CO2 and temperature are not the only two players in the game. There are a whole host of different factors which cause the Earth's temperature to change. Just saying what you did and expecting it to carry any weight and not be just a testimony to how woefully ignorant you are of this situation is incredible. You should read what "forcing" and "sensitivity" mean, and what forces exist, and how they and sensitivity can vary over time. Then read what you wrote. Then feel embarrassed. Very, very embarrassed.
So you know everything the Google cars can do, and more importantly what they can't. Gotcha. You should go tell Google, as apparently all they had to do was to ask you, and they'd know what they should be doing. Or you're wrong. I wonder which is more plausible...
Nah, I think your mistake proves entirely that some drivers (including yourself) are woefully ill-informed, yet assume they are the very paradigm of safe driving. You got the recommended spacing between cars off by 100%. Brilliant. You're a credit to the other side.
You should look at the Karlsruhe system. Local and regional trains that use the same tram tracks through the town. Jump on the tram that goes 100m near your house, and get off in a city 50km away. Or 100km. Or change at the train station and travel to another country. Not all trains are as ridiculous as the US's.
How about Google get some of those guys in to teach the system. Then we have the best of both worlds - advanced driving techniques with the fastest reaction times available.
Re: It was already a dangerous site to visit ...
on
PHP.net Compromised
·
· Score: 1
Just have the lines owned by the local authority, and then provide access to the ISPs. If an ISP sucks, people go somewhere else. If all the ISPs suck, then I have no idea.
You use JavaScript. It has libraries to download/decompress stuff, and can process things really well. Just because you don't know how to do it doesn't make it exotically strange and esoteric.
Oh noes! The poow widdle man can't buy his assault rifle for "self protection". Jeez. Grow up already. You're like a tragic stuck record bleating on about some point the adults just don't (quite rightly) care about.
This is no big issue. Simply make owning a firearm a criminal offence, using one in a crime a massive offence, and they won't be used anywhere near as much. Then have the police remove all the guns they come across, and the number of guns decreases massively. When a criminal doesn't feel the need to have a gun in order to commit a crime (as their opponents won't be armed), they no longer use them. Crime will still exist, but far fewer people will die. Of course this won't work in the face of the US's bizarre gun culture, so I guess the point's moot. Complaining about geography or population size has nothing to do with the problems.
If we are playing that game, then the US also killed countless people when it destroyed the Indians. Or we could grow up and actually stick to the present day, with the present incarnations of institutions which might have shared a common name or two in history.
Nonsense. Other countries spend less money on comparable healthcare. Many medical treatments were pioneered in other countries, and have since come to the US. Spouting this nonsense is only hurting you and your country. Why do you do it? Because it's easier than admitting your country has serious flaws? That makes more sense than an obviously-intelligent person being so woefully (and wilfully) ignorant.
The government doesn't decide anything. You'd go to the hospital, and get treatment as soon as possible. Or you can spend $50 a month and get top-notch private treatment exactly as you want it (and for your family, too), when you want it. The private option is still there (and for less than you pay in the US), but most people don't need to take advantage of it as the public option is perfectly adequate. You are arguing against spectres which don't exist. It's sad.
The taxes are not "huge", as the overheads for care are far lower. No hundreds-of-thousands of paper pushers in the middle, just government-run hospitals doling out government-paid-for treatments and medicine. The outcomes are definitely comparable. I have no idea why you are arguing against it. You're the one wanting to pay big corporations for your health care, yet you rail against taking them out of the picture entirely? Your logic is, *ahem*, "broken".
Well, technically speaking, the price difference to him between having the injury and not having the injury is 0. That's kind of the same as "not paying" in any meaningful sense.
No, one must simply not conflate the religion of the perpetrators with the act, as if they are one and the same thing. You know - just be an adult about it. Again here you go showing that your not unsubstantial intellect has become perverted somewhere in your history, leaning you to tilt at perceived injustices, which serves only to highlight your failings as an honest intellectual, and your rather large axe which you seem to love to grind. Strange.
Slashdot Mirror
CO2 and temperature are not the only two players in the game. There are a whole host of different factors which cause the Earth's temperature to change. Just saying what you did and expecting it to carry any weight and not be just a testimony to how woefully ignorant you are of this situation is incredible. You should read what "forcing" and "sensitivity" mean, and what forces exist, and how they and sensitivity can vary over time. Then read what you wrote. Then feel embarrassed. Very, very embarrassed.
So you know everything the Google cars can do, and more importantly what they can't. Gotcha. You should go tell Google, as apparently all they had to do was to ask you, and they'd know what they should be doing. Or you're wrong. I wonder which is more plausible...
Nah, I think your mistake proves entirely that some drivers (including yourself) are woefully ill-informed, yet assume they are the very paradigm of safe driving. You got the recommended spacing between cars off by 100%. Brilliant. You're a credit to the other side.
You should look at the Karlsruhe system. Local and regional trains that use the same tram tracks through the town. Jump on the tram that goes 100m near your house, and get off in a city 50km away. Or 100km. Or change at the train station and travel to another country. Not all trains are as ridiculous as the US's.
How about Google get some of those guys in to teach the system. Then we have the best of both worlds - advanced driving techniques with the fastest reaction times available.
So PHP is bad for allowing it to run code?? wut?
Are you seriously equating the complexity and cost of the last mile with a cell tower?
Because without those customers who want a better service, those 1/1 people would be getting precisely 0/0.
So spiteful, pointless murder is perfectly OK to you. Good to know.
Just have the lines owned by the local authority, and then provide access to the ISPs. If an ISP sucks, people go somewhere else. If all the ISPs suck, then I have no idea.
You use JavaScript. It has libraries to download/decompress stuff, and can process things really well. Just because you don't know how to do it doesn't make it exotically strange and esoteric.
Well done! You made a post without crying about guns and (inadvertently) telling everyone how you're scared to live without them.
Oh noes! The poow widdle man can't buy his assault rifle for "self protection". Jeez. Grow up already. You're like a tragic stuck record bleating on about some point the adults just don't (quite rightly) care about.
Democracies can be republics or not. The two are not contradictory. I have no idea why people have problems with such simple words.
This is no big issue. Simply make owning a firearm a criminal offence, using one in a crime a massive offence, and they won't be used anywhere near as much. Then have the police remove all the guns they come across, and the number of guns decreases massively. When a criminal doesn't feel the need to have a gun in order to commit a crime (as their opponents won't be armed), they no longer use them. Crime will still exist, but far fewer people will die. Of course this won't work in the face of the US's bizarre gun culture, so I guess the point's moot. Complaining about geography or population size has nothing to do with the problems.
Stop hating women, and the problem goes away. Easy.
If we are playing that game, then the US also killed countless people when it destroyed the Indians. Or we could grow up and actually stick to the present day, with the present incarnations of institutions which might have shared a common name or two in history.
So they're sovereign within the realms of the country of which they are part. Wonderful.
Nonsense. Other countries spend less money on comparable healthcare. Many medical treatments were pioneered in other countries, and have since come to the US. Spouting this nonsense is only hurting you and your country. Why do you do it? Because it's easier than admitting your country has serious flaws? That makes more sense than an obviously-intelligent person being so woefully (and wilfully) ignorant.
The government doesn't decide anything. You'd go to the hospital, and get treatment as soon as possible. Or you can spend $50 a month and get top-notch private treatment exactly as you want it (and for your family, too), when you want it. The private option is still there (and for less than you pay in the US), but most people don't need to take advantage of it as the public option is perfectly adequate. You are arguing against spectres which don't exist. It's sad.
Daily Mail. Oh dear.
The taxes are not "huge", as the overheads for care are far lower. No hundreds-of-thousands of paper pushers in the middle, just government-run hospitals doling out government-paid-for treatments and medicine. The outcomes are definitely comparable. I have no idea why you are arguing against it. You're the one wanting to pay big corporations for your health care, yet you rail against taking them out of the picture entirely? Your logic is, *ahem*, "broken".
Well, technically speaking, the price difference to him between having the injury and not having the injury is 0. That's kind of the same as "not paying" in any meaningful sense.
Your book which is nearly 5,000 times more obscure than Danish law... yay for you.
No, one must simply not conflate the religion of the perpetrators with the act, as if they are one and the same thing. You know - just be an adult about it. Again here you go showing that your not unsubstantial intellect has become perverted somewhere in your history, leaning you to tilt at perceived injustices, which serves only to highlight your failings as an honest intellectual, and your rather large axe which you seem to love to grind. Strange.