Slashdot Mirror


User: 110010001000

110010001000's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
10,610
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 10,610

  1. Re:Video of the accident on First Satellite in Facebook's Plan For Global Internet Access Exploded With Falcon 9 (qz.com) · · Score: 3, Funny

    I only saw an explosion. The good news is that it looks like it happened during refueling. Once we switch to EmDrive technology we won't have to use propellant like that.

  2. I am sure SpaceX will use their high bandwidth sensor data and figure out the problem and fix it. It is just like software: you iterate and fix problems. They are still on track to go to Mars by 2018 I am certain. And then...beyond?

  3. Baloney on Microsoft Fixes Windows 10 Anniversary Update Freezing Issues (betanews.com) · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm typing this on my Windows 10 laptop and it is working fi

  4. I'm typing this on my 6 year old iPhone and the battery works just fi

  5. Re:Baloney on Confirmed: In an Unprecedented Move, Samsung Recalls All Galaxy Note 7 (yna.co.kr) · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sorry about that. The battery ran out. I'm recharging now and everything is back to nor

  6. I'm not sending mine back. I am using it right now to type this and it works just fi

  7. Re:No problem on Falcon 9 Explodes On Pad (npr.org) · · Score: 1

    No you aren't that old. You have fallen into the same trap that most tech people have: you assume progress is inevitable. Since we went to the Moon, it must be possible to go to Mars, and thus it must be possible to go to Andromeda. Because the computer industry has seen amazing growth, you think that applies to everything else. But real engineering is not like software. Despite the claims marketing charlatans at SpaceX make, you won't be going to Mars in in 2024. You won't be going in 2025, or 2225. Welcome to Earth. Sorry you don't like it here, but get used to it.

  8. Re:No problem on Falcon 9 Explodes On Pad (npr.org) · · Score: 1

    Sorry, reality can be harsh sometime. Welcome to Earth!

  9. Re:I'm not suprised at all... on Falcon 9 Explodes On Pad (npr.org) · · Score: 1

    If launching a rocket with a satellite into LEO is "bleeding edge of the physically impossible" then how difficult is it to go to Mars? We have been launching rockets for 80 years. Is going to Mars easier?

  10. Re:No problem on Falcon 9 Explodes On Pad (npr.org) · · Score: 1

    You aren't going anywhere, Bruce. This is what real hard engineering work looks like. It is full of smart people, who still occasionally fail. Wishing hard that you will go to Mars doesn't make it happen. This isn't computer software, which is easily correctible. This is the reality.

  11. Re:FaceTrace's Trace satellite destroyed on Falcon 9 Explodes On Pad (npr.org) · · Score: 0

    My mistake. I am sure you are a space nutter grounded in reality.

  12. Re:FaceTrace's Trace satellite destroyed on Falcon 9 Explodes On Pad (npr.org) · · Score: 5, Funny

    Either way, I am sure SpaceX will be headed to Mars in 2018 like they promised.

  13. Re:FaceTrace's Trace satellite destroyed on Falcon 9 Explodes On Pad (npr.org) · · Score: -1, Troll

    Eh, if it isn't "antimatter engines" with you space nutters it is "generational starships" and mystical perpetual motion machines. You all have one thing in common: you don't know what hard engineering work really looks like and how difficult it is to produce something that actually works.

  14. Re:FaceTrace's Trace satellite destroyed on Falcon 9 Explodes On Pad (npr.org) · · Score: 1, Troll

    No, rejoice! This is what HARD ENGINEERING WORK looks like. It is full of lots of very smart people working hard, and sometimes failing. It isn't you writing a fucking blog about antimatter engines.

  15. Re:No problem on Falcon 9 Explodes On Pad (npr.org) · · Score: 1

    But its OK. We have been working on rocket technology to LEO only for the last 80 years or so. I'm sure we will be building generational ships powered by EmDrives by the end of the year. Get your suit on, we are headed to the STARS!

  16. Re:FaceTrace's Trace satellite destroyed on Falcon 9 Explodes On Pad (npr.org) · · Score: -1

    Geez, you space nutters are something else. You think the concrete pad blew up?

  17. No problem on Falcon 9 Explodes On Pad (npr.org) · · Score: -1, Troll

    According to the Space Nutters, we will be flying to Andromeda with our EmDrive real soon. That is, once we get this new fangled rocket stuff worked out.

  18. Re:I might be interested... on HP Builds One Desktop PC Around a Speaker, Another Modular PC In Slices (arstechnica.com) · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is a discreet GPU a GPU that won't tell your wife if you watch porn?

  19. Re:hare brained "skepticism" on EmDrive: NASA Eagleworks' Peer-Reviwed Paper Is On Its Way (ibtimes.co.uk) · · Score: 1

    You are a crackpot if you believe in perpetual motion or ZPE. You keep saying we KNOW we need to "rebuild" physics. But we don't. You are simply a crackpot with an earthlink email address.

  20. Re: Prepare to be on EmDrive: NASA Eagleworks' Peer-Reviwed Paper Is On Its Way (ibtimes.co.uk) · · Score: 1

    You guys got me: you are right. The emDrive is harnessing dark energy. Get your spacesuits on! You will be going to Uranus real soon in your "generational spacecraft"!

  21. Re:40cm? on Tiny Particle Blows Hole In European Satellite's Solar Panel (go.com) · · Score: 1

    Wow...another Space Nutter shot down. The hits just keep on coming!

  22. So we are calling algorithms "AI" now? Cool.

  23. Re:Prepare to be on EmDrive: NASA Eagleworks' Peer-Reviwed Paper Is On Its Way (ibtimes.co.uk) · · Score: 1

    You cannot "relax the bounds" of the Laws of Physics. Christ you Space Nutters really are something else. You don't even realize how stupid you sound.

  24. Re:Lighten up on EmDrive: NASA Eagleworks' Peer-Reviwed Paper Is On Its Way (ibtimes.co.uk) · · Score: 1

    "However, we can't know what those are with precision and accuracy."

    Yes. Yes we can, because we have the Math that backs up those Laws. This is why people like you are stupid: you don't even understand basic science and how it works.

  25. Re:hare brained "skepticism" on EmDrive: NASA Eagleworks' Peer-Reviwed Paper Is On Its Way (ibtimes.co.uk) · · Score: 1

    100% correct. We also don't have time to track down every crackpot with a perpetual motion scam.