Slashdot Mirror


Age Discrimination, Indian-Style

theodp writes "In April, IBM CEO Samuel Palmisano told investors Big Blue hopes to dodge an estimated $6 billion in liability stemming from a judge's ruling that IBM violated U.S. federal age discrimination laws. In May, IBM closes on its $150-$200MM purchase of Indian outsourcer Daksh, whose age requirements for job applicants make Logan's Run seem progressive. On its Opportunities page, Daksh states that Customer Care Specialists should be between 21-25 years of age and Team Leaders should be no older than 27. Early Daksh investors included Citigroup and we-don't-need-no-stinking-unions Amazon."

400 comments

  1. Re:Please help! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you really need advice from Slashdotters on this matter? --- 00-A3-B1-25-16-23-11-04-2C

  2. Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    When are they going to state that the workers have to speak english? That'd be nice..

    1. Re:Well.. by lawngnome · · Score: 5, Funny

      You just want everything dont you? back in my day we had to read manuals! and half the time they were in another language! *looks at his vcr blinking 12:00 and weeps bitterly*

    2. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "*looks at his vcr blinking 12:00 and weeps bitterly*"

      Just remember not to leave your door open when the movers come to bring the sofa downstairs.

    3. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "*looks at his vcr blinking 12:00 and weeps bitterly*"

      It's daylight savings time, you have to adjust it to blink 1:00 now.

    4. Re:Well.. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I still (barely) remember the days when technical manuals were written in real English. The manuals for the old 70's-era electronic test equipment (HP, Tektronix) I fool around with in my spare time are like this. It's really refreshing.

      Not any more. Even at my day job at a huge semiconductor firm, the internally-used technical specifications for major designs are frequently in broken English. At least they try to write them in English, unlike conference calls where frequently people start gibbering in Hebrew despite the company's official English-only policy.

    5. Re:Well.. by rah1420 · · Score: 1

      I still (barely) remember the days when technical manuals were written in real English.

      Back when I was a kid, we used to carve our own ICs out of wood.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    6. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, most Indians do speak English pretty well, courtesy of years of British colonialism. The accent's another matter though...

    7. Re:Well.. by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Back when I was a kid, excitement was buying a bag of mixed, unsorted, and unmarked transistors from Radio Shack.

      --
      resigned
  3. That's what is wonderful about outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If it's not legal in one country, just outsource to another where it is legal.

    1. Re:That's what is wonderful about outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like torture to Syria!

    2. Re:That's what is wonderful about outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We outsource Torture to Cuba!

    3. Re:That's what is wonderful about outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like torture

  4. Let's make one thing crystal clear by Henrik+S.+Hansen · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Let's make one thing crystal clear:

    The only reasons companies discriminate based on age is that younger people are easier to persuade to work harder, longer hours, and that they usually doesn't require as high pay as older, more experienced applicants.

    It is NOT because younger people are smarter or brighter than older people. And who says they are, anyway? IMO, any supposed loss in thinking quickly is easily made up by the experience and better problem solving skills of older people.

    1. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by SKPhoton · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It is NOT because younger people are smarter or brighter than older people. That's true. I think it would be safe to assume that older people would have more applicable experience and be more effective at the job. I think another assumption usually made is that younger people are sharper and more on the ball. But then again, that's just a typical stereotype as well.

    2. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by Roland+Piquepaille · · Score: 5, Insightful

      younger people are easier to persuade to work harder, longer hours, and that they usually doesn't require as high pay as older, more experienced applicants.

      It is NOT because younger people are smarter or brighter than older people


      Younger people are not bright when it comes to refusing to work overtime so much that it destroys health and family life.

      I know that often they can't refuse to work hard, because jobs are hard to come by these days and some other youngster is ready to take the place, but also it's usually illegal to fire someone for refusing gross overtime. The only trouble for young people is how do you prove you were fired by your boss on that ground in court.

    3. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you want cheap tech support that just reads a script and you're supporting Some Random Game or How To Use Instant Messenger Brand X, then you probably aim for young, cheap people you can easily manipulate and strongarm into hard work, harder hours and little pay or other compensation with the false expectation that hard work pays off in corporations and doesn't just get you laid off when you are promoted into a position that they can no longer afford to keep.

      However, if you are supporting mission critical software or hardware for a company with very expensive ($100k +) support contracts who expect reliable, professional, top-notch, respectable, hard-working employees who take sick days only when they're really sick and can be expected to return a page immediately and be on call like a responsible adult, you hire people with proven industry experience.

      I work in such an environment and I'm almost the youngest person in our huge (thousands globally) support division at the age of 28. Almost everyone else is in their 30s, 40s and 50s. Almost all have college degrees plus five or more years of experience and many have masters degrees.

    4. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is NOT because younger people are smarter or brighter than older people. And who says they are, anyway? IMO, any supposed loss in thinking quickly is easily made up by the experience and better problem solving skills of older people.

      Whatever you say grandpa :)

    5. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by Crashmarik · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      And the point is ?

      What your'e saying is undoubtedly true, you have missed the fact that younger less experienced people are more easily pliable with vague promises of promotion into management positions. Young people are considerably less likely to leave a job to retire.

      The question is should an employer be penalized for trying to use the best most motivated workforce ? Every time someone is hired there are numerous acts of discrimination. Candidate A went to a better school, Candidate B had a good personal presentation. Candidate C was 6 months pregnant and had a high probability of taking maternity leave.

      Companies have legal status as individuals and well run companies do indeed act as individuals. Their first priority is to maintain their own existence. If they don't maintain their existence its moot to argue about their hiring practices. This is something that the legal system would do well to recognize as its very hard to sue defunct companies as well.

      The only things that are legitimate complaints of descrimination are sex and race, and in alot of situations sex doesn't cut it. Yes ladies if you want maternity leave and pregnancy covered by healthcare it will get back to you. This is reality these choices cost money somewhere it will get paid for.

      The truly sad thing in this story is the whiny annoying horrible premise that underlies it. The shear arrogance that says yes lets go to the courts and have the laws of economics, common sense and if at all possible the laws of physics set aside so that a class of people can hold onto what they have come to regard as their right and privilege.

    6. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by NitsujTPU · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dude... What are you talking about? I'm young and work only 60 hours a week and travel only 85% of the time. ...so there!

    7. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 'job market is soft' is bunk. This has been going on FOR YEARS. The best thing that ever happened to me when I was a 'young turk' was for my boss to pull me to the side and say 'go home enjoy what you got, your going to burn out and your no good to me burnt out'. This was in 95. I have passed this wisdom on to many possible burnouts. Their productivity SHOT through the roof.

      Now here is the cool bit. When someone NEW comes onboard you can show them the way of 'no freebies'. The will see the rest of you going home at 5. As you walk by him say the magic words 'go home enjoy your life it can wait till tommorow'. 99% of the time it can...

      Overtime != betterwork.

      If where you work belives that there needs to be a fundamental shift in thinking at the company. It starts with YOU. Dispense no 'freebies' during schedule making. Get your co-workers onboard. Things like 'oh it will just take 10 minutes ill just go do it' does not fly in the world of 'no freebies'. Everything goes ON the schedule. If managment doesnt know its going on they will ignor it. If they know its on the schedule and still ignor it. Its not your fault. If you work as a group to teach managment how to do their jobs you can do yours.

    8. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes ladies if you want maternity leave and pregnancy covered by healthcare it will get back to you. This is reality these choices cost money somewhere it will get paid for.

      Spoken like someone who should have his dick cut off, because he obviously doesn't deserve it and couldn't handle the responsibility of being a father.

    9. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by j-pimp · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Spoken like someone who should have his dick cut off, because he obviously doesn't deserve it and couldn't handle the responsibility of being a father.
      Perhaps the grandparent post does come off a little harsh. Let me attempt to reply to this.
      Pregnancy is expensive medically. As a right wing religious nut pro lifer, my response to fellow pro-lifers attacking the AMA's classification of pregnancy as a disease is ,it is a God damn fucking disease!!!. A beautiful wonder miraclous disease that lets you take part in Gods miracle of creation, but still a fucking disease.
      Naturally, healthcare providers have reason to take into account that pregnancy is preventable. However, continuation of the species, and the rights to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness has to balance all this.
      With regard to maternity leave, it is basically paid vacation. Vacation is expensive for an employeer. From the employees side, it is a great help in the balance between work and family.
      Now, basically prenatal care and maternity leave are expensive. Covering prenatal care via health insurance partially paid by work would be non discriminatory. Being most jobs have a family healthcare option, it is equally expensive to insure a married man or a married woman. Civil unions and common marriages are a topic for another debate. So, yes if ladies want pregnancy paid for, its gonna cost someone else, but in this case the burden falls equally on employeers of mothers and fathers.
      Paid maternity leave costs the same as equal time paid vacation. Unpaid maternity leave is inconvient on the employeer. I work technical support. Being there are times I am the only tech on duty, it would be hard for me to do my job if my dentist told me he had to break my jaw and wire it shut for 6 weeks. In my particular situation, it would be easier for my employeer to give me a leave of absense, not have me work day shift on non call releated issues. However, if my dentist said 6 months, it really might be alot easier if I gave notice. It would inconvience me, but an employeers only responsibility is to make payroll as long as you show p to work and do the agreed job.
      Some people would say my employeer should be required to take me back, I don't. Perhaps its cause I'm young, single, and stupid. I would like to think otherwise.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    10. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where "a class of people" means everybody, eventually?

    11. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      With regard to maternity leave, it is basically paid vacation. Vacation is expensive for an employeer. From the employees side, it is a great help in the balance between work and family.

      More like recovery from surgery. The fact is that we, in this society, recognize that people need to have kids in order to continue the species, and that it's a good idea to support this. The only reason it's even an issue is that the dominant sex in business suffers minimal impact when they get someone pregnant.

      Some people would say my employeer should be required to take me back, I don't. Perhaps its cause I'm young, single, and stupid. I would like to think otherwise.

      More like young and naive. If you gave notice, who'd pay the dentist - oh wait, dentists aren't usually covered anyway. It sounds like you've never had to deal with being out of work for a long period, or pay for medical care in said jobless period.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    12. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Posting anon for obvious reasons. (This is about EDS, BTW.)

      >The only trouble for young people is how do you
      >prove you were fired by your boss on that ground
      >in court.

      Tell me about it. I got screwed by a call center (only work I could get) here after I got cancer. My supervisor told me that I was taking too much time off for appointments with my oncologist and should quit if I needed that much time.

      They didn't fire me, but they started screwing with my hours (I just can't do 12 hours a day regularly) and throwing red tape on the forms for the insurance company's compensation for the time I was off post-surgery. (I didn't ask for pay for the days of my oncologist visits, just for the two weeks after the surgery. Only thing they were losing during my appointments was one warm body.)

      Before long it was so intolerable that I quit. The breaking point was when my supervisor followed me into the men's room, then stood outside my stall and started asking me why I didn't provide an excuse form listing the reason why I wasn't on the phones two of my scheduled hours from the previous week. Oh, I don't know, maybe I was trying to take a crap or something!

      Another guy was quietly let go when he had to switch from cheaper (and nonworking) meds to expensive ones.

    13. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      More like recovery from surgery.
      Recovery from elective surgery. Granted if your insurance pays for missed time of work due to surgery, pregnancy should be recovered. I have a friend that had a breast reduction, elective surgery, but the insurance companies paid for it on the basic it would be cheapr then paying for the back problems it would prevent.
      Its definatly benificial to society that people can continue to have children, but someone does have to pay for it. The cost of paid maternity has to come from somewhere. Some sort of setup like unemployment insurance where employeer and employee both put money into a pool every month is probally a good setup here. More like young and naive. If you gave notice, who'd pay the dentist - oh wait, dentists aren't usually covered anyway. It sounds like you've never had to deal with being out of work for a long period, or pay for medical care in said jobless period.
      I never said that it wouldn't be a problem for me. Something like AFLAC where I voluntary take out an insurance policy that covers lost income due to work would be a good idea. However, its my responsibility to make that happen. Just like its my responsibility to go out and leann a skill useful to mankind so I can get a job and put food on my table. It would be an attractive benefit for an employer to provide such supplemental insurance as a group plan, but its not required of them.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    14. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Recovery from elective surgery.

      Who cares if it's elective or not. The point is that it isn't a vacation. Oh and since you seem to want to offer no support to pregnant women, we already tried that - that's why we have the maternity laws we have now. I'm sure you would love to live in a Randian dreamworld, but the reality is much like the worker's paradise that Rand fled.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    15. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you would love to live in a Randian dreamworld, but the reality is much like the worker's paradise that Rand fled.
      Ok time for this conservative to sing the praises of liberals long dead.
      I did a quick google and although I've yet to find a primary source for this Randian philisophy, it seems to be of the anarchist/libertarian variety. I'll do some research on this matter, but let me say I'm not a pure libertarian, I do accept the neccesary evil of government. I'll do a little more research and counter that argument later.
      Now deep down inside, people are good and helpful, as long as it isn't to inconvient. Luckily, people have this inate sense to accomplish things, that leads some of us to see the bigger picture and seek the warm fuzzy feeling of doing the greater good, inventing something, drinking imported beer, and landing on the moon.
      You can with varying degrees of success force people to do certain things. However, you cannot force people to change teir ideas. It is much easier to get people to change their ideas through debate, education, and allowing them to practice free will. You force people to do something and they comply at a minimum. If you show people a better way, you might auctually alter their ideas. Thats is the advantage of Free Market. Sure, there are abuses, that is where you minimal government comes in. To sit their and make sure no one loses and eye. I'm not saying never look to government to solve problems, just make it the last resort.
      If the above rant does soind Randian, then maybe I am Randian.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    16. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by metalmaniac1759 · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of one thing - the BPO companies have started preferring middle aged applicants over fresh graduates - due to the high attrition rate encountered due to the job-hopping nature of younger people.

      Older folks are supposed to be more stabe in call centers, et al.

      Nandz.

    17. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Spoken like someone who should have his dick cut off

      Don't worry. God did the next closest thing: Made him a geek.

    18. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by Fjandr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The point is that it isn't a vacation.

      Speaking from an employer point-of-view, it is basically paid vacation, whether you wish to acknowledge that or not. A paid vacation is where an employer pays an employee when they don't show up to do work. During paid maternity leave, and employer is paying someone who is not going to show up to work. They are, in fact, the same from a financial standpoint. They are also the same from a sociological standpoint: a reward of payment for services NOT rendered as an act of good will. That is all: an act of good will. It's an act of good will that has a real, definite cost. Someone will bear that cost, period. More on that further below...

      j-pimp never said that (s)he didn't support pregnant women. From a personal standpoint, it sounds like much the opposite. What it DOES sound like, however, is that from a political standpoint the parent does not support forcing businesses to pay for something that will end up increasing costs for everyone involved.

      Much like other costs of doing business, these don't typically hurt businesses all that much. They can (and do) pass the costs on to their customers and their employees. Customers in the form of higher costs for service, and employees through lower pay packages, slower promotion routes, and hard-nosed insurance administrators who discourage a higher percentage of insured from pursuing reimbursement.

      In the end, it's quite true that these things have a way of coming back around to bite people in the ass. Those people certainly won't be the businesses involved. While certain people are definitely helped by these regulations where they otherwise likely wouldn't have been, there are also people hurt by these regulations who otherwise likely wouldn't have been. The latter case just isn't done directly, so fewer people bitch about it. The fact that it's not talked about often doesn't mean it's a non-issue though.

      Personally, I don't find the post that started this all (the one that prompted the comment about needing his dick cut off due to some perceived irresponsibility assumed to be inherent from his own comment) to be very insulting. It really was matter-of-fact, and quite true. People who want certain benefits should realize that someone (most likely them) will have to give something up in return for those benefits. They're not free, so people shouldn't expect them to be. Those who are lucky enough to work for one of those rare companies that are run by people who care are the exception. It wasn't a case of telling people that they should sit down, shut up, and not ask for benefits. It was a simple case of telling people to wake up, open their eyes, and realize that there are consequences (good, bad, and neutral) to every action. One of the consequences to demanding health care of any kind (not just maternity care) is that it costs money, and few people are going to volunteer to pay it for you. In the business world, you can't keep from having the cost passed on. It's simply not possible. It will occur one way or the other. The original poster was simply stating that those looking for that type of health care (I would extend that to any benefit, period) should be aware that it WILL cost them, one way or the other, short term or long term. Just simple economics, nothing more. Sad that people had to get bent out of shape about it.

    19. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My dick is for pleasure, not to have some useless children. A big hurray for vasectomy !

    20. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by nelsonal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      If you want to learn more about the Randian philisophy, you should read Ayn Rand. Her magnum opus is Atlas Shrugged, however, most people (even those who agree with her) don't make it through the 60+ page manefesto near the end. Her writing style is most unique as well. The Fountainhead is another book by her. Her philiosiphy is a varient of libertarianism that focuses on the individual. As such her philisophy differs from libertarianism by being much more utilitarian than most bents of libertarianism. One could fit a person's value being signficnatly more than things into most libertarian views, while her rationalism places only the value of a person fitting their output. Even though I'd put myself squarely in the libertarian camp, I didn't particularly care for her work. Although part of that could have been her rejection of nearly all istitutions regardless of their use. I will grant her that growing up in Soviet Russia is likely going to have such an effect on a future libertarian.
      My own firm belief is that we should assign resposibities to the governement that they can carry out more effeciently than we can individually. (More susinctly the only function of government is to reduce transaction costs). As technology changes those transaction costs government should step out of the way. It's a nice correlary ot Coase's law government should expand to the point it is producing goods that cannot be accomplished by market negotiations. Odd how that works Coase's therum in as well. That guy was freaking brilliant. If I could offer one bit of advice to this year's crop of graduates it would be to understand "The Nature of a Firm" and "The Problem of Social Costs."

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    21. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by wildjim · · Score: 1

      I'm sure this point's been argued elsewhere, but: the whole reason for regulation and legislation over any and all employment discrimination is because the companies would otherwise always have the upper-hand in any employee-related dispute, and most companies do not act in anything like a loyal manner to their employees. This is not 'we can no longer support this position', which is a result of change and competition -- the employee also has the right to say 'I can no longer work in this position -- but more along the lines of, 'we don't care how much you've given in time, effort and expertise, while you have this condition or disability, because our accountants think you're statistically too much of a liability'. Statistics and lies, no common sense.

      So many people have bought into a management style that emphasises live to work, even if it kills you, and this esoteric and unrealistic concept of 'growth,' year-on-year, forever, that there is becoming more of an insistence on employees which fit into some kind-of super-human species, or the nearest to that available, that we're ending up with stressed-out, over-tired, and genuinely worried employees instead.
      The idea that a young employee will be any better than an older one seems to be based on the enthusiasm of youth -- which jades pretty quickly -- and ignores its stupidity and self-centredness.
      The idea that a pregnant woman being 'off sick' for 6 months id too much of a liability is very short-sighted. I've heard excuses that they'll decide to stay at home for 5 years looking after kids as a housewife, anyway, but it's no longer anywhere near as accurate as 30 years ago, esp. to the modern career-woman.
      The idea that your culture and its stereotype/reputation will be an accurate indication of work ethics for every individual is frequently proved wrong.

      And all this is supported by legislation and regulation because of the simple fact that people are too-often short-sighted, management too ruthless/over-worked/incompetent, and companies too focused on competition, profit and 'growth'.
      I am glad the government tries to support the people as a whole more than minorities and individuals -- incl. in the previous post's 'company' comparison to indivuals -- at the same time as trying to help minorities and individuals to survive and/or thrive. It's a balancing act that could so easily fall to bits, and despite the modern capitalist's support of letting only the strong and unemotional survive, at the expense of our humanity and neighbours, it'd be a terrible, Klingon-esque world if we didn't keep working on that balance.

    22. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      ... supporting mission critical software or hardware for a company with very expensive ($100k +) support contracts ...

      Actually, mission critical support contracts are typically MUCH more than $100K/year. I've seen contracts that hit the million*S* in cases where if that system goes down, that company is effectively unable to operate until it's restored.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    23. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by scavenger87 · · Score: 1

      There was this late ./ article about geniuses. Was the abvious common denomiator between them that their had done their most remarkle finding before reaching age of 30 and/or marriage? And in the professions where the looks is really matters like modelling most of the ppl are in their teens or early twenties.

    24. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From an employers point of view, "sick leave" is a no different from "paid vacation." And yet, we have these two totally different terms. How puzzling...

    25. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll bite. If the company is "unable to operate until it's restored" have they not thought of having a redundance built in?

    26. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by joshmccormack · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I think the company you work for is a rarity.

      Just look at it this way - if all these employees are expected to do is read pages aloud from a 3 ring binder depending on what the caller says ("Digital camera not working? Page 13....") do you think these employees are expected to be intelligent, experienced, and be able to diagnose a problem? I think they are expected to be able to read and speak.

      Moving up the food chain slightly greater levels of intelligence might be expected, but as long as the procedures are very specific I don't think the people at the top think they need top notch employees. They want flesh covered robots, preferably in large quantity, at a very low price.

    27. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by radja · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the US, but here in the Netherlands, they're VERY different things for both employer and employee.

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    28. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the Family Leave Act, and all that overhead that goes along with a 35-45 year old man with teenage kids that manage to start a fire, chop off a finger, or generally invoke some sort of emergency requiring Daddy's attention about once every 3 months. Apparently, people who really deserve children are the ones who can afford nannies to look over the little troublemakers during the day.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    29. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by spacey · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's part of the contract. Millions of $$$, right? Redundancy is only one step, though. If something kills one node its gonna come after N+1 nodes eventually unless you get it fixed fast.

      -Peter

      --
      == Just my opinion(s)
    30. Re:Let's make one thing crystal clear by H09N0X10U5 · · Score: 0
      Overtime != betterwork.
      Unfortunately, it does to poity haired bosses for whom it is the only way to 'measure productivity', which they have to do so they can show graphs and stuff to their bosses in long pointless meetings. After all, judging the true quality of your work would require them (pardon the management jargon) to have a fucking clue. I had one boss who used to time me when I went for a piss; another complained because "I didn't seem to be hitting the keys as fast as so-and-so". Wankers.
      --
      The post anonymously option you are [not] attempting to use is one that isn't available to your user.
  5. heh by SKPhoton · · Score: 2, Funny

    Age discrimination and Indian-style in the same sentence? Did anyone else picture a class of kindergardners sitting around indian style? Heck, I'd think they were unsuited to be "Customer Care Specialists" too.

    1. Re:heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Age discrimination and Indian-style in the same sentence? Did anyone else picture a class of kindergardners sitting around indian style? Heck, I'd think they were unsuited to be "Customer Care Specialists" too.


      Your first thoughts wouldn't head in that direction if you worked in Silicon Valley...
  6. Is this a problem? by Serveert · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is why we outsource to India. Less government regulation, fewer worker protection laws, fewer environmental regulations... I mean, are we to enforce our minimum wage laws on India? No.

    --
    2 years and no mod points. Join reddit. Because openness is good.
    1. Re:Is this a problem? by Pituritus+Ani · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Which is why when jobs are outsourced like this to circumvent American worker protections, the products of such labor (or the gross, in case of service businesses) should be heavily taxed.

      --

      Another proud carrier of the $rtbl flag

    2. Re:Is this a problem? by Serveert · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Should Europeans who outsourced to America tax American products given that Americans don't require workers to be near a window, don't require workers to have 5 weeks of vacation and can be fired with ease?

      Things are tricky. I lost my job to Indians but managed to find something more stable and well paying since I do have a good degree, do have plenty of experience, I am relatively young. But what happens when I get older.

      Things are bleak and cold and confusing, the only thing that is sure is people will not think twice about letting you go if that means they can keep their job or make a quick buck.

      --
      2 years and no mod points. Join reddit. Because openness is good.
    3. Re:Is this a problem? by forgoil · · Score: 1

      Why not just make it simple? Any outsourced job has to go to someone with the same benifits and rights as the worker in the country of the origin of the outsourcing.

      I can't really get especially mad if companies outsource to better workers, but since they are outsourcing to workers who accept much worse conditions I do tend to get mad. Are we really so eager to let major corporations throw away all the progress we have made to force them to treat us like sentient beings and not numbers?

    4. Re:Is this a problem? by pavon · · Score: 1, Informative

      This is why we outsource to India. Less government regulation, fewer worker protection laws, fewer environmental regulations...

      While you could make a case for this in some industries, like textiles, it isn't the major factor in most cases of outsourcing. The main reason that companies outsource is because people are willing to work for less elsewhere, and this is overwelmingly because the standard of living is lower in their country.

      As someone else pointed out India does have unions and wage laws, and if they think they need more they are a democracy and can pass more, just like the US did. So no this is not a problem at all.

    5. Re:Is this a problem? by Pituritus+Ani · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes--any country has the right and the duty to attempt to avoid the circumvention of its employment laws. The best way to effect this is to hit said companies in the pocketbook. The next step in the escalation is that the capital leaves the country--but then, tarrifs can be employed to keep the fruits of exploited labor out.

      --

      Another proud carrier of the $rtbl flag

    6. Re:Is this a problem? by Pituritus+Ani · · Score: 1

      Works for me--but then the purpose of exporting the job wouldn't be to circumvent labor laws. This would help provide the "level playing field" we hear apologists for offshoring talk so much about when jobs go offshore, but not with respect to worker protections.

      --

      Another proud carrier of the $rtbl flag

    7. Re:Is this a problem? by GileadGreene · · Score: 2, Informative
      I can't really get especially mad if companies outsource to better workers

      Better in this case equates to "same capability for less cost". Lower wages do not necessarily mean worse working conditions. In fact, from talking to Indian friends who have worked both in the US and in India the actual working conditions are equivalent. So why are you mad exactly?

    8. Re:Is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While you could make a case for this in some industries, like textiles, it isn't the major factor in most cases of outsourcing. The main reason that companies outsource is because people are willing to work for less elsewhere, and this is overwelmingly because the standard of living is lower in their country.

      Why is the cost of living lower in India? Because they don't have things like subsidized power or telephone lines. That's right, in America, you pay more for, say, telephone service so those people in the middle of nowhere can have service, otherwise companies wouldn't deem in cost efficient enough to erect wiring to them. America was once a source of cheap labor, then that changed after we put into law things like this. India is merely playing catchup.

    9. Re:Is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're equivilant because they have their own stable power grids, running water, satellite hookup. Go outside of the little fortress/island and you'll find the real india, desolate villages with no power/telephone lines. See, in America, we subsidize those people in far away places. It doesn't make any financial sense to help those people, it only makes social sense.

    10. Re:Is this a problem? by GileadGreene · · Score: 4, Insightful
      ...this is overwelmingly because the standard of living is lower in their country

      It's not so much the standard of living as the cost of living. For example, the film industry has started doing lots of low-cost production in Australia and New Zealand. Now, the standard of living in those countries is comparable to (and arguably better than) the standard of living in the US. But the cost of living is much lower, so the labor is cheaper. From what I understand of the situation in India the standard of living for Indian tech workers is simialr to that of their American counterparts, but again, their cost of living is much lower.

    11. Re:Is this a problem? by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And who will pay for those additional taxes? That's right, the customers will. Sorry chap.

    12. Re:Is this a problem? by Copid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here's what follows from that: Your goods are no more competitive than they were when you weren't circumventing US employment law. You're making no more money than you did when you weren't circumventing US employment law. Thus, the incentive to circumvent US employment law goes away. The customers are either going to pay for additional taxes or additional worker benefits. If the taxes are imposed at the right rates, there should be no difference.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    13. Re:Is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      250% taxes on revenue of anything coming from a department that's done business with any Indian or Chinese outsourcing firms that don't meet American worker's comp standards sounds like a good rate to me.

    14. Re:Is this a problem? by Marvin_OScribbley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And who will pay for those additional taxes? That's right, the customers will.

      As they should.

      --
      I'm not a journalist, but I play one on slashdot
    15. Re:Is this a problem? by FatherOfONe · · Score: 1

      I would somewhat agree with you if I didn't keep seeing ceo salaries above 1000X what the normal American worker makes. Will the upper level managers ever take a pay cut to help a company? For every one example you could give, I could give 100 other that will never take a dime hit.

      In my opinion this type of behavior will only produce workers who have a "look out for me" attitude. They will work only long and hard enough to keep their jobs. Come to think of it, this is almost exactly like the Indian culture. So those upper management types that screw their employees (I.T. specifically) will have it good now that the economy isn't good, but those same people will be the ones who will have employees leave at the drop of a hat and not think twice about leaving in the middle of a critical project, if it means furthering their career. Wow, the more I think about this, the more it seems EXACTLY like the Indian culture....

      So the way I see it, the real problem is greed. The top people will never see their multi-million dollar salaries with golden parchutes go away, and they will do anything to protect that, even if it means hurting the company.

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    16. Re:Is this a problem? by Barto · · Score: 1

      Great idea! That's exactly the kind of veiled protectionism I expect from enlightened slashdot readers who don't give a rat's about, well, anybody else.

      Protectionism doesn't raise the wage of overseas workers, it either lowers it to compensate for the increased cost or it means they lose their jobs.

    17. Re:Is this a problem? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Why is the cost of living lower in India?

      A big reason for this is that the local Indian economy is sustained by people who earn much lower wages. If you want domestic help you can get a live-in maid for $100/month. The guy repairing your car earns $3 per hour. Landscapers? $1.00/hr.

    18. Re:Is this a problem? by blitziod · · Score: 1

      why not just make it even simpler...start a company, hire workers in India. PAY THOSE WORKERS almost what Americans make. Then you will drive UP the cost of labor in India. They will no longer be able to undercut us and will have to compete on merit with equal cost. Oh, wait, that is exactly what will happen with current outsourcing.

      --
      The only way to bust a doper--is when you yourself become a smoker!
    19. Re:Is this a problem? by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      You guys require that the worker be near a window and give them 5 weeks vacation? Can I move there? Please? I promise if you let me move there I'll sit in the back and won't bother anyone...

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    20. Re:Is this a problem? by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      Yes indeed! It's all basic economics! For example:

      Example 1: Company hires local experts, fairly high regulations yadda yadda. Product cost $X to make. Company charges $Y for product.

      Example 2: Company decides to cut costs to become "more competitive." They outsource entire operation to a less regulated/expensive part of the world. Product cost $X - 50 to make. Company charges $Y for product.

      Example 3: Government gets pissed off that Company is avoiding local income taxes etc and tax company out the wazoo for their offshore operations. Product again costs $X to make. Company charges $X + 50 for product.

      Here ends your lession in capitalism.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    21. Re:Is this a problem? by FreeMath · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. The burden of the tax incidence may be placed on the producer, depending on the flexibility of the cost of the product.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    22. Re:Is this a problem? by Khazunga · · Score: 1
      And who will pay for those additional taxes? That's right, the customers will. Sorry chap.
      You're assuming that selling price is somewhat proportional to manufacturing cost. This is false. The selling price is the highest value that the market will accept, not the manufacturing cost plus some percentually fixed profit margin.
      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
    23. Re:Is this a problem? by Pituritus+Ani · · Score: 1

      It's not protectionism--unless it's protectionism to avoid the imperial exploitation of workers in other countries, which if they are working under poor conditions, without protection against discrimination and other crimes, and are underpaid, is what's happening there.

      --

      Another proud carrier of the $rtbl flag

    24. Re:Is this a problem? by antic · · Score: 1

      Dude, a les(s)ion in capitalism? You should see a doctor about that! ;)

      BTW, am I the only one that sees something moderated "Interesting" and thinks that there's a good chance that if the moderator understood what the post was saying, they would've used Informative or Insightful?

      It should be "+1 I don't quite know what you're getting at, but it *seems* like *you* know what you're talking about..."

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    25. Re:Is this a problem? by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      Normally not one to defend GWB, but he did stand against the steel tarrifs. And the trade organization ruled America in violation.

      You can not impose tarrifs anymore. World trade organizations will see to that.

    26. Re:Is this a problem? by Pituritus+Ani · · Score: 1

      No tarrifs? Fine, revoke the citizenship of those who ship the capital out of the country to avoid the laws. Let them enjoy the benefits of being governed by the tyrants in charge of the third world countries whose cheap labor they're exploiting. Oh, and make them subject to arrest if they ever set foot on their (former) home country's soil.

      --

      Another proud carrier of the $rtbl flag

    27. Re:Is this a problem? by Serveert · · Score: 1

      I'm american but I worked in Holland where this is the case. Same thing in Scandanavia, makes for oddly shaped buildings, they're usually very thin.

      --
      2 years and no mod points. Join reddit. Because openness is good.
    28. Re:Is this a problem? by Barto · · Score: 1

      How is such protectionism going to help them? Sure, they won't be getting paid $1 a day any more... they'll be getting paid $0 a day! Strike down those imperial wage shackles my brothers!

      Ra ra ra ra ra!

    29. Re:Is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Mmmm...5 weeks of vacation.. I would love to have that...I think I'd even take a pay cut to get that much vacation (I only get 15 vacation days plus 11 company holidays at my current job).

    30. Re:Is this a problem? by Pituritus+Ani · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they'll still work for less, even given equivalent protections to workers in the civilized world? If not, they're best off not dependent on multinationals for their livelihood, anyway.

      --

      Another proud carrier of the $rtbl flag

    31. Re:Is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or rather that's what will happen when demand catches up to supply in India. But right now they have a lot of workers and not much of a domestic market. It could take decades before India can support its high tech industries.

    32. Re:Is this a problem? by MurphyZero · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but you can remove tax breaks. Any large company in the US receives numerous, large tax breaks. And many of the tax breaks are very specific, so can be easily removed on a case by case basis (of course these companies place large amounts of money into 'reelection campaigns' or into lobbyists/outright bribes). So convincing legislators to do this may be difficult because it hits them right in the pocket. Otherwise, that'll work for US Companies outsourcing. Tariffs on imports from foreign companies is a completely different subject.

      --
      Our founding fathers removed the guys in charge. Be American. Vote incumbents out.
    33. Re:Is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ideally they'd go off and start their own companies, and build a domestic industrial base the way the first world did back in the old days. And then end up like, say, Japan. Feel free to point out all the abuses, strife, and protectionism that came out of that rise from third world to first, but that's one example of how things are supposed to work.

    34. Re:Is this a problem? by Openstandards.net · · Score: 1
      That would only be true if the companies taxed were monopolies or near monopolies, or the tax applied to the industry as a whole.

      If you tax only select companies in a competitive industry, then the company has to absorb most of the cost, as they can't change price theory.

    35. Re:Is this a problem? by jbplou · · Score: 1

      Most of the Western European countries put high import tarrifs on products produced overseas to protect their workers. So in way they do.

    36. Re:Is this a problem? by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 1

      Just wanted to add, that Age Discrimination isn't going away anytime soon in India. I can give you lots of justifications for this, but none of them will really hold I guess. It's just kind of like how Kevin Spacey wants to go back and work for a fast-food place in American Beauty. His manager is half his age, and doesn't know what the heck to do with him, and it would be the same in this case. Further, it's easier to teach a 20 year to take the rough edges off their accent than a 40 year old, and to imbibe a little American culture. By the time you're 40, you're not going change your world-view overnight. Yes, you've met lots of 20 year olds who are dogmatic, but most 20 year olds are also college going students, and thus a teecy-bit more open to learning. Second, you have the choice opf dealing between a 25 yr-old Indian woman as opposed to a 56 yr-old codger - who's voice is going sound a bit more soothing, and less grating to you? It's discrimination, sure, but it's not out malice. I doubt Hooters is ever going to pick up male waiters.

    37. Re:Is this a problem? by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Your proposals are just insane. They're a riot.

      Are you here all week?

      --
      resigned
    38. Re:Is this a problem? by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      The cost of living also varies widely right within the United States. Here in the chunk of flyover that I live in, I got a 1900 house on five acres of land for $120K. You won't do that in California.

      There aren't as many high-paying tech jobs here as there were the last place I lived, but I like having this chunk of land to mess around on. I just need another out building to store all my cool tech stuff in (there is still plenty of tech here to pick up at auctions, etc.) A small tractor would be nice, too.

      --
      resigned
    39. Re:Is this a problem? by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      The big one is that it takes a long time to be able to lay people off. As a result most companies don't hire until they know for certain that they can sustain the extra production a new hire will produce for a very long time. Go check out unemployment (especially among young people in France or Germany. Once you get a job your set, but that first step cna be a doosy.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    40. Re:Is this a problem? by anothy · · Score: 1
      Should Europeans who outsourced to America tax American products given that Americans don't require workers to be near a window, don't require workers to have 5 weeks of vacation and can be fired with ease?
      Yes.

      i'm an american, but i've spent the last six months (and will spend the next six months) working primarily in london. england's probably the most americanized eurpoean country, and even here the difference in work expectations and environment is amazing. i'll occasionally say things - like i work overtime without being paid overtime - and get these looks like i'm from some backwards, barbaric country. europeans should defend that higher standard of worker's rights against a lowering influence from the US for the same reasons the US should defend theirs against a lowering influence from India.
      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    41. Re:Is this a problem? by base3 · · Score: 1

      Insane? With the fox in charge of the henhouse, I suppose so. But just.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    42. Re:Is this a problem? by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

      This is why we outsource to India. Less government regulation, fewer worker protection laws, fewer environmental regulations... I mean, are we to enforce our minimum wage laws on India? No

      What makes you think so?Gov regulations regarding workers are strickest in INDIA than any of the NAFTA or EU countries.Once hired any indian worker is unsackable till the union gives the green light.

      Its the American worker who has less job protection and fewer laws protecting their rights.Here in UK they tried to force firefighters to accept new equipment,last week,and they walked off because their new pay wasnt in place.No ,they werent fired, instead the employers are showing signs of backing down.

      Dont assume that just because you live in US you are somehow better off Law wise.Come and live in EU for a while and you will discover how you are nothing but an indentured serf for american corporates.

      --
      Wanted : A Signature.
    43. Re:Is this a problem? by joshmccormack · · Score: 1

      Certainly, when you suggest to American's that something should be done that will prevent them from working, as well as protect some jobs, people will think twice. And some people suggest protection aversely affects the job market, though most of these defenses tend to breeze over details and suggest that all jobs are the same, and that corporate profits flow to residents of the corporations home country.

      But on the other side, shouldn't a country feel free to try to make global change by insisting that when things interact with them, and they can control that relationship, that everyone needs to play by their rules?

      People assume that the quality of life will improve where jobs are outsourced to. That arugement is frequently overly simplistic. Wouldn't it be nice to insure that it does? Wouldn't that take a bit of the sting away from offshore outsourcing?

      I like cheap stuff as much as the next guy, and I'm not deligent enough myself to monitor what I buy and where it was manufactured, and the conditions there. I think I'm probably the same as a lot of people - and I'd be a lot happier if I knew people making products or providing services for our country were not in horrible conditions.

      For instance, is anyone OK that child laborers are so widely used in really dangerous jobs around the world? Take a look at this page to see non soldier/prositution/slavery child labor.

    44. Re:Is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is why government needs to regulate the jobs that go overseas and regulate employee rights for companies sending work overseas

    45. Re:Is this a problem? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      You realize that that is "only" $30 million right! You know how "poor" that would make those guys?

  7. Nothing new here by cpu_fusion · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If you consider the working/living conditions in mainland China, home of countless "outsourced" wage-slaves for western industry, age-discrimination seems downright harmless.

    1. Re:Nothing new here by Satan's+Librarian · · Score: 3, Informative
      Definitely have to agree with you. Compared to conditions that the people building our cellphones and computers are living under, Indian support rep companies sound nice.

      At the factories I worked at in one of the southern 'special economic districts', it seemed like they just provided crowded dormitories and food for the teenage girls working the lines. I guess they could have been paid in addition, but certainly not enough to allow for any kind of 'upwardly mobile' trend or savings.

      Of course, on the other hand, it was sometimes hard to be too angry at the western companies, since it looked like the farmers in the surrounding areas in China had it a lot worse than those who worked in the factories. At least the girls working the lines got steady meals, a clean place to sleep, and some basic education (reading and writing abilities help productivity in high-tech factories quite a bit).

      Being a wage-slave for a multinational corp must have looked like the best option to the many peasants as well, considering that I was told - when watching peasants being beaten by the side of the road by police and I asked one of our reps what was going on - that people without the right papers aren't allowed into the special economic regions but that they come anyway in hopes of slipping in and finding a job.

    2. Re:Nothing new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because China isn't America.

      We don't just let Mexicans come across the border willy nilly with no papers do we? Well eastern and central China are like Mexico and the coast is like Japan. Also there are still a lot of poor peasants, there is a completely different history and culture. If they let anyone go anywhere, everyone would leave the fields and flood the cities and there would be a food crisis as well as cities mobbed by unskilled homeless peasants.

      The worst mistake people can make when looking at foreign countries is comparing it to America or some European country. Asian countries have such a different history it is completely ridiculous to compare China with American.

      Also don't you know about the child and slave labor in India? What about the people making your carpets and shirts?

      You think India is just programmers and tech-support people working for low wages? NO! There are peasants, beggars, child laboreres, slaves, etc.

      They're called "Developing Countries" for a reason.

      Besides, you think people don't get beaten and abused in America? But that's another story...

    3. Re:Nothing new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Besides, you think people don't get beaten and abused in America? But that's another story...

      Not as commonly as in China. But you're right, that's another story.

    4. Re:Nothing new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may think of them as "wage slaves", but if you pay them too much, they will just leave. As a matter of fact, I once worked on a project for a plant in Mexico which was having quality problems since they moved from SoCal. Why? Because their turnover rate was so high. Why? Because they were paid so much, that after a few months they would just go back to their hometown and live the rest of the year like a king.

      I feel the need to own things like a house, a car, indoor toilets, hot water, different clothes for every day of the week, etc., so I need to make lots of money. If you paid your average Chinese/Indian/Mexican peasant enough money so they could have those things, they would still see no need for them, and would just retire after a little while on their thousands of dollars worth of savings.

      Also, keep in mind that your average homeless person in America has a higher standard of living than your average Chinese peasant who labors hard every single day.

      aQazaQa

  8. Retirement: Whoo hoo! by ScriptMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cool. It looks like I'd be up for retirement on my 26th birthday (10 weeks from now) if I worked there. I'm sure the pension plan includes all the starvation I can eat. Famine. mmm....

    1. Re:Retirement: Whoo hoo! by challahc · · Score: 2, Informative

      You could be a team leader for 2 years before the famine.

      --
      01100010 01101001 01110100 01100101 00100000 01101101 01100101
  9. HR's business by fembots · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why do they want to make the age requirement public? This can be discretely discussed with the HR department and just filter anyone over xx age out automatically.

    1. Re:HR's business by kunudo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why do they want to make the age requirement public? This can be discretely discussed with the HR department and just filter anyone over xx age out automatically.

      Maybe they did, and someone noticed?

    2. Re:HR's business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think they see it as apealing to their customers.

      The young people are probably seen as being more trainable, etc -- an therefore apealing to companies like IBM who hire them.

    3. Re:HR's business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because surely nobody would notice that all your employees happen to fall in very clearly defined age brackets.

    4. Re:HR's business by tsotha · · Score: 1
      Why do they want to make the age requirement public? This can be discretely discussed with the HR department and just filter anyone over xx age out automatically.

      It probably isn't illegal in India. I'd like that better than what we have here - at least you don't have to waste your time applying for a job you won't get. In the US you still won't get the job, but they'll go through all the motions of considering you so as not to get sued.

    5. Re:HR's business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'd like that better than what we have here - at least you don't have to waste your time applying for a job you won't get. In the US you still won't get the job, but they'll go through all the motions of considering you so as not to get sued.

      As a former hiring manager in the USA, I can tell you that this is not true. It's not so easy to discriminate illegally in the USA, and most companies don't do it. Partly this is because the law is effective and partly because firms have woken up to the fact that discrimination by age, skin color etc is just bad business - it gets in the way of hiring the best people for the job.


      It sounds to me like you are blaming your lack of success in the job market on age discrimination, when in reality some other factor is responsible. Maybe you are not as strong a candidate as you think you are.

  10. Two points: by dncsky1530 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1] People start to work and have kids at an earlier age in India, by ensuring people are between certain ages, you ensure they will be with the company a long time.

    2] More resources on age descrimination

    1. Re:Two points: by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sorry, this first point here is a crock of Sh*t. Speaking as an employer myself, I will ALWAYS take more experienced people, whatever their age, over younger types. It makes solid economic sense to do so. Less problems on all sides.

      If I decided to take on younger people, the only reason I can imagine I would do so would be to milk them for everything they're worth, and then discard them for the next generation of suckers. And that is what is happening right now in India.

    2. Re:Two points: by Jardine · · Score: 1

      I will ALWAYS take more experienced people, whatever their age, over younger types

      So you'd take a 63 year old who just got laid off from their last job but will retire in 2 years? What about a 64 year old?

    3. Re:Two points: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      by ensuring people are between certain ages, you ensure they will be with the company a long time.


      Complete bullshit. It's rare for an employee to stay with a company more than 5 years in technical businesses. They move along to advance their career. If you want to be really sure somebody will stay with your company for at least 5 years, your best bet is to hire somebody aged 60.

    4. Re:Two points: by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      This is an extreme end of the scale you're talking about here, but funny you should mention that...

      My own father retired from being a police officer six years ago, at age sixty, started his own business as a taxi driver, overcame insane obstacles (including government deregulation that changed the value of his taxi license from 50000 to 5000 very early on), and is currently the third largest taxi operator in town, with no signs of slowing down.

      I will NEVER write people off because of a number on their birth certificate. And with medicine extending lifespan and improving health for the elderly at an enormous pace, I suggest you consider adopting a similar viewpoint.

    5. Re:Two points: by Frenchy_2001 · · Score: 1

      but then, if every business do like you, young people right out of college/education will never find a job...

      It was a bit dis-heartening to look for job and see requirements of 3 or 5 years experience everywhere.

      Moreover, some company need to train their workers anyway (given that some industruy are not taught in schools), so taking younger people allow then a carriers starting in your company. It is also sometime cheaper for a company to take inexperienced people and train them.

  11. Re:Please help! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Move to India.

  12. This is gonna get worse. by Orclover · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Im 32 years old (in a couple days), thankfully i run a small buisness network of 60 systems spread out across a city. But if my job ever went south again i always thought i could fall back into computer/networking phone support once again. But unlike 10 years ago it seems there are little oportunities for someone my age to work in such a field, first because most of those jobs got shipped off to malaysia and india (fuck you dell), and now because im over the hill. Seems to be yet another reason to hang onto my current job with a iron griop.

    --
    I am Jack's complete lack of surprise. -Fight Club
    1. Re:This is gonna get worse. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      When I worked at Dell, rumor had it that one of the Dell campuses (off Parmer Ln I think) would be sold off and turned into a community college. Basically, that's how much of their stuff is being outsourced.

      As for you, I suggest you look into other forms of work. And this applies to everyone on slashdot including me. The days of job stability in any given industry is OVER. Ya, I have a shitty attitude about it. But, can you realy blame?

      If I have too, I will leave the US for work.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  13. Nice theory, but... by corporatemutantninja · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...there's a simple reason call centers want young people: they have to retrain them to use American accents (actually, they teach a neutral accent they call "Global English") and older learners have a harder time changing their accents. Old dog/new tricks and all. Judging by the posters selection of links, I'd say he is grasping for ways to bad-mouth the Indians in order to keep the jobs here.

    --
    Actually, I was trying to be Insightful, not Funny.
    1. Re:Nice theory, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
      "(actually, they teach a neutral accent they call "Global English") "

      I've received quotes from Indian outsourcing companies where they could supply a staff of people who spoke (a) brittish, (b) southern/texas, and (c) american/california accents, and promised they'd adjust their style to match the caller.

      They also quoted rates for having the staff read the local newspaper of key markets so they could make appropriate comments about the weather, ball games, etc.

      This service was much more expensive than the competitor's heavy-indian accent bid, though.

    2. Re:Nice theory, but... by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      they teach a neutral accent

      There's no such thing. It is imposible to speak English (or any other language for that matter) without pronouncing your words in a particualr way. That is a way of speaking, an accent. Travel a bit, and you'll realise that "unaccented speach" is really just "the way people talk where I grew up".

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    3. Re:Nice theory, but... by corporatemutantninja · · Score: 4, Informative
      I didn't say "unaccented" I said "neutral accent" and there absolutely is such a thing. It's simply a language spoken without an identifiable regional accent, sort of an "average" accent. In the U.S. we have "newscaster English" which is neutral-American, and in the U.K. BBC newsreaders speak in neutral-British. In India they try to teach something which to American, UK, and Australian speakers sounds neutral. And they do a damned good job of it. I'm from Maine, and believe me they weren't talking "the people talk where I grew up." Ayuh.

      And, I was "traveling a bit": I was observing an accent training class at Daksh in Mumbai two weeks ago.

      Know of what ye speak.

      --
      Actually, I was trying to be Insightful, not Funny.
    4. Re:Nice theory, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This reminds me of the uproar when kids in Bavaria were being taught "television-german" instead of the good honest Bavarian dialect.

    5. Re:Nice theory, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
      oh... and forgot to mention... when tested, they were _very_ good. The same individual gave me his british accent, his deep-southern-drawl, and his california/neutral/hollywood accent. Each sounded perfect to me.

      His neutral accent sounded just like the "generic white guy" from any movie.

    6. Re:Nice theory, but... by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      It's a good idea; I speak High German fairly well, and I have lots of trouble understanding southern German and Swiss dialects :)

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    7. Re:Nice theory, but... by blitziod · · Score: 1

      how do you know they did not conference in some guy from Dallas, LA or London?

      --
      The only way to bust a doper--is when you yourself become a smoker!
    8. Re:Nice theory, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think "newcaster English" is Midwestern. I had a teacher once who claimed that with the ubiquity of television, we (Midwesterners) are the only unaccented English speakers.

    9. Re:Nice theory, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My company has offshored a number of jobs, and the preferred voice training for them is to watch episodes of American television. "Friends" is a big hit with them. It is supposed to teach them how to speak like Americans. I kid you not, next time you call for some tech support, see if you get greeted with a "How YOU doin'?" That is how I greet them everytime I have to call them, and it just keeps getting funnier, every single time I do it!!!

    10. Re:Nice theory, but... by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      The accent I had the toughest time with in college was a professor with a thick Greek accent.

      I grew up in an area with some old "german" farmers - probably spoke mainly german in their homes while growing up - and the differences in the tempos of their speech and the greek was difficult to get past.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    11. Re:Nice theory, but... by Jardine · · Score: 1

      I've received quotes from Indian outsourcing companies where they could supply a staff of people who spoke (a) brittish, (b) southern/texas, and (c) american/california accents, and promised they'd adjust their style to match the caller.

      Two questions:

      How would they know what accent to use when answering the phone?

      No New York City accents?

    12. Re:Nice theory, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no such thing as a neutral accent. Every speaker of English in the world speaks from a particular regional basis.

      As an Irish person, who lives in Australia, believe me, there is really no such thing. It may be that your ear isn't developed to hear the differences in regions, but everyone has a particular accent and it's never neutral.

      Oh, and the BBC certainly do not use an average accent. It's a southeastern English upper class accent that one commonly acquires from a private school. It's commonly called "Received pronunciation (RP)". However nowadays it's not a particularly common pronunciation style on the BBC. In fact, the Queen's accent has also drifted away from RP. The american equivalent is called "Standard Midwestern"

      The term "Standard English" however refers to the content of the utterance rather than the pronunciation.

    13. Re:Nice theory, but... by wildjim · · Score: 1

      I've heard New Zealanders and Aussie's are popular for certain broadcast roles in the US because when they put-on a US accent, no-one can tell where they're from, therefore there's no regional bias to the speaker.

      But as to the UK news-readers having a 'neutral British' accent, that's an utter fabrication. A lot of presenters have a slightly posh South-East or Midlands accent, but it's just as likely you'll hear Northern, Irish, Scottish, Cornish, Welsh, etc, etc. It's more that no-one really cares much about the presenter's accent, only that they come across as appropriate to that TV show's audience, and that they can be understood.

      As an aside: I've never heard anyone able to put-on a proper Kiwi accent who hadn't lived there for at least 2 years. It's easy to recognise an Aussie one, for example, even a Western-Australian one, if you've lived in NZ for long enough, and I'd say Aus and NZ accents are very close cousins.

    14. Re:Nice theory, but... by cabazorro · · Score: 1

      You mean like Homer Simpson?

      Homer: I'm going to the garage.
      Moe: Uh! La de daa how french! the "garage".
      Homer: "What do you call it then?"
      Moe: "The Car Hole!".

      Apu: "Hello Homer..How's it hanging?"
      Homer: "LowNLazy".

      They should hire Hank Azaria..BTW is he Armenian?

      --
      - these are not the droids you are looking for -
    15. Re:Nice theory, but... by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      I called the Boston Globe in 1989 to get a copy of the paper to look for jobs there. What I heard on the phone was:

      "Welcome to the BAAAH-ston Globe Circulation De-PAAAHT-ment."

      To my knowledge, there were no "h" letters in the words BOSTON and DEPARTMENT.

      Once you recognize that things like this can be added to words, then they can be removed, and then in that state of removal you can postulate "accentless" English.

      For the record, Midwestern American English is about as clean as you can get in the wild. I know there are still aberrations like "warsh" (i.e. "Betty-Sue, did you warsh my clothes?") in it, but altogther nothing so drastic as the Bostonian or Southern accents.

      Note that I may be using the term "accent" incorrectly with samples provided, but it's the overall flavor of the language that I'm trying to convey here.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    16. Re:Nice theory, but... by lazyl · · Score: 1

      "unaccented speach" is really just "the way people talk where I grew up".

      He wasn't referring to 'unaccented speech'. He was referring to a neutral accent. Even if you want to call the difference semantics, you'd still be running with your blinders on if you think it doesn't exist.

      The neutral accent is defined entirely by the media. It is 'neutral' because that is what Americans are used to hearing on TV. The news stations never use anything but neutral accent (except maybe a really local station), and the only time TV and film uses a non-neutral accent is if it is specifically called for as part of the character's personality. In fact, a neutral accent is required by film and TV so that they can exploit non-neutral accents as character devices. Actors that have a non-neutral accent almost always end up typecast into roles that specifically require that accent. Julia Roberts actually grew up with a really heavy southern drawl. She had to work hard with a tutor to get rid of it or it would have crippled her career.

      It's also important for politicians. They are best served by using an accent that is neutral for thier voters. The Governer of Texas might be able to speak with a southern accent (though I don't know if he does), but Bush can't. He needs to give the impression of representing the entire country, which means he has to use the neutral accent.

      --
      Aw crap, ninjas!
    17. Re:Nice theory, but... by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

      Once you recognize that things like this can be added to words, then they can be removed, and then in that state of removal you can postulate "accentless" English.

      No you can't. Not unless you convince the Americans to pronounce the 'h' in herbs, the 'min' in aluminium; get the Austraians to stop saying 'bar' like 'baa', remind Londoners that there's a 't' at the end of 'got', get people from the north of England to say "graph" like "barf" not "baf", etc...

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    18. Re:Nice theory, but... by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      I don't agree with you, but the word "herb" reveals an interesting treatment of the leading H letter in English. The trouble with a word like "herb" is that there're sound precedents for pronouncing the H and not.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
  14. Life expectancy in India by thedogcow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This poses a problem if they want younger crowds as the life expectancy in India is less compared to other countries See here

    --
    Yes! I listen to NYC Speedcore and do math at 3AM. I suggest you try it too.
    1. Re:Life expectancy in India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      life expectancy != Life span

      If you double life expectancy you end up with a lot of 100 year olds.

      If you double life span, you end up with a smaller bunch of 200 year olds.

      Assuming all other variables are held static (yeah, right) you would end up with the same increase in average age for the population.

      The folks getting these jobs are doing much better, health wise, than the mass of poor people.
      Averages for the country don't really describe these people - they are pulling up the average lifespan, and expectancy.

    2. Re:Life expectancy in India by gabbarsingh · · Score: 1

      Here is another fact for you to consider: Indian population = 1 billion w/ the current 'death rate', 'starvation', 'famine' and 'malnutrition'.

      Here's another fact, tetanus shot in ER = Rs. 100 (Doc's fee) + Rs. 7.50 (shot) = Rs 107.50 i.e. USD $5, mostly free in the Govt. hospitals.

      Things 'look' pretty bad, but it is these superficial perceptions that got us into Iraq. Wake the fuck up.

  15. reverse age discrimination by slothman32 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I'll probably get flamed but how come whenever we talk about age discrimination we prevent older people from working. We never talk about the fact that millions 17- people are discriminated all the time for all kinds of things ranging from big machinery to going to movies. Yes in many cases they might not be mentally or physically mature but they often are. I was mentally the same as I am now when I was 14 or even younger. And as an age many "older" people are just as "dumb" as younger ones. Sometimes people talk about needing a cutoff but we don't need one. Age just isn't related to most of that. Size might be for a few things but not most. They can't even vote but the law expects them to be tried as adults. Wasn't there a revolution about taxing without voting! It's isn't fair and won't be until children get all rights due to them.

    --
    Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
    1. Re:reverse age discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please tell me you're 14.

    2. Re:reverse age discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was mentally the same as I am now when I was 14 or even younger.

      That's because you're stupid.

      And as an age many "older" people are just as "dumb" as younger ones. Sometimes people talk about needing a cutoff but we don't need one.

      The laws are there to prevent parents from working their children to death, which they used to do, in mills, right up until the 1930s (when noone could get jobs anyway). Read some history for Christ's sake.

    3. Re:reverse age discrimination by Arcanix · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, this all sounds great but personally I would prefer not to have a bunch of kids who have no clue about the real world and no concept of responsibility be selecting who will run this country.

      The problem with 14-17 year olds is not in their lack of intelligence, but in their lack of common sense. I think the main issue is that the majority of kids do not support themselves and until they do the really shouldn't have much of a say in how things should go.

      I suppose I could possibly support a measure for them voting if they were not claimed as a dependent on anyone's tax return.

    4. Re:reverse age discrimination by servognome · · Score: 1

      umm so at age 18 you magically get common sense? It would be nice if there were a test that required you to demonstrate you had the basic sense to mark the right box... unfortunately like everything else it could be used for evil

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    5. Re:reverse age discrimination by Bodrius · · Score: 1

      I think that would work better than age discrimination in general.

      As someone said, while you could introduce a minimum criteria or "standarized" testing as a requirement for voting, it could be "used for evil"... it would never pass because of the dangers of class discrimination, or if it passed, it would very likely be used for such things... unintentionally, even. Hence most democratic countries lack a literacy restriction on the vote.

      Even a substantial amount of intelligence is no guarantee of common sense either: overspecialization can lead a very intelligent and/or talented person to be politically clueless (and easy to manipulate as a political symbol too).

      The fact is that even a college degree these days is not guarantee of common sense, or even of a modicum of intelligence.

      On the other hand, if you were not a dependant and filed your own taxes for a couple of years (or filed a joint-return with a spouse/partner), you are a self-sustained individual (and went through the bureaucratic hazing).

      Whatever common sense you were going to get in the first years of your life, you're probably getting it now. Introduce a 1-2 year buffer from the first return, if you want.

      If you are a 37-year old maintained by your family, you are not yet responsible for your actions, and you should let someone else in the household vote.

      This would have been a horrible solution in a purely patriarchal society with single-household income. But considering that female labor is not substantially blocked anymore (even if proper compensation can be), tying the vote to economic independence would make sense.

      --
      Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
    6. Re:reverse age discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was mentally the same as I am now when I was 14 or even younger.

      Thanks for stating that upfront so I don't have to read the rest of your post.

    7. Re:reverse age discrimination by oneishy · · Score: 1

      Age is not a clear indicator of intelligence. I purchased my house at the age of 20 (w/o any help) and that blows most people away. I've worked 40+hrs/wk since I was 16 (and I'm not talking fast food) and don't regret it at all, but it really ticks me off when people discount my intelligence because of my age, or because of the stupidity of some of my peers.

      The lack of common sense you speak of is in no way restricted to the 14-17 age bracket. There are plenty of *adults* who lack common sense.

      I agree with you, and say we should drop the age discrimination we have here in the states, and let those that care to prove themselves worthy do so, and those that don't care do nothing.

      If an individual is responsible, there is no reason their signature should not be legal, no reason they should not be able to vote, no reason they should not be able to have a checking account, or a credit card, and no reason they shouldn't be able to buy a house (if they can).

    8. Re:reverse age discrimination by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      Actually, child labor laws were put into place to keep young people from screwing around with dangerous machinery that was being built at the time. The concept of children is a byproduct of the Industrial Revolution.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    9. Re:reverse age discrimination by blitziod · · Score: 1

      actually work age laws where put in place by Unions to limit new entry into the work place and put upward pressure on wages at the time.

      --
      The only way to bust a doper--is when you yourself become a smoker!
    10. Re:reverse age discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that wealthy family with 12 children under the age of 10. Odd how they all work in the family business and are self supporting already, isn't it? And how they're all voting for the same guy that daddy is?

    11. Re:reverse age discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Intelligence isn't dependant on age, no. Experience is. The rate experience is acquired varies from person to person, but nobody is born with it. Part of the reason for the magical number 18 may be that that is when you're supposed to finish public school, and therefore you should have a minimum knowledge of history, civics, economics, etc.

      In the seven years since I finished college, if anything I have forgotten a lot of what I learned. But, I have learned a whole lot of things about how the real world works. Am I more or less intelligent now? No. But I am more worldly, and can vote much more intelligently, and make more intelligent decisions otherwise, because of experience.

      As for testing whether people are "ready", do you really want the government to start up another beurocracy to manage that? More money, more arbitrary decision making, more government control.

      The other problem is fairness. In the current system, everyone is treated equally ("all men are created equal..."). What criterion do you use to decide when someone is ready? Intelligence? Knowledge? Income? It'd be nice to say "maturity", but that can't be tested directly. Any criteria you choose will slant towards some people, and not others. It will then be manipulated to slant towards those in power.

      It may not be ideal, but at least the current system is fair.

    12. Re:reverse age discrimination by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Assuming you're seventeen now, you're certainly not mentally the same as you werw when you were fourteen. You might not be any smarter now - as difficult as it is to measure intelligence, it's hard to say anyway. But, you are certainly wiser and prepared to deal with more situations through your experience. I sure thought I was hot shit when I was 17 and got my first systems admin job, but now I know how much I didn't know then. It's nothing to be ashamed of, and it's nothing to discriminate over, but on the other hand, the fact of your age and level of experience might very well make you unfit for the position. Believing it's not possible doesn't make it so.

      Now, I agree that minors get a bum deal on the issue of being tried as adults. I do not think it is appropriate to give someone responsibilities without privileges. If you're old enough to go die in the desert somewhere, you're old enough to drink. If you can be tried as an adult, you should at least be able to own property, for fuck's sake. You can't sign a contract by yourself until you are 18 which means you cannot own anything, how pathetic.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:reverse age discrimination by oneishy · · Score: 1

      Excellent points about fairness being more important (and enduring) than the 'ideal' scenario.

      ... and no, I don't want the govt to decide if I am responsible :o)

      I think, in general, my complaints are more towards minor things, like not being able to get a rental car even if i am willing to pay insurance (or even extra in insurance) because of my age (when i'm, clearly old enough to drive).

    14. Re:reverse age discrimination by Cornelius+Chesterfie · · Score: 1

      You kids don't know what you want. That's why you're still kids: because you're stupid!

    15. Re:reverse age discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Recruiting young people, and calling the leader "Father", is a great way to build a cold callous Nazi regime where massive slaughter of innocent people is the latest trend. The nazi movement was largely started by taking teenage street thugs and giving them a united cause.

      It seems inconceivable that you could do such a thing by teaching these ideas to the masses in their 30s and 40s, although apathy tends to be easier to spread among this age group. Thus, the role of most of the middle-age people in Germany was to simply turn a blind eye, or let it happen.

      Interestingly, the reason the draft in the US starts with 19, then 18, then 20 years old instead of 24 is because it is easier to get them to kill and be killed without questioning. Over 25, it's pretty near imnpossible to convince people to do something that they don't believe is right. Older people would simply refuse to kill or die for something they didn't believe in, and would debate the issue until the morale of the military was close to none.

      I've discovered this phenomena in music. I introduced techno to many people under 25. But for my friends over 25 that didn't experience techno in a nite club or rave, I didn't bother. They tended to be set in their ways musically by then. I tried, but gave up. 25 seems to be about the age that most people determine for the rest of their life the type of music they like. There are, of course exceptions. But those exceptions are people that have adapted a culture of openness to new types of music. They are, in a sense, set in their ways of continually trying new music, and being open to enjoying them.

      The age you target has a lot to do with your priorities. If you want minds you can mold to dramatically new concepts, you want young people. If you want people with wisdom and experience, able to learn structurally, yet not necessarily willing to learn dramatically new ideas, you want older people.

      If you want to be fair, you'll create opportunity for all types of people to succeed in your company. This has been the model encouraged in the US in part by our age discrimination laws. Heck, we used to even have a thing called a ladder, enabling people to advance from high school graduation or college diploma to retirement. This is clearly changing today.

    16. Re:reverse age discrimination by slothman32 · · Score: 1

      Well I was 17 9 years ago. I though I was "hot" then and I think myself of then as "hot" now as well. In any case many people are good then and many people are bad when they are older. You show me 100 people and I'll point to several dozen that shouldn't have all the privileges they do have.

      --
      Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
    17. Re:reverse age discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh grow up. Literally.

      If you are prevented from working because you are too young, just wait until you're old enough. If you are prevented from working because you are too old, what can you do? Grow younger?

    18. Re:reverse age discrimination by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      That's right - you automatically get common sense enough to serve the country in the military, vote, and pay taxes.

      But you've not yet had it bad enough to legally purchase a beer.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    19. Re:reverse age discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, this all sounds great but personally I would prefer not to have a bunch of kids who have no clue about the real world and no concept of responsibility be selecting who will run this country.

      The problem with 14-17 year olds is not in their lack of intelligence, but in their lack of common sense.


      Based on your reasoning, the state of California should be banned from participating in Presidential elections.

    20. Re:reverse age discrimination by mc6809e · · Score: 1

      Actually, child labor laws were put into place to keep young people from screwing around with dangerous machinery that was being built at the time. The concept of children is a byproduct of the Industrial Revolution.

      Child labor laws were also put in place to prevent them from competing with adult workers.

      The problem was that big families used to count on children helping to support the family through their work on the family farm. This was especially true of many immigrant families.

      Child labor laws to some extent actually made things much tougher for these families.

    21. Re:reverse age discrimination by Bodrius · · Score: 1

      ???

      Have 12 children, fake their salaries, for 12 votes? Sure! That sounds efficient!

      It would be cheaper to just bribe (or threaten) your workers to vote for who you want...

      I) Having your children earn artificial income leads to very real artificial losses, both in terms of lost deductions, and taxes that you have to pay for your artificial income.

      Remember, dependants are deductions: it's the way the state tries to encourage producing more taxpayers... er, citizens.

      Now, you would have 12 single individuals, each one paying taxes for their artificial salaries with the minimal deductions... and the family business paying their own share of taxes as employer. Plus the legal and accounting expenses of making this work.

      Granted. You WILL have members of wealthy family with this kind of "artificial independence", but it will not be any worse than it is now: they will be adults, and it will be done to give them a work history and something to do after their expensive college is over.

      II)12 children? Wealthy family?

      In the Modern Western Society, a wealthy family rarely goes through the trouble of having 12 children: that's a very expensive way to breed political power these days.

      Children are only an efficient way to maximize power when their total expense does not include the training, education and social behavior that is expected, and demanded, from the upper classes to keep the same social level across generations.

      Raising children is expensive in money, time and other resources. Particularly if they are entitled to a bright, wealthy future of privilege because of their parents.

      When expectations are lower, and/or the state pays for most of the bills (basic education), it is more efficient to have more children as resources.

      Even in societies where the education bill is fully paid for by the state, having more than 2 or 3 children is not rentable for the upper-middle class, or higher.

      Not unless there are more subtle forces at work, that promise a different kind of political influence: social reputation, respect, tradition, religious belief, etc.

      Not to mention that there are a LARGE number of reasons your wealthy family ambitious for more power will NOT do such a thing out of the same ambition: dependants lead to tax deductions, government programs, etc.

      --
      Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
    22. Re:reverse age discrimination by anothy · · Score: 1
      I was mentally the same as I am now when I was 14 or even younger.
      Based on the post, i can believe that.
      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    23. Re:reverse age discrimination by withak53 · · Score: 1

      The law is written the way it is because it would be impossible to police minors on a case by case basis.

      However the loophole built into most of these laws is that you are allowed these activities with the support of a parent or guardian.
      Therefore, if you are ready your parent can take you driving or to an R rated movie.

  16. Shutup Grandpa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Or we'll stick you in that crooked home we saw on 60 Minutes

  17. This is bad even for /. by sultanoslack · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wow, this should get a gold metal for such a high number of mostly unrelated information given in a single article summary.

    The age discrimination IBM was hit with was related to pensioners having their benefits plan changed; it had nothing to do with hiring.

    The stuff on the Indian side of things, well, isn't really all that strange. The same thing happens informally in the US and in fact even the government has minimum ages for many elected representatives.

    But of course this will just turn into another "Oh, woe is me, I can't believe that skilled people in other countries are getting jobs too." (Nevermind that it's still much harder for an Indian with strong tech skills to find a job than an American.)

    1. Re:This is bad even for /. by phatsharpie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While I agree with you that the IBM comparison isn't valid, since the lawsuit is quite different from the gist of this story, which is the age requirements of hiring in the Indian firm.

      However, your comparison of minimum age requirement in US elected representative doesn't really apply in this case. The problem with the hiring in the Indian firm is about maximum age requirement. This is indeed troubling.

      I find it strange that people seem to brush off foreign IT hiring practices. Look, outsourcing is an emotional issue for many people, and although I don't particularly like it, it's nevertheless a procedure that is here to stay. However, we have to be somewhat aware of what these outsourcing firms are doing in regards to their hiring. True, we can never hold foreign countries to the same standards that we apply to ourselves in the US, but we get outraged when we hear about GAP and Nike and other apparel company employ child labor or practice any questionable hiring practices, why shouldn't we feel disturbed when foreign IT firms do something similar? Outsourcing proponents often point to the influx of income as good for these foreign workers, but it takes more than just money going towards these companies that makes the workers' life better.

      -B

    2. Re:This is bad even for /. by sultanoslack · · Score: 1
      [snip] the hiring in the Indian firm is about maximum age requirement
      How exactly is a maximum age troubling but a minimum one not? I don't see the fundamental difference between:
      • "We like hiring people over 30 for job Foo because people over 30 tend to be more mature."
      • "We like hiring 20-somethings for position Bar because 20 year olds have more energy."
      In fact I'd say it's pretty common practice in corporations to hire younger people for the entry level positions because there's a hope that they'll work their way up in the company. Who knows -- I'm not even really trying to defend this, but preferring people in their 20s for office jobs is hardly in league with putting 12 year olds to work in a sweat shop.
    3. Re:This is bad even for /. by Jardine · · Score: 1

      the government has minimum ages for many elected representatives.

      Why is that? I mean, you have to be 35 (and a natural born citizen) to become president. Why 35?

      In Canada, it is possible for an 18 year old to become Prime Minister. In practice they'd have to be the leader of the party with the most seats in Parliament (which isn't going to happen) but there's no law preventing it. The youngest Prime Minister so far was Joe Clark in 1979 at 39 years, 11 months.

      The youngest Member of Parliament was Claude-André Lachance at 20 years, 3 months old in 1974.

    4. Re:This is bad even for /. by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Why? Well to allow time to gain the necessary life experiences and education that will tend toward mature governance.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    5. Re:This is bad even for /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The youngest Member of Parliament was Claude-André Lachance at 20 years, 3 months old in 1974.

      You're sort of implying that he was elected because people thought he'd be a good leader, or do a good job representing them. Which is of course utter bullshit. He was elected merely because he was a separatist. Talk about trading in your values for a pipe dream.

    6. Re:This is bad even for /. by Jardine · · Score: 1

      Why? Well to allow time to gain the necessary life experiences and education that will tend toward mature governance.

      Wouldn't a democratic election weed out those too immature anyway? As I said, it's entirely possible for someone aged 18-34 to become the Prime Minister of Canada but it has yet to happen.

    7. Re:This is bad even for /. by Jardine · · Score: 1

      You're sort of implying that he was elected because people thought he'd be a good leader, or do a good job representing them. ... He was elected merely because he was a separatist.

      Do you think that maybe because he was a separatist, that might have made the people in his riding think he'd do a good job representing them?

  18. story text is misleading by poincare · · Score: 5, Informative
    From the article: A judge ruled last summer the pension changes IBM made in the 1990s violated federal age discrimination laws. Palmisano said Tuesday IBM hopes to win the case on appeal and avoid an estimated $6 billion in liability.

    IBM has discrimiated against older workers in the past, and they're buying a company that discrimiates against aged works now, but other than sharing the common feature of discrimination by big blue, these two events are unrelated.

    1. Re:story text is misleading by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 1
      story text is misleading

      Nah, it's reality which is misleading!

    2. Re:story text is misleading by merky1 · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is, the actual case involves retirement / pensions. Something about them changing the rules on how things get paid out, and not grandfathering people properly. One of my friends is in the group that was too young to maintain the old plan, so he is watching this case pretty closely....

      As for outsourcing to a company in India that only hires 20 somethings.... I guess the deplorable living conditions are only a small part of the outsourcing tragedy.

      --
      --WooooHoooo--
  19. Time to UNIONIZE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This is outrageous, yes, but was it really unexpected? With all these companies outsourcing American IT jobs to the Far East, there is only one soultion, one that will keep American corporations from exploiting their workers, both at home and abroad: unionization.

    I've heard a lot of arguments against this in my time (many of them on Slashdot), and most of them boiled down to this: IT workers, as professionals, shouldn't unionize. Unions are for blue-collar workers. While I suppose this is a nice way to think about your job and make you feel better about paying tens of thousands of dollars a year for a degree in Information Studies, it's ignoring reality. Perhaps the best way I've seen someone put it is, in reply to someone complaining about needing a buzzword-compliant resume, that such requirements should be a clue that IT workers are now a commodity. Like it or not, IT is the new factory worker of the 21st century, and if IT workers don't wake up and unionize, they'll get screwed so fast their heads will spin.

    Maybe the AFL-CIO or UAW would be up to the task? They're only a postage stamp or a phone call away.

    1. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by Noose+For+A+Neck · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Big Business has been exploiting us ever since the dot-bomb crash back in 1999. It's time to take out the trash and organize, use our collective bargaining power to get us a little job security and better wages. If autoworkers can do it, then we can do it, too!

      --

      Software piracy is victimless theft.

    2. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      Maybe the AFL-CIO or UAW would be up to the task? They're only a postage stamp or a phone call away.

      Get the Teamsters involved! Think about it: If IT workers were Teamsters, and there was a contract disagreement between IT and management, then NOTHING would get shipped ANYWHERE by truck. That would really be an issue for most large corporations.

      Don't rely on professional organizations like the IEEE and ACM to help you with your career. These are international organizations, and don't give a rat's ass about IT in the USA.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    3. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Not really

      More likely they will fire all of you and call IBM India immediately to run the wharehouses here in the states. After all this trouble the suits will make sure no Americans are hired again in their IT departments.

      Also I am desperate and would be happy to do IT work for 10 - 12hr. I will soo have it made. And yes you have to compete agaisnt me. I will refuse to join the union because I would want a job period! If people work at wallmart for $8000, why should I complain making 15k or 20k a year working in an air conditioned office? Do you think you better than those working these horrible jobs?

    4. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally do not understand why anyone would argue against the benefits of a union. The fact of the matter is that the biggest guy on the block makes the rules, unless others join together to oppose. Unions offer much more than fair wages and job security, It is much easier to bully around an individual consumer or employee, than it is a large collective power. Think about it people these organizations do not deal with you on an individual basis, they have CEO's, VP's and HR workers along with many other members of management further down the ladder.

    5. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except that this is really stupid and indicates that you don't understand the basics of trade unions.

      This works very well for truckers because you can't just say, "Ok, we're firing all of you and hiring Indian truck drivers." You can't outsource your electricians' work to another country and sending your car to the shop -- on another continent -- isn't practical.

      If anything unionization in the IT sector would just hasten the process of outsourcing.

    6. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Save your time and money. Labor unions are powerless to stop the flow of labor to areas where the cost is lower. Organizing or Striking have very little leverage when the job can be moved out of the area.

    7. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by GileadGreene · · Score: 1
      I personally do not understand why anyone would argue against the benefits of a union.

      Having grown up in a country with extremely strong unions I personally can't understand why anyone would argue for the unions. Unionized jobs were notoriously overpaid (making every product or service associated with them overly expensive), and infested with lazy incompetents who did little or no work. I still remember the strikes that were called by the transportation unions at Christmas almost every year - the best time to inconvenience the most people and thereby get their demands met. I mean, seriously, what kind of people hold Christmas hostage? I'm just thankful that the government finally saw the light and put through legielation that broke the stranglehold that the unions had on the economy.

      As an aside, did you ever stop to consider that a union is essentially just a big corporation with a monopoly on a certain kind of labor? (And tends to act just like a big, monopolistic corporation)

    8. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Thats just what we need. For the next 20 years all work will have to be done in Java, lest a union be responsible for re-educating its the IT professional workforce, all operating systems will have to be windoze, small time clients will have the teamsters at their door if they want technical work done...
      you are friggen nuts? Unions work for highly standardized pracitices that are resistant to change- is that what you want for IT?

      On the age side of things - most non-western countries age discriminate, gender discriminate, race discriminate (in Mexico its standard practice to include a picture on your resume). Are you saying that non-western countries need to adopt western laws? Are you we saying non-western countries are not allowed host a western owned business?

      Most posts on this thread are nothing than a big holier than thou fuck you.

    9. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny you should say that... the software industry probably relies on trucks less than any other sector of the economy.

    10. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by tsotha · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, sure, unionization works so well for holding on to jobs. There's a reason companies don't make many cars or much steel in the US anymore. And those industries have large fixed plants (it's expensive to move a steel mill). Where are you going to picket when your software job goes away?

    11. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by haluness · · Score: 0

      Just out of curiosity, where are you from? I have seen the ill effects of unions (I'm from Calcutta, India). Currently my grad students at my university are trying to unionize - and somehow the whole idea sits uneasily with me.

    12. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by bruthasj · · Score: 1

      Try it, but I will Fight Unionism at all costs! Using Unions to control outsourcing is like using unfiltered coal power plants to replace nuclear power.

    13. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

      The biggest reason unions have such a bad name is because corporations have much larger marketing departments.

    14. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by mc6809e · · Score: 1

      The biggest reason unions have such a bad name is because corporations have much larger marketing departments.

      Well, unions may have a bad name, but that doesn't seem to stop them from receiving special treatment from the government.

      Labor union officials enjoy many extraordinary powers and immunities that were created by legislatures and the courts. Union officials claim to rely on the support of rank-and-file workers. Yet, they clamor in the political arena to secure and expand their government-granted powers, including the powers to shake down workers for financial support and even to wage campaigns of violent retaliation against non-union employees.

      The following list of special privileges reveals the extent to which union bosses have rigged our nation's labor laws in their favor.

      Privilege #1: Exemption from prosecution for union violence.
      The most egregious example of organized labor's special privileges and immunities is the 1973 United States v. Enmons decision. In it, the United States Supreme Court held that union violence is exempted from the Hobbs Act, which makes it a federal crime to obstruct interstate commerce by robbery or extortion. As a result, thousands of incidents of violent assaults (directed mostly against workers) by union militants have gone unpunished. Meanwhile, many states also restrict the authority of law enforcement to enforce laws during strikes.

      Privilege #2: Exemption from anti-monopoly laws.
      The Clayton Act of 1914 exempts unions from anti-monopoly laws, enabling union officials to forcibly drive out independent or alternative employee bargaining groups.

      Privilege #3: Power to force employees to accept unwanted union representation.
      Monopoly bargaining, or "exclusive representation," which is embedded in most of the country's labor relations statutes, enables union officials to act as the exclusive bargaining agents of all employees at a unionized workplace, thereby depriving employees of the right to make their own employment contracts. For example, the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) of 1935, the Federal Labor Relations Act (FLRA) of 1978, and the Railway Labor Act (RLA) of 1926 prohibit employees from negotiating their own contracts with their employers or choosing their own workplace representatives.

      Privilege #4: Power to collect forced union dues.
      Unlike other private organizations, unions can compel individuals to support them financially. In 28 states under the NLRA (those that have not passed Right to Work laws), all states under the RLA, on "exclusive federal enclaves," and in many states under public sector labor relations acts, employees may be forced to pay union dues as a condition of employment, even if they reject union affiliation.

      Privilege #5: Unlimited, undisclosed electioneering.
      The Federal Election Campaign Act exempts unions from its limits on campaign contributions and expenditures, as well as some of its reporting requirements. Union bigwigs can spend unlimited amounts on communications to members and their families in support of, or opposition to, candidates for federal office, and they need not report these expenditures if they successfully claim that union publications are primarily devoted to other subjects. For years, the politically active National Education Association (NEA) teacher union has gotten away with claiming zero political expenditures on its IRS tax forms!

      Privilege #6: Ability to strong-arm employers into negotiations.
      Unlike all other parties in the economic marketplace, union officials can compel employers to bargain with them. The NLRA, FLRA, and RLA make it illegal for employers to resist a union's collective bargaining efforts and difficult for them to counter aggressive and deceptive campaigns waged by union organizers.

      Privilege #7: Right to trespass on an employer's private property.
      The Norris-LaGuardia Act of 1932 (and state anti-injunction acts)

    15. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

      First off, for all damage that unions allegedly do to the employees that compose it - if they don't like the way the union is run, they can elect new representatives, or if that does not satisfy the voters in the minority, they have the right to quit and seek employment elsewhere.

      Secondly, if "big labor" (as the linked page refers to unions) has so much power, why isn't every job everywhere a union job? Why has union membership declined continually throughout the years?

    16. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by mc6809e · · Score: 1

      First off, for all damage that unions allegedly do to the employees that compose it - if they don't like the way the union is run, they can elect new representatives, or if that does not satisfy the voters in the minority, they have the right to quit and seek employment elsewhere.

      They have the right to quit? Oh, c'mon. If anything, they have LOST their rights.

      Secondly, if "big labor" (as the linked page refers to unions) has so much power, why isn't every job everywhere a union job? Why has union membership declined continually throughout the years?

      Membership has declined for the simple reason that employers have left those industries where unions are strong. Employers have been exercising their right to quit and move to other industries where unions don't (yet) exist.

      Remember employers are there voluntarily. They don't have to provide a job for anyone.

      Really, who is going to want to work with people that have the legal right to commit extortion for example? No wonder union jobs have disappeared. They've driven themselves to extinction.

    17. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, unions tend to be best in modernation, and sans hubris - like most other organizations.

    18. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

      They have the right to quit? Oh, c'mon. If anything, they have LOST their rights.

      It's better than if there was no union, in which case the choice would be accept whatever terms the boss gives, or quit.

      Really, who is going to want to work with people that have the legal right to commit extortion for example?

      Heh, you mean like the corporations do all the time? Nobody, except someone who has no choice. Which is why more people are working intolerable hours.

    19. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      did you ever stop to consider that a union is essentially just a big corporation with a monopoly on a certain kind of labor? (And tends to act just like a big, monopolistic corporation)

      Oh no, but monopolies are ok if they work in your favour. Didntcha know? Just follow the money.

    20. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I haven't gone through each and every one of these points. I did find out through Google that the first point is deceptive - 1973 United States v. Enmons decision does not make violence committed by union members immune to prosecution, only to the Hobbs act. They can still be prosecuted under state law, for things like assault, vandalism, murder, etc. I suspect similar deception in several of the other points, but I'll leave that for later.

      The larger question though, is whether you oppose the concept of collective bargaining itself, or merely its current incarnation of unions. Whether you believe that workers should be able to organize themselves to obtain a better bargaining position, or whether they shouldn't have that right.

    21. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All unions do is protect the lazy employees who want to come to work and get paid for doing next to nothing.

      I've been on both sides of the house: in a union represented IT position and a manager of union represented IT employees.

      When I was in the union it didn't do much to benefit me. If you have the mentatility that you should come to work for the 40 hours you get paid and work diligently, the union isn't going to help you. But if you are a troublemaker and poor performer the union will be your savior. As a manager I've heard the union defend more ill behavior than you can imagine.

      Let's all just develop a work ethic instead of looking for handouts!!!

    22. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're nothing but a suck ass motherfucking republican dickhead! Go fuck a farm animal you wanker!

    23. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can consider all that youd like. If you've never been a member of a union it is probably heresay, and I am not talking about the likes of the Teamsters, UFCW and UAW. Those unions are very ineffective in some spots because the employees lack solidarity. If employees and consumers would learn to stick together we would not be stuck in a position where industry and its money controls not only our ability to put food on our tables but many government regulations. Whatever happened to by the people and for the people? Now we have a situation where some people in our society have horded very large amounts of money and resources, more than they or their family members will ever use. The only way that happens is if the people at the top decide that their comfort ... is more important than that of their most precious resource. And last time I checked there is no trade or industry that is completely controlled by unions. If a union does have a monopoly on work in an area it is because the employees and employer, decided that it would be that way. The companies I have been a member of a union at understand the fact that many times high level executives just dont know and will never know what it is like to be on the other side of the fence making 7.00 an hour w/o benefits as an employee of a company like Walmart while the CEO profits billions and billions of dollars a year. Do you understand how little the CEO would have to give to make a major difference in the lives of their employees? It is said that the biggest person on the block makes the rules... It is time that people realize that they are collectively the biggest on the block

    24. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      beautifully put :)

    25. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ? Unions do more than protect the lazy employees who ... those lazy employees you refer to are employees nonetheless and not only that they are union members to boot,(they are members of an organization who sole purpose is to protect employees rights.) You state that the union didnt do much to benefit you? Because I see in your statement that it did benefit you, but you expect some type of additional rewards for doing what you are supposed to do? If all you do is pay your union dues and sit on your ass waiting for the world to become a better place you let not only yourself down but your fellow employees too. Unions are just like families in many respects, not all of your brothers turn out to be the best and brightest, but typically when push comes to shove they are the ones you can rely on. Rely on any company that you are not the owner of and see where that gets you.

    26. Re:Time to UNIONIZE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make me sick. Instead of making generalizations about your coworkers and rationalizing about how you didnt really screw them over all of the times you brown nosed and kissed your employers ass to get a leg up. Why dont you get a clue that if you are an employee, which 99.5% of us are, an organization that protects you from someone whose sole purpose is profit is not such a bad thing.

  20. Then they can become H1-Bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So ... they turn 25 in India, ship them to the US to replace older worker here!

    Yay for Globalism !!!

  21. Slightly off topic.... but along the same lines.. by tonywestonuk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The best age group for IT related tasks will, at the moment be between around 28 to 35..... Why?

    Well, people in this group grew up with the likes of the VIC 20, the ZX81, The Oric, The 80's 8 bit computers that we learnt and understood like riding a bike. No qualification, or degree will ever match what we know, and understand. Where students now learn computing in Uni, or secondary school, get taught IT skills, we learnt it through love of it, at 10 years of age, or earlier.
    We are the David Beckhams of the industry, The Tiger Woods. Understand that in this era, we are kings, and our ability will never be surpassed by anyone just getting a degree, however young. I am 31, and the my best work (so far) has been in the last year or so. In my workplace, we have had people younger, but, though they can code well, they seam to just miss the point... They just analyze any problem, and apply it to what they've learnt at school or uni, they do not truly understand that problem, or how to realize the best solution.... and there solution is, well, ok, but never shows any innovation or 'Wow factor'

    .... Tony.

  22. India -- Democracy by d4v3v1l · · Score: 1

    In contrast to many of the other potential outsopurcing candidates, India is a Democracy and HAS Unions and Wage Laws.
    It's simply cheaper. Competition for Jobs is as hard there as it is in the USA, so the extra hours aren't really objected against.

    --
    - 1337poll.tk - check it out!
    1. Re:India -- Democracy by Serveert · · Score: 2, Informative

      Every country has worker protection laws, even China. Does that mean they're enforced or are strong? No. American companies would never be allowed to list age limitations, yet Indian companies have no qualms. So, in this context, the protection laws in America ar stronger.

      --
      2 years and no mod points. Join reddit. Because openness is good.
    2. Re:India -- Democracy by GileadGreene · · Score: 1

      Maybe American companies can't, but the US government sure can. You aren't even allowed enter an officer training program unless you will be "under 27 at the date of commissioning", or something along those lines.

    3. Re:India -- Democracy by Serveert · · Score: 1

      American companies cannot do this, period. The military gets away with all sorts of things like this.

      --
      2 years and no mod points. Join reddit. Because openness is good.
  23. If you're watching 60 minutes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be the grandpa!

    (unless it's football season and you're real lazy)

  24. Anyone ever looked at job ads in Japan? by dbleoslow · · Score: 3, Informative

    Almost every job listed will have some sort of min/max age requirement. You could even be denied a job based on your blood type! Having type B blood puts you at a disadvantage from the start when looking for a job in Japan.

    1. Re:Anyone ever looked at job ads in Japan? by sashang · · Score: 1

      Why don't the Japanese like people with type B blood?

    2. Re:Anyone ever looked at job ads in Japan? by jwave · · Score: 1
      Having type B blood puts you at a disadvantage from the start when looking for a job in Japan.

      I'm ignorant of Japanese employment-do. Why is blood-type B such a bad thing?

    3. Re:Anyone ever looked at job ads in Japan? by pedantic+bore · · Score: 1

      This might seem completely nuts, but in the good old USA there are many companies that use personality profiling tests, often based on debunked psychology theories, to decide who to hire and what tasks to give them. The faith that people put in these tests is astonishing.

      --
      Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    4. Re:Anyone ever looked at job ads in Japan? by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
      Blood type?

      Sorta like the Meyers-Briggs personality tests we have here then... or handwriting analysis. Who knows maybe phrenology will make a comeback!

    5. Re:Anyone ever looked at job ads in Japan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and blood type tends to go along with your race ancestors location on the planet. It means they want to hire west-asian people.

      If course, that's a very loose correlation these days.

    6. Re:Anyone ever looked at job ads in Japan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I was in Japan about 5 years ago. Many of the job ads specified gender and age. One even included the phrase "must have large breasts".

      Mike

  25. Re:Slightly off topic.... but along the same lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and I bet you can hit Randy Johnson's fastball too.

  26. Because they're children. by glrotate · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who let you in here anywhay?

  27. We can only hope for one thing by hemp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Renewel on carousel!!

    --
    Skip ------ See the latest from http://www.anArchyFortWorth.com
    1. Re:We can only hope for one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Curry-flavored Soylent Green

    2. Re:We can only hope for one thing by Pope · · Score: 1

      Bah, chances are it'll be on FOX, and just another crappy reality show on Tuesdays.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  28. Why?? by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    Hmm??

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    1. Re:Why?? by alannon · · Score: 1

      Most corporate jobs in Japan highly stress conformity. Blood type 'B' is associated with unpredictable and non-conformist people.

      Read here.

  29. Your mom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Your mom is unrelated.

  30. Re:Slightly off topic.... but along the same lines by Arcanix · · Score: 1

    Yes, you're right, no one younger than 28 has any love of computing, we're all just out to make a quick buck with our fancy university degrees.

  31. workers of the world by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    With good salaries, adequate benefits (including environmental protections), and growth opportunities, the American workforce leads the world. Merely taxing foreign products produced without those costs hurts American workers when we buy those products. How can we structure global trade (in products, services, and labor) to *raise* the standards of workers abroad? That will equalize not only the price competition, but also the worker abuse that translates into so many other problems that inevitably attack Americans wealth and health: war, famine, plague. Then we'll be left to compete on productivity, innovation and market appeal - where Americans will continue to lead. But we'll all be in it together.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  32. If only... by JonLatane · · Score: 0
    If only there were more companies like Daksh, we would never have to worry about outsourcing again.

    I feel utterly horrible saying that, but it's the first thing that popped into my mind.

  33. There is something rotten in the state of Denmark! by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    ObOntopic: software patents lead to Outsourcing. Indeed, rather than run the risk of being sued for patent infringment, software companies will prefer to outsource their actual development to places (such as India) where there are no software patents yet, rather than do it in their homecountry, and expose themselves to potentially expensive patent litigiation.
    That being said, if you happen to be Danish, please carefully watch the following clip:

    There is something rotten in the State of Denmark

    Ok, no matter what the issue is: please consider your national pride, your national dignity! Do you really value representatives that let themselves be shoved around, and give an easy yes, rather than defending your country's best interests?

    But the good news is, there is still a way out. Yes, changing your vote now may be viewed as an admission that you (you're representative) screwed up, or didn't know the subject matter. But it also shows courage and the willingness to correct errors once they become known.

    Ok, as a Luxembourg I must admit that I sit in a glasshouse here. I hereby encourage my countrypeople to do something about it, and contact our ministry of economy about the matter, and encourage them to review their vote.

    Remember: we are only two votes short of winning, and every country, no matter how small can make a difference, be it Denmark, Luxembourg, or even Malta!

    --
    Say no to software patents.
  34. Just More Of The NeoLiberal Economic Nirvana! by Cryofan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Thanks be to Milton Friedman, Presidents Clinton and Bush and free trade!

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:Just More Of The NeoLiberal Economic Nirvana! by Lacota · · Score: 1

      Hate to break it to you, but Dubya is a conservative. he'd be a NeoCon then.

      --
      It is not a god that would do evil biddings, but only a mortal and its limited knowledge would let such atrocities exist
  35. This is quite common in the third world by rollingcalf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They can legally discriminate based on race, age, gender, religion, or anything they want. So companies can limit their applicants by flagrantly advertising age, gender, and other requirements that would be illegal in the US.

    Businesses have much less regulations and worker protections than in the US and other industrialized countries, so they often collude to set artificially high prices for goods (although those prices may be still lower than in the US, due to the limited income of third-world consumers) and artificially low wages and working conditions for labor. And a handful of families control the majority of the wealth in the country.

    US companies that outsource should realize that the countries and companies that have a blatant disregard for worker's rights and fair competition also aren't going to give damn about less tangible ideas like intellectual property and privacy.

    --
    ---------
    There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
    1. Re:This is quite common in the third world by kaalamaadan · · Score: 1

      Sorry to object to this form of neo-colonial propoganda. Discrimination is a cultural phenomenon in India, not a legal one. In particular, the constitution assures no discrimination as a fundamental right. Whether it is put into practice is another thing. Lapses are largely due to the legal ignorance of the so called educated masses.

    2. Re:This is quite common in the third world by losttoy · · Score: 1

      In India, discriminating on the basis of race, gender, religion or *anything* would land you in jail!!

  36. Unions are dead by Grieveq · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is plenty of fodder in the above comments that could be remarked upon. (Bashing of US companies outsourcing jobs to India) But I think the current state of the economy shows that in the long run, the outsourcing of low wage/skill jobs to India and China is a good thing.

    "we-don't-need-no-stinking-unions Amazon."

    Unions are dead. Japanese car makers, Walmart, and many other business have show us this time and time again. Unions kill creativity, bring little benefit to workers anymore, and will only stagnate the company's growth.

    1. Re:Unions are dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some form of protection is needed for workers from their employers, though, and if the government isn't willing to step into the breach and pass reasonable labour laws for things like overtime, collective bargaining is all that the workers have left.

  37. age discrimination in india is legal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you would find age restriction for almost all government jobs too and also in almost all educational institute. my sister is a handicap and there was not enough facility in a village where she grew up (she is more than a decade older than I am). so she picked up her study later when we moved to a city. she was denied almost all job posting due to her age by the time she finished studies (and this included several govt jobs). The age was cited as reason in writing.

    I doubt there is any way to sue any firm based on age discrimination in job in India.

  38. If you want to keep your job by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    Always be looking for another one. Your'e employer knows in his bones that you would dump him the minute something better comes along and he has to be willing to do the same to you. Your best defense is to be continuously aware and in the path of other opportunities.

  39. There are still kids that love computers by SilentJ_PDX · · Score: 1

    Yes, there are a lot more "I did IT because it pays well" kids out there these days. But there are also plenty of kids who cut their teeth at age 10 on 386s and 486s and even Pentiums just for the love of it.

    If your employer is hiring more of the former, I agree they are getting less capable people. But that's the fault of your employer because I know plenty of kids out there who love computers and understand them as well as I understood my Apple IIe. A lot of them are reading your post now...

  40. Welcome to the information age... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Back in the days of the industrial age, older workers' experience was an asset. Hence the higher pay. Today, age means obsolescence, especially in hi-tech fields. The material taught in college cs classes changes almost every year. Why keep 30-year olds around when the kids out of college are better trained, better motivated, and will work for less?

    1. Re:Welcome to the information age... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The college kids are better trained?? HAH!

      I once amazed a young coworker by explaining what parity was and how it worked. He had never heard of it, except as a checkbox in hyperTerm. Not knowing a basic datacomm term, because his profs didn't teach it, makes him worse than me as a developer if the task involves datacomm

      Remember - good judgement comes from making mistakes. Mistakes come from bad judgement. Older folks have more of each.

  41. Re:There is something rotten in the state of Denma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Don't take it personally, but the Danes are traditionally afraid of taking a strong stance. Nothing personal, nothing specific to software patents.

    ... Not that they don't fear the problems, they certainly do, but they hope that others will cope with the problems for them, as they have before.

    So, realizing this, why should Denmark risk sticking their neck out, if Malta and Luxembourg are just as "powerful" to solve the problem at hand?

  42. Answer by Adam9 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I didn't know why they consider blood type as a hiring factor, so I found this:

    Personality assessment through blood type analysis has been prevalent in Japan sine the early 1970's. The Japanese term for this theory is 'ketsu-eki-gata', and is taken surprisingly seriously by the people from that part of the world. Books have been published on the topic, selling very well. In fact, Toshitaka Nomi has published over twenty-five books, and is considered the worlds leading expert on the topic. The blood type categories are used in a similar way to astrology in the west, focusing mostly on relationship aspects of life. Nomi goes further in his books though, even using blood type make up within a country as a theory for that nationality's general national traits.

    Japanese companies often take blood type into consideration when hiring employees, to ensure harmony throughout the staff. All the major car companies in Japan have reorganised themselves in order to attain positive blood type combinations in different working sectors. Surveys have been carried out to try and determine the preferences of different blood types, be it for food, clothes or any recreational activity. It is also a popular topic of conversation in social settings.


    More can be found here.

    1. Re:Answer by Trifthen · · Score: 1

      You know... you'd think a country as logical as Japan wouldn't be drawn in by this kind of superstitious crap. It's like France and Handwriting Analysis. I mean, seriously:

      "Wow, you have a great resume! You're everything you're looking for! Hell, you can have MY job! oohhh, I'm sorry... it looks like your blood type is B-. So sorry to waste your time."

      Yeah, like there's something people can do ABOUT THE VERY BLOOD THAT FLOWS THROUGH VEINS.

      God...

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    2. Re:Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Type O blood types are defined generally as warriors. This is perhaps because Type O is the oldest of all the blood types. These people are highly motivated, leaders of people. They aren't afraid to gamble because they are confident they can pull it off. They have a strong physical presence and are generally good at sport.

      So, I just look and behave like total a nerd, but in reality I'm a warrior hero jock. Damn! I wish this analysis would be more widely known.

    3. Re:Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you'd think a country as logical as Japan...

      This made me laugh out loud.

      Live in Japan for a bit, grasshopper, and come back and tell us how "logical" it is. Most expats marvel at how contrary to logic life here is. Here's a classic example.

    4. Re:Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Japanese companies often take blood type into consideration when hiring employees,

      Maybe this kind of crap explains why the Japanese economy has gone down the toilet in the last 15 years. Time was, when Japan was seen as an "emerging superpower". Now they seem to be shooting themselves in their feet ...

    5. Re:Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Here's a classic example.

      That is a GREAT example! It is AS IT SHOULD BE. Here in western Canada, we have so many idiot skiers and hikers getting themselves into trouble, then expecting dozens of professionals and volunteers to bail them out of said trouble, WITH NO CONSEQUENCES. Well guess what, we're considering charging these idiots for saving their asses. Not the true cost, because that would bunkrupt these neandrethals, but enough to notice.

      If you go into a war zone, and do not wear your military's uniform, you are asking for trouble, and SHOULD be expected to pay when it inevitably happens. With the potential for great profits (which is probably why they were there in the first place) comes a good deal of risk. Usually this risk is financial, but you can also put your life on the line. Mercenaries do it all the time, and they don't expect any government to put actual soldiers in harm's way and bail them out.

  43. Trust free markets by argoff · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If a company doens't hire someone because they're too old, then let them suffer the natural consequences of not getting the most effective people for the job. If a company hires a young person because they can pay them cheap and exploit them - make your own company, hire tham away, pay them more and pick the cream of the crop at will.

    Of course, sometimes companies take advantage of the system to expolit people, like communisim. Other times they take advantage of phoney property rights like copyright and patnet monopolies, other times they take advantage of false barriers to entry - like excessive regulation of the railroad industry, or RF frequencies. Not to mention our centralized monitary/tax system routinely rips people off, and locks people into the system when it comes to credit or money. - But from my experience, these problems have more to do with the publics poor belief systems than free markets.

    Moral: societies that have more libertarian values have more economic prosperity for the little guy.

    1. Re:Trust free markets by wes33 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      the gini coefficient measures the degree of inequality in income distribution (based on the Lorenz curve) [google knows all]. Sweden: 25 / USA: 41 (where 0 is equal distribution / 100 is completely unequal)

      Sweden vs. USA ; USA has more libertarian values than Sweden but has much more equitable wealth distribution; given that the standard of living for Sweden and USA is roughly the same, this means the "little guy" does better in Sweden than USA contrary to your assertion (there are many more examples and none seem to confirm your viewpoint)

    2. Re:Trust free markets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, silly, don't look at the facts, look to your economics textbook, the font of all knowledge.

      All hail the new religion.

    3. Re:Trust free markets by BgJonson79 · · Score: 1

      Sweden isn't large in population or area, nor is it diverse (about as diverse as NH, I'd guess). How can you really make a valid comparison?

      Are there any "first world" countries that have the diversity of the US?

      --

      There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

    4. Re:Trust free markets by argoff · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is, even with the supposed "disparity" the adjusted percapita US income is still 10K higher.

    5. Re:Trust free markets by wes33 · · Score: 1

      well, that makes the comparison unfairly slanted in favour of USA (to be fair the per capita income should be equal). We are assessing how well off the lowest income levels are, not the average wealth of the whole country. I think, even though the USA has a higher average wealth, the bottom dwellers - so to speak - do better in Sweden. Despite the USA having stronger "libertarian values".

  44. Equivalent? by gordonb · · Score: 1

    I don't know if you are being sarcastic. In India, while the cubicle may look the same, the employment conditions are not equivalent. There is no Social Security (although that may not be here for us either, based on current short-sighted administration and Congressional policy), Medicare, OSHA, and a host of other government mandates/programs.

    These programs do make a difference in employees' quality of life. Many were instituted in response to problems in the workplace (safety, child labor laws) that were not addressed by the all-powerful market, that totem of faith for the GOPers. In India, the Phillipines, Malaysia, and other outsourcing destinations, salaries are less due in part to lower costs of living. Standards of living are not the same, particularly when you consider public utilities (such as water), the health care system, and the hidden costs of environmental degradation. Employers' non-personnel costs are also less as labor and employment standards are not comparable, tax avoidance is endemic, and current tariff regimes allow, even encourage, movement of production and services.

  45. This too will pass.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The unemployment rate in India is huge and the young workers comprise the bulk of the population, as they age, the laws will catch up. Remember america was built by immigrants and returning WWII soldiers who didn't have much of the same protections.. as these workers age the social constructs will catch up with them as well.

    1. Re:This too will pass.. by hwstar · · Score: 1

      Not if India becomes a corporate quasi-democracy like the US. They'll lobby against all such changes.

      Mark my words, in the next 2 or 3 decades, the world will be comprised of corporate states which have a "democracy facade", but will ignore the will of the people when it comes to employment law. In such states, the only way employment law will change for the better is if there is social unrest.

  46. Scew Unions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They served their purpose when needed. But, like the RIAA and MPAA, they're obsolete now.

    1. Re:Scew Unions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not in skilled labor sectors like auto assembly and IT.

  47. Re:Let's hear it for Logan's Run! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Offtopic? Uh, hellloo, Logans Run was mentioned in the freaking article!!

  48. Ummm, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a very ancient and creaky 40. My first computer was a VIC 20. I'm also a very skilled software engineer. So, by your rules I'm too old. Thanks.

    -Scott

    1. Re:Ummm, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, you are a coward.

  49. I don't think you know what unions can do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't tell you how many guys we've hired that could talk a good game and the credentials (MCSE), but were useless. A good union could help the employees and the employers if done right.

  50. ebonics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wonder if they could speak ebonics for the rapper demographic.

    1. Re:ebonics? by ragecgi · · Score: 0

      Yeah Boyeeee!!!
      We got yo new fly IBM server in da hizouse yo!

  51. Quite common in that part of the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually it is quite common in India and Pakistan . You see job ads that explicitly list an age and that require you to furnish a recent picture!!!!. I mean imagine this "ABC Ltd. require a developer with skills in X, Y, and Z. The applicant must be below the age of 30. Please send your resume with two recent photographs to XXXX".
    One of the most hilarious things that I saw was when a research institute that is "...committed to organising professional research, policy studies, and seminars in the area of human development." placed a job ad on their website stating that the applicant needs to be below the age of 25 . If a body that does research in human development and should know better engages in such practices, what is to be expected of others. Oh well, I am glad I am out of that mess.

  52. Re:Slightly off topic.... but along the same lines by djplurvert · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Frankly, in some industries, you're too young. I cut my teeth (as a teenager) on a KIM-1 and what I remember about the VIC20/ZX80 crowd is you're afraid of hardware.

    We use to refer to you lot as the "appliance computer users".

    I've found my familiarty with hardware/electronics to be an EXTREME asset in the embedded market.

    plurvert

  53. You've obviously never worked in a union shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't let non-union workers become employed at union shops, that's part of their employment contract. And it's not as if a union is necessarily made up of just one specific trade. Imagine screwing over the IT workers and having your truckers go on strike. But I'm sure you'd enjoy pissing away the rest of your young life working 12 hour days for pathetic compensation before you are unceremoniously fired in the next round of layoffs.

    1. Re:You've obviously never worked in a union shop by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      If you work next to nothing you wont be fired.

      Also mexicans with H1B1 Visa's will happily take over the trucking then for a fraction of the cost. They could save even more money!

      Globalism is here and it wont go away. Union shops go under first or outsource first. They have to our the shareholders will fire the CEO. If we all worked for 25-40k a year without complaining they would not look at India. We need to compete with them and they offer a better service for a cheaper price.

      Right now I live at home with my parents and go to school again since no IT shop will hire me anyway. I make 5k a year working part time to pay for school. 12/hr is a huge amount of money for me. As people become unemployed and the value of the dollar falls, so does demand. It will equal itself out and I hate to bother your standard of living but right now many like me have nothing. Whats to lose?

    2. Re:You've obviously never worked in a union shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have worked with unions before. The comments you've made are nothing more than uneducated guesses. I know of many "union shops" that would not run their business in any other way. When Americans finally decide to join together and take a stand against the bully that menaces us all is when change will begin to happen. Just as your view of the world and employment will change when you move out of your parents house and learn that when you give in to a bully the next time he comes around you better be willing to take a stand or give up even more than you did in the past.

    3. Re:You've obviously never worked in a union shop by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1



      Go tell that to the grocery store chains who have to compete agianst walmart in so california. The economist has quite a few articles on it.

      Do I want to make good money? Hell yes! Will it happen? I am very skeptical after being outsourced already. Fact of the matter is during the 1990's we were heavily overcompensated. Businesses have a right to their shareholders to look for the lowest cost. Yes unions brought down the steel industry. My father worked for American steel for years. He loved his union job which paid for school but it led to their demise. The Chinesse could make it for a fraction of the cost and they undercut them!

      Walmart and Target are also undermining unions in the food and retail sector. WIth globalism you just can't win. Its designed to help the top 2% at the expensive of the rest. If we vote for politicians with anti trade policies, all the companies will move their whole operations offshore. You can't win.

      Considering competition was limited in our fields now its time for a reverse. Also with stock prices rising thanks for paying employee's less wealth for those in the top middle class and upper class has been created. The economist says for every job lost 2 are created! I will plainly offer my services to any company to compete with an Indian. Its time you did hte same for permanent job security. No businesses are not bullying. Just looking for value. If you give in what they want they will like you. Remember busineses dont like laying people off and firing them unless they have to.

    4. Re:You've obviously never worked in a union shop by H09N0X10U5 · · Score: 0
      The economist says for every job lost 2 are created!
      That would be the CEOs of the corporations spending their extra income by hiring gardeners & maids.
      --
      The post anonymously option you are [not] attempting to use is one that isn't available to your user.
    5. Re:You've obviously never worked in a union shop by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Now its more money for marketing agencies and more managers. They are expensive and programmers and call centers soaked up all the money before.

      Now they have more money in their pockets to do other things.

  54. Wouldnt the title be considered racist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry to induce a flame war, but One companies hiring practices don't define an entire country's.
    So how would this constitute an Indian style?

    I can imagine someone arguing : " The entire country is lawless" or "they don't have labor laws" And then using this as a staging ground to make the argument that there is a distinctive "Indian style" when it comes to labor recruitment.
    But then what about all the other third world countries?

    I feel that this IS a racist title(title).

  55. Re:Slightly off topic.... but along the same lines by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1


    I think that anyone who went through school with a calculator is mentally unprepared. I've seen far too many people unable to do simple arithmetic without having to dig out a calculator.

    To be honest I haven't found age discrimination to be a problem - I'm 54 and recently found myself unemployed through the failure of the company I was working for. I was able to get a series of pretty good offers as a senior level Java programmer within a couple of months. Pretty much all anyone asked about was my skillset. If you keep yourself up to date you should be able to find work.

  56. The *counbtry* does not have any rights... by PaulBu · · Score: 1

    ... only *indivuduals* do. Countries have duties to their citizens, the extent of those can vary, but at least should include military protection and keeping "law and order" and (I personally very much agree with Libertarins on this one) not too much else.

    When you start saying that "countries" have rights of their own it is pretty much a start on a slippery slope to Communist/Nazi regimes. (BTW, I've lived unter the former one).

    Paul B.

    1. Re:The *counbtry* does not have any rights... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      WTF are you talking about? A country's government has a duty to follow the will of its citizens, and to protect its citizens. If the citizens are being harmed by companies inside or outside that country, the government can do whatever it wishes within its own borders. For companies inside, there are no limits beyond the laws. For companies outside, they have every right to restrict imports and impose tariffs.

      Suggesting that a government doesn't have any rights beyond military and police is ridiculous.

    2. Re:The *counbtry* does not have any rights... by PaulBu · · Score: 1

      If the government can do whatever it wishes within its own borders.

      This is where we disagree (and where that slippery slope begins) -- what the gov't can do is limited by (at least) the Constitution (I assume we are taking about the USA here). Or do you think the Gov't can arbitrary decide to, for example, throw in jail (or execute) people who want to, say, trade in the currency other than the official state currency? (It is an actual example, back in the old Soviet Union in 80s one could easily get a jail sentence for keeping/using USD, and people were accused of "economic sabotage" and executed for not much more than that). Do you REALLY want to give your Gov't that "right"?

      Suggesting that a government doesn't have any rights beyond military and police is ridiculous.

      Yet, some not too stupid people suggest just that.

      Anyway, maybe you will find some of this more relevant to the current discussion.

      Paul B.

    3. Re:The *counbtry* does not have any rights... by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      dude, you need to read more Michael Moore or Lou Dubose if you think that the purpose of the government is to protect and serve the citizens... The government is there to make the big bidness bosses even richer....

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    4. Re:The *counbtry* does not have any rights... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about what governments are supposed to be doing. Obviously, what they do in reality is something altogether different much of the time, especially in the USA.

  57. Feminist would freak by JGski · · Score: 4, Insightful
    What's allowed in most developing countries would make your head spin.

    In the Philippines, it is customary to include on your resume: age, religion, marital status, weight, height, a recent photograph, and if female, "measurements". If you don't, you probably won't be considered. The age of being "past your prime" is about age 25, professionally and maritally. You can be summarily rejected for employment for any of the above parameter values - being muslim as always been a strike against in the Catholic Philippines. Not being of the right sex or not being "pretty enough" to "decorate" the office is pretty common.

    I'm sure other countries are similar. USian companies are required to follow the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; I wonder if it could apply to foreign age discrimination of subcontractors and subsidiaries?

    1. Re:Feminist would freak by martinX · · Score: 1

      Do we really have such short memories? It was customary in a lot of countries to include many of those attributes on a resume. Except for measurements.

      I can even remember including 'hobbies' on resumes in the past. "Reading, listening to music"... sounded like a bloody ad for the personal column.

      The point is, we in the "enlightened West" are only one generation removed from what we are condemning others for. If you want to, 'encourage' the local companies not to outsource to others that support these practices, but don't feel all superior and smug. After all, if these discriminatory practices were so obviously wrong, then they wouldn't have to be legislated against in our own countries, we would instinctively know them to be wrong.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    2. Re:Feminist would freak by Brandybuck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Probably why the Phillipines are not an economic powerhouse... "I see you're a Rhodes scholar and MacArthur Grant Recipient, Miss Domingo. However you only wear a B-cup, so we cannot hire you at this time."

      I can understand (but not necessarily agree) wanting a young pretty woman for your receptionist, but it's economically stupid to demand them everywhere else.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    3. Re:Feminist would freak by martinX · · Score: 1

      Rule for a happy marriage: always let your wife hire your secretary.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    4. Re:Feminist would freak by greggman · · Score: 1

      Japan is exactly the same and they are an economic powerhouse.

    5. Re:Feminist would freak by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Why not just make it a law that states something like...

      "All US based corporations must adhere to the laws in place for all US employees and employees based in another country"

      In other words, if Dell out sources to Wipro in India, the employees must have legal employment protection of the US even if India doesn't recognize them.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    6. Re:Feminist would freak by idril · · Score: 1

      I live in the Philippines and have worked for two US-based multinationals. I'm a hiring manager (in IT) for one of those multinationals right now.

      I agree what you've described sometimes applies at small or old-style firms. Newer generations of management (there's that youth thing again =) ) who are better educated don't care about things like measurements, religion, marital status, weight or height.

      A lot of times age still matters. Or its popular proxy, years of work experience.

      It's funny though. I never cared about the sex of an applicant until our company (rolling out policies developed in the US) started tracking male/female diversity. Then I had to make sure my organization balanced out.

    7. Re:Feminist would freak by evalencia1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, women have a greater presence in upper management in the Philippines than in more developed economies like Australia. (I'm from the Phils. but now live in Oz)

      The Philippines is an economic basketcase not because of sexual discrimination in workplaces but because of **much** bigger reasons. Corruption would be near the top of the list. The Philippines holds the dubious honour of having two entries in the top 10 most corrupt leaders in recent history - http://au.news.yahoo.com/040325/19/oa9p.html.

      Then good ole political instability would also be there - president pissing you off? march in the streets and get rid of the f*cker directly! or stage a coup attempt, if you're from the military. Underdeveloped or non-existent local industries, crippling foreign debt... oh, the list can go on for days! :)

    8. Re:Feminist would freak by JGski · · Score: 1

      Things can change quickly in the Philippines. The first time I was there in the 1980s, getting a phone on your own home was akin to the Soviet Union - wait until someone died in the neighborhood so your number in wait-list at the PLDT would advance. Then in the 1990s suddenly all my relatives had their own phones (cellular handset or table-top). ATMs and credit cards made a similar leap from unavailability/unusability to proliferation/US-style ease of use.

    9. Re:Feminist would freak by JGski · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Perhaps, though, often enough the "pretty one" might well have degrees qualifying her above the position she's apply for. Also the Philippines GDP was twice that of the US in 2002, so maybe it is a powerhouse compared to the US. ;-)

      Part of the attractiveness of the Philippines for outsourcing is that there are many tens of thousands of college graduates either unemployeed or underemployed (architects doing ditch-digging, engineers pumping gas, nurses working as secretaries, etc. and even more living with family unable to find work) The literacy rate in the Philippines is nearly the same as the US, probably with a higher per-capita college degree rate.

      IMNSHO, much of this is caused by the Catholic Church (yes, I was raised Catholic and attended Catholic grad school) which has prevented meaningful population control (divorce is still illegal but largely ignored via separation as de facto divorce and mistresses/affairs, and until Aquino condoms and birth control were quasi-illegal; previously available due presence of US bases only). The islands have limited natural resources, insufficient for the population levels. The church still routinely tells people every sunday to "go forth and multiply; God will provide". Rubbish unless poverty, early death and misery are what you had in mind for "providing".

      The other element is corruption. Even Cory Aquino exempted her own family land holdings when land reform was forced upon all the other major wealthy land owners under her adminstration. The US has just as much corruption only we have institutionalized it as campaign contributions and PACS which helps to limit the scope and obviousness. You are not blatantly asked for bribes trying to get government or commercial services, but the option is available in the US through the right channels.

      It's an eye-opening experience to spend time in a developing nation - most our current national (US) stupidity is perpetrated by people who have obviously never done so. Hopefully our Christian Taliban doesn't get the chance to take the US there.

    10. Re:Feminist would freak by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Japan has lost it's status as an economic powerhouse. The only reason they had it in the past was their near-religious loyalty to the company. But that's slipping away and they can no longer afford to treat half of their population as merely a pretty face.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    11. Re:Feminist would freak by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      IMNSHO, much of this is caused by the Catholic Church

      BS. You cannot blame this on Catholicism, because there are dozens of poor overpopulated nations without significant Catholic populations.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    12. Re:Feminist would freak by JGski · · Score: 1
      Your logic is flawed. Let's translate what you said into more familar nouns and verbs:

      Many big companies write bad software, but those companies aren't Microsoft, therefore Microsoft can't write bad code.

      I never claimed that Catholicism is the cause of all improverishment and overpopulation in all poor nations (or even only Catholic nations). Thus to trot as a counter-example that because other nations are poor but not Catholic that that proves the church can't be responsible for the ails of a particular Catholic nation is simply inane.

      In the Philippines, both the demographics and my personal experience living there suggests there is a connection between church policies on reproduction and economic destitution. There are other factors such as 100 years of US colonialism, natural resources (or lack thereof) and climate, but the Church deserves its equal share because those policies directly contradict the Church's own ethical frameworks, methods and values. And yes I was raised Catholic, went to Jesuit university, etc. etc.

  58. Hahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you think that if labor unions could be replaced or abolished, big business would've sat on it? Hell no! There'd be no labor unions if what you're saying is true. But it's not, probably because you live outside reality in your parents' basement, going to community college in between wanking sessions.

  59. Ah, the Imperial US raises its head again. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    any country has the right and the duty to attempt to avoid the circumvention of its employment laws

    Well yes, if the alleged circumvention happens in above hypotetical country.

    No if it happens elsewhere, like India, where it may not be illegal to discriminate based on age.

    The historical circumstances of each place are different, and your country does not have any rigth to make others conform to your own standards (which regarding worker protection are substantially lower to many other places, India included, where unions are very powerful).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Ah, the Imperial US raises its head again. by Pituritus+Ani · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As a country, this isn't an imposition of one country's labor laws on another--it's just an adjustment of tax codes to discourage commerce with countries who choose not to have standards equivalent to those of the importing country. Should that be a problem, the government of the exporting country has two choices: bring its labor standards up to facilitate commerce, or remain uncompetitive if it can't compete on a level playing field. This isn't coercion--there's no military force at work here.

      --

      Another proud carrier of the $rtbl flag

    2. Re:Ah, the Imperial US raises its head again. by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      The whole "level playing field" argument is such a joke; in reality, a level playing field is the last thing that protectionists want. Countries can and do set their own labor standards, according to the methods and preferences of their governments and people. For many nations, it doesn't make sense to mandate things which are assumed here in the U.S., like our level of minimum wage, or child labor prohibitions, etc.

      Adjusting import tariffs based on a value judgement of an exporting country's labor laws is a clumsy instrument of persuasion anyway. It harms domestic consumers just as much as the foreign exporter, and allows weak and inefficient domestic competitors to feed off the public trough, safe from the threat of poor, unenlightened wretches from outside our borders.

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  60. you might want to look up the definition before by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    ...you post:

    Neoliberalism is a political philosophy and movement beginning in the 1960s that de-emphasizes traditional liberal doctrines to achieve progress and social justice by more pragmatic methods, especially an emphasis on economic growth. Because of close association between this philosophy and neoclassical economics, and confusion with the overloaded term "liberal", the term neoclassical philosophy is advocated by some.

    Either term is primarily used by critics of neoliberalism rather than proponents, thus most discussion and description of neoliberalism is written from a critical point of view. Supporters of concepts found in neoliberalism, such as free trade and capitalism, view many of the descriptions of neoliberalism as straw man arguments.

    As described by Berkeley economic historian Bradford DeLong, neoliberalism has two main tenets:

    "The first is that close economic contact between the industrial core and the developing periphery is the best way to accelerate the transfer of technology which is the sine qua non for making poor economies rich (hence all barriers to international trade should be eliminated as fast as possible). The second is that governments in general lack the capacity to run large industrial and commercial enterprises. Hence, [except] for core missions of income distribution, public-good infrastructure, administration of justice, and a few others, governments should shrink and privatize)."

    Neoliberalism is often identified with a number of global organizations, including the World Trade Organization (WTO), the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The concept of neoliberalism arose as economists at the World Bank and IMF found that post-World War II development strategies for poor countries were not having the intended effects. In particular, funding for mega-projects left poor countries with high debts but little growth to show for it.

    The neoliberal doctrine is also a subset of the so-called "Washington consensus": a set of specific policy goals designed for Latin American countries to help them recover from the "lost decade" of the 1980s. This period not only saw a rise in dictatorships in the region, but also disastrous financial mismanagement resulting in rapidly rising prices for basic products, which inevitably caused an increase in poverty. In addition to the tenets of neoliberalism, the Washington consensus stipulated that a country should have stable exchange rates and a government budget in balance.

    Neoliberalism has drawn its share of critics due, in part, to some catastrophic failures. In particular, Nobel prize winner and former World Bank chief economist Joseph Stiglitz argues that the IMF is guilty of forcing neoliberal and Washington consensus policy goals on countries at times when it was not appropriate (i.e., the Asian Economic Crisis), with devastating results. Neoliberalism has also been criticised by the anti-capitalist movement, who argue that market forces inevitably increase inequality in wealth and hence power.

    While some use the terms neoliberal and libertarian or classical liberalism interchangeably there is a difference between the two philosophies. While both share a belief in market economics and free trade, neoliberal economics theory shares with neoliberal international relations theory (and liberal internationalism) a belief in international regimes and a degree of global governance as a means of negotiating and administering international agreements. Neoliberals believe that greater economic and political interdependence will lead to progress and a reduction of international tensions or at least divert states from utilizing military means to resolve conflict. Libertarians reject the neoliberal belief that global governance bodies or state negotiated treaty regimes that bind the individual are desirable.

    The term derives, not from the "Liberalism" of the modern period - that is Dewey, Woodrow Wilson and the

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  61. Re:Slightly off topic.... but along the same lines by asuffield · · Score: 1

    I'm 21, and the computers I grew up with, starting from the BBC Master, taught me how to build powerful software from the outset, rather than spending all my time working around the limitations of the hardware and the tools. I didn't have to be taught things like object-oriented design - it was obvious.

    When I went to university, I learned how all these things *worked*, all the way down to flip-flops, and to mathematical analysis of complex programs.

    I've seen people who've been working with computers for longer than me, but they seem to just miss the point. They spent years learning only how to work around computers, and when they went to university (if they went at all) they were taught nothing useful. They can find a solution to most problems they are faced with, but it's rarely the best one; they don't understand how to make computers work for them, instead of the other way around.

    Just when you thought it was safe, a different perspective comes up and kicks you in the nuts.

  62. Re:Slightly off topic.... but along the same lines by Satan's+Librarian · · Score: 1
    You kiddies these days, you think you're soooo special because you got the transistor! Back in my day, digital meant counting on your hands.

    Seriously though, I think having a solid understanding of how computers work at a hardware level is extremely useful in helping one understand 'the big picture'. But I don't really see how gaining that by hacking in assembler on a G4 or K7 processor is any different than gaining that hacking on a 6809 OR 8088, and I question the usefulness of having 'POKE 65495,0' stuck in my head as a way to double the speed of my computer.

    From what I've seen, it's the hands-on use and the love of the technology that makes a difference - not the age. Experience counts - I've definitely learned a lot over the decades (*sigh*) - but so much of what one learns is obsoleted by the next year that it's predominately the underlying truths that are useful. Stick a bright, interested kid with a passion for computers with a good mentor that makes them do complex real-world stuff, and I bet the kid would equal or often surpass most veterans within a few years.

    It's just too bad that in most universities that's not what happens - especially for the first four wasted years. I honestly think apprenticeships would work quite a bit better in IT and software development.

  63. What a load of tosh. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    IT people of all ages very often say the same urban legend.

    The truth is that at any age you find people that know little and people with loads of skill and talent.

    If people are not learning to program in assembly language an obscure microprocessor is because it is a skill no longer needed, computing has moved one or two abstraction levels and most profesionals do not need to trouble themseleves with such topics.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  64. Nonsense. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    The important thing is to understand the concept. your fingers, an abacus or a calculator are the right tool for the job depending on your social context.

    In a society where even mobile phones have calculators and where every single computer (an article obiquituous in most societies nowadays) pops up a calclculator with one or two clicks, the calculator seems like the obvious, necessary too to perform arithmetic.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Nonsense. by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Working with numbers is not always automatically 'arithemetic.' Some of the important skills in scientific/technical fields is how to balance proportions, do quick calculations in the head, etc.

      Since the demise of the slide-rule engineering has been on a 'raw numbers' binge. The ability to estimate and work things out without mechanical assistance is valuable.

      Sadly, in fields like EE and even Mechanical engineering these days, all people do is throw numbers around in computers to achive their designs.

      Where I am working on contract now, the techs spend half their day plugging numbers into Excel spreadsheets to hand up to the engineers, for the engineers to condense and hand up to management. It amounts to that much less 'hands on' with the real tech, and the quality of the work they get out of people is reduced.

      --
      resigned
  65. Age discrimination in US not always illegal either by winwar · · Score: 1

    Federal law prohibits age discrimination against those 40 and older in companies with 20 or more employees. Don't fit in those categories? Then age discrimination is legal, unless state law (or case law) says otherwise.
    Never forget that there are a lot of "exceptions" in federal laws. So while everyone states age discrimination is illegal in the US, the reality is a little more complex. Not to mention the fact that it is very difficult fact to prove if the employer has at least a few brain cells firing (gee, we didn't hire him/her because too qualified, not the right skills, didn't seem to fit in, not enough skills or the fact that most of the US is at will employment-you can quit or be fired without cause).

  66. Those are not US jobs. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Their are not stamped "For US citizens only".

    The wasteful way of life in the US society is contributing to it becoming less competitive (but not so much that you are too bad off. Stop whining, the US has it good, people normally have food and a roof on the top of their heads).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  67. Age discrimination by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 2, Insightful
    That's not the only reason! The bar I go to mainly employs young and very beautiful staff. This is because they want to attract customers who fancy the staff. Sheesh, just having all the ex-boyfriends of some of them come along is enough to make a profit :-)

    This strategy is less likely to work if all your staff look like Alice Cooper.

  68. time to support real Life extention research.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are 30 and over, if you want to work in the future, it's time to support real life extention research by supporting sites like www.methuselahmouse.org or
    www.betterhumans.com or
    www.biomedcentral.com or
    www.longevitymeme.org
    These sites are keeping track of all the new breakthroughs in bio-tech and nanotech that we can use in the next 5 to 10 to 15 to 20 years of breakthroughs that will extend life and make us younger for real.

  69. Flint, Michigan. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    QED.

  70. Your sig by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    Just as well I use metric then :-)

  71. Re:Hot grits, BSD style! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    was it only me, or was the first thing I saw:

    Hot grits, BSD style!

    Does signing on come with a free Natalie Portman inflatable doll?

  72. Alladeen, a play about outsourcing by RotJ · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The play looks at the issue from the Indian call center worker's perspective.

    NPR did a good story on it in December. If you don't like using ears, Fortune covered it too.

    Paying offshore workers much less than American workers would make for the same job isn't necessarily exploitation. The "low" salaries really depend on perspective. For example, a call center worker in India makes more money than a doctor does.

    1. Re:Alladeen, a play about outsourcing by d2k297 · · Score: 1

      "... a call center worker in India makes more money than a doctor does ..." I think you might want to read the comments on this page: Dark Side of Outsourcing

  73. Mod this up!! by SageMusings · · Score: 1

    This deserves a 5:Funny. Either that or I need to re-learn all I know about India.

    --
    -- Posted from my parent's basement
  74. That explains it by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    That explains it. All of the Indian employees from India that are arriving at my company for "replacment training" seem quite young. Yet the resident Indian employees seem to have a normal age distribution. I thought this was because my company got into the outsourcing fad late, and was only able to hire very recent college grads. Now I am starting to realize that over-30 is but another caste over there.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    1. Re:That explains it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. What happens is that when you are young and single, you dont mind putting your life on hold for extended periods by going to America. Later on when you are older and have a family and kids in school etc you dont want to go to another country.
      The general pattern here is that guys go to America for a year or two, and then come back and get married.

    2. Re:That explains it by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      No, you have it backwards. The Indian employees in my company who are resident have a normal age distribution. By "resident", I mean living here for more than three months. They may be legal residents, H1Bs, student interns, etc. I would guess an average age of 40.

      On the other hand, thopse who will go back to India a month after we've trained them how to do our job, are uniformly under the age of thirty. They're kids.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  75. Our Burden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Yes, it is certainly our White Man's Burden to export our more enlightened labour and environmental laws to the poor uncivilized Brown peoples.
    Any good Liberal would realize the moral worth of this obligation.

    Funny how old thoughts come back but from new sides of the political spectrum and with new catch phrases.

    1. Re:Our Burden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to point out the "sarcasm" tags got cleaned out of the Parent post. Should have previewed it.

  76. i hope Big blue gets reamed. by medelliadegray · · Score: 1

    my personal opinion is that if a corperation is based in the US, and shielded by US laws, US taxes, US interest, then that corperation must also abide by the US laws that include pollution regulation, descrimination etc.

    companies that have the majority of their labor based in other countries--they benifit no one except upper management and their top stockholders.

    I'm sure this opinion has some flaws.

    --
    Troll, Troll, go away and flame again some other day
  77. Re:Slightly off topic.... but along the same lines by scheme · · Score: 1
    We are the David Beckhams of the industry

    I guess everyone else doesn't have too worry about your group. David Beckham is an overhyped soccer player who is above average but not spectacular when compared to other superstar players. On real madrid, he's probably the 4 or 5th best player.

    --
    "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
  78. This isn't even basic econ by JimmytheGeek · · Score: 1

    which isn't much- econ is to real science what an mcse is to a real engineer.

    Corrected Example 3: Product costs $X to make, company charges $Y + 50 * (some fraction of 1 whose value is derived from the price elasticity: ie the degree to which demand for the product shifts according to changes in price. Small change in demand relative to price increase == bend over consumer)

    When there's a tax, the producer eats some of it, the consumer eats some. What proportion each eats depends on the elasticity. If the producer could charge the whole amount of the tax, they'd have charged it before the tax was imposed and just kept the profits.

  79. Speak English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should know how to speak English by age 28, but sadly, that's too late.

  80. Remember the concept of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    boycott?

    Shame and dishonor on companies with these policies. Don't buy their products and tell
    others you deal with not to buy their products and tell them why.

  81. that explains japanese porn by JimmytheGeek · · Score: 1

    The info on the models includes blood type. I always wondered if they were marketing to vampires as well.

    Weird.

    Oh, I just *heard* that the info on japanese porn models includes blood type. No direct personal experience, nosirree.

    1. Re:that explains japanese porn by Ill_Omen · · Score: 1

      also explains Japaneses video games. I've always wondered why Tekken, Final Fantasy, etc always listed "blood type" in the character descriptions.

  82. Both Ways by HyperCash · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I never understood age descrimination. I've always sort of assumed that even in fast changing fields like high tech that experience would be a good thing.

    If its because the older workers get paid more and won't work for less money then its a pay issue and not really an age discrimination issue. If you wan't the job that badly work for less; nobody owes you anything.

    And before you think its just so much easier for us youngsters...

    Age descrimination works both ways. I worked for a couple years in California at an orgization that would match 12% (Yes, 12) of your pay and put it in a 401K for you but they wouldn't do this for you if you were under 21. Thats age discrimination and apperently its perfectly legal.

    Oh...Yeah, did I mention how much more us youngsters have to pay for our car insurance even if we have a clean record?

    Or that the cost of college compared to the average income has skyrocketed making it much more expensive for us to get an education.

    Or that the cost of a house compared to the average income has also been steadily increasing making it more expensive to get a foot in the door and buy a house.

    Or that even with all of the above those of us starting out have to pay a higher percentage of our income in taxes making it harder for us to save up enough to put a down payment on a house.

    Or how we have to pay tons of money into social security (a much higher percentage than previous generations) even though its possible (probable?) that we'll never see any of that back.

    --
    So I'm jump'n up and down screaming show me the money.
    1. Re:Both Ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And as an "oldster" of 40, I have to ask you - do you realize all the complaints you have were the same complaints my generation had 20 years ago coming out of college? The cost of college in the 80s, cost of a house, cost of car, etc. all had "Skyrocked" since those lucky people in the 60s were getting jobs. And so on and so forth - some things just never change. Its all relative.

      Oh, and regarding higher insurance premiums - they are higher because younger people have more accidents, period. Its all based on statistical data, nothing personal or discriminatory about it.

    2. Re:Both Ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps we should raise your health insurance premiums as you get older, because *statistically* older people have a higher chance of being hospitalised and requiring medical assistance. there's nothing personal or discriminatory about it--so you say.

      Personally, you make me sick, condoning descrimination is just because you suffered through it does not make it right.

      My big pet peeve is Insurance--Male, female, it should not cost different for insurance until you prove you're a wreck--then increase their insurance costs--not before. I would condone higher insurance for certain types of cars as well. The adjusting insurance based on the color of the vehicle is wrong as well--imho--unless perhaps its a new vehicle--many used car owners just dont have the luxory of choice.

      Despite recent medical advances, the human mortality rate is still a staggering %100.

    3. Re:Both Ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modern insurance (of all types) is not really insurance anymore; it defeats the purpose of insurance. The idea is for everyone to put in roughly the same amount into a common pool, evening out the risks for everyone. So it shoudln't matter whether you are male, single, 18 driving a 2004 red Corvette, or a 42 year old husband, driving a grey 1995 Honda. The 18 year old would pay a bit more, because the asset he is insuring costs more, but that should be the only discriminatory criteria.

    4. Re:Both Ways by HyperCash · · Score: 1

      "The cost of college in the 80s, cost of a house, cost of car, etc. all had "Skyrocked" since those lucky people in the 60s were getting jobs."

      I didn't just say that they had gone up but that they had gone up as a percentage of income. We have to put a much higher percentage of our income towards buying a house and paying for school and paying taxes than earlier generations. This may have been true for your generation also.

      My main reason for the post was that I had read a bunch of previous posts that were sort of "woe is me, I'm old" which irritated me. I didn't intend it as whining, I'm doing ok and I intend to "make it" anyhow.

      But following what I said, the cost of a house, etc, being higher as a percentage of income it makes it hard to get started. Its not impossible, yet (Depending on where you live. The median home price in the county I live in (Marin, CA) is somewhere in the $600,000 range. I definetly won't be getting started here!), but it is I think getting harder.

      I sometimes wonder what kind of struggle any children I have will face. The more people there are the more scarce things such as land will become; the problem is only going to get worse.

      As to the higher insurance premiums, yes, I understand that they are based off of statistics but to say that they aren't disciminatory is wrong. Its a statistical fact that African-Americans are more likely to default on a loan than a Caucasian but banks can't charge them higher iterest rates because thats discriminatory.

      Discrimination is basing a decision on what somebody is (Black, Female, Young, etc) as opposed to who they are (Driver w/ a clean record, individual w/ perfect credit, etc.) You can argue that the discimination against young drivers is legal (it is) and fair (that is debateable) but not that it isn't discrimination.

      --HC

      --
      So I'm jump'n up and down screaming show me the money.
  83. consequence of regulation by vijayiyer · · Score: 1

    This is what regulations do - they drive business away to places which are more business friendly. Companies exist to make profit, not to employ old people.

    1. Re:consequence of regulation by edgedmurasame · · Score: 1

      And that will eventually drive people to boycotting you. It just wont work, no matter how well your morally bankrupt execs spin it.

      --
      "Forget the engineers." -Carly Fiorina, briber of MIT Technology Review.
  84. IEEE-USA and licensing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IEEE-USA is pushing for something that CAN help us. It is professional licensing. If we have that, we can push our state governments to mandate that only licensed professionals be hired.

  85. Finally a downside to outsourcing by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    Of course this has nothing to do with the unwritten policies that many IT Departments have of not hiring anyone above the age of 45, right? ;)

    I know of people above that age that are actually discriminated against in the IT field. Usually the employer makes up some excuse, like overqualified, to avoid hiring someone of this age. Then they turn around a hire a youngster fresh out of college aged 21 to 30. Since I passed 30, my job offers went down as well. The closer you are to retirement, the less likely they will want to hire you.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  86. What he's trying to say is that a "neutral" accent by dusanv · · Score: 1

    is still an accent be it midwestern, bbc or a brand new one not sounding like any of the current ones. You cannot speak without an accent.

  87. What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a waste. If you're going to discriminate, make it useful like for instance "Must be gorgeous nympho with large breasts".

    1. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Attn interviewers; please use the following applicant score form:
      • Knowledge of C/C++/Java, OOD, Unix/Linux/Windows, TCP/IP, enterprise development (weight 1)
      • Key role in successful delivery of multiple products and/or services (weight 0)
      • Degree from leading computer science program, pref. with honors (weight 1)
      • Problem-solving ability, communication skills, enthusiasm, passion for technology, ability to work as part of a team (weight 1)
      • Big tits (weight 5)
  88. Re:Mexicans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At the rate things are going, illegal Mexicans won't even need an H1-B. Once they can legally obtain drivers licenses, I'm sure they will turn up driving big trucks.

    "Stay off the freeway between 9 to 9:30; beer truck coming in."

  89. You sir, are a fool. by Elpacoloco · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You say that regulations "Drive businesses away," however, who said that nations need companies?

    A company is just a group of people who are trying to make the most amount of money possible. Regulations merely say "This is what it takes to earn money legally in this country."

    Therefore, for maximum profits, a company would need to function in the maxiumum number of countries, while following their regulations, and keeping production in the cheapest possible country.

    The nation does not owe the corporations that dwell within a profit.

  90. Spot On! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as the subject says.

  91. HR Requirements in Asia by bruthasj · · Score: 1

    You think Age is bad? If you can read Chinese, have a looksy at the job listings in the newspaper here.

    Requirements I've seen:

    * Woman
    * Man
    * Age range
    * Pretty
    * Weight restrictions
    * Skin color (tone, really)
    * etc.

    Not all in one job, but scattered between different areas.

  92. Call it what you want... by Gorimek · · Score: 1

    Whatever you call it, the fact remains that paid maternity leave does cost money for the employer, and this makes it more expensive to hire a woman than a man, all other things being equal.

    This, if enacted by law at least, makes women dependent on the good will and charitable nature of employers to get similar working conditions as men.

    With the planet's population increasing at it's fastest rate in history, it doesn't seem likely that one individual company's hiring policy will affect the survival of the species enough to make any specific hiring policy self defeating.

    1. Re:Call it what you want... by Jardine · · Score: 1

      Whatever you call it, the fact remains that paid maternity leave does cost money for the employer, and this makes it more expensive to hire a woman than a man, all other things being equal.

      Depends on where you live. In Canada, employers do not pay employees on maternity leave. They do receive money from the federal government for the time they have off up to a maximum (17 weeks I believe). After that time is up, they and the father can take Parental leave. If the mother took Maternity leave, then she can take up to 35 weeks of Parental leave on top of the 17 weeks. The father can take up to 37 weeks of Parental leave. So in theory, the parents can take a total of 89 weeks. 17 Maternity, 35 Parental (mother), 37 Parental (father).

  93. And here's the rest by achurch · · Score: 1

    (quoting with corrections)

    [Step] 1: Company hires local experts, fairly high regulations yadda yadda. Product cost $X to make. Company charges $Y for product.

    [Step] 2: Company decides to cut costs to become "more competitive." They outsource entire operation to a less regulated/expensive part of the world. Product cost $X - 50 to make. Company charges $Y for product.

    [Step] 3: Government gets pissed off that Company is avoiding local income taxes etc and tax company out the wazoo for their offshore operations. Product again costs $X to make. Company charges [$Y + 50] for product.

    Step 4: Other Company starts making product. Product still costs $X to make. Other Company charges $Y for product.

    Step 5: Company (the first one) goes out of business.

  94. As an Indian good to see this topic by PaneerParantha · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As an Indian I am happy to see this topic being discussed.

    When I worked in India 10 years ago, it was common to see such ads. Some companies also asked for your marital status, the number of kids you have, and your driver's license number. There was no option but to provide this information.

    Some pressure on them to discontinue such practices would be good.

    1. Re:As an Indian good to see this topic by gabbarbhai · · Score: 2, Funny

      Um.. What about the last name? I am sure it plays a major role too..

  95. Human Commodity by bigattichouse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When you have so *much* talent to draw from, from a pool of a billion, it must become very easy to just treat them like a commodity... to use them for what they're worth and then toss them aside when you're done with them... sort of the "low wage" syndrome (like call centers) here in the states - they work for nothing and there are a 100 people who will replace them - in fact there are 5 people being trained right now for when you get sick of it and quit, do you honestly give a crap about them as a manager? no. Humans are notoriously bad at managing surplus. Scarcity, we do pretty good with.. we even invent whole bodies of knowledge to manage it (economics).. Surplus? We have no idea what to do with it, and so we waste it. Now, I'm not exactly happy about offshoring, but I feel that, from the world-level-view, this sort of behavior is counter productive.

    --
    meh
    1. Re:Human Commodity by sodhi1981 · · Score: 1

      Though the population of India is 1 billion, only a miniscule percentage of it is educated ,and of this miniscule group only a miniscule percentage is what I would call educated to western levels.

    2. Re:Human Commodity by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

      But, as I discovered working in IT at the aforementioned call center... they would treat their salary employees the same way the treated the call center personnel... when a human has no value to you, the only humans with value are those in the "elite" (in this case management)

      --
      meh
  96. Disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A central tenet of the trades unions movement (well this is true in the UK anyway) is solidarity. I think this is what the poster was referring to and it is part of the "basics" of trades unions.

    An example of this was a textiles factory in the 1970s. The workers went out on strike. In the end bosses had to capitulate because they didn't get any supplies or even mail, because of solidarity shown by other workds. The miners even took days off work to show up outside and man the picket.

  97. Re:Please help! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leave him.

  98. IBM and Age Discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posting anonymously for obvious reasons. IBM has one of the best diversity programs period. Hell, they have a Gay/Lesbian/Bisexual/Transgender executive council (Yes, that's a Transgender executive council).

    This age discrimination lawsuit it really dumb. Basically, IBM changed the retirement plan. In the end, this benefited everyone, but some people are claiming that because it uses age to determine benefits, it's discrimantory. This is just another frivilous lawsuit.

  99. Palmisano is more than 27 years old! by watermodem · · Score: 3, Funny

    Palmisano is more than 27 years old!
    Lay him off! See how he likes it.
    Just make sure that the medical insurance costs more than the parachute.

    1. Re:Palmisano is more than 27 years old! by narsiman · · Score: 1

      But he supports Linux.

      There he is back into everybody's good books again.

  100. Fuck you, racist. by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Somebody with the class and educational background to get this sort of job in India speaks English well enough. Your problem is not that the foreign workers speak bad English, but rather that you're intolerant of anybody who speaks it with a foreign accent, and undisposed to listen to them in the first place. (Of course you're not going to understand what somebody says if you don't listen to them.)

    1. Re:Fuck you, racist. by ObitMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can understand an Austrailian who speaks English with (to my ears) and accent. Same with people from GB (except some scots i know)
      I understand Asians (japanese, korean, singnapore) who are just learning english with little problem.
      But many people from the middle east and india I cannot understand unless they slow their speach down considerably.
      But At 2 am with the servers in a datacenter roaring in my ears, I don't want to talk to them. the conversation is like 2 old deaf people talking to each other: "What" "Repeat that" "slow down"

      Annoying as hell.

      --
      Who run Barter Town?
    2. Re:Fuck you, racist. by WCMI92 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Somebody with the class and educational background to get this sort of job in India speaks English well enough. Your problem is not that the foreign workers speak bad English, but rather that you're intolerant of anybody who speaks it with a foreign accent, and undisposed to listen to them in the first place. (Of course you're not going to understand what somebody says if you don't listen to them.)"

      Foreign accents, I don't mind. I work with Iranians at my workplace.

      But I can't understand half the words Indians use. Which makes it TWICE as hard when you are trying to fix a server.

      If Microsoft, Cisco, etc are going to charge me an arm and a leg per incident, they should provide someone who speaks English I can understand.

      It's not racist, it's a fact. If I can't understand you, you are no use to me.

      --
      Corporatism != Free Market
    3. Re:Fuck you, racist. by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      "Well enough". Heh. *That's* why so many people complain of incomprehensible gibberish on tech lines, because they speak "well enough".

    4. Re:Fuck you, racist. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      meri lund choos, madderchod.

      if u can't understand the indian accent then you're stupid. chinese/hong kong accent is the worst to understand, because their languages are not part of the Indo-European language set.

      madderchod

    5. Re:Fuck you, racist. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What people should do is request an American Tech Support rep, at Bellsouth DSL when someone gets a support agent from overseas the customer has the right to ask for english speaking support agent.

    6. Re:Fuck you, racist. by Hognoxious · · Score: 0
      if u can't understand the indian accent then you're stupid. chinese/hong kong accent is the worst to understand, because their languages are not part of the Indo-European language set.
      While that linguistic factoid is true, I fail to see see how that's got anything to do with how hard they are to understand. A strong French, Portuguese or even Geordie accent is pretty hard to understand; OTOH Japanese isn't Indo-European but I don't find them that much of a struggle to understand. Unless they're speaking Japanese, of course.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  101. Well. THAT makes sense. by solios · · Score: 1

    I always wondered why Japanese video games made such a big damned deal out the characters blood types. Doubly curious becausee blood typing as it applies to science and biochemistry has NEVER FEATURED IN A SINGLE GAME I'VE PLAYED.

    This sheds some light on it. O_o

    Talk about discrimination! O.O

  102. This information could cost IBM in sales, BIG time by micron · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have worked in a few IBM shops over the years at Fortune 100 companies.

    They all had some sort of "vendor ethics" policy that stated that vendors (ie: such as IBM) had to have similar policies. These would include items such as harassment, ethical standards, EPA standards, age discrimination, etc. Mainly due to the contracting companies own liability.

    Any contractor of IBM's that we would haven been exposed to would have to have the same standards.

    Many large companies have these policies. There also seems to exist camps in these same companies that always want to throw IBM out for one reason or another.

    This, IBM does business with contractors that engage in age discrimination, is exactly the sort of canon fodder that these people pray for. It does not matter if India allows this to happen, large US companies don't want to deal with this stuff.

  103. Maybe this link will help you... by PaulBu · · Score: 1

    Here.

    I'm not a pure libertarian, I do accept the neccesary evil of government.

    Actually any modern libertarian (as opposed to "pure anarchist") would completely agree with what you said here. The "necessary evil" with a mandate to use force against people, thus better limited to using the force (i.e., military, police and courts) and NOT distracted by doing "nice" things (like, everything else liberals would want it to do).

    Paul B.

    1. Re:Maybe this link will help you... by mc6809e · · Score: 1

      The "necessary evil" with a mandate to use force against people, thus better limited to using the force (i.e., military, police and courts) and NOT distracted by doing "nice" things (like, everything else liberals would want it to do).

      Right.

      "Hey, we love doing nice things for people. Now give us your money so we can pay for our special programs, or we'll throw you in jail."

      "Help us spead peace and love or we'll kick your ass!"

  104. 21-25 year olds are a minority group by spaceturtle · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    21-25 year olds are a minority group, so this is called 'affirmative action', which means its discrimination, but it's good discrimination. Nothing to see here folks, move along...

  105. Malaysia has strong RACIAL discrimnation hiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you would see in many malaysian job ads, "bumiputras only need apply" or "bumiputras strongly encouraged to apply". 'bumiputra' means malay muslim. strng discrimination there, not noticed by the outside world?

  106. Gattaca by relativePositioning · · Score: 1

    -zipping up his trousers-

    When is the interview?

    That was the interview, your hired.

    --

    "I'm a loner Dottie, a rebel."
    - Pee Wee Herman
  107. Re:Slightly off topic.... but along the same lines by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
    Us oldies grew up with EDSAC, ENIAC, and remember valves (tubes to Americans). We remember subroutines and microprogramming being INVENTED, and I personally knew the people that invented them. The fact that we were there when all the inventions occurred, (eg memory management, RISC, bytes, variable word length, etc) gives an insight the youth of today will never have.

    We have also seen untold numbers of progects get stuffed, and remember why it happened.

    However, it does not give us a job with companies who think hours_at_work==productive_hours, and we still need to earn a living.

    As to all these young people in call centres, do you want your company's image to be one that appearance matters more than substance? If the call centre staff can't grasp the issue, they do not provide a service to the caller, they are just an irritant. Rember the Malibu advert where the guy is slapped round the face with a wet fish? Would a slap round the face with a wet fish make you buy MY products? [if yes, please e-mail Michael Dell, he needs your business.]

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  108. Re:India experience at our s&p 500 software co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who the fuck has 250+ software products?

    MS
    Symantec
    CA
    OS Vendor - UNIX or otherwise
    SAP
    Oracle

    I got nothin' else...

    Please enlighten us so we can boycott when possible.

  109. Wow! by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

    I'll turn 25 shortly. You know, it'd be extremely nice if within an year, I'd be officially too old to be a tech support person. Because every time I'm asked to do some technically challenging thing (like install something...) by a friend or relative, I get a serious headache.

    "Could you get this thing working?" "Sorry dad, I'm too old to do tech support, I can only do it if the doctor says it's okay."
    "Could you get this working?" "Why sure, little sister, if you let the me, the senile install guy, play a little bit of that OSX chess. You know, back when I was a kid, the Macintoshes all looked like bird nesting boxes, and these computer chess boards were really black-and-white (Blah blah blah...)"

  110. no, it's lack of experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Intellectually, I feel I have pretty much been an adult since around the age of 10 or 12 (I am 42 now, a veritable geezer by slashdot standards). However, I certainly did not have the life experience I have now, nor does any other teen. I don't think people's brains acquire any more "processing power" beyond fairly early childhood, but practical experience is everything when it comes to making solid decisions or getting a job done. Outside of athletics, a forty year-old does almost everything better than a twenty year-old, not due to any inherent difference in ability, but due to twenty years of practice.

  111. broken English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called American English.

  112. we-don't-need-no-stinking-unions Amazon." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey!! We don't need any stinking-unions because this
    country is stinking enough otherwise too ;-)
    Just travel a bit around and see!

    BTW, this place is plagued with all kinds of sh*t, so no unions can save this place!

    Just off topic, but, IEEE-USA "union" in US did a nice job for the Americans - securing jobs. And indians are learning the results slowly - if at all.

  113. China will be next by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

    China is a communist state slavery country, the cheapest labor there is....

    Their government could care less if some company killed a few thousand people, they'd probably like that.

    Most of them learn English in school... Sure, you won't be able to understand them, but I can't understand the Indians we have to deal with now.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
  114. Age discrimination - Why? by losttoy · · Score: 1

    I think the age discrimination is in place at Daksh because the management believes that the younger employees are not responsible enough to handle customers and business.
    Most younger (16-21) employees, typically, are studying and take up working in call centres just to add some more rupees to their pocket money. They don't care a damn about the customer or the business they are supposed to be answering calls for.
    The result, as I found out, is that customer care people are indifferent to customers' rants. Even the threat of withdrawing business from the company doesn't seem to ring a bell in their brains.
    I guess older employees are supposed to be more responsible as working at a call centre is their primary source of income and they wouldn't want to be fired.
    Btw, India has firm minimum wage laws in place. And as far as I know, call centre employees are paid well above the minimum wage level.

    1. Re:Age discrimination - Why? by pclminion · · Score: 1
      I think the age discrimination is in place at Daksh because the management believes that the younger employees are not responsible enough to handle customers and business.

      You didn't even read the fucking submission copy on the front page! You suck!

      They are discriminating against people older than a certain age. Over 27 years old? Don't even bother applying. The complete opposite of your sub-millisecond assumption.

      Slashdot: Taking RTFA To New Heights.

  115. many of us in phone support beg to differ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we are hanging on by our fingernails. At my company, some lower level phone support has gone to Nova Scotia and the UK. You definately want to stay hands-on no matter what. If your job can be done over the phone, you are toast.

  116. Re:... you, racist. by joshmccormack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I could probably deal with accents a lot better if two things would happen:

    1. Slow down. The performance metric that says that the faster you handle a call is done without consideration for the customer

    2. Stop that infernal beeping. I don't know what that is - something telling me they're recording the conversation or something, but when a conversation has every fourth word bleeped out it's hard to understand, especially if they're asking important questions I may have to pay for.

    Josh

  117. Re:Slightly off topic.... but along the same lines by baalz · · Score: 1

    This is just silly logic. Most coders of ANY age aren't good hackers. Just because the toys you learned to hack on had less bits than the ones I did doesn't make you a king with a deeper innate understanding of technology. Giving a kid a degree doesn't make them a hacker, but learning in a different environment than you did doesn't mean the younger hackers didn't learn the same lessons. Make no mistake about it, the younger you is out there, and he was taking apart his own toys at 10, they were just different than the ones you grew up with. You can turn out better code today because of your experience, but it's pretty assinine to think anyone who had different toys than you will never catch up.

  118. Interesting, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He might be the only person on the entire staff with that "skill". And unless you met with him in person, "he" might have been three different people.

  119. Teamsters and Trucking by Tackhead · · Score: 1
    > Get the Teamsters involved! Think about it: If IT workers were Teamsters, and there was a contract disagreement between IT and management, then NOTHING would get shipped ANYWHERE by truck. That would really be an issue for most large corporations.

    Yep, it sure would. Oh, it's funny you should mention the Teamsters and the trucking industry this morning:

    USF Corporation to Close Red Star Operating Company

    CHICAGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 23, 2004--USF Corporation (NASDAQ:USFC - News) announced that it is shutting down its USF Red Star operating company effective immediately. The Company concluded on Sunday that the unexpected and unilateral job action initiated on Friday by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters had triggered a loss of customers and revenue to a point where Red Star would never be able to recover from the business losses caused by this Teamster job action.

    > Don't rely on professional organizations like the IEEE and ACM to help you with your career. These are international organizations, and don't give a rat's ass about IT in the USA.

    Don't rely on a bunch of political hacks like the Teamsters to help you with your career. They're a bunch of ignorant thugs, and don't give a rat's ass about your job -- only their ability to extract union dues from you to prop up their political power.

    1. Re:Teamsters and Trucking by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      USF Corporation to Close Red Star Operating Company

      It's a company press release. They're going to blame anyone they can, and the Teamsters were the scapegoat in this case, because of their "job action". This company was dying due to mismanagement, and failing their customers and their employees. Blaming the Teamsters was an easy way out.

      Don't rely on a bunch of political hacks like the Teamsters to help you with your career. They're a bunch of ignorant thugs, and don't give a rat's ass about your job

      If I were you, I would be careful about saying things like this in a public forum. You don't want to offend anyone you might have to rely on later.

      -- only their ability to extract union dues from you to prop up their political power.

      The union dues go to support an organization which lobbys for ME, as opposed to IEEE dues, which help support a standards organization and their agenda. That's the difference. Professional organizations are no longer for the professional. They have their own agendas that don't include members. Don't believe me? Look at the latest ACM ballot, and read what each candidate had to say. They don't give a rat's ass about the members, as long as they buy magazines.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  120. software corps in s&p 500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks to Fidelity funds spartan market index annual report, here are the software companies in the s&p 500

    Software
    -----
    Adobe Systems, Inc.
    Autodesk, Inc.
    BMC Software, Inc.
    Citrix Systems, Inc.
    Computer Associates International, Inc.
    Compuware Corp.
    Electronic Arts, Inc.
    Intuit, Inc.
    Mercury Interactive Corp.
    Microsoft Corp.
    Novell, Inc.
    Oracle Corp.
    Parametric Technology Corp.
    PeopleSoft, Inc.
    Siebel Systems, Inc.
    Symantec Corp.
    VERITAS Software Corp.

  121. Terrorist in Training by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With all the "voice" training, it sounds to me that they are just terrorist in training.

  122. Age Discrimination by Stormcrow309 · · Score: 1

    You can have the project manager that is fresh out of school. I will take the 50+ year old who flew attack helicopters for the army and was a divisional training officer, with 10+ years IT experiance, an MBA, and having ran his own successful business.

    Let's see who's project will fail first. I can train techical know-how.

    --

    In God we trust, all others require data.

  123. Time to use your head for more than a ball cap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your comments assume allot. You have completely ruled out any type of new union, and made generalizations about worst case scenarios. Laziness which in my opinion is humanities biggest obstacle cannot be prevented by unions. The fact that many unions have standardized practices for doing some tasks is often times because somebody lost their life trying to cut a corner or take a shortcut that management encouraged. If you took a look at the differences in the quality of life and work safety between union and non union employees, I dont think you would be stating such lazy opinions as fact, especially when you consider that approx. 99% of the worlds population is an employee and not an employer.

  124. Please read ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes typically there is an ill effect when people join together to protect each other, especially when they are as ignorant as you. Now on the other hand when smart capable and experienced employees join together to protect each others rights, safety and quality of life they typically succeed at that goal. What you are worrying about is more than likely a worst case scenarios.(ie. not a typical experience) You cant condemn the whole thing because of a few bad eggs, if you could all of humanity would be screwed.

  125. Agg-zends by jonskerr · · Score: 1

    I was running a used book sale in college when an indian student asked me if we had any "Debs. gah-zed debs?" We went around a minute before I realized he was saying 'cassette tapes.' The biggest difficulty in my mind of listening to the Hindustani accent is the tendency to voice all consonants instead of making them merely aspirant.

    --
    O~ Him that studies revenge keeps his own wounds green. -- Francis Bacon