Or GNU interested geeks. I also think that a lot of people in the general public don't want to know about a kernel and especially the license it is under.
It is interesting that my parent thread got a -1 even though it was one of the first threads and was replied to by the author of the story. And the reply to my post just said that the person agreed with me but somehow it got moderated with +5.
First I would consult a lawyer, but If i were you and I wrote the code, I would definately release it as open source. There isnt a company anymore to sue you for Intellectual property violation!
While I probably wouldn't want to be friends with this guy, I have to say that he wasnt breaking the law in any way. I got the implication that he didn't author the content, but linked to it just as google links to content. You don't see google employees being carted away to jail, do you? Anti-government sites should be counted as free speech just as burning a flag should be. Unlike cross burning which implies a threatened violence to certain people, an antigovernment site is antiestablishment not anti individual.
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?d=c&c=sco&k=c1&t=5d&s=r hat&a=v&p=s&l=on&z=m&q=l
It looks like Redhat's Stock has gotten higher than sco's in the last five days but both stocks now seem to be increasing and decreasing in a similar ratio.
Or GNU interested geeks. I also think that a lot of people in the general public don't want to know about a kernel and especially the license it is under.
It is interesting that my parent thread got a -1 even though it was one of the first threads and was replied to by the author of the story. And the reply to my post just said that the person agreed with me but somehow it got moderated with +5.
First I would consult a lawyer, but If i were you and I wrote the code, I would definately release it as open source. There isnt a company anymore to sue you for Intellectual property violation!
While I probably wouldn't want to be friends with this guy, I have to say that he wasnt breaking the law in any way. I got the implication that he didn't author the content, but linked to it just as google links to content. You don't see google employees being carted away to jail, do you? Anti-government sites should be counted as free speech just as burning a flag should be. Unlike cross burning which implies a threatened violence to certain people, an antigovernment site is antiestablishment not anti individual.
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?d=c&c=sco&k=c1&t=5d&s=r hat&a=v&p=s&l=on&z=m&q=l
It looks like Redhat's Stock has gotten higher than sco's in the last five days but both stocks now seem to be increasing and decreasing in a similar ratio.
Doesnt WINE use the windows API?
This http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/ archive/2003/08/04/financial0031EDT0009.DTL
article explains the issue in more detail.