The only point you made is showing everyone you take words on their face value, and don't bother looking in to who said them. Yes, they called themselves socialist, but in deed they were far from it. You also seem to be confusing other words you use, such as "fascist". You are really embarrassing yourself with every post. You sound scared and little.
It's wonderfully illuminating that you confuse fetuses and babies, then entirely forget the right-wing-driven wars which killed countless of actual babies and children. If you are capable of those mental gymnastics, it tends to make your position look based on emotion and not logic. Also, every party in the US is right-wing, so you really don't have any kind of point, apart from showing the world how you prefer emotion to fact, that is. You made that point really well.
So much opinion, so little fact. It doesn't help you sound rational when you have made comments in the past about women not being suitable for being scientists and other baseless, stereotypical assertions. You can bash on socialist hellholes, but they provide a greater quality of life than you have, with better healthcare and social security, and for less money than you pay for your crumbling infrastructure and hate-infested politics (of which you appear to be a rather large fan).
It's OK, though. Dinosaurs like you will be dead soon, and the world can try to shake off the scared, feeble, desperate ideas the likes of you vomit forth, and make some real progress towards a decent society.
You posted a link to a men's rights blog, and expect to be taken seriously. You sound like an angry old man scared his bullshit will be called out by people who know better than him. You probably know you are wrong, but need to keep thinking that nonsense else you'll have to re-evaluate your entire world view, which you are too mentally incompetent or lazy to achieve.
You say that, but it's just not true. All you managed to achieve with that post is tell everyone you are ignorant, proud of it, and want to stay that way. You are a credit to your country.
If no justification is required, why have you made 20 posts attempting to justify it? It's OK - just admit it makes you feel all manly when you drive around. That's fine.
"How many trips did you say would be a wash? Well, more than that, then!". You can't win when accepting you are right means the other person has to publicly admit their penis extension wasn't a sound choice. Also remember FlyHelicopters seems to be some sort of anti-vaxxer, which might shed some light on how an otherwise lucid, intelligent person seems to have their head screwed on backwards when emotion comes into play.
As opposed to pretending we have fuel forever, and expecting some miracle to happen when it does get ridiculously expensive and stays that way, that the economy doesn't simply implode. You putting green in quotes only makes you look like a partisan muppet, more interested in taking pot-shots at "them" than actually attempting to solve the problem at hand. Wonder why the US isn't as great as it used to be? All this wasted energy by muppets such as yourself. If you spent that energy on fixing things instead of attempting to paint those you perceive as being on the other team as some kind of irrational twats, the world would be in better shape. But no - that requires actually realizing your childish behavior is just that and putting it behind you. Fat chance, right?
So evil you can't enunciate or demonstrate how, and instead resort to logical fallacies and confusing your opinion with fact. Bravo, sir! You're sure making Texas look rational.
But your numbers have repeatedly been shown to be inaccurate, or describing something different to what you think... Again, really - why should anyone discuss this with someone who gets so easily confused and who is frequently mistaken or flat-out wrong?
So you are doing "hefty research", yet are making mistakes that anyone having performed such research would not make. So either your research approach is fatally flawed, you are lying, or you have forgotten the research you made. Pick one:)
Blinded by your hubris once more. Tragic. Maybe you should add "Pseudodoctor" and "Senior Conspiracy Analyst" to your job title. This is bordering on the pathetic.
Your whole "profit" argument is nonsense, as we can see in more developed countries where charging ludicrous amounts for vaccines doesn't happen. You sound like a conspiracy nut! Of course those companies have issues, but the research performed outside those companies, show their vaccines are safe and effective. It really would help you to learn about this instead of spouting someone else's opinion - with every post you make you make yourself sound more and more like APK. It's embarrassing, as I know you are intelligent.
So you openly admit you might have visited countless mobile sites without even knowing, as you only notice the bad ones as being mobile sites. Your argument is quickly unravelling with every post...
And this change can serve to force those sites to get their acts together, as Google has frequently penalised sites for broken user experiences. If a company's mobile site is being returned as their search result, they will (if their marketing department knows what they're doing) do anything they can to get it higher. Mobile sites are designed with the other differences in the platforms in mind. Clearly it's more than just screen resolution - touch-compatible inputs & UI, reduced data usage by more use of AJAX, high-DPI compliant, and so on. Picking one difference and pretending it's the only isn't helping you differentiate from the usual waft of people scared of change:)
Well, actually, their ad revenue is a secondary concern to their search engine. If their search engine doesn't work, people won't use it, and so they can't make money from AdWords and so forth. The way they can maximise their profits is to get as many people using a service, and the easiest way to do that is to offer a good service. It seems many old farts on this site aren't particularly happy with anything changing, so when Google changes anything, they get all cranky and call for the nurse.
Which matters naught, as they can still have different, contradictory goals. One department might be hardening the US's equipment, while another seeks to infiltrate similar equipment (as other countries use it). Not too difficult, is it?
The only way your question has any merit is if everyone, the world over, can only work on one problem at a time. Either you think that is true, or you should probably spend more time thinking before typing:)
That was true well over 15 years ago, but now Slashdot is harboring a bunch of angry old bastards like yourself who think trying to make a fair and just society is somehow a bad thing.
Slashdot Mirror
The only point you made is showing everyone you take words on their face value, and don't bother looking in to who said them. Yes, they called themselves socialist, but in deed they were far from it. You also seem to be confusing other words you use, such as "fascist". You are really embarrassing yourself with every post. You sound scared and little.
It's wonderfully illuminating that you confuse fetuses and babies, then entirely forget the right-wing-driven wars which killed countless of actual babies and children. If you are capable of those mental gymnastics, it tends to make your position look based on emotion and not logic. Also, every party in the US is right-wing, so you really don't have any kind of point, apart from showing the world how you prefer emotion to fact, that is. You made that point really well.
So much opinion, so little fact. It doesn't help you sound rational when you have made comments in the past about women not being suitable for being scientists and other baseless, stereotypical assertions. You can bash on socialist hellholes, but they provide a greater quality of life than you have, with better healthcare and social security, and for less money than you pay for your crumbling infrastructure and hate-infested politics (of which you appear to be a rather large fan).
It's OK, though. Dinosaurs like you will be dead soon, and the world can try to shake off the scared, feeble, desperate ideas the likes of you vomit forth, and make some real progress towards a decent society.
You posted a link to a men's rights blog, and expect to be taken seriously. You sound like an angry old man scared his bullshit will be called out by people who know better than him. You probably know you are wrong, but need to keep thinking that nonsense else you'll have to re-evaluate your entire world view, which you are too mentally incompetent or lazy to achieve.
You say that, but it's just not true. All you managed to achieve with that post is tell everyone you are ignorant, proud of it, and want to stay that way. You are a credit to your country.
If no justification is required, why have you made 20 posts attempting to justify it? It's OK - just admit it makes you feel all manly when you drive around. That's fine.
"How many trips did you say would be a wash? Well, more than that, then!". You can't win when accepting you are right means the other person has to publicly admit their penis extension wasn't a sound choice. Also remember FlyHelicopters seems to be some sort of anti-vaxxer, which might shed some light on how an otherwise lucid, intelligent person seems to have their head screwed on backwards when emotion comes into play.
As opposed to pretending we have fuel forever, and expecting some miracle to happen when it does get ridiculously expensive and stays that way, that the economy doesn't simply implode. You putting green in quotes only makes you look like a partisan muppet, more interested in taking pot-shots at "them" than actually attempting to solve the problem at hand. Wonder why the US isn't as great as it used to be? All this wasted energy by muppets such as yourself. If you spent that energy on fixing things instead of attempting to paint those you perceive as being on the other team as some kind of irrational twats, the world would be in better shape. But no - that requires actually realizing your childish behavior is just that and putting it behind you. Fat chance, right?
So evil you can't enunciate or demonstrate how, and instead resort to logical fallacies and confusing your opinion with fact. Bravo, sir! You're sure making Texas look rational.
You probably don't know, but you just embarrassed yourself. Massively.
But your numbers have repeatedly been shown to be inaccurate, or describing something different to what you think... Again, really - why should anyone discuss this with someone who gets so easily confused and who is frequently mistaken or flat-out wrong?
So your awesome researching ability doesn't include reading the pages you cite. Please tell us again why should anyone pay attention to you?
So you are doing "hefty research", yet are making mistakes that anyone having performed such research would not make. So either your research approach is fatally flawed, you are lying, or you have forgotten the research you made. Pick one :)
The silence is deafening. S. Petry, Senior Nonsense-Peddler, where are you? :)
Blinded by your hubris once more. Tragic. Maybe you should add "Pseudodoctor" and "Senior Conspiracy Analyst" to your job title. This is bordering on the pathetic.
Your whole "profit" argument is nonsense, as we can see in more developed countries where charging ludicrous amounts for vaccines doesn't happen. You sound like a conspiracy nut! Of course those companies have issues, but the research performed outside those companies, show their vaccines are safe and effective. It really would help you to learn about this instead of spouting someone else's opinion - with every post you make you make yourself sound more and more like APK. It's embarrassing, as I know you are intelligent.
You seem to be confusing your opinion and fact. Again.
So you openly admit you might have visited countless mobile sites without even knowing, as you only notice the bad ones as being mobile sites. Your argument is quickly unravelling with every post...
And this change can serve to force those sites to get their acts together, as Google has frequently penalised sites for broken user experiences. If a company's mobile site is being returned as their search result, they will (if their marketing department knows what they're doing) do anything they can to get it higher. Mobile sites are designed with the other differences in the platforms in mind. Clearly it's more than just screen resolution - touch-compatible inputs & UI, reduced data usage by more use of AJAX, high-DPI compliant, and so on. Picking one difference and pretending it's the only isn't helping you differentiate from the usual waft of people scared of change :)
Well, actually, their ad revenue is a secondary concern to their search engine. If their search engine doesn't work, people won't use it, and so they can't make money from AdWords and so forth. The way they can maximise their profits is to get as many people using a service, and the easiest way to do that is to offer a good service. It seems many old farts on this site aren't particularly happy with anything changing, so when Google changes anything, they get all cranky and call for the nurse.
Maybe, just maybe - and this is a guess - they know what they're doing? What's more likely?
Which matters naught, as they can still have different, contradictory goals. One department might be hardening the US's equipment, while another seeks to infiltrate similar equipment (as other countries use it). Not too difficult, is it?
The only way your question has any merit is if everyone, the world over, can only work on one problem at a time. Either you think that is true, or you should probably spend more time thinking before typing :)
You can ask these questions, or you can learn the answer. I guess if you're happy being ignorant yet sounding like you care, you're doing it right.
That was true well over 15 years ago, but now Slashdot is harboring a bunch of angry old bastards like yourself who think trying to make a fair and just society is somehow a bad thing.