You space nutters need to stop "dreaming" and start joining us here on Earth. The fact is YOU AREN'T GOING ANYWHERE. We evolved to live on Earth. We cannot live anywhere else for long periods of time. This is simple biology. The only place we can live is on Earth, or another Earth like planet. And we know, based on physics, that we cannot reach another Earth like planet. So fucking grow up and join the rest of us on Earth and try to improve Earth. Because you AREN'T going anywhere else, no matter how many billions of dollars you have.
Of course it is dependent on Earth. We evolved on Earth. We cannot live anywhere else long term, unless we find an Earth like planet. The idea of living on Mars for long periods of time is comical. You would be better off trying to build cities in the ocean. It would be much cheaper and successful.
He is correct. We will need more energy, and clearly there are only two ways to get it: colonize space, or cover the entire Earth with solar cells. There are no other alternatives. Clearly.
What year is this? No one has "wifi cards" in 2016. Are you using PCMCIA too? The point is that NO ONE needs a laptop with 4 hard drives and two wifi cards. Not even you.
I know, what was apple thinking when they didn't consider people who need 1TB ZFS pools? By the way: you don't need any "network cards" to turn a laptop into an access point, let alone 2. This isn't 1996.
No network is secure. The very concept of security is antithetical to what networks are about: sharing information. Any attempts to add security to networks is ultimately useless. Of course people will get mad to me for saying this, but this is proven over and over again: once information is on a network - it is shared. Due to the way networks are constructed there is no way to reliably exclude the sharing of the information, because there is no way to reliably validate connected endpoints. An endpoint can be a computer, a router or some guy plugging in a thumbdrive. Intelligence agencies need to stop using computer networks for sensitive information. The bigger the network, the more insecure it is. And the agencies have large networks.
Either way we are doomed. We won't be able to cope with multiple centimeters of water. It could be 1.4cm to 3.1cm. How could we handle that much water?
That extra 0.1cm per decade is the deadly tipping point. A 1.4 error range is really low too. That means the number might be 0.3cm to 3.1cm per decade. Either way, we are likely to see multiple centimeters more water in the ocean by 2027. If only we could stop multiple centimeters of water. But it isn't possible to do.
All businesses use it to make the call appear to come from the general office number. So if an employee calls someone they don't get the direct number to that employee, just the general business number.
"If youre near the crime scene - you COULD be involved"
Er, yes. If you are near the crime scene you COULD be. That is why police interview people, you know, that are near the crime scene. And yeah, this isn't entrapment. Another anti-cop asshole.
Slashdot Mirror
No, I would prefer they walk. Or ride a horse.
Everyone protesting the pipeline drove their car to the protest. Classic.
So it is deployed at an airport that serves millions of people. Yet there are no videos of it anywhere. How odd.
How about trying to fix Earth? Nah, too hard and not enough glory. Space nutters are narcissists.
Let me repeat: you cannot live in Space for long periods of time. That will never change.
Bezos will be long dead before we are able to construct reliable rockets that would be needed to achieve space based industry.
You space nutters need to stop "dreaming" and start joining us here on Earth. The fact is YOU AREN'T GOING ANYWHERE. We evolved to live on Earth. We cannot live anywhere else for long periods of time. This is simple biology. The only place we can live is on Earth, or another Earth like planet. And we know, based on physics, that we cannot reach another Earth like planet. So fucking grow up and join the rest of us on Earth and try to improve Earth. Because you AREN'T going anywhere else, no matter how many billions of dollars you have.
Of course it is dependent on Earth. We evolved on Earth. We cannot live anywhere else long term, unless we find an Earth like planet. The idea of living on Mars for long periods of time is comical. You would be better off trying to build cities in the ocean. It would be much cheaper and successful.
He is correct. We will need more energy, and clearly there are only two ways to get it: colonize space, or cover the entire Earth with solar cells. There are no other alternatives. Clearly.
What year is this? No one has "wifi cards" in 2016. Are you using PCMCIA too? The point is that NO ONE needs a laptop with 4 hard drives and two wifi cards. Not even you.
I know, what was apple thinking when they didn't consider people who need 1TB ZFS pools? By the way: you don't need any "network cards" to turn a laptop into an access point, let alone 2. This isn't 1996.
Yes, you definitely need a laptop with 4 hard drives and 2 wifi cards.
Tech companies are out of touch. Even $2,000 is too much for a laptop in 2017. Ridiculous.
No network is secure. The very concept of security is antithetical to what networks are about: sharing information. Any attempts to add security to networks is ultimately useless. Of course people will get mad to me for saying this, but this is proven over and over again: once information is on a network - it is shared. Due to the way networks are constructed there is no way to reliably exclude the sharing of the information, because there is no way to reliably validate connected endpoints. An endpoint can be a computer, a router or some guy plugging in a thumbdrive. Intelligence agencies need to stop using computer networks for sensitive information. The bigger the network, the more insecure it is. And the agencies have large networks.
Very disconcerting. How would we handle an extra 1.5 millimeters of water every year?
Oh no! 1.4cm per decade? It is worse than I thought! That is 1.5 millimeters a year.
Either way we are doomed. We won't be able to cope with multiple centimeters of water. It could be 1.4cm to 3.1cm. How could we handle that much water?
That extra 0.1cm per decade is the deadly tipping point. A 1.4 error range is really low too. That means the number might be 0.3cm to 3.1cm per decade. Either way, we are likely to see multiple centimeters more water in the ocean by 2027. If only we could stop multiple centimeters of water. But it isn't possible to do.
Sure it did. These social app companies are hitting hard times as the space gets consolidated by the major players.
There are no anti-mask laws in the United States.
Trump hates DC so much that he just opened a new hotel in Pennsylvania Avenue between the Capital Building and the White House. What a fuckwit.
All businesses use it to make the call appear to come from the general office number. So if an employee calls someone they don't get the direct number to that employee, just the general business number.
I would say about 90% of all landline calls are spam at this point.
You carry around a location-tracking device and you are worried about privacy? What fools.
"If youre near the crime scene - you COULD be involved"
Er, yes. If you are near the crime scene you COULD be. That is why police interview people, you know, that are near the crime scene. And yeah, this isn't entrapment. Another anti-cop asshole.