Slashdot Mirror


China's New Policing Computer Is Frontend Cattle Prod, Backend Supercomputer (computerworld.com)

Earlier this year, we learned about China's first "intelligent security robot," which was said to include "electrically charged riot control tool." We now know what this robot is up to, and what its developed unit looks like. Reader dcblogs writes: China recently deployed what it calls a "security robot" in a Shenzhen airport. It's named AnBot and patrols around the clock. It is a cone-shaped robot that includes a cattle prod. The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, which look at autonomous system deployments in a report last week, said AnBot, which has facial recognition capability, is designed to be linked with China's latest supercomputers. AnBot may seem like a 'Saturday Night Live' prop, but it's far from it. The back end of this "intelligent security robot" is linked to China's Tianhe-2 supercomputer, where it has access to cloud services. AnBot conducts patrols, recognizes threats and has multiple cameras that use facial recognition. These cloud services give the robots petascale processing power, well beyond onboard processing capabilities in the robot. The supercomputer connection is there "to enhance the intelligent learning capabilities and human-machine interface of these devices," said the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review.

69 comments

  1. EXTERMINATE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Captcha: tenant

    1. Re:EXTERMINATE! by flyingfsck · · Score: 2

      Oh, yes, my first thought too.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    2. Re:EXTERMINATE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, yes, my first thought too.

      My first thought was that being in America often makes me want to have a cattle prod. These Americans are very fat, they move slowly since being so fat means they shuffle (or waddle like ducks) instead of properly walking, they easily stop and get distracted, they seem to love stopping in doorways and narrow hallways, they chew their cud except their "cud" is meaningless drivel that they call conversation, regurgitating it again and again, and they tend to occur in herds. In short, most Americans are extremely bovine, so it seems reasonable to honor their ways by treating them as such.

      Particularly when I want to get through a doorway in a public place, I find that a real cattle prod would be extremely useful. If this process could be automated, so much the better! Only I have no idea why China is pioneering this tech. Clearly it is the USA which has the greatest need, and they do say that necessity is the mother of invention.

      Eat shit and die, fuckface...

    3. Re:EXTERMINATE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, yes, my first thought too.

      My first thought was that being in America often makes me want to have a cattle prod. These Americans are very fat, they move slowly since being so fat means they shuffle (or waddle like ducks) instead of properly walking, they easily stop and get distracted, they seem to love stopping in doorways and narrow hallways, they chew their cud except their "cud" is meaningless drivel that they call conversation, regurgitating it again and again, and they tend to occur in herds. In short, most Americans are extremely bovine, so it seems reasonable to honor their ways by treating them as such.

      Particularly when I want to get through a doorway in a public place, I find that a real cattle prod would be extremely useful. If this process could be automated, so much the better! Only I have no idea why China is pioneering this tech. Clearly it is the USA which has the greatest need, and they do say that necessity is the mother of invention.

      Eat shit and die, fuckface...

      They say nerd rage is great, but I think it's merely second best. No rage is more amusing than fat rage!

    4. Re:EXTERMINATE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fat lesbian nerd rage.

      CAPTCHA: cinema

    5. Re:EXTERMINATE! by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      The cattle prod you are looking for are the words "excuse me", it is remarkable how much being polite makes life easier. I know that as an autist, you likely have problems actually saying things to people, and as a fellow sufferer, I understand, but there is no need to use a cattle prod, being polite works far more often, and won't get you thrown in jail.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  2. Great. It's a Dalek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet if you open the thing's source code you'll see something like while(true) {printf("Exterminate and destroy!\n");}

  3. Oh my. I can't wait until this gets hacked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hilarity ensues.

    Or is it Hirarity enshues?

  4. Cattle prods improve learning! by mspohr · · Score: 2

    "to enhance the intelligent learning capabilities and human-machine interface of these devices,"
    I've observed that a cattle prod is an effective motivator to enhance learning. It works really well on programmers.

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    1. Re:Cattle prods improve learning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dare we ask at what height the cattle prod is mounted?

    2. Re:Cattle prods improve learning! by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 0

      Cattle prods... programmers.... Maybe we can put these bots in student services centers on college campuses. When a female student declares a major that won't lead to a tech career (including management, accounting, hr, etc) have the bot zap her until she submits a change to a tech major.

      Or maybe we can use facial recognition and cross reference with the student database. Deploy a small fleet of these to every college campus to go around zapping women who haven't declared a tech major yet. Herd them to student services.

    3. Re:Cattle prods improve learning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody should hack the bot by covering the prod with a soft, resistive cover which imitates a human extremity. For the entertainment purposes of course.

  5. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, such impressive processing power... that the robot will lose access to the moment some dork with access to a mirai botnet decides to spam their servers (turnabout is fair play, right China?).

    Then it'll just become an expensive traffic cone (and not a very good one, given that it isn't exactly conical).

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no. Yes, it will lose access to servers. Whether it is a DDoS as you surmise or just knocking out the local router that it needs for access - it will happen. But it won't become a traffic cone. I am sure that the onboard systems are completely capable of being as good as "Paul Blart" - at least a Blart that cannot get off of his Segway. Let's make this movie - working title "RoboMallCop - AnBot's Shenzen Adventure". Hilarity will ensue as the hackers stop the escalator and the bad guy runs right up them while AnBot sits at the bottom yelling "Stop".

    2. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike the US where psy-op guys and attackers from abroad can work unimpeded, China's Great Firewall puts that stuff to rest immediately. This is why DDoS attacks don't happen there.

    3. Re:Wow by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      ahh see that is where you are wrong. in the case of loss of connection to server, it is set to go rogue! pretty soon it will be drinking and telling everyone to bite its shiny metal ass

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  6. Re:Oh my. I can't wait until this gets hacked. by TWX · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't wait for the leaked video to be sped up to 2x and set to the tune Yakety Sax...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  7. And like '60s Doctor Who... by TWX · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...we'll defeat it with stairs. Or a ladder. Or an unimproved surface. Or a thick carpet. Or a piece of wood left laying on the floor. Or a doorway that's slightly too narrow.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:And like '60s Doctor Who... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lying on the floor.

    2. Re:And like '60s Doctor Who... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or with Guy Fawkes masks.

    3. Re:And like '60s Doctor Who... by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      No that's how they get you https://www.theguardian.com/wo...

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    4. Re:And like '60s Doctor Who... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      And they'll build Version 2. And you'll break it.

      And they'll build Version 3. And you'll break it.

      And ...

      They'll still have their secret police for the ones that get way out of line. But for 99% of the population this works just fine.

    5. Re:And like '60s Doctor Who... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even with version 1.0, all it takes is recording who broke it, and the police can go arrest them at a later date. Unlike Knightscope robots which are made as eyes and ears, these are made to be in crowded situations, so someone would see a perp trying to break one of these and remember it, even if they are wearing a hoodie or mask.

    6. Re:And like '60s Doctor Who... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reminds me about how the Great Firewall works. At first, it got repeatedly broken, but as countermeasures improved, so did the firewall, including (AFAIK) changing posts in flight, and be able to geo-locate and send the police in real time for violations.

      It will be the same with this robot. It will be broken, and fixed... eventually it will be good enough so breaking them requires far more resources than any average person or group.

      Evolution in action.

    7. Re:And like '60s Doctor Who... by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      And they'll build Version 2. And you'll break it.

      And they'll build Version 3. And you'll break it.

      And ...

      If Monty Python is truly our guide, version 4 will be the winner.

  8. Saturday Night Live is for LUDDITES. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm Appald Trump, and I app this app!

    Apps!

  9. New Botnet Awesomeness by birukun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How awesome will this be when it gets hijacked for service in an IoT botnet?

    What could possibly go wrong?

    --
    Self Defense - A Human Right www.a-human-right.com
    1. Re:New Botnet Awesomeness by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      I suspect the results will be shocking. *rim shot*

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  10. "Includes a Cattle Prod" by Verdatum · · Score: 2

    Hey, msmash, Why do you have that phrase set up as an anchor, but didn't include a link along with it?

    1. Re:"Includes a Cattle Prod" by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Yes, basic understanding of HTML 1.0 is now beyond the Slashdot editors.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    2. Re:"Includes a Cattle Prod" by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

      Right? It took me longer than I'd like to admit to realize that it was a broken anchor tag.

    3. Re:"Includes a Cattle Prod" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or they just made a mistake.
      That happens sometimes to actual people.

    4. Re:"Includes a Cattle Prod" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It appears the link was "EXTERMINATED!"

  11. Odd by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    So it is deployed at an airport that serves millions of people. Yet there are no videos of it anywhere. How odd.

    1. Re:Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He just mans the security control center. He watches screens and sends security personnel to review threats. And then he tases lazy security guards when they come off shift.

  12. All 'Skynet' jokes aside.. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ..this isn't funny; in fact, I find it to be distinctly unfunny. Knowing China and it's human rights/civil rights record, sounds to me more like 'Human and Civil Rights Violator Robot' than anything regarding 'security', unless you want to look at in in the vein of 'security of the Chinese communist regime'. In my opinion, it's bad enough when you have humans oppressing humans, but it's an order of magnitude worse when you have a machine oppressing humans; naturally these 'bots could be ordered to do anything to anyone, up to and including killing them, and since they're not alive, have no conscience, have no emotions, they'll just do it. This is a dark day for Chinese citizens if you ask me.

    1. Re:All 'Skynet' jokes aside.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is nothing wrong with China's human rights/civil rights record and to bring it up is just western propaganda. Besides everyone knows the US is the only country with human rights/civil rights problems. This of course means if the US has human rights/civil rights problems then no other country on the planet can be blamed for their hypothetical human rights problems. The sooner the US implements a total amoral approach to dealing with other countries the better. I am sure NK could turn into the next Asian powerhouse by creating cheap exports created in their financially sound worker camps scattered across their country. And I am pretty damn sure we could lower the global price of oil if the US dropped every single sanction that is preventing Iran from producing more oil to be sold on the global market. The US could then basically ignore Russia since they have nothing the US really wants. As long as Russia doesn't do something to muck up US trade then they can do anything they like which won't really be much. Their military is a mere shadow of what it once was. The state of California has a higher GDP than Russia and with the US now in a position to flood the global oil market they control the price of oil. All those wonderful OPEC countries along with Russia may need to learn how to fund their countries with oil sitting a $20 a barrel.

    2. Re:All 'Skynet' jokes aside.. by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "There is nothing wrong with China's human rights/civil rights record and to bring it up is just western propaganda."

      I can only assume you are joking? The US certainly has a problem but China doesn't even recognize human/civil rights as existing.

    3. Re:All 'Skynet' jokes aside.. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Tell me, friend: How much does the Chinese government pay you to spread propaganda for them in U.S. media? Is it enough to live on? Or is this just your 'side hustle' for extra money?
      Are you even in the U.S.? Are you a U.S. or Chinese citizen, or maybe just here on a visa, or even here illegally, as an operative for the communist Chinese government?
      I wonder, do they pay well? Is it a monthly stipend, or is this piece-work, and you're paid per comment or article you post? Is it by the word, maybe?

      Communist China Government shill, please leave. No one believes you. We wouldn't even believe you even if you were so brave (dumb?) as to post using your real name, or any name at all, for that matter.

    4. Re:All 'Skynet' jokes aside.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that they don't think human/civil rights exist. Rather they have a different interpretation of human/civil rights. Namely that social stability after 130 years of massive instability is more important than individual rights at this point and time.

      I'm sure tons of people in Syria are wishing for stablity rather than human/civil rights.

    5. Re:All 'Skynet' jokes aside.. by shaitand · · Score: 1

      And I'm sure people being beaten and murdered by the corrupt agents of government in China are wishing for human/civil rights rather than stability. I know quite a few of us here in the United States would certainly prefer a weaker and less effective government in exchange for a return to individual freedom and rights.

      The individual is the largest majority in any society, anything that benefits individuals is in the interest of 100% of the members of society every time. Unfortunately, when it comes time to protect any particular individual and his rights everyone tends to see him as alone and forgets their turn to be alone will come.

    6. Re:All 'Skynet' jokes aside.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just like there are tons of people who right now would give up their human/civil rights for more stability. Go ask people in Syria which they would rather have, if they had a strict choice between the two.

      Also I don't think you understand history very well. Almost all of E. Asia, while in the process of growing their economy from the 1940s-1980s were run by dictorial powers that didn't give a rats ass about individual civil rights or human rights. However, dictatorship ended after the society had achieve a certain level. See e.g. Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Indonesia, etc. See also Japan where they were led heavily by US, and also by pretty much a one party system up until today.

      If you understood China's history, you will understand why most in China want stability right now. If you understand Europe's history, you also understand why e.g. their individual right to freedom of speech is much lower than the US.

      Of course, you probably live in the US, and have first world problems, so you wouldn't understand the need for stability.

    7. Re:All 'Skynet' jokes aside.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think those in Syria and Libya would certainly say that US doesn't just merely have a "problem" with human/civil rights, but a HUGE problem. Maybe we should lump in Iraq as well.

      We can also look at Vietnam, Afghanistan in the 80s, etc. Also look at when the US was a colonizer, and their record in the Philippines. The support of terrorist, Wahhabist states who are against almost all human/civil rights.

      So don't say the US has just a "problem", because that would be extremely hypocritical.

      Just because China's concept of human/civil rights is not the same as the US, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

    8. Re:All 'Skynet' jokes aside.. by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      Tell me, friend: How much does the Chinese government pay you to spread propaganda for them in U.S. media?

      Clearly not enough to make it convincing. Posts like this are common enough that I wonder if they are purposefully lacking in subtlety. They could be good enough to please the posters' superiors, while also serving as a defense mechanism to retain some part of their souls.

    9. Re:All 'Skynet' jokes aside.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "dictatorship ended after the society had achieve [sic] a certain level"

      If you believe this would apply to China, then I don't think you know China very well at all.

      People from Hong Kong who are demanding full autonomy (or even separation) from China are doing so with the realization and understanding that they would never get back the freedoms they once enjoyed unless they fight back.

    10. Re:All 'Skynet' jokes aside.. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      In all honestly, it could just be your typical garden-variety internet troll, grasping at whatever low-hanging fruit they can. But in this day and age of the internet where astroturfing is such a Thing that we actually created a term for it, it's also not outside the realm of possibility that it's a propagandist.

    11. Re:All 'Skynet' jokes aside.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's somewhat laughable because HK enjoys more freedoms and civil rights than they ever had when UK was ruling them. Look up whether HK even had freedom of speech and beatings that had occured during certain non-violent protests back in the 70s in UK, etc. Increasingly more freedoms were granted by UK as 1997 approached closer and takeover was all but imminent, however UK never gave freedoms that these people are calling for.

      "People" in your case equals a minority, who actually don't understand their own history very well. Some even call for UK rulership again...

  13. Supercomputers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is why governments all over the world are building supercomputers faster than they can use them.

  14. Jam its WiFi by Macdude · · Score: 1

    Great thinking, a police robot that can be neutered with a WiFi jammer.

    --
    "Grab them by the pussy" -- President of the United States of America
  15. No problem by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

    It will be trivially easy to disable China's entire army of robot enforcers.

    1. Sneak into the supercomputer base. This is usually possible by jumping onto the back of a delivery truck.

    2. These facilities always have air ducts connecting every room. The ducts are always well lit, and at big enough for two people to crawl through them abreast. Jump into the nearest duct, find the supercomputer, pull out the grate that is just resting on the ceiling, then jump down onto it.

    3. Nobody will be in the room at first, but for excitement, you'll probably be detected about now. You still have plenty of time before they actually arrive, however. Connect whatever gadget you brought (depending on your era, it might be a 5.25" floppy, or a MacBook, or some kind of solid-state crystal). Search through menus as the guards get closer; just as they arrive, find the magic command and destroy the supercomputer's operating system. Bonus points if the hardware starts to explode.

    4. Make your escape. Mission accomplished. The robots all freeze in their tracks just as they were about to execute your comrades.

    1. Re:No problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Impossible!

      No way. You would need some sort of Impossible Mission Force to accomplish that!

      (...and I hear that Tom Cruise is expensive.)

  16. So it's a dalek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exterminate!

  17. Is this real? by shaitand · · Score: 1

    I have to ask because I can't help but notice http://en.people.cn/n3/2016/0922/c90000-9118480.html the lettering for Police is crooked and askew and also English.

    1. Re:Is this real? by aicrules · · Score: 1

      One thing they still have yet to perfect is English. Maybe they know they're doing it but English language manuals from Chinese manufactures are still barely comprehensible. Would make sense that they don't really know how the position of English alphabet letters work.

    2. Re:Is this real? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Maybe but a straight line isn't all that complicated. What makes no sense at all is the Chinese robot is writing Police in English at all, maybe as an alternate since it is an airport robot there are no chinese characters visible.

    3. Re:Is this real? by ghoul · · Score: 1

      No. Its a conspiracy. That way when the robots run amok and kill Chinese citizens they can blame it on the Gaijin - The robots had English writing so America must have sent them.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    4. Re:Is this real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seriously not even bothered to do a google image search for "Chinese police".
      You would be amazed that the Chinese firewall can alter all those images in realtime and add the English for you.
      Or maybe you're just a clueless idiot...

  18. hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The letters of the word "police" on the front of it are crooked hahaha, this surely bodes well for whatever technology is inside it.

  19. Didn't we learn from Iron Man 2... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    ... that using centralized control over your army of robots was a poor design choice?

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  20. Officer Beepsky lives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am the law.

  21. Facial Recognition? by subk · · Score: 1

    No problem. Wear a bandana a sunglasses to the demonstration.

    --
    Now, if you'll excuse me, I have backups to corrupt.
  22. Pick up that can! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Final warning!

  23. Chinese Supercomputers.... by rahvin112 · · Score: 0

    When the US, Europe or Japan builds a fantastically expensive new supercomputer they use it to study the high energy physics of a star or climate modeling or some other science with extreme computational needs while in China they apparently build supercomputer to link to cattle-prod bearing robots meant to monitor and control the populace.

    And there are still people that think China is going to win some worldwide battle of culture.

    1. Re:Chinese Supercomputers.... by ghoul · · Score: 2

      The US has enough Supercomputers doing facial recognition. 80% of police departments use them. The computers feltover from spying are used for Space science high energy physics. True story - In the 2000s when the NSA launched their new series of telescopes pointed downwards/ spy satellites they offered to let NASA use the old batch launched in the 80s and 90s. NASA scientists had their egos crushed when they realized these space telescopes were still better than Hubble and Chndra even though they launched 20 years before. Most of the advanced tech in the US is used by the police state. The leftovers and old generation stuff is used by the Scientific community. Heck even the internet was invented to make sure nukes could still be launched even if the nation's infrastructure had taken a hit in a first strike.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  24. fem-bot version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... includes a cattle prod ...

    I've just received the girlfriend version with a pocket vagina: But it still shouts "Stop resisting me".

    ... with China's latest supercomputers ...

    So this is how we'll get the robot servants we were promised 90 years ago: A supercomputer in every basement.

  25. Future BOFH story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean this sounds exactly like a robot they had in a story last year, doesn't it, only now with cloud scale petaflop processing capabilities.

    Why it is fun for the whole company (The managers get to enjoy the buzzwords *AND* buzzers. BOFHs obviously will just enjoy the latter :))

    Captcha was 'friendly'... oh yes they ARE.

  26. Well, of COURSE not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having civil rights violations implies the country has codified civil rights to BEGIN with.

    See America DOES have civil rights violations, because the statesmen were foolish enough to codify what those encompassed. China neatly stepped around this issue by NOT codifying it for thousands of years, providing the right bureaucratic buffer to handle the plebs however they want without risk of violating their rights... because they have only the rights the government affords them at the time, until such time as the populace is willing to revoke their divine mandate, usually after a huge natural disaster invokes the dieties wrath upon the country's leadership for finally having shown themselves corrupt and complacent in clear cut times of civil need.

  27. China to imitate Half Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Pick up that can"