It's not difficult to understand. The summary states that they will receive double the expected increase. If the extent of your argument is complaining about a slashdot summary, you might just want to stop now.
And as Newton said, "If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants". Tesla's early work wouldn't have been possible without the ground broken by others. His later work, where he claimed to have invented all sorts of bizarre contraptions without a single shred of supporting evidence, however, deserves to be ignored in all science texts, as it has nothing to do with science.
In other words you really have no idea what you're talking about. No data has been faked. It's not "statistically less likely to happen than getting hit by a meteor". It's not ONLY the summer, as has been explained to you time and time again. So yes, it is "straight-up" the realm of idiots and fools, as you made it up.
You are the only one here lying, and it's your religion which is becoming toast. Hint: If you find yourself calling the scientific method bogus, you might just be an idiot.
You seem to be labouring under the impression that you know more than the climate scientists. Either you are mistaken or the scientific method doesn't exist. I wonder which is more likely...
How have the scientists lost all credibility? Their findings are fine - no one has managed to challenge them. The thing about science is it doesn't matter who pays for what - the findings must stand up to scientific rigour before they are accepted into the general body of knowledge.
It sounds like you don't understand the scientific method, and are looking for any excuse to stick your fingers in your ears. You are wasting your brain, but I think you know that, and simply don't care. What a wonderful example for future generations.
Because they are not allowed to work, because so many delicate princesses in the countries in question are so scared of their jobs that people fleeing for their lives from warzones pose strong competition in the job market.
But please keep spouting your xenophobic, cowardly narrative. Whatever gets you through the night, appropriately-named Anonymous Coward.
If only there was some methodology that could be applied to understand the effects of things. Maybe the methodology could involve other people reviewing the findings and making suggestions based on demonstrable evidence... Naah. The mighty S. Petry, Senior Sage doesn't make mistakes.
Or maybe the "global cabal" won't care because the effects are entirely local? Or maybe the evidence for it affecting the local climate of other regions will be found, and this will be addressed. Or you can keep making stuff up to try and feel better about the selfish way you live your life...
Your joke at the expense of others says more about your disdain for your fellow humans than the "liberals" you are so angry with. Real people are having real problems with their lives, and here you are mocking them on Slashdot for yuks. I'd implore you to grow up, but it seems too late.
You are the hipster. Hipsters, if I am permitted to make a generalisation, use arcane technology, loudly, and to make some sort of point. They prefer vinyl over digital, old inefficient bikes over newer models, glasses instead of contact lenses, and so on. Obviously not all hipsters fall into this stereotype.
So you parading around extolling the virtues of paper maps is something one would expect from a hipster.
1) It's not stealing, as no one is being deprived of property. Stealing is not "getting something for free", but "denying someone the use of their property". I hope you understand the difference.
2) Study after study have shown that "pirates" spend above-average amounts on content consumed. People "pirate" things to see if they're worth buying, or to get a copy of a game they already have without copy protection, etc. Sure, some people don't, but to claim they all don't is being dishonest.
I think the problem with people's reactions to climate change is that they don't know how to inform themselves, and so get all outraged and surprised when their entire knowledge of a topic is crafted through a newspaper trying to sell adverts.
You only have yourself to blame if you get your scientific information from the general press.
A terrorist is someone who uses violence or the threat thereof to enact political change. So no, you can't just say "it's a spectrum" and include anyone you want. Well, you can, but it's illogical and anyone with more than a fleeting familiarity with critical thinking knows you are off your rocker.
So yeah, you are an Anonymous Coward par excellence.
That is not evidence. That is your guesswork dressed up with a link to Wikipedia. You're not really looking like someone who gives a shit about credibility.
Their maths might be correct, but they say the TORCH report estimates between 30,000 to 60,000, the WHO's at ~9,000, and "published estimates" between 14,000 and 30,000. The fact you picked the highest of the highest estimates, and pretended like that was the final figure with no doubt reeks of duplicity.
Get a grip. We get it. You don't like nuclear. You'll find more friends if you stop lying to people.
It does have a problem, but they're not stupid enough to let their fear or ignorance lead them to a conclusion which will negatively affect hundreds of thousands of people just to make cowards like you feel better.
Yes, if you make evil racist claims, get prepared to be called an evil racist.
The guy who claims AGW is made up by the Chinese to control the US.... Either you really don't hold the Republicans in high regard or you don't seem to fully comprehend the idiocy of Trump's positions.
"Thousands of terrorists"? Are you really that scared? Or just massively ignorant? Either way you are not operating rationally, and seem woefully confused about reality.
Because she didn't destroy security for all Europe, or even Germany?
Also, it's spelled "Merkel". If you can't even get that right, why should anyone listen to anything you have to say on the matter? Clearly you don't have a full grasp of the situation.
Slashdot Mirror
It's not difficult to understand. The summary states that they will receive double the expected increase. If the extent of your argument is complaining about a slashdot summary, you might just want to stop now.
And as Newton said, "If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants". Tesla's early work wouldn't have been possible without the ground broken by others. His later work, where he claimed to have invented all sorts of bizarre contraptions without a single shred of supporting evidence, however, deserves to be ignored in all science texts, as it has nothing to do with science.
You might not want to post to opinion pieces at WUWT, but to actual papers in real journals. That's if you want people to take you seriously, that is.
You appear to be woefully ignorant of just what has been ascertained, and the level of confidence thereof.
You are getting your scientific learning from the guy who wrote Jurassic Park. Please stop.
In other words you really have no idea what you're talking about. No data has been faked. It's not "statistically less likely to happen than getting hit by a meteor". It's not ONLY the summer, as has been explained to you time and time again. So yes, it is "straight-up" the realm of idiots and fools, as you made it up.
You are the only one here lying, and it's your religion which is becoming toast. Hint: If you find yourself calling the scientific method bogus, you might just be an idiot.
You seem to be labouring under the impression that you know more than the climate scientists. Either you are mistaken or the scientific method doesn't exist. I wonder which is more likely...
How have the scientists lost all credibility? Their findings are fine - no one has managed to challenge them. The thing about science is it doesn't matter who pays for what - the findings must stand up to scientific rigour before they are accepted into the general body of knowledge.
It sounds like you don't understand the scientific method, and are looking for any excuse to stick your fingers in your ears. You are wasting your brain, but I think you know that, and simply don't care. What a wonderful example for future generations.
Because they are not allowed to work, because so many delicate princesses in the countries in question are so scared of their jobs that people fleeing for their lives from warzones pose strong competition in the job market.
But please keep spouting your xenophobic, cowardly narrative. Whatever gets you through the night, appropriately-named Anonymous Coward.
Translation: "I don't understand the science, but I will act as if I do, as clearly the problem must lie elsewhere".
If only there was some methodology that could be applied to understand the effects of things. Maybe the methodology could involve other people reviewing the findings and making suggestions based on demonstrable evidence... Naah. The mighty S. Petry, Senior Sage doesn't make mistakes.
Or maybe the "global cabal" won't care because the effects are entirely local? Or maybe the evidence for it affecting the local climate of other regions will be found, and this will be addressed. Or you can keep making stuff up to try and feel better about the selfish way you live your life...
Your joke at the expense of others says more about your disdain for your fellow humans than the "liberals" you are so angry with. Real people are having real problems with their lives, and here you are mocking them on Slashdot for yuks. I'd implore you to grow up, but it seems too late.
You are the hipster. Hipsters, if I am permitted to make a generalisation, use arcane technology, loudly, and to make some sort of point. They prefer vinyl over digital, old inefficient bikes over newer models, glasses instead of contact lenses, and so on. Obviously not all hipsters fall into this stereotype.
So you parading around extolling the virtues of paper maps is something one would expect from a hipster.
1) It's not stealing, as no one is being deprived of property. Stealing is not "getting something for free", but "denying someone the use of their property". I hope you understand the difference.
2) Study after study have shown that "pirates" spend above-average amounts on content consumed. People "pirate" things to see if they're worth buying, or to get a copy of a game they already have without copy protection, etc. Sure, some people don't, but to claim they all don't is being dishonest.
Apart from that, you're spot on.
With TPB it's just a matter of clicking on a download link...
I think the problem with people's reactions to climate change is that they don't know how to inform themselves, and so get all outraged and surprised when their entire knowledge of a topic is crafted through a newspaper trying to sell adverts.
You only have yourself to blame if you get your scientific information from the general press.
A terrorist is someone who uses violence or the threat thereof to enact political change. So no, you can't just say "it's a spectrum" and include anyone you want. Well, you can, but it's illogical and anyone with more than a fleeting familiarity with critical thinking knows you are off your rocker.
So yeah, you are an Anonymous Coward par excellence.
That is not evidence. That is your guesswork dressed up with a link to Wikipedia. You're not really looking like someone who gives a shit about credibility.
Their maths might be correct, but they say the TORCH report estimates between 30,000 to 60,000, the WHO's at ~9,000, and "published estimates" between 14,000 and 30,000. The fact you picked the highest of the highest estimates, and pretended like that was the final figure with no doubt reeks of duplicity.
Get a grip. We get it. You don't like nuclear. You'll find more friends if you stop lying to people.
Seeing as there are over 1.6bn Muslims and everyone is not dead, you are clearly wrong.
It does have a problem, but they're not stupid enough to let their fear or ignorance lead them to a conclusion which will negatively affect hundreds of thousands of people just to make cowards like you feel better.
Yes, if you make evil racist claims, get prepared to be called an evil racist.
The guy who claims AGW is made up by the Chinese to control the US.... Either you really don't hold the Republicans in high regard or you don't seem to fully comprehend the idiocy of Trump's positions.
You are missing the point entirely, which is not particularly surprising.
"Thousands of terrorists"? Are you really that scared? Or just massively ignorant? Either way you are not operating rationally, and seem woefully confused about reality.
Because she didn't destroy security for all Europe, or even Germany?
Also, it's spelled "Merkel". If you can't even get that right, why should anyone listen to anything you have to say on the matter? Clearly you don't have a full grasp of the situation.