You are basing your doubts on guesses. If you would stop being so scared of ISIS and look at the safety records of the plants in question, you'd see it's not some scary ISIS guys they're scared of.
Hint: If you ever are asked to back up your position with evidence, linking to a YouTube video is not the best way to do it. I see you favour believing you are right more than actually being right. I weep for your future.
You are leaping to conclusions without a shred of supporting evidence. You are using your prejudices to reinforce your prejudices. I hope you realise how destructive that is.
You are absolutely terrible at making points. Well, apart from "DNS-and-BIND doesn't really understand a lot of things, but boy howdy does he like to get angry about them anyway!". That point you are making amazingly well.
I live in a pretty socialised country and I've not driven in 18 years because I don't need a car, because public transport is fuckin' awesome when made to serve the needs of the public.
Nonsense. For you to be correct, there can not be anyone earning money who dislikes capitalism. As that is clearly not the case, you are wrong. Of course it's comforting to you to think that these people are just like you, as that means you can stop taking their criticism seriously and not have to think about it.
The problem is capitalism doesn't ensure progress and freedom. It might ensure it for some, but for society as a whole, capitalism left to its own devices is inherently dangerous. We only have to look back to the beginning of the industrial revolution for some great examples, and continuing forward where companies move quicker than regulation and end up screwing customers over by abusing their market share, etc.
wattsupwiththat.com has lost its credibility, unfortunately. In their zeal to debunk climate change they stooped to giving a voice to non-experts giving their opinions, rendering the editorial indistinguishable from factual reporting. I don't have the time to wade through those links and try to figure out if they are even pretending to tell the truth or not, and I doubt you have done so.
So with that, can you cite some peer-reviewed sources which have not pissed their credibility up a rope?
The scientific data shows that climate change is entirely man-made. You might want to work on your learning a bit, as you still have quite a way to go.
You do realise all you're achieving here is telling everyone just how shitty your education was, right? "I CAN'T UNDERSTAND THESE FANCY WORDS! LET ME LASH OUT AT SOMETHING TO DISTRACT MYSELF AND ANYONE READING THIS!"
You really are lost. Are you engaging in this desperate struggle to make yourself feel better about the terrible way you lead your life? Is this more for you than anyone else? It sure seems like it from here, as you are arguing against some very basic concepts which have been demonstrated time and time again, screaming for evidence, when the evidence is a heartbeat away, and any sane adult seriously interested in educating themselves would have crossed paths with it a long time ago.
You appear to be under the impression there is only ever one possible reason for peninsulas to become full islands. Either that or you are trying to make a point, and failing massively. You really need to go back to school.
No. Just no. Yes, ADAC has lots of influence, and cars are indeed popular, but so is cycling. Cycle paths are generally created where cyclists want to ride their bikes, as otherwise the city will have to move them or have to pay for the upkeep of where the cyclists do ride, be it in maintenance or scraping people off the road.
It has been studied. You not knowing about it is more of a damning of your desire to learn than of the topic at hand. Science doesn't care about "political correctness", especially when billions of dollars are on the line. Of course it's easy for you to cling to your pet theories when you can construct "evidence" for them in your own head.
You're not too good at this whole "science" thing are you? It takes a lot more than just a suitable climate to grow crops - it takes good soil, farmers, farming infrastructure, pest control, and so on. You glossing over that is the sign of someone who either doesn't know enough to be discussing this, or who is willing to misrepresent the facts in order to make some sort of point. Your "logic" regarding runaway effects is laughable - those words might sound great in your head, but on paper they say absolutely nothing beyond "SuperKendall should go back to school! It is safe to ignore my blathering".
Cops have more driving training than your average non-Cop, which isn't saying much in the US, but is something you're not considering. I wonder what else you've completely failed to think about.
Slashdot Mirror
Keep telling yourself that and see if that fixes the problem.
You are basing your doubts on guesses. If you would stop being so scared of ISIS and look at the safety records of the plants in question, you'd see it's not some scary ISIS guys they're scared of.
You are indeed an anonymous coward.
Hint: If you ever are asked to back up your position with evidence, linking to a YouTube video is not the best way to do it. I see you favour believing you are right more than actually being right. I weep for your future.
So much conjecture. Are you also a Senior Conspiracy Theorist? Your arrogance is astounding.
And I doubt Trailer Trash will concede that they are spouting nonsense, and the madness continues unabated.
You are leaping to conclusions without a shred of supporting evidence. You are using your prejudices to reinforce your prejudices. I hope you realise how destructive that is.
Not even close.
You are absolutely terrible at making points. Well, apart from "DNS-and-BIND doesn't really understand a lot of things, but boy howdy does he like to get angry about them anyway!". That point you are making amazingly well.
I live in a pretty socialised country and I've not driven in 18 years because I don't need a car, because public transport is fuckin' awesome when made to serve the needs of the public.
You are confusing "roman_mir's bizarre take on freedom" with "wealth as everyone understands it".
And I can see you are against logic.
Nonsense. For you to be correct, there can not be anyone earning money who dislikes capitalism. As that is clearly not the case, you are wrong. Of course it's comforting to you to think that these people are just like you, as that means you can stop taking their criticism seriously and not have to think about it.
The problem is capitalism doesn't ensure progress and freedom. It might ensure it for some, but for society as a whole, capitalism left to its own devices is inherently dangerous. We only have to look back to the beginning of the industrial revolution for some great examples, and continuing forward where companies move quicker than regulation and end up screwing customers over by abusing their market share, etc.
wattsupwiththat.com has lost its credibility, unfortunately. In their zeal to debunk climate change they stooped to giving a voice to non-experts giving their opinions, rendering the editorial indistinguishable from factual reporting. I don't have the time to wade through those links and try to figure out if they are even pretending to tell the truth or not, and I doubt you have done so.
So with that, can you cite some peer-reviewed sources which have not pissed their credibility up a rope?
The scientific data shows that climate change is entirely man-made. You might want to work on your learning a bit, as you still have quite a way to go.
You do realise all you're achieving here is telling everyone just how shitty your education was, right? "I CAN'T UNDERSTAND THESE FANCY WORDS! LET ME LASH OUT AT SOMETHING TO DISTRACT MYSELF AND ANYONE READING THIS!"
It's not flattering, and it can be rectified.
You really are lost. Are you engaging in this desperate struggle to make yourself feel better about the terrible way you lead your life? Is this more for you than anyone else? It sure seems like it from here, as you are arguing against some very basic concepts which have been demonstrated time and time again, screaming for evidence, when the evidence is a heartbeat away, and any sane adult seriously interested in educating themselves would have crossed paths with it a long time ago.
You appear to be under the impression there is only ever one possible reason for peninsulas to become full islands. Either that or you are trying to make a point, and failing massively. You really need to go back to school.
The pedestrians are hit by trams and cars, both of which have human occupants. These lights are there to help them. Calm down.
No. Just no. Yes, ADAC has lots of influence, and cars are indeed popular, but so is cycling. Cycle paths are generally created where cyclists want to ride their bikes, as otherwise the city will have to move them or have to pay for the upkeep of where the cyclists do ride, be it in maintenance or scraping people off the road.
They probably contribute just as much as those people braying for people they don't like to be killed.
You'd rather have the financial impact of swathes of the population being killed in easily-preventable ways, just so you can feel superior to them?
It has been studied. You not knowing about it is more of a damning of your desire to learn than of the topic at hand. Science doesn't care about "political correctness", especially when billions of dollars are on the line. Of course it's easy for you to cling to your pet theories when you can construct "evidence" for them in your own head.
You're not too good at this whole "science" thing are you? It takes a lot more than just a suitable climate to grow crops - it takes good soil, farmers, farming infrastructure, pest control, and so on. You glossing over that is the sign of someone who either doesn't know enough to be discussing this, or who is willing to misrepresent the facts in order to make some sort of point. Your "logic" regarding runaway effects is laughable - those words might sound great in your head, but on paper they say absolutely nothing beyond "SuperKendall should go back to school! It is safe to ignore my blathering".
That's because the question has been answered time and time again. If you are too lazy to look for the answers, you are beyond help.
Cops have more driving training than your average non-Cop, which isn't saying much in the US, but is something you're not considering. I wonder what else you've completely failed to think about.