Slashdot Mirror


User: svnt

svnt's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
157
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 157

  1. "and other media" on Congressman Wants Health Warnings On Video Games · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.apa.org/releases/resolutiononvideoviolence.pdf

    I especially like the part where R-rated movies were included in the bill based on the conclusions of similar dubious studies. Oh, wait, they weren't. Wonder why that is?

  2. Re:Who says it'll have custom apps? on Here Comes iPhone Nano, But Not In the US · · Score: 1

    More importantly, who says you can't get a physically smaller LCD screen than the iPhone with the same number of pixels.

    There are several phones out now (HTC, OpenMoko) with a 2.8" 640x480 LCD. There is no reason an iPhone Nano couldn't sport a 480x320 2.2" display and have zero resolution-based issues.

  3. Cheat Neutral on The Inexact Science of Carbon Neutrality · · Score: 4, Funny

    My favorite commentary on carbon offsetting is Cheat Neutral

    Brilliant way to make a statement. Yes, it is real. No, the creators don't keep the money. No, I'm not involved with the company/website.

  4. Re:TV in Los Angeles on Obama Recommends Delay In Digital TV Switch · · Score: 1

    You are so wrong about loss of jobs in TV and advertising. It is the beer industry that will suffer from this transition.

    Seriously, what other money do you expect them to pool to buy a converter box when the whole system goes off-line?

    I also predict that Spanish-language newspapers will see a large sales spike until everyone figures out why their TV no longer works.

  5. Re:The American Public Will Never Learn on Obama Recommends Delay In Digital TV Switch · · Score: 1

    Personally I'm glad the program is out of money. I would have ordered more coupons and let them expire had it been legal.

    I have nothing against TV. I do have something against welfare for TV-viewers who can't or won't spend $40 for something to allow them to keep watching.

  6. Re:They've had years on Obama Recommends Delay In Digital TV Switch · · Score: 1

    I ordered my allocation and promptly shredded them. I know they go back into the pool at some point but I'm hoping that time period will be long enough that the transition will have happened and the government won't have to reissue them.

    If you can't afford a $40 converter box, turn the TV off and get a job.

  7. Re:And so it begins on Obama Picks RIAA's Favorite Lawyer For Top DoJ Post · · Score: 1

    I am sorry to have added to your overdone rebuke. I will now fix my viewing threshold.

  8. Re:And so it begins on Obama Picks RIAA's Favorite Lawyer For Top DoJ Post · · Score: 1

    as the first chink in the army

    Ooh. You should take more care to get that metaphor right. When "armor" is replaced by a word that encompasses "group of people," chink assumes a definition I'm sure you didn't intend.

  9. Re:If you want to see a real Steve Jobs Keynote... on Jobs Not Giving This Year's Macworld Keynote · · Score: 1

    anus stretched to almost athletic proportions

    Yeah I'm pretty sure O.J. holds the Biggest Athletic Asshole award now.

  10. Re:All firms are anti-union on Tech Firms Oppose Union Organizing · · Score: 1

    Check the statistics on charitable giving to see what I mean.

    Let's be honest about this breakdown. The real divide is between secular and non-secular haves (vs. have-nots), they just happen to split fairly nicely along party lines.

    Giving to your local church in my view is not the same as giving to a charity doing important work in the real world. Some churches do valuable things with their donations. Many just use them to grow bigger churches and bother me by sending their mothers around to my door on Saturday mornings to discuss why I feel that the self-referencing nature of the Bible makes it a poor basis for a belief system.

    From this article: http://philanthropy.com/free/articles/v19/i04/04001101.htm "In 2000, religious people gave three and a half times as much as secular people."

    When 10% of your paycheck is "donated" to secure your status in the afterlife, is it still charity?

  11. Re:The UAW - a poster child! on Tech Firms Oppose Union Organizing · · Score: 1

    How about the fact that for every new car that GM sells they are covering $2000 in "legacy costs" thanks to UAW retirees? That doesn't go away with the new wage structure implemented this year that finally drops wages to a more reasonable level.

    See: http://www.popularmechanics.com/automotive/new_cars/4292379.html under #3

  12. Re:UAW on Tech Firms Oppose Union Organizing · · Score: 1

    You're turkeys voting for christmas.

    Dude, if you want Americans to understand you the saying is "turkeys voting for Thanksgiving." Christmas is when we forgo eating to buy crap no one wants.

  13. Re:Package Size on Broadcom Crams 802.11n, Bluetooth, and FM Onto a Single Chip · · Score: 1

    One usually gets better die-level integration than board level

    Thanks Captain Obvious. Usually? Please provide a single concrete example of better board-level integration.

    the fact that you could address and power just one chip rather than three would be a winning advantage on its own.

    Maybe, but most likely it will only save a couple of chip selects. Also, don't you just love it when your WiFi drops out when your FM radio is damaged?

  14. Re:Misleading summary on Unix Dict/grep Solves Left-Side-of-Keyboard Puzzle · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is such an obvious blog spam by this guy that it is painful.

    Both blog entries (one completely redundant to mask the referrals), are authored by "Moe Zilla" (painfully lame pseudonym, btw) whose "ultimate goal is to earn money online while writing about whatever I want," and whose writing style has the exact same defects as those in the summary.

    Give up dude, your high school English teach was right: you suck.

  15. Re:Where oh where? on Spider Missing After Trip To Space Station · · Score: 1

    I hate people who post wishing they had mod points, but I wish I had mod points. Funniest comment in a while.

  16. Re:yes, but here it's funnier on When Agile Projects Go Bad · · Score: 1

    Ah, thanks. I thought I knew fully what esoteric meant, and it didn't really make sense in this context.

    Thanks to Wikipedia apparently I can blame that on my "Western, English-speaking society" where "the term 'esotericism' is not necessarily used in the sense of mystical knowledge or practice."

  17. Re:Reality check... on Researchers Getting the Lead Out of Electronics · · Score: 1

    Lead: Found in damn near every kind of mining ore. Very common.

    The difference is that if my toddler becomes developmentally disabled from licking ore, there is no manufacturer to sue.

    Well, I could try, but I've heard he's got a Hell of a legal team.

  18. Way Too Late on Researchers Getting the Lead Out of Electronics · · Score: 2, Informative

    They may pick up some stragglers that are totally dependent on PZT, but in European consumer electronics, components containing significant PZT have been practically useless since 2006. Europe is not what I would call a small market - as a result, components everywhere are designed to meet the same requirements, meaning these components have suffered from declining demand and/or been removed from company plans.

    "Products that use the new compound could hit the market in about five years, according to the university, after large-scale testing takes place, industry awareness and demand happens, and a method for mass production is created."

    Given that RoHS has already had a staggering impact on the electronics industry, I don't see "maybe 2013, if people figure out that they want this material, and if we can actually mass-produce it" as too reassuring. I'm sure not designing anything in the hopes that a PZT replacement will hit the market sometime next decade.

    Maybe if you're in ultrasonics this is big news?

  19. Re:yes, but here it's funnier on When Agile Projects Go Bad · · Score: 1

    And if you look, see there's no beer, and still think there's a beer in the fridge, that's esotheric.

    Honest question:
    Does that joke originate the word esotheric?

    m-w.com has no entry. Google suggests witchcraft, but there are few links of any value. The sentence (I guess) suggests blind & willfully ignorant faith, which does not quite specify witchcraft. Does the word have a history?

  20. Re:College is not important on Beating the College Bubble · · Score: 1

    Who is the smartest guy around? The guy that goes to university and studies something like philosophy or psychology, or the one who gets a professional welding formation and earns 75k+ per year?

    Think about it...

    That reminds me of the time when I won the lottery and got accepted into Mensa.

    Money is not intelligence, idiot.

  21. The Rover is just "collecting science" on NASA's Hubble Space Telescope Is Back In Business · · Score: 3, Funny

    I knew those NASA guys were sandbagging.

    Claiming to be carrying out "experiments" with "hypotheses," ha!

  22. Re:Wrong picture... taken from here on Halloween Pumpkin Carving With CNC Robotics · · Score: 1

    Offensive? To who, pumpkin artists everywhere?

    What percentage of the population do you think that is? If we can't afford to offend pumpkin artists we have seriously gone off the deep end.

  23. Re:nice pumpkin, but on Halloween Pumpkin Carving With CNC Robotics · · Score: 1

    Whoa whoa whoa I have to stop you.

    "a demonic face"

    A?! demonic face?!

    GTFO. Seriously. Try again tomorrow.

  24. Re:I predict... on Ted "A Series of Tubes" Stevens Found Guilty · · Score: 1

    Taking this seriously, as it probably will happen, what are the odds that Stevens' "gamble" was no gamble at all?

    If the trial dragged on, he would have been convicted after the Bush "pardon window." He would quite likely be deceased by the time the next sympathetic president left office.

  25. Re:I predict... on Ted "A Series of Tubes" Stevens Found Guilty · · Score: 1

    And after that, a blowjob!

    Er, wait, sorry, which president is it again?