Slashdot Mirror


Who Owns Source Code When a Company Folds?

pipeb0mb asks: "A few years ago, I worked for Chilliware, Inc. as the 'Technical Development Manager'. Some of you may remember us for the software iceSculptor, Mohawk and Mentor. Chilliware folded rather quickly and harshly back in May of 2001 due to money issues. Within days of the first layoff, everyone was gone, from the CEO and VP's to the receptionist. Now, years later, I've been digging through some old CDs, and am reminded that I still have the final production source code for the products we released in the retail channel. I've attempted to contact several folks over the past couple of years to gather information about the software and who owns it now. To no avail though. Either I get an 'I don't know' or 'No one' from the dis-interested parties. I feel like these programs are my children that never got a fair shot. I hate to see so much work wasted and lost to the ages. So, Slashdot: What do I do with this source code? It's a great deal of well commented and well written code, performed by over 100 developers in a former Soviet Republic (who formerly worked with Boomerang Software). Where do my binary children go now?" As things are now, if a company folds, the code is buried and forgotten unless someone buys the rights to it, before the source code is lost. This issue was discussed a long time ago and there didn't seem to be much in the way of answers. Have 3 years made any difference?

490 comments

  1. Lawyers by aridhol · · Score: 5, Informative
    Do you know who was the corporate counsel for the company? If so, have your lawyer contact them. If not, your lawyer may be able to discover who it was. Also, your lawyer may already know the answer, or be able to get in touch with someone who does.

    In short, contact a lawyer

    --
    I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
    1. Re:Lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "This code belongs to SCO!"
      -- the SCO Minster of FUD

    2. Re:Lawyers by Luigi30 · · Score: 1, Funny

      "There is no code!" -- the Iraqi Minister of Information

      --
      503 Sig Unavailable

      The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
    3. Re:Lawyers by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Make sure you have a copy of your contract to show your lawyer. Might be wiggle room there. Not likely, but maybe their lawyer did a lousy job of writing it, and you retain control over some of the stuff.

    4. Re:Lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you "found" someone his property and you don't know who the owner is so bring it to your local police station.

      Go for the 10% finders fee, and if nobody comes and claims it, it's YOURS !

    5. Re:Lawyers by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      Your state probably required the company to be registered. Look up that public information (it might even be on one of the State's web sites). There will be a contact name and/or address, although it might not have been updated. That might be their law firm, who should know who decided what happened to the assets.

      ..and if all the assets went to a single creditor, that company probably owns the rights now.

      This kind of thing you can try to do yourself, but you'll probably want a lawyer's assistance when you actually complete a deal. Take notes and collect all the information which you find, so you can present your lawyer with what you found. The lawyer might do some other searching, but you may as well provide your info in case that reduces his effort (and expenses).

    6. Re:Lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you "found" someone his property and you don't know who the owner is, bring it to your local police station.

      Go for the 10% finders fee, and if nobody comes and claims it, it's YOURS !

    7. Re:Lawyers by TekPolitik · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do you know who was the corporate counsel for the company? If so, have your lawyer contact them.

      This is not correct. First, the liquidator is the one that would have done anything that need to be done. That's your first port of call.

      If the liquidator didn't sell it, then what happened to the property depends on what country (and state, in some cases) the company was incorporated in. Typically the undistributed property of a delisted company vests in the securities regulator or government for the company's incorporation jurisdiction.

      Even if the liquidator didn't sell the IP, they should be able to tell you who gets it by default. There shouldn't be a need for a lawyer, and let's face it, who wants to give money to a land shark if it's something you can do yourself.

      Thus there is almost certainly an owner somewhere - you need to contact them and see if you can buy the rights, which you will probably be able to do if they're held by a regulator who has no other use for them (especially if you have the only copy of the code that could be used to make use of them).

    8. Re:Lawyers by TekPolitik · · Score: 1

      Correction: s/delisted/deregistered/g

    9. Re:Lawyers by mortonda · · Score: 1
      In short, contact a lawyer


      Especially since you mentioned that you are from an ex Soviet nation. What would a bunch of American /.'rs know?

    10. Re:Lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All your base are belong to SCO!

    11. Re:Lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget who was the corporate counsel, ask Scott Mcnealy.

      I alomst can't believe I have read a few dozen messages and nobody seems to have any sense of history . . . well, almost!

      http://www.crn.com/components/search/Article.asp ?A rticleID=15162

    12. Re:Lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The code war is over." -- George W. Bush

    13. Re:Lawyers by Atticu5 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I can't believe that no one has posted this yet (I don't think)... In soviet russia, the code owns you!

  2. The correct answer is, of course... by Walter+Wart · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... "ask a lawyer".

    But failing that, try to find the principals of the company, the original owners. They owned the assets of the firm. If they don't want it try to get a "whatever, do what you want with it" from them before you try to sell or publish it.

    --
    The man who never alters his opinion is like the stagnant water and breeds Reptiles of the Mind -- William Blake
    1. Re:The correct answer is, of course... by lannocc · · Score: 1

      Make sure that's a written "whatever, do what you want with it". Probably should be witnessed too. And notorized?

    2. Re:The correct answer is, of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      But failing that, try to find the principals of the company, the original owners. They owned the assets of the firm. If they don't want it try to get a "whatever, do what you want with it" from them before you try to sell or publish it.

      NO, NO, NO!

      Folks, please pay attention to the thread on this. If it was this easy, there would not be a problem. There are three possibilities:

      The original owners almost certainly do not own the code anymore when a company closes the doors but does not go through a formal bankruptcy to distribute assets. The code, as well as all other assets, are owned by the creditors (most likely, especially in a venture-funded company, but even this can vary dependent on how original agreements were drafted). Even if there is no longer any board of directors, as long as the corporate entity itself exists the assets will probably be owned by the creditors in this situation. However, there will usually still be at least a chairman of the board, so you could contact that person to see if a deal can be cut with the creditors to open-source it, etc.

      If the corporate entity no longer exists, because it was shut down through a bankruptcy, then this issue was taken care of through that process, and the bankruptcy lawyers will know what to do (somebody else already owns the code, most likely).

      If the corporate entity no longer exists, and there was no formal dispersal of the assets (i.e., through a bankruptcy), then things are stickier. This would be the time to hire a lawyer to go back and figure out what reality is. Different states have different laws about "abandoned property", and in many states these laws apply equally to corporations and individuals alike. If this is the situation, and you can find out what the time limit is for property to be considered abandoned, your best option might just be to wait quietly until that time limit has passed.

      No, I am not a lawyer, and the above is not legal advice. I'm just an ex-CEO who suffered through a business partner killing a company we co-founded, and I had to try to keep the legal pieces together...

    3. Re:The correct answer is, of course... by fred1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The general legal answer is that if the assets were not dealt with either privately (e.g., assignment to a creditor in satisfaction, or claimed by a creditor as part of a secured transaction), or publicly (e.g, bankruptcy, assignment for the benefit of creditors), it passed to the stockholders of the company, subject to the claims of creditors, i.e., actually owned by the stockholders but always open to some legal proceeding by a real creditor. From there, who knows; e.g., there might be a difference depending on whether it was a public or a private company. Suffice it to say that no one on this list working with the information at hand can give any advice that you would want to stake your life on.

      --
      Gary Dolan Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r1, Kernel 2.5.10 FreeBSD 4.8 OpenBSD 3.3
  3. You don't by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would imagine SCO have already registered a Copyright and will be contacting you shortly to save you from unwittingly using someone elses intellectual property. Either that or the creditors.

    1. Re:You don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely, SCO will contact you first, and then register the Copyright a couple of weeks before they go to trial.

  4. Were their assets bought? by Stone316 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Most likely i'd say their assets were bought by someone, if the software was any good that is. I'm sure there are alot of companies out there keeping their eye's open for bargins.

    Check old news releases from competitors, etc.

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    1. Re:Were their assets bought? by TheViffer · · Score: 2, Funny

      their assets were bought by someone, if the software was any good that is.

      And if not, the code just goes into public domain.

      Cool! Looks like we all are going to have a copy of SCO source code in a year!

      --
      -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
    2. Re:Were their assets bought? by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      TheViffer said, "Cool! Looks like we all are going to have a copy of SCO source code in a year!"

      Oh, GOD, I hope not... It's dirty, I don't want any part of it. I bet it smells like wet rat.

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  5. Like with BeOS by zephc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Be folded, and I guess sold its IP to Palm, but sold the source code to the yellowTAB guys, which was absolutely the right move. Palm is sitting on their hands (pardon the pun) about using any Be IP, but the yTAB guys are hard at work on the next version of BeOS, now called Zeta. Check it out.

    --
    "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
  6. Who owns the code? by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Funny

    I do.

    I will license it to you for 699 dollars.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Who owns the code? by nother_nix_hacker · · Score: 1

      And then I'll counter sue because I have a function called main() in some of my software too meaning it's my IP.

    2. Re:Who owns the code? by gritz · · Score: 0

      it's only 199 for desktop right now ;)

  7. Did someone... by BJZQ8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did someone purchase the assets of the company? If so obviously they own it...if it was a fire-sale type of thing and nothing really changed hands, I don't see how a non-existant owner could sue you for making it public-domain or even using it yourself.

  8. How to find out who owns the code. by pclinger · · Score: 5, Funny

    Post it online, wait to get sued.

    --
    /. editors made it impossible to link to file:///c:/con/con in my sig. Please just type it in
    1. Re:How to find out who owns the code. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Better yet:
      Post it online in co-workers name, wait until co-worker get sued.

    2. Re:How to find out who owns the code. by kmac06 · · Score: 1

      Hahahaha

      One of the funniest things I've heard on /. for a long time

    3. Re:How to find out who owns the code. by TheViffer · · Score: 1

      One of the funniest things I've heard on /. for a long time

      And WTF do you consider a long time?

      3 hours?

      SCO say's show me the money

      --
      -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
    4. Re:How to find out who owns the code. by isorox · · Score: 1

      Post it to slashdot, usenet, and anywhere else as anonymous coward from an internet cafe in Burma, then see what happens.

    5. Re:How to find out who owns the code. by Gherald · · Score: 1

      GPL it

    6. Re:How to find out who owns the code. by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
      SCO say's show me the money

      No. SCO says "THROW me the money."
      (preferrably small, unmarked bills in a brown paper bag).

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    7. Re:How to find out who owns the code. by ciryon · · Score: 1
      Post it online, wait to get sued.

      By who?

      Ciryon

    8. Re:How to find out who owns the code. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      isn't it myanmar now?

  9. It has to be said ... by Greedo · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's a great deal of well commented and well written code, performed by over 100 developers in a former Soviet Republic ...

    Well, we all know that in Soviet Russia, source code owns YOU. So maybe you should ask IT.

    --
    Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
  10. In my experience... by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 4, Informative

    IANAL

    That really depends on the definition of "folds". Some examples from my
    experience...

    1. Company simply stops operating.

    In that case the company itself may still exist (in fact if you go to
    the web site of the Secretary of State for your state you may be able
    to determine if the company is still "active" in which case someone's
    filing simple forms on the company each year). In that case the
    company (and by extension the shareholders) own the code.

    In this case you might find that the owners, who probably have little
    interest in the company, and acquire the rights for a small fee.

    2. Company is bought outright by another company

    This one's pretty simple, the new company probably bought all the
    assets of the old company and that would include the copyright on the
    source code.

    3. Company's assets a bought but company remains alive

    This can happen when a company gets into serious trouble, as happened
    with many boom companies, and is effectively worth nothing because
    there are no customers. The remaining assets (e.g. physical stuff
    and copyrights) sometimes get acquired by another company for a small
    fee. This happened to me, and in that case the new company acquired
    the assets and got the source code.

    4. Company goes bankrupt

    If the company owes money to people then all its assets are going to
    get valued, and that will include the source code, and who gets them
    will probably be in the hands of a court. In this instance see what
    happened in the bankruptcy clean up.

    In the case of venture backed companies there might be specific
    clauses in the investment that state what happens if the company goes
    under and the VCs may end up with the code.

    John.

    1. Re:In my experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      IINAL, but I've been through this as well, and am currently attempting to acquire some source code in a similar state.

      Since I was a founder of a company that went under, usually what happens if the company just "goes bankrupt" is that they do NOT go "bankrupt," as that implies that it's seeking legal protection from its creditors. Rather, it undergoes a voluntary liquidation.

      During a liquidation, all "assets" are divided up amongst the shareholders of the corporation in some way that seems fair to the shareholders based on their share classes. In our case, the Series B investors (who had preferred stock) chose to give a kick-back to the Series A investors (who had preferred stock, but not as preferred as Series B), out of good will, though they had no obligation to do so. However, and this is a kicker, this only works with fungible assets (such as stuff that can be sold).

      If the source code was not sold before liquidation, meaning that it is not a fungible asset, then what happens is that rights to the IP get divided up amonst the shareholders of the corporation in a way appropriate with the corporate governance of the liquidation. In other words, if Series B investors got 80% of the loot, and Series A investors got 20% of the loot, then the exact same proportion happens with the rights to the source code.

      So in order to get it, you essentially have to find everybody that has a proportional right to the source code if it's not been seized by someone in the liquidation, and convince them to give over their rights to it. This usually means finding every shareholder in the corporation, and figuring out who owns their stock. It's going to be really rough.

    2. Re:In my experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the question: "It's a great deal of well commented and well written code, performed by over 100 developers in a former Soviet Republic"

      From your response: "go to the web site of the Secretary of State for your state"

      Somebody didn't read the question very carefully...

    3. Re:In my experience... by MrLint · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Something kinda similar happened with an after dark module. Berkley systems went *foom*, i guess some of the stuff got bought by Sierra/EA. However there was a lot of questions surrounding a game module called 'lunatic fringe' by Ben Haller. There used to be some info about it on his page, something along the lines of that there won't be an update as no one knows who owns the copyright anymore.

    4. Re:In my experience... by tadheckaman · · Score: 1

      I am THE pro at lunatic fringe, I still have it on one of these old syquests around here...

      --
      My potato gun was confiscated by the United Nations. They said I wasn't allowed to have weapons of mash destruction.
    5. Re:In my experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANYL,GYOGDL

      That really depends on the definition of "folds". ...
      1. Company simply stops operating.
      2. Company is bought outright by another company
      3. Company's assets a bought but company remains alive
      4. Company goes bankrupt


      The short answer is: some one still owns it. But you knew that part. You're trying to find them.

      If the "company" was a corporation, it had shareholders. If the company was a partnership, it had partners. Other kinds of companies usually have combinations of these things. All companies have creditors. When a company gets "wound up" for one reason or another, those in charge divide up or sell off the worthwhile assets. At the end, some one almost always gets "all other rights and assets". So, the copyright to this code could have been divided up, or some one could have thrown money into the pot and taken the copyright in exchange, or it might have gone to whomever received "all other rights and assets".

      You've got to find that person. The defunct company's president, board members, etc. probably know who it is. If not, the defunct company's lawyer probably knows who it is too. You may be able to find his name from the few basic corporate documents kept at the Secretary of State's office in the state where the company was incorporated -- it'll be quicker if you can get his name through other channels you may have. The lawyer may have copies of papers showing the transfer of the copyright. He might, maybe, agree to tell you who now holds the copyright, or agree to tell the copyright holder that you're interested.

      Having your own lawyer will help. Maybe you'll get lucky and the person who now holds the copyright will sell it to you or open source it. Probably, they'll want something for it. Good luck.

    6. Re:In my experience... by dramaley · · Score: 1

      >IINAL

      I is not a lawyer?

      --
      ----- "I'm still sane on three planets and two moons."
  11. Could'nt resist by kp833 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    performed by over 100 developers in a former Soviet Republic
    In soviet russia.... software owns YOU!

  12. Reverted To Author? by wo1verin3 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The author of a Mac game called Glider worked for a company called Casady & Greene. He seems to believe that since the company went bankrupt, the rights have reverted back to him as the author.

    I guess this would hold true so long as they didn't sell or assign the rights elsewhere.

    Even then, regardless of the answer, you can still be taken to court and it will be up to a judge.

    1. Re:Reverted To Author? by cshark · · Score: 1

      In this case (I am not a lawyer, don't take anything I say seriously), it looks like this glider game is public domain.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    2. Re:Reverted To Author? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, if a company goes bankrupt, the bankruptcy court divides all assets (including source code) among the creditors.

    3. Re:Reverted To Author? by cymen · · Score: 1

      The Windows version he has on the page works on Windows XP (shh... I'm at work).

    4. Re:Reverted To Author? by Walker · · Score: 4, Informative

      That is not an adequate example. C&G closed their doors before going bankrupt (they intentionally avoided bankruptcy). That allowed them to actively return the rights of all their software to the authors. Which they did.

      This is not a general precedent. C&G were just nice guys to the end.

    5. Re:Reverted To Author? by cshotton · · Score: 1

      Casady and Greene was simply a publisher. The rights to all the software they sold was (obviously) retained by the authors of their respective apps. C&G didn't develop the software they sold.

      --

      Shut up and eat your vegetables!!!
    6. Re:Reverted To Author? by Migraineman · · Score: 1

      I'm currently working on a contract job for a start-up (yes, there are still start-ups.) In the contract, we specifically stated that if the company goes out of business for whatever reason, ownership of the software and hardware designs we've done will revert back to us. We consider this fair because we're accepting a percentage of the future profits as compensation for our efforts.

      It would be difficult to create a similar contractual agreement if you're a full-time employee. You've accepted compensation in the form of a paycheck. If they ask you to build Widget X, your employer may flush it down the toilet if he so wishes. You have no ownership rights because you traded them for the regular pay.

    7. Re:Reverted To Author? by DansnBear · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you read the page currently posted here, the reason that Glider Pro (and practically all the rest of the software they sold) went back to the author was that Casady & Greene were merely software distributors. When C&G the folded, the software was no longer under contract, and the rights reverted back to the author.

      --

      -= Who are The Headlocks? =-
    8. Re:Reverted To Author? by jordandeamattson · · Score: 1

      Very few (if any) of the products from Casady & Greene were owned by C & G. C & G was a publisher and only had publishing rights. The copyrights were in general held by the respective authors.

      In the case of Glider, the author was not an employee of C & G, but rather used them as a publisher. I don't know his contract, but if it was like the one I had for my book, it states that if the publisher ceases to publish the work in question, that the publication rights revert back to me (as the copyright holder) and I can do with it as a will.

    9. Re:Reverted To Author? by aziraphale · · Score: 1

      That contract may be null and void in the event of bankruptcy. If the company goes out of business, having paid you already for some or all of the work done, then that clause would give you preferential status over creditors in divvying up the company's assets. Bankruptcy law trumps contract law, I'm afraid.

  13. Who owns the source code? by oZZoZZ · · Score: 4, Funny

    Flip a coin

    heads = SCO
    tails = Microsoft

    1. Re:Who owns the source code? by Nick+Fury · · Score: 0

      What if it lands on its side? Does RMS own the code in this rare event? Or wait, is it even possible for him to own code? I swear I read somewhere in the GPL that he couldn't own code.

    2. Re:Who owns the source code? by wastaz · · Score: 1

      you forgot

      Lands on it's edge = Profit!

    3. Re:Who owns the source code? by gentoo_moo · · Score: 1

      Two-headed coin anyone?

    4. Re:Who owns the source code? by spamchang · · Score: 1

      edge = SCO vs Microsoft in court. author still loses. welcome to the civil side of the "justice" system.

    5. Re:Who owns the source code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't SCO be the tails? ;)

    6. Re:Who owns the source code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our coins don't have tails you insensitive clod!

  14. Find the liquidator by daceaser · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'd advise that you find out who was in charge of the liquidation of the company, and approach them. They would be in charge of the assets. See if they were sold on. If the liquidator still has possesion of them, offer a modest sum ($100 or something) to buy the rights to it off them. The liquidator will probably just pocket the money anyway.

    If someone bought the rights when the company was liquidated, see if the liquidator will tell you who, and approach them.

    --
    -- There are three kinds of mathematicians: those who can add and those who can't.
  15. school by zumbojo · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Where do my binary children go now?"

    Either Binary District Elementary or Binary Memorial High School.

    1. Re:school by stilesja · · Score: 1

      Sounds more like they are ready for Binary, FL. Source code retirement community just outside Boca Raton.

  16. IANAL comments under here please by PseudoThink · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Oh man, any possibly useful answers to this interesting question are going to get buried by all the IANAL geeks willing to impart their pseudo-wisdom.

    So how about this...if you ain't a lawyer or don't have accurate experience with the legal aspects of this sort of situation, post your IANAL comments under this thread!

    1. Re:IANAL comments under here please by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 1

      I am a lawyer, but that won't stop giving misleading and ambiguous advice, I get paid well for it.

    2. Re:IANAL comments under here please by ONOIML8 · · Score: 1

      I love it!!!

      Besides, I don't understand why people here are so afraid to give legal advice. Look at the situation, look at the people. Slashdot is made up of a bunch of geeks, people who are a bit brighter than your average ex-college football player. These are the people who aquire, store, sort, process and transport information using electrons and photons.

      Lawyers are ex-football jock types who know diddly squat yet managed to graduate.

      And the Slashdot crowd is afraid to give legal advice?

      What, are you afraid the big jock will give you a wedgie again?

      --
      . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
    3. Re:IANAL comments under here please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I am still the little geek and the big jock is the judge ;-)

  17. You will need to check the BK court records by alen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When a company goes BK, the creditors own everything and either divide the spoils or it gets liquidated at auction. Most likely someone bought the rights to the software for pennies on the dollar. You will need to check the records at the federal or state BK court where the action was filed. Since there may be service fees involved to search online, you may have to visit the court and search yourself.

    1. Re:You will need to check the BK court records by kelnos · · Score: 3, Funny
      When a company goes BK...
      all i can think of while reading this: "when a company goes to burger king..."
      --
      Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
    2. Re:You will need to check the BK court records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck does BK mean? "When a company goes Burger King?"

      Seriously, how is BK even slightly an abbreviation of bankrupt?

    3. Re:You will need to check the BK court records by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you like fries with that?

  18. I would release it by mandrakeroot · · Score: 0

    First I would consult a lawyer, but If i were you and I wrote the code, I would definately release it as open source. There isnt a company anymore to sue you for Intellectual property violation!

    1. Re:I would release it by pipeb0mb · · Score: 2, Informative

      This was my inital thought. I wouldn't consider selling it; it would be open source, as many of us felt it should have been in the first place.

      Frankly, I'm in between jobs right now, and can't afford a lawyer for something like this, but am more than willing to make a few more phone calls and dig about for records.

    2. Re:I would release it by Arker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, do that. Search the records, see if it was auctioned off, if anyone bought it, what exactly happened to the company in a legal sense. Bankruptcy? If so then you need to read through the bankruptcy judgement. If you're smart and keep it low profile you can probably acquire the rights real cheap.

      Of course posting to slashdot might not be the best start on keeping a low profile.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    3. Re:I would release it by beee · · Score: 1

      Between jobs because you got caught using your company's resources for pirated material. You deserve no sympathy.

      --


      + Donald Gunth
      + Email: dgunth@quicktek.net
      "Caffeine is the greatest lubricant ever created." -ESR
    4. Re:I would release it by mandrakeroot · · Score: 0

      It is interesting that my parent thread got a -1 even though it was one of the first threads and was replied to by the author of the story. And the reply to my post just said that the person agreed with me but somehow it got moderated with +5.

  19. Retain an IP lawyer? by Bravo_Two_Zero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not suggesting this is cost-effective, but maybe it would pay to consult with an intellectual property lawyer? It's a cop-out answer, I know. But assets are normally liquidated from dead companies by the last holder of the company. Maybe it's a trivial venture to purchase the rights (via a foundation, new or existing) to the now-deceased company from the former owners? Someone has to still be holding the bag... even a VC.

    --


    Amateurs discuss tactics. Professionals discuss logistics.

  20. The question is... by TopShelf · · Score: 1
    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  21. BeOS sourcecode and Yellowtab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    They didn't sell their code to YellowTab.

    YT has a license to use the code until 2005 or something (and that doesn't seem to include the kernel as they havn't announced any of the bugfixes the BeOS community has been longing for).

    1. Re:BeOS sourcecode and Yellowtab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah, okay. That would also explain why I recall seeing somewhere on their site about wanting to replace all the internals with parts from OpenBEOS over the course of development.

  22. Who do you think? by ihummel · · Score: 1

    Who owns the code when a company folds? Why SCO of course! Don't they own everything?

  23. You could release it as Open Source by !Squalus · · Score: 1

    If you owned it and no one is after it, check with liquidators first, then release it as GPL. People might like it them. How was it licensed anyway? Seems Chilliware made some Apache confgurator thingie too - but I don't remember much about that either. They came and went way too fast.

    --
    All Ad hominem replies happily ignored as the sender shall be deemed to lack the faculties to comprehend the equation.
    1. Re:You could release it as Open Source by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 1

      That's Chilisoft. They made software that enabled you to run .asps (etc..) on apache

      --
      ymmv
    2. Re:You could release it as Open Source by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      This is how a SCO gets created, only this version would be an outright winner...

      Only the rightful holder of a copyright can choose to subject their IP to the GPL. If somebody falsely claims that they own the rights and are attaching the GPL to the IP, and it goes anywhere useful, the original owner of the copyright can come out of the woodwork can claim that it wasn't really licensed under the GPL and they'd like $695 for every processor its ever been used on now.

  24. Whoever bought the (dead) company's assets. by Dawn+Keyhotie · · Score: 1
    IANAL, but whoever bought up the assets during the bankruptcy process now owns the source code, even if they don't have it in their possession. If YOU turned up with the source code, you would be compelled to turn it over, assuming that the new owner was keeping watch on the market.

    However, it the company tanked so badly that there WAS no bankruptcy / asset sell-off, then you may be in the clear.

    The best thing to do would be to hire an actual attorney in your jurisdiction and go from there.

    Of course, you could just start marketing the products as your own and see what happens. But then you would always be waiting for that certified letter in the mail hauling you into court to seize all of your assets. Hmmm... which way to go? ;^)

    Cheers!

    --
    "The only good windmill is a tilted windmill."
  25. ask the owners by UnderAttack · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, if a company seizes to exist, either due to bancrupcy, or it is just disolved, all assets are usually sold off. The source code was likely part of this. Now it may happen, that nobody bought it, and it got abandonded for anyone to pick up. But to make sure, you need to check with whoever took care of the company.

    --
    ---- join dshield.org Distributed Intrusion Detec
    1. Re:ask the owners by CormacJ · · Score: 1

      Find out who the liquidators were, and offer them a price for the source code. Usually the creditors are happy enough to get any money at all, and an agreement can be reached.

      On the other hand, if the creditors think that the source code is something that they want or can sell for a large profit then it will be harder for you to reach an agreement without costing you a lot of money.

      If the source has already been sold them you will have to contact the current owner.

    2. Re:ask the owners by Vainglorious+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      a company seizes to exist

      You're thinking of another company that siezes to exist. Chilliware has merely ceased to exist.

      --
      My next sig will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush
    3. Re:ask the owners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if a company seizes to exist, either due to bancrupcy, or it is just disolved, all assets are usually sold off. The source code was likely part of this. Now it may happen, that nobody bought it, and it got abandonded for anyone to pick up. But to make sure, you need to check with whoever took care of the company.

      OMG Learn to freaking spell! Then STFU and go sit in the corner you fucking newbie.

  26. Not you by Malc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Although you worked on it, you never owned the copyright. What makes you think you'd own it now, or that there isn't somebody out there with a legitimate claim to it? Use it at your own risk.

    1. Re:Not you by perrin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Although you worked on it, you never owned the copyright. What makes you think you'd own it now, or that there isn't somebody out there with a legitimate claim to it? Use it at your own risk.
      That varies from country to country. While the general concepts of copyright are agreed upon in international conventions and agreements, the national implementations have significant differences. Always consult a lawyer from the country in question.
    2. Re:Not you by Antitorgo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Technically, I think it depends on the work agreements and so forth...

      If I work on a contract basis for a company, I technically own the Copyright until handing it over to the company buying my "product".

      There are all sorts of legal issues though. For example, if I am a contractor, but working on a company provided computer, and they don't pay me... they *might* own the code I wrote because it was on *their* computer.

      So on and so on... it is always best to consult a lawyer when it comes to issues like this though.

    3. Re:Not you by antirename · · Score: 1

      My contract states that I own the IP. I cannot sell or license it to a competitor, that's all.

  27. Difficult call by The+Bungi · · Score: 5, Informative
    Well, the issue here is the copyright. If the copyright is owned by a corporation that no longer exists, then there's nobody to enforce it. You can't slap another license on top of it. If you release the code to the public domain (because I assume that you can't legally claim the copyright) and make absolutely no money, there's a good chance that nobody will give a rat's ass if your attempts at contacting the former officers of the former company are any indication. If you sell it or claim copyright on it, there's a damn good chance that you'll start to see the previous owners coming out of the woodwork to sue your geek butt - and this of course is also a possibility even if you don't make a dime off the code as someone will probably contest your release to the public domain because it wasn't yours to give away in the first place. People tend to be weird that way.

    My advice? There's no way you can just release this without getting an OK (a legal OK) from whomever owns the copyright (this may be the company that auctioned the corp's assets for all you know). If you're the only known holder of this code, you're out of luck. You already posted to /. =) Otherwise you could have just released it to the wild without a peep using Kazaa or Freenet or something like that. Not ideal of course, but it would be better than having it sit on a CD for the next 20 years or whatever the IP laws dictate, and it would have been nearly impossible to trace it back to you, I think.

    Tough situation, for sure.

    1. Re:Difficult call by werdna · · Score: 1

      Well, the issue here is the copyright.

      False! Copyright may or may not be the issues. Copyright is the issue, unless the issues is trade secres, trade dress or design protection for the user inteface or patents or contracts or any of a kazillion issues underlying the work. Heck, if names or images appear on the work, there may even be right to publicity issues. The corporation might not actually own the IP, or may not control it. You simply cannot know from the facts recited whether "the issue is copyright."

      If the copyright is owned by a corporation that no longer exists, then there's nobody to enforce it.

      False! The personal property of a corporation that is liquidated is divided among its investors, depending on the articles and agreements of the individuals and/or state law. The copyrights will be distributed in accordance with those agreements, and with it -- the right to enforce.

      If you release the code to the public domain (because I assume that you can't legally claim the copyright)

      Only the owner of the copyright can dedicate it to the public domain.

    2. Re:Difficult call by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      You sir are a shining example of selective reading *and* selective quoting. Mad propz.

      Next time, read the entire post. It helps.

    3. Re:Difficult call by bigpat · · Score: 1

      "You already posted to /. =) Otherwise you could have just released it to the wild without a peep using Kazaa or Freenet or something like that."

      Oh I'm sure that it would be easy to figure out who "pipeb0mb" is and then find him in Russia.

  28. With OSS this ain't a problem by Vexalith · · Score: 1

    Another advantage of GPL and similar licenses is that if a company gets [bored|bought|bankrupt] some other group can continue development. This is why we don't have a lot to worry about with Novell's Ximian aquisition. Even if they decide to stop development of XD2, Mono, Evolution etc, I'm sure some other people or company might want to continue doing so. Obviously this doesn't help much in your case, but it's worth thinking about for people developing new software.

    1. Re:With OSS this ain't a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get the hell off of your soap box. We all like OSS... you're preaching to the choir.

    2. Re:With OSS this ain't a problem by belroth · · Score: 1

      Someone else can continue by forking the last GPLed version. If Novell now own the copyright on the code they can release only closed versions if they wish. They may GPL further developments if they want, but don't have to.
      I have no knowledge as to the actual ownership of the copyright, but if it was Ximians, it's now Novell's.

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
    3. Re:With OSS this ain't a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, now go fuck off.

  29. It depends by twenex · · Score: 1

    If the company shut down in an orderly fashion, the owners/investors of the company own the assets.

    If the company shuts down through bankruptcy or other processes such as an ABC where they have not been able to pay their creditors, the creditors own part or all of the assets. Most likely the assets were sold off if they had any value in this case.

    That's your first task: find out how they shut down or if they are a going concern. If they shut down in an orderly fashion, they may still exist within the company shell.

    So, I'd use the following technique:
    1. Search for the company records in your state or local govs website to see who the owner is, or if it is shut down. Contact the owner.
    2. If you believe it shut down owing creditors, contact a creditor (or two) to see if they know. They may have records since they may have had to approve any disposition of assets

    I think it is really unlikely that "no one" owns the assets.

  30. Not to mention the fact that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HE FUCKING FAILED IT!

  31. Who Owns Source Code When a Company Folds? by Petronius · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Wait to see what happens to SCO and you'll know the answer.

    --
    there's no place like ~
    1. Re:Who Owns Source Code When a Company Folds? by JollyFinn · · Score: 1

      Uhh I don't think that the rule becomes that IBM gets the code for company that folds.

      --
      Emacs is good operating system, but it has one flaw: Its text editor could be better.
  32. $10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll give you $10 for the rights to your soul, Heh Heh!

  33. Depends on how the company folded by msgmonkey · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Disclaimer, this could be totally wrong but AFAIK:

    If a company goes bankrupt then the liquidators that are called in would basically sell off all the companies assests in order to pay back anyone the company owes money too.

    If the company went into volantary liquidation and there are no outstanding debts then anything left over is split between the shareholders. It depends if the code was actually accounted for as an asset whilst the company was being liquidated. If it was n't and you go on to make money off this code then you could end up being sued.

    1. Re:Depends on how the company folded by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 1

      If the company went into volantary liquidation and there are no outstanding debts then anything left over is split between the shareholders. It depends if the code was actually accounted for as an asset whilst the company was being liquidated. If it was n't and you go on to make money off this code then you could end up being sued.

      If the source code was counted as an asset when the company was liquidated, then what you have is a CD that is a copy of source code now owned by whoever bought the code at the liquidation.

      --

      Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
  34. Well written AND well commented? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What do I do with this source code? It's a great deal of well commented and well written code

    Well written AND well commented? Put it in a museum, dude!

    1. Re:Well written AND well commented? by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1

      Or Ripley's Believe It or Not.

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    2. Re:Well written AND well commented? by _Upsilon_ · · Score: 1

      He didn't say it was both... some of it is probably well written, the rest well commented.

      Everyone knows you can't have both. :)

  35. Just been through this... by Skjellifetti · · Score: 2, Informative

    in Ohio (answers may vary by state?). Company went into Chapter 11. Code to an enterprise workflow system was sold by the bancruptcy atty to the founder for $1,000. You need to get hold of the atty who is handling the bancruptcy and make them an offer.

    Code is an interesting case when assets are sold. Normally, a physical object can only be sold once. But rights to code could potentially be sold many times. Selling it many times may diminsh the value to each buyer. If you wish to Open Source the code, this might exacerbate the value decline if there are other interested buyers so you will have to be careful about exactly what rights you will have. As always, consult an atty.

    1. Re:Just been through this... by arkanes · · Score: 1

      I don't see how you could sell ownership of the code more than once. The owner can license it to third parties (interesting question: if the company you license, say, a library from goes bankrupt, does your license go poof when ownership is sold to someone else?). By definition, copyright is an exclusive right.

  36. It Belongs To SCO by DoctorMabuse · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You owe $5.00 for every day you've had those CDs.

  37. creditors and dead code by siskbc · · Score: 5, Informative
    Do you know who was the corporate counsel for the company? If so, have your lawyer contact them. If not, your lawyer may be able to discover who it was. Also, your lawyer may already know the answer, or be able to get in touch with someone who does.

    You are of course correct. Again, asking /. for legal advice isn't sound advice. However, I'll tell you what would happen, basically. If you tell that lawyer you have something from this company of value, it should technically belong to the company's creditors - I assume it went out of business for a reason, correct?

    What will likely happen is that the lawyers for that company won't be interested in developing the software - but they'll be damned if they'll just give it to you and see you do something with it of value. Likely, they'll tell you to fork over the code and decide to archive it in case anyone wants to screw with it. No one likely will.

    There are basically three options you have. The first two certainly involve getting a lawyer.

    1. Buy it from them. Problem there is that they will not know how to attach a value on it, so they will pick an arbitrarily high one. Remember, if no deal is struck, they get it back once you admit to having it. They also don't want to get fired when they sell it to you for too little. Not reaching a deal won't get them fired, and burning the code is probably best for them.

    2. License it from them. Give them some money up front and a cut of whatever you get. This will cut your upfront costs, but they will likely want a huge cut. However, they won't be as afraid, at least, since they get more money if you do. Nobody looks too bad.

    3. Pretend you don't have it, and do a "dirty room" re-write of it. Effectively plagiarize it and assume that anyone else involved with it won't remember, won't notice, etc. Then, if you do anything of value with it, worst case scenario is they sue you, you settle, everyone's happy. Bet you wish you hadn't posted this now, huh?

    The problem is that, as the article poster mentions, this is a software dead-end, and it's very hard to revive dead code. The current owners don't want to look like idiots when they get pennies for valuable code that they didn't correctly value. They'd rather bury it, which is your problem now.

    Note that this is not to be construed as actual legal advice. You'd have to be an idiot to listen to me, particularly since option 3) is pretty illegal. ;)

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:creditors and dead code by micromoog · · Score: 4, Funny
      • 4. Just go ahead and give the code to SCO, since they own it anyway and have all along.
    2. Re:creditors and dead code by Ingolfke · · Score: 5, Funny

      Then, if you do anything of value with it, worst case scenario is they sue you, you settle, everyone's happy.

      Please tell me you've never done any Linux development for IBM.

    3. Re:creditors and dead code by siskbc · · Score: 1
      Please tell me you've never done any Linux development for IBM

      ;) No. But then, he doesn't have IBM's pockets either. Less of a target.

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    4. Re:creditors and dead code by O_Chaos · · Score: 0

      Exactly, this sound like the best idea, then the could sell it at 5 maybe 600 a pop :)

      --
      Into MMORPG's? Check it out!
    5. Re:creditors and dead code by Ogerman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are basically three options you have.

      How about:

      4. Convince them to assign the rights collectively to the old development team, under an open license. This way, both the old developers and the general public will benefit. That's what any respectable company would do.. (of course, ideally, said company would not have produced proprietary code to begin with and this wouldn't have been an issue)

    6. Re:creditors and dead code by booch · · Score: 2
      burning the code is probably best for them
      It would be good for you too, since then they would have little proof that you've stolen their code.

      I'm a little curious about the "value" of the code though. You could make an argument that it's not worth anything, except as a base for adding to. I mean, this was a software company -- the creditors really can't claim that they didn't know the company owned the copyrights to its software.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    7. Re:creditors and dead code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      the company probably had a receiver setup, who liquidated all the assets at fair market value and returned the cash to the creditors.
      Contact them. Ask to have a fair market value assigned to the intellectual property, if it was not done so, and you may license it from them @ that price. They will use an external company to do this valuation.
      Typically the IP with no programmers left is not worth very much. You may be able to buy it outright for very little money.

      Certainly you do not own it, you probably signed employee agreement stating you wouldn't have this code around home anyway :)

    8. Re:creditors and dead code by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      But there's a big question mark as to just who the "them" to buy it from is... or even if there still is one. If the company went bankrupt, then you can contact the bankruptcy court to get the records and chase the lines there. However, if they simply wound down and closed up shop, it's not so easy.

      However, if people who should know what happened are saying "no one", get that answer in writing. Nobody owning a copyright on IP means that there's nobody left to sue you if you start using it... in two words: "public domain". :) If the people telling you that are in fact the owners, then they're too clueless to sue you anyway.

    9. Re:creditors and dead code by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Remember, if no deal is struck, they get it back once you admit to having it."

      Not necessarily. As long as he doesn't publish the code somehow, his may well be the only existing copy. It's actually a bargaining point. They either deal with him fairly, or they get zilch. All he must do is "lose" the disks. Remember, his copy is legal under fair use (backup copies made while employed) and the only thing the owners can do is compel him to destroy it. They can't compel him to give the code back - he doesn't have a relationship with them anymore.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    10. Re:creditors and dead code by jonsmirl · · Score: 5, Informative

      5. Convinvce them to donate it to the FSF. FSF can work with them to set a reasonable valuation. This valuation then becomes a tax shelter to the current owners. FSF releases the code GPL.

      Getting a tax shelter is probably worth more that trying to get $$$ from out of work developers.

      Valuation could be based on what it cost to create the code. $1M in valuation could be worth $300K real cash as a tax shelter.

      One of the reasons Microsoft pays almost zero corporate income tax is because of all of those software donations to schools at full retail. Copy CD for $1, donate to school as $800 MS Office license. $800 x 40% corporate tax bracket equals $320 in taxes saved. $320 is really created by this transaction, without it the $320 would have to be sent to the government. MS does hundreds of millions of dollar worth of these donations each year. It also has the added plus of brain washing everyone to use their software.

    11. Re:creditors and dead code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      1. Buy it from them. Problem there is that they will not know how to attach a value on it, so they will pick an arbitrarily high one. Remember, if no deal is struck, they get it back once you admit to having it. They also don't want to get fired when they sell it to you for too little. Not reaching a deal won't get them fired, and burning the code is probably best for them.

      I used to work for a UK company that was liquidated. Basically the receivers were legally obligated to get as much money for the creditors as they could, so not selling the code when somebody is willing to pay for it is not an option. Everything of value was sold to the highest bidder. In the case of the source code there were two interested parties - a customer (who had acquired a couple of the dead company's developers) with a vested interest in a particular piece of software and a company formed by some of the employees who planned to take the code and build on it. The two parties bidded against each other until one gave in.

    12. Re:creditors and dead code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For all the backroom trading that goes on with option three... I'm afraid that that is how dead code for the most part lives on past the end of a company.

      Having seen things like the colapse of the dot-com companys and the fall of some other big company's from something big to something very very small the only way that abandoned projects worked was when you just take it and run off with it.

      NOTE: This only works if the code is really dead and they are not activly trying to sell it.

      The funny thing is.... that many of the players from the old company from the VP down 'knows' deep down that you took the code... but for the most part none of the lawyers or VPs even have a copy of the old stuff so have no way of even compairing it. (Some of your co-workers 'might' have it but they an't really admit to it can that? Anyway, just quietly hire them if they do.)

      So you do a little UI work... some changing... put your own brand on it... make sure to really look it over for info that might have anything to do with your old company... compile... and no one can really prove a thing. 99% chance whatever holding company that might have any say in it wouldn't know you existed and if they did wouldn't bother going after you. Wots the point?

      Possesion is 90% of the law.

    13. Re:creditors and dead code by Unordained · · Score: 1

      wow ... i'm guessing the RIAA / MPAA aren't about to do that? seems like it might help that revenue problem they have ... the entities they give their stuff to don't even have to want it, or use it. hmmm...

    14. Re:creditors and dead code by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I've seen software sell for as little as $1. That might not sound like fair-market value to some, but it's not uncommon for a lot of things. Not sure software. Cars, land, computers, etc. have sold for $1 before.

      Things are hairy if the company still owes creditors. But by this time the creditors have gotten all that they expected. Often the corperation's name can be sold for $1 and creditors are satified with that.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    15. Re:creditors and dead code by meaux · · Score: 1

      This is a fantastic idea. Does anyone know if the FSF is actively soliciting or promoting this means of adding more intellectual property to OSS?

    16. Re:creditors and dead code by ryusen · · Score: 1

      this sort of makes sense, ANAL, but you coudl possibly argue that it's not worth anything, since in it's current state did nto produce a sellable product. from there you could buy the code from them for a % of any profit you did make on your revision of it... just more random thinking

      --

      I believe sex is highly over rated... unless it involves me
    17. Re:creditors and dead code by Decimal+Dave · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's really crazy. Microsoft getting a tax write-off for donating something that costs them essentially nothing to manufacture, but has a high market value.

      What's to stop me from doing that for my personal income tax? I could write some stupid shareware app and attach a retail value of $100. Then, burn a few thousand CDs and donate them to a local non-profit. Yay, no income tax!

      --

      "Leave the strategizing to those of us with planet-sized brains." -Tycho
    18. Re:creditors and dead code by jonsmirl · · Score: 1

      You have a problem with valuation. If you only gave away the software and never actually had customers buying it at $100, the IRS would say that it is not really worth $100. Same problem if you sold one copy at $100 and gave away 1,000.

      But if you buy a Picasso for $4M and donate it, the IRS is fine with that. People also try to buy the painting for $4M and donate it at $6M. Sometimes they get away with it.

      It is up to the FSF lawyers to help set a proper valuation on the donated code. The number is somewhere between zero and the cost of it's development. I doubt if the IRS would argue if you picked 50% of it's development cost.

      Microsoft sells many more copies than they donate so you can't argue valuation. Since it is given away in small amounts to many places, they can also support retail pricing.

    19. Re:creditors and dead code by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Yes. But how much MS software is actually sold at list price?

      That's a trick question, because MS has contracts with companies that forbid them to disclose how much they paid for the software. But we *know* it's a lot less than list.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    20. Re:creditors and dead code by jonsmirl · · Score: 1

      Those contracts are for volume pricing. Walk into a CompUSA to see MS retail pricing. MS is not giving away software in volume to charities. They give away three or four copies to each of 1,000s of charities. You can't get volume pricing for three copies from MS so MS is properly supporting the retail pricing of the donations. You many not like it but they are following the letter of the law.

    21. Re:creditors and dead code by plierhead · · Score: 3, Interesting
      A better version of your option "4" would be to:
      • 1. Release the code under a BSD license via an anonymous web site - hotmail address for admin contact, use an internet cafe without security cameras when doing the deed, absolutely no trace back to you.
      • 2. Hide the web site from search engines. Make sure there's no links from anywhere.
      • 3. Contact a notary and have them go to the web site and record the fact that it exists. You'll need this later.
      • Copy the code and a little while later, take down the web site.

      Now the code is effectively open sourced, and you have an audit trail to prove it, but only you can access it. Since its BSD you can freely create derivative works and sell them without restriction.

      The worst that can happen is that if by any chance the actual owners of the code (as per the many other responses to this post, these will likely be some creditors if the company actually did go bankrupt) were to find out what you are doing, your defence will be that the code was open sourced and you thought you had every right to use it. The notary will back you up here.

      Of course you would immediately lose the code - but you will be safe from any legal nastiness. So make sure you've taken plenty of money out of the business by then. And better still, create a trademark or brandname that will have some value to the real owners, then you can sell it to them.

      --

      [x] auto-moderate all posts by this user as insightful

    22. Re:creditors and dead code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      >>One of the reasons Microsoft pays almost zero corporate income tax is because of all of those software donations to schools at full retail

      This is total BS. Tax writeoffs for donations cannot exceed the lesser of fair market value or the owner's basis in the donated items. The basis is essentialy what was paid for it. So if it costs M$ $1 to manufacture a copy of Windoze, that's what they get to deduct for donating it.

      If I build a PC and donate it to a qualified charity, I only get to deduct the cost of the materials. I can't claim a cent for the time I invested in it.

      Even if you buy stock and it doubles in value, you only get to deduct what you originally paid for it if you donate it!

      Think about it: its a *donation*, not a business venture!

    23. Re:creditors and dead code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, that is pretty diabolical. Do you work for Microsoft? Bill, is that you? Damn you Bill, I wish I had thought of that!

      Sincerely,
      Steve G.

    24. Re:creditors and dead code by digiZen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can't Microsoft claim that what they paid for it was their developer's time and effort and housing and salaries, etc? In that case, we would be back to the original (retail) valuations.

    25. Re:creditors and dead code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certainly you do not own it, you probably signed employee agreement stating you wouldn't have this code around home anyway :) That's assuming they kept and organized the employee records once the company went belly up.

    26. Re:creditors and dead code by godal · · Score: 1

      If they don't owe creditors any more, previous sheareholders are beneficiaries.

    27. Re:creditors and dead code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Realizing that as an AC, what I write probably won't be read, but:

      If you tell that lawyer you have something from this company of value, it should technically belong to the company's creditors - I assume it went out of business for a reason, correct?

      What if it didn't? I was part of a company that closed because they simply ran out of money and the president didn't want to go to a bank and get a loan when he didn't see any viable prospects opening up. We theoretically closed in the black (though, of course, I didn't see the numbers). Who owns the code then?

    28. Re:creditors and dead code by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      He doesnt, he works for MS.
      But seriously - it may be just as well to develop something similar, using the techniques uyou used to code the original - if you were one of the original coders, you can probably write code that does a similar function without looking the same(obfuscation, refactoring(probably better)).
      Write the system in a different language, or using alternative choices of APIs.
      After all, taking the Example of MS Word, there is common features that are important - having the same or similar features, implemented in a different way(different gui etc) should not be a crime. - IANAL

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    29. Re:creditors and dead code by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Nice excuse. But I don't accept the reasoning.

      A reasonable markup for handling charges is acceptable between volume pricing and one-off pricing. Otherwise, it's saying that the market is being manipulated in a deceptive manner. (Surprise!) This is typical action for a monopoly that can get away with it, but it's not ethical and it probably isn't legal.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    30. Re:creditors and dead code by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      What's to stop me from doing that for my personal income tax?

      The IRS rule that limits Schedule C (self-employment) tax deductions from nonprofiting business to the actual funds from the business.

      I.e., if I spend $500 to operate my book-selling business, and only make $450, I don't get to deduct $50 from my taxable income. If I make $550, however, I only need to increase my taxable income by $50, rather than $550.

      MS can pull this off because their employees and stockholders all pay income tax.

    31. Re:creditors and dead code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What did you just call that guy?

  38. Still going. by jmkaza · · Score: 1

    Mohawk is still available for sale here.

    Maybe you could call them and find out who they buy it from.

    1. Re:Still going. by pipeb0mb · · Score: 2, Informative

      I feel really bad for anyone that buys this stuff and has a problem.

      There's no one to support it, no patches, no updates. :(

    2. Re:Still going. by HELLO.JPG · · Score: 1

      What is that child doing to th

    3. Re:Still going. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should put the source code on your company's web server and distribute it illegally to thousands of nerds

    4. Re:Still going. by beee · · Score: 1

      Stuck at 99% can someone reseed Mohawk.iso

      --


      + Donald Gunth
      + Email: dgunth@quicktek.net
      "Caffeine is the greatest lubricant ever created." -ESR
    5. Re:Still going. by Trusted+Content · · Score: 0

      Hoppin on

      --
      OMG OMG LUNIX OMG
    6. Re:Still going. by Croaker · · Score: 1

      I still see copies of Chiliware's stuff floating around MicroCenter's bargin bin shelves from time to time, for the princely sum of $1 or somethine like it. I suspect they are just selling old used copies, and not newly made ones. They even still have some Loki games still in stock (the Quake 3 boxes had little stickers on them telling you how you could download the Windows version to work with the datafiles from the Linux version, even :).

    7. Re:Still going. by gniv · · Score: 1

      That's actually an ad for amazon.com. The Chilliware page at amazon is here. They also list Mentor and iceSculptor, but the latter is out of stock. The others are probably old copies, since they have just a couple in stock. And the prices are outrageous for such old, unmaintained products.

  39. Where do my binary children go now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To the 011, of course.

  40. Simplest answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to see so much work wasted and lost to the ages. So, Slashdot: What do I do with this source code?

    The simplest solution is to just wait the 150 years, and the code will enter the public domain, for the enlightenment of everyone.

    (Assuming, of course, that Congress doesn't issue another few extensions.. and that there is anything left to run the code on in 150 years.)

  41. Does "adverse possession" apply to software? by dcavanaugh · · Score: 1

    If you can find no evidence of the product for sale, I wonder if it is possible to make productive use of the code and how much time has to elapse before you claim ownership.

    If your lawyer determines that adverse posesssion is not applicable, I wonder what other "abandoned property" laws might be useful.

    1. Re:Does "adverse possession" apply to software? by Nukenbar2 · · Score: 0
      Adverse posesssion is a term relative to real property. It has no application here.

      Abandoned property only works with physical property. Again, no application here.

  42. Familiar situation by slusich · · Score: 1

    The company I work for had a huge support contract with a software vendor. When that vendor closed down we were out the money for the rest of the year and were faced with either not having support, or paying another vendor (who had purchased the source) for the same support.

  43. Go away, Darl by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    He didn't say it was Linux code.

    1. Re:Go away, Darl by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      Like SCO cares.

      All your code are belong to us.

  44. SCO AGAIN by mausmalone · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    SCO OWNZ EVERYTHING LOLOLOLOL THE X-BOX CONTROLLER IS HUGE!!!!!

    Seriously, this is becoming the "take my wife, please" of Slashdot. Or possibly Slashdot's own "It's a trap" a la SA. It's a dead horse. Stop flogging it.

    --
    -=-=-=-=-=
    I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
  45. Moi by laugau · · Score: 1

    All your binaries are belong to us.

  46. My company folded by way0utwest · · Score: 1

    i.e., ran out of money and the investors declined to send more. The IP, which included the code was owned proportionally by the investors. It was sold to another company whose business model was to buy IP and then license it out at a fraction of the cost the company sold the products for.

    I don't have the name handy, but I wouldn't doubt if all Chiliware IP was owned by some other company. You need to contact a corporate executive, preferebly a legal counsel.

  47. Really and truly abandoned? by swb · · Score: 1

    Let's say for argument's sake that the source code really and truly didn't get included in the liquidation, and wasn't included in some blanket "..and all other assets of value or works produced thereof.." statement.

    Does ANYBODY own it at that point? Is it considered public domain? Can it be re-copyrighted?

    I'd guess that most liquidations do include a statement like that above, just to prevent stuff from slipping through the cracks -- name all the nameable stuff, and then have a catch-all for everything else.

    1. Re:Really and truly abandoned? by Xerithane · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Let's say for argument's sake that the source code really and truly didn't get included in the liquidation, and wasn't included in some blanket "..and all other assets of value or works produced thereof.." statement.


      This contradicts itself a bit. Since software authored by members of a corporate entity is automatically copyrighted by that entity it becomes an asset. Instantly. Just because they don't know about it, doesn't mean it isn't there. Just because they don't know, doesn't mean it's not theirs.

      Does ANYBODY own it at that point? Is it considered public domain? Can it be re-copyrighted?

      If the company simply stops operation, than yes. It will revert back to the original author (I believe, I'm not 100% sure on this) -- if there are any creditors or any other interested party that has control of the assets it will always belong to them.

      But no, if something goes into the public domain you can't re-copyright it. You can do a dirty-room re-write of it, and copyright that but the public domain will stay in the public domain.

      I'd guess that most liquidations do include a statement like that above, just to prevent stuff from slipping through the cracks -- name all the nameable stuff, and then have a catch-all for everything else.

      They don't even name the nameable stuff. What happens (usually) is creditors for company XYZ hire liquidation firm ABC, and the liquidation firm values everything then tells the creditors the assessed value and they get to split up the money or the equivalent in goods (if they want them.)

      This stuff has been going on for way too long for there to be things falling through the cracks. I'm sitting on tons of source code that is owned by a liquidation firm that has no clue what the hell they have.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  48. The Owner or Reciever by Virtucon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All assets including code belong to either the
    company owner or the "Corporation" under
    the Receivership. If the company was public, then a Bankruptcy proceeding will enumerate those assets, including code and the trustee then has the right to dispose of them how he sees fit in the best interest of the shareholders. If the company was private, who ever owned the company and their heirs owns it unless they sold the rights to someone else.

    I worked for a company that went Chapter 11, they still owed me money and I had the trustee come after me because work I did had tangible (read salable) benefit to clients left out in the cold. So, I cut a deal with the trustee, got my back money and some cash for finishing some work and making modifications to stuff already done.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  49. first thing I thought of when I saw BK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BK's

    But then again, IANAL.

  50. Copyright law by ravemax · · Score: 1

    Not sure if its the same in the US but in germany they distinguish between author of a software product (credit) and owner. Only the owner - most of the time the firm that payed your work - can decide what happens to the product - copying, modifying, etc.

  51. Wondered what happened to you guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still have a couple of Chilliware promo t-shirts. Sorry to hear of the company failing. I was looking forward to seeing where the company would go. Too bad it didn't survive the dot.com crash. Good luck with your open source idea for the old code.

  52. SCO by Natchswing · · Score: 1, Funny

    That's a good question. WHO will own Linux when SCO folds over the next year??

    1. Re:SCO by Natchswing · · Score: 1

      Oh cruel world! First two SCO jokes were modded funny, why oh why did I have to be the third? :)

    2. Re:SCO by JamesP · · Score: 1

      What will happen to SCO's code when it goes pop?

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    3. Re:SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll drop it in then nearest trash bin.

      If it was worth anything, they'd be selling it instead of trying to profit from everyone else's labor.

    4. Re:SCO by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Well, that depends on whether or not they are telling the truth about Linux.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  53. Enjoy! by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If it's from the Soviet Union, do whatever you want with it.

    Sell it, give it away, start you own company..

    Like no one there would care anyway, and there is no real government left and laws are no enforced anyway..

    So, get rich or be a nice guy and a hero by giving it away.

    Whatever you do, you have nothing to worry about..

  54. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP! by mausmalone · · Score: 1

      zing!

      --
      -=-=-=-=-=
      I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
  55. My last software writing job... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    On my last coding job in my contract it stated that, until the finished code is handed over to them, it was mine, mine, mine!

    And rightly so since I'm the one that brought the idea for the project to the company.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  56. IOW by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Hey, I still got source coed from a defunct company..I wonder If I can make money from it?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:IOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make money off some coed? Have any pictures?

  57. Just Post It by TrailerTrash · · Score: 1

    Have someone in an Eastern Bloc country post the code, after some strategic bulk renames within the source files. Give the modules new names, change non-code related comments (e.g., author), and post away. If posted from a .RU server, and distributed via kazaa, who can trace it?

  58. Are you this guy? by Mournblade · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Are you this "Technical Development Manager"?

    Interesting (one might say prescient) commentabout Chilliware from Bruce Perens in that discussion.

    Cheers!

    1. Re:Are you this guy? by pipeb0mb · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, that was us. That was me, in fact.
      I like to think that since I managed to get 3 out the door, it was only a partial failure. Vanity++

    2. Re:Are you this guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to A/C but I've been modding this story.

      The Chilliware software boxes are visible here.

    3. Re:Are you this guy? by Mournblade · · Score: 1

      Sweet - my memory isn't as bad as I thought. :)

  59. SCO owns it. by theBunkinator · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dah. That was easy. Ask me another question.

    1. Re:SCO owns it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not funny. It looks like their assets were bought out by Caldera, aka SCO. Spooky.

  60. Re:Who owns it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The people who modded this down have no sense of humor.

  61. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1, Informative

    Excellent read! Thanks!

  62. Immortal Code by zlite · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In Feb Wired magazine had an article, headlined Immortal Code, about how some software survives the implosions of its company. "The CEO goes to trial. The programmers hit the street. And yet sometimes a piece of code is so elegant, so evolved, that it outlasts everything else." The main example was the DragonSoft speech recognition code, but it also goes into "software repo men".

  63. Here is an idea by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Please follow this up wth some attorney, then post tell us what you find out.
    Really. That wouyld be a nice change of pace.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  64. I'd say it's.. by El_Smack · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, from this line...
    "Some of you may remember us for the software iceSculptor, Mohawk and Mentor."
    I'd say Troy McClure owns it.

    --


    There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
  65. Where the code goes by dokhebi · · Score: 1

    I worked for a small software company (PDS Sports Judge) that went out of busines shortly after I started working there. I had asked the boss where the source code would go for the software, and he said that it would be sold off (by whom I don't know), along with all the other assets, so the backers were assured to get back some of their investment.

    I worked for another company that was on the receiving end of such assets liquidation sales or auctions (some being done by the IRS) and would guess that source code could be tranfered from one company to another that way.

  66. Its a corporate asset... by jordandeamattson · · Score: 1

    Just like the computers or chairs owned by the company, the copyright to the source code is a corporate asset. When the company was liquidated, it should have been listed as an asset as part of the bankruptacy (you didn't mention, did the company go through bankruptacy?).

    It is likely that in the bankruptacy judgement, the title to this asset was specifically called out and turned over to the creditors (or it might have been done in general terms as "all other assets").

    In any case, the creditors probably own it. That said, you might be one of the creditors, and might be able to get clear title to it. Or you might be able to get clear title with a promise of royalities to be paid to the creditors. Could eb some work, but you could free "your children".

  67. A little time will help... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 3, Funny

    The copyright will expire eventually.

    Just wait 70 years after everyone dies and you're home free.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    1. Re:A little time will help... by Nonillion · · Score: 1

      Unless you are Disney

      --
      "I bow to no man" - Riddick
  68. Someone threatened me with legal threats one time by eric76 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Years ago, I was Director of Technical Services (Software Development and Research & Development) for a small, high-tech company. I was also the tenth largest stockholders in the company when it went bankrupt.

    My agreement with the company included my rights to keep a copy of any and all software I developed for the company and to use it as I wished.

    In fact, some of the software came from a large engineering company where I had worked previously. In that case, I had asked for and been granted permission to keep and use a copy of a specific set of programs I had written.

    At one bankruptcy hearing, I gave the secured creditor a good copy of all the software. He asked me where I got it and I told him I made him a copy from my copy.

    The secured creditor went through the roof and started threatening me with lawsuits for "illegal conversion".

    My lawyer said that I while I would probably prevail in court on the matter because of my agreement with the president of the company, it would cost me thousands to do so.

    I'm pretty hard-headed. It didn't matter that the software had no commercial use except for a very narrow segment of companies (there were about three in the United States that did the same thing and they already had their own software), I refused to give it up and wasted a lot of money on lawyer fees to keep it. The bad thing is that my lawyer took it upon himself to start negotiating away my rights to keep the software without telling me.

    So I fired the lawyer and kept the software.

    Since neither of us really had a use for the software, he never did file suit against me and I still have a copy of the software.

    All I need to use the software, besides a reason to use it, is a PDP-11 and a VAX.

  69. Somebody's gotta own it... by LostCluster · · Score: 1

    If nobody owns the IP rights to something, that means it's in the public domain. So, if the people who should know are responding "no one" owns the rights, and they're right, then it's public domain and you're free to do what you want with it. That's doubtful to be correct.

    IANAL, but my understanding of the matter is that the IP of a dead company depends on how the company died:

    If the company ended in bankruptcy... then the creditors of the deceased company that got left holding the bag still have the IP in their bag. At that point, this IP is hostage, waiting for somebody to pay off the debts of the forgotten company. Usually, that's more than it costs to do without it.

    If the company got bought out at the end... whoever did the buying likely got all the IP rights the former company had, so that's the chain you've got to follow.

    If the company wound down operations orderly: Well, they either transfered the IP assets to someone/something, or they weren't as orderly as they thought when they wound down. The net result here seems to be a back door into the public domain, since the only entity that could defend the copyright has already killed itself.

    So, anybody wanna pick what I just said apart now?

  70. News for nerds, not lawyers by Unregistered · · Score: 4, Funny

    /. is not the place to go for legal advice. A lawyer is. If you listen to /. you're gonna be following the advice of people who are just talking out of their ass and get in trouble.

    I can see future Ask /.s:
    I got charged with DUI. What do i do?
    I got arrested for murder. How can i get off without having to pay for an expensive defense?
    I plan to rob a bank. Any tips?

    1. Re:News for nerds, not lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just ran over Darl McBride outside SCO headquarters. I'm pretty sure he was still breathing when I left, but he was bleeding from the ears and twitching.

      What do I do?

    2. Re:News for nerds, not lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go back to the scene and finish him off.

    3. Re:News for nerds, not lawyers by swordgeek · · Score: 2, Funny

      For gods' sake man, take some damned responsibility for your actions!

      Get back there and finish the job!

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    4. Re:News for nerds, not lawyers by Coneasfast · · Score: 1

      /. is not the place to go for legal advice. A lawyer is. If you listen to /. you're gonna be following the advice of people who are just talking out of their ass and get in trouble.

      This person is asking for general info, I doubt he will take it as formal advice. This is free advice, so at least he gets an idea of other peoples' opinions and to hear if anyone has been in the same situation. A lawyers costs ... well im not sure but it is a lot more than free.

      But yes, like the last 100 of you have already said... he will have to see a lawyer, eventually.

      --
      Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
  71. Corporate Shell? by istartedi · · Score: 1

    If the code was never sold, you may be able to pick up the "corporate shell" for a very reasonable price, and claim ownership.

    I've heard of this happening on occasion for other reasons (e.g., somebody liked the company name and/or logo).

    Why just get the source code, when you can get any proprietary fonts, logos, letterheads, and other junk as well.

    Of course the shell might still have liabilities and other hassles, and of course... wait for it...

    IANAL

    Get a lawyer.

    My crappy ISP hasn't routed worth a d*** lately. I'm not previewing this post.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  72. Code Escrow, anyone? by rfreynol · · Score: 1

    Most real software companies but their code in escrow, since many big businesses require it. If the software company goes out of business, the code them goes to whoever is designated in the escrow agreement, usually the customers. The customers are give the code, but not the IP, for the purpose of maintaining the application themselves.

    Working as a consultant, I've seen quite a few companies that are supporting an application using code aquired from escrow when the vendor folded.

  73. You have to be kidding by siskbc · · Score: 4, Interesting
    4. Convince them to assign the rights collectively to the old development team, under an open license. This way, both the old developers and the general public will benefit. That's what any respectable company would do.. (of course, ideally, said company would not have produced proprietary code to begin with and this wouldn't have been an issue)

    Right, and then we'll all dance in fairy land and everyone will be happy. I mean seriously, there's no chance in hell that would happen. If the team ever did anything worth a damn with it then the lawyer might have his boss come in and say "Why the hell did you give this away, you are FIRED!"

    I mean, that's just not the way this world works. I'm pretty sure parent is a troll (and a good one! ;>), but it does raise a good point, namely the following...

    The only chance you would have of open-sourcing this would be for the guy to convince the company to donate it to FSF or some other non-profit. The FSF would then value the code at some ridiculous value, giving the owner a massive tax write-off that is much more valuable than it sitting around collecting dust, and more than the guy could have ever paid for it.

    That's the only chance of open-sourcing this stuff.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:You have to be kidding by pfleming · · Score: 1

      The FSF would then value the code at some ridiculous value, giving the owner a massive tax write-off that is much more valuable than it sitting around collecting dust, and more than the guy could have ever paid for it.
      One of the biggest misconceptions regarding the tax code is the value of donations. For instance, someone wanted me to tell him that it was ok (and legal) to value a donation of printing based upon what he could have charged for it (about $.05/copy) because he could get a valuation of the retail value of the copies.
      The way it really works is more along the lines of: How much did it cost the company or individual doing the donation? In the above example maybe they could write off the amount that was donated- development costs if it was never publicly released and they *paid* development costs.

      Of course this is Russian Developers so probably nothing will come of the donation avenue.

    2. Re:You have to be kidding by Ogerman · · Score: 1

      Right, and then we'll all dance in fairy land and everyone will be happy. I mean seriously, there's no chance in hell that would happen. If the team ever did anything worth a damn with it then the lawyer might have his boss come in and say "Why the hell did you give this away, you are FIRED!"

      Sure, they can try to sell it to somebody first. But who's going to buy some random old code from a no-name failed company in Russia. If it turns out that nobody wants it (which is usually the case in these scenarios), it would only be right to let the original development team take it and do as they please.

      The only chance you would have of open-sourcing this would be for the guy to convince the company to donate it to FSF or some other non-profit.

      There's also the Blender approach: free the code once a reasonable amount has been raised to recoup some of the development costs. Of course, Blender was something that people actually wanted.

    3. Re:You have to be kidding by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Put the code on an FTP server with anonymous access and place the address on SlashDot and an ad in the newspapers and ask them to come pick up their fucking code which you have been looking after for the last few years. Charge them rent on the hard drive space and cartage to take it away ;->

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    4. Re:You have to be kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >There's also the Blender approach: free the code once a reasonable amount has been raised to recoup some of the development costs.

      Blender is unique in that it had a rabid fan base, amd a shortage of open-source coders to clone it.

      The above is still true, if you witness the Blender debates over the app's GUI.

      > Of course, Blender was something that people actually wanted.

      Critical point, but credit I believe falls on everyone involved. All along and before the bankruptcy, NaN knew there was interest by the open source/gpl community.

      The lawyers and creditors don't know a damn thing except SEVERAL of the NaN folks were convinced the code could be sold as "donation ware". That was enough for them.

      It's pretty hard to do anything several years later. And in this case, is there a market in selling Apache admin tools for regular Linux... when there is so many alternatives available for free?

      This is EXACTLY why copyrights need shorter lifetimes, and frequent renewal. Chances are the lawyers would not renew because they know it's a pile of shit (unless someone wants to buy it of course..)

  74. Find the Bankruptcy Filings by rednaxela · · Score: 1

    1. Find out which bankruptcy court the company filed in. 2. Go to http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/ 3. Get a pacer account. 4. Search the court filings for the party name. 5. Download the plan of reorganization or liquidation. If the filings aren't available electronically, contact the clerk of the court and request a copy. You can find the number for the clerk on the court's homepage. The bankruptcy plan lays out who owns what following reorganization or liquidation. Look for a clause regarding "intellectual property." Pacer will cost you $.07/page to view the docket - probably a couple of bucks. Ordering the filing from the court will cost you more - $.10/page or so for the copying, plus postage.

  75. Re:Mmmm mmmm, That's some good code! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yeah, right, we don't need you unleashing any more uncommented spaghetti code, written by vodka-addled psychotics, upon the unsuspecting public!
    You obviously don't know a thing about (ex)Soviet programmers. They're good. In fact, they're so good that it allows a small Soviet team to make a flight simulator absurdly superior to the multimillion-dollar Combat Flight Simulator. Made by Microsoft which, despite their historically awful code, isn't a Russian company.
  76. Oh yes! by grasshoppah · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "It's a great deal of well commented and well written code, performed by over 100 developers in a former Soviet Republic"

    in soviet russia the source code owns you!

  77. Depends what you want to do with it... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you just want to release it under some sort of free license, put it out there anonymously. If you want to profit off it, release it commercially and wait for the lawsuit. If it's a commercial success, settle out of court and get the company to hire you to continue work on the product. If it's not a commercial success, there aren't going to be any damages anyway. And remember, you can't be sued for punitive damages until the copyright on the software is registered. I assume the copyright for this software has never been registered. If it has, then there's the way you can find out who owns it.

    1. Re:Depends what you want to do with it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This information is not correct.

      Talk to a lawyer.

    2. Re:Depends what you want to do with it... by rssrss · · Score: 1


      Ignore the other guy. Lawyers cost money and for the most part they are not worth it. M. Dipierro has the right analysis. Check the the copyright registry. The odds are that the stuff they could find when they shut down got sold to a liquidator for ten cents on the dollar and the lawyers, accountants and bankers have closed their files, written off the account and been laid off themselves. Most likley no one will give a damn unless you start to make real money, in which case they will be all over you, but, so what, you will be making real money and you will be able to make a deal. OTOH if you don't make money no one will bother you. Nothing ventured, nothing gained.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
  78. Slashcode - no year of post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on Monday October 23, @11:36AM

    but what frikking year was the comment made?

    1. Re:Slashcode - no year of post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "by Chilliware (215893) on 11:36 AM -- Monday October 23 2000 (#684158)"

      You have to change your date display settings in the /. preferences

    2. Re:Slashcode - no year of post? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      Cool... I changed my preferences and now it looks like this:

      "Greetings from Chilliware... (Score:5)
      by Chilliware (215893) on 10 ish (#684158)
      (http://www.chilliware.net)"

      Wow... I can configure Slashdot to give me an absolutely meaningless date/timestamp! Now *that's* creative.

      And to make it even better, chilliware.net is now a search portal! But that's still not as good as it could have been.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    3. Re:Slashcode - no year of post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Monday October 23rd occured in 2000. Of course it occured in other years but that would be the only year that is relevent.

      -- Tag line. We dont need no stinking tag line

  79. As usual... by chrystoph · · Score: 1

    There is far too much prsumption of knowledge in this forum.

    Did you sign a document seeding the company IP rights. This is important because you have the rights to the software based on the fact that you never sold them to the company in exchange for employment. This is done on a per person basis.

    If not, retreat to the fellow who outlined the several steps of discovery for who acquired the company's assets.

    --

    -------------------------
    As easy as herding cats!
  80. I know who... by moojin · · Score: 0

    SCO DOES!

    --
    Why did I lurk so long before registering for a Slashdot account? I could have had a Slashdot ID of less than 100000.
  81. Who cares about source code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I want to know is, who gets to "own" the Aerons?

  82. Are you feeling lucky? by RealAlaskan · · Score: 2, Interesting
    What do I do with this source code?

    If you're feeling lucky, you could simply publish the source code. Assuming that there are no trade secret issues, putting it on your website for public comment might not involve any serious liability.

    Two things (at least) could happen:
    1) The real copyright holder might notice, and answer your questions.
    2) Nobody might really care, in which case you could eventually do something more daring.
    3) SCO might sue you for infringing their copyrights on Unix^H^H^H^Heverything.

    Option (1) could involve a bit of embarrasment for you, but if you weren't distributing the code, or claiming the right to do so, I imagine that you' probably get away with it. Or not. Talk to your lawyer. Get someone in Nigeria to post it.

    Option (2) isn't so good, either. Although you never get in trouble, you really can't distribute or license the code. MAybe you could start a project to reimplement the functionality?

    Under option (3), at least you would get some serious publicity on Slashdot.

    1. Re:Are you feeling lucky? by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1
      You know, I forgot to answer your original question: ``Who owns the source code ...?''.

      The answer? NOT YOU.

  83. as your attorney... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As your attorney I must advise you that you'll need a very fast car with no top and after
    that, the cocaine. And then the tape recorder, for special music, and some Acapulco shirts...
    This blows my weekend, because naturally I'll have to go with you -- and we'll have to arm
    ourselves.

    1. Re:as your attorney... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...to the teeth...

  84. Donation and write off? by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

    Could you set up an open source project that qualified for tax deductible donations, and have them donate the code?

  85. Re: Ask a Lawyer by booch · · Score: 5, Funny
    OK, we really need a new acronym here. IANAL is good, but we really need something better. Here are some ideas:
    • AAL - Ask a lawyer
    • OAACPLA - Only an attorney can provide legal advice
    • TISDWWK - This is Slashdot; we wouldn't know
    • DYALTFYC? - Do you ask lawyers to fix your computer?
    • RAM:IWNASDFLA - Repeat afer me: I will not ask Slashdot for legal advice
    --
    Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
  86. Just do what I do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I've worked for several sucessful software companies. I just take their code, anonymize it by changing names, etc. then create a sf.net account through a variety of psuedonyms and publish it under the GPL.

    Next fork it through freshmeat and a couple of public repositories...it's pretty hard to track.

    OpenOffice? That was me. I took the source from an old release of Microsoft office and the rest is history.

    Eclipse? Yep, me too. Started off as VCP++ 3.3

    CVS? That was my first. I was paranoid, so I just started with the guts of an old version of Visual SourceSafe.

    GNU C compiler? Funny story, it all started when Gates left an old eight inch floppy on his desk, hand-written label "Microsoft Basic 1.0".

    Sorry, gotta go. The groupies are here so it's time to smoke a bag and play some old stones tunes before the orgy.

  87. Who owns the source code? WE DO, WE DO... by Cirrocco · · Score: 1

    Who puts potholes in the road?
    Who owns all the source code?
    WE DO! WE DO!
    Who put Microsoft on top?
    Who gives the public code that's slop?
    WE DO! WE DO!

  88. Transvirtual's PocketLinux/JVM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    was GPL'd and transferred to the Kaffe project after Transvirtual folded. I wonder how they got the permission of the creditors? Perhaps you might ask someone on the Kaffe mailing list.

  89. It's 'work for hire' by Uzik2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The owner of the company owns it. He hired you, and the others, to produce it. If the owner of the company cannot be determined or there are debtors they can claim an interest in the software. In short, not you. I would imagine if you express interest in releasing it they might be willing to restart the company or at minimum will want a significant portion of the revenues. It might be negotiable though. Ask them, all they can do is destroy your dreams with crass demands for money.

    --
    -- Programming with boost is like building a house with lego. It's a cool but I wouldn't want to live in it
  90. Chilliware was privately held. by David+Hume · · Score: 1

    From the question: "It's a great deal of well commented and well written code, performed by over 100 developers in a former Soviet Republic"


    From your response: "go to the web site of the Secretary of State for your state"

    Somebody didn't read the question very carefully...


    While Chilliware may have employed developers in the former Soviet Union, this press release states that it was a privately held corporation located in Los Angeles, California:

    About Chilliware, Inc.

    Chilliware, Inc. is dedicated to making Linux the desktop choice by developing quality Linux software products and providing premier technical support for all Linux solutions. Founded in February 2000, Chilliware offers products and services to Consumer, B2B, Enterprise and OEMs, and offers Linux users online solutions for their desktop needs. Chilliware has also established a network of Linux community-oriented web sites offering the latest content on systems, applications and Linux news. Privately held, Chilliware is based in Los Angeles, California.


    I doubt it was incorporated in the former Soviet Union. Probably Delaware or California.

    1. Re:Chilliware was privately held. by arkanes · · Score: 1

      If it was operating in the Soviet Union, though, then Soviet contract and copyright law would have some say here - I don't know how international law like this works. Don't you have to have a shell company in the other country, or something?

    2. Re:Chilliware was privately held. by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Russian law would have no bearing. They subcontracted people in Russia to do some coding, that is all. those people in Russia own nothing, they were contract employees for the company. They may have had an office there, or perhaps hired the people from an employment agency in Russia, but who cares. The employees don't own any more of that software than a MS employee owns Windows code. Repeat after me: Russian law is irrelevent. Only pieces of code owned by this American company were developed there, and the American company owns the code as a whole and in parts.

      All that matters is the company, and the laws where IT was incorporated. Like someone else said, most likely California or Delaware. Lots of companies incorporate in Delaware, since they have good pro-business laws.

      If you go check out Russian copyright law, you will see that they do not respect copyrights in any reasonable fashion, thus no company would ever incorporate there. They consider most IP to be public domain.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    3. Re:Chilliware was privately held. by arkanes · · Score: 1

      It's actually VERY relevent, especially if, as you say, Russian copyright law is so permissive. Russian employees working in Russia wouldn't be bound by American copyright laws. I'm not sure why you think local laws wouldn't apply here - after all, thats why corporations outsource things like production to third world countries. If only the laws of the country they incorporate in applied, they'd have to pay American minimum wage. Companies incorporate in Delware because thats where you have to sue them and thats who governs things like thier paperwork and taxes. It doesn't have anything to do with being able to ignore local laws in other places, or being able to extend laws to places where they don't exist.

    4. Re:Chilliware was privately held. by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 1

      A simple test for your hypothesis. If Russians who coded for me have arbitrary claim to my code that say, Indians (or even Americans, imagine that) would not have, why would I risk doing the work in Russia? There are plenty of places to get cheap labor.

      Result: No, they have no claim or noone would be doing business with them in the first place. Too risky.

    5. Re:Chilliware was privately held. by arkanes · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be the first time a start up didn't check things out in detail... In any case, while they may (almost certainly would not) have arbitrary claim, as you say, the fact that company no longer exists and that some, at least, of the code is still around may have other consequences. Whats the term for copyright in Russia? Do you have to file for extensions? Etc.

  91. Contact the receivers by duffbeer703 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You should be able to locate whomever bought the assets of the company from the records of the Bankruptcy Court or from the Bankruptcy Trustee.

    If you know what you are doing, use a court-document search program like PACER. http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
  92. Corporations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Corporations, like Chiliware Inc. are a fictitious entity. You probably signed a Non-Disclosure Agreement when you started there. If so, this probably included a clause stating that anything you developed while working there was property of the Corporation. If this is the case, the rights to that software went under when the Corporation did. You can try to fight for it, but it will probably be a useless battle.

  93. to the DOJ by RestiffBard · · Score: 1

    hey, you guys, you know, the DOJ lawyers we talked to a while ago. Now would be a great time to pipe up and get some +5 Informative Karma.

    --
    - /* dead coders leave no comments */
  94. SourceForge by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    Post it anonymously on SourceForge, then at least some people may look at it.

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  95. Ask yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what would Matlock do?
    That's how I answer all questions in my life.
    It helps to go into a drug induced haze beforehand.

  96. Re: Ask a Lawyer by hazem · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, there is some benefit to asking for this kind of advice - but not to determine the course of action. Rather, for getting an idea of what's possible before seeing your lawyer.

    If I were to get divorced (I'm not even married), I'd be talking to my divorced friends to find out what I can expect on the legal front - not because they're legal experts, but because they have experience dealing with my situation. They might be able to help steer me away from bad advice, or help me know what questions I need to ask.

    I definitely wouldn't "ask Slashdot" when I've been caught with 40g of cocaine and a 12 year old prostitute in my car. But it is perfectly germane and sensible to ask a bunch of coders about their experience and advice in a situation dealing with writing software and the legal ownership of that software.

  97. ah, grasshopper by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    for BSD nirvana you might want to walk to /usr/X11R6/bin/enlightenment

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:ah, grasshopper by temojen · · Score: 1

      no enlightenment in (/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr /X11R6/bin:/home/trent/bin)

  98. Sort of in this situation by CharlieG · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Years ago, I was asked to maintain a piece of software where the author distributed the code, but maintained copyright

    The author then died, with no heirs, but he had assigned the software (In code comments) to his employer. I called the employer, and asked. I was told, "Do what you want with it - it's yours". Unfortunately, I've never gotten a letter, so I have never really continued. If they want my changes, they can have them. Much better products have come along in the 7 or 8 years

    --
    -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
  99. only if by SHEENmaster · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    you license SCO software, use Linux, or come withing 300 feet of either. In any other case, Microsoft owns it.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  100. Prevention? by 4of12 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sounds grim but true.

    So I have to wonder,

    Why don't corporations have easy legal means for property disposal after "death", just as Last Wills and Testaments offer individuals a convenient means for avoiding probabe and all those complications?
    Is it just that no one thinks their corporation will ever die? Are bankruptcy proceedings so sloppy that they leave any property unassigned?

    And, if there is no hope for this particular after the fact problem, or for corporations to put in general legal safeguards for tidy disposal of property without the need for expensive lawyers, then is there some small "sunset" clause that software developers could put in their code to ease the transfer, like a quit-claim that goes into effect if the corporation dissolves and no creditors assert any rights for a period of one year.

    IANAL, but, now and then, they're indispensible.

    [It's too bad the code author didn't have some claim on the company's assets, such as a paycheck that didn't come. I could see where he could submit a claim as a creditor and negotiate to settle for said source code.]

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Prevention? by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 3, Informative
      Why don't corporations have easy legal means for property disposal after "death", just as Last Wills and Testaments offer individuals a convenient means for avoiding probabe and all those complications?

      They do. Assets are liquidated. Banks get paid, bond holders get paid, preferred stock holders get paid, and then common stock holders get anything thats left. Theres no "last will and testement" because the company doesn't get to choose who gets paid off when they liquidate - The courts decide which creditors have first pick. Everything gets assigned to someone. The code the original poster asked about undoubtably belongs to _someone_, either creditors or someone who bought it and gave the money to the creditors.

      Are bankruptcy proceedings so sloppy that they leave any property unassigned?

      Generally not. Creditors tend to fight tooth and nail for anything thats of value.

      --
      Why?
    2. Re:Prevention? by MrSubtle · · Score: 1

      The main reason that companies don't have good mechanisms for handling the disposal of source code after death is that the legal environment that rules such things was created long before the advent of software and the assumption is that all of the assets of the company have a fixed value which will be liquidated and distributed to stockholders when the company dies. Source code by contrast can be distributed to many people as easily as one, and it has no value at all unless there's someone (or many people) to bring it to life. That doesn't fit the model of real estate, buildings, machine tools, warehoused product, and office furniture. Personally, I thinhk that the idea of looking up the lawyer who handled the dissolution of the corporation and finding out who might have any rights to the property is a good idea. If you document a reasonable search and you still can't find anyone who might have rights to the stuff you might declare it to be abandoned property and take control on the basis of property rules like the folks who salvage sunken ships do. I imagine a lawyer would be able to help you out there. --Brian

    3. Re:Prevention? by hey! · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. The one thing missing here is that the very first people in line are employees. You might have some leverage if the company owed you any compensation when it folded. The problem is that the employees were probably paid everything they were entitled to because they were first in line.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Prevention? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Are bankruptcy proceedings so sloppy that they leave any property unassigned?I'd imagine that there is a default assignment, and you could determine who by looking at the court records; unfortunately, the transcript might cost more than the code is worth.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  101. Possible starting point and contact information. by David+Hume · · Score: 2, Informative

    This press release may give you a starting point and possible contact information:

    About Chilliware, Inc.

    Chilliware, Inc. is dedicated to making Linux the desktop choice by developing quality Linux software products and providing premier technical support for all Linux solutions. Chilliware has also established a network of Linux community oriented web sites offering the latest content on systems, applications and Linux news available at www.chilliware.net. Privately held Chilliware was incorporated in January 2000 and is based in Los Angeles, California.

    CONTACT:

    Dittoe Public Relations

    Liza Dittoe

    317/202-2280, ext. 11

    liza@dittoepr.com



    Perpaps Ms. Dittoe or somebody else at Dittoe Public Relations can point you in the right direction.

  102. Why Improvize When You Can Plagiarize? by filesiteguy · · Score: 1

    Ahh, chiliware. I remember them. I believe they had some Apache thingy. Anyway, here's how I see it. I did exactly this with some success. You take your old code and re-write it. Don't bother with lawyers, at least until you go public. Use what you think works in the code (you did write classes, right?) and then re-package it. The rights to the source you hold - in its current form - belong to the creditors of the company, IMO. However, you should feel free to manipulate it and come up with something unique or at least different enough to avoid any "headaches." Think of it this way - some geek card punched out some code in Fortran way back in the 50's. We've all been plagiarizing and deriving stuff from that ever since.

  103. copyright the code... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

    Print out the source code; modify it line by line; set up a corporation in Nevada; claim your close relative wrote it all as an employee and then send it to the Copyright Office to copyright it. Check and see if your former company had filed for any patents on the original product. If not, file for patents. If the creditors won't transfer the rights to the sourcecode cheaply to you, just wait to see who they sell the products to and then inform them your Nevada corporation owns related patents. Or you could go the altruistic route and GPL your modified code and then in 15 years we could have a repeat over the SCO/Linux war... Perhaps your former company's management team were either enlightened (or stupid) and they didn't copyright/patent anything...you could be the next Lotus to their Visicalc... or MSDOS to C/PM... This is just idle speculation on my part and no way should it be construed as a viable business model I advocate, patent or not on the model... :)

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  104. This is Why We Have a Copyright Office by Lucas+Membrane · · Score: 1

    Ask the copyright office who owns it. If it's not registered there, no copyright can be enforced against you for anything you do until it gets registered. If no one else is in physical possession of the source but you, no one else is going to register it. Register it yourself and you might own it. There was once a software guy who got rich enough to run for President on money made from claiming ownership without a clear title. Run it up the flagpole and see who salutes. If you make enough money to be a famous billionaire, no one will sue you for what you steal, because you will have more money for lawyers than they do (cf __ and ___).

  105. Check that law there. by siskbc · · Score: 5, Insightful
    They either deal with him fairly, or they get zilch. All he must do is "lose" the disks.

    That's a one-way ticket to jail. If he has those disks unknowingly, it's a potential oversight. However, if he 1) finds them, and 2) contacts the rightful owner, he's obligated to return them immediately. I suspect they'll record the conversation, and no judge/jury on earth will go for the old "I lost them" routine. Well, maybe the OJ jury.

    Remember, his copy is legal under fair use (backup copies made while employed)

    The hell! He doesn't have a license to anything he used as an employee. When he quits (or is fired, or laid off) his rights to use company property ceases. I've seen the fair use law, and it ain't that. If MS fires me, can I do whatever I want with a Windows CVS, like develop it into another product? Uh, no. That isn't fair use.

    and the only thing the owners can do is compel him to destroy it. They can't compel him to give the code back - he doesn't have a relationship with them anymore.

    Legally they sure as hell can. He has their property. Period. They can't threaten to fire him, but he can go to jail.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:Check that law there. by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      Why do people shout "fair use" about things like this? This is not fair use, nor does it need to be. Nothing in copyright law makes *HAVING* the copy illegal. Making it may have been illegal, but they would be damn hard pressed to prove that given the state of the company.

    2. Re:Check that law there. by sjames · · Score: 1

      Actually that may depend. Knowing oh so well how these things go, he may well have burned it onto his own CDROM using his own burner. Their property is the copyright itself. If they were so very stupid as to lose the only master copy of the IP they value so highly, it's nobody's problem but theirs.

      The sole obligation is to destroy the unlicensed copy of the software. The nice thing to do is provide a copy. The nice thing for them to do in return is to make a nice offer or if they honestly have no intention of doingf anything with it, let him have it. Possibly asking for 10% of any profits that may come of it (mostly as a sort of CYA move so they can show that they did make an effort to capture value from it with little risk)

      As to what really happens, no way to tell without trying.

    3. Re:Check that law there. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
      If MS fires me, can I do whatever I want with a Windows CVS, like develop it into another product?

      Microsoft uses CVS to develop Windows? I always knew there was something fishy going on!

      On a more serious note... for future reference: If you have something like CDs with source code that you know you are NOT supposed to have, just shut up and don't go telling the whole world about it. Otherwise you could get into all kinds of trouble.

    4. Re:Check that law there. by R2.0 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Read my post carefully. At no point do I suggest he "uses" their property at all. His POSESSION of it isn't illegal - the copy itself was authorized by the copyright holder. And if the company allowed him to take the CD's when he was laid off, the CD's are his.

      Lets put it this way. I write a doctoral thesis. A copy gets put in the university library, SOP.

      Flash forward 10 years. The university calls me to ask if I'd be willing to sell them the copyright, because the research now has value. I look in my files and realize that I have lost my only copy.

      Question - Do I have a right to demand that the University hand over their copy of my work because I have lost my original?

      Answer - Hell no. They may not have permission to use it beyond the library, but that copy is theirs, fair and square, and they don't have to give it back.

      If I meet David Drake while reading a copy of Hammer's Slammers, he can't just grab it out of my hands and keep it because he own the copyright.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    5. Re:Check that law there. by siskbc · · Score: 1
      Actually that may depend. Knowing oh so well how these things go, he may well have burned it onto his own CDROM using his own burner. Their property is the copyright itself. If they were so very stupid as to lose the only master copy of the IP they value so highly, it's nobody's problem but theirs.

      First, I haven't seen his contract, obviously. But typically, if you perform your actions as an employee, the result (ie, the build) belongs to the company.

      If they were so very stupid as to lose the only master copy of the IP they value so highly, it's nobody's problem but theirs.

      Well, if it was his job to provide said master copy, not doing so was probably a breach of his responsibilities as an employee. You can't blame the company for not having the copy if the employees didn't turn it in. That's speculation, of course.

      The sole obligation is to destroy the unlicensed copy of the software.

      Well, as above, it depends. If the build was made with company resources, then it belongs to them. If he made it with his own resources, you may be right - then destruction might be sufficient, depending on his contract.

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    6. Re:Check that law there. by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      If it's a piece of software that was never finished, and he made the copy while he worked there, wouldn't it be considered in the grey area of the law? Provided he didn't distribute it, then arguably he could claim that working at that company gave him the right to a copy of the code, though not any rights to do anything with it?

      It just seems like one of those loopholes they'd install to protect over-zealous employees from over-zealous employers...

      Any thoughts from someone who has studied cases in this realm? If not in computer code, perhaps music, or writing, or electronics?

      --
      It's been a long time.
    7. Re:Check that law there. by ftplimited · · Score: 1

      not that anyone will actually read this, as its buried in the middle of the thread, 4 tiers deep or more, but in a lot of states, all parties of a conversation have to be informed if the conversation is intended to be recorded... otherwise, its entrapment, and inabmissable evidence. one state that does this is missouri. one state that doesn't is kansas. even if your a resident of kansas... on a call to another resident of kansas, and your are in missouri, missouri law applies. saved my butt once.

    8. Re:Check that law there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because this is Slashdot and is laden with a whole collection of doughy geeks who figure that being prevented from doing ANYTHING is an infringement of their rights while the rest of us just chuckle at the immaturity of it all. Basically, Slashdot is a micrcosm of the US on the web.

  106. who'd've thunk it by DrSkwid · · Score: 1


    "Chilliware actually tries to make money from Linux applications. The company's model is similar to the one Corel used until recently. Chilliware is developing its own Linux distribution and selling closed-source applications for revenue generation. That model failed for Corel, but a slightly different approach from a more nimble competitor may yield different results...."

    http://linuxtoday.com/developer/2001030601604OPS W

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  107. In My Experience by Euphonious+Coward · · Score: 1
    I worked for a startup that lost all its customers in the crash, and closed.

    We developed lots of code, some of it quite good. When the company was finally shut down, one of the founders bid on the software assets at auction, got them for something like $1300, and GPLed it all. He's slowly getting it in shape to post to the net. Some of it was quite cool. (No doubt you'll hear about it in coming months, and fail to relate it to this posting.)

    One good thing about the crash, though, is that a huge pile of really bad code washed away without doing anybody any harm. It gives me private pleasure to consider how large a fraction of that code was in Java.

  108. Depends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Depends on how the board or CEO handled the situation. Technically it is the company's software. So who is the company? The board of directors, CEO, etc...

    When the startup company I worked for folded to get some money hte board of directors sold the rights to the software.

  109. One Thing You Can Be Absolutely Sure Of......... by sailor2003 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you take the code without securing some rights to it, and succeed in making money out of it somehow, you can be absolutely and positively sure that somebody else and their lawyer (or lawyers) will come out of the woodwork claiming that they own it, or you infringed their copyright or patent. The more money, or money making potential, others see in the code, the flimsier the ownership claims will be. Secure the rights to the code now before you invest any time or cash in it. It will be too late to do so after your success is written up in Slashdot and "Fortune".

  110. "wandering eye and hands" by David+Hume · · Score: 1

    In this post you [i.e., pipeb0mb (60758)] stated:

    "Luckily, Chilliware imploded, thanks to the CEO's wandering eye and hands."


    Perhaps the alleged victim of the "wandering eye and hands" wound up owning all of the IP (and other corporate assets) because of a sexual harrasment judgment or settlement? I'm not asserting anything; I have no idea what happened to the company. Just asking based on your prior comment.

  111. I think it depends on the state.... by msafar · · Score: 1

    Find out who and how the company was shut down. If you can't find anyone who took control of the assets, send letters to the contact person on the corporate papers (you can look this up on the Web in most states). Give them 90 days to respond, and if they don't, indicate that you consider the code to be in the public domain, and that you will be building derivative works.

    NOTE: I'm not a lawyer, but I bet some form of what I'm saying would ring true with a lawyer.

    I worked for a Dot Com that folded. They sent the "assets", including $1.5M of Indian-outsourced code to a holding company that executed the shutdown of the company. The holding company then auctioned the code off to another software company for an insanely low price (something like $100K probably -- not that the market value of it exceeded $10K).

    Now it sits on the shelf of another floundering software company, unsold and unused.

  112. California law on abandoned property by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative
    Chillisoft was in California, so California law probably applies. And it's complicated. See California Civil Code section 2080-2080.10.

    This comes up all the time, often when someone leaves property behind when they move. You'll need some simple legal advice, but there's a procedure, which involves a police report and the publication of some notices, and if nobody steps forward and claims it, it's yours.

    1. Re:California law on abandoned property by taustin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Chillisoft was in California, so California law probably applies.

      Not on copyrights. Copyrights are governed by Title 17 of the US code.

      The key thing is, what was done with the other assets of the company? Somebody got whatever remaining assets existed after everything else was disposed of.

    2. Re:California law on abandoned property by Johnno74 · · Score: 1

      Chillisoft was in California, so California law probably applies. And it's complicated. See California Civil Code section 2080-2080.10.

      Sorry dude - wrong company. You're talking about Chillisoft. The rest of us are talking about Chilliware :)

    3. Re:California law on abandoned property by sundiver90 · · Score: 1

      Note: Not a lawyer, but working on it :-) Chilliware's last business address was in California, LA I believe. As such the California Unclaimed Property Law and Regulations should probably apply. I belive the principle of Bona vacantia holds in California. Basically, unclaimed property, including unclaimed intangible property, 'escheats' to the state. This means that the state legally owns it. They in turn can sell it, if the State Controller believes the sale value is worth more than setting up the sale. If so, the sale must be "preceeded by single publication of notice thereof, at least one week in advance of sale, in an English language newspaper of general circulation in the county where the property is to be sold." Check out http://www.sco.ca.gov/col/ucp/lawregs/ucplaw.pdf for the details.

    4. Re:California law on abandoned property by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Chillisoft was in California, so California law probably applies.
      Not on copyrights. Copyrights are governed by Title 17 of the US code.
      Sorry, but no. Copyrights are property. The property in question belonged to a corporation incorporated in California. California law on the disposal of the property of 'dead' corporations applies.
  113. IAAPL (paralegal) by hummassa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But not in the US. Here (BR) every folding or closing company has its "successors", analogue to the inheritors of a physical person. The successors own the remaining assets and debts of the former company. This includes copyrights. So here, it's easy to trace the successors, and ask them to give you/sell you the copyrights. There is no "dangling" rights issue.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  114. Do NOT give it out!! by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

    Trying to sell that source, or give it away, or market the binaries yourself, may put you in deep kimchee if whomever putatively owns the IP for that company ever finds out.

    If on the other hand, that source eventually does find its way onto the net, and it can't be traced back to you, then chances are you can't be held liable. Especially if there are any differences between the released code and what you had, and they seem to be because it came from a different or earlier set. *wink nod say no more*

    1. Re:Do NOT give it out!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that there is now a history liking him (well a pseudonym) to the code and it's potential leaking...

  115. When does code go into public domain? by pOrATa+paTima · · Score: 1

    In cases like this? Will the code/IP go into public domain in this case?

    1. Company is bankrupt and
    2. Company no longer is listed as active and
    3. No owner can be contacted.

    What are the implications if you release such a code into the public domain? Will you get sued? How and by whom?

    1. Re:When does code go into public domain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copyrighted materials for Corporations created after 1/1/1978 go into the public domain after the shorter of 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation. In this case, the code was released, so 95 years from publicaiton.

    2. Re:When does code go into public domain? by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      To legally become public domain it has to placed there by a person with authority over the info.

      If you can't find a source of authority then I don't see how it will escape the limbo its in now, regardless of distribution.

      Just how I see it.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  116. "Wills" by siskbc · · Score: 5, Informative
    Why don't corporations have easy legal means for property disposal after "death", just as Last Wills and Testaments offer individuals a convenient means for avoiding probabe and all those complications?

    Well, they do, actually. There are preferred creditors, less preferred, and non-preferred. The first are banks, the last something like common-stockholders. There is a VERY well-defined pecking order - basically, the higher ups basically get what they want until the debts are satisfied, and if there's anything left, you go down the chart.

    The problem here is this guy's code is like Grandma's shitty costume jewelry - it wasn't worth Grandma putting in the will, and before she died, no one really makes a fuss about it. They likely didn't even notice it when the family divvied up Grandma's grap when she died. But if anyone actually wears Grandma's shitty old necklace to a family reunion, say, then everyone's going to get all pissed asking you how come you got Grandma's necklace. Then, the oldest sister wants it an pulls rank, and a nasty fight ensues. Yay.

    Same thing here. Everyone assumes that code is comepletely worthless, and doesn't even want it - that is, until you come along, mention that you have Grandma's necklace from the estate (ie, the source code from this project) that you weren't really entitled to. Now, everyone else ahead of you in the pecking order (ie, the preferred creditors) wants the code, simply because it now might have value. Remember, they don't care if they make money off of it - but if you do, that means they could have, and somebody's ass is grass.

    And, if there is no hope for this particular after the fact problem, or for corporations to put in general legal safeguards for tidy disposal of property without the need for expensive lawyers, then is there some small "sunset" clause that software developers could put in their code to ease the transfer, like a quit-claim that goes into effect if the corporation dissolves and no creditors assert any rights for a period of one year.

    I like that idea - problem is, I don't think it's enforceable unless it is agreed to (probably ahead of time) by every potential lienholder/creditor of the company, down to common stockholders. You could make it boilerplate. The problem is that creditors don't want to give things that might have value away, and would rather just have it "just in case." Most likely, they'll just assert their rights over all software in general, in case something comes up they didn't know about.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:"Wills" by hummassa · · Score: 1

      in case of dissolution by bankruptcy, you are right. Here in Brasil, the preferred creditors are the employers (the value of their severance payments); second preferred is the Gov'ment :-). Then the others. Hehe.

      --
      It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    2. Re:"Wills" by siskbc · · Score: 1, Funny
      in case of dissolution by bankruptcy, you are right. Here in Brasil, the preferred creditors are the employers (the value of their severance payments); second preferred is the Gov'ment :-). Then the others. Hehe.

      1 more good reason to move to Bra{z|s}il, folks. Like the supermodels and nude beaches wasn't quite enough. Hey, how's that currency though, these days? Stable? Probably more so than ours? Damn.

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    3. Re:"Wills" by chickenmonkey · · Score: 1

      What seems really dangerous here is that it's not known that one of the creditors doesn't ~already~ own the source code "just in case". In which case you just have an illegal copy of someone else's property.

    4. Re:"Wills" by whatch+durrin · · Score: 1
      Well, they do, actually. There are preferred creditors, less preferred, and non-preferred. The first are banks, the last something like common-stockholders. There is a VERY well-defined pecking order - basically, the higher ups basically get what they want until the debts are satisfied, and if there's anything left, you go down the chart.

      Having worked for a company that's been through this before, I believe the first in the pecking order is actually attorneys. After that, banks and other lein-holders, creditors, stockholders, and finally employees. Sad but true.

      (I should have been an attorney)

      --
      ***
      Radio Shack. You've got questions...we've got blank stares(TM).
    5. Re:"Wills" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple. Make a copy of 'Grandma's necklace' and give it to whoever wants it :-) along with a notice saying 'if you add shiny beads to it, you have to tell everyone how to add shiny beads' along with 'this is how I added teh beadz'

      Flame away/troll++ me. hehe

    6. Re:"Wills" by sita · · Score: 1

      And, if there is no hope for this particular after the fact problem, or for corporations to put in general legal safeguards for tidy disposal of property without the need for expensive lawyers, then is there some small "sunset" clause that software developers could put in their code to ease the transfer, like a quit-claim that goes into effect if the corporation dissolves and no creditors assert any rights for a period of one year.

      I like that idea - problem is, I don't think it's enforceable unless it is agreed to (probably ahead of time) by every potential lienholder/creditor of the company, down to common stockholders.

      It is enforceable -- it is just that it is just like any other debt or contract in effect when bankruptcy is declared. It does not get preferential treatment. That is, once bankruptcy is declared, creditors have to be satisfied in turn, the company can no longer arbitrarily chose to honour some agreements and some agreements not. And at that point the code is still an asset in the company. It would be a different thing if the contract would be effective on some other pre-bankruptcy condition, but that seems difficult to achieve.

      This makes me wonder how code escrow agreements can actually work. Clients that depend on a company being around to fulfill maintenance on some code they are using often put in a clause in the contract that give them the right to the source (for their own use only) in case the supplier goes belly-up.

    7. Re:"Wills" by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      Here in the UK, the first in the pecking order is the government claiming taxes. I wouldn't be surprised if other governments reserved the same privilege.

    8. Re:"Wills" by Szynaka · · Score: 1

      Actually here in the US the collection of taxes can acutally go beyond any corporation and go after the owners of the corporation for any owed taxes.

  117. 4. A better idea by Lord+Prox · · Score: 4, Funny

    It is presumed that the coded is gone. As in tossed in the trash, right. So do it.
    Here. 33N 38' 8" by 117W 56' 28" in back, on friday 8th of August at 11:00 pm. in a brown paper bag...
    Now you have tossed it in the trash. I'll come pick it up and do a back alley GPLing... All for only a pack of Camels and a Mt. Dew.
    Contact me for details.

    1. Re:4. A better idea by siskbc · · Score: 1
      Here. 33N 38' 8" by 117W 56' 28" in back, on friday 8th of August at 11:00 pm. in a brown paper bag...Now you have tossed it in the trash. I'll come pick it up and do a back alley GPLing... All for only a pack of Camels and a Mt. Dew.

      Screw that - I live in Pasadena, if I leave at 9:30 I can beat you to it. ;)

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    2. Re:4. A better idea by 286 · · Score: 1

      So I take it, this is your vote for a friday /. MeetUp

    3. Re:4. A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh... So this is why SCO is so pissed.

  118. OP: The very first thing you do ... by Glonoinha · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well the first thing you do is not broadcast to the world that you have all this intellectual property.

    If I had to guess, it goes something like this :

    1. Company goes belly up.
    2. You find source code to a market ready product
    3. DON'T BROADCAST TO THE WORLD VIA SLASHDOT THAT YOU HAVE IT.
    4. Change it up a little, particularly change the name and some visual aspects of it.
    5 ...
    6. Profit!

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    1. Re:OP: The very first thing you do ... by neverkevin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      7. Get sued for IP theft

    2. Re:OP: The very first thing you do ... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Well he's already established that nobody was interested. If he contacted perhaps the CEO or VP of the company and they had no idea who owned it, then it's probably out in limbo. And it would be difficult to prove who owned it.

      A more legitimate option would be to contact who ever owned the corperation (start with who ever filed the paperwork for the corperation). Then what you do is buy the rights to the name and whatever software they happen to have. The person selling it would sign a contract stating what you just bought and how much was paid. You can make the sale for as little at $1 (if who ever still owns it seems interested in you doing something with it, like perhaps putting it out as open source).

      Honestly, you haven't really thought this through. If you were willing to print out a few letters (or only one if you know what state your corperation was filed in), you'd have all the answers. PS, most corperations are registered in Delaware.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    3. Re:OP: The very first thing you do ... by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >>7. Get sued for IP theft

      Get sued by who? That's the question eh?

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    4. Re:OP: The very first thing you do ... by WindowsTroll · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Contacting the CEO or VP may not be enough. Did the company have shareholders? If so, they own it. Did the company leave any debt? There may be a line of people trying to collect, any assets, including code, are theirs.

      --
      "Microsoft has made computing accessible to a population who would otherwise not be able to use computers" - B. Kernigha
    5. Re:OP: The very first thing you do ... by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Well duh. SCO of course! :-P

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    6. Re:OP: The very first thing you do ... by neverkevin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      By the person who owns the IP. Just because you can't find the owner doesn't mean there isn't one. Once a corporation disappears doesn't mean anyone can take their IP. Like all their physical property, all their IP gets sold to pay back investors. Some times the sale of the property is handled by a 3rd party, so no one in the former corporation may know who owns it. The bottom line is someone paid money for the right to the IP and once they realize what you have done I am sure they will not be too happy.

    7. Re:OP: The very first thing you do ... by ppanon · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're assuming there was a buyer. The bankruptcy trustees would attempt to sell the IP to pay off any creditors. But if there is no entity willing in purchasing the IP, who gets it? The largest secured creditor? In exchange for what value? What if all the creditors prefer to get whatever cash they can? What happens to a company's IP assets during liquidation if there is no buyer?

      I think you need to track down the trustee that was in charge of liquidating the firm's assets. I would guess only they can tell you who, if anyone, owns the IP assets of the company.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    8. Re:OP: The very first thing you do ... by neverkevin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most likely someone will buy the companies IP to get more important things like the name and customer database. They will buy it at a rock bottom price to try and covert the customers over and make a quick buck.

    9. Re:OP: The very first thing you do ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contacting the CEO or VP may not be enough. Did the company have shareholders? If so, they own it.

      No, they don't. Companies that go bankrupt generally have more debt than assets, so the shares are worthless. As such they aren't entitled to any of the property, including the intellectual property.

    10. Re:OP: The very first thing you do ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When a former employer went out of business, all the receiver seemed interested in trying to sell were the physical assets. He showed no interest at all in the software source code or other IP.

    11. Re:OP: The very first thing you do ... by ScuzzMonkey · · Score: 1

      If he started making money off of it, someone would be interested, pretty fast.

      Even if he finds and contacts the IP owner, the simple fact that he is interested at all in procuring the rights will probably raise some interest, unless they are completely apathetic or very cool.

      --
      No relation to Happy Monkey
    12. Re:OP: The very first thing you do ... by rve · · Score: 1

      Phase one: collect underpants
      Phase two: uhm
      phase three: profit!

  119. Source Code Escrow by multimed · · Score: 2, Informative
    This is a perfect example of why geeks (and really anyone generating IP) should know what source code escrow is. Anyone starting their own company definitely needs to understand this--basically the rights to code a company generates are held in escrow by a company that does this sort of thing. A document is drawn up that outlines exactly what happens to the source code under specific circumstances for example if the company is about to go bankrupt, the source code is released to the public domain or back to the individual authors or whatever.

    As others have pointed out, without such provisions, the ownership of the source code can become very mucky--generally any creditors have claim to the company's assets. You might be able to buy the rights to the code for pennies on the dollar, but then again, the code might disappear forever if the owner doesn't care or won't sell. The legal thing to do would be to look up the bankruptcy documents and find out exactly what happened to the company's assets & then try to work something out with them. Any other actions will depend on your feelings about the risks, punishments & likelihood of getting caught. The right thing and the legal thing aren't necessarly the same thing.

    --
    Vote Quimby.
  120. Easiest solution by Gravityboy · · Score: 0

    Publish the code under your name and wait for someone to sue you. Then appologize and offer to buy the code from them. This is the easiest way to smoke the mysterious "them" out. If nobody sues you, it's yours....and remember, this is not official legal advice ;)

  121. Publish it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And see who sues you.

  122. Get the ideas!!! by Kindaian · · Score: 1

    The code is dead... the company is dead... prolly wasn't that a good code nowadays (you now program much better... and would do it much diferently)...

    In the last 3 years, many things happened... Java evolved to a more rubust fase, .Net platform appeared... your skill improved over time...

    My suggestion:

    do a list of the program ideas/specifications and redo it from that list... place the code in the trash can... it's dead code anyway...

    But IANAL mind... ;)

  123. Er... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THe statement " If it's not registered there, no copyright can be enforced against you for anything you do until it gets registered." is completely false.

    The registration of (C) only helps you a bit in a court case, but it NOT necessary to prove or disprove (C). If one has proof that they own the (C) for the code then no registration is necessary. Alternately, registration is not proof either if of prior ownership can be produced.

    Registration can be used as a /kind/ of proof which will stand only if it does not face any convincing dis-proof.

    1. Re:Er... by Lucas+Membrane · · Score: 1

      You can't enforce a copyright until it's registered. That's why we have a copyright office. If I come up with a work of some kind, I don't have to worry about damages if it somehow infringes on something that's never been registered. I only have to worry about damages for infringing on the finite set of works that have already been registered, and the copyright office can help me figure out if I have a problem. If someone else registers it later, I may have to stop copying or publishing it, but until they register, they have no recourse.

  124. Did the company owe you? by rfmobile · · Score: 1

    Did the company owe you or other co-workers back pay? Did they pay employment taxes?

    Three years may have been too long to wait but you could sue the company and get a judgement (preferrably a default judgement) assigning ownership of the source code as compensation for your loss.

    Of course, you'll need to employ a lawyer to do this.

    -rick
  125. Code ownership: common practise in Sweden by truth_revealed · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. Offer goose for code and post notice in town square.
    2. Wait 30 days
    3. If no one claims the code in that time you may keep the code and eat the goose.

  126. Did the company owe you any money? by zipgunII · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was in a similar situation. when my company went BK, I was owed about $6,500 back pay. As a result I am a creditor in the "company" and I have a lien on any "property" that the company owned. Basically, the source code for the app that I developed got forgotten about. Anyway, since I have this lien on the "property" I can "confiscate" it and use it as my own until the someone who owns the code pays off my lien. Anyway, I still have my source code, although I've been unsuccessful in making any money on it. I hope this helps!

    1. Re:Did the company owe you any money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another company went Burger King?

    2. Re:Did the company owe you any money? by rfmobile · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd say that's a very liberal interpretation.

      This isn't the same as repossing a car. Just because the company owes you money, doesn't mean you can walk in and start seizing assets. You can however get a judgement, in which case a sheriff or constable gets to walk and seize assets.

      If the company goes through bankruptcy and there are other creditors involved, the judge will make you stand in line with the other creditors. You'll all be feeding from the same dead carcass.

      Finally, if the IRS is owed money, they may cut in to the head of the line.

      If a bankruptcy judge learns that you have this company's assets in your possession, they may very well demand that you turn the asset over to the conservator or receiver of the company's assets.

      IANAL, bah!

      -rick
  127. There is no code written... by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... that cannot be re-written if the need for it truly exists.

    Using or releaseing the code yourself as others have said is extremely risky. Maybe you'll get away with it, maybe you'll be sued back into the womb. Flip a coin.

    On the other hand, if you truly wrote the code and the code itself was not patented AND you didn't sign a non-competition pact with your employer... Then spend a couple years (or however long it takes) and rewrite it. Make it better than before, start a source forge project around the idea. Then it will be yours, no question.

    But remember you got paid by someone else to do that work, it's theirs, not yours, even if currently you don't know who "they" are.

    Do the right thing and rewrite it.

    --
    Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
  128. Have you heard the joke? by JBG667 · · Score: 2, Funny
    How can 100 russian developers keep the code secret?

    I mean, who's kidding who here...

    It's a great deal of well commented and well written code, performed by over 100 developers in a former Soviet Republic

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people in the world > > Those who understand binary and those who don't
  129. "Work for hire" sound familiar? by jmichaelg · · Score: 1
    There's a provision in copyright law that accords the author of a work the copyright. Usually the way it works is programmers sign a "work for hire" contract that assigns copyrights to the company they work for. However, if you didn't execute the agreement, then you own the copyright.

    So the question is: "did you sign a 'work for hire' document when you joined the company?"

    Even if you did, if they shut down without paying you your last paycheck, you may have a case that the company failed to live up to their side of the contract - i.e. pay you for your labor.

  130. business plan? by mod_parent_down · · Score: 1

    1. Put the source on Kazaa.
    2. Sue whoever downloads it.
    3. ???
    4. Profit!!!

  131. Re:creditors and dead SCO by AndroidCat · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    If SCO gets squashed in court, I wonder what will happen to the IP that they do own? Eventually somebody will end up with them. Hopefully the ability to cause trouble with them would be reduced after a court loss, but somebody could aquire them with more mischief in mind.

    As other posts have pointed out, someone always owns the remaining assets, including IP. Those UNIX IPs are going to be kicked around for sometime. (Baring some nice company releasing it under the GPL.)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  132. I've seen this "donation" racket by siskbc · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The way it really works is more along the lines of: How much did it cost the company or individual doing the donation? In the above example maybe they could write off the amount that was donated- development costs if it was never publicly released and they *paid* development costs.

    Not really - it has an intrinsic value that is independent of their actual cost. I've seen a lot of this lately, all involving nonprofits as recipients. MS donates copies of windows to schools, and typically deducts retail price. Another biggie is companies donating patents to universities. Typically the patents are things that didn't work out for them, and got shelved. They donate the stuff to the university in exchange for a "favorable" valuation of the donation, which is typically more than they could have ever sold the patent for.

    So, from examples I have actually seen, there is frequently a disconnect between what a donation should be valued at and what's been happening. Supposedly the IRS is going to look more closely at this, but good luck there. This has been a nice loophole for a few years now, as everyone but the government wins. The nonprofit gets something that might be of some value for free, the company gets a big writeoff. The nonprofit doesn't pay taxes, so that's not a consideraton. Nice racket, eh? Some big companies have been doing this too - can't remember exactly, but Big Oil comes to mind, as does Dow Corning.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:I've seen this "donation" racket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      > MS donates copies of windows to schools, and typically deducts retail price.

      This is an urban legend. They get cost of goods, or something like that.

    2. Re:I've seen this "donation" racket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen a letter, listing the "value" of all Microsoft software donated to a small nonprofit in Philly, and yes, it was retail price.

  133. The original code may have multiple owners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many people (including me) always wonder why big corporations don't release source code for dead projects, even when the are OSS friendly. For instance, IBM and Smartsuite.

    Well, one of the best answers to this is that many products include technology from multiple sources. A company would have a hard time releasing something as OSS without renegotiating licenses with their licensors.

    It might be difficult or impossible to KNOW that the code was totally owned by Chilliware and they had the right to even distribute the full source code. Did the company buy all the software outright, or did they license modules for encryption or compression or whatever?

  134. Finland too? by siskbc · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. Offer goose for code and post notice in town square.
    2. Wait 30 days
    3. If no one claims the code in that time you may keep the code and eat the goose.

    Linus should tell this to SCO. Tell them their goose was waiting for them in '93, and now he has rights to their SysV stuff.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:Finland too? by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Hey if it worked in Finland, we'd never have Linux in the first place, since Linus could have offered a goose to Andy.

  135. Send it to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... for analysis, I will run my special software on it:

    - the software will analyze the code for patterns already registered with our database for a match.

    PS. We need the complete and original source code, any copies made will contribute to errors in matching...

  136. Re.: Lawyers by rkww · · Score: 2, Interesting
    A programmer (and most certainly not a lawyer) writes: The answer, almost certainly, is (spooky music) the bank.

    It seems to me that your best bet might be to put a notice in the appropriate publication(s) announcing your intention to appropriate the code and ask whether anybody has a stronger claim to it than you. Then cross your fingers and hope that nobody takes the bait. That's essentially what the bank would do if it found a deposit box full of stuff and it couldn't determine the owner.

    One question one might ask is whether your employers allowed you to take copies of (their) source code off site, and if so, why.

  137. You do my friend by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

    First, did the company close or go bankrupt?

    you actually do own the CDs you have. its the copyright thats in question. I wonder if they sold the copyright is their someone out their with a copyright and no code!?

    perhaps its YOU that stands to make a buck :) Though I know thats not your purpose with the code.

  138. Bankruptcy Distribution According to an Attorney by ipandithurts · · Score: 1

    Copyrights for Software Code are considered property and must be distributed if Chapter 11 occurs without a full asset purchase by another company.

    The court appointed bankruptcy administrator will take "control" of the assest and do the best to ensure payment to the creditor (with certain classes of creditors taking what was owed them prior to others). Anyway, as this code is an asset it will be liquidated along with the other assets.

    For example, the administrator may place the software rights up for auction and the highest bidder will take their rights. Or if a creditor has placed a lien on the registration rights, the rights may go to the creditor. However, one would likely argue that if the value of the registration exceeds the value of the debt for which the lien pertains, the rights should be sold and the creditor only takes the value of the debt.

    So, even if SCO goes belly up, the registration rights (especially ones SO visible) will be still around.

    Wouldn't surprise me if Solaia and/or the Niro firm bought the rights. See my journal entry of Tuesday July 22 if you want more detail on that.

    --

    Stop undressing me with your eyes. I'm ugly naked.
  139. Just take it, blame the foreign coders by in7ane · · Score: 1

    Just take the code, change it a bit, if anything ever happens later - just say you hired the 100 developers from the former Soviet Republic to write it, and that is what you got back - since they are not in the US, it's optimal to blame them.

    Disclaimer: This can and should be considered as legal advice.

    1. Re:Just take it, blame the foreign coders by phatcat625 · · Score: 1

      Just take over a large TV network and post the source code "Antitrust" style.

    2. Re:Just take it, blame the foreign coders by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1
      Reminds me of the scene in Hackers
      What's this? Is this the unnamed account in the Bahamas where the money was to be stashed? I think so!
      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  140. Re:Bankruptcy Distribution According to an Attorne by ipandithurts · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oh, so to answer your specific question, find the bankruptcy ruling showing the disposal of the assets. It should be in the Federal Bankruptcy court where the bankruptcy was filed (normally where the action was filed). You'll be MUCH better off showing up (WELL BEFORE CLOSING TIME OR BEFORE LUNCH) and being really nice to the clerks. They typically are VERY helpful, unless you're an ass to them. Which why most clerks don't help attorneys.

    --

    Stop undressing me with your eyes. I'm ugly naked.
  141. offer them a percentage renegotiable in 5 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or something

  142. IN SOVIET RUSSIA... by RedWolves2 · · Score: 1

    The code ownz you!

    Come on like you didn't that coming.

    Here is my serious side. If you have called around and made an attempt and no one knows and says that no one owns it then I think your free to use it. Although if you do go far with the code and start making millions of dollars I think then you have someone claiming a stake in ownership. I know it would be pricey but I would hire a lawyer in this situation and have them hash out the details then at least you know that all would be safe at that point.

  143. I prefer YASD or YKYBPNHTMW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YASD - yet another stupid death.
    that, or
    YKYBPNHTMW - i'll let those thousands our there in the know chuckle about this one. once i found a bag of carrots in the supermarket and thought "hey! too bad i'm not blind right now!"

  144. Like with Blender (raise fund&buy from credito by ron_ivi · · Score: 1
    I think the coolest example is of Blender (a great 3D modeling & rendering & game engine).

    As you can read on their new web site, the founders struck a deal with the creditors to buy the software for 100,000 euros.

    They reached the goal in about 4 weeks!!! As can be seen in their MoneyMeter report.

  145. The ONLY Correct Answer by Compulawyer · · Score: 1
    it depends.

    Now, what does it depend on? Well....

    1. What the legal form of the company was (i.e., corporation, partnership, etc.
    2. How it "went under" (i.e., voluntary dissolution, involuntary dissolution, bankruptcy, receivership, etc.)
    3. What rights the company had in the source code to begin with (i.e., was it created from scratch, derived from licensed code, created under licenses to patents that provided that ownership to "improvements or implementations" belonged to the licensor, "works for hire" under the Copyright Act (U.S.), etc.)
    and the list goes on and on....

    Here's something NO ONE usually thinks about - if the company just folds (non-bankruptcy) and is a corporation, most states have strict provisions about what happens to assets and how they must be disposed of. However, I'll bet that if there is a corporation, there are stockholders who have rights in that code as a former corporate asset.

    --

    Laws affecting technology will always be bad until enough techies become lawyers.

  146. Money issues by MacGod · · Score: 1
    Chilliware folded rather quickly and harshly back in May of 2001 due to money issues.

    AKA, they didn't have any.

    --
    "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
  147. The answer is 100% clear by werdna · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and it is this: It depends.

    I can fantasize all sorts of facts completely consistent with your story that would result in dramatically different answers. It just depends.

    It depends on who owned the assets before the financial worries (determining clearance and ownership of any work is not always a trivial matter; who wrote the code, were they contractors or consultants, if contractors, what do the work for hire agreements say, how about other ip, what was it derived from, any third party incorporated codes, etc).

    It depends on the structure of the company. Corporation, partnership, llp.

    It depends how it shut down. Was it liquidated, with assets distributed? Bankruptcy.

    It depends upon the agreements of everybody who worked on the software, and whether there were provisions that dealt with whatever eventualities occurred.

    It depends upon the nation and, sometimes, the state in which these events occurred.

    It depends.

    Only a lawyer can ask the questions, determine all the issues and answer them, if an answer is available.

    Anybody who pretends otherwise is lying to you.

  148. Walk Away from It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    In my case, the company going bust was not a clean thing. Each employee is owed tens of thousands of dollars, criminal charges were recommended against the company owner, but no-one had the money to press them. The (ex-)company owner is now living overseas.

    There was quite a bit of neat code and design in the company, representing years of some peoples' lives, all rotting on the shelf. My decision was to just walk away from it. If I ever want any of that code, I will us my experience to write it again, in less time, from scratch.

    Trust me, if there are scumbags involved, you are better to cut all ties and starting a new life. The last thing I ever want is to have any future dealings with my old employer. If I cut a deal to use any company property, I just couldn't trust the other side to honour their end of the bargain (as they are without honour).

  149. "disinterested parties" by perky · · Score: 1

    you mean "uninterested parties". Disinterested means that they do not hold a stake in the issue. Uninterested means that they do not care.

    --
    "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
  150. Source Code Escrow Helps Prevent This by billstewart · · Score: 2, Insightful
    A fairly common practice when big companies are buying business-critical software from other companies is to do "Source Code Escrow". Basically, some lawyer keeps copies in a safe, and if the author company goes bust or stops selling the product, the customer company gets access to the source code, and maybe gets some ownership rights to it (depending on how custom-built it is.)

    That doesn't usually determine who has the right to sell and distribute the code (usually that either gets owned by whoever buys the remains of the company or else gets sold along with the chairs and espresso machine or whatever), but it at least protects the customer against being dependent on abandonware, and the escrow agreements can clarify that the customer has access to it for N years under whatever conditions.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Source Code Escrow Helps Prevent This by paddlebot · · Score: 1

      I actually signed a source agreement as the CTO at a dot com that used Fort Knox Escrow services for the code escrow. Always thought that was the coolest name. Funny, funny though... trying to put a link to it here I found that the site isn't up any more http://www.fortknowescrow.com So wonder where the code is? Bet finding it would be a lot of google searches away. As I remember you had to pay to get the code out of escrow a fairly decent penny, like $10k. But better than being high and dry. Definately a good provision to add to any contract, even with a smaller firm if you can find a cheap way to get it done.

    2. Re:Source Code Escrow Helps Prevent This by rogueroo · · Score: 1

      Fort Knox Escrow was purchased by Iron Mountain. Appears that DSI Technology Escrow Services handles that stuff now.

  151. Flip a coin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chilliware folded rather quickly and harshly back in May of 2001 due to money issues.

    (A opposed to due to origami?)

    So, how's he going to get a coin?

  152. Peer advice forum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /. is a great place to find peers in industry who might have already gone through this kind of thing. Don't listen to opinions, of course, but maybe they point you at a precedent, a law on the books, a well-publicized example in the past, etc. These are the things you should be researching on your own (because you're a nerd and you're smart and you're good at researching) before you go to a lawyer. Then go to the lawyer prepared. Otherwise, you're probably not getting full value because you won't be able to ask intelligent questions, what-if's, or you'll be paying the lawyer to re$earch well-known related facts or cases that you can find yourself. Then let the lawyer spend those billable hours on the even higher-value stuff that he/she's best at. My experience with IP lawyers is that they appreciate clients who do their own research first. Keep the lawyers on their toes and you'll benefit.

  153. Sweet merciful crap! by Jameth · · Score: 1

    I do believe that's the first laundry list where the "# ..." could have been omitted and it would have been a sound (if illegal) plan.

    1. Re:Sweet merciful crap! by Xlucid · · Score: 1

      Except that the IP owner who could sue ... went belly up several years ago!

      After all, this is a civil, not a criminal matter surely?

  154. Re: Ask a Lawyer by eht · · Score: 5, Funny

    So what did you do when you were found with 40g of cocaine and a 12 year old prostitue in your car? My uh friend is in a similiar situation.

  155. Scott McDaniel, I own the copyright. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please send the CD's to my Post Office Box, or I will send sharks with lasers on their heads to get you.

    Google is fun for finding information about people.

    like:
    Scott McDaniel
    Technical Development Manager
    Chilliware, Inc.
    www.Chilliware.net
    s.mcdaniel@chilliware.ne t
    phn:213.365.8700
    icq:440404

    no?

    1. Re:Scott McDaniel, I own the copyright. by pipeb0mb · · Score: 1

      Congrats! You found some 2 year old information, please don't hurt me. :)

  156. Is this what happened to it? by korielgraculus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A quick google search turned up Icesoft who are selling a product called iceSculptor. Is it possible these guys bought the rights when the company folded?

    1. Re:Is this what happened to it? by pipeb0mb · · Score: 1

      Doesn't appear to be. Our iceSculptor was a PrintShop type program.

  157. Treat it as a bonus! by Neurotensor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If your company goes belly-up, and the PHB lets you go home with a company server, it's yours to keep. Regardless of how stupid the PHB feels afterwards. A gift is a gift.

    So if the PHB lets you go home with all the code, maybe you could argue (*cough* make up *cough*) that it was a parting gift for years of service?

    If you didn't start selling licenses to the code they probably wouldn't notice or care anyway, same as if you didn't turn around and sell the company server for $100k. Maybe release it as GPL? If no money is being made, the developers will probably agree with you that it was a good thing to do, while the management won't notice for years to come.

    NOTE: I am most probably an idiot. Take my advice at less than face value. Do not listen to me for I Am Not A Lawyer. (iANAL being the complement of ANAL)

  158. Not too hard to determine by rjamestaylor · · Score: 3, Interesting
    When a company closes who owns the office furniture, the wall art, the company name, the trademarks, logos...?

    Can I start a company called WebVan today? Maybe. How about using WorldCom's logo for my new venture?

    Bigger question: will anyone who can claim rights to those things pursue me if I use them for myself? Probably not -- unless I am successful. If I am successful that will get the attention of people who might have told me "who cares." If there is a legal heir, they will fight for the throne.

    I've seen the legal agreements for software ownership at software companies -- there is always a clear deliniation of ownership rights for contingencies such as sale, merger, public offering or dissolution, etc., of the company.

    In one recent agreement we had a partner who was responsible for writing and maintaining the bulk of the application system. We had contract language to the effect that if the company could not support the application or if the company folded we would obtain rights to the software. That's just an example.

    Point is, there most likely is a legal owner and if you do something unauthorized, you'll be vulnerable to legal repercussions.

    BTW: Don't mix that source code in any forum that could be seen by GNU or Open Source developers, or you'll taint the community.

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    1. Re:Not too hard to determine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      BTW: Don't mix that source code in any forum that could be seen by GNU or Open Source developers, or you'll taint the community.

      Isn't tainting the OSS community like depositing a crap into a dirty toilet?

    2. Re:Not too hard to determine by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

      no

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  159. Re: Ask a Lawyer by linzeal · · Score: 2, Funny

    You call a priest, he will know.

  160. BRL (off-topic, but you asked) by hummassa · · Score: 1

    Real$ is shaken last week, we are reforming our previdenciary (health care + pensioning) system, basically shafting the public employees (as is yours truly)...

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  161. Re:Possible starting point and contact information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn Dittoe heads!

  162. Re: Ask a Lawyer by jeffhallman · · Score: 1

    I'd bet there's a lot of people here that's happened to.

  163. Salvage by cait56 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    salvage (s?l?v?j)Pronunciation Key

    n.

    1.
    a. The rescue of a ship, its crew, or its cargo from fire or
    shipwreck.
    b. The ship, crew, or cargo so rescued.
    c. Compensation given to those who voluntarily aid in
    such a rescue.
    2.
    a. The act of saving imperiled property from loss.
    b. The property so saved.
    3. Something saved from destruction or waste and put to
    further use.

    The concept of salvage is a long established part of
    maritime law, because it was recognized that there
    was no benefit to protecting ownership rights of
    property that the rightful "owners" could not secure.
    Allowing somebody else to rescue the property would
    be a benefit to society as a whole that outweighed the
    theoretical loss to the "rightful" property owner.

    Some definition of "abandoned" software really needs
    to be developed. The only thing that is different about
    this type of "shipwreck" is that the losses are less
    visible.

    Creditors should have first claim, but when they have
    no capacity or desire to do anything with the code
    then there really should be a mechanism to allow
    it to fall into the public domain.

  164. Offer the lawyers a deal - they like money. by tinrobot · · Score: 1

    Why don't you hunt down the real owners of the software and offer them a deal along these lines:

    a) I will ressurect the code, update it, and attempt to commercialize it -- AT NO COST TO YOU.

    b) In return, I will give you a percentage of any money we make with the new product. (i.e. FREE MONEY)

    I think the lawyers would smell a potential profit and say go ahead. A little profit is better than dead code sitting in a file cabinet somewhere.

  165. Escrow and Companies.. by larzgold · · Score: 1

    Many companies, including where I work have the source code put into an escrow account, and if the company folds we will have access to the code. And the code is not released to anyone but other customers who have also paid for this right. So there are other issues besides the lawyers - its the lawyers and the lawyers of customers

  166. Copyright laws vary from state to state by spdegabrielle · · Score: 1

    What is true in the US may not be true where you are living. (Yet)

    s.

  167. Re: Ask a Lawyer by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1

    So what did you do when you were found with 40g of cocaine and a 12 year old prostitue in your car?

    No, Slashdot won't be any help. Go after the expert, Homer Simpson, for a flawless defense:

    Just say, "I thought the cop was a prostitute," and you are free to go! Judges are very understanding about these things, at least Judge Judy seems okay.

    Geez, I just realized my whole education was provided by FOX :(

    --
    Vote in November. You won't regret it.
  168. Think of it as experience... by DrCode · · Score: 1

    As others have pointed out, the code is essentially dead. It's not yours; it has no value; but if you try to use it or buy it, you'll possibly be in big legal trouble. Anyone who's been in the business more than a few years has seen this many times (often when the company is still in business, but simply cancelled the product).

    So... treat it as practice. I'd imagine the products weren't perfect, and now you know what could be done better. Re-implement the code, either keeping it proprietary as your own, or making it open-source if you'd like to get free help.

  169. meetup... by Lord+Prox · · Score: 1

    yeah, I just checked the link and I'm intrested. Just need to find a place...

  170. OT: Microsoft doesn't use CVS by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 1

    What I heard from a guy at Iomega is they have an in-house proprietary version control system called Slime, that they very carefully guard as they believe it is one of the secrets to their success.

    1. Re:OT: Microsoft doesn't use CVS by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      That does explain the gooey Windows XP look... ;-)

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    2. Re:OT: Microsoft doesn't use CVS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have also been told this by a former employee (who worked on Access, but I dont hold that against him).

      - TunaBomber

    3. Re:OT: Microsoft doesn't use CVS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, they don't. Currently most teams at MS use something called Source Depot. It's pretty advanced, and even performs well over *gasp* modem links. Neat stuff, really.

  171. It depends - but here is your answer by rtrifts · · Score: 3, Informative

    First off, this answer applies in Canada. I am a Canadian lawyer and quite confident about my advice in this country. My familiarity with American law is necessarily less thorough, but I do know the US Bankruptcy code reasonably well.

    Ok. "My company folded". What is THAT supposed to mean? Was there a bankruptcy order made? That makes all the difference in the world.

    If so - the source code vested in the Trustee in Bankruptcy. His task was to sell it on behalf of the creditors and remit to the court.

    VERY often however, this does not come to pass.

    So what happens?

    Here is your answer:

    When a Trustee in Bankruptcy does not sell an asset, the asset remains vested in the Trustee. By default, under Canadian Bankruptcy law, property that is not disposed of by the Trustee is supposed to be returned to the bankrupt prior to the Trustee being discharged.

    In practice, this hardly ever happens in a corporate bankruptcy. Trustees don't do anything they aren't paid to do and if no one is watching about i dotting and t crossing, nothing gets done.

    In Canada, the post bankruptcy corporation is neither alive nor dead. It can be revived by the shareholders but this is highly unusual and typically this is never done. A post bankrupt corporation is a lurking mess and the responsibilities for tax filings and potential director's liability issues is hardly ever worth it.

    As there is no one left around to pay the corporate fees for the corporation, it is dissolved by order of the Director of the Business Corporation statute in its jurisdiction and it becomes essentially dead. (But if someone were to acquire the shares from the former shareholder and file articles of revival, THEN persuade the Trustee (who is almost always discharged by now) to go back on as Trustee and THEN make the necessary motion to the Registrar to return the property to the bankrupt, you could then
    have the corporation AND the rights to the code.

    But - not so fast. That is assuming there was a deal in place for the corporation to actually own the code. Sometimes there is not and the bankruptcy itself reverted ownership in the code to someone else because of a defaulted royalty.

    In other words - it's a complex answer which is highly dependent on the facts.

    Under Canadian law at least - one thing is NOT true - the property does not vest in a creditor be it secured or unsecured. It is highly unusual for a creditor to foreclose and this is almost never done. The property does not belong to the creditor - the right to sell it for FMV and keep the proceeds is what the creditors - both secured and unsecured - had.

    (While I won't vouch for this analysis under US Bankruptcy law as 100% correct - it is MOSTLY correct I expect).

    So - is this lurking code something you can manage to make your own? Yes. With the fees to a lawyer and the Trustee, it's possible. The problem is, questions of this kind alert people to residual value in an undisposed property. People who are otherwise unaware of value will be alerted by your inquiries and requests.

    Which is a nice way of saying that sometimes it's best to shut your mouth and make some quiet and discrete inquiries.

    If the worst case scenario is there is some Trustee theoretically who did not dispose of a copyright it should have, and it would at law have reverted to a dead corporation, then it isn't very likely that anybody would have any right to assert that - say - code you claimed was yours was NOT yours.

    Get the picture?

    YMMV

    --
    .Robert
  172. So Who Won The Chiliware Car???? by nzyank · · Score: 1

    I remember you guys from LinuxWorld 2001 in NYC. Still have your t-shirts. You had a drawing for a car at your booth. 4WD or something I think. You never announced the winner and I remember emailing and asking about it and never got a reply.

    So was that a crock???

  173. Does it run on Unix? Then SCO 0wnx0rz it! by Bernie+Fsckinner · · Score: 0

    According to Darl McBride, CEO of the SCO Group, it is a "derivative work" of the Unixwarp OS/2 source code, and therefore the intellectual property of the SCO Group, the collection of lawyers who feast on the corpses of software companies.

  174. Re:So Who Won The Chiliware Car???? by pipeb0mb · · Score: 1

    No. Not a crock. A guy from San Francisco who worked at Sharper Image won it. I wish I had his name for you, but I don't. :(

  175. Have you checked? Chilliware likely still exists. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you know Chilliware no longer exists? Most "failed" corporations stick around for years. They often have to by law, to provide a period for lawsuits and such.

    Chilliware, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware, like a great many corporations. See the following:

    http://kepler.ss.ca.gov/corpdata/ShowAllList?Que ry CorpNumber=C2194403

    In California, it was only a "foreign" corporation registration. On Delaware's Secretary of State site:

    http://www.state.de.us/corp/index.htm

    it states that Delaware *charges* to look up corporation information. So, you must pay $30 for a written certificate, $10 to talk to somebody, or visit 401 Federal Street in Dover, Delaware to search for free.

    So spend the $10 and find out what actually happened to the company.

    Larry

  176. IP in source code belongs to the programmer by jyg1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It doesn't matter if the company has gone belly up, the intellectual property (copyright) in the source code is owned by the person who created the code, not the company.

    The original idea behind copyright in subject matter known as "works" (I'm in Australia, I know that this is the law in Australia and the UK, not too sure about the US, but should be similar) was that they are the creation of human intellect and thus the copyright which subsists in the work must be owned by a human, not a company.

    The company can own copyright in subject matter know as "subject matter other than works" which can include the mode of production which can allow the company to bring an action against people to directly copy a CD on which a program is distributed but they can not do anything directly to anyone who copies source code because they do not OWN the source code.

    As long as you are the programmer to produced the source code, you have every right to use it and distribute the programs which come from the source code. If you are not the sole owner of the copyright, you need the consent of the co-owners of the copyright and any profits which come from the use of the source code should be shared between the co-owners.

    1. Re:IP in source code belongs to the programmer by Tazzy531 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Chances are this will not hold up in US courts. In most places that you are employeed, you sign a contract giving up all claims that you may have on the IP of anything you develop on "company time." In paying you a salary, the company has fulfilled it's end of the contract. The IP and source code should then belong to the company.

      --


      _______________________________
      "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
    2. Re:IP in source code belongs to the programmer by nzyank · · Score: 1

      That's not true. At least in the US anything you do on company time is for the company and owned by them. I'd love to cut and paste some of the code I've done in the past for various companies, but if they ever find out about it we're talking big lawsuit.

    3. Re:IP in source code belongs to the programmer by Zirnike · · Score: 1
      "Chances are this will not hold up in US courts."

      Good thing it doesn't have to...

      "performed by over 100 developers in a former Soviet Republic"

      --
      I'm not shy, I'm stalking my prey
  177. Send me a copy here in Oz... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    ...where reverse engineering is legal. (-:

    What do the source files actually say? Is there a copyright message in them?

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  178. Maybe this guy knows something by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

    He sounds like he has a drive to succeed...maybe you should contact him.

  179. Since amazon.com is still selling it... by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 2

    ...they might have issue with you releasing it into the wild (amazon listing). I'm sure the software is still being sold elsewhere too. As everyone else has said, perhaps legal advice is in order. Maybe you can pick up the IP, get some VC, and soon you'll be TCB!

  180. Donating probably won't be viable by PleaseDontBeTaken · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not a lawyer. Now then...

    When there is no clear market price for what you are donating, then original cost, or if ascertainable, replacement cost, would be strong guide in determining the value of the goods provided. Depreciated original cost (whatever the book value would have been) might also be a good starting estimate.

    Donating is sometimes a great idea. The problem is that since the company went out of business, it's almost certain they lost money, thus they have no taxes to offset. If was a C corp, then unless that business revives itself without a change of control within the statutory period for reclaiming tax losses, the "losses" will never offset any taxes inside the corp.

    It would be very interesting to hear someone who knows says who "owns" the code if the corporation was formally wound-up without some of the intangible assets having been sold. Theoretically the liquidators should have gotten some value for it. It may have even been sold to the law firm or other insider for $0.01.

    I would suggest taking the "I'm poor but would like to work on this / see the code live" approach. That will lead well into either the "why doesn't the current holder give it away to something like the FSF and take the deduction" or the "what's the lowest price I can pay for it" discussion or the licensing/royalty discussion, which also sounds like a good idea.

    --
    --
  181. Chain letter by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    Send out an anonymous chain letter to a bunch of random programmers. Say they must send it to 7 other programmers or be eaten by the Taco Bell chihuahua.

    Or just put it on Kazaa.

    1. Re:Chain letter by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      Forgot to mention: Attach the source code to the chain letter.

  182. Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    she told me she was 18, it was totally consensual, and she told me she had to get this powdered sugar to her grandma pronto or the cake would be ruined!

  183. Re: Ask a Lawyer by DCowern · · Score: 1

    What about the following as a response to OAACPLA:

    KAPLA - a Klingon Attacked my Provider of Legal Advice

    Appropriate context:

    Slashbot 1: How do I GPL my file sharing application in such a way that the RIAA and SCO won't sue me?

    Slashbot 2: OAACPLA

    Slashbot 1: KAPLA

    Slashbot 2: At least he died like a warrior... with honor! To Sto-vo-kor!

    Slashbot 1: Ummm.... great... now what do I do about this application?

  184. Re: Ask a Lawyer by Geekbot · · Score: 1

    "I definitely wouldn't "ask Slashdot" when I've been caught with 40g of cocaine and a 12 year old prostitute in my car."

    Sounds like a good ask Slashdot to me. I want the rest of these details. Depending on who you were caught by I'd recommend offering them a line and a turn.

  185. Re: Ask a Lawyer by Geekbot · · Score: 1


    "I definitely wouldn't "ask Slashdot" when I've been caught with 40g of cocaine and a 12 year old prostitute in my car."

    When or if? Is there something we should know?

  186. simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    copy the code and accidently leave it behind an the next local Linux User Group meeting. Shortly after that it might a anonymously posted to a newsgroup and from that poing, the creditors have to work really hard to protect their intellectual property and you are free to work on it in the meantime.

    Accidents happen.

  187. How about GNU-lize it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Contribute o the open source project, maybe the people that spends their years working there get their name in the history book of open source.

  188. Amazon still sells it... by Lord+Prox · · Score: 5, Informative

    Found this
    And this containing contact info (may be out of date)

    If Amazon still sells this then someone is connected to the money and that means trouble... So forget droping it in the trash and I don't know you...

    1. Re:Amazon still sells it... by Fallen_Knight · · Score: 1

      While the company is out of biz, amazon might be selling it to recoup the cost of buying the software back when the company was in biz.

      And if they can't deliver the profits to anyone they problably keep them so thats why it would still be for sale.

  189. By his contract, posession probably is illegal by siskbc · · Score: 1
    His POSESSION of it isn't illegal - the copy itself was authorized by the copyright holder. And if the company allowed him to take the CD's when he was laid off, the CD's are his.

    I haven't seen his particular contract, but I actually doubt that pretty much. I haven't seen any company involved in the production of software that didn't forbid taking home copies of the code, or at least demand the destruction of same upon quitting. Also, chances are he made this copy with company resources, as people typically don't do builds with their own equipment. Though naturally he would have to substantiate. Bottom line, I would bet that copy legally belongs to them. If he made this copy in his capacity as an employee, it belongs to them and is not a personal copy. Technically, he probably has stolen property.

    Question - Do I have a right to demand that the University hand over their copy of my work because I have lost my original? Answer - Hell no. They may not have permission to use it beyond the library, but that copy is theirs, fair and square, and they don't have to give it back.

    That's different. You provided them with a copy as a condition of you graduating, and you would have signed some mumbo jumbo granting them certain rights, yada yada. However, again, I would be willing to bet that he did not have the right to possess that IP, making him different from the library you mention. At a minimum, I would imagine that he would have been obligated (as an employee) not to have removed said copy in the first place.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  190. company assets divisible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the ownership to corporate assets is given first to creditors, then preferred stock holders, then to common share holders. If you are in possesion of company property at time of company closure, you
    are asking a legal question. U don't own said property.

    http://www.westga.edu/~chodges/pdf/24FM10.pdf

  191. our clients.... by josepha48 · · Score: 1

    .... if we fold.. all of our clients are guaranteed that if we fold they get the source code, so that they can continue to use it, improve it, etc. It is part of the deal. Also the clients can buy the source code to our product if they want, but good luck compiling it, there are over 3000 generated files, 200 scripts and over 2000 none generated files, plus mscellaneous stuff. I can do though, so I'm one of about 3 people.

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!
    Does slashdot hate my posts?

  192. its not bainwashing, just common sense Im affraid by urbieta · · Score: 1

    when the schools IT manager is irresponsible, he only knows M$ trash and leaves work early every day

    a responsible school IT manager uses linux at LEAST at home and reads /. ;)

  193. Belly up != nonexistent by cheezit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    IANAL, but as I understand it a company can exist as a legal entity (party to contracts, etc) long after it ceases to exist as a functioning business.

    Whoever owns the pile of papers that represents the entity that is your former company could easily have a problem with what you are doing.

    Check EDGAR and other SEC sources (if a public company) for current contacts. I would assume a lawyer would be required to tell you when you have tried "hard enough" to contact any interested parties.

    --
    Premature optimization is the root of all evil
  194. Lose the code by Vexar · · Score: 1
    The last thing you'd want to do is carelessly store it on your locally hosted Kazaa site, available for anonymous access, or worse yet, leave the CD in a laptop that gets loaned to a friend, who needed it for a LAN party.

    You are holding onto a headache of liability. Your life will be so much simpler if it just disappears.

    On the bright side, I bet your NDA expired by now. There are some internet sites out there that have preservation as you describe in mind, and do things like keep source code to games from companies out of business. You could ask them for input.

  195. Other Old Code by Bob+Munck · · Score: 1

    Hey, I have the complete source code for HASP, the Houston Automatic Spooling Processor. It controlled card reading and printing for IBM System/360 mainframes. It's all in well-written but sparsely-commented Assembler, some of which I myself wrote. All on a little gray 9-track distribution tape that I'm sure I can get copied back to punch cards.

    What's my legal situation here?

  196. And the code becomes completely worthless. by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

    Whenever the company's creditors figure it out, any open source project with the slightest bit of code is wearing a big fat sign that says "Sue Me!" For a non-existant company with no revenue, the potential pay-off from a suit could quickly cause them to re-appear from nowhere. No honest coder could touch the stuff, leaving the code to closed-source projects. They'd likely be fly-by-night companies that wouldn't maintain it properly anyway, not exactly the kind of adoptive parents you'd hope for.

  197. What is law? Go ahead and find out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as someone retains a lawyer, it doesn't much matter if they have the law on their side. It's called a civil suit, where the actual argument can take place. Look at SCO -- it can make a huge and destructive problem without any legal case at all.

    No matter what everyone in this discussion says about "what rights you do and don't have", employee-rights contracts are meaningless when one party is defunct. All that's left are potential rights-holders. But who are they? Who could sue you? You don't even know unless you publish the code, release the product as shareware, and publicize the situation. You've started down the right path!

    You have the right to bring this up. You have the right to try to keep anything in your possesion, and it's very hard for someone to get it from you, without a lot of expense. You have the right to put the code up on a webpage if you like. Someone may ask you to take it down. If you don't, they may sue you. But they will not be able to punish you, if you think you are in the right, unless you piss off the grand jury, and the judges, and the jury, and public opinion. Not likely! And it's not likely to even come to this!

    Companies go defunct all the time. Their patents expire. Their blueprints become unimportant. Their software loses value. Their manuals become useless artifacts. Their trademarks expire. The corporation is gone. No one is responsible for it any longer. Its creditors have already settled, by default or explicitly. Armchair inheritors of non-patent intellectual property have very weak cases. They can very rarely cause an injunction.

    Publish the code. Make it shareware. See if anyone pays attention. You did your "due diligence", even announcing it on slashdot. Take a risk.

  198. Actually, that could be a possibility by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    I'd just like to point out that if this code was developed in a former Soviet satellite, and they weren't completely paid for their work, then they could have a lien against the code itself.

    In that case, you could possibly find them, get *them* to claim ownership, handle the American end of the lawsuit to get the code declared theirs, and from there get it back into working order.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  199. Copyrighted Material is STILL not property by Little+Brother · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I notice several posters talking about how to aquire assets from the company in a property-seisure and/or salvage leagal mindset. The problem is that you don't OWN copyrights. You have the right to copy the material granted by law and, to my knowledge, you cannot be forcced to give this up. (Although you can agree to, which is technicly what happens in works for hire.) I don't think even creditors have a right to copy copywritten materials unless they and the company agree to sell the copyritten material to the creditors for part of the debt.

    I am not a lawyer, am I completly off base here?

    --

    Little Brother, watching the watchers

  200. legally, the answer seems simple by 73939133 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The source code is owned by the same people who owned the computers, laptops, and any other assets of the company. Most likely, that is not you. If those people decided not to do anything with the source code, that was their right: they can waste their money any way they like. Or maybe it's not wasted: if they own another company with a competing product, the last thing they will want is for this thing to get out. So, no, you don't own the code and there is nothing you can do with it or about it unless you can establish who does and get their permission.

    There is a bill floating around Congress that would require copyright holders to pay a tiny ($1) fee every few years to maintain copyright protection for their works precisely to get creative works out of this sort of limbo. But even then, you might still be contractually bound not to disclose the software.

    If this matters to you, you could try to make it part of your employment contract next time that under a well-defined set of circumstances (bankruptcy, five years elapsed without a product), your copyright reverts to you or the software may get published. In fact, customers might like such clauses as well (source escrow). But most companies won't go for it.

  201. If it lands on its side? Rambus. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NT

  202. Re: Ask a Lawyer by goranb · · Score: 1
    I definitely wouldn't "ask Slashdot" when I've been caught with 40g of cocaine and a 12 year old prostitute in my car.
    Why not? Why assume noone has any experience with such stuff he...
    Ups... wrong discussion board... sorry... :)
  203. It varies... by curtlewis · · Score: 1

    It's possible one of the creditors snapped it up during the fire sales held by the court after the company folded.

    That's what happened to the code for a company I worked for. This big company no one's heard of was going to invest, reneged, we folded, and they swooped in. Instead of a license, they got it all, and on the cheap, too. However, they are doing NOTHING with it, which is sad as end users would like to Open Source it or at least support some company to bring it back to life.

    I'd recommend contacting the former company's CFO if you can. They are usually in the loop on what happened to a company's assets.

    You're going to need a lawyer most likely if you manage to find out who owns it, but you probably don't need a lawyer to find the owner.

  204. Who owns the source code ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The highest bidder on Ebay ?

  205. Preferred creditors first by hughk · · Score: 1
    The preferred creditors get first shot. This is generally the tax man followed by their bankers. The next class are employees who weren't paid salary, this isn't a legal preference as such but usually they get this shot. After that comes the normal creditors, such as suppliers.

    After that come the bond holders and after that the shareholders. Mind you, Venture capitalists can be quite aggressive about recovering assets.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  206. Easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dump the code in international waters, then claim salvage rights!

  207. Did the owners have an escrow agreement? by opensourcehosting.co · · Score: 1

    Another angle worth checking into is to see whether the company had an software escrow agreement. Probably the easiest thing to do is mail the various companies that provide escrow services (search for software escrow on google) and ask them. Escrow allows customers of a software company access to the source code if the company goes belly up. What they're allowed to do with the source depends upon the wording of the escrow agreement.

  208. it depends on how the company was wound down by mydigitalself · · Score: 1

    if the company was liquidated, all of the assets of the company become property of the liquidators. generally you will find that liquidators know nothing about source code and will generally flog it off pretty cheap.

    if the company was not properly closed and everyone just stopped working, then ownership of the code would be up to the courts to decide. so if you picked up the code and released it as open source or something, you could find one of the ex-directors or somebody sueing you.

    there is also the escrow angle - which i believe makes the code freely available to existing (at the time) clients. what the ramifications of this for further development it, i cannot tell you. maybe google around for definintions of escrow and see what you make of it.

  209. who owns. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple issue. You dont own the rights even if you do have the source. What you have is a copy of the final code and nothing more. The orginal code was transfered to legal owners at some point in time.

  210. Sell the owners opening the source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess a point can be made to the owners of the code that opening it up is a win for them. It would keep the code alive. If forking is not allowed (i.e. changes have to fold back into the main tree) that could be a big win for the owners... they get free maintenance and extensions in trade for a free use license. But they keep ownership on the code, at least the original code.

    If nothing happens the code is thoroughly bitrotted in 1 or 2 years.

    This point applies in all cases - whether the ownership is spread around or highly concentrated.

    Thomas

  211. Receivers / Liquidators Own the code by talldark · · Score: 1

    In the UK, I have gone through this a number of times, and I certainly know that in the UK, and in most european countries, the Bankruptcy agent / Reciever / Liquidator owns all rights to intellectual Property, and has the right to sell it on to interested parties.

    The reasoning behind this is that this is where the value in a company is, and when the company goes bust, it is generally due to owing money and investors pulling plug. These investors become the majority creditors (after the tax man and payroll), and any value left is up to the reciever appointed to sell on for as much as is possible to pay off some of the debts that are left by the company (minus the recievers fees).

    You might be able to work with the recievers even this long after the company folding, and see if they are interested in using your consulting services to help produce value in the bankrupt company, and then there may be a future for your software if the recievers can employ you to manage the software to sell on the remains of the bankrupt company to another software company that would want to take the product on..

    Cheers

    TD

  212. Found a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a P.O. box and start a compagny in one of those country that doesn't care about copyrights laws and Voila. You may even get a trip there and release the code from an internet cafe. If anyone asked, you were hired as a developper for the compagny since you had previous experience in that type of software and you never realized that the familiarity of the code was due to plagiarism. :-) BTW, I didn't read all the threads so I don't know if it's been said, but what does the software do?

  213. What I would do to set the code free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Hire a lawyer
    2) Have Lawyer find what other lawyer is handling ex-company's debt.
    3) DO NOT TELL THEM YOU HAVE CODE!
    4) Offer nicely to purchase all IP rights in ProductX for say, 100$
    5) Now as the official owner of product X, release it under the GPL.

    rinse, repeat

  214. Sell it and see if any one sues..... by thbigr · · Score: 1

    I assume there was SOME crediter some where.

    --
    Come the revolution, the Bourgeois, Capitalistic, "A PARKING STICKER HOLDERS", will be first against the wall!
  215. Oh dear god no... by Bvardi · · Score: 1

    I guarantee you - nude beaches in brazil won't be much of a draw if your average slashdot reader starts moving down there! :)

  216. Here is How One Project Dealt With It by kmilani2134 · · Score: 1
    A while back Blender was destined for the scrap heap when the developers on the project asked the management/owners of the company to work out a deal to open source the project. The management agreed to set a price, and if the developers who wanted to open source the project could meet the price, the code could be given an open source license and live forever.

    As you may recall, the blender community appealed to the larger open source community for help, and within months had raised the funds necessary to free the code.

    Unfortunately, it is much too late for this to occur in your situation. It is very unfortunate that the management in your company didn't consider doing something like this before they closed the doors.

    --
    Those who trade freedom for security will lose both, and deserve neither" -- Ben Franklin
  217. Corrected link to Blender by kmilani2134 · · Score: 1
    Bad link in my previous post...slapping myself for not using the preview button.

    Blender

    --
    Those who trade freedom for security will lose both, and deserve neither" -- Ben Franklin
  218. who owns the code by carldot67 · · Score: 1

    Technically its the preferred creditors of the company at the time that it folded. When you went under, an insolvency practitioner should have been hired to carve up the wreckage. You should anonymously approach them.
    They will try to work out how to best extract cash from the code and then (after expenses of course) distribute the cash amongst the creditors.
    It gets kinda complicated right there. If there are lots of creditors then the value will go on legal fees (sending letters etc). It will be a waste of time.
    Often the main preferred creditor is the main investor.
    If there is one big creditor, they will assert their ownership of it. It will then be sold, inserted into another of their portfolio companies, or mothballed (ie forgotten). None of these outcomes involve GPL-ing the thing.
    Corporate insolvency and venture captialism are murky worlds at best and unfortunately the legal process means that I think you will be lucky if you get to do anything constructive with the code.
    There is hope. I recall NaN (Blender) went under and the "community" raised a couple of hundred thousand dollars to "take ownership of" (ie GPL) it.
    You should decide how much work you are willing to put in. The money men will have you running round, making all the calls, advertising, going to meetings etc. It will be good business experience for you but it will take a bit of effort and you may not like the results.
    Kudos for trying though.

    --
    I wish at was Friday, but I dont want to wish my life away. So I wish it was last Friday.
  219. You don't by replay+TV+Guy · · Score: 0

    Because a "company folds" does not mean that the assets of the company are up for grabs. Someone still holds the copyrights, and patents, etc. Even in a bankruptcy, someone holds the rights to the remaining assets. Assets are sold off, and some may not. Sometimes, you can pick up some cheap patents and copyrights and win big in the lawsuit game.

  220. Next time, refer to a legal dictionary... by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    ...not Websters.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  221. gpl, hmm by buridan · · Score: 1

    well, just a thought, chances are significant that there is likely some code in any given project that is actually or obviously derivative of code that was gpl'd. if you can show that, then you can argue that the whole of the code should be gpl'd much easier. if you had that evidence in hand when you go to the lawyers, you will probably be in a much better bargaining position than you would be taking in code that clearly fits a more commercially oriented license.

  222. derivative rights for SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the letters L, l, U, u, N, n, I, i, X, x are contained in the source code, it must be a derivative of SCO's work and therefore belongs to SCO. Please purchase a license and send SCO as much money as you can. Please also purchase SCO's stock as we are trying to pump it up so our directors can sell our shares. We also have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale. :)

  223. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Profit! by Sun+Tzu · · Score: 1

    1) The company probably either archived the code, sold it, or ignored it during the assets liquidation. Therefore, all you have is a _copy_ of the code. Sit on the copy until the copyright expires.
    2) You are now in possession of _public_domain_ code -- and you are probably the _only_ person holding such code.
    3) Make a _legal_ derived product from the public domain code and register the copyright to _your_ work.
    4) Burn the original copy.
    5) ??????
    6) Profit!
    --
    Send us your Linux Sysadmin article.

    1. Re:1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Profit! by LordBrutish · · Score: 1

      > Sit on the copy until the copyright expires.

      Yeah, 96 years after the death of the person who wrote it!

  224. There's another website for that... by Threed · · Score: 1

    A post titled what happens now? about a pot bust.

  225. legally wouldn't the creditors own it by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    But generally don't the creditors sign over their rights to any potential future claims in exchange for recievers paying them off so many cents in a dollar from the liquidated assets.

    Mind you there's always creditors at the end of the list, useally the smaller ones, who don't get anything because nothing's left by then (meaning they never signed away their rights to claim any potential undiscovered assets). These are the small creditors like local tradesmen & stationary suppliers etc that did small jobs on account (like fixing a blocked toilet at the back of the office building).

    IE some plumber owns your source code

  226. Who Owns Source Code When a Company Folds? by hari_kp · · Score: 1
    The answer would vary from country to Country but here is the general picture. The Source code is the company property and until the copyright expires it remains with the company which might be alive or dead. If the company goes into liquidation, the copy right may belong to any unpaid creditor who can claim it through legal channels after issuing a public notice to that effect.

    If no creditor makes any claim for it, the liquidator of the company can sell it (or revoke the copyright of the code, not sure of this though) or grant a license to anyone who wud want to use it with/without a payment. Since in your case there is none to contact, you need to contact the Official Liquidator of the Company and not the counsel or any official of the Co. Also find out from the registrar office if the code has been licensed to any outside company and the number of years of such license.

    In any case the only person you will need to contact is the Official Liquidator of the company who will be the sole representative of a wound up company. He can sue and be sued in his capacity as the Liquidator. So contact him and get your info. A dead companys assets are not public property and you will still be subjected to all the restrictions and legalities as would apply to an existing company!!! --- A student of Law from India...

  227. humbug by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    If I find property that someone else owns & then promply loses it, there's absolutely nothing the original owner can do, because he's not out of pockert. Remember he lost the property in the 1st place.

    Scenario:-

    MS Dickhead leaves briefcase on train that contains the source code for Windows XPSE2+++, some junkie rifles through briefcase looking for some scoring money, he throws the briefcase out of the window & it lands on the scrub by the side of the track. Now it's 3AM & the pub's closing & I'm pissed as nute, I take a shortcut across the railway track to get to the nightclub on the other side, & I find this briefcase. They won't let me into the nightclub because I'm pissed as a mute so I go home. The next day I rifle through the briefcase & realise what I find. I ring up MS dickhead who's number's on the side & ask for a reward. He says 'can't do that, I'll get into trouble', I say 'well bugger you I'm going to hand it to the cops'.

    Now if I happen to leave the briefcase on a bus while on the way to the copshop, have I committed a crime? What if I stop off at the pub for a beer & leave it there? Of course not.

    Mind you the smart thing to do would be to remove any ID from the briefcase & hand it in at some police station in some suburb on the otherside of town, or catch a train right into town & leave it at a big inner city police station. Then when filling out the form I'll say I found it by the railway track but can't think where as I was pissed as a mute.

    Odds on the briefcase would be filed away for the prerequesit 2 months, meaning I can go down & legally claim the briefcase & its contents as my own. BTW I rang him from a pay phone too, so there's no record of me contacting the MS dickhead either.

    1. Re:humbug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if you didn't drink so much, you wouldn't have these problems.

    2. Re:humbug by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your hypothetical is severely flawed.

      #1 It doesn't matter if you rang from a pay phone. MS is omnipresent and would be at your location before you hung up.

      #2 You didn't actually have a right to pick up the briefcase in the first place. Since your hypothetical mentions removal of identification, you knew the briefcase wasn't yours. This act was theft and yes you have committed a crime, to answer your rhetorical. Though unlikely, you cannot assume the briefcase was not left there on purpose. You stole the briefcase and its contents regardless of what those contents are, where or when you found or lost them, or if you ever turned it in.

      #3 You should always be careful crossing train tracks when drunk. You could lose an eye.

      #4 MS could actually record your conversation since most US states only require one party to actually give consent. The party doing the recording counts as one party. How do you think all those prank calls get made and aired legally? And lets not forget, you probably left prints on the case since you were pissed when you picked it up. Now all they have to do is call every police station in your area, find the briefcase, prove ownership, play the call back for the cops, take prints from the case, compare to known prints (yours are certainly on file as a known drunkard), knock on your door, and arrest your silly arse. GG

    3. Re:humbug by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

      But I handed it in to the cops anyway.

      Remember 'finding as theft' doesn't apply if one intends to hand lost property over to authorities. Unless you are saying everyone who finds something & hands it in to the cops automatically becomes a criminal.

      Its not illegal to hand in lost property to the police, the fact that one lost some ID that was with the lost property & handed the LP to a Police station on the other side of town doesn't change that fact.

      Also as long as one's intent was to hand it in to a police station, there's nothing illegal about losing it on the way. Afterall since when has losing stuff been a crime?

      & the fact remains, that after the prerequiset 2 months, any handed-in lost property becomes legally owned by the finder.

      Gez I'm baffled, a slashdotter claiming that handing in lost property to the cops (or attempting to do so) is a crime, what do I behold will be next?

  228. No!!!!! This is what you do!!!! LOOK HERE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First you UI it. Then you have to make a FTGA to the local legal adminestrator. Once this is approved, you open up a GATAG and wait for anyone dispute this (Very unlikely). Then you go to the trustee in charge of the bankruptcy and make your claim, file a PTAE and you are now the rightful owner of the code.

  229. From experience... you can do it legally by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    Have a lawyer check with the bankruptcy court. Typically (at least in the USA) this stuff takes forever. A software company without big assets isn't a high priority, so it drags on, and judges know there are all sorts of ways to make money with software and other IP.

    I have seen former employees go to a judge and get a license to the source for little or no money up front, so long as they have a plan the judge believes may produce income. Of course this plan includes paying a license fee to the court to help pay off the company debts.

    Be aware that you will probably be asked to turn over your copies, esp. if the court can't find copies. If nothing else, though, they may be willing to let you hold on to the main copies so long as you convince the court you will act responsibly.

    IANAL,, and I don't play one on /.

  230. Have you checked whether the company still exists? by fingusernames · · Score: 1

    How do you know Chilliware no longer exists? Most "failed" corporations stick around for years. They often have to by law, to provide a period for lawsuits and such. Chilliware, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware, like a great many corporations. See the following: http://kepler.ss.ca.gov/corpdata/ShowAllList?Query CorpNumber=C2194403 In California, it was only a "foreign" corporation registration, and shows the jurisdiction as Delaware. On Delaware's Secretary of State site: http://www.state.de.us/corp/index.htm it states that Delaware *charges* to look up corporation information. So, you must pay $30 for a written certificate, $10 to talk to somebody, or visit 401 Federal Street in Dover, Delaware to search for free. So spend the $10 and find out what actually happened to the company. The records will show who to contact if it does, and likely who to contact if it was dissolved. Larry

  231. Re: Ask a Lawyer by llywrch · · Score: 1

    > "I definitely wouldn't "ask Slashdot" when I've been caught with 40g of cocaine and a 12 year old prostitute in my car."

    > When or if? Is there something we should know?

    Did you miss that discussion on Slashdot? Dude, it was the best topic of the dot-bomb era. Unfortunately, the successful answer (``offer everyone involved stock in the IPO") isn't very useful anymore." :-/

    Geoff

    --
    I think I see a trend here. Maybe for them it really would be easier to muzzle the entire internet than to produce p
  232. Are you an innovator? by mulp · · Score: 1

    Technology has no intrinsic value. The code you have is technology. It appears at present time to be worthless.

    The question is are you an innovator and entrepreneur?

    If the answer is "yes" and more important, "I AM able to make things happen", then you will turn the technology into something of value, but the value will come from your efforts and not from the technology.

    Your profit from the venture will come from convincing the one who legally owns the technology that the deal you offer them is the best one they can expect, ie., the owners ability to innovate will result in less profit than you offer for the technology.

    If you aren't motivated by the profit to make it happen, then the profit requires too high an opportunity cost to you to bother with, or you lack the required skills and commitment to actually innovate.

  233. You don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's this simple: company goes belly up, all its assets are sold. That means their sources. Someone owns it, and unless you have a receipt, it isn't you.

  234. code should be in escrow by Maxwell · · Score: 1

    code should be in escrow at the lawyers office for the firm. Sale contracts state in the event of the firms failure, the code is delivered to the clients. clients may use it for internal use only, not distribute it, but may modify the code for their own use. This is how big software (finance, hr, etc) is sold. As for your average dot-bomb company...

    Ask a lawyer about found property laws in your state.

  235. Just Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you wait long enough (75 years?), it'll be public domain.

  236. You are assuming someone doesn't own it already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would think that when the company failed, all its assets including the software you have in your hot little hand was sold to someone.

    You might this interesting, http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/507.html.