So you ignore the very vocal moderate Muslims and explain that they don't exist because [... insert ramblings...]. Brilliant. What a great mind you are. Simply amazing.
You are so single-minded it's hilarious, yet bordering on worrying. What happened to you? Can a society be that broken that people like you are wilfully released onto the streets? You are getting confused by some very simple terms, and keep on making some rather entertaining spelling mistakes time and time again. Why anyone should listen to your childish hate is beyond me, especially when neither facts nor even spelling agree with you.
Yeah, the world was much better when racists and sexists could feel free to vomit hatred into the faces of the oppressed with the certainty no one would speak out against them. Aaaah simpler times.
You might say that, but the evidence says otherwise. Guys who raped guys were frequently punished by law, whereas guys who raped women were often not treated anywhere as harshly. Husbands could rape their wives with impunity. You seem to have a warped understanding of why feminism exists, and an even more warped understanding of western legal systems' approaches towards rape of either gender.
It might be hilarious to you, but to feminists like me it's just as disgusting. I don't discriminate the way you seem to do, or think all feminists do. If you think feminism has taught you to cheer men being raped, you don't understand the tenets of feminism. Thanks for letting everyone know just how ignorant you are of this topic, yet how powerful your arrogance is for you to ignore that obvious fact and weigh in anyway, vomiting some pathetic attempt at deriding a movement which seeks gender equality. You must be so proud.
There he goes again, letting his childish, irrational hatred pollute another discussion. Grow up, you tiny-minded fool. Your children won't thank you for being so intellectually lazy.
You're not too good with numbers, are you. 70% of the 1,000 people surveyed by NBC and WSJ think the country is headed in the wrong direction. Extrapolating that to all of the US is, well, what I'd expect from someone who would rather make an incorrect point just to make a point. Stop lying, please.
It does keep it down, as the health service gets quite a discount considering it buys drugs for the entire country. You're arguing something that is patently not true.
If the followers of said religion have a shared history and culture, yes. 'Race' is a pretty vague word to begin with, so don't be surprised it means things you didn't assume it to.
And you **DO** realise that not all wind turbines use permanent magnets, and plenty of research is under way to reduce or remove reliance upon them for the rest of the turbines. Coal plants will still always be coal plants. You're not too good at this "logic" thing...
Your feet won't always be dry. It took a massive tragedy for Dutch sea defences to be as good as they are now, and with every rise in sea level, the amount of work required to hold it off grows massively, as the storm surges will get larger, and the frequency of dangerous storms will increase.
So yeah - looking at the present is not a great way to evaluate the future. Shocker.
There you go again confusing sea ice with land ice. You do this every single time, and it gets pointed out to you every single time. Your failure to take on board such simple information is staggering, but would go quite some way to explain why you believe abject nonsense in the face of scientific rigour. Or, maybe, you do understand the difference, but are prepared to lie in order to make some point. Pick one. Please. It's tragic, but fascinating.
You really should understand what rising sea levels mean to storm surges, then reevaluate what you just said. Just a trivial amount of rise can have massive effects in the presence of a storm. The track record for the US properly building and maintaining sea defences are not great, so I don't know why you suddenly assume all that changed. Plus there will be decidedly less money to deal with all this stuff as every piece of vital infrastructure on the coasts will have to get protected, thinning the already thin funds.
And just a side note: It appears you think all SJWs follow the same handbook (otherwise you made a massive, obviously specious generalisation, devoid of logical value), but that's just nonsense. I could talk without end about examples of people from every flavour and walk of life who overreact or act without civility - pretending this is just a 'SJW' thing is nonsense. Lumping those in with those who are working towards a more tolerant society (where the circumstances of one's birth or private life choices which affect no-one else are not used as weapons to systematically screw with them) is not really helping you seem rational - it's the very notion of equality generations have been fighting for hundreds of years. A SJW's idea (if we understand what 'social justice' means) of having a conversation is everyone talks without some immature fuckwhippet in the corner disrupting the conversation because he doesn't like how gay/black/straight/white/Muslim/Christian some other participants are. Feel free to ignore this and tar everyone working for a better future with the same brush if it makes you feel better. After all, why bother, right?
Other western countries with similar or lower levels of wealth can do it. There is no reason the US can't. Just look around the world at other developed countries and see what you can learn.
Which would mean you standing about 150m from the blades, and even then it'll be quieter than the road you drove down to get to them... If you are going to complain about them, at least complain about something real.
Which has nothing to do with this. Are you that insecure that whenever someone you like gets criticised you have to leap to their defence by pointing out someone from the "other team" who also screwed up? As if that somehow makes up for your guy's screwups? Most people grow out of that sort of mentality after about 9 or 10, right?
Slashdot Mirror
So you ignore the very vocal moderate Muslims and explain that they don't exist because [... insert ramblings...]. Brilliant. What a great mind you are. Simply amazing.
You are right - you can get a much cheaper phone for the grandkids to not call you on.
You are so single-minded it's hilarious, yet bordering on worrying. What happened to you? Can a society be that broken that people like you are wilfully released onto the streets? You are getting confused by some very simple terms, and keep on making some rather entertaining spelling mistakes time and time again. Why anyone should listen to your childish hate is beyond me, especially when neither facts nor even spelling agree with you.
"Perfect"? Hardly. That is your wishful thinking. You were failed by your educators.
To let rational people spot idiots a mile off?
Yeah, the world was much better when racists and sexists could feel free to vomit hatred into the faces of the oppressed with the certainty no one would speak out against them. Aaaah simpler times.
You might say that, but the evidence says otherwise. Guys who raped guys were frequently punished by law, whereas guys who raped women were often not treated anywhere as harshly. Husbands could rape their wives with impunity. You seem to have a warped understanding of why feminism exists, and an even more warped understanding of western legal systems' approaches towards rape of either gender.
It might be hilarious to you, but to feminists like me it's just as disgusting. I don't discriminate the way you seem to do, or think all feminists do. If you think feminism has taught you to cheer men being raped, you don't understand the tenets of feminism. Thanks for letting everyone know just how ignorant you are of this topic, yet how powerful your arrogance is for you to ignore that obvious fact and weigh in anyway, vomiting some pathetic attempt at deriding a movement which seeks gender equality. You must be so proud.
There he goes again, letting his childish, irrational hatred pollute another discussion. Grow up, you tiny-minded fool. Your children won't thank you for being so intellectually lazy.
You're not too good with numbers, are you. 70% of the 1,000 people surveyed by NBC and WSJ think the country is headed in the wrong direction. Extrapolating that to all of the US is, well, what I'd expect from someone who would rather make an incorrect point just to make a point. Stop lying, please.
You missed out the last part... "... by preventing people from being able to buy a life-saving drug". Yaaaaay. Not really the Robin Hood type.
It's the worst of both worlds - universal coverage with the prices of private healthcare. It's a first world joke.
It does keep it down, as the health service gets quite a discount considering it buys drugs for the entire country. You're arguing something that is patently not true.
It's not due to it being "un-PC", but it being ridiculous, ineffective, and counter-productive.
You don't even understand the irony of Americans complaining about immigrants?
If the followers of said religion have a shared history and culture, yes. 'Race' is a pretty vague word to begin with, so don't be surprised it means things you didn't assume it to.
s/dywolf/mi
And you **DO** realise that not all wind turbines use permanent magnets, and plenty of research is under way to reduce or remove reliance upon them for the rest of the turbines. Coal plants will still always be coal plants. You're not too good at this "logic" thing...
Your feet won't always be dry. It took a massive tragedy for Dutch sea defences to be as good as they are now, and with every rise in sea level, the amount of work required to hold it off grows massively, as the storm surges will get larger, and the frequency of dangerous storms will increase.
So yeah - looking at the present is not a great way to evaluate the future. Shocker.
It only takes a slight change to see large changes in storm surges. That's the real worry at this stage.
There you go again confusing sea ice with land ice. You do this every single time, and it gets pointed out to you every single time. Your failure to take on board such simple information is staggering, but would go quite some way to explain why you believe abject nonsense in the face of scientific rigour. Or, maybe, you do understand the difference, but are prepared to lie in order to make some point. Pick one. Please. It's tragic, but fascinating.
You really should understand what rising sea levels mean to storm surges, then reevaluate what you just said. Just a trivial amount of rise can have massive effects in the presence of a storm. The track record for the US properly building and maintaining sea defences are not great, so I don't know why you suddenly assume all that changed. Plus there will be decidedly less money to deal with all this stuff as every piece of vital infrastructure on the coasts will have to get protected, thinning the already thin funds.
And just a side note: It appears you think all SJWs follow the same handbook (otherwise you made a massive, obviously specious generalisation, devoid of logical value), but that's just nonsense. I could talk without end about examples of people from every flavour and walk of life who overreact or act without civility - pretending this is just a 'SJW' thing is nonsense. Lumping those in with those who are working towards a more tolerant society (where the circumstances of one's birth or private life choices which affect no-one else are not used as weapons to systematically screw with them) is not really helping you seem rational - it's the very notion of equality generations have been fighting for hundreds of years. A SJW's idea (if we understand what 'social justice' means) of having a conversation is everyone talks without some immature fuckwhippet in the corner disrupting the conversation because he doesn't like how gay/black/straight/white/Muslim/Christian some other participants are. Feel free to ignore this and tar everyone working for a better future with the same brush if it makes you feel better. After all, why bother, right?
Other western countries with similar or lower levels of wealth can do it. There is no reason the US can't. Just look around the world at other developed countries and see what you can learn.
Which would mean you standing about 150m from the blades, and even then it'll be quieter than the road you drove down to get to them... If you are going to complain about them, at least complain about something real.
Which has nothing to do with this. Are you that insecure that whenever someone you like gets criticised you have to leap to their defence by pointing out someone from the "other team" who also screwed up? As if that somehow makes up for your guy's screwups? Most people grow out of that sort of mentality after about 9 or 10, right?