should be shot in the foot. This is the day of the fox, not mammon. Biyatch-aah!
I've posted some more interesting news and Mozilla developer blog links and a screenshot of the new Firefox Google search interface on my blog:
inside aebrahim's head - firefox 1.0 is here!
Well I'm reading this in Firefox 1.0 and it *still* doesn't like slashdot's code. It still occasionally renders the comments overlapping the left hand menu and it initially rendered this "post comment" screen double width - with the left hand menu titles taking up my entire screen. I haven't encountered any problems with any other sites, so I expect it's just slashdots dubious HTML that's confusing firefox. Mind you I hate to admit that I've never seen IE mis-render slashdot.
Has anyone else seen Firefox render slashdot incorrectly?
It can usually be fixed with a simple click of the reload button (F5).
Next desire, native SVG support so FireFox wins the enterprise space before Longhorn even gets to market.
We have two years.
Please make sure that you uninstall any previous Firefox version before installing FireFox 1.0, as it could create some problems with the older version. Just trying to help out fellow slashdotters and hoping in the process that someone would dump some mod points on me.
Hey, it's a record. Get over it.
http://google.com/firefox
shame the amazon,ebay,yahoo search plugins come as standard, nothing like giving the big boys more leverage
No wonder I can't get the latest Thunderbird.
Mozilla.org doesn't respond, so I check slashdot. Sure enough..
You KNOW they're going to get a file, why not just link to a torrent?
"I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
but it's all in French... (Le File, L'Edit...)
If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
For an open source browser, this is having a fairly major impact on society at large. As a case in point, The Guardian (the UKs major left leaning / liberal newspaper) had a major editorial on the subject today, which can be read here (in today's print edition as well as online)
As a longtime corporate Linux user, I have to say that nothing has made this more possible than having a good OS browser such as Mozilla and Firefox, kudos to both.
Just installed in an hour ago. While everything looks nice and polished, unfortunately the Slashdot rendering bug is still present :(
They did backport some support for IE-only JavaScript features from the 1.8 branch though (but that was also in the RC's, I think).
Thought I would help the cause...Win32 zip torrent
http://www.jiggybyte.com/dl/FireFox10.torrent
It either times out (95% of the time) or gives me a message saying that there are no updates available. Given the latter message, I gather that I'll probably have to update manually. It's really no biggie but it would be nice if they made the "auto update" thing work. I have a bunch of 1.0 PRs running here (as in three or four dozen or so) and it would be nice to not have to roll out the update myself. (Disclaimer: I don't really maintain these machines. This is just volunteer work. I know how to do centralized software rollouts but these are not my machines.)
Ha-ha. I LOVE YOU MAN!
Damn that was funny...
K-Meleon is a Gecko-based browser for Windows without the XUL bloat in Mozilla/Firefox. It's much faster, though a bit dated now (but a new version is coming out soon).
The BBC now has an article on this.
Obviously so do lots of other sites
There seem to be a lot of FireFox related articles on slashdot and after the release of 1.0 it will only increase. So how about a new FireFox topic in the submit stories section of slashdot with the cool looking FireFox logo?
The Europe site of Mozilla.org seems to work fast:
/ releases/1.0/
http://ftp.eu.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox
Help out grassroots advocacy for Firefox @ Spread Firefox. This is the community that organised the NYTimes add.
The site seems to be down so here is the Google cache and the Corel link.
Not that I understand why anyone *wouldn't* want the search box (not actually related to google, it's just a search box that can access several differet search engines) but it's easy to remove:
1) Right click on it
2) Select Customize
3) Drag the search box off the toolbar onto the dialog.
Simple and takes less time than posting a mindless rant on slashdot.
Well, you can get Mozilla, although that's even worse in terms of built-in features. You don't have to use the search bar in Firefox (although it's damn handy - having 20 different targets, from wikipedia.org to google.com, is a great way to set up your browser.) In fact, you can remove the search bar completely, by customizing your browser layout.
What are the top 10 reasons to use FF over IE? I'll start:
1. Security
Any really good arguments here?
2. Standards
Open standards ensure that independent vendors can compete on fair grounds. The W3C is the de facto standards body for internet standards. Firefox is implemented from the ground up based on those standards. Standard compliant websites will show in any browsers (on any platform) that also complies to the standards, and not just in a specific browser with its own standard.
3. Extensibility
Different users have different needs. For most, the normal Firefox distribution has all required features. For some, a specific extra feature is of considerable value. Firefox has support for plugin's, which is small custom components of code that can deliver near any functionality.
4. Reliability
In firefox, what you see is what you get. No hidden agendas, no spy-ware installing behind your back.
5. Comfort
Do you remember how the internet was a few years back when there were no annoying pop-up's and you didn't have to worry about spyware installing on your machine behind your back? With Firefox, you can once again realize that blissful sensation of using the Internet.
6. Continuity
Firefox is not going to stop innovating at 1.0 or whenever it has market dominance. Firefox is here to stay, and to keep evolving.
7. Slickness
Firefox has stunning looks and sleek controls. You can download a theme with a few clicks, or you can create your own. Firefox is hot, Internet Explorer is not.
8. For the people, by the people
Microsoft is not your friend. Firefox, like much open source software, is built for the people, by the people. You'll find that Firefox is surrounded by an enthusiastic community of supporters, not big business. Firefox, like other Open Source Software, is built, maintained and supported by people who believe in sharing, cooperation, and community.
9. ?
10.?
Unable to read configuration file '/bigassraid/htdig//conf/14229.conf'
Geocrawler error message.
If you download one of the nightly builds, you'll see it's actually fixed in the "trunk," but not in the "branch" 1.0 came from, because it apparently caused too many other flaky reactions.
bug 264913
bug 217527
The good news is that Slashdot WORKS again in the nightlies. If you really want, you can grab a nightly build here and check it out for yourself. They are generally pretty stable, but thy sometimes f with your extensions.
Skip straight to Thunderbird on Mozilla's FTP server then ;)
:)
What about the automobile? You only use it to get from one place to another right? Doesn't matter what it looks like, how it runs, if the locks work, etc.
I think the reason people care is that its the app used for hours and hours every day. At least i do for work, and for fun. Anything people use that much, they notice all the little things (along w/big things), and often want to improve or customize.
Is this browser compatible with banking sites?
What do servers see this browser as? (Netscape?)
Is it really faster than Safari in Mac OS X?
Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
You mean, they should all get together and make themselves equal in size? :-)
Or was that meant to be, "commence?"
ObOnTopicComment: Yes, Firefox is darned good. You should try it.
Unfortunately Firefox 1 also comes with a number of 'improvements' that are rather dubious. The two that I personally dislike are:
/ Or chidaceae_coauthoring.htm
1. The 'default plugin' which used to be a dynamic library called something like 'libnullplugin.so' is now statically linked in, which means that you can't just remove it. What it does is nag the you every bloody time you go to a page that wants to display something that requires a plugin; these plugins are used intensively in adverts, which is why I don't have them.
2. There has always been a way to search in the displayed page - go to 'Edit -> Find in This Page' in the menu, or press CtlF. In earlier versions you had to press the 'Find Next' button in the search dialog in order to start the search. In Firefox 1.0 the search happens as you type. Some people like it, apparently, but to me it is incredibly disruptive. There are situations where you definitely don't want this functionality; one such is if you, like me, feel it hard to concentrate on the dialog box when the background moves. Another, rather lengthy example is the following:
Assume that you work with a big text that contains a large number of complicated words, like eg (WARNING: its huge):
http://flora.huh.harvard.edu/china/mss/volume25
This is a botanical text about orchids in China, and it is full of exotic names. Let's say that you have found 'Hemipilia kwangsiensis', and you want to find other occurrences of 'kwangsiensis'. If you are like me, you press CtlF, type the word (none of this mouse stuff for me if I can avoid it) and press [Return]. Except that the wods you are looking for disappears as soon as you start typing, and now you have the problem of finding the original place in a text of about 900 pages printed. And all that just to be cool. It would definitely have been nice with an option that could turn it off.
Apart from that it is a good browser; definitely better than IE. I can recommend v.0.9
It 's shame !
Don't be fooled ! Why you must keep Internet Explorer at all cost
Ploum.net.
I was thinking, since Mozilla is trying to get more recognized and look more professional, having the website go down when a new release comes out is kind of bad. Perhaps when they come out with a new release they should put it up for download before announcing it. That way Mozilla enthusiasts can get their copy first and Slashdot the site, before the general public comes to the site. This way it takes the hit off of the site when the unknowing people visit.
Think about the average Joe. He's see this news story about a great new browser, but when he goes to the site, it doesn't work. That really takes a lot out of the hype. When he hears about a new IE or AOL "release" the site is always up.
I don't understand why Mozilla is ignoring the suite. It's a great product and is widely used. I personally have been seriously using the suite since about 0.6 and I can't understand why everyone's gone against it. If you have even 256 MB RAM it's fast. Yes it does take longer than IE to load up, but I start up Moz when I start my PC and don't close it until I shut down.
I think it's sad the development of the suite has really slowed now.
reuters article: http://reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=internet News&storyID=6755158
I'm new here. How do you post a comment without replying to a comment? I couldn't seem to figure it out. Thanks.
Some of us require browsers for work - web developers, researchers, IT people. Firefox contributes GREATLY to producitivity: tabbed browsing with middle click background-opening is unmatched in IE. It makes google'ing 10 times faster.
Plus, it's so much easier as an IT manager, because IE is a friggin magnet for shit - people end up with so much junk on their computer that DOES come from IE. Exploits are written for IE, and IE is more flawed than any other browser and the security fixes take longer than any other browser.
Maybe you SHOULD care!
Sorry guys, links looked good in the preview...
1 C4D9 896262CC000192539DE6F78B|h=CYYNX6K3MPDYKBDO6XXWUAI YLRQ6LDJX|/
g z|8623151| 2483EB0809FCB84E61A8A7B593B683B4|h=6A3USOY3P76D7UZ 676LBQ6JT4JORPTWT|/
1 8270|F0E 220FE61CA221F6AF1632E0CC613C7|h=NV3FC2UYQUI2XBD2RK 4XBCM2I46GAAKB|/
Text only Donkey:
OS X:
ed2k://|file|Firefox%201.0.dmg.gz|9058286|963
Linux:
ed2k://|file|firefox-1.0.installer.tar.
Win:
ed2k://|file|Firefox%20Setup%201.0.exe|49
I will work to elevate you, just enough to bring you down
It's not really a "Google search bar" :|. It's an all purpose search box that you can use for pretty much any search engine out there. All it does really is take your input and put it in the right places in a URL to perform a search.
Quite a handy tool really.
According to the front page of mozilla.org, Firefox 1.0 was released on the 8th. Lucky for me I got it before the BBC and Slashdot noticed.....
Suuuuure, first install the spyware you didn't want in the first place because it came attached to this neato program, then uninstall the spyware. Riiiiight.
I tell ya what, I'll just mindlessly skip installing the neato program.
The Mozilla/Firefox folks have forgotten why most of us switched to Moz/Fire in the first place: we wanted a simple browser that didn't have all those plug-ins that IE had, and could block images and popups.
And if I want to search the internet using Google, I'll type in www.google.com in the address box!
have you ever clicked the damn google logo? it's not just a damn google-only bar. it's pretty damn handy if you ask me, and I don't consider it 'fluff'.
Try to remove your old profile. You can export your bookmarks first and reimport them later on.
... and you find
a bunch of unrelated tiny urls!
Anyone got any idea why ?
Also if you search from firefox - you get a different page from Internet Explorer. Check out the firefox url for the above search.
_________________________________________________ Intresting SIG
Please people, use the mirrors or the mozilla.org ftp redirect. The plugin finder is suffering from the slashdotting and massive surge in traffic. We don't want to drive people away as the first thing they experience is problems finding/updating their extensions/themes.
l eases/
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/re
[alk]
For those too lazy to find it, or having trouble reaching Mozz.org
r eleases/1.0/mac/en-US/Firefox%201.0.dmg.gz
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/
We'll have to agree to disagree on the damn Google bar; I'll call it unnecessary fluff, you can call it handy.
I am a Firefox uses since it was 0.3. I am sorry to say but the update to 1.0 was a downgrade.
:-(
:-( Maybe they fixed it on the 1.0 release.
Middle click doesn't work any more. Most of my extensions are disabled. I might revert back to 0.8
By the way, does anyone know if they fixed the long standing Mac OS X bug with middle clicking ? Middle click "Open in new tab" option is the central feature of FireFox and it is not working on Mac. What a shame.
Spyware? What spyware? That's not the google search bar, it's just a text box that accepts input and sends it to google (or yahoo,amazon,dictionary.com, ebay or creative commons, depending on what option you choose) as a search query.
Congratulations!
Here's to an excellent release that shows what the power of open source and community effort can really accomplish. Well done!
Using the executable installer to install to the path of my existing Firefox installation (PR1) resulted in the browser's shell completely flaking out when the browser was eventually launched. No start page would load. The Bookmarks menu was empty (clicking on Manage Bookmarks and then returning to the Bookmarks menu solved this). Visiting web pages didn't seem to affect the interface whatsoever (i.e.: no active back button, no loading page animation, no updating of location bar, etc.). In general, the shell seemed disconnected from the application itself.
A normal uninstall, followed by a re-install did not solve the problem. Files were left in the install directory and, when prompted, I chose to wipe out the entire directory. Only after performing a complete uninstall (completely deleting the install path, but preserving the profiles) and reinstalling did Firefox work properly. Your mileage may vary, but I hope this isn't a widespread problem, as a 1.0 release isn't the time for screwups like this.
Might I have been doing something wrong? Installing a new version to the old path seems to be a a well-supported idiom, as I've been doing that for ages without problems with all manners of programs.
It's OK, nobody says you MUST use it. If phishing and virii doesn't bother you don't change... Keep with m$'s crap and keep surfing...
Is to /. their servers! Go team!
--
Anyone who's installed 1.0 will have noticed that Firefox is now using a start page hosted by Google. But you'll be glad to know that if you don't use google.com because you'd rather use Google in your own language or perhaps you like the option to easily search sites in your own country, then you can easily change the start page so that it uses a start page designed for your country by just appending /firefox to the normal address of your preferred Google home page:
For instance, if you're in the UK, set your start page to:
http://www.google.co.uk/firefox
Or if you're in France:
http://www.google.fr/firefox
Apologies for the repost, but it seems this will be noted over and over again:
If you download one of the nightly builds, you'll see it's actually fixed in the "trunk," but not in the "branch" 1.0 came from, because it apparently caused too many other flaky reactions.
bug 264913
bug 217527
The good news is that Slashdot WORKS again in the nightlies. If you really want, you can grab a nightly build here and check it out for yourself. They are generally pretty stable, but thy sometimes f with your extensions.
Slashdot always renders fine in Firefox, and I've been using it for about a year. Maybe you guys have really slow or really fast computers/connections?
http://kmeleon.sourceforge.net/forum/read.php?f=2& i=3460&t=3460
Based on Mozilla, open source, and 10 times better than Firefox in my opinion. They're looking for volunteers, too.
I just installed Firefox today, and being a Mozilla user there's one thing that firefox doesn't do that mozilla does that I've grown accustomed with.
In Mozilla, you could hide the sidebar by clicking in the middle of the edge of the sidebar. In Firefox they removed that and now to close the bar you have to click on the X
similar to how IE handles them. It also seems that you cannot merge sidebars, such as the history and favorites, so you can't view them both at the same time.
Is there a theme or a way to return that functionality in firefox short of rewriting the whole thing?
In Soviet Russia, Trojan exploits YOU!
just FYI: the DNS entry for ftp.mozilla.org hsa several IP Adresses all around (the world), so just using ftp.mozilla.org will get you a random mirror
The IP adresses are (if you want a specific mirror): 207.200.85.49, 64.12.168.21, 64.12.168.243, 130.207.108.135, 131.188.3.71, 140.211.166.134, 156.56.247.196, 204.152.184.113, 207.12,6.111.216,207.126.111.217, 207.126.111.218, 207.126.111.219, 207.126.111.220, 207.126.111.221, 207.126.111.222, 207.126.111.223, 207.126.111.224
Try opening the following microsoft support link in firefox. It fails saying unable to connect. But it works in IE.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/293631/EN-US/
Ok, so 1.0 is out. I guess that means that the feature freeze is over, and focus will switch to development again. This is good.
Personally, I am all for making it cleaner, leaner and faster. Browsing speed has improved since it forked from Mozilla, but there's still room for more improvement. Also, it crashes once in a while, takes a long time to launch, and eats a fair bit of memory. Keep up the good work, and make it even better.
One idea would be to modularize more aggressively. I would imagine that splitting off JavaScript and XUL support can reduce the footprint quite a bit. Configuration, bookmarks, history, password management, etc. could probably go in a separate module, too.
Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
-- Serge K. Keller
Haven't used firefox for a while (last one was 0.7), but has that utterly annoying 'feature' with the profile selection window (that appears when you already have a firefox window open and try to open another one from your menu) finally been kicked out by default?
I know that with some scripts (there are about 397 versions of it, and just a few work nicely), you can get rid of it. But this schould be turned of by default.
Firefox 1.0 and Halo2 all in one day? What more could a geek want?
Now if only some kind soul would build it for Mac OS 9... I could use it at work too.
it's a good thing, because it means there is a lot of interest. If even 1/4 of the people who haven't heard about it before that visit the site try firefox and 1/4 of those keep it, it will still be a nice big boost for firefox and a bigger papercut to IE. now if I can just get them to use it at work...
I have nothing witty to fill this space with yet.
http://filemirrors.com/search.src?file=Firefox%20S etup%201.0.exe&size=4918270
I've followed the Grauniad and BBC stories on Firefox 1.0's release, and both link to the default mozilla homepage. However, that page is still links 1.0PR for download - wouldn't it be a good idea to update the page that *most* of the world is linking to?
No it doesn't. The Googlebar is an extention you need to install.
It does come with a general search, that is usually set to Google by default. If you click on the little arrow you can search with Yahoo, Amazon and others. Choose "Add engine" and you can put just about any seatch engine in. It just does search not all the other stuff the Googlebar does.
IE has something similar, View > Explorer Bar > Search, unsuprisingly it uses MSN and isn't as easy to change. I'm pretty sure you will find Mozilla, Opera and Safari have a search function somewhere too.
This isn't 'fluff' it is a standard part of any modern browser. If you really hate it, just use customise to remove it.
The torrent is available on their ftp server in the same directory. I just downloaded the browser in mere seconds.
I Don't Work Here
IE is so often the 'lowest common denominator' when it comes to designing for the web.
Would that IE actually was a common denominator (as well as the distinction of being the least as Netscape 4 has fallen by the way.)
Now that W3C standards have settled in for several years, it's tragic that the IE math offers "40" as a common denominator to 2003.
"Provided by the management for your protection."
The site is now in the process of being Slashdotted and Farked at the same time.
Server meltdown is imminent.
It seems Google and Firefox developers really have some grey matter. For a long time Microsoft's strategy has been to use one of its existing monopoly in a market to monopolize another market - Browser, Search Engine, E-mail, Server, You name it. The thing is that all of its program depend on one another - or as Microsoft would have loved to put it, "integrate" with one another. The only way for Microsoft Competitors to compete against Microsoft is to unite - an Office Suite provider can team with a graphics software provider, a server side software provider can team up with a client side software provider, or in this case, a search engine can team up with a Browser. But, Microsoft still has a monopoly in the desktop market and it can use/abuse it to gain marketshare in the search engine and browser fields. So now if Google/Firefox want to make sure they dont't just disappear they have to team up with other desktops like Mac or the open source desktops like KDE/GNOME. Anyway, this looks like an intelligent move by both Google and Firefox. Now google can get a share of Firefox's (increasing number of) users and Firefox will great (customized for Firefox) start page by Google to attract new users.
I'm asking because I honestly don't know--I'm at work, and we only use IE here, but at home I could swear I downloaded Firefox 1.0 quite a while ago. What is new with this one that the last one I downloaded doesn't have? I know that when I upgraded to 1.0 way back when, yes, all my extensions had to be re-installed . . . what the heck am I missing?
Happy goldfish bowl to you.
Hey, is it just me, or are the download links at http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/ not updated yet? Still pointing to the 1.0PR...
Anyway, it's great that 1.0 is out.
"Oh, a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-my-own-Grandpa." - Dr Hubert Farnsworth
Here are the Moox cpu-optimized builds for windows (I've been using these since 0.9.3, and they seem significantly faster on my Athlon XP).
Enjoy
"When a ball dreams, it dreams it's a frisbee"
No, I'm Some Kind Of Record.
Are you geeky enough to attend your local BarCamp??
9. Price
Firefox is free! Free to download, free to share. It is being provided by a not-for-profit organization.
Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.
http://almaren.ch/download/firefox-1.0/
http://publipress.com/download/firefox-1.0/
The various versions and locales are slowly trickling in.
(Yes, it's my Official Kharma Whoring Day...)
-- Serge K. Keller
Finish your coffee, you'll feel better.
I don't know what 9 should be, but 10 should be "Profit!"
Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
I moved from Netscape to Opera to Firefox, and am now considering moving back to Opera. Mouse Gestures under Opera were extremely fast and the keyboard shortcuts for common functions were excellent. I've installed the comparable extensions for Firefox, but it's just slower...
AnimeNEXT anime convention
They are all probably playing Halo 2. I think the delay can be forgiven on this particular day...
"Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
Where/When is the ad on NYT? I don't see it in today's edition.
I've just spent several minutes searching in vain for who designed the Firefox/Thunderbird logos. I think they're absolutely amazing, and whoever did it deserves huge props as well. Anyone know who did 'em?
Just copy the NPSVG3 files (.dll and .zip) into the Mozilla plugin directory from wherever Adobe installs them using their SVG viewer install program and you are good to go.
IF the Browser Wars are back, which episode would this one be?
"A New Hope?" or Perhaps, "Return of the Competition"
DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/live-bookm arks.html
"Headlines from Slashdot (RSS ) and the BBC News (RSS ) displayed in the Bookmarks Sidebar. Clicking on a headline takes you right to the article."
Hm.. has anyone here tried reading /.'s feed using the Firefox rss reader? (the new integrated one, not Sage!)
Well, this is the page you get.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
...why do I need to update themes everytime a new point release of FireFox comes out? And why do themes need point releases? The last version of Qute I had that worked (for version 0.7 of FireFox I believe) is 2.1.3. Are themes really that complex to design that they need point relases or are the theme designers just trying to be kewl? This is a stupid problem that plagues FireFox and really should be addressed.
Open Firefox and put about:config in the address line.
Put app.extensions.version in the filter.
Change value from 1.0 to 0.10
Most, if not all, extensions that work in PR should work now.
Your extensions will have to be reactivated by right clicking on each extension and selecting Enable.
Use at your own risk...Lawyers make me say that...
Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
Why does 'File | Quit' not work for me? Using the Linux version.
god damnit, they still have that 'show passwords' crap. when will they understand that people dont need their passwords available in plain text on the screen? and yes, its a flaw NOT a feature. also has a bugzilla entry too. its just been one of those years...
This is probably a dumb question, but how difficult is it to migrate from Mozilla to Firefox? I'm running Mozilla 1.7.3 on WinXP, and quite happy, but I would like to play with Firefox's RSS support. Is migrating as easy as just installing Firefox, or should I uninstall Mozilla first? Will Firefox automagically find my Mozilla Bookmarks?
Thanks,
9. It doesn't render correctly on some sites causing confusion for less savvy computer users who are accustomed to IE "just working".
10. Images seem to load slower with more "image frames" left blank than the same site loading on IE. Not so good for the porn loving IE users.
11. The web is unfortunately built for IE and it will take a LONG time for everything to switch over to "standard compliant" code thus most of what you see in FF just doesn't look quite right.
I've compiled Firefox 1.0 preview a few times, but I always end up going back to 0.9.3. The main reason is I can't get the SpellBound extension to work. I use spell check a lot, especially when posting here. The new features in firefox 1.0 don't seem to outweigh the loss of my precious spell checker.
First of all, by default, you have to type '/' to activate the search as you find tool. Also, the Edit->Find features are still there. Type Control+F and the field will come up so you can type in whatever you want. And then you type in what you want, and then hit enter. Then to search again you can hit F3 or Control+G. So I really don't understand your gripe at all. If you want to change the search/find utility to automatically search as you type (meaning, no typing '/' first), then you can do that as well via Tools-Options->Advanced->Accessibility->2 nd Option.
So...I'm pretty sure I understood your post correctly, but it didn't make much sense, because you can still do CtrlF, F3 as you did before. That has not changed. If I'm wrong, then reply to this.
"Time is long and life is short, so begin to live while you still can." -EV
The German magazine Der Spiegel is covering this story. They praise Firefox for being quicker, lighter and for its ability to be configured by the individual. They also say that many IT security experts recomend Firefox over Explorer and think that it may become a real competitor to Explorer.
Firefox 1.0 steigt in den Ring (Firefox 1.0 Enters the Ring):
http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/technologie/0,15
For the past few releases, I haven't been able to do anything Yahoo with Firefox. I've looked and looked but haven't been able to find anybody else who's having this problem. Both of my bosses, however, have the same problem. And this happens on my work and home computers, so it can't possibly be just me... can it?
For example, if I go to mail.yahoo.com, all I get is the Yahoo Mail logo on a white page. That's it!
Has anybody else had this problem, or know how to fix it?
checksums?
Just in case, it might be a good idea to provide a cached link.
Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
- Read the "Why Use Firefox?" document
- Go download Firefox and install it
- Use Firefox as you default browser for 5 days
- If, after 5 days, you're still not convinced that Firefox is the best browser there is, uninstall it and switch back
(From an original idea on Spread Firefox, but the site is -surprise!- currently unreachable)-- Serge K. Keller
9. XUL really rocks:
Have a look here: http://www.faser.net/mab/chrome/content/mab.xul
Or is this just more of Slashdot believing what they want to believe, regardless of reality?
Seriously, where's the proof? Do we no longer require any hard evidence anymore? (as long as the unfounded claims make the products we like look good, that is).
Look at his username... He's "New Here".
It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
The browser was written to disable plugins not specifically written for 1.0. The 1.0 release comes with a frozen extension protocol and they have to wipe the slate clean in terms of protocol standards. If they didn't do it, you'd still complain about a broken extension system supporting half-written extensions in Firefox.
I tell ya what, I'll just mindlessly skip installing the neato program.
I bet you won't have any problems there.
Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
1. Security
Any really good arguments here?
I'm not sure if you want arguments for or against Firefox, but its security track record is abysmal. There are still UI spoofing security holes relating to XUL, and some of these have been known about for a very long time. It was far worse off than Internet Explorer when it comes to unchecked buffers. Hole-for-hole, it's no better than Internet Explorer.
4. Reliability
They keep breaking themes and extensions every point release. That's unacceptable from an end-user's perspective.
Comparing the rendering times using this page http://scragz.com/tech/mozilla/test-rendering-time .php - Firefox (default install) is at least one second behind Internet Explorer in redering time.
Is Internet Explorer just faster, or is there something I can tweak to make it as fast?
I am just so used to Internet Explorer.
About 2: The way you described it it's a reason to write standards conforming web pages, not a reason to use Firefox: What advantage do Firefox users have from the fact that standard conforming web pages (which they don't create, but browse) also show up in other browsers?
...). Whereas IE doesn't even fully implement CSS1.
No, the point to make is that standard conforming web pages display correctly in FireFox (well, as long as you don't hit the "slashdot bug"
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
... November 9 1989 was the day the Berlin Wall fell.
Just FYI.
And, to not omit anything, November 9 1938 was the day of the Reichskristallnacht.
"Oh, a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-my-own-Grandpa." - Dr Hubert Farnsworth
9. ?
10. Profit!
for a freely downloadable piece of software?
Unfortunatelly, the fix for this bug (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9728 3) didn't make the 1.0 version.
It's been a thorn in my eye for ages. It's the bug that causes div's with an overflow:auto CSS property to not scroll with the keyboard or scrollwheel. As a webdeveloper who's trying to create nice pure-CSS pages it's really quite annoying.
The bug actually is fixed, but the fix wasn't included in the 1.0 release. Too much risk of breaking something in 1.0. You could always download a nightly binary of Mozilla Browser in which the bugfix is included (or at least it was the last time I downloaded a binary)
Too many extensions broke with the 1.0 PR's and now 1.0 final.
Early adoption is bad in this case if you are trying to be productive daily with it.
10.1 is the most compatible so far, fewest bugs and they took out some features I liked after 10.1 like the easy stylesheet switcher in the statusbar.
Install CDs for ISPs like AOL are prime candidates for carrying out an install Firefox.
Trouble is, Microsoft seems to know this and AOL have stuck with the IE engine.
In case it gets slashdotted, new features:
And improvements:
Someone complained about a "Site slashdotted already? Must be some kind of record!" post in less than ten minutes! Must be some kind of record!
5. Comfort - YES!! I just reinstalled WinXP yesterday on a FAT32 partition in order to get Ubuntu and Windows to "play nice," and had to use IE to download a few things before reinstalling Firefox. When a popup appeared, I immediately said aloud: "What is *that*?" To which my friend replied, simply: "A popup." I love Firefox! :)
I am not an animal! I am something worse!
...this was pretty much everything done, final testing underway release. This is the actual, bona-fide, spread far and wide, it's finally 1.0, woohoo, etc. etc. release.
I am NaN
slashdot still doesn't render correctly. Still have to do ctrl+ ctrl-.
"...today consumers have been conditioned to think of beer when they see a bullfrog..."
I successfully grabbed a copy from here
Is GTK+ 1.x now completely unsupported on GNU/Linux? If not, are there any pre-built packages yet, official or not? Can't find any...
Something went very wrong between 0.9 and 1.0 final. I experience random page rendering errors, especially on pages that change frequently. See what I mean here. Only way to fix it is to Ctrl-+ and then Ctrl-- to get the page to show like it should. A minor bug, but very annoying, and a reason not to recommend Firefox to friends and family. Instead I tell them to download Mozilla which doesn't have this flaw.
Now if google would just hook us up and change one of those google o's into a firefox logo life would be really goood.
Got Code?
What's in the Linux version that's not in the windows version?
I'd tend to divide it up a little as some of your points are quite similar. From your post, I'd say that there are two key areas in which firefox is better:
1) Community philosophy (or, Thee Joye of Source)
Mozilla is open source, which IE isn't. This leads to the following benefits:
2) Standards-compliance
In no way is this equivalent to the project being open-source - FOSS developers can be just as bad at compliance as anyone else :) However, the Mozilla developers do not fall into that category. Benefits are as follows:
There are probably many others, and I doubt that this is a great summary, but a hierarchy of benefits is always more persuasive than a collection of 'anecdotal' improvements. Any suggestions?
For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
Is this an upgrade that will be detected and downloaded through the update system from within Firefox PR or do I have to download the whole thing again? Also will I have to re-do extensions [i]again[/i] between PR and 1.0 Final?
Thanks for any information provided.
Happy goldfish bowl to you.
Version 1.5.0 of the runtime kit is available. I am currently upgrading it so don't know whether there are any problems.
To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
P4 1.5GHz, 768mb RAM. Firefox (other iterations, inclusing this new one from which I am writing this) is slow, painfully so. And takes ages to render pages.
I think I'll stick with Opera.
The pre-release still had Preferences under Edit in the File Menu in the linux version while the Windows version had it under the Tools menu. Does the new release have the same irritating inconsistency?
You may as well take "standards" off that list---"your friends" probably don't care, and if they do, they're probably already running a non-IE browser.
If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
I want the IM wars back... MSN Messenger 1.0 released w/ AIM support... AOL updates AIM protocol... MSNM releases patch to fix aim, AOL updates again, MSNM patched again, lather, rinse, repeat... (around '99,2000 if I rmemeber right)
120chars for a sig is teh suck
FF Default Home page?
Die, MSN, die!
The same might be true at some point for ThunderBird, but at the moment, KMail is just so far ahead of everything else that hurts. When that happens, though, Microsoft should be very, very afraid: If you don't need to care about the operating system anymore for 95 percent of the things you do, you don't need to pay all that money to actually buy one from them.
No, but for following the tradition in numbered Slashdot lists.
Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
Great, so mozilla.org is slashdotted. Anyone got any info on the new features in this release or is it purely a bugfix?
Everyone jump on the torrent... (remember that if you didn't use bittorrent to download you can still seed for others - http://dessent.net/btfaq/#seeding)
Switch to Firefox and I'll give you a lollypop little boy.
New options for controlling where links from other applications open.
Thank God! This (and the Slashdot rendering glitch) are the ONLY problems I have with Firefox. This one particularly bites me on OSX machines where you can't APPLE-TAB between multiple windows of one application. Anybody know if it's possible to turn that on?
Hot damn! I've been waiting for 1.0. Now that it's here, time to get EVERYBODY I know to install it!
Bryan
Anybody know if the resource leaks were fixed?
-]Phreak Out[-
Sadly being a web developer I end up designing for IE first and foremost because of the penetration, if it works in IE then (usually) it works ineverything else :)
Hopefully I can switch to Firefox all the time at some point, but it won't be for a good few years yet!
My Portfolio
Security - Nope. I disable everything (including images) and use proxomitron. Nothing can really exploit me except for the really dumb bugs (like the shell: idiocy).
0 8). khtml and IE's renderer are the only ones I know that can handle that thing correctly. I don't remember if Opera did or not but I believe it didn't.
9 still hasn't been fixed. This makes keyboard browsing very unbearable.
Standards - Firefox is really good here. But it doesn't render everything correctly (i.e. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1674
Reliability - Firefox crashes for me at least once a week. IE never crashes. It's more stabler over time, which is good.
Comfort - Nope. Again, I've never seen these issues with IE. With Firefox I can't even get quicktime player to stop embedding even though I've tried various things. At least the source is easy to edit so you can get view source to open up in notepad instead of their shitty source viewer.
Slickness - Sorta. The download manager renders piss poorly and does that annoying fade that slows down everything. Fortunately you can edit it so it doesn't suck as much. Their native widget renderer is inconsistent with stuff all over the place. Fortunately it's improving over time but it's kind of quirky as of right now. Find as you type and tabbed browsing are really, really great though.
And the number 1 reason to not use firefox over IE, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3653
This one is right at the hub of NYC. Big pipes.
http://www.friedneko.com/Firefox Setup 1.0.exe
This is not flamebait--I dislike Microsoft at least as much as most people here. But Firefox did not do, for me, what it claimed it was going to do. This is my experience, and this is what happened. And it's not what should have happened.
1. Security Any really good arguments here? My net admins won't allow it because there isn't a centralized patch server for Windows that handles Firefox/Mozilla updates. I'm not familiar enough with how MS does this, but they use SMS or SUS or something like that to download security updates and push them out to all the desktops. They don't want to depend on end-users updating clients.
Firefox needs the ability to mark certain web pages as IE only. For example, several in-house web-sites use IE's integrated authentication and are unusable in Firefox. If I could tag these webpages as IE only in Firefox, and have Firefox open that page in IE if I type it in the URL box, I would switch immediately.
get nemulator
Yeah, I know OS X has been out for 3 years, but we don't have it at work and I can't afford a new machine that can run OS X. Where's the love, people?
Given that someone on MSDN said that Microsoft is seriously looking at developing a new standalone version of Internet Explorer, don't be surprised that before 2004 ends Microsoft will announce the public beta of Internet Explorer 7.0.
If such a program does exist, I expect the following changes compared to IE 6.01 SP1:
1. Much tighter security.
2. Multi-level ad blocking (that includes blocking Flash and Shockwave animations in addition to pop-up and pop-under blocking).
3. Tabbed browsing.
4. Full Sidebar controls.
5. Totally redesigned toolbar.
6. Will only run in Windows 2000 and Windows XP.
Now if they would just build a full GUI for all of the settings and lose the about:config crap maybe even more people would make the switch.
...it doesn't work at all. Just gives "Connecting to..." forever. I suspect this is a problem related to Authoxy, which protects me from the fnording intrusive password requests of our network. Too bad - I wanted to see if it would help with those one or two sites that Safari still can't handle, but I don't want to live without Authoxy.
Science fiction for grown-ups...
I just get some simple yellow text windows with some red text, such as:
...
wizard id="updateWizard"
^
and then
window id="main window" bla bla bla
I did uninstall 0.93 and removed the dir when it asked (add/remove programs from control panel). I got the same thing for the PR version btw. Had to go back to 0.93 that time, and probably will again.
Not sure if anyone else got this problem, or know how to fix it. Should I delete any folders/files manually?
-Arne
Dammit! I'm left with an empty bookmark folder and to my dismay, bookmarks.bak has also been overwritten after installing firefox 1.0. Be warned!!!
Use F10 to activate Expose and select windows within the currently running app.
Bill Clinton: Pimp we can believe in. - The Shirt!!!
If you are going to do the big honking announcement thing you REALLY need to have bandwidth and/or an Akami contract in place ahead of time. Nothing kills enthusiasm like a timeout error, particularly among newcomers and non-technical types.
And if you can't afford that bandwidth, perhaps a staged rollout would have been better? Registered users first, then Slashdotters, then the big "announcement"?
sPh
Hmmm... I wonder why they didn't create a page using XUL, like this page:
Google XUL
This has become my new homepage in Firefox, although I wish it was centered...
Why should I switch from Mozilla to Firefox?
I have switched back and forth between Phoenix/Firebird/Firefox and Mozilla depending on which one I liked better at the time. Firefox currently is the better one in my opinion. The thing that was keeping me on Mozilla was the master password feature, but Firefox has that now. There are a few nice tweaks that Mozilla has that I don't see in Firefox, but there is probably an option for those tweaks in either about:config or an extension.
Some of the advantages Firefox currently has is better bookmark interface, type ahead find is slightly improved with the panel that pops up, the browser distinguishes between Javascript links by displaying a different mouse cursor when you hover over them, live bookmarks, simpler and less confusing menus, the update system works well. There are other little things I have forgotten about. It is easier for IE users to move to Firefox.
Also, the community seems to be focusing mainly on Firefox (and ignoring Mozilla to some degree) when it comes to extensions and themes. Thus, there appears to be a much better selection of extensions and themes for Firefox. I would guess that the developers are focusing more on Firefox as well. The Mozilla Foundation appears to be making Firefox their flagship product from the way they are marketting it. One of their older roadmaps said that Firefox would replace Mozilla, and that appears to be happening now.
First Post! With Firefox 1.0! :-)
:-)
First Bug! With Firefox 1.0!
(Do this over a slow connection)
Go to mycroft
Click to install the Wikipedia plugin
Go to the search drop down, the Wikipedia icon appears, but the textual name will still be blank (this is why you need a slow connection)
Select it, quickly type a search query and hit return...
CORE DUMP!
Top 10 Best (Worst) Ways to Kill Wesley Crusher
Oh, for fucking Christ sake, you fucking ididot. This was fucking explained a couple of fucking days ago right here on fucking slashdot. Get a fucking clue, you stupid fucking ball-licker.
Jeez, wonder who pissed in his Post Toasties.
Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
The "profit" thing is from an episode of South Park. 1. Steal underpants 2. ? 3. Profit!
I have reinstalled FF. I uninstalled it because it seems to have a problem with multiple simultaneous downloads of tabbed pages. We will see how this version holds up. I can tell right away that this version is much faster. It seems to require less memery?
eat shiat and bark at the moon
Just in case you get modded troll and don't know why: Each single plugin is considered incompatible when a new version of Firefox is released until proven otherwise. I think you even have to change a setting in about:config in Firefox to even allow outdated plugins to run. This one didn't appear lucky enough to run still.
It would be cool if it didn't suck.
Can someone please post the md5sums of the official packages? In particular I'm looking for the one for the win32 installer, "Firefox Setup 1.0.exe".
+5 insightful, surely. He called me "fart knocking", fer crissakes.
Well, it's not hard to sort your bookmarks. Just click bookmarks, then manage bookmarks, and then right click on any link and select "sort by name". There's also a plugin called "sort bookmarks" that does this and more.
Regarding the importing of passwords, the mozilla site says:
"Firefox imports your existing settings from Internet Explorer. An import wizard will run when you first install Firefox (and is also available later through the File menu, File > Import), and it imports your Favorites, options, cookies, stored passwords, and a variety of other data. This saves you time customizing Firefox to fit your needs."
I haven't tried using this but if this didn't work as advertised for you then that is certainly a cause for concern.
If you don't like the spinning circle at the top you can simply install another theme that doesn't feature this. Right now the mozilla site is really slow so you probably won't be able to reach the themes site, so try later.
Personally I could not live without tabbed browsing so IE is no longer an option for me. Also there are plugins like Adblock (I use these filters) that make it indispensible for me.
Now if they would just build a full GUI for all of the settings and lose the about:config crap maybe even more people would make the switch.
Now if Microsoft would just build a full GUI for all of the settings and lose the regedit crap maybe even more Mac users would make the switch.
A lot of the settings available in about:config correspond to Windows Registry entries in HKEY_CURRENT_USER for IE.
No.
The plugin works fine, if you give it enough time to install.
The bug is that "half-installed" plugins can be accessed.
Also, the plugin used is a search engine, which are considered compatible across all versions.
Did I just say "I could not live without tabbed browsing"?
:)
Geez I need to get out more
Isn't the whole point behind auto update is that it does it for you, or it at least tells you that an update is available? It seems to me that auto update isn't working at all. I've gotten no notification of any kind on any of our boxes.
I don't respond to AC's.
...it is known that you have to backup your bookmarks in another place. I lost them quite often with a certain old release of Mozilla. It happened mostly when the program was exited illegally and thus trashed the bookmarks-file(s).
Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
ActiveX controls are the bane of the Web.
That said so are Flash animations and Java applets imho. And iframes... They don't work right in glinks. >.
Moll.
What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
The useful link :)e fox/central.html
http://www.mozilla.org.nyud.net:8090/products/fir
about me A - B
i don't recall reading anything that said FireFox would import your passwords. i could be wrong, though. you DO remember your passwords, don't you? if not, that's not firefox's fault, its your fault.
... i was all ready to write more, but those are you only two reasons you provide. its true, you really have no need to switch. you seem to like useful popup blocking, and tabbed browsing isn't what you'd call a desireable feature. incidentally my grandfather still shaves with a straight razor, still cuts himself every time he shaves, and thinks "those new fangled razors" aren't worth beans.
if you find that spinning circle of dots more annoying than the waving IE flag, well I just don't know how to respond to that, other than to say "change it" or "disable it". both are easy to do, disabling takes about 5 seconds.
progress just leaves some people behind i guess.
Optimized Firefox & Thunderbird Release Builds
\m/
the student/IT worker's best friend, Portable Firefox. Works great off of my USB keydrive. :D
The US Army: promoting democracy through unquestioned obedience
Extension developers should have been granted an access to new versions of Firefox before they are made available. Every new release of Firefox causes the same problems - add-ons like Super DragAndGo, BugMeNot, OpenLongUrl stop working, graphic themes are not compatible and as result new version is less useful than a previous one.
I've been a Mozilla user for years, and have been recommending either it or Firefox for users.
However, I seem to run into a lot of sites, particularly those heavily using Java, which will not render properly, if at all, on Mozilla.
Does anyone else have this problem, and what exactly causes it?
Proverbs 21:19
I've been using Firefox for a couple of months now. Used Netscape for years - yeah, I actually bought a shrink-wrapped version of Netscape, that included one year of free upgrades. Woo hoo! I use IE only for sites that I have to.
That said, I puked the other day when I surfed to my new ASP.NET hosted site and Firefox couldn't handle it! The layout was screwed up, the label colors and borders were wrong, etc.
Being a developer, I understand the need to handle different clients. But do I have to create a dumbed-down version of the site for Firefox users (myself being one of them)?
Does 1.0 handle ASP.NET better that previous versions?
-A_J
(Flame on, Slashdotters. I expect nothing less. And let me preempt the "learn php" or "learn XYZ" posts: I'd love to have the time to learn every language, platform, or whatever, that is out there - but I can't. I'm not an uber-geek (OMG, I used uber-, that is so last century) and cannot, no will not, spend all of my free time in front of a computer.)
Anyone have any clue as to why that might be?
Oh, and I've put a mirror up on my site. Download it here.
So...did they put their ad in the New York Times? Any links to scans / designs for it?
Kev
I certainly expect this to significantly increase adoption in commercial and educational institutions. Firefox can no longer live under the guise of being a "preview" to new technology. They've put their money where their mouth is, and now have a good browser to promote.
michael greene
If you are a regular Slashdot surfer, you might want to check out my extension, SlashFix which fixes the very annoying Slashdot rendering errors in the Firefox 1.0 branch.
These errors are fixed in the Mozilla trunk source code, but for apparently sound reasons, the developers didn't want to check the fixes into the 1.0 branch, apparently because they caused problems with some other, unnamed web sites. SlashFix is a good interim solution so you don't feel compelled to start up IE just to surf your favorite geek time-waste.
Just noticed that FF still can't be installed by a limited user running the installer as Administrator using "Run As..." on an XP box. Bombs out when installing cross platform COM. The installer also doesn't properly exit as it says it will when FF is still running when the installer is run (it prompts you to automatically close the windows, but if it is still running in the background for whatever reason it says the installer will now exit but never does). The non-working limited user install is damning, though...you have to essentially log in as root to install. Is this a bug report-worthy issue?
If you haven't tried bittorrent yet, ask google where to find a client and use it.
The firefox download took only about 5 sec for me and I didn't have to click through multiple mirrors to find one that would respond.
___
Cognitive Overflow
more than yo
Great. Now it'll be a week or so before I can get at the servers. Prick.
As soon as Firefox has IE's market share, it will suffer the same problems IE has suffered.
People love to make this argument, but I've never seen anyone provide any evidence to back it up (while examples providing evidence to the contrary are easy to find - see Apache vs. IIS).
Put up or shut up.
No you are incorrect. You change the value TO 0.10 so that extentions will be fooled into thinking that you are running version 0.10 and not the new 1.0.
Firefox preview was version 0.10
Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
Ctrl+F seems to be broken in that case. It always does 'find as you type' even if that functionality is disabled.
I'm sure 0.9 didn't do this. It's going to make find a real bitch to use.
Mozilla Suite 1.7.3 = 15,800KB
Firefox v1.0 = 15,600KB
These are default installation, without any extensions or add-ons. Mozilla was installed with browser-only option. Process sizes gotten from Windows' Task Manager.
http://johnhaller.com/jh/mozilla/portable_firefox/
Great stuff!!
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70543
Exactly when the source was available, I installed the ebuild and it worked.
Is there any site where I can check the number of downloaded Firefoxes? If I'm not wrong, they planned to achieve 10milion downloads in first ten days. Thank you for advices
Firefox - l33test browser ever.
Language Pack XPI
Locale-switcher extension (updated for Firefox 1.0)
My server
Yes, it did not import my passwords, even though it claimed to do so. I just tried it a second time. As before, it claimed to import them but didn't. (If it's relevant, I'm running Windows98SE.) This is a time-consuming irritation (especially because I no longer remember my passwords, though of course, there are ways of signing in using new passwords with most systems). Of much more concern is trustworthiness: if Firefox does not meet these claims that it makes, what other problems are there?
Quick FYI/FAQ on MOOX's builds...
The website is here: http://moox.ws and the MOOX versions of the official builds are here: http://www.moox.ws/tech/mozilla/releasebuilds.htm
As for how these builds are different
1) Moox uses a number of compiler and linker optimizations to take advantage of specific CPU architecture features (see http://moox.ws/tech/mozilla/#Mdefs for details).
2) Moox uses a number of other source code changes developed himself and another builder that further optimize the source code - help with certain computations, alignments, image processing, etc.
3) Moox also adds in patches from bugzilla to enable features that are not yet in the source tree, stablize the builds further, and make the builds more user friendly.
Moox will also be releasing localized, language specific builds of the official Firefox 1.0 source beginning later this afternoon. He says he will localize all of the M builds into more than 25 different localizations. These will begin to be available after 5:30PM CST on 2004.11.09 according to a post in his forum (http://moox.ws/forum).
The big question is should I now switch from Opera? Or even should I download Firefox to try it and possibly compliment Opera?
I dunno, if Firefox is just a better, more secure and more usable IE/Netscape, I don't know what would I get. There was a comparision with Mozilla already in the thread, of course with IE too, but no mention of Opera. Can anyone "spread Firefox" for me? Do I need it as an Opera user?
Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
And thank you very much.
The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
Advocacy burn-out may have set in after the election and we are well into the Christmas shopping season, a higher priority for most readers than Firefox. I don't expect the add to have much impact.
With thanks to escaflo:
Moox Firefox 1.0 M1 (MMX) Torrent
Moox Firefox 1.0 M2 (SSE) Torrent
Moox Firefox 1.0 M3 (SSE2) Torrent
Use the torrents and save his bandwidth.
Visceral Psyche Films
It bugs me to no end because I use the dropdown history instead of some extra bookmarks. Never works the first time...
HEHEE...
:) :)
Think about it...
TONS of geeks downloading Firefox.
Each copy of Firefox has a live bookmark pointing to slashdot.
Slashdot's RSS news feed get's slashdotted and Cmdr. Taco goes nuts
Finally, this is what happened
I really wonder what the present download count is!
Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
What's the use of burying the useful options that many users would want in a largely meaningless mess of power-user options? There are a hell of a lot of options in Firefox but mos users will never change any but the simplest. What does your mother want with a pipelining option for instance? about:config is a perfectly useable interface for the more esoteric options.
Why is anything anything?
You run OO.o on Mac OS X? How the hell did you get that to work outside of X11?
You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
Linux torrent [mozilla.org]
Win32 torrent
Sorry, no Mac torrent available... but, for completeness, here's a direct link
Thanks to Space (13455), below, for pointing out the linux torrent.
#SickNotWeak
I just downloaded this MOOX build, the m3 version (I have a pentium 4). First off, I got it up and running, and I noticed my bookmarks werent working at all--you click on them and absolutely nothing happens. I then noticed that it had CHANGED my windows wallpaper with a solid bright GREEN image. I don't know wtf this build is doing messing with my wallpaper, but I'm going to reccommend against people downloading this.
You run OO.o on Mac OS X? How the hell did you get that to work outside of X11?
You can run X11 on Mac OS X.
XP is approaching a 60% market share overall and is probably far more dominant in the home market.
Website seems overloaded...but the coral link works. I just went there using it so the cache is updated.
i re fox/
http://www.mozilla.org.nyud.net:8090/products/f
Why bother making a Firefox-specific page when you're going to put the whole thing in a bunch of s anyway?
I'm schizophrenic; no I'm not.
Actually, there's a much easier way. Browse Happy, formerly known as noIE, by the author of IE7.
The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
--Aristotle
What's this?!
I saw the news on slashdot, finished what I was doing at work, went home, fired up YaST, then Synaptic and neither has the 1.0 release yet.
--
"Indians! We're doomed, Tonto!"
"What do you mean 'we', white man?"
10. Profit!
Can somebody post a quick +/- list for of Firefox for people who already use Mozilla. Is this essentially just getting the browser part by itself or are there reasons to switch?
--
David McGuinness
david.mcguinness@gmail.com
http://www.soundsourcemusic.net/
How is this insightful? You could say that about tons of other software. You know what's nice about Office, it actually works on the OS's it purports to work on. Oh, you think Office sucks and doesn't work for you? Well I think OpenOffice really sucks and really doesn't work well at all.
Give me a break. This guy basically said, forget quality, if it runs on any OS, it kicks ass.
What benefit would one have for upgrading to Firefox 1.0 from 0.9.3? I just upgraded and I haven't noticed much of a difference, other than the fact that some of the extensions I use (e.g., All-in-One Gestures) no longer work in 1.0.
Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
I'm with you on that one. KMail is way ahead of bee stings, whips and chains and Microsoft Outlook.
9. You can uninstall it if you don't want it.
10. It's not from Microsoft.
In Soviet America the banks rob you!
Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
Apple-` will switch between the windows of the active application.
First Halo 2, now Firefox 1.0 - Tis a beautiful day arealdy, folks!
Don't forget to hit your local MozParty. Parties are listed at http://www.openforce.com/mozparty2
I'll be hosting the one for New York City. Info for that one at http://www.openforce.com/mozparty2/?party=179
-- My childhood bathtoys were Toaster and Hairdryer
Do you want to promote FF? Let's strike. Publish on your blog the following statement - "Strike! Dear reader. Not another post before you have installed FF on your computer! Install firefox, use it, post on your blog a post that links to post in my blog. "Proud user of FF". Post a link or email me or do both things. Why use FF? http://www.spreadfirefox.com/ This week postings on my blog will depends how many surfers have switched to FF. 10 new FF users, new post on my blog!"
Kmail should be ported to windows I think. Killer App
http://www.robotii.co.uk/
Out of the box , Firefox 1.0 does not have the "new tab" icon in the default toolbar - you have to add it. (Linux version)
A bit strange considering how "tabbed browsing" is one of the key features.
You insensitive clod! I'm using smoke signals to communicate with the people doing the signal fires on the peaks to the drum relay in the desert to the guy at the fort with the tin can and string hookup to the shared,village phone through a 110 baud acoustic coupler, in a cardboard house where they only get power 4 hours a day and phone service 4 hours a day, with no overlap. And sometimes corrupt policia take the few bits that get through!
1) Cannot get a theme that makes things compact enough. Internet Explorer is the best for this. You get the File etc. menu, the address bar and the controls all on one small strip up top. But, of course, no tab bar to worry about. However, even if it did have a tab bar it would still be more compact then the next best which is... ...the MicroMozilla theme in the plain old Mozilla browser. Which is pretty good (I use this browser). The maximum resolution I can have is 1024x768, so when you have this hulking thing up top doing in 100 pixels what should be done with 50, it's incredibly annoying.
2) The lack of a new tab button on the tab bar. This is the ultimate piss off for me. I cannot stand not having a new tab button there.
Finally we can begin to rely more heavily on designing/testing for standards compliance over browser idiosyncracy-compliance, and focus more energy on content & functionality. As other browsers adapt, the Internet as a whole stands to benefit. Many thanks to all who've contributed to the Mozilla/FF effort.
Anyone seen an option to change the alt+# (for changing to a specific tab) back to the ctrl+# way?
Think I'll be changing back to 1.0pr without that.
How much I love firefox, been loving windowmaker for much longer.
Often, when I come across an interesting link, I just open it in a browser window or in a tab and place it minimized on my desktop somewhere; to be read at a later time when it's more convenient. When Mozilla or Firefox crash, which still happens too often, these "read for later" links are lost.
Joachim
People don't write Manifestos any more -- what's going on in this world? [Frank Zappa]
I seem to have some very wierd bugs in my Firefox I use win98 perhaps that's the case...
Links don`t open in new tabs as they should, that is a tab opens but it loads a blank page.
Adress bar seems constant to all tabs, (looking at this page I see the adress of my blog..)
Nothing in the status bar..
back/forward buttons broken. the only way to go back is using backspace.
Can't think of anything else now, but still creeppy...
./R My blog
Firefox makes it hard to turn off things like GIF animation & blink tags; I don't believe it works with Adblock. So why does anyone use it over Mozilla?
"The W3C is the de facto standards body for internet standards."
:-) ) but when the intended meaning is exactly opposite the expressed meaning, I'll chime in.
No, the W3C is an *actual* standards body for Internet (Web, actually) standards. IE is the "de facto" standard browser, despite not being standards-compliant. Confusing? Indeed. Kinda like the early 1990s, when "alternative" music became meainstream.
I'm not normally this pedantic (here, anyway
PS: great post otherwise. I'll even flesh out point #1 for you, with Microsoft's help: "...an attacker could run programs on your computer while you view a Web page. This affects all computers with Internet Explorer installed (even if you don't run Internet Explorer as your Web browser [emphasis added])."
Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
Accoustic couplers are only 110 baud. When 300 baud modems with direct connection to a phone line became legal in the early 1980s it was great. With 110 you watch every character slowly spit out. You appreciated the breviety of the UNIX command line and the short command names (ls, cp, mv, ln, rm).
So, i guess Thunderbird 1.0 will be released later on? Is it 0.9 that's supposed to complement Firefox 1.0?
Just checking...
So far, my Mozilla T-shirt doesn't have any holes in it and it's thanks to me, one of the 732 141 programming contributors to the mozilla project, Freddy Pigglybits got a coke and a burger !
I've done my bit !
A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
And example of releasing multiple builds would be the MAME group.
On my PIII,20 GB [ lots of free space ],64 MB RAM machine, firefox loads in 13 seconds.
I upgraed the RAM to 128 MB. Now it takes 10 seconds to load!
But the pages are faster though.
Why does yahoo do this
I am a little disappointed in the release as it still has issues. If you tell it not to be your default browser (mine is Mozilla) it does not behave correctly as it wipes out your default.
It also has critical bugs in regard to framed pages.
Has MS taken over FF dev? Why ship a product with irritating issues and known critical bugs?
OpenOffice with X11: http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/ooo-osx_download s.html
God I love Firefox. The only damn thing that still doesn't work right are pages that require Java. They work much better on IE. The only time I launch IE is when I need to do some online banking.
http://piro.sakura.ne.jp/xul/_tabextensions.html.e n#download
(Handles the first two gripes nicely)
iam on FF 0.9.2. to be honest.Not yet tried ver1.0.
But This page https://jobs.intel.com/jobs/jobs.iccw still loads with error ( text overlap ) in FF. Perfect in IE.:(
Why does yahoo do this
MOD PARENT UP!!!!
4. In some cases, an Acrobat file will cause FireFox/Mozilla to crash.
I reported the crashing more than a year ago in Firefox, and more than 2 years ago in Mozilla. Recent builds of Firefox have been worse.
In Firefox:
bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=222660
(Cut and paste the URL. Bugzilla doesn't like visits from Slashdot readers.)
10. Its the coolest browser to use.
Why does yahoo do this
Towards the end of installation it crashed and now when I launch firefox I get:
XML Parsing Error: undefined entity
Location: chrome://browser/content/browser.xul
Line Number 910, Column 33:
chromedir="&locale.dir;">
I used the internal auto update feature. I guess I'll uninstall and reinstall.
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
I have a question about adblock.Since Iam billed according to the amount of data I download,I ask this. ,but isnt displayed?
When I use adblock to block *.swf files, does it prevent it from getting downloaded or is it that it gets downloaded
Why does yahoo do this
Maybe they're all playing Halo 2?
Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
I would be one happy camper if the Konq/Safari team would switch to Gecko as their rendering engine.
We could consolidate our efforts and make XUL a standard.
Can you set up firefox to use keywords in the address bar? In IE, I had used tweakUI so I could type something like "IMDB Fight Club" and it would go to IMDB and perform that search. In the utility, I had to tell it how to handle that with a %s, such as
www.imdb.com/Find?select=All&for=%s
CTRL-B for bookmarks and CTRL-H for history toggles either sidebar off/on. Who could ask for anything more?
Religion is the opium of the people. Evolution is the opium of scientists.
Firefox 1.0 is available now for Windows, Linux, and Mac
Why to people keep refering to the Mac like it's an operating system? Are people really that slow?
That line *should* read: Firefox 1.0 is available now for Windows, Linux, and OS X . That's right, there is more than one operating system for the Mac! "Mac" and "Mac OS X" are not interchangeable.
BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
nice troll
portable firefox7 66550
7 66966
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=129027&cid=10
strike
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=129027&cid=10
First, Mozilla 1.7.3 works just fine for me. Second, I just tried Firefox 1 and it doesn't block popups although set it in the prefs. Third, the one feature I most liked about Galeon and which is missing in both Mozilla and Firefox is folder specific bookmark saving. More specifically, in Galeon you could click on a bookmark folder and save the current page there through the context menu. Now , THAT was a timesaver.
Okay, a few problems with Firefox: 1.) some ad banners cause it to crash...hard (specifically interactive ads like Intel's new ones with the magnifying glass and Absolut Raspberry ads with the stupid color changing "confetti") 2.) http://www.ign.com/ does not load completely and just gives me broken Quictime logos. Who else has experienced these problems and what have you done to fix them?
http://www.bynarystudio.com
People often forget that Opera is not just a browser, but an entire Internet suite.
It has an email client too, which Gmail was modeled after! Yup, Google borrowed from Opera when they decided on how to handle mail.
It also has newsgroups support, and a chat client.
So Opera and Firefox aren't really alternatives to each other as such.
I recommend Opera for email, by the way. It has insanely fast searches, and it is very flexible since it isn't tied down by folders. It makes things very easy and convenient.
In the end, though, you decide what you need. I personally like Opera because the browser part is faster than anything else on my PC, plus it's very convenient to have everything in a small package instead of having to install features manually. And when I upgrade, everything continues working...
Clever signature text goes here.
WTF? Who modded parent Insightful?
Trekkie trolls unite for better karma!
Win XP SP2 warns you against installing it for this very reason. Please, someone at Mozilla.org, sign the release binary.
Only one of my firefox extensions survived the upgrade, I'm feeling severely handicapped...
I find myself thinking about going back to IE for a while... At least if I hadn't been rather well informed about how much Firefox is better.
Anyway, this is still a serious question for help, and I'd appreciate any informative answers.
I'm a dreamer, the world is my playpen. But hey, I'm a serious person, I can't dream all the time.
Is Shockwave support built in or does this just mean that Firefox is compatible with Shockwave add-ons? If I install the new Firefox over the previous version, e.g. with Synaptic, will I have to go back and reinstall Shockwave Flash?
Thanks.
I just installed Fox.1 and it disabled my AdBlock. In the extensions panel it says its not compatible.
I have AdBlock 0.5.2+ on Mac
Anyone else seen this? The update feature does not find a new version. This would seem to be a major goof. As AdBlock kicks Ass!
Does anyone know if Firefox works with user profiles in a Windows 2000/2003 terminal services deployment without bugs?
Uh... Firefox has only just come out of beta. You have to accept that things will get broken more oftern in beta software.
Is it just me or did the quality of Firefox icon (that appears on a Windows desktop) get reduced? I'm looking at an older version of the icon and it seems much smoother and with more colors! This seems like a strange thing to change for a 1.0 release if it isn't just me.
-- Reality is for people who lack imagination.
1) More or fewer than IE?
2) What, you mean the beta point releases? You know, the ones that are BETA SOFTWARE? How shocking.
Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
not to be a ninny, but when are they going to fix the tabbed focus stealing bug? This is an extermely irritating and confusing bug that affects every user using tabs.
Agreed! Having Firefox open external links in a new tab rather than hijacking the current one is extremely convenient. That and sorting bookmarks were two features that seemed like no-brainers but took almost Firefox's entire lifespan to get implemented. Glad they made it :).
Rock over London, Rock on Chicago. Wheaties: Breakfast of Champions.
I agree with you. When Slashbots talk about Mozilla/Firefox/whatever, they go into some kind of robot mode where they worship tabbed browsing. I've used it and found that it's kind of nifty, but I don't think it's as big a deal as all these Slashbots think it is. They talk about it like it's going to boost your productivity by 419% and make web browsing 300% better. But I agree with the parent: most people I've seen never have more than a few windows open. Even most people I've seen who use tabbed browsing never have more than a few tabs. I guess you have to have SOMETHING to be zealous about.
For them, point 8 doesn't matter at all. They don't see MS as evil because they don't pay attention and don't care.
These people also don't know what W3C is, and all that matters to them is that everything renders in IE because sites have to be IE compatible. If a site is W3C noncompliant - but renders correctly in IE and not in Firefox - whose problem is it? So point 2 won't win anyone either.
I'd say point 6 won't work either - since IE hasn't changed in 5 years, continuity is something they definitely have! The innovation angle could work, but not so well for the average user. Remember, they just want the internet to work. For them, the browser is the internet.
Points 3 and 7 are marginal. It will work for the Mac crowd, but the very reason that windows users use IE now is because they don't feel like screwing with their browser, either to get a new skin or a new plugin. IE supports the plugins that 99% of the population needs already.
Points 1,4,and 5 are the winners. Security, lack of spyware crap, and lack of popups. Pimp the hell out out these points. I'd also add tabbed browsing if you can show it to someone, also the native RSS support (though firefox could make that a lot cooler than it is in 1.0).
I'd keep the message short and simple, and tailored to the things that people hate about IE right now, and that services like Earthlink and finally AOL are starting to sell.
For what it's worth, I just converted two people this morning.
-Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat
Many, many problems. My advice: Ditch Firefox and buy yourself a Mac with Safari. Much nicer.
For some people, that may depend on who's weilding the whips & chains.
No dissention on the bee stings and Outlook.
Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
This is too wierd. Last night I was hoping there was a stroy on FF so I could post and interesting thing I found on Google.
I was researching UK currency and wanted to see what I'd get from googling "1/-", which was a column header for "shilling" in a table I saw. The first result was Mozilla.org.
For kicks I decided to enter "#1" - to see who google thought was number one, ala sports cheering. Sure enough, Firefox was number 1.
If they're fixing their search results to coincide with 1.0, well, I'm not sure whether to laugh it off, be purist mad at them, or celebrate my favorite browser.
I sure as heck don't think it's a coincidence.
Stuff that matters.
... it had been November 9th for some eighteen hours before they got around to releasing Firefox 1.0. SOP for Americans though I guess - "What, you mean teh intarweb extends *beyond* america?"
Does this release support overflow-x and overflow-y?
Am I the only one who hates the "Information bar"? Whats the point in blocking an intrusive popup if the notification is also intrusive? What happened to the nice little notification in the status bar? At the very least it should have an option to close should I not care about the fact someone wants me to see a popup ad.
Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
I run Firefox on my Apple. Much better than Safari or IE. Though I don't even think they are supporting IE on Macintosh anymore.
-- "Life's not fair, but the root password helps."
Just in case you get modded troll
Hmm.. I just tried this "bug", (did you?)and it indeed crashes (My WinXP) Firefox. I don't know about any other platform, but...
THIS IS CLEARLY A BUG
It's clear the parent reply hasn't even bothered to read the submitted problem.
I personally gave up reporting Mozilla problems a year or so ago, due to the same "fuck you troll, ain't no bug, we can't be bothered to try it out - but it ain't no bug - couldn't possibly happen" attitude of Moz. developers.
*Cough* alpha-transparent PNG images not displayed properly? Impossible! Go fuck yourself neil[at]neilpearce.com - Lotsa abuse - Oh... Ah... Hmmm.... You seen this? - Errr... Shit! - Hmmm... Errr.. Fixed next release!
Let me ask maybe a dumb question:
I like Mozilla very much, it's a great browser and I'm very happy that it exists - thanks to all who have contributed!
I would use Firefox, but there is one thing I prefer in Mozilla: The URI field in the navigation bar allows to search for keywords by entering the keywords and pressing Tab and Enter. I don't like the seperate search field like it is in Firefox.
Might seem like a detail, but often the details count.
Since everything is programmable and extensible, please enlight me ignorant user, if there is a way to mimic that behaviour in Firefox.
And don't understand me wrong, it's great that Firefox exists. It's lightweight, a joy to install, and I will recommend it to every MSIE user.
For me, I will stick to the dinosaur.
You shouldn't need to keep restarting the application. Have you tried compacting your folders? You can compact a single folder by right-clicking on the folder and choosing "Compact this folder" or you can compact all folders from the File menu. I think part of what that does in IMAP accounts is clear out messages from the server that have been marked as deleted.
You also may want to take a closer look at the deletion options in the preferences. You can have things delete immediately, but I've found that sometimes it's still necessary to compact folders to really get the server to purge the messages. Give it a try.
Oh, and grab Thunderbird 0.9 if you haven't already. It just came out a few days ago.
Linux: 1.1 Gig Up
Windows: 54.7 Megs Up
Gig' Em
-Michael
Mozilla Europe's site still seems fast: http://www.mozilla-europe.org/en/products/firefox/
I just downloaded it, I've been using Avant Browser, which also has pop-up blocking as well as flash blocking, ad blocking, and tabbed browsing. It runs on top of IE, so it more vulnerable, but the feature it has that I miss so far in Firefox is mouse gestures (right-click then left click to go back, vice versa to go forward). Does anyone know of a way to do this in Firefox?
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
I can assure(maybe unassure?) you that this is not the case.
This attitude is prevalent across many development areas.
Why?
Ego.
You have to have a significant ego level to think these things can be accomplished.
I have spent the last 5 and 1/2 years in testing and test lead positions and recognize that the level of confidence required the create software from nothing is huge.
The is just unprofessional. Not atypical, but very unprofessional.
Also, the OP wrote:
New experimental options for controlling where links in web pages open. To make these experimental options appear, set browser.tabs.showSingleWindowModePrefs to true in about:config.
Actually these were added in RC1, but apparantly due to bugs, they were made hidden in 1.0 and you have to do the about:config thing to show them.
End of Line.
Here is the torrent.
r el eases/1.0/source/firefox-1.0-source.tar.bz2.torren t
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/
Looks like you are going to have to compile it yourself.
Does it go on forever?
Interesting that he doesn't give a list of source changes. He may be inviolation of the GPL and MPL!
Yeah, but I do want to be notified, just quietly. Like an icon appearing in the status bar, like firefox used to have. That way if I am expecting something to happen I can check the status bar to see if it blocked a pop-up I wanted to see (the only possible reason I would want to be notified in the first place).
Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
Gah! That sounds like an abysmally bad idea. For all its other flaws, XUL is the very worst thing about Mozilla.
Making interfaces consistent throughout applications, across different platforms, is exactly backward. Interface is a lot of what a platform is, and needs to be consistent throughout the platform, across all of its applications. Inter-application consistency is more important than intra-application consistency.
Deciding that your application is more important than the platform is the hubris which causes people, quite correctly, to ignore your application.
Is there a Pango-enabled Firefox (Linux) version available for download anywhere?
I wonder if a preference for this is buried somewhere in about:config. Or perhaps this functionality could be implemented as an extension.
End of Line.
a new firefox arrived in cvsup just now
# portupgrade -r firefox
[Updating the pkgdb in
---> Upgrading 'firefox-1.0.r1,1' to 'firefox-1.0.r2_1,1' (www/firefox)
>> firefox-1.0rc2-source.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in
>> Attempting to fetch from http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/re
oh, I guess I'll be doing it all again soon, rc1 is quite broken for me, middle click just opens a new untitled tab *and* I can't save preferences, I was going to try and sort it out but I'm on the upgrade treadmill. I'd forgotten what the constant cycle of upgrades was like since leaving Win32 on that oh so happy day.
There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
for editing your preferences?
I seem to recall reading, after looking at a roadmap, that 1.0 would be delayed for OSX, since they wanted to Aqua-fy it. Now, I see that there is a nice 1.0 OSX package available. Is it "just Firefox," without OSX pretty-ness, or did they get it done early?
I see I'm not very observent. This was mentioned in 3 comments earlier today..
Oops!
John Hancock
What optimization flags do you see in about:buildconfig ? (may have to cut and paste the link)
I've got Firefox installed on my computer, but I haven't yet completely switched over to it. My reasons for not switching to Firefox have dwindled down to the following:
1) Firefox doesn't allow me to open multiple browser windows by using a bound keyboard shortcut (CTRL+ALT+E)
2) Just as MSIE has the annoying, hard-to-get-rid-of "Links" folder in its Favorites menu, Firefox has its own required "Bookmark" directory which it will not let you delete.
3) Firefox still renders many pages oddly. Yes, I know this is because a lot of web pages have been developed with MSIE's bugs in mind. Regardless, it is still annoying.
Nothing disturbs me more than blind loyalism towards some unrealistic and over-idealistic notion of one's nationality.
Click the information bar and select "Don't show this message...". Then you'll only get status bar notifications.
The shareholder is always right.
The modifications made to a standard ZIP of Firefox are as follows:
Portable versions of Firefox, GIMP, LibreOffice, etc
How do I stop FF from asking me if I want to download a program from a website?
Every stinking time I try to install an extension a stupid box pops down and tells me that if I want to download a file automatically from the website I need to add it to a list of allowed sites. I am getting sick of adding every single site I want to install something from onto some dumb list.
Can't I just tell it to leave me alone and let me install and download things from anywhere I want? I don't want to keep adding something to a list and have it become super massive over time.
Thanks. It is in a slightly different place than where it used to be (I think it was on the left side before) so I may have missed it had that been working in previous releases.
Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
How do I uninstall this sucker completely?
I want to do a fresh install but everytime I run the uninstall program and then reinstall it all of the old settings are there. It has a history, keeps the extensions, remembers everything I typed into text boxes..
How do I start over?
Spoofing has nothing to do with XUL. Firefox's fix is the same as IE's: force the status bar to always be visible.
The shareholder is always right.
Whenever a new release of something is announced, there's the inevitable response of "but I just finished installing [old version here]". Well, it happened to me. I finish installing Firefox 1.0-RC2 and Slashdot was the first site I visited with it, and this was the first story. Sigh.
Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
1.0 on the Mac is great! Noticably faster. why, it even displays text from Slashdot correctly! (1.0 tended to overwrite links onto the plain text of the message-at least on my 10.2.8 machine). 1.0
I was just driving home, and the CBC Radio (am) show "As It Happens" just featured a segment on the Firefox 1.0 release. It's finally mainstream!
http://www.spreadfirefox.com/ is a 0-byte file today.
Hmm, I guess the word is getting around TOO fast LOL.
Episode 2-17: Gnomes, to be exact.
My post was a simple joke, nothing more, nothing less.
I have found the same to be mostly true on Windows.
Rendering is the same speed as far as I can tell, and I have not found a site that can be rendered by Firefox but not by the Suite (or vice versa).
I like Venkman the JavaScript debugger, I like the integrated Mail client (which I use a lot).
I like that I have easy options to disable GIF cycling, and that I can prevent the suite from asking me to download the flash-plugin all the time. It also comes in handy that I can disable images to be loaded from any server but the originating server.
All of these may be available for FireFox, but why aren't they accessible through the standard menus?
I guess I just do not see the point of FireFox, the only advantage seems to be the smaller download (which is not even the case if you use both Firefix and Thunderbird)... I really hope the suite is continued past 1.8.
Yes there is. It's called all-in-one gestures. Look for it at http://update.mozilla.org/extensions/ under "mouse gestures". It's very configurable.
Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
I just setup another machine with Firefox 1.0 for the firs time (Windows 2000, previously had IE 6 only) and when the popup notice came, it had the option for me to don't notify me. When I did that, a dialog box came up and said that an icon would appear in the corner when a popup was blocked. Sure enough, when I load a page that reliably tries to bring a popup window, http://mail.lycos.com/, the icon appears in the lower right corner.
End of Line.
My version of the story: http://www.winslowslair.supremepixels.net/blog/ind ex.php?p=14
1-Crawl 2-Cnfg 3-ATF 4-Exit ?
It's not that it's not working completely, but every once in a while (about as often as before installing the extension) I get the same kind of mis-rendered page. The page has definitely finished loading... Throbber not throbbing, page loaded completely including copyright notice, etc. I'm on a "good" 'net connection, and the server doesn't seem bogged down at all, so... Anyway, the forced reflow trick with CTL +/CTL - still works, so I don't know what could be going on. Just thought I'd let you know my experience. And by the way, it sucks about the lack of documentation... Thanks for your effort though!
(This is on MS-Windows 95; I haven't tried it yet on Linux (because I can't get the stupid serial port to work).)
I am also running my monitor at 1600x1200, but don't use the whole screen, only about 1200x800.
At that size, the tabs start shrinking and running off the right-hand side once 37 tabs are open.
Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
After getting one unblocked popup, I thought I'd give your advice a try. And ok, I was wrong. Neat feature is that search toolbar, and even neater is customizing the toolbar.
I'll have to go past the Firefox site and give much praise.
Blah blah blah firefix yada yada ie is better!
yeah!
(dammit, that friggin eleven fscks the whole joke up)