Slashdot Mirror


Emergency Room Visits From Distracted Walking Skyrocket (cbsnews.com)

schwit1 writes: An estimated ten percent of pedestrian injuries that land people in emergency rooms are due to distracted walking, a recent study found. That's thousands of people injured — sometimes killed. In San Diego, investigators believe Joshua Burwell may have been trying to take a picture of the sunset when he took a fatal fall some 40 feet off Sunset Cliffs. "A lot of people don't admit that they do it," said Dr. Claudette Lajam, an orthopedic surgeon. "It's getting worse as we have more and more features on these devices that we carry around with us that can distract us."

142 comments

  1. Walking Skyrocket? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Last thing I'd want to see.

    1. Re:Walking Skyrocket? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Glad I'm not the only one that couldn't understand this headline without reading it a couple of times.

      "What the hell is a distracted walking skyrocket?"

    2. Re:Walking Skyrocket? by Racemaniac · · Score: 1

      Same here, but it sure does sound like something that will send you to the emergency room

    3. Re:Walking Skyrocket? by wjcofkc · · Score: 2

      You beat me to it. I just woke up and read that five or six times before my eyes met the summary. Talk about confused. At least it made me smile.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    4. Re:Walking Skyrocket? by pruedz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Talking about strange headlines, one of my country most read newspapers published the following headline: "Law and Justice: Two hands of the same arm"

    5. Re: Walking Skyrocket? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here again it required the fist of Fate to open my eyes to this unprecedented betrayal of the peoples.

      by guess who

    6. Re:Walking Skyrocket? by rossdee · · Score: 1

      In a number of countries, New Years Eve is a time for letting off fireworks. I am sure there will be some injuries and burns

      and the firdt thing I thought of when I read the headline was the great panjandrum

    7. Re:Walking Skyrocket? by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

      I think it was supposed to be "rocking Skywalker"

      With the new Star Wars movie out, this is definitely news for nerds.

    8. Re:Walking Skyrocket? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Enquiring minds want to know what distracted that walking skyrocket and what kind of treatment it got at the hospital.

    9. Re:Walking Skyrocket? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know.

      It looks like someone was typing something, (cell phone, smart phone?) and there was a word substitution and no one ever bothered to proofread.

    10. Re:Walking Skyrocket? by clovis · · Score: 1

      I remember when we were first discussing about using skyrocket as a verb. I told everyone it was a mistake.
      Did anyone listen? Did they?
      And do you see what happened? Now do you see?

    11. Re:Walking Skyrocket? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I was riding my skyrocket.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    12. Re:Walking Skyrocket? by arth1 · · Score: 2

      You beat me to it. I just woke up and read that five or six times before my eyes met the summary. Talk about confused. At least it made me smile.

      Or someone in Star Wars epidose VII, which I haven't had a chance to see yet.

    13. Re:Walking Skyrocket? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    14. Re:Walking Skyrocket? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Those kids and their fads, yesterday it was that ice bucket challenge, today it's distracted walking skyrocket...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:Walking Skyrocket? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually when I read the title I was under the impression that the walking skyrockets were the ones in the ER. Which can't be good news for anyone.

    16. Re:Walking Skyrocket? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one of my country most read newspapers

      He didn't say which country. Please search again using all languages and get back to us.

    17. Re:Walking Skyrocket? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There has been an unfortunate increase in the use of "skyrocket" instead of "increase".

    18. Re:Walking Skyrocket? by nytes · · Score: 1

      Were you distracted?

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
  2. How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just an attempt to rustle jimmies in the comments and get more advertising views....shame, shame, shame.

    1. Re:How is this news? by truck_soccer · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the internet, you must have arrived here accidentally from the year 1993.

  3. THIRD POST by Theovon · · Score: 0

    I win?

  4. Personally by liqu1d · · Score: 4, Informative

    I wish they'd take a step back and let natural selection take its course.

    1. Re:Personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a mobile version of the Natural Selection mod for Half Life?

    2. Re:Personally by aix+tom · · Score: 2

      But WATCH OUT!!! before you take that step back. Or you might get hit by a distracted walking skyrocket.

    3. Re:Personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And put the people who want a technology solution to the "problem" in a padded room and permanently lock the door. They will live the rest of their life in absolute safety. (Not saying how long they will live...)

    4. Re:Personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been great but you've been horrible! Don't forget to tip your waitress.

    5. Re:Personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still don't wanna be the person who killed someone when they walked in front of my truck because they weren't paying attention :(

    6. Re:Personally by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Obviously it has a reality tie in. Like that ... what's the name of that Google game?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:Personally by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      At least it wasn't a walking redrocket (and that is not indended to be a Fallout 4 reference). :D

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    8. Re: Personally by liqu1d · · Score: 1

      Think of it as doing your part for the gene pool. A healthy dose of chlorine (in the shape of a truck).

    9. Re:Personally by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      I don't know what that mod does but I like to imagine it re-spawns you with whatever weapon was used to kill you.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  5. Dangerous Habits by sbrown7792 · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least reading Slashdot isn't dange^^&*((_-/... NO CARRIER

    1. Re:Dangerous Habits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the problem right there! No carrier! Get someone to carry you, no more problem.

    2. Re:Dangerous Habits by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      At least reading Slashdot isn't dange^^&*((_-/... NO CARRIER

      I don't know. Reading one of Bennet Haselton's posts might make you want to go jump off the nearest cliff.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re:Dangerous Habits by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Wow... Does Slashdot have a dial in BBS now? If so they probably need to adjust their modem settings to Half duplex.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Dangerous Habits by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Still reading Slashdot on dialup?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:Dangerous Habits by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Old joke (and fewer and fewer geeks get it): What do internet junkies and F-18 pilots have in common?

      Both break out in cold sweat if they find NO CARRIER.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Dangerous Habits by nytes · · Score: 1

      And the distracted walking skyrocket claims yet another victim...

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    7. Re:Dangerous Habits by antdude · · Score: 1

      Wow, dial-up modems! ;)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  6. I have a plan... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since most of these distractions are probably smartphone related, and contemporary smartphones tend to have pretty substantial activity-logging capabilities and sensor packages, it would be technically feasible to get an 'aircraft blackbox' style snapshot of what was going on at the time of the injury.

    Anyone know if you could get away with an insurance policy that demands such data, in the event of a claim, and then attempts to deny coverage for any costs deemed to have been incurred because of negligent distraction? Just think of how many claims you could deny with the right data...

    1. Re:I have a plan... by vikingpower · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sounds like a typically American plan.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    2. Re:I have a plan... by BitZtream · · Score: 0

      Anyone know if you could get away with an insurance policy that demands such data

      Plenty do it for cars, and if you thought that was a good idea, you're a moron.

      All that happens is that if there is any at all indication of you doing something 'dangerous', your rate goes up.

      No ones rate goes down, everyone will still pay AT LEAST what they pay now, but most people will pay more for the 'danger' tax.

      Just think of how bad of an idea it is to even mention it.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    3. Re:I have a plan... by ickleberry · · Score: 1

      Great, another piece of technology that you supposedly own and is willing to 'rat you out' to the System

    4. Re:I have a plan... by ITRambo · · Score: 1

      We in America proudly call it "stupidity insurance".

    5. Re:I have a plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sensor package says that you almost stepped out in front of a car while writing that post.

    6. Re:I have a plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think sex Walking Skyrocket sounds perverted as fuck.

      Captcha: forked

    7. Re:I have a plan... by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

      Better yet, lets just make walking while distracted illegal. Think of all the lives we could save. THINK OF THE CHILDREN!

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    8. Re:I have a plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Captcha: fucked.

    9. Re:I have a plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it be easier to use the bevy of sensors to detect that you are walking and shut down the apps and just show the time on the screen along with a message saying, "you are walking - pay attention to your surroundings"?

    10. Re:I have a plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody's rate may go down but if you're not typically "doing something dangerous" then your rate is less likely to go up as it otherwise inevitably would.

    11. Re:I have a plan... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      If you think sex Walking Skyrocket sounds perverted as fuck.

      If you think sex, nothing sounds perverted.

    12. Re:I have a plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My insurance rate went down every year for the 11 or so years that I paid on time.

      I started at over $200/mo with only liability and my last insurance payment was around $80 for full coverage.

      So, your rate does go down, you just have to not get into an accident and always pay on time.

    13. Re:I have a plan... by nytes · · Score: 1

      Anyone know if you could get away with an insurance policy that demands such data, in the event of a claim, and then attempts to deny coverage for any costs deemed to have been incurred because of negligent distraction? Just think of how many claims you could deny with the right data...

      Hang on, I'll look it up on my smartpho!@#$!#$#RFAEKSF

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    14. Re:I have a plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great idea, but lock the smart/computer part but allow phone conversation or you will lose even more market share.

    15. Re:I have a plan... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Better yet, lets just make walking while distracted illegal. Think of all the lives we could save. THINK OF THE CHILDREN!

      [SELF] Rushes off to buy shares in a prison company.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  7. Isn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it great that truly stupid people with useless genes help cull the herd while screaming OHLongJohnson!!!!

    funny captcha: reread

  8. Ugh by Jethro · · Score: 5, Funny

    I might just be tired, but it took me forever to figure out what a walking skyrocket is.

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    1. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds dangerous, and even more so if it's a distracted walking skyrocket.

    2. Re:Ugh by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      Yeah, me too and be careful, if they're distracted they could put you in hospital.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    3. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ring ring!

      Is your skyrocket running? Well, you better go catch it!

    4. Re:Ugh by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I might just be tired, but it took me forever to figure out what a walking skyrocket is.

      I'm tired AND drunk, and I would have gotten it right away, but I was trying to tweet out a picture of my dick, and accidentally walked into a busy intersection.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:Ugh by 14erCleaner · · Score: 2

      Now I'm thinking of writing a cellphone app called "Skyrocket", that lets you video yourself while walking.

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    6. Re:Ugh by Jethro · · Score: 2

      Well that'll learn ya.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    7. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. Looks like there was a word substitution and no one bothered to proofread before posting.

    8. Re:Ugh by nytes · · Score: 1

      You got caught with your pants down?

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    9. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just read the spacex story. So there you go - it lands, then shuffles over and gets in its kennel. Hanger. Box, whatever.

  9. Zombieism by TheAngryCat · · Score: 1

    It is the predicted Zombie Apocalypse. Leave it to darwyn and the problem will fix itself.

  10. Title can be misread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was trying to work out why a skyrocket (of any kind, not just a walking one, let alone a distracted walking one) would be visiting an emergency room.

    I came to the conclusion that maybe it was a human skyrocket, like a human cannonball.

    Now I wonder how anyone gets a job as a human skyrocket.

    BTW: it was sad to read about the death of the dwarf human cannonball - we'll never see an artist of his caliber again.

  11. Walking and texting by Theovon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In all seriousness, texting while doing something else has become a conspicuous problem. Probably not worse than all of the other “problems” that have occurred throughout history whenever a new technology arose, but nevertheless something we’re going to have to adapt to. Texting while driving seems insane, and speech-to-text doesn’t help a whole hell of a lot. Then again, some people seem to have trouble adjusting their radio settings without crashing.

    The interesting thing about texting while walking is that making a law about it also seems absurd. You’re not operating heavy equipment, just mostly putting yourself at risk of tripping. And if you injure someone else, then there are already laws that address the liability there. A huge factor here comes down to the individual’s talents at multitasking and using peripheral vision. I know that I can text while walking because long before cell phones, I’d already developed good use of both multitasking and peripheral vision, so like many others I have observed, I can walk and text and manage to not trip on unexpected obstacles, bump into other people, walk in front of cars, etc.

    However, lots of people are not good at this yet insist on doing it anyway. That being said, this isn’t a lot different from many other risky activities people engage in that we can’t and shouldn’t try to regulate, like excessive alcohol, weed, unprotected sex, and driving while stupid. We can only address the after-effects when people harm others as a result of acting irresponsibly.

    1. Re:Walking and texting by twdorris · · Score: 1

      And if you injure someone else, then there are already laws that address the liability there.

      As I'm sure you know, that's absolutely irrelevant in the minds of elected officials looking to act on the latest headlines. The only saving point in this particular case is that it really has to be beyond that "crazy threshold" to consider passing a law that makes it illegal to walk and chew gum, I mean text, at the same time. SURELY that's clearly going to far in government regulation. Please, please, let there be some small hint of sanity left.

    2. Re:Walking and texting by tomxor · · Score: 1

      Laws against texting while walking would be absurd, but people do it all the time and i can see why it's dangerous, it's also really annoying when you're trying to walk on a busy pavement, i've had to resort to saying "look out" when someone in front of me has their head firmly glued in the downward position and i have no where to go, most of the time it just means they wander aimlessly into people and everyone else has to walk around them - in rare cases i've encountered a mob of mobile zombies and just had to stop to let them sense my presence and navigate around me as if the only way they can see their surroundings is by feel

      Perhaps i need to make more noise or something... if they all white canes it would be easier to identify them and treat them the same as blind people... perhaps that should be the punishment for causing an accident while texting :P (no offence to blind people)

      On the flip side: i've texted while walking plenty of times, but i keep it short, i hold the phone up in front of me like a total dork and if i need to cross a road or there are more things in front of me than my peripheral vision can make sense of i slow down and look away from the phone...

    3. Re:Walking and texting by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      In all seriousness, texting while doing something else has become a conspicuous problem.

      And how - I've personally saved two young ladies who were texting and walking out into traffic. Both gave me a nasty look at first, then realized the situation and thanked me.

      They both went right back to testing, however

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    4. Re:Walking and texting by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      And how - I've personally saved two young ladies who were texting and walking out into traffic. Both gave me a nasty look at first, then realized the situation and thanked me.

      That could be the beginning of an excellent Penthouse Forum story.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:Walking and texting by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      They both went right back to testing, however

      Sound like they failed.

    6. Re:Walking and texting by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Laws against texting while walking would be absurd, but people do it all the time and i can see why it's dangerous, it's also really annoying when you're trying to walk on a busy pavement, i've had to resort to saying "look out" when someone in front of me has their head firmly glued in the downward position and i have no where to go, most of the time it just means they wander aimlessly into people and everyone else has to walk around them - in rare cases i've encountered a mob of mobile zombies and just had to stop to let them sense my presence and navigate around me as if the only way they can see their surroundings is by feel

      I just bump into these people. I let them walk right into me. I love the startled look they have! And if they're in front of me, walking slowly on a busy street, I am sure to make shoulder contact as I brush by them. These people are oblivious.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    7. Re:Walking and texting by MacTO · · Score: 1

      Why is the bit about "not operating heavy equipment" relevant in many (if not most) cases? You're probably surrounded by heavy equipment if you're walking around a public place. In that respect, it isn't terribly different from the typical workplace where everyone is responsible for following safety protocols. It doesn't matter if you're the person operating the machine or a visitor who is on a tour. Whether people should be surrounded by heavy equipment in public places is another question, but it is the case and we have to deal with it.

      The ability to multitask and use peripheral vision is also irrelevant. I know that I can use my device (may that be a mobile phone or a printed book) and be aware of my surroundings. Except when I'm not aware of my surroundings. That lack of awareness may happen once a day or once a decade. While the intervals between the lapses will affect the frequency of detrimental outcomes, it will not affect the probability of a detrimental outcome when that lapse happens.

    8. Re:Walking and texting by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      And how - I've personally saved two young ladies who were texting and walking out into traffic. Both gave me a nasty look at first, then realized the situation and thanked me.

      That could be the beginning of an excellent Penthouse Forum story.

      Hehe..... I don't usually write letters to the forum, but the most amazing thing happened to me the other day...........

      Brat - you got me thinking - they were both cute...

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    9. Re:Walking and texting by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      They both went right back to testing, however

      Sound like they failed.

      Damned autocorrect!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    10. Re:Walking and texting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly what I do as well. Moving out of these peoples way is just to be an Enabler.

    11. Re:Walking and texting by dasgoober · · Score: 1

      I just yell, "Pay Attention!!"

    12. Re:Walking and texting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The interesting thing about texting while walking is that making a law about it also seems absurd.

      It's only absurd because laws like these are NEVER enforced equally. Like that sheriff's deputy in California (2013) that killed a bicyclist because he was texting while driving and was found not guilty of driving while texting and criminal negligence by reason of being a police officer.

    13. Re:Walking and texting by tomxor · · Score: 1

      I used to do that sort of thing, like shouting "DIVISIBILITY" will running at unwilling solid walls of opposing pedestrians... i've since learned to calm down :)

  12. Natural selection folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Move along, nothing to see here....

  13. but texting while walking can be funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without it we wouldn't have gems like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umRXAkZ8Xo0

    If I were there, when that happened, I would have no problem whatsoever laughing out loud.

    Moron.

  14. Devices need a collision avoidance app by schwit1 · · Score: 1

    Have the device warn the user IF the device is in motion and having active inputs and getting close to an obstacle.

    1. Re:Devices need a collision avoidance app by smooth+wombat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So you want a technological solution to solve a human-induced problem created by technology?

      I guess using the 2 pounds of gray matter rattling around in one's skull is too obvious a solution.

      Screw technology, let people maim or kill themselves. If they're too stupid to be aware of their surroundings, nature will take its course.

      This is no different than our ancestors from tens of thousands of years ago who didn't keep an eye out for dangers around them. They were removed from the gene pool.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    2. Re:Devices need a collision avoidance app by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      The device... the walking skyrocket you mean? Are you telling me there's some kind of safety button for when these skyrockets get distracted?

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    3. Re:Devices need a collision avoidance app by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Screw technology, let people maim or kill themselves.

      That's fine when it's only them who get affected. Frequently it's not them we give a shit about, but the others that they injury either physically or psychologically in the process. A close friend of mine ran into someone who was distracted with his phone who stepped on to the cycling lane without looking. The guy started abusing my friend because his phone was knocked out of his hand and broken. But my friend didn't care because he was too busy being unconscious on the ground.

      Similarly a friend of the family was a truck driver. Emphasis on the was part. He ran over and killed a young cyclist who was off with the fairies headphones blasting rock music and all and clearly didn't see a the red light. He can no longer drive. He's psychologically messed up even though the very short investigation concluded he was 0% at fault.

      I'm all for Darwin awards but karma can sometimes be a slow and unfair bastard affecting innocent bystanders.

    4. Re:Devices need a collision avoidance app by dcooper_db9 · · Score: 1

      So you want a technological solution to solve a human-induced problem created by technology?

      Yes, I do. Or rather I want to live in a community where people use all the tools available to protect themselves against threats to their safety. People have such an oversimplified understanding of how natural selection works. It's not only the individual who has to be strongest, it's the individual and it's family and it's community.

      In the classic example of a lion pride we think of the male lion who has to be strong enough to procreate. We forget that for a lion pride to thrive it has to eat, and it's the female lion that does the hunting. The strongest pride isn't simply the one with the biggest male. The strongest pride survives drought, disease and myriad dangers. In order for the cubs to become strong adults they have to learn. They explore and test themselves. They make mistakes and survive to live another day.

      Natural selection has prepared humans to climb trees to escape danger. It's prepared us to fight when necessary to protect ourselves and our families. Natural selection hasn't directly prepared us for all the noises and lights of the modern world. All it takes to snuff out life is glancing down at a cell phone and absent mindedly stepping off the curb into traffic. Humans don't thrive because we never make mistakes. Humans thrive because we use signals and systems to help us navigate a deadly world. If an app can alert us to danger that's just one more tool in our belt.

      --
      I do not block ads. I do block third party scripts.
    5. Re:Devices need a collision avoidance app by nytes · · Score: 1

      Better yet, have the device take a selfie video as the collision occurs and automatically post it to youtube.

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
  15. Did you hear the one... by wjcofkc · · Score: 2

    About the Distracted Walking Skyrocket?

    Or...

    A Distracted Skyrocket walks into an emergency room and says to the intake nurse...

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    1. Re:Did you hear the one... by Lodlaiden · · Score: 1

      Does he wind up bumping into Uranus?

      --
      Suborbital [spaceflight] is the special olympics of spaceflight. - Rei
    2. Re:Did you hear the one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where the hell is the "skyrocket" in this situation anyway?

      Isn't it "walking while using a smartphone", not "walking while skyrocket"?

  16. Laws! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need laws against this, stat! Won't someone think of the children! Ban distracted walking NOW! *Before* your little Johnny falls off a cliff!

    1. Re:Laws! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      It would be ok if everyone else does it too.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Laws! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      If everyone else distracted walked off a cliff, would you do it too?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  17. Darwinism... by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 0

    it always wins.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Darwinism... by iTrawl · · Score: 1

      It will just select the best face-in-screen walkers out there. Soon enough we'll have plenty people able to cross a busy street while playing Time Waste Saga without getting run over.

      --
      "Everybody's naked underneath" -- The Doctor
    2. Re:Darwinism... by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      it's far more likely to select those who don't bother with such things.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    3. Re:Darwinism... by PPH · · Score: 1

      Is it any wonder that the iOS system predecessor was named .... Darwin?

      Steve Jobs throwing some chlorine into the gene pool.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  18. Simple solution by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    Let insurance companies raise the premiums 100-300% and let government programs bill back the cost of the coverage to every source of incoming including food stamps.

    1. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly what we need! More insurance company AND government involvement. Surprised you forgot to add lawyers to that list.

    2. Re:Simple solution by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      As if you need to add the vultures to the roadkill. Why bother, they come on their own.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  19. Samurai Smartphone Parade by 12WTF$ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lovely Japanese take on the curse of distracted walking:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Bump: 66% of people have run into others when using a smartphone while walking.
    Fall: 3.6 % of people have fallen from a platform when texting while walking.
    Trip: 18% of people have tripped when using a smartphone while walking.
    99% of people think using a smartphone while walking is dangerous.
    73% of people have used a smartphone while walking.
    Please look forward when you are walking.
    Using a smartphone while walking is dangerous.

    --
    Cryonics - Keep cool and carry on.
    1. Re:Samurai Smartphone Parade by pnkwomo · · Score: 1

      Cute! This one is pretty good too.

  20. Two words by scunc · · Score: 2

    Natural selection.

    1. Re:Two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, there is no age restriction for distracted walking. You can just as easily have a dead teen due to distracted walking (which natural selection is likely to succeed) as a dead tech-savvy grandpa (where his "stupid" gene already lives on in later generations).

  21. Burwell well well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Joshua Burwell may have been trying to take a picture of the sunset when he took a fatal fall some 40 feet off Sunset Cliffs. "A lot of people don't admit that they do it,"

    If I died after falling off a cliff, I definitely wouldn't want to admit it.

  22. As always by nospam007 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Think of it as evolution in action.

    1. Re:As always by phorm · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately it's probably like drunk/distracted driving. For some reason, the person doing the completely idiotic thing is often *not* the one who perishes, but instead makes others victims of his/her stupidity.

  23. Darwin Awards by sjbe · · Score: 1

    This is no different than our ancestors from tens of thousands of years ago who didn't keep an eye out for dangers around them. They were removed from the gene pool.

    That only works if it removes them prior to reproduction. Otherwise it's merely a tragedy, not a Darwin Award because they have not removed themselves from the gene pool.

    1. Re:Darwin Awards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That only works if it removes them prior to reproduction.

      For a Darwin Award, yes. For the betterment of society, no. Just because a child grew up in the care of a distracted idiot does not mean the child will follow suit. Even in cases where the child followed the hereditary example and has not deviated, learning of a parent's death by "walking into downed power line after ignoring warning signs and stepping over a traffic cone" may cause a re-examination of family habits.

      And if the child still fails to learn, there will always be more environmental hazards, and their actions can be a lesson for unrelated individuals.

    2. Re:Darwin Awards by hattig · · Score: 1

      I think the best way to enforce further evolution for humanity is to introduce a form of artificial selection.

      In this case, killing dumb people. Just as the weak one is sacrificed to the lion, shall the dumb one be sacrificed to the ... well, maybe we could televise that.

      If, in any given year, you are in the bottom 1% of usefulness (criteria to be determined, but maybe appearing on daytime TV will count), you will get 'reaped'. That should provide a good incentive to improve oneself, and hence improve society. Independent thinking would develop as people self educated, critical thinking, useful thinking. Civilisation would soar higher on a bedrock of televised death.

      I would call this process 'centimation', the 100th's version of decimation.

    3. Re:Darwin Awards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That only works if it removes them prior to reproduction. Otherwise it's merely a tragedy..."

      This really isnt true, especially for males.

      A male who fathers 2 kids then walks off a cliff reading FB on his iPhone is at a serious evolutionary disadvantage to all the males of the same age who fathered the same number of children and lived to father more.

      The younger a male is when he dies, the more his genes are at an evolutionary disadvantage to other males whether he has already fathered children or not - surviving males can live and father children repeatedly well into old age.

      The same holds true to a lesser extent for females vis a vis other females, but females are far more limited in their ability to reproduce than males.

  24. The Solution Is Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need laws against "not paying attention", with severe penalties for non-compliance.

    And gun laws. We need more gun laws.

  25. If I were in the emergency room by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    I would love a visit from a distracted walking skyrocket. It would boost my spirits.

  26. Not a new problem by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    In the good old days, people had trouble walking while chewing gum.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    1. Re:Not a new problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > In the good old days, people had trouble walking while chewing gum.

      And while staring at titties!

      Distracted walking..? Why I never...OMG!

  27. Concert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you heard Distracted Walking Skyrocket in concert?

    (my mind had the similar confusion and I assumed that DWS was a band who is now visiting emergency rooms to make patients feel better)

  28. Reprint from News of the Weird by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 0

    I read the headline the same way-- a walking skyrocket went to the emergency room while distracted.

    I couldn't figure out what the heck this was about, but I figured it was a reprint from News of the Weird.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  29. Reprint from News of the Weird by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    I read the headline the same way-- a walking skyrocket went to the emergency room while distracted.

    I couldn't figure out what the heck this was about, but I figured it was a reprint from News of the Weird.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  30. This is not 'distraction'--- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no "distracted driving" or "distracted walking"-- there is NOT PAYING ANY DAMNED ATTENTION TO WHAT YOU'RE DOING!!

    These people are apparently too stupid to be allowed out on their own.

  31. Wow, a distracted walking skyrocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not exactly sure how a skyrocket walks (I'd expect them to be flying, especially in the afternoon - so exciting!), but still, that does sound like something that would send people to the emergency room if one were to be walking while distracted, yes.

    (Posting as anonymous coward because slashdot's login appears to be broken at the moment. >.>)

  32. Working as intended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Natural selection at work.

  33. Darwinism at work by p51d007 · · Score: 0

    I like the idea of REMOVING all warning labels, and letting nature, run its course. Would strengthen the gene pool eventually.

  34. Here is a solution by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Turn your camera on so you can see what is in front of you "through" your phone by making it "transparent"

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  35. Does this news please anyone else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome back natural selection you've been missed

    1. Re:Does this news please anyone else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like waiting in long lines at the hospital from all the teenagers getting concussions from taking selfies.

  36. Better solution by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Require camera operators to obtain a license.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  37. Google take heed by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    I hope the new version of Google Glass flashes a red warning icon to indicate the wearer is about to fall off a cliff

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  38. slashdot: snide joke to ignore the point? by whitroth · · Score: 1

    So, how many of you making the jokes about the walking skyrocket, who didn't understand it immediately, are reading this on your mobile device? Wonder if I can annoy you enough so that you walk into a wall while reading my post on a mobile....

    You're idiots. And I'm just waiting for the studies any time now showing an epidemic of carpal tunnel from thumb-typing on virtual keyboards.

                            mark "no idiot annoyaphone here"

  39. Maybe We Need A New Street Sign? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like this one?

    http://postimg.org/image/nzbtzmsu3/

  40. Evolution by mattwarden · · Score: 1

    Who says natural selection is dead

  41. Take away their licenses! by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    There should be a law!

    No, there shouldn't. The cell phone is still, historically speaking, quite new. People will figure out that it's not smart to walk around with your face in the phone. But being human, we all seem to have to figure it out individually.

    It wasn't so long ago when people would sit at restaurant tables talking out loud on their (dumb) phones, ignoring the people they were with. That trend has mostly gone away, replaced by people texting or playing video games at those same tables. It will wear off.

    1. Re:Take away their licenses! by Mishotaki · · Score: 1

      personally, I think that having a smartphone is stupid... why buy a device for hundreds of dollars and have a monthly payment for services for hundreds of dollars when you have to care for it because it's as strong as a pane of glass... when i can have a mobile phone for 30$ and a contract for 100$ a year to make important calls only and have the rest of my calls on a landline?

    2. Re:Take away their licenses! by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      You are clearly over 50!

    3. Re:Take away their licenses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Making phone calls is the least of the things I use my smartphone for. What do you call someone who looks at what other people do and calls them stupid simply because he can't understand the reasons that other people do things?

    4. Re:Take away their licenses! by dave420 · · Score: 1

      You are right - you can get a much cheaper phone for the grandkids to not call you on.

  42. No news is good news by bcware · · Score: 1

    The "no news is good news" phenomenon is a plague. So long as the action does not result in a sentinel event (e.g. a crash, getting pulled over, an injury, etc) the experience is piled into the positive outcomes category in the brain. Over time one becomes overconfident. This can be applied to many things like driving, driving and texting, texting and walking, etc. The way to break free from this cycle is through objective feedback. Watch this for about 5 minutes starting at 18:15 and apply it to everything you do: https://youtu.be/gN40ddfEkoQ?t... for full nerd points watch the entire thing.

  43. It hurts by MarkH · · Score: 1

    I am that dufus head who walked into Lampost.

  44. How many are from related assaults? by gatfirls · · Score: 1

    Or am I the only one that becomes slightly annoyed with people who meander around while texting oblivious to anything or anyone around them. It's like a randomly moving slalom course at the mall.