I wouldn't suggest you elect people like the wife of a former President who is grooming her child to also become President in the future. I wouldn't suggest you elect people like another Bush or Kennedy. We don't need powerful families who keep getting elected based on their name and biological relationships. I also wouldn't elect people based on their "business success". People like Carly are terrible: they may fortunes by ruining entire companies and peoples lives. She isn't a winner, she is a loser.
Yes. You see this too in the US. Look at the Presidential field: many business leaders vying to get their way in. And even if they aren't trying to get elected, people like Buffett have access to the decisions made at the highest level. He is "consulted" every time there is a bailout issue.
It started with the transition of computers from PC's to walled gardens and network access through monopolies who don't honor network neutrality. Eventually you will need an "approved device" to talk to the Internet and you will need to access your data through external "cloud" services. You already see this with the success of iOS devices and the various "app stores".
The control of the State over information is more important than everything else: including profit. State Power is more important than profit. If you can't control the State you have no Power. If you have Power you have everything (power is the true wealth).
...before the US and EU follows suit. You will only be allowed on the Internet with approved devices and approved content. You don't think this is possible? Think of the children and the terrorists! Why do you hate children and don't you want to protect your Freedoms?
100% correct. If you look more closely these "researchers" are actually Palo Alto Networks who will sell you a device that "protects" you from this. If you look at the threat it screams scam: there are.ru URLs where you need to enter your credit card information into all over the place. I doubt anyone would be dumb enough to fall for this.
There are lots of other projects to work on that will give you more success than static code analyzers. The market is saturated with those, and many of them are free.
Well that didn't stop the shootings in Paris did it? The reason access to the phone is important is it might contain the motive. Gee I wonder what the motive might be?
Slashdot Mirror
Oh really? What hypothesis was the Research group at Yahoo formulating? How to avoid doing real work?
Productize=make things useful enough to actually being used. Example: Linux vs. Hurd.
Acoustic pollution from windmills? But RC aircraft and aircraft are OK? You might be nuts.
Research divisions are useless anyway. Everyone has tons of "innovative" ideas. The point is to productize them, or at least make them useful.
But it is a simple matter of calories in/out. The study even says so. They looked at the calorific value left in the faeces.
Do they exist in the Cloud? Are they webscale?
Someone seriously studied this? Does the phrase "I'm just following orders" not exist to these people?
So maybe you should vote for me. I'm the only one with good ideas.
Yes. For now. Eventually you will need to use an approved device. Why do you hate Freedoms?
I wouldn't suggest you elect people like the wife of a former President who is grooming her child to also become President in the future. I wouldn't suggest you elect people like another Bush or Kennedy. We don't need powerful families who keep getting elected based on their name and biological relationships. I also wouldn't elect people based on their "business success". People like Carly are terrible: they may fortunes by ruining entire companies and peoples lives. She isn't a winner, she is a loser.
Slashdot? Who is talking about Slashdot? You dunce.
Yes. You see this too in the US. Look at the Presidential field: many business leaders vying to get their way in. And even if they aren't trying to get elected, people like Buffett have access to the decisions made at the highest level. He is "consulted" every time there is a bailout issue.
It started with the transition of computers from PC's to walled gardens and network access through monopolies who don't honor network neutrality. Eventually you will need an "approved device" to talk to the Internet and you will need to access your data through external "cloud" services. You already see this with the success of iOS devices and the various "app stores".
The control of the State over information is more important than everything else: including profit. State Power is more important than profit. If you can't control the State you have no Power. If you have Power you have everything (power is the true wealth).
...before the US and EU follows suit. You will only be allowed on the Internet with approved devices and approved content. You don't think this is possible? Think of the children and the terrorists! Why do you hate children and don't you want to protect your Freedoms?
Timothy...what the F? What is (TM) and the "a" all over? Unreadable! The new owners need to do something about this.
100% correct. If you look more closely these "researchers" are actually Palo Alto Networks who will sell you a device that "protects" you from this. If you look at the threat it screams scam: there are .ru URLs where you need to enter your credit card information into all over the place. I doubt anyone would be dumb enough to fall for this.
There are lots of other projects to work on that will give you more success than static code analyzers. The market is saturated with those, and many of them are free.
How many static code analyzers do we need? It must be really boring in Russia.
If you are depending on an iPhone for your life then you might want to reconsider your life.
Hilarious: the web page says "Thank you for choosing Snom! German engineered!"
I'm pretty sure that VW proved that "German Engineering" didn't mean much.
Well that didn't stop the shootings in Paris did it? The reason access to the phone is important is it might contain the motive. Gee I wonder what the motive might be?
They must be pretty good if they attend Defcon in Las Vegas!
Oh great. Now what am I going to complain about?
Great. Next step: ban Ethan Siegel submissions that point to a known website that serves ads with malware in them.