the issue with this trial though was the fact it was linked to a CCTV camera which took pictures of your face when you picked up some razors, and then compared the image with your face at the checkout. that's taking things too far too soon surely? if they introduced the tags for stock-taking and basic security first, and then introduced cctv use later on etc, perhaps people would be more willing.
perhaps the only way to solve spam is to go down the route of scrapping email as well know it and starting a new system from scratch that has solid anti-spam measures built in from the ground up. i believe such systems exist.
damn right we have separate accounts!:)
yeah, sometimes i'm going out and see wants cash out or vice versa. i'm sure we ain't the only people in the world to do it.
but i often go to the ATM for my wife, and vice-versa, with a pin number that is easy, but with face recognition i'd have to wear a mask and that'd be rather silly.
technology, love it or lose it (your job that is)
ah, of course! ( damn 20 seconds wait, how long does it take to type "ah, of course!" ? )
isn't the lesson here that people shouldn't go on vacation?
perhaps the only way to solve spam is to go down the route of scrapping email as well know it and starting a new system from scratch that has solid anti-spam measures built in from the ground up. i believe such systems exist.
damn right we have separate accounts! :)
yeah, sometimes i'm going out and see wants cash out or vice versa. i'm sure we ain't the only people in the world to do it.
but i often go to the ATM for my wife, and vice-versa, with a pin number that is easy, but with face recognition i'd have to wear a mask and that'd be rather silly.
but it's not cool technology because it doesn't work!
i was just going to say that! hopefully sco will be laughed out of court anyway (but that's a different discussion)
can i be the first to ask why? ah, no, not the first, but can i ask anyway?