another INFORMATIVE LINK AHEAD:)
This is just ONE of the MANY articles relating to this very subject:)BR.
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/slidingdoors2/
As for cookies, it's those little fuckers that most frequently allow dickwads to build a profile on you and sic marketing departments on you like there's no tomorrow.
I HOPE your not talking about slashdot moron?
This explains why you are a self-confessed coward:)
And yet it IS STILL THE MOST standards compliant browser out there.
http://www.w3.org/
Get your shit straight people.
Stop dropping your loads everytime a MS bashing session comes along.
Um, wrong again.
Using your theory, the layers would NOT communicate unless forced to. (no choice)
I prefer Thousand island myself, as it is already one integrated package:)
That's a shame you're going to miss out on this, and still a lot of the web today then, seeing how even the W3C still uses and promotes the iFrame:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/TS/html401/cp0101/0101-IF RAME.html
Hopefully, they will simply either change the iFrame tag to something a little more controllable such as: DIV or better yet, OBJECT
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/objects.htm l#edef-OBJECT
FYI, (www.macromedia.com)not to sound redundant, but you CAN bookmark in Flash as of Flash MX (frames and scenes) and you could even program that functionality into a Flash 5 app too if you still use it.
Also the source CAN be studied directly from the.swf itself (playing or not) even many 3rd party apps have been made to allow detailed view, and even extraction.
And the W3C DOES have control over it:)
For just one specific reference regarding xhtml compliant Flash integration, check out this article at 'A List Apart' regarding the and issues, see:
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/flashsatay/
You DO, however, have a good point about the "plugin needed" issue, but then again, you could simply use a browser that comes with it, like IE or...well, IE:)
When you say: Unlicensed distribution of software is damaging. We in the open source community are its primary victims because it denies us the opportunity to make a sale. Cracking down on piracy, therefore, is (I believe) beneficial to all of us.
What do you mean by "Make a sale"?
Is not the idea of "open source" to be free for all?
SERIOUSLY NOT trying to be stupid, (hehe.. too late) I'm just asking a question that I've always wondered about, since I have heard others in the open source comm. say this in the past as well.
Thanks for any info!
Yeah, I live here too, but how do I get my cut of that pie from both MS products I bought between those dates stated in the article??
Also, what if I cannot prove I OWNED a licence back in 97??
long sice trashed those boxes....
On Xp now, love it, but as usual with MN, I HIGHLY doubt I will ever see a red cent of that settlement my wonderfull government got for me, on my behalf.
Slashdot Mirror
Ok mod this funny as HELL!!!!!!!!! lol ! +20!
How the hell does my direct parent get modded 5 informative with the troll comment AND his link to pr0n????
Ahhhhh... I get it now, the mods are only 14 year-old script kiddies with lube on thier butts.
another INFORMATIVE LINK AHEAD:)
This is just ONE of the MANY articles relating to this very subject:)BR. http://www.alistapart.com/articles/slidingdoors2/
INFORMATIVE LINK AHEAD
One link my friend: http://www.alistapart.com
As for cookies, it's those little fuckers that most frequently allow dickwads to build a profile on you and sic marketing departments on you like there's no tomorrow.
I HOPE your not talking about slashdot moron?
This explains why you are a self-confessed coward:)
Um, can you show me a F U L L Y standards compliant browser?
Think/research before you speak.
http://www.w3.org/
And yet it IS STILL THE MOST standards compliant browser out there.
http://www.w3.org/
Get your shit straight people.
Stop dropping your loads everytime a MS bashing session comes along.
Um, wrong again.
Using your theory, the layers would NOT communicate unless forced to. (no choice)
I prefer Thousand island myself, as it is already one integrated package:)
Yet again, the unknowlegable resonse to anything MS related.
The average "Joe User" knows NOTHING of these important things.
So, try again.
NOT a troll at all.
It is a basic FACT, proven TIME AND TIME AGAIN!!!!
I agree with you man.
Um, well for starters, the 2D graphics throughput available in the highend cards I use on a daily basis are NOT compatable with osx yet.
So THATS why. The "gaming" cards seem to have no issues with this for less $$.
Why does Apple insist on calling iTunes/Pod the "World's Best Digital Music Experience"?
For the same reason thay illegaly claimed "The worlds fastest" personal computer.
Talk about Anti-trust...
Read up on antitrust laws and why they exist.
Which is exactly why MS has a good point.
Either way, my next Windows OS install will EXCLUDE ANYTHING Apple-related. Period.
Yeah Boyeeee!!!
We got yo new fly IBM server in da hizouse yo!
Insensitive Clod...
jk...
May your rant reek with a cluster of 1000 yr old grits from Natalie Portmans pants..
C'mon, mod my direct parent up! that was dam funny after my long day:)
I agree! OMFG!
This and cancer I've always hoped would be given the beat-down in my lifetime.
hope they continue the good work.
That's a shame you're going to miss out on this, and still a lot of the web today then, seeing how even the W3C still uses and promotes the iFrame:F RAME.html
m l#edef-OBJECT
http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/TS/html401/cp0101/0101-I
Hopefully, they will simply either change the iFrame tag to something a little more controllable such as: DIV or better yet, OBJECT
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/objects.ht
FYI, (www.macromedia.com)not to sound redundant, but you CAN bookmark in Flash as of Flash MX (frames and scenes) and you could even program that functionality into a Flash 5 app too if you still use it. .swf itself (playing or not) even many 3rd party apps have been made to allow detailed view, and even extraction.
...well, IE:)
Also the source CAN be studied directly from the
And the W3C DOES have control over it:)
For just one specific reference regarding xhtml compliant Flash integration, check out this article at 'A List Apart' regarding the and issues, see:
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/flashsatay/ You DO, however, have a good point about the "plugin needed" issue, but then again, you could simply use a browser that comes with it, like IE or
(ragecgi ducks head, turns and runs...)
Thanks! Seriously always wondered about that.
THATS THE LAMEST THING I EVER HEARD!!!!!!!! LOL! (...loved that bit....) ...and that one leads wussy-boy back to his bitch... LOL:)
I am NOT trying to be argumentative, just asking:
When you say:
Unlicensed distribution of software is damaging. We in the open source community are its primary victims because it denies us the opportunity to make a sale. Cracking down on piracy, therefore, is (I believe) beneficial to all of us.
What do you mean by "Make a sale"?
Is not the idea of "open source" to be free for all?
SERIOUSLY NOT trying to be stupid, (hehe.. too late) I'm just asking a question that I've always wondered about, since I have heard others in the open source comm. say this in the past as well.
Thanks for any info!
Yeah, I live here too, but how do I get my cut of that pie from both MS products I bought between those dates stated in the article??
Also, what if I cannot prove I OWNED a licence back in 97??
long sice trashed those boxes....
On Xp now, love it, but as usual with MN, I HIGHLY doubt I will ever see a red cent of that settlement my wonderfull government got for me, on my behalf.
Um, "Insightfull"????
Obviously neither yourself nor your mod has taken even a slight glance and ANY Apple product???
Looks like a "My First Computer" pos to me.
I say the same thing about Safari all the time.
I've got almost all browsers on my Windows dev box, but that dang Safari just won't install??
It's almost like Apple just doesn't care.
Oh well, at least MS is TRYING to do something about the situation, rather than nothing at all..... ever:)