Slashdot Mirror


SoBig: Worst is Yet to Come

bl8n8r writes "Experts say when vacationers get back to work Monday, Inboxes will unleash the worms worst attacks. Sunner said that most of the problems caused by SoBig involve the time and cost of cleaning the worm from computer systems. "

683 comments

  1. Finally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    They named a virus after my penis.

    1. Re:Finally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOOL!! parent deserves +5, Funny

    2. Re:Finally. by coffee_admin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Did your mom help you think of that comment?

      --
      Prozac makes the voices in my head say nice things to me.
    3. Re:Finally. by slavetrade55 · · Score: 1

      Thats even better than the original post. My kingdom for some mod points.

    4. Re:Finally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      They named a virus after my penis.

      No, child, it's a worm. That's why they named it after your penis.

    5. Re:Finally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You NAMED your penis?

    6. Re:Finally. by smatt-man · · Score: 2, Funny

      Must be an inch worm?

      --

      ---
      Lousy rotten karmic retribution.
    7. Re:Finally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No.. Taco named his penis.

      For some reason he named it 'Matilda.'

    8. Re:Finally. by uunh+haun · · Score: 1

      ouch!

    9. Re:Finally. by Oper+Sorcerer · · Score: 1

      Yeah! Hold your fingers about an inch apart and say ..."sobig"

      --

      karma: Marianas Trench (mostly blub blub)
    10. Re:Finally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hire a plumber. He installs a pipe that poisons your children. You sue him and rape his ass through court.

      You walk down the street, someone who bought a crap car with crap brakes runs down your children.
      You take that company to court for knowingly fitting shoddy brakes.

      So why the fuck when microfuckingsoft fills your inbox with 1750 spam emails because they cannot sanity check, and they think its fun to open a zillion fucking ports on a fucking machine and not secure them (finite number of ports, secure them all, viola)

      As far as I cam concerned, my PC wasnt infected but as I was affected through spam and network issues it is microsofts fault, they shoudl pay. How can M$ CHARGE for theirproducts when it COSTS business so much to use them anyway?

      FUCKING HELLLL

  2. Cost Benefit Analysis by Transient0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the majority of the cost comes from cleaning the system, I would recommend (in my professional opinion) simply letting the systems remain infected.

    1. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by jmv · · Score: 5, Funny

      Great idea! Do you have a degree at the Enron Institute of Business? :)

    2. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by kaan · · Score: 2

      While leaving the infected machines alone would thus eliminate the expense of cleaning them, it would not prevent the virus from freaking out and continuing to flood everyone with junk mail, right? There may not be a tangible, hard number correlating to the expenditure of time and annoyance by everyone who is affected (and annoyed) by the email flood, but that doesn't mean it's worth living with just because you can't put a number on it.

    3. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by borgdows · · Score: 3, Funny

      no, he has a degree at the SCO Institute of Business!

      why bother with computer viruses when the only thing you need is a big mouth and lawyers?

    4. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you work for the government, by any chance? :)

    5. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by stinkwinkerton · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm not sure if this should be +5 funny. It is a real option for some users.

      I have known many people that actually know they have a virus on their computer and don't make it the first priority in using their systems... if it is usable by them, they don't care.

      Of course, this sort of person doesn't have the slightest understanding (or care) that their system is causing a variety of problems on other systems.

      They only seem to care if it is causing THEM some problem.

      I've long since given up trying to explain what is going on to these folks or the urgency of solving their own virus problem in a timely manner. I make sure that their system is as up-to-date as possible and make sure their virus protection software automatically updates as frequently as possible.

      And, recently, these are the folks that I have broken my long standing rule on, and configured "Windows to update automatically" and not wait for the user to OK it.

      --
      "Look! There! Evil, pure and simple from the Eighth Dimension!" --Buckaroo Banzai
    6. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by BWJones · · Score: 4, Funny

      If the majority of the cost comes from cleaning the system, I would recommend (in my professional opinion) simply letting the systems remain infected.

      That's my plan. Just pull the plug on the Wintel stuff, toss em in the trash and replace them with Macs running OS X. :-)

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    7. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by TheOtherChimeraTwin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We've been lucky that these recent worms/viruses that have been basically harmless. (Heck, some here might argue that targeting windowsupdate.com was a good thing!) There has been a lot of side effects that have made them annoying, but no really nasty payloads that destroy people's data. I hope we learn some lessons before a truly evil worm is unleashed.

    8. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't help bandwidth issues when stupid ISPs ANET start sending out "**You may have a virus**" automated responses to the worm emails.

    9. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by BWJones · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's my plan. Just pull the plug on the Wintel stuff, toss em in the trash and replace them with Macs running OS X. :-)

      I was being a little glib there, but it should be pointed out that the labor costs associated with managing all of this crap are pretty serious. Overtime charges, benefits and basic salary for an $74k employee for the last three days are running what? At least $1000k per employee. With eight IT dudes running around fixing all of the Wintel systems that's eight grand worth of new Macs that will have much better uptime and lower costs just from the last three days alone. Now, consider how many of these little virus and worm issues there have been in the past year.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    10. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by jpsst34 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "...when the only thing you need is a big mouth and lawyers?"

      You need a big mouth to fit around it, 'cuz it's SoBig.F!

      --
      How are you going to keep them down on the farm once they've seen Karl Hungus?
    11. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by shepd · · Score: 5, Interesting

      >I've long since given up trying to explain what is going on to these folks or the urgency of solving their own virus problem in a timely manner.

      Try this one:

      "Some these viruses have been known to attmempt to destroy the computers of various military installations. The penalty in many countries for this is death. The penalty in YOUR country is a federal jail term. You may want to consider purchasing a $60 upgrade to your computer to help you avoid this problem in the future."

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    12. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the extra karma when...

    13. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by McAddress · · Score: 1

      It's windows, it already is infected to begin with.

    14. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... I reply to my own post!

    15. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by McAddress · · Score: 1

      and eradicting this virus will get rid of junk mail?
      sigh.. if it were only that easy .....

    16. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by tds67 · · Score: 1
      If the majority of the cost comes from cleaning the system, I would recommend (in my professional opinion) simply letting the systems remain infected.

      Wouldn't it be great if physicians had that same attitude toward patients with bacterial infections?

      "Sorry, Mr. Smith, but the cost of clearing up your tetanus infection is too great; I recommend leaving you infected."

    17. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      There are lots of cases where the cure is worse than the disease, so to speak, and doctors leave it under observation.

      I mean they dont just chuck everyone into kimotherapy or surgery at the first sign of cancer.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    18. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Electrum · · Score: 5, Interesting

      With eight IT dudes running around fixing all of the Wintel systems

      No "IT dudes" worth anything will be "running around fixing" things. If they had done their job properly in the first place, they wouldn't have to fix anything at all.

    19. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by whoever57 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have known many people that actually know they have a virus on their computer and don't make it the first priority in using their systems... if it is usable by them, they don't care.

      Could it be that they are planning to use the "virus downloaded the pr0n/mp3/..." defense should they ever be challenged about exactly what is on their computer?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    20. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Vacationers?

      What vacation or holiday is this...?!

    21. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Otter · · Score: 3, Funny

      Naw, he's thinking too small. A few years ago, dot-coms would have come up with a way to book viruses as some form of asset -- maybe as a proprietary database of Internet users? -- and used it as the foundation of a succesful IPO.

    22. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's teaching us a lesson by adding additional, and never-ending, cruft to the backbone internet. You do realize that things like MSBlaster will never be eliminated from the net at large don't you? I mean for fucks sake, people still see code-red probes on their web servers. Like we need another fucking worm sending packets willy-nilly across the internet.

    23. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by jafac · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, just look at how the human race has handled HIV infection.

      In order to make sure big pharmaceutical company CEOs can keep adding to their personal antique sports car collections, we allow the virus to multiply and infect millions daily.

      Instead of carpet bombing the 3rd world with free condoms and cheap generic drugs. But that's no profitable.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    24. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you apple loving, jobs's anus sniffing asshole.. i am coming after you ..i know where you are BWJones !

    25. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by DrinkDr.Pepper · · Score: 1

      LOL!

      I knew someone whose computer told him every time he rebooted that he had a W32.CIH variant. Everything seemed to work as before, so he did nothing about it. He didn't even read the virus's profile. On the 26th he had no more computer!

      --
      0xfeedface
    26. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 3, Funny

      Shouldn't that be "So F. Big"?

    27. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by EverDense · · Score: 5, Funny

      Try this one:

      "Some these viruses have been known to attmempt to destroy the computers of various military installations. The penalty in many countries for this is death. The penalty in YOUR country is a federal jail term. You may want to consider purchasing a $60 upgrade to your computer to help you avoid this problem in the future."


      Thank God!

      They've FINALLY started jailing people for being too stupid to own computers! ;-)

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
    28. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Frymaster · · Score: 4, Insightful
      f they had done their job properly in the first place, they wouldn't have to fix anything at all.

      does "doing their job properly" include preventing end-users from touching the keyboards? let's face it, the network that remains unused always stays in a stable, functioning state. put users on it and then things go wrong.

    29. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by FedeTXF · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, condoms and generic drugs...

      Education is cheaper (in the long run) and it's even useful for other stuff, too.

    30. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Biff+Stu · · Score: 1

      That sounds like my HMO!

    31. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously -- this is a 2 year old virus that could be stopped with simple mail filtering.

      If any you IT drones out there got infected on your watch, you should resign out of shame.

    32. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by paranoic · · Score: 4, Funny
      This is slashdot, shouldn't

      You may want to consider purchasing a $60 upgrade to your computer to help you avoid this problem in the future.


      read

      You may want to consider installing Linux on your computer to help you avoid this problem in the future.


    33. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by GoRK · · Score: 4, Funny

      If I get someone who doesnt care, I just tell them the virus e-mails, at random, their web history and any files/photos/etc. it can find on the hard drive to any address it can find in the e-mail application.

      This works suprisingly well. Even though it's a lie, they are spooked about it. If they pester me, I'll tell them the truth but add that viruses in the past have done this and probably will do it again.

    34. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Natty+P · · Score: 5, Funny

      This should be Microsoft's next big marketing campaign!

      I'm sure it'll be more successful than .NET or that stupid WinXP commercial with the Madonna song and people flying around....

      "Where do you want to go today?!?! Federal prison?!?! If not, upgrade now!"

    35. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by mfrank · · Score: 1

      It's even cheaper to tell them to not have sex with prostitutes or they'll die.

      Of course, on slashdot people are used to going without sex for very long durations.

    36. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Kevin+DeGraaf · · Score: 1

      Overtime charges, benefits and basic salary for an $74k employee for the last three days are running what? At least $1000k per employee. With eight IT dudes running around fixing all of the Wintel systems

      Please, please, tell me where I can find a $74K job "running around fixing [..] Wintel systems."

      Come to think of it, tell me where I can find a $25K job doing same, and I will buy you a very large case of your favorite beverage.

      --
      We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked.
    37. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't that be a $600.00 upgrade (don't forget the SCO tax!)

    38. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Overtime charges, benefits and basic salary for an $74k employee for the last three days are running what? At least $1000k per employee

      simple solution... put all your IT staff on salary and screw them on overtime...

      salary pay does not get paid overtime.

      Works great and is the american way! at least in Philidelphia it is!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    39. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll clean the computers and you can leave it at 20% off. 74k employee? Sheesh. I know that the people in my IT dept don't make that kind of cash. I certainly don't, and I am product developer.

      Obviously there will be some additonal costs to salary, but 74k for IT seems ridiculous.

      Warper

      ps. just joking on the cleaning up part, the plane ticket would be too expensive, and the job would be finished too soon for the payments to kick in.

    40. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually they only do that to people who can't spell the name of the city that they live in.

    41. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Verteiron · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the USA, salaried employees are still entitled to overtime pay. Even if it said they were not in their contract. Federal wage law overrules corporate contracts.

      Only "exempt" employees can work overtime without being paid for it, and there are minimum salary requirements for most professions to have "exempt" status.

      For technical work it's along the lines of $27/hour.

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    42. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nice when the boss gives you enough money to work with in the budget, but not all small businesses do that. A former employer told me to install antivirus software on our 60+ PCs, only to change his mind when I told him it would cost. Was that my fault?

    43. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by JCMay · · Score: 1

      I think you mean chemotherapy , since kimotherapy isn't a word.

    44. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by temojen · · Score: 1

      Some of them do do this. I have a lovely collection of compromising files from a couple of years ago when one of them was doing this...

      It includes ongoing contract negotiations, Protest plans, a huge amount of porn, random spacer/layout gifs from someone's web cache, financial details, etc.

    45. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by jonbrewer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No "IT dudes" worth anything will be "running around fixing" things. If they had done their job properly in the first place, they wouldn't have to fix anything at all.

      I don't know what world you're living in, but it isn't the one I'm posting from. You can be a brilliant IT guy who does his job incredibly well, but if a corporation's policies (i.e. waiting until a patch has been regression tested with bespoke applications) have you running around fixing things, it's the CIO that's not "worth anything" and not the "IT dudes".

      And, of course, in the case where you're paid $74k/year (as the parent post mentioned), You Do What You're Told, or you quickly lose said salary.

    46. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by cryptochrome · · Score: 1

      Amen. I presume sobig is the one flooding my mailbox with multiple infected messages per hour. Thank goodness I have a mac so it doesn't affect me or my friends. Thank goodness for Mail.app's bayesian filtering so I don't even have to look at it anymore, and to my ISP for marking them all so consistently.

      --

      ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    47. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by mekkab · · Score: 4, Funny

      ... that's eight grand worth of new Macs ...

      Yeah, and just think what both of those machines could do!

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    48. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Forgotten · · Score: 1

      I actually wonder when we'll get to the point where this is the only reasonable course. In the epilogue to the Marathon series, the rampant A.I. Leela infects a multi-planetary network, and the race using it resigns themselves to the fact that they'll never be able to get her out so they'll just have to live with her there.

      At some point there'll be malware running worldwide that it just won't make economic sense to remove. In a sense that's already the case - computers are pretty unreliable anyway, and happy malware just makes them somewhat less so. You can try and root it all out, or just overdesign so that you can live with it. That seems a direction we've already begun moving in.

    49. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      You can get $50K CND (~$35K USD) working helpdesk for the Canadian government. All you need is 2 years of post-secondary education, plus experience providing support for Windows systems in a corporate environment. And judging by some of the people in those jobs, compatence ISN'T a requirement :D
      "Sure, we just upgrade to XP, all of your settings and data will be the same. *FORMAT* Oh I meant your desktop settings and all the data on your network drive, not anything on your computer. Sorry"

      I'd post links to the Notices of Competition, but apparently jobs.gc.ca is down :(

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    50. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a friend in college with a Win3.1 box (this is around 1999 mind you) which he said was full of viruses. The funny thing was that all the viruses he caught seemed to be made for 95/98 and didn't actually WORK on win3.1 - so he left them alone.

    51. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      With eight IT dudes running around fixing all of the Wintel systems that's eight grand worth of new Macs that will have much better uptime and lower costs just from the last three days alone.

      So you just bought 3 new Macs. What about the other 2997 Windows systems?

    52. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The poster meant "kibotherapy", which also isn't.

    53. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Ahhh ok, I am corrected...

      simply set them as Exempt.. and screw them...

      BTW exempt status starts at $19.00 an hour.... nice of the Govt to lower that back in 1999 :-)

      I know... I'm making $20.00 now. and guess what. I'm exempt!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    54. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

      Most home users aren't smart enough to think of that.

    55. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by sharkey · · Score: 1
      If they had done their job properly in the first place, they wouldn't have to fix anything at all.

      Because they would already be running on OSX?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    56. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by festers · · Score: 1

      Amen to that.
      Number of PCs I support: 200
      Amount of time I've spent fixing "virus" problems during the last two weeks: 0 minutes.

      All our machines were patched long ago, and the firewall/exchange server AV catches everything else.

      --


      -------
      "Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief."
    57. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but I have a degree from Hollywood Upstairs Medical College.

    58. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by SeaGK · · Score: 1

      Actually NO, everybody has said this before, You do not apply a patch without testing it really well before. It doesn't matter if it comes from MicroSoft.

      At work we had a problem with some users (Win9x and power users on 2K) auto updating to the latest Acrobat Reader 6.0. As a result they broke a semi-critical third party application that relied on some obscure functionality from Acrobat 5.0, so yes,we had all IT staff running aroud "fixing" (read downgrading) computers, and don't tell me that every major company knows every last technical detail about their off the shelve apps.

    59. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Nunar · · Score: 1

      Insurance companies already do that.

      "My mom says I'm the most handsome kid in school" - Milhouse

    60. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by b!arg · · Score: 1

      I think it may be state to state, much like minimum wage. Or rather, there is a federal level but a state can change it if they want (only to a higher number though). I believe Washington State is at the $27 level as mentioned before. I worked at a smaller company and was labelled exempt. I made over $20/hr but under $27/hr. When they got around to hiring an HR person as they grew in size, she noticed this and immediately changed me back to non-exempt. WA state also has a much higher minimum wage and it increases annually, not just when approved, I think.

      --

      Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
    61. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No "IT dudes" worth anything will be "running around fixing" things. If they had done their job properly in the first place, they wouldn't have to fix anything at all.

      So according to your logic, if a company hires IT guys that set up everything perfectly they should be able to fire them after a couple days and never have to deal with the technical infrastructure again.

    62. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by andy@petdance.com · · Score: 1

      Maybe he meant "kibotherapy".

    63. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by dildofire · · Score: 2, Informative

      i'm not sure what exactly for, but france and italy (and probably other european countries) basically shut down for the second part of august and a ton of people go on vacation. that's my only guess as to what it could mean.

    64. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by cmallinson · · Score: 1
      I mean they dont just chuck everyone into kimotherapy or surgery at the first sign of cancer.

      Actually, that exactly when they throw you into chemo or surgery.

    65. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by SoSueMe · · Score: 1
      No SH!T.

      At our workplace, we will be installing this patch AFTER September 24th!!!
      No bother that a patch that superceeds it was released yesterday.
      from the update site
      Cumulative Patch for Internet Explorer (818529)

      Originally posted: June 4, 2003
      Summary

      Who should read this bulletin: Customers using Microsoft(R) Internet Explorer

      Impact of vulnerability: Allow an attacker to execute code on a user's system

      Maximum Severity Rating: Critical

      Recommendation: System administrators should install the patch immediately

      End User Bulletin: An end user version of this bulletin is available at:

      http://www.microsoft.com/security/security_bulleti ns/ms03-020.asp.
    66. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by jhoffoss · · Score: 1

      Of course! We can pretend it's like Hepatitis. Once you get it, you're stuck with it. At least you can get infected by it again. Of course you could get another strain of it at the same time... Viruses like this are the ONLY thing that make me glad I use and support GroupWise at work. Of course, we still have the idiot employees who open every email and every attachment they receive in case it's something cool. I had a guy open an email that was infected with another virus on TEN different computers in a half-hour because he thought it was really important and it wouldn't open on any of them. I was two inches from blowing a gasket with that one.

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
    67. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by jhoffoss · · Score: 1
      You may want to consider purchasing a $60 upgrade to your computer to help you avoid this problem in the future.
      But Linux is free! :)
      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
    68. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by jhoffoss · · Score: 1
      You may want to consider purchasing a $60 upgrade to your computer to help you avoid this problem in the future.

      But Linux is free! :)

      Shit. I forgot about the SCO license now. What is the world to do now?? *BSD?
      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
    69. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by festers · · Score: 1

      Any remote root patch that doesn't get installed in a timely matter is the fault of the IT "dudes." The head IT "dude" needs to be convinced that the risk of patching far outweighs the costs that come with cleaning up a virus/worm. The "I can only do what I'm told" excuse doesn't cut it, you're just not being creative in discussions with the boss. Show him/her the hard numbers and if they are still too stupid to listen, take it to the next level. If the company has any business smarts, someone will listen to your well reasoned arguements. If not, you may want to start looking for a new job, that company probably won't be in business for long.

      --


      -------
      "Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief."
    70. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by jhoffoss · · Score: 1

      We had auto-updates set up on every one of our PCs. Of both our anti-virus software and XP. On every PC I've had to remove these viruses from, either one or both have been disabled. In some cases, the user uninstalled the anti-virus software altogether. Granted, they should never have had permission to do something so stupid, but that err lies on the head of our system engineers, not the lowly support analysts (me).

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
    71. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by whovian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the users who aren't paying attention to viruses make it that much harder for those users who do. These users make it possible to leverage the idea of giving away remote root access, effectively. What's to stop Microsoft from bundling a program with this feature with, say, behind/within a whole layer of digital rights management? DRM coming to reality makes it hard for non-Microsoft computer users then.

      So basically, MS gets control because users let it be so. Or am I way off on this?

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    72. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by festers · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference between upgrading an application and applying a patch that prevents a system-wide exploit. I'm all for testing , and it's a policy at my bank, but applications gets tested far longer than critical patches do.

      --


      -------
      "Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief."
    73. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by gorfie · · Score: 1

      And then there are 8 IT dudes running around unable to find a job and becoming a burden on society. Why don't we just dump computers alltogether and ship all of the computing tasks off to India?

    74. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by HiThere · · Score: 1

      That's how we stopped it. But MS patches...shudder.

      A recent MS patch made our MS based DNS stop talking to Macs. (Fortunately we had another running on a different OS. So we just needed to switch them over.)

      Now I, personally, don't understand why in the world we are trusting MS with something like a DNS, but appearantly there's some software that turned out to require MS W2000 as a server. (Of course, my feeling is that any such software should be returned immediately as unuseable, but I don't make those decisions.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    75. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Nope I was wrong....

      here's the excerpt from the feds....

      Professional

      P1:
      Professional short test 27, and 28 Science or learning (includes doctor, lawyer)

      P2:
      Professional short test 27 and 29 Teacher

      P3:
      Professional short test 27 and 30 Artist

      27
      Salary of $250/$200 a week or more
      Work requiring knowledge of an advanced type in a field of science or learning,

      OR work as a teacher in an activity of imparting knowledge which requires consistent exercise of discretion and judgment OR

      Primary duty is artistic work that requires invention, imagination, or talent in a recognized field of artistic endeavor

      Predominantly intellectual and varied in character

      It's as low as that.

      and that is easy to fit any IT employee to.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    76. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by linzeal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We had a guy in marketing spamming child porn to the company's customers and some people in the company. When he logged in at 6:00 am my time on the road one day when I was working graveyard shift. Needless to say he did not ever leave Illinois as far as I know.

    77. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Giving people in marketing admin rights is like giving people in IT a gun, someone or something is going to get hurt.

    78. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by kruczkowski · · Score: 1

      Not many people know this but the DoD bought a site licence for every family member and site computer of Norton AV. That's right, you can download the free version and take it home it install it on your computer.

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    79. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's the biggest load of crap this side of the milky way.

      microsoft is IN THE BUSINESS of selling software that can be run by monkeys.

      you are a fucking rotten snatch if you believe for one second that the majority of companies out there have real "IT dudes".

      the GOOD companies have paper MCSEs.

      the rest have shit on a shinola.

      and that's exactly why these worms and other stuff are devastating the crap out of corporate networks.

      you are worse then that fucking dumbass on IRAQI television.

      "there are no American's in IRAQ"

      "No 'IT dudes' worth any" SNIPPPPP

      you are in complete denial of reality.

      come back from wonderland alice!

    80. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Basehart · · Score: 1

      On a hunch I just looked up F. Gibos in the phone book but the closest I saw was a Mr. F. Gibosi, 16 Virus St., Hackertown, NJ. Could this be the mastermind behind the SoBig.F virus I wonder?!

    81. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by andrewski · · Score: 2, Funny

      I had a guy open an email that was infected with another virus on TEN different computers in a half-hour because he thought it was really important and it wouldn't open on any of them.

      In this case a normal LART is not enough. Whichever LART you choose should be painful, debilitating, and memorable. A .357 magnum to the pelvis is a good one, or an arm in the chipper / shredder (preferably their mouse arm) would demonstarte the point nicely. Some may prefer to apply LSD and then strap the Luser down and force him or her to watch the live action Popeye starring Robin Williams 10 times in a row, along with a forehead tattoo that reads 'criminally incompetent'.

    82. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      You haven't read my jounal, have you?

    83. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Electrum · · Score: 1

      does "doing their job properly" include preventing end-users from touching the keyboards?

      End users in most environments should not have the privileges that would allow them to infect themselves. Windows machines can be secured while still allowing users to get work done. Doing so requires a competent administrator.

    84. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently the ability to spell isn't required either...

    85. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by yo5oy · · Score: 1

      so now you have two macintosh g4 computers. that would entail hiring another employee at whatever rate ($73K? I know macintosh os 9 and osx really well) to administer this macintosh contingent. what about the software for these macs?

      --
      a slut did tulsa
    86. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Huk · · Score: 1

      We IT dudes are all salaried and aren't making overtime. I was out for two weeks, came back to this and spent 15 minutes getting into the RSM on the cat 5500, wrote a quick acl, then spent 14 hours tracking down errant win2k boxes that weren't patched and weren't supposed to be on the network in the first place. Thank you to our division software engineers.

    87. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Huk · · Score: 1

      i'm also effing stupid, i'm reading about sobig and thinking about blaster/nachi

    88. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>... that's eight grand worth of new Macs ...

      Yeah, and just think what both of those machines could do!>>

      Not much... You'd have to but them used!

    89. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it wasn't for my horse...

      I'd of never spent that year in college.

    90. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by saturndude · · Score: 2

      My ISP, ZoomTown (Cincinnati Bell) is planning to block users found to be infected starting Friday, 08/22. If they block you, you can only visit half a dozen anti-virus sites (and no e-mailing) until you clean up your act.

      Inconsiderate users don't mind causing other people problems, but when they can't surf and have no e-mail anymore, it will get their attention and make them reconsider.

      Any other ISPs doing this?

    91. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      Reality check.

      - VPN through a firewall with a personal virused computer
      - Plug in same said laptop inside network
      - have 400 computers in 5 buildings vs one sys admin with a $10,000 annual budget
      - have a non-homogenous network where people need full rights to their own machines (not that the worms care who's using the computer)

      We don't all work in neat little firms with level 1 tech support running around while "competent" administrators run nmap and point their lackeys in the right direction.

    92. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by plover · · Score: 2
      I'd consider it irresponsible if they didn't.

      My company has an email policy that I wonder if it wouldn't go a long way in the ISP sector: they remove every executable attachment and replace it with a text file saying "no executable attachments." Period. Ends with a .EXE, .PIF, .COM, .DLL, .OCX, .VBS, whatever, they don't care, they delete it. MIME-type == executable? Delete it. They do at least virus-scan it before tossing it in the bit bucket, and let the text file reflect it with a polite variant of "The file was removed 'cause it had a FREAKIN' VIRUS, you idiot, quit trying to open it!"

      At first I thought it was the typical stupid draconian corporate policy, but I've grown to appreciate it more and more. If someone really feels the need to send an .EXE, they'll rename it to something like FOO_EXE.TXT. If a vendor sends us an .EXE that gets stripped, we just ask for it again, renamed. It keeps us from getting stuff that might otherwise have been shipped by accident (or a virus), and it keeps the real lusers from launching stupid viruses behind the firewall on a daily basis. And this latest round of SOBIG is using the old "Returned undeliverable email" trick, which is bound to hit the idiots even harder.

      --
      John
    93. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by plover · · Score: 2, Informative
      And today I found two of sixty machines using "autoupdate" that suffered from corrupted cryptographic services such that they were unable to install the Microsoft patches. They silently failed to protect those machines. (Oh, sure, the users could have gone into event viewer and seen the failures. That's certainly what my coworkers do after every autoupdate.) The corruption appeared to have caused the antivirus auto-updates to fail as well.

      I also had another guy whose NT 4.0 box was rendered completely unbootable by the official patch. His only recourse was to upgrade the box to XP (the upgrade process managed to recover his old settings.)

      So don't tell me the "wonders" of autoupdate and how perfect your life is because of it. It's Microsoft software. Nowhere in the EULA do they claim it's going to work right. It may reduce your workload, it may keep some bad things from happening, but don't ever make the mistake of trusting it to always do so.

      --
      John
    94. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by SethJohnson · · Score: 0


      I agree fully with your analysis of who is in charge / responsible / etc.

      When you said 'You Do WHat You're Told' I started reminiscing... In those situations where I had a job where I Did What I Was Told, I rarely 'ran around' fixing things. I pretty much walked slowly and quielty explained to people I was doing what I was told. Those firemen who ran into the World Trade Center weren't doing what they were told. They ran in there because they believed in what they were doing and were motivated by the urgent need to rescue people. On the other side of the spectrum, if I'm having to clean up somebody's turds because three other idiots involved in the chain of command don't know how a toilet works (note sarcastic metaphor for Windows OS and feel free to use it GPL-style) I am hardly going to be able to muster up the energy to "run around".

      I'm not really disagreeing with anything you're saying here. Just sort of inspired to reminisce in public...
    95. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by legojenn · · Score: 2, Informative
      I shared a PC with my roommate for a while. I booted in Linux (except for games) and she booted up in XP. I set the default mail & browser clients to Mozilla, she would change them to IE & OE.

      She would get annoyed when she changed it back as she was more accustomed to OE for mail. She eventually got a virus and an email that she sent to an ex boyfriend got to her family, friends, neighbours, me, her son, maybe her current boyfriend......

      When it was explained that she did it to herself and that with Mozilla, it probably would have not happened, (with Linux it would have definitely not have happened), she became a happy Mozilla user.

      Sometimes, it just takes getting burned to get people to stop playing with OL & OE.

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    96. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by patrixx · · Score: 1

      If you could be told what software to use, then it follows that you could be told how much to pay for it. - MS

    97. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, as this is Slashdot, it should read

      You may wish to download a <cough> version of Norton AntiVirus found on filesearching.com to help you avoid this problem in the future.

    98. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Show him/her the hard numbers and if they are still too stupid to listen, take it to the next level. If the company has any business smarts, someone will listen to your well reasoned arguements. If not, you may want to start looking for a new job, that company probably won't be in business for long.

      Well, I "took it to the next level" and suddenly I lost my $85k/year (yeah, that's US Dollars) job because I had improperly stored my bicycle in my office. No other reason mentioned, no bad reviews, no warnings, nothing. And it was perfectly legal because I (as all my former colleagues in this 30bn/year company) was an "at-will" employee.

      And I don't think they're going out of business soon.

    99. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "You may want to consider purchasing a $60 upgrade ...
      You may want to consider installing Linux
      "

      $60 isn't such a bad estimate

    100. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Jim+Nugent · · Score: 1

      If the majority of the cost comes from cleaning the system, I would recommend (in my professional opinion) simply letting the systems remain infected.

      I see where you're coming from but....

      First, Your ISP will track you down and hurt you. I remember going through this with Klez. I used to ferret out the originating IP and cotact the owner of the IP block. (I had a lot more time on my hands then...) They were usually very appreciative and promised to contact the subscriber with the message "Clean up your system or get kicked of the Net."

      Second, if you're a large corporation and run an internal email system like MS Exchange, it will gag and choke until it dies. The internal email teams at big corps HATE these things.

      Almost as much as they hate the idiot^H^H^H^H^Hemployees who OPEN THE ATTACHMENTS.

    101. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is because no matter how "square" the person is, everyone has some pr0n or has visited a pr0n site using their computer no matter how well they try to hide it....

    102. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      Where I used to work at they did that, but they let zip files thru, so we used to just zip anything we needed to send each other if it ever came up..

    103. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by mpe · · Score: 2, Informative

      End users in most environments should not have the privileges that would allow them to infect themselves. Windows machines can be secured while still allowing users to get work done. Doing so requires a competent administrator.

      It depends what they are required to run. There is plenty of Windows software around where giving the user privs is the easiest way to get it to work. Possibly even the only thing the vendor recommends.

    104. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by mpe · · Score: 1

      Any remote root patch that doesn't get installed in a timely matter is the fault of the IT "dudes." The head IT "dude" needs to be convinced that the risk of patching far outweighs the costs that come with cleaning up a virus/worm.

      There is also a risk that applying the patch could break something, this also needs to be considered.

    105. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by size1one · · Score: 1

      I have known many people that actually know they have a virus on their computer and don't make it the first priority in using their systems...

      We have virii that patch our systems now, why would I want to get rid of them?

    106. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by !Freeky2BGeeky · · Score: 0
      Try this, unplug the offending users PC from the network. When they complain that they can't access any of the systems they need to, explain to them that thier machine was causing network slowdowns and that, by unplugging the PC from the net, the overall performance has gone back up and YOUR systems are now working just fine.

      Then tell them you'll allow them back on when they fix the virus on their system.

      --

      Visualize Whirled Peas

    107. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Walrus99 · · Score: 0

      I've been the IT specialist for a government organization for five years. All our computers are Macs. In those five years we have never gotten a virus that has caused one day of lost productivity. I have lost work time however posting messages to Slashdot bragging about this every time another e-mail worm or virus hits.

      Cringely just had a column on the cost benefit of using Macs: I Cringely

    108. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, you're right. if there is no real impact, then of course you should spend all available resources chasing a phantom problem. Especially since the worm will de-activate itself before half the population even bothers to update their virus definitions...

      Seems pretty clear to me who attended the Enron Institute of Business.

      If there is no impact, why chase it? So you can whine and cry about shoddy MS Security causing you headaches at work?

    109. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by jhoffoss · · Score: 1
      No, but dealing with ten out of 550 PCs (say) would not be as bad as dealing with 100+ out of 550. This has been the case here, and it's going to get worse when students bring their infected PCs back to campus in a week. I just hope our NetOps people have their ducks in a row to keep the impact to a minimum.

      Besides, we have at least one user every week that destroys his or her workstation completely. Not that this is okay, or makes auto-updates okay...

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
    110. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by mfrank · · Score: 1

      Giving out free drugs won't help; if not used correctly, and if behaviours don't change, all it'll accomplish is create strains of virus resistant to the drugs. Many doctors in the US won't prescribe HIV drugs to patients, even ones fully insured, if they think they'll continue to engage in risky behaviour.

      Somewhat similar to the people in western countries who'll demand to be given antibiotics when they have viral infections; the result is antibiotic resistant bacteria.

      Or are you under the impression that the human race has ever actually come up with a *cure* for a viral disease?

    111. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Did you mean to reply to me? I don't understand the connection.

    112. Re:Cost Benefit Analysis by mfrank · · Score: 1

      Sorry, thought you were the person I was replying to.

  3. Worms worms and more worms by Lane.exe · · Score: 5, Funny
    Is 2003 the year of the Worm on the Chinese calendar? I'm confused!

    --
    IAALS.
    1. Re:Worms worms and more worms by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 1

      If so, then truly:

      Hacked by Chinese!

  4. No Kidding.... by Cyclopedian · · Score: 1, Redundant

    The past 3 days, I've had over 300 Sobig.F messages in my Junk folder (filtered by Mozilla Mail). Other co-workers with Eudora are less fortunate, since they spend better than an hour clearing out all those emails.

    -Cyc

    1. Re:No Kidding.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      01001001 01110100 00100111 0111001101000111 01001110 01010101 00101111 0100110001101001 01101110011101010111100000100001

      OMFG!!! Even his sig is infected!

    2. Re:No Kidding.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      hey, Slashbot moderators...

      Why wasn't this post modded insightful or informative. We have to let the world know how great it is to have Mozilla and not use Eudora or Outlook!

      Get to work.

    3. Re:No Kidding.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mozilla blows. Get a life.

    4. Re:No Kidding.... by jdunlevy · · Score: 1
      Other co-workers with Eudora are less fortunate, since they spend better than an hour clearing out all those emails.

      The Eudora users might want to consider Spamnix. (Or why not just filter on e-mail body contains "Please see the attached file for details"? For that matter, maybe AND any header contains "X-MS")

      Better yet kill MS-executable attachments on the mail server -- before the mail client even sees them.

    5. Re:No Kidding.... by joeykiller · · Score: 1
      Other co-workers with Eudora are less fortunate, since they spend better than an hour clearing out all those emails.

      If this is the case, then I strongly suggest that your co-workers upgrade to Eudora 6.0, even though it's still a beta. It got a powerful bayesian junk function, similar to Apple's Mail.app and Mozilla 1.4 Mail. It works beautifully and I've stopped using SpamAssassin since I installed 6.0 beta. The best part is that the beta version is rock solid. It hasn't crashed on me once.
    6. Re:No Kidding.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So do you. Is it worth the extra cash?

    7. Re:No Kidding.... by plover · · Score: 1
      Better yet kill MS-executable attachments on the mail server -- before the mail client even sees them.

      That's our corporate policy. And you know what? IT IS BETTER. Who the hell needs to email executables? "Hey, open this stupid greeting card, it's cute and has dancing puppies n shit!" Better to delete the attachments completely than to actually watch that crap and then have to go off and strangle the moron who sent it to you. Less prison time, anyway.

      --
      John
  5. What a relief.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm so glad that my computer is running Windows 2003, no viruses can affect this system since Microsoft's promise to completely make it secure. ... ...... .. DOH!

    1. Re:What a relief.. by borgdows · · Score: 1

      sorry...

      http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/defaul t. asp?url=/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-032.asp

  6. Is not a problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's an open source business model!

    1: Write free software.
    2: ?
    3: Get inbox filled with worms and viruses.
    4: Profit!

    1. Re:Is not a problem... by McAddress · · Score: 1
      Actually, its even simpler algorithm.

      1:Write free software
      2:Don't get inbox filled with worms and viruses
      3:?
      4:Profit!

  7. Skeptical by Urthpaw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This article claims that time wasted will cost businesses tens on millions of dollars. It seems to me that no matter how much spam/virus flooding/crap you get in your inbox, you only do so much work everyday. If you take five extra minutes to clean out your inbox, that's five minutes less of surfing slashdot or screwing around. Deadlines don't change for viruses-- people still have to work as much real work as ever.

    1. Re:Skeptical by garcia · · Score: 1

      it also claims that there are a ton of people on vacation? Is there some strange statistic that people go on more vacations this week than any other week in the summer?

      I always thought that Memorial Day, July 4th, and Labor Day were the hot weeks to go on vacation.

      I didn't notice any real change in the normal amounts of traffic this week over any other week. Where did they get this info from?

    2. Re:Skeptical by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      If you take five extra minutes to clean out your inbox, that's five minutes less of surfing slashdot or screwing around.

      Which ultimately takes its toll on the quality of your work, just like any other increase in the pressure level.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    3. Re:Skeptical by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      In my company (the US arm of a Swedish firm), August is big for vacations, particularly for the Swedes. There are some people that take up to 6 continuous weeks of vacation, from mid-July through all of August...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    4. Re:Skeptical by mcj · · Score: 1

      At my workplace (50k or so, 99% of which are idiots), I've only been able to connect to my e-mail server twice in the last 2 days due to network traffic and server load. That is definitely causing problems, and I know of 3 projects that have been delayed because of it (inability to move around testing data and such). Yes, if they were not idiots, they'd use FTP and so on, but if they were not idiots, the worms wouldn't be a problem in the first place.

      I don't know if that translates into millions of dollars, but whatever - it's a pain in the ass and is causing real delays.

    5. Re:Skeptical by NexusTw1n · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It depends on how clueless your email admins are.

      Rather than blocking .scr/Pif/.exe and deleting any email with such an attachment, they are letting the group virus scanner on our exchange servers deal with the entire load.

      So the virus scanner is scanning and moving to the infected folder literally thousands of these an hour. After it moves the infected message, it generates a nice email letting you know an email that was sent to you is currently in quarantine. Therefore this is generating even more work for the mail servers. Turning off this feature for a couple of days is apparently too much trouble.

      The servers exchange is running on are therefore hanging every few minutes with all the disk and processor activity. Everyone gets a message every few minutes about "please wait, connecting to server" until you get fed up and close outlook down for the day.

      This is the first virus I've ever seen to disrupt my work like this. But this is 100% the fault of our email admins who can't be bothered to write a couple of simple mail rules.

      At the basic internet security zone Outlook can't even open .scr and .exe attachments, so why they don't delete this crap before it hits the servers I don't know.

      --
      It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity. --Albert Einstein
    6. Re:Skeptical by danaedwards · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's why August is often referred to as "lazy Swede month".

    7. Re:Skeptical by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      In my company (the US arm of a Swedish firm), August is big for vacations, particularly for the Swedes.

      The same is true in Germany. Plus, many people in the US will take the last couple weeks of August through Labor day this year (since Labor day is 1-Sep).

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    8. Re:Skeptical by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1
      August is a huge vacation month, at least in Michigan. A third of my department is on vacation this week.

      It's the last push before the school year starts, it's at a time the businesses are well into their fiscal years and can spare employees, etc.

    9. Re:Skeptical by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1

      Well, all things considered, Bobs, I figure I do a solid 15 minutes or so of real work a day...

    10. Re:Skeptical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are assuming that the "admin" knows how to block .scr/Pif/.exe etc. Unfortunatly there are many so called Exchange Admins' who's only knolage of Exchange is how to setup a new user's box. The company I work for, installs Exchange servers for clients, and give a little training to someone on their staff (i.e. here is how to create a new box). Beyond that, they pay us by the hour, most dont bother until the machine starts to smoke...

    11. Re:Skeptical by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's basically a month filled with vacations for those in Europe. I don't know why this is but it seems to make as much sense as our spreading them out over the year. Thier businesses run on a skeleton staff or just close for most of the month, from what I've heard. Any industry that is closly related to Europe will probably want to run a little light this month. Finance also seems to take a vacation during the month, I don't know of other regions or industries.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    12. Re:Skeptical by ipjohnson · · Score: 1

      You know what one person isn't bad but when your whole facility (NASA research center in langley as well as the contractors and the airforce base) has its internet connectivity cut off as ours was part of monday, all of tuesday, and part of wednesday. It becomes very expensive.

    13. Re:Skeptical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blocking mail or attachments based on nothing more than the file extension of the attachment is dumb. There. Now I've said it.

      If it matches a known virus signature or even a known virus complete filename, by all means, delete it. If the file just ends with the wrong three letters? Asinine.

      Blocking attachments based on extension masks the real problem--on Windows, it is far too easy to execute a program from an e-mail. On any other platform, you receive an executable and you can't run it straight from the mail. So you save it to disk, but you still can't run it from the disk either. You have to go into the file permissions and set the executable bit, THEN execute it. And guess what? It works, and you can actually send and receive any type of attachment without any worries.

      NTFS has file permissions that allow this same sort of behavior on Windows. Executing a file just because it ends with a certain three letters is a security flaw in its own right. Some e-mail admins work around this flaw by blocking attachments. Others wait for Microsoft (or a competitor) to come up with the obvious solution.

      It's actually quite common to mail EXE files, and I still recommend it as the best way to send zipped files to Windows users who may or may not have compression software. If their e-mail program blocks our attachment, our customer service reps will happily work around the bug in their mail program.

    14. Re:Skeptical by NexusTw1n · · Score: 1
      "It's actually quite common to mail EXE files"
      Then any of your customers running Outlook 2002 will not be able to see that file.

      Outlook blocks such attachments by default. I've never seen an option to turn it off, and you can't even save the attachment to disk.

      Blocking .exe and .scr at the email gateway is therefore not in the slightest bit "asinine", because Outlook is never going to let you open the file if you let it through.

      A company that emails .exe's around the net seems pretty strange to me. Why not have a hyperlink via email to an FTP site, it's a far more efficient way of using your mail server. No serious company emails .exe's around, users have been hammered by IT support for years to never trust email attachments, even if you recognise the sender, FROM is too easily spoofed.

      There is no way, even if you were the most trusted company on the planet, that I would allow anyone in my department to open an exe file. Even if we were using a mail client that allowed it.
      --
      It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity. --Albert Einstein
    15. Re:Skeptical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can turn off the attachment blocking if you run an Exchange server--that's what we do here. Home users do not tend to use Outlook--instead using webmail or Outlook Express.

      Generally speaking, home users receive attachments fine. There are, as you stated, some e-mail programs that mangle e-mail before you can get it. If a mail program does not show you your e-mail, this is a bug.

      E-mailing EXE's is good because it works (for small EXE's--like I said, just auto-extracting ZIP files) and doesn't require that you maintain any sort of public download or FTP site at all. It's a low-cost solution, and the bandwidth is the same (and negligible too). We definitely have plans to change this way of doing things because more and more of our customers are using buggy mail software that won't show them the mail they receive. The point is that this is not a decision you make due to any technical advantage, but because you have to work around the bugs in someone else's program because they won't fix it themselves.

    16. Re:Skeptical by FasterThanLight · · Score: 1
      Everyone gets a message every few minutes about "please wait, connecting to server" until you get fed up and close outlook down for the day.
      Hrm. Seems to me, part of the problem is right there.

      "Hands up! Move away from the Outlook..."

      --
      They're a little melty, but damn are they exquisite!
    17. Re:Skeptical by RealityShunt · · Score: 1

      iterally thousands of these an hour. After it moves the infected message, it generates a nice email letting you know an email that was sent to you is currently in quarantine.

      Ow. Does it have a "digest" or "daily mail" setting? What, exactly, are you running here? Seems to me that during a virus flood, you'd be dealing with thousands of more or less identical messages...

      realityshunt

      --
      Democracy is susceptible to being led astray by having scapegoats paraded in front of the electorate.
    18. Re:Skeptical by RealityShunt · · Score: 1

      On the behalf of all virus writers out there, thank you for letting us know your schedules. We will make sure to set our activation times accordingly. :)

      realityshunt

      --
      Democracy is susceptible to being led astray by having scapegoats paraded in front of the electorate.
    19. Re:Skeptical by Sircus · · Score: 1

      I'd let users open exe files *if* they were PGP-signed as being from a company we have a relationship with and *if* the user was expecting the file (planned upgrade, or whatever).

      Since most users aren't capable enough to determine whether the conditions are true (or, to put it another way, most mail clients don't make this easy enough), this effectively translates to don't-open-EXEs.

      --
      PenguiNet: the (shareware) Windows SSH client
    20. Re:Skeptical by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "This article claims that time wasted will cost businesses tens on millions of dollars. It seems to me that no matter how much spam/virus flooding/crap you get in your inbox, you only do so much work everyday"

      Yep, this $20 million wasted from the virus just came out of the $800 million "sysadmins playing Doom" budget, it's not some new money that needs be spent.

    21. Re:Skeptical by WoTG · · Score: 1

      Agreed. No 'regular' user should be getting .exe's in a work environment. But I think it's relatively common for 'IT' folk to email .exe's around. It's just easier to pass a small tool to a peer at another office by email rather than FTP, or a link to a web site. Fortunately, IT folk are also the ones who know how to send zipped files if .exe's are blocked. And if zips get blocked... just rename the file I suppose...

  8. lesson by shakeittotheright · · Score: 2, Funny

    isn't the lesson here that people shouldn't go on vacation?

    1. Re:lesson by Farley+Mullet · · Score: 4, Funny
      isn't the lesson here that people shouldn't go on vacation?
      nope. it's that people shouldn't come back from vacation.
    2. Re:lesson by shakeittotheright · · Score: 0

      ah, of course! ( damn 20 seconds wait, how long does it take to type "ah, of course!" ? )

    3. Re:lesson by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      methinks that some support folks are gonna be given that suggestion when the management realizes how long the patch for this has been out...

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    4. Re:lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that should have made a little light in your head go off and have you think "hmm, maybe this reply isn't worth doing"

    5. Re:lesson by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1

      Nope. It's that IT support needs to schedule vacation immediately after the users return...

    6. Re:lesson by CowboyMeal · · Score: 1

      This virus doesn't take advantage of a bug, so there is no patch. SoBig merely relies on recipients running e-mail attachments. You may be thinking of Blaster and Nachi.

      --
      Your credit card information wants to be free.
    7. Re:lesson by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      You're right, my bad. I've been fighting all 3 for 2 days at work, and am tired and confused.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  9. Microsoft has serious problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    2 worms (DCOM and Welchia) and a virus variant in less than two weeks.

    This should tell investors that they are wasting their money.

    This should tell companies that they are wasting their money.

    Someone, somewhere, will hopefully get a clue.

    1. Re:Microsoft has serious problems by Kenja · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How much do you want to bet that the people getting the clue are not the ones who keep putting unpatched computers on the internet without a firewall? Come on, regardless of the platform thats just asking for it.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:Microsoft has serious problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say it's the admins who need to get a clue. Any company that let this shit get through needs to think about how valuable their current IT team is. If it means firing them and getting the right people in, or just paying them more than pennies to care about their job so be it.

      We didn't get a single worm internally (8 remote people) and not a single Sobig made it through either. Why? Because we care and damn proud of it.

    3. Re:Microsoft has serious problems by Kooglebot · · Score: 1

      >Someone, somewhere, will hopefully get a clue.

      God, I wish you were right.

      It won't help in the case of many smaller companies, because the people making the decisions are non-technical types who only have experience with MS products and who therefore THINK THIS IS NORMAL.

      Also, many people are tied to MS whether they want to be or not because they use programs that only run on the Wintel platform, have all their data in MS proprietary formats, etc. etc. Such is the nature of the de facto monopoly: even if you can convince someone that there is a better way, they just shrug their shoulders and say ``yeah, but whudya gonna do?''

    4. Re:Microsoft has serious problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I should be able to secure a server without a firewall. If I just want a Web server why can't I just shut everything else off? Why can I not be sure on Windows that when I only need to run one service that I am unable to limit it to ONLY this service?


      This is common with MS, it does not work as advertised and you can never be sure what is advertised, let alone what should or should not be running....

    5. Re:Microsoft has serious problems by Kenja · · Score: 1

      Becuase the TCP/IP stack at and the network card itself can both be over run. It the same reason NAT and segmented switches are not relay safe. If you can figure out the MAC address of the system you can hammer the hell out of it and break things, often allowing you to gain full enterence to the system. A firewall o nteh other hand should do statefull packet checking and figure out if a packet is 'bad' before it hits the server.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  10. Filtering out the crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FYI-- MacOSXHints.com published a set of filter instructions that would filter out this crap. I prefer some of the strategies in the comments, but for non-vulnerable machines, I guess this is the only thing to do.

  11. Worst I've seen by FAR by redelm · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I can just echo the comments made in the media.
    SoBig is the worst email virus I've seen -- BY FAR.


    Normally, I get about 30 spams per day and a few viruses. Not much harm to a Linux system running `mutt` as an MUA!. Yesterday, I received about 150 SoBig, plus maybe 30 automated msgs saying _I'd_ sent out such nastiness/bloat.

    1. Re:Worst I've seen by FAR by aridhol · · Score: 4, Insightful
      plus maybe 30 automated msgs saying _I'd_ sent out such nastiness/bloat.
      I was getting that, too. I think it generates the return address the same way it sends the to: address. They both come from the user's address book. Because of this, other people get the warnings, not the person who's actually infected. This allows the virus to go undetected longer.
      --
      I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
    2. Re:Worst I've seen by FAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I swear I have had more than 500 e-mails with the sobig.f, Not only from entirely random people across the internet but MY OWN OTHER EMAIL address! It's a hotmail so obviously its just spoofing somewhere.

      I don't know how much longer I can take these things. I can't block them because they come back as "bounced messages" due to my inbox being full but it still sends the infected file! If I block it, then I wont ever know if a legitimate bounced message reaches to me...

    3. Re:Worst I've seen by FAR by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      Here's my stats of email virii filtered out by Postini:

      * Virus Alert
      These virus-infected messages have been quarantined BEFORE they reached your email inbox. You can safely view the text of the message by clicking on the subject.
      Messages
      Message 1 - 10 of 491 | Next

      The only problem I have with Postini is that they send me a note for every single virus email they filter out, and I can't seem to turn that off (like I can the spam notification). So I still have ~620 messages in my inbox, about a hundred of which are bogus "You sent a virus" messages.

      I get a lot of those -- generated by infected people who have my email address somewhere on their PC. That's a pretty high number, if the virus mines email addies from web sites like mine that the victim has recently visited.

      You'd think the sysadmins would realize that it does no good anymore to tell the sender that they sent a virus, since the "sender" probably had nothing to do with it. [Insert M$-bashing comment about default operation here]

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    4. Re:Worst I've seen by FAR by worm+eater · · Score: 2, Informative

      plus maybe 30 automated msgs saying _I'd_ sent out such nastiness/bloat.

      Yeah, I've seen this too. And I *know* I'm not infected. I'm trying to figure out if the worm is making emails it sends look like bounced messages, or if it is spoofing my email address. Actually, I'd like to see some better research (or reporting) done on this. Initial reports I read made it sound like it would only spoof 'well-known' domain names such as ibm.com or microsoft.com. I have seen it coming from friends of mine (who may or may not have been infected), as well as places like halliburton.com. I've seen the 'Wicked Screensaver' variation more than anything else.

      --
      Maybe partying will help...
    5. Re:Worst I've seen by FAR by flakac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, the thing that bugs me most about most of the automatically generated virus warnings that I'm seeing is that they almost never provide info on the originating IP address. If I at least have that, I can try to warn people if I recognize a particular address...

    6. Re:Worst I've seen by FAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only from entirely random people across the internet but MY OWN OTHER EMAIL address!

      I don't know how much longer I can take these things.


      Well, stop sending them to yourself, silly.

    7. Re:Worst I've seen by FAR by owlstead · · Score: 1
      The only problem I have with Postini is that they send me a note for every single virus email they filter out, and I can't seem to turn that off (like I can the spam notification). So I still have ~620 messages in my inbox, about a hundred of which are bogus "You sent a virus" messages.
      That should at least be simple to filter out. The 'you send a virus' messages won't be caught by your scanner anyways, they are anoying but they don't carry a virus I presume.

      Currently the virusscanner at work does _not_ notify me if a suspect mail has been dropped. This is mightely anoying, since you never know if a business relative did send an infected mail (or one with an executable attachment in our case) or did not post one at all.

      Trust me, better to filter some out than not receiving them at all. Unless you are requesting them over a mobile phone line maybe....

      Warper
    8. Re:Worst I've seen by FAR by Bluetrust25 · · Score: 1

      I can just echo the comments made in the media.
      SoBig is the worst email virus I've seen -- BY FAR.


      Ugh, absolutely. I've received over 500 SoBig emails today. Yesterday wasn't as bad, I only received 300+.

      My email account isn't setup exactly as a normal users would be. All support emails for the surveys we do get forwarded to my regular pop3 account, so I'm indirectly in a few thousand clueless people's address books.

    9. Re:Worst I've seen by FAR by PetWolverine · · Score: 1

      He who breaks a thing to discover what it is has left the path of wisdom.

      Not if in breaking it, I learn how to put it back together and make it work again. I've done this numerous times, and have not yet left the path of wisdom.

      --
      I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
  12. Once again, a punishing blow to M$ security by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Sunner said that most of the problems caused by SoBig involve the time and cost of cleaning the worm from computer systems.

    No, most of the problems caused by SoBig involve shitty software.

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

    1. Re:Once again, a punishing blow to M$ security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, all the problems caused by SoBig involve shitty users.

      If they don't launch the attachment, they don't get infected.

    2. Re:Once again, a punishing blow to M$ security by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Really? Beacuse I launched it on Linux and it didn't do anything. Same with Mac OS X.

      --

      Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

    3. Re:Once again, a punishing blow to M$ security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they don't launch the attachment, they don't get infected.

      So if I decide to hand out hand grenades at a daycare, I suppose it isn't my fault if one of the kids is stupid enough to pull the pin?

  13. school's in! by theflea · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wait till infected laptops & workstations start moving back into the dorms!

    1. Re:school's in! by Jacer · · Score: 5, Funny

      This isn't funny, I work on campus tech support. It's move in week, and the 30 of us on staff are working 60+ hours this week. 8,000 or so computers are coming back, of those, we expect about 5,600 to be unpatched, and we expect that of those 5,600, that only 1,400 or so will be able to follow our documentation. That leaves us with 4,200 machines to patch, and clean before Monday (and here I sit on Slashdot)

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    2. Re:school's in! by Skweetis · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Not funny. They've started coming back already, and our dorm subnets are crawling with msblast. I filtered port 135 and 444 ingress and egress at the building routers, but we still (no joke) have around 95% infection rate. I'm assuming the other 5% are CS students with Linux boxes and a few old Win98 systems.

      I'm just dreading Saturday when the majority of them show up, it's only 200 students now and the technicians can't keep up.

    3. Re:school's in! by Genady · · Score: 1

      God no! Why wait, it's already started and I see IPTABLES entries in my syslog constantly (logcheck runs once/hour) with this crap from Dorm Machines. Good thing they're all in one IP range... which I have blocked.

      --


      What if it is just turtles all the way down?
    4. Re:school's in! by Skweetis · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sorry to reply to my own post. The quarantine partition (I save out dropped messages for a while, just in case of a false positive or something) on the mailserver just hit 90%, and it's 100GB. It was somewhere around 5-10% this morning. Not a good day.

    5. Re:school's in! by spyderX · · Score: 1

      Here comes the liberal arts majors :)

    6. Re:school's in! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhm, give the reshalls their own v-lan, let them sort it out.

    7. Re:school's in! by mattwolfewvu · · Score: 1
      I shit you not, first day of CS 453: Computer Networking (Internet applications) class, the professor comes in, hooks his laptop up to the projector and gets it working, and then turns the projector off to write on the white board. 20 minutes later he goes to turn the projector back on, and the Blaster worm had got him. Go back to the engineering building today, and the graduate student computer lab has a sign on the door saying "closed due to virus."

      Kind of sad that my cheap Linksys router's firewall kept me protected (I didn't patch until this morning because of it, tisk tisk I know) while the school with all its tech heads is getting blasted.

      Of course, maybe I shouldn't be suprised, this is the same school that put Debian on all the Sparcs and NT boxes, yet has CS professors that require homework to be submitted in a Word template that OpenOffice.org Writer chokes on. If Blizzard and Valve released all their games with Linux clients, and I didn't have to deal with stupidity such as the previous example, I wouldn't even be using fscking windows...I'm converted to OpenOffice.org, and Mozilla Thunderbird/Firebird.

      --
      "I think that when you become a Republican, you don't get to score any more." -- Butt-head
    8. Re:school's in! by steelneck · · Score: 1

      Start recomending them other than Ms systems then. But since you get income by it....

    9. Re:school's in! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not play the games already available for Linux? You're happy to use alternatives for Word and Internet Explorer, but why not do the same with games? Just a thought.

    10. Re:school's in! by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1
      Jacer, I run a university help desk with 32,000 students to support.

      My advice: Tell the students to get off their lazy asses and patch their own godammned systems! They're college students, for God's sake! They should be able to point and click while reading from the screen or a piece of paper.

      I'm an asshole when it comes to that, but I always make the student and the employee do the work themselves so they know how to do it in the future. otherwise, you're just giving them the fish to eat, but not teaching them to fish on their own.

    11. Re:school's in! by herrvinny · · Score: 1

      Ban college students from having Windows? Half of them don't even know any other OS!

    12. Re:school's in! by tgd · · Score: 1

      Better suggestion: scan the systems and disable the port on the switch/router when you find one that is unpatched. If a college student can't follow basic instructions, they shouldn't be online.

      When I was in school, we didn't hesitate to shut off a port when something was wrong with a PC -- and this was seven or eight years ago when this kind of crap was rare.

    13. Re:school's in! by dlb · · Score: 1

      Because the games are usually "old" by the time they're available for linux, or they just suck.

    14. Re:school's in! by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      and this was seven or eight years ago when this kind of crap was rare.

      That, I think, is the problem. It's not rare any more. I think I went through the first ten years of my "computing" life without seeing more than one virus, maybe two at the most. (On other folks' computers; I remember one chap who went to Russia on some kind of a missionary trip and returned wondering why his portable computer didn't work any more.)

      Now viruses are common. And "just shut the bugger down" isn't a workable option any more when such a huge percentage of the users (who actually do expect to be able to USE the services they are paying for or are being paid to use) can be affected by things like this.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    15. Re:school's in! by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1

      Oh shit.

      I suddenly remember I work in a computer store and that I have to begin again next Tuesday, in the middle of the SoBig.F storm. Thankfully, I don't have to repair the damned systems. (I'm only the intern, I get to unravel cables and vaccuum the floor instead...) But I already dread the horror stories of stupid people who think it's anything BUT a virus.

    16. Re:school's in! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our school was handing out CDs with the patch, MSblaster removal tool, and Norton Antivirus when I moved in. They also had virus warnings on the university web site.

    17. Re:school's in! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      students maybe, but employees no.. In my opinion, the IT staff is there to support the employees and as I have found in the past, asking people to update/install something on their computer does not work. Especially in a case like this, it is very important to patch every last computer.. the only way you'll do that in a large environment is through automation, lots of scanning, and a plan of attack to get the portable/desktop machines that don't take the automated patches. It is the IT staff's responsibility to do that and not the employees.. employees time is better spent doing their jobs.

    18. Re:school's in! by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Why not just block port 135 to prevent the RPC protocol from negotiating a connection in the first place? As soon as I found out that windows xp came with the service permanently installed I blocked it at the router. That was 2 years ago?

    19. Re:school's in! by DarkAce911 · · Score: 1

      I just got home this because some idiot at headquarters did just that last night and did not tell anyone at the local level. I work for a Fortune 100 company and I had 40 machines out of 400 drop right the hell off the network. I really enjoyed telling the plant manager we could not get him back on the network untill late in the day. What is so bad is we are getting hit by 3 different types of worms and the e-mail virus. 15+ minute hold times for the helpdesk today.

      Bad Mojo for somebody, they will find themselves on the street for this level of screw-up.

    20. Re:school's in! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Install linux, and tell them its the new version of Windows! They'll never know the difference!

    21. Re:school's in! by RealityShunt · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah, a friend emailed me today and told me he was buried up to his fingers.

      Good luck, you guys. Really. I'm just glad I quit TS some years back.

      Here's to hoping it doesn't get any worse (hah!) I have two days off and I'm hoisting a ice-cold glass....

      realityshunt

      --
      Democracy is susceptible to being led astray by having scapegoats paraded in front of the electorate.
    22. Re:school's in! by PetWolverine · · Score: 1

      [O]therwise, you're just giving them the fish to eat, but not teaching them to fish on their own.

      Give a man a match, and he'll be warm for but a moment; light him on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

      --
      I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
    23. Re:school's in! by Jardine · · Score: 1

      If you're having a big problem with msblast, you could always infect the computers on the network with Nachi.

      Probably a bad idea though.

    24. Re:school's in! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got a wierd thought. Would it be possible to create a seperate VLAN for every network drop on campus and use inter VLAN routing for every connection?

      That way you could filter traffic between any two computers on your entire network. I bet in the future this will the typical network setup. Probably won't happen until IPv6.

      Of course this would require some serious network gear. Hey good for Cisco! Good for the economy! Next week news will read. Economy saved by endless birage of internet worms.

    25. Re:school's in! by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1
      Well, there's always that great wish of M$'s to automate updates and not even give you a choice! ;)

      My personal opinion is that no one is too busy to run Software Update or Windows Update or LiveUpdate when they're headed on their way out to lunch.

      Sorry, son - the real world is knocking on universities' doors. We're already understaffed, we're losing people through layoffs, and we aren't going to see new postions for a while.

      The employees can learn to do a little something for themselves.

  14. Procmail finally by unfortunateson · · Score: 5, Informative

    Our computers aren't getting infected: between virus scan, ZoneAlarm, ancient e-mail client and knowing not to open the stupid attachments, we've not gotten infected.

    But >1000 100K e-mails per day to a single address were swamping our ability to do anything but download and delete.

    It took two days of querying tech support at my ISP before they'd admit that procmail would work, and a quickie recipe dumps all the infected files. Yay. I should have just done it without checking tech support, for all they helped.

    This was listed in a previous thread, but it's worth repeating:
    In a .procmailrc file, put :0 B
    * ^ *Content-Disposition: attachment;
    * filename=".*\.(pif|exe|scr)" /dev/null

    This deletes any message with a pif, exe or scr attachment.

    I'll get more sophisticated later once I learn more about procmail, but for now, this does the job, without having to worry about SHELL and PATH settings.

    --
    Design for Use, not Construction!
    1. Re:Procmail finally by Smallpond · · Score: 1


      Also add doc and xls. I'm sick of getting 12K word docs that turn out to be two lines of text.

    2. Re:Procmail finally by siskbc · · Score: 1
      It took two days of querying tech support at my ISP before they'd admit that procmail would work, and a quickie recipe dumps all the infected files. Yay. I should have just done it without checking tech support, for all they helped.

      Hope you learned your lesson. ;)

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    3. Re:Procmail finally by gid · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ya, and as a plus, it'll also block all those annoying clients, sending you word docs and spread sheets, wanting you to do work.

    4. Re:Procmail finally by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      ... exactly.

    5. Re:Procmail finally by Malc · · Score: 1

      1,000 per day - is that all? Our support account was getting 1,000 every 5-10 minutes. Client-side rules in Outlook couldn't even keep up.

      Somebody's advice in the story the other day to use XWall turned out to be the answer. We're discarding all the crap before it hits the Exchange 5.5 server. In fact, things are better now than before XWall as it's blocking a lot of other crap too. Too bad it requires backwards virus scanners like McAfee 4.2 command line (what, we have to update the defs manually?), and its support for the latest F-Proto is broken so that every message was being tagged as virus laden. It doesn't *feel* very polished and modern, but it is a useful stop gap.

    6. Re:Procmail finally by Eyes666 · · Score: 1

      You might want to be a little more careful with (probably mangled):
      * ^Content-Disposition: (attachment|inline);
      * name=.*\.(asd|bat|bin|chm|cil|cmd|com|dll|dot|exe| hlp|hta|inf|ini|js|lnk|nws|ocx|pif|pl|reg|scr|sea| sh(b|s)|spl|swf|vb|vb(e|s)|ws(c|f|h)|xlt|mda|mdt|m dw)

      Also some macs do not MIME encode but uuencode so you might also want to include a recipe like so:
      * !^Mime
      * ^end
      * ^begin .*\.(asd|bat|bin|chm|cil|cmd|com|dll|dot|exe|hlp|h ta|inf|ini|js|lnk|nws|ocx|pif|pl|reg|scr|sea|sh(b| s)|spl|swf|vb|vb(e|s)|ws(c|f|h)|xlt|mda|mdt|mdw)

    7. Re:Procmail finally by Jack+William+Bell · · Score: 1
      I should have just done it without checking tech support, for all they helped.
      Supposedly Rear Admiral Grace Hopper was the person who coined the phrase "It is easier to apologize than it is to get permission."
      --
      - -
      Are you an SF Fan? Are you a Tru-Fan?
    8. Re:Procmail finally by n0ano · · Score: 1

      Good first effort but you forgot about .bat, .com and probably a few other executable extensions that I don't know about.

      --
      Don Dugger
      "Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
    9. Re:Procmail finally by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      Isn't that a sad commentary on what we expect these days?

      "Tech Support" seems to be the #2 oxymoron, right behind "Windows Security".

    10. Re:Procmail finally by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Get this: http://www.impsec.org/email-tools/procmail-securit y.html This program will protect you against all known, unknown, ancient and future e-mail viruses. Yes, it is that good.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
  15. before this post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    did anyone see cmdrtaco post "lunis says SCO is smoking crack!"?

    1. Re:before this post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah what the hell happened to that one, Is Taco on crack?

    2. Re:before this post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a MAJOR repost... heres the original article.. not even a day old click me

  16. Brain-dead auto-responders... by ktakki · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So far this week, I've received only seven actual copies of W32/Sobig. However, the number of messages from mailer-daemons and mail server virus scanners has exceeded this by a factor of ten. Some of these rejection messages actually include a copy of the infected .PIF file.

    You would think that after Klez, the people who write these virus scanners and those who administer mail servers would realize that viruses sometimes spoof the "From:" field. I didn't send it, my Mac is not infected. You're just annoying me. Please go away.

    At best, this is collateral damage. At worst, these rejection messages are actually advertising the IP addresses of infected systems. Should a virus drop a back door payload, this would multiply the damage.

    k.

    --
    "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
    1. Re:Brain-dead auto-responders... by Hayzeus · · Score: 1

      Amen. This is astoundingly idiotic. I'm getting a tremendous amount of email back from brain-dead virus scanners (apparently installed by brain-dead admins).

    2. Re:Brain-dead auto-responders... by slagdogg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I like it when they include the pif in the return message, that way SpamAssassin files it away in my spam folder ... without the pif it's seen (rightfully) as a legitimate message.

      --
      (Score:-1, Wrong)
    3. Re:Brain-dead auto-responders... by kmilani2134 · · Score: 1

      The company I work is a small marketing consultancy that only uses mac OS 9.2 (and Linux on the server side). Our clients have been writing/calling us to tell us to quit sending them viruses, so we have had to write these people back to tell them that we are not the culprits. Are systems are not affected by these worms and that the From addresses have been spoofed. We are also seeing a lot of responses from virus scanners saying we are sending out viruses, when we know that we are not. Some of the addresses that we are supposedly sending to aren't even in our address books!

      --
      Those who trade freedom for security will lose both, and deserve neither" -- Ben Franklin
    4. Re:Brain-dead auto-responders... by jrumney · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You would think that after Klez, the people who write these virus scanners and those who administer mail servers would realize that viruses sometimes spoof the "From:" field.

      They don't care. The point of those messages is not some public service of informing people that their computers are infected, the point is to advertise the virus software.

      Actually, I take that back. I did get one scanner-autoreply today that included full headers, which let me track down the real culprit. But most of them are blatent advertising, I report them as spam to the virus cartel's upstream provider.

    5. Re:Brain-dead auto-responders... by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1
      You're assuming that the administrators have the ability to set a "spoof" option. In our case at my university, the administrators do not - it is a feature request we're making. Thus, the admins turned the notification off to the sender, but that still doesn't help when there is a virus without spoofing infecting things...

      Just keep in mind that the admins don't always have the ability to wave a wand and make what you want come true. ;)

    6. Re:Brain-dead auto-responders... by Jack+William+Bell · · Score: 1

      I've been bitching about the same thing for days now. The spam filtering is catching the virus mail sent to me, but I am getting around 50 bounce and virus scanner messages a day.

      Annoying as hell. I run Mozilla Mail for a reason, dammit!

      --
      - -
      Are you an SF Fan? Are you a Tru-Fan?
    7. Re:Brain-dead auto-responders... by ewen · · Score: 3, Interesting
      You would think that after Klez, the people who write these virus scanners and those who administer mail servers would realize that viruses sometimes spoof the "From:" field. I didn't send it, my Mac is not infected. You're just annoying me. Please go away.

      Someone on LiveJournal speculated that these messages were actually advertising, for the anti-virus product, and should be treated as spam/unsolicited bulk email.

      I certainly agree that where the virus is known to spoof email addresses, it only makes the problem much much worse for everyone if you send a message saying (in effect) "the message you didn't send had a virus, there's nothing you can do about it, but please share the pain". And the anti-virus writers should be... persuaded... not to send out these virus reports to forged email addresses.

      The 1000+ copies per day of the virus are easy enough to filter. The gazillons of different formats of useless "virus notifications" are not.

      Ewen

    8. Re:Brain-dead auto-responders... by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 1
      They don't care. The point of those messages is not some public service of informing people that their computers are infected, the point is to advertise the virus software.


      Hmm, I wonder if these could be classified as spam under any state anti-spam laws. A few thousand small claims court settlements and the AV manufacturers might pull the plug on this 'feature'.
    9. Re:Brain-dead auto-responders... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      My friend was caught with this. She's a Mac user in a very Windows-centric group of friends and co-workers so she'd getting a lot of those replies to her address.

      I received a concerned email this morning telling me her inbox was swamped with autoresponse emails (all with the attachments still there no less) and was worried she was infected.

    10. Re:Brain-dead auto-responders... by SoSueMe · · Score: 0, Troll
      They look as beeing helpful but in fact they are a bunch of spammer.
      ...Or in /. speak "They look as beeing helpful but in fact they are a bunch of spammerii ."
    11. Re:Brain-dead auto-responders... by billstewart · · Score: 4, Interesting
      This has been discussed a bit on the NANOG list. The ideal place to do the virus scanning would be during the SMTP transmission phase, rather than after the fact, so you could fail the transmission with a "553 go away you virus!" (and maybe a teergrube) instead of accepting the message and sending it to the forged From: line. (It looks like Sendmail milters give you hooks that could be used for this.) That way, if the virus runs its own SMTP, it gets messages that it ignores, and if the virus abuses it's victims' email programs, then they'll get the warning, but the From: won't.

      Alternatively, if you're going to do the virus check after the mail's been accepted, it sure would be nice if the virus-checker programs kept track of which viruses usually forge the sender and which don't, so it can skip the bouncegrams on the forged ones.

      Dave Farber's been mentioned in the press - his mailing list is very large and gets quoted a lot, so his address is in lots of people's mailboxes and gets forged a lot.

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    12. Re:Brain-dead auto-responders... by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1
      I run a Python milter for sendmail with DSPAM header triage. It has been REJECTing messages at the rate of over 1000/hr for the last 2 days after receiving only the headers. The filter is automatically trained by the few that get through to my mailbox. I couldn't have survived the last few days (at least while getting any work done) without it.

      Using the milter interface, messages can be rejected anytime. While rejecting extremely spammy mail is worthwhile, it is important to allow mail for which there is some doubt through in case of false positives. I suppose the milter could fully receive the mail before rejecting it, and *still* deliver it to the user for feedback.

    13. Re:Brain-dead auto-responders... by waynemcdougall · · Score: 1
      Isn't this a breach of RFC 2821? Once you've saiud you will receive the DATA for the message you should receive the emssage DATA and then send a rejection message.

      Most mail servers will just retry if you just drop a connection in the middle of transmission of the mail data, which seems to be what you are suggesting. What happens on the reconnects (and the increased load that induces)?

      --
      Recycle PCs and build a wireless community network www.hillsborough.org.nz
    14. Re:Brain-dead auto-responders... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your sig rocks.

    15. Re:Brain-dead auto-responders... by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1
      I am relying on sendmail to do the right thing protocol wise. If you are correct, then sendmail probably collects the remaining data before rejecting and discarding it - so I am not actually saving any bandwidth. Which means that I should probably scan the entire message, not just the headers. Arrgh.

      SMTP was just not designed with spamming scum in mind.

  17. So.... by GeckoFood · · Score: 1

    ...how is this different than getting rid of all that damn spam in my inbox every day? Would I even notice what the worm does to my inbox?

    --
    Be excellent to each other. And... PARTY ON, DUDES!
  18. Hooray! by slagdogg · · Score: 1

    Only 5 more days until I stop receiving 500 "Returned mail" messages a day in my inbox courtesy of that little header spoofing bastard. Who says Windows viruses don't affect us Linux users?

    --
    (Score:-1, Wrong)
  19. SoNice.ToSee.YouBack by blcamp · · Score: 5, Funny


    Don't complain.

    With SoMany.IT.Workers unemployed, SoBig.And.ItsVariants have a strangely positive side effect... ...job security.

    --
    The problem with socialism is that they always run out of other people's money. - Margaret Thatcher
    1. Re:SoNice.ToSee.YouBack by moxomillion · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With all the mainstream media attention, I'd be willing to bet Symantec and Network Solutions are hiring. Does anyone have statistics on the relationship between the size of the virus outbreak, and the revenue that these companies take in?

    2. Re:SoNice.ToSee.YouBack by Exitthree · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just look at how well Symantec is doing! Up almost three dollars today.

    3. Re:SoNice.ToSee.YouBack by moxomillion · · Score: 1

      Obviously I meant Network Associates

    4. Re:SoNice.ToSee.YouBack by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1

      dude you are not kidding

      i have had my resume on monster.com for years with only a couple of calls. last night a security company called and we are talking a 50% increase in salary - i interview next friday :D

    5. Re:SoNice.ToSee.YouBack by RealityShunt · · Score: 1

      This joke is getting so old even my ten year old daughter realizes it.

      We both got a good laugh, tho. Especially over the creative formatting. Thanks.

      Holy moley....

      realityshunt

      --
      Democracy is susceptible to being led astray by having scapegoats paraded in front of the electorate.
  20. Ouch! by Shadow2097 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I've been dealing with literally thousands of emails coming into my office just today! The sales people are having a running contest to see who gets the most infected emails every hour. So far the winners are usually at ~150/hour.

    Normally we don't block emails with specific attachments at our post office because it takes too long to scan them. Our company of 100 people averages 14,000 legit email per day in and out, but with this outbreak as bad as it is (and not peaked yet!) the blocking is being instated tonight.

    While musing with a programmer here who just moved her daughter into college, we brought up an interesting thought: Hundreds of thousands of college kids are moving back into dorms with huge fat pipes and Outlook style email clients on computers that haven't been patched since April or May. Yikes!

    -Shadow

    1. Re:Ouch! by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 1

      Assuming y'all work 8 hour days, that's approximately one email every three minutes (per person).

      Damn! What the kind of business is this, anyway?

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
    2. Re:Ouch! by The+Bungi · · Score: 1

      My $deity. Just block based on the body "please see attached file..." or whatever. I haven't goten a single one since I blocked with that at the domain level. Not a single one to any of the ~50 or so addresses/aliases inside.

    3. Re:Ouch! by siskbc · · Score: 1
      While musing with a programmer here who just moved her daughter into college, we brought up an interesting thought: Hundreds of thousands of college kids are moving back into dorms with huge fat pipes and Outlook style email clients on computers that haven't been patched since April or May. Yikes!

      Of what year? ;) Seriously, most people in my dorm back in the day couldn't even keep from throwing the circuit breakers when using 15 appliances at once, let alone figure out how to use antivirus. I'd say may is your best case scenario.

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    4. Re:Ouch! by kmilani2134 · · Score: 1

      One person my company corresponds with had to write us back because to confirm that we were sending a legitimate email with attachment. This is because when we attach a file we generally use the phrase "please see the attached," but now that phrase is apparently making people nervous. Certainly filtering and deleting email based on that phrase wouldn't be good for the people we do business with because it is pretty standard for us to send attachments with just that phrase in the body of the email.

      --
      Those who trade freedom for security will lose both, and deserve neither" -- Ben Franklin
    5. Re:Ouch! by Wyzard · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm a student consultant at my school who helps other students with computer problems, and believe me, the network people in charge here are fully aware of this fact. For what we call "mass-install week", which means setting up all the new students, we're being told to enable the XP firewall, check for and remove Blaster, install patches from windowsupdate and explain to the student the importance of patching, and install the school's site-licensed copy of Norton.

      Hopefully these sort of measures, here and at other schools, will mitigate the damage.

    6. Re:Ouch! by The+Bungi · · Score: 1

      Sure, but in this case that's the *only* thing in the body. Surely your mail filters support regular expressions to a certain extent? It's fairly easy to process them so.

    7. Re:Ouch! by tomhudson · · Score: 0
      If that's the sum and total of your aschools' plan, you might as well kiss your ass goodbye, 'cause it ain't gonna work.

      First, you've not even mentioned the returning students, which outnumber the new students. Second, expecting all (or even a majority) of the users to be able to follow directions re. updating, when M$ patches have a history of breaking things, is naive

      Either get them to buy Macs, or install a different OS. Anything else is a waste of time, and just ensures the root cause of the problem (crappyOS from a company that uses security holes as a forced upgrade marketing technique).

    8. Re:Ouch! by Shadow2097 · · Score: 1
      I replied to a similar question below, but I don't want to ignore you either.

      We're in the international relocation business, and its BIG. Each of our Ops people maintains daily contact with over a hundred people (and usually closer to 200) in the process of moving overseas. Imagine coordinating moving companies on both sides of the pond, customs agents, airlines, insurange agents...I'm sure you get the idea.

      We actually have a special arrangement with our ISP because of our volume. They do site inspections every once in a while to make sure that we're not a spamhaus, but because of the volume of mail we send out, it keeps tripping their filters.

      -Shadow

    9. Re:Ouch! by fermion · · Score: 1
      Hundreds of thousands of college kids are moving back into dorms with huge fat pipes and Outlook style email clients on computers that haven't been patched since April or May

      Remember, when sending kids off to college, remind them it that the best ways get a disease is to do drugs, have unprotected sex, and use Windows

      We must help the new generation learn the importance of responsibility for ones actions, safe sex and safe computing! It does no good to complain after the fact. "Oh, I just went to the StudParty for a bit of fun. I didn't mean to get drunk and get a virus!"

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    10. Re:Ouch! by owlstead · · Score: 3, Informative

      One that uses mailinglists? I was subscribed to several interesting ones that I had to turn off due to the enourmous feed. Not that my system could not handle it, but I could not.

      If you are unlucky some of your employees like chain letters and 'funny' mails, or mails with nude females (could we call those just femails?).

      And then you have helpdesks and stuff, or really tech savy people. 't is not that difficult getting 3 mails per minute.

      Warper

    11. Re:Ouch! by Wyzard · · Score: 1

      Those are just the things they're telling the student consultants to do, since we'll be dealing with all the new freshmen. I was in a hurry when I posted my last message and didn't think to mention the other steps that are being taken.

      They're also scanning the entire network for systems that are vulnerable, identifying the owners of those systems based on their network jack, and sending email to those owners telling them to patch up. (These people will continue to receive these messages periodically until they install the patch.) The login script for NetWare (which most people use, though not all) scans the system for MSBlaster, and removes it and warns the user if found. And the RPC ports that MSBlaster uses to spread are being blocked at the point of connection to the Internet.

      I realize that this thread is supposed to be about SoBig, not MSBlaster, but MSBlaster seems to be what they're mostly concerned with. Regarding things that spread by email, though, inbound and outbound SMTP traffic is restricted to a few "authorized" servers, run by the university, the CSE department, etc. (Actually, I need to meet with the security guy sometime soon to get my club's mailing-list server whitelisted -- an ACM chapter that doubles as a LUG is competent enough to run a secure mailserver, but we have to approach them about it.)

      I think these measures are fairly comprehensive, though if you can think of any other steps that could be taken, I'd be interested in hearing about them.

    12. Re:Ouch! by glassesmonkey · · Score: 1

      Along these lines. I'm getting 10 emails an hour from 3 machines on campus. I've sent emails to site, etc. to no avail.

      One address is a library machine and from the IP in the header I've tracked it down to the Biological Library and so finally I went and found the physical machine and pressed the OFF switch.

      The "IT" people will probably never fix it. This is a good case for anti-virus viruses.. I wish I could introduce one in a public lab environment.

    13. Re:Ouch! by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Sounds good except for the part about identifying them by network jack - a lot of them are going to be using laptops, and they'll have a lot of incentive to "borrow" someone else's jack so that the **AA can't subpoena them for "borrowing" mp3s with a "borrowed" password.

    14. Re:Ouch! by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I guess I'm illiterate. I didn't catch the "inbound" part of that.

      In my mind, I was visualizing a hundred people sitting at sweatshop desks just pounding out email all day, doing nothing else: DEAR SIR, I (THE SON OF MOBUTU SESE-SEKO) HOPE THIS UNEXPECTED COMMUNICATION IS NOT EMBARRASSING, I RECEIVED YOUR NAME FROM MANY BUSINESS LEADERS...

      Inbound, it's easy to believe. I receive on the order of 10-15/hr on an average, 24 hours a day. Mailing lists, spam, work email, and then actual personal messages.

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
    15. Re:Ouch! by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1

      we just filter attachments based on extension. .pif's are right out

  21. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what .. more than 50% of email users were on
    vacation last week?

    what 'experts' claim this?

    wtfever

  22. Doubtful... by gearmonger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...for two reasons: IT staff will have had just that many more days to upgrade safety systems, and there are actually fewer people on vacation (at least here in the US) this week of the year than last week. So, the worst is likely behind us...not that the coming weeks will be a picnic.

  23. Why deal? by Glendale2x · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Okay... so it costs time and money to clean these random virus outbreaks from Windows machines. So did the last big virus problem before this, and the one before it, and so on.

    Maybe I'm missing something here, but why do businesses and consumers put up with this stuff?

    --
    this is my sig
    1. Re:Why deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior[not audentor} ito.- Virgil.

      Yield thou not to adversity, but press on the more bravely.

    2. Re:Why deal? by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior[not audentor} ito.- Virgil.

      Dammit... i blame the keyboard.

      --
      this is my sig
    3. Re:Why deal? by opiatepipedream · · Score: 1

      what does this "Ne Cede Malis Sed Contra Audientor Ito" mean. I'd really like to know.

    4. Re:Why deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the annoying things about believing in free will and individual responsibility is the difficulty of finding somebody to blame your problems on. And when you do find somebody, it's remarkable how often his picture turns up on your driver's license.

      -- P. J. O'Rourke

      (Sorry, don't have the Latin)

  24. I, for one, welcome our new worm overlords. by DrSkwid · · Score: 1, Funny

    ok, my turn

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  25. For those who'd like to see... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 0

    For those who'd like to see a beowulf cluster of those, just wait until next morning.

  26. conspairacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet there is a conspairacy with virus writers trying to make microsoft plumit to their death...

  27. Sorry - shoulda previewed by unfortunateson · · Score: 5, Informative
    The line wrapping on the recipe got mangled:
    :0 B
    * ^ *Content-Disposition: attachment;
    * filename=".*\.(pif|exe|scr)"
    /dev/null
    --
    Design for Use, not Construction!
    1. Re:Sorry - shoulda previewed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, thanks! I'm going to put this in my .procmailrc as soon as I get home tonight; I just started using procmail, fetchmail, and mutt last night. Still got to get Exim set up, I don't trust nbsmtp.

      Though I'd also add bmp and dll; I've had some obnoxious people send me bitmap images instead of jpeg.

    2. Re:Sorry - shoulda previewed by Chainsaw+Messiah · · Score: 2, Informative

      make that

      (vbs|vsf|vbe|wsh|hta|scr|pif|com|exe|shs|bat|bas |s cr|wav|eml|dll)

      and you should be set

  28. Vacation? by *weasel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    did a statistically significant portion of the workforce on vacation this week?

    that seems like a pretty weak overall premise for an expected resurgence.

    now if he said that he expects a steady stream of continued activity into early next month, due to all the people who take vacations throughout august - he might have a point.

    but to suggest that these 'vacationers' will unleash the same spam deluge monday that the rest of the unwashed have given us this past week, is a bit shaky.

    --
    // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    1. Re:Vacation? by RollingThunder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's more that they will all open their mailboxes, and the previously dormant worms, simultaneously.

      The rest of the victims got it in bits and pieces - but the vacationers will unleash it in hourly bursts, as they come into the office.

      It'll only be a 10-20% boost, probably, but it'll be the biggest "all in one" boost.

    2. Re:Vacation? by plcurechax · · Score: 1

      did a statistically significant portion of the workforce on vacation this week?


      In areas affected by the power outage, yes. My colleagues in Ottawa are not allowed to go to work until Monday, in order to converse power.

    3. Re:Vacation? by dcocos · · Score: 1

      Speaking for the Washington DC area a lot of people are on vacation, because Congress isn't in session which means that all of thier support isn't in either (nor the lobbiests [sp?]) add in the fact that people want to get out of town one last time before thier kids start school and _yes_ there are a lot of people on vacation, this is further evidenced by the fact that my commute now only takes 1:05 (65 minutes in metric) as opposed to the usual 1:20 (80 minutes in metric)

    4. Re:Vacation? by Nucleon500 · · Score: 1

      I see I'm not the only one in favor of metric time. But we need to go further. 10 hours a day, 100 minutes per hour and 100 seconds per minute. The names should probably be changed. I'm dead serious. (Of course I'm an American, and we haven't done metric anything yet.) This stupid 60:60:12-24 system has wasted far too much of my time.

    5. Re:Vacation? by pigscanfly.ca · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes they did . In ontario all non essential employees were told not to work (a number still did anyways ; go figure .) but non the less that is a huge number of employees . They are to be going back tommorow or monday to there regular works . And the federal goverment has huge pipes. I can only hope CIS has everyt thing locked down in advanced (not bloddy likely given there past performance . )

    6. Re:Vacation? by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Their had a vacation in order to talk about power?

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    7. Re:Vacation? by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Ohhhh yeah, I can see that happening sometime in the next millenia...

      How about we fix the things that need fixing before we go off the deep end? If you can't remember that there are 24 hours in a day, 60 minutes in an hour, and 60 seconds in a minute, then.. well.. you might want to reconsider going back to school.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    8. Re:Vacation? by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "And the federal goverment has huge pipes."

      Didn't they sell those to Iraq for making missiles with?

    9. Re:Vacation? by pigscanfly.ca · · Score: 1

      that was your goverment . US corporations sold a large number of base materials for makeing weapons to iraq pre-invasion .

  29. The problems next Monday will be.... by macshune · · Score: 0, Redundant

    SoBig!!!


    Ugh...I hate this virus.

  30. In nine years of sending and receiving email, I've only seen one virus, Klez.

    I guess it goes to show how wildly unpopular I am.

    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
    1. Re:huh by Jhon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Aren't you lucky. Here's what our email server cought since Monday:

      237 W32/Yaha-E
      235 W32/Klez-H
      009 W32/Sircam-A
      004 W32/Bugbear-B
      003 Dial/PecDial-B
      002 W32/Yaha-K
      002 Troj/Peido-B
      001 W32/Sobig-F
      001 W32/Klez-E
      001 W32/Bugbear-Dam

      Only one Sobig so far... But Klez and Yaha numbers have been high for months. Too many of our users have front-facing email addresses (posted on our corporate website).

    2. Re:huh by Jibber · · Score: 1

      Interesting... Are you sure your virus scanner is actually catching Sobig.F ? I'd really double check that your scanner is operating correctly.

      This is my last 4 months and Sobig.F only started getting caught early morning on the 19th.

      Not a complete list, just the top ones.

      Worm.Sobig.F: 932
      Exploit.IFrame.HTML: 79
      Worm.Sobig.E: 52
      Worm.BugBear.B: 46
      Worm.Sobig.A: 41
      Worm.Palyh.A: 25
      Worm/Klez.H: 25
      Worm.Sobig.C: 20
      Exploit.IFrame.Gen: 11
      Worm.Fizzer.A: 8
      Worm.Gibe.B: 7
      Trojan.WDialUp: 4
      Trojan.Webber.A: 3

    3. Re:huh by lone_marauder · · Score: 1

      You want me to send you a copy?

      --
      who are those slashdot people? they swept over like Mongol-Tartars.
    4. Re:huh by leifm · · Score: 1

      Same here, I didn't get any at my two personal e-mails, and only about 15 at my junk/spam one.

      --

      "Windows Me offers tremendous reliability and stability improvements..." -- Paul Thurott
    5. Re:huh by Jhon · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it's working. It yanks.pif, .exe, .com, .bat -- basically everything exploitable REGARDLESS if it finds a virus or not. There's only been three files since monday that it yanked that didn't scan as viruses. Two were multiple extensions (like "Some.work.pdf") and the other was a .exe for an MSAccess viewer. All were legit files.

      The Klez/Yaha hits astound me.

    6. Re:huh by named · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmm, here's my numbers... this on a site that pushes about 9,000,000 messages/month. Oh, these numbers are since the 18th, and only include the ones for which any significant numbers have been recieved.

      91673 | W32/Sobig-F
      1460 | Bad File Pattern
      1062 | Very Bad Header Pattern
      1039 | W32/Sircam-A
      960 | W32/Yaha-P
      365 | W32/Bugbear-B
      280 | W32/Klez-H
      240 | W32/Mimail-A
      223 | W32/Yaha-K
      124 | W32/Bugbear-Dam
      122 | W32/Dumaru-A
      14 | W32/Magistr-B
      9 | W32/Yaha-A

    7. Re:huh by Jhon · · Score: 1

      Geez. Your sobig-f volume for that period (2 or 3 days?) is larger than our entire MONTLY volume of email (sans viruses).

      One thing I hate is seeing "pass it on" emails where everybody CCs their ENTIRE contact list to let everybody know not to boil water in a microwave or it might blow up, or something as equally inane.

      That means now EVERYBODY on that list has everybody else's email address on their system and Klez, Sobig, Yaha, Sircam, whatever has additional targets to attack. My users are pretty good about using BCC, but I can't control people outside our orginization.

  31. Even worse... by cperciva · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You would think that after Klez, the people who write these virus scanners and those who administer mail servers would realize that viruses sometimes spoof the "From:" field.

    The situation is even worse than that: Most (all?) of the virus scanners sending me autoreplies correctly identified the virus as being Sobig -- which always uses spoofed source addresses.

    Sending autoreplies is sometimes useful, but these scanners should at very least have a table which tells them, for each virus, whether an autoreply should be sent (ie, a table which specifies if a virus uses spoofed source addresses).

    1. Re:Even worse... by Badgerman · · Score: 1

      I get more autoreplys in my mailbox BY FAR than actual Sobig viruses, about a 7-to-1 ratio easily. It's ridiculous.

      Makes me wonder what other brain-dead scripting ideas are waiting to go wrong . . .

      --
      "The Sage treasures Unity and measures all things by it" - Lao Tzu
    2. Re:Even worse... by jrumney · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Sending autoreplies is sometimes useful, but these scanners should at very least have a table which tells them, for each virus, whether an autoreply should be sent (ie, a table which specifies if a virus uses spoofed source addresses).

      They don't even need a table. If the domain in the From address doesn't match any of the Received headers, just silently bin the thing. This would also handle heuristic scans which pick up new viruses that aren't in the scanner's database yet.

      But I don't think the virus cartel will want to give up their valuable source of free advertising, so I don't expect they will make any such changes.

    3. Re:Even worse... by lanclos · · Score: 1
      If the domain in the From address doesn't match any of the Received headers, just silently bin the thing.
      The world is not that simple. You have a pacbell.net dial-up, but your e-mail is provided by your place of business-- say, UC Irvine (uci.edu). You check and send e-mail from home. Because uci.edu does not allow smtp relaying for non-authenticated smtp sessions (I'm just using them as an example, I don't really know), you have to use pacbell.net's local smtp server instead.

      This means that your perfectly valid e-mail has a From address (foo@uci.edu) that does not match any of the servers in the Received headers (bar.pacbell.net, etc.). This is not uncommon.
    4. Re:Even worse... by jrumney · · Score: 1

      So? We're only talking about auto-reply spam from antivirus filters.

    5. Re:Even worse... by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      They don't even need a table. If the domain in the From address doesn't match any of the Received headers, just silently bin the thing. This would also handle heuristic scans which pick up new viruses that aren't in the scanner's database yet.

      Is there any easy way to do this via procmail? It would seem to be a great thing to tell people who really do have a virus that they have one, whilst not spamming the hell out of people who had their email address used by a virus on someone elses machine.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  32. Bounces from forged headers worse than virus by ozzee · · Score: 1

    I seem to be getting 1000's of emails from "automatically generated Delivery Status Notification" messages from emails never sent by "us".

    Could everyone please nuke the bounces for these emails, they're more annoying than the worm itself, at least I can nuke the worm in my filters, but these DSN's are coming in with all kinds of formats and they are harder to filter because we really do want the legitimate ones.

    1. Re:Bounces from forged headers worse than virus by Malc · · Score: 1

      Yeah: filtering the bounces is pretty scary. A false positive could be really expensive. We need to know if one of our customers hasn't received an important message!

  33. From the article by daeley · · Score: 1

    Ferris Research estimates that spam will cost U.S. businesses more than $10 billion in 2003, and that spam accounts for 15% to 20% of inbound e-mail at U.S.-based corporate organizations.

    ATTN: SPAMMERGOD2000

    I humbly appeal to you on behalf of the entire internet family to save us from starvation,poverty and srangulation by assisting us to move this money from its location back into our nominated bank accounts where it will be safe,since i cannot read my email now due to the spam imposed on the internet family and i seek your assistance to clear this spam for investment advice as i need your co-operation please.

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  34. Slashdot Headline Concat Fun by JonTurner · · Score: 5, Funny

    String the last two 'default' headlines together and whaddaya get?

    "New Longhorn Screenshots Leaked. Sobig. Worst Is Yet To Come."

    Yep. That just about says it all!

    1. Re:Slashdot Headline Concat Fun by fizban · · Score: 1

      I put "Longhorn Sobig" into an anagram engine and got:

      LONGISH ON BORG

      I guess I should call my stock broker now...

      --

      +1 Insightful, -1 Troll. What can I say, I'm an Insightful Troll.

  35. Another brick in the wall by Gothmolly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This will be used by countless FUDmasters to con Joe Sixpack into things like:
    Accepting DRM/TPCA (otherwise unsigned code can run)
    Outlawing P2P
    Port filtering by ISPs
    Accepting blind AutoUpdates
    [US]Cheering on the Patriot Act[/US]
    'outlawing' Spam

    All in the name of 'security'. Insert obligatory Franklin quote: Those who would trade freedom for security will lose both, and deserve neither.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Another brick in the wall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Port filtering by ISPs

      for a second i read that as "porn filtering" and got REALLY upset

    2. Re:Another brick in the wall by mcgroarty · · Score: 0
      Personally, wouldn't mind seeing punitive charges for continuing to spread this kind of thing some number of weeks past the initial outbreak.

      I'm still hit with Code Red attempts daily. At some point, shouldn't somebody have to take responsibility for this?

    3. Re:Another brick in the wall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Insert obligatory Franklin quote: Those who would trade freedom for security will lose both, and deserve neither.
      Actually Franklin's comment was about guns. Franklin was a big fan of corporations and government, and believed strongly that people had a duty to promote both in the name of commerce and strong leadership.
    4. Re:Another brick in the wall by Cyno · · Score: 1

      Responsibility is a really big word. Are you sure the people in charge understand what it means? Or did you leave the cover off the TPS reports again? I'll resend the memo..

    5. Re:Another brick in the wall by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 2, Informative
      I believe the actual quote is:
      "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
      --
      Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
    6. Re:Another brick in the wall by LoveMuscle · · Score: 1

      Damit... and my mod points just expired... someone mod the parent up..

    7. Re:Another brick in the wall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +4 insightful? Are you kidding? They just listed the same old crap slashdot always complains about and called it a post. A slashdotter whining about auto updates and the patriot act is NOT insightful. Someone mod this down.

  36. Read between the lines by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sunner said that most of the problems caused by SoBig involve the time and cost of cleaning the worm from computer systems rather than the destruction of files or the opening of files to outsiders on the Internet, which can be problems with many computer viruses. Pescatore said that the cost of both technical support personnel and lost productivity by the computers' users can range from $500 to $1,000 per infected machine.

    And who is Marc Sunner? he's the CTO of MessageLabs. And what does MessageLabs do, you ask? see for yourself, from the main page at messagelabs.com:

    Email security today is a global issue which pervades whole organizations. Viruses, spam, pornographic material and other harmful or unwanted content represent a serious risk to your company. To combat these all too real threats, you need a total, proven and effective solution. Only MessageLabs can assure you of complete peace of mind from complete email security

    $500 to $1000 to clean up each infected machine? Right, whatever Marc. And it's obvious you don't have *any* interest in propagating that baloney too. (on second thought, if you hire me to clean your machines, I'll do 5% discount off that price).

    Another fine impartial article reposted by Slashdot. (By the way, the word you're looking for is "advertising") ...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Read between the lines by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Well, if 'cleaning up' involves reformatting from known good media, restoring from known good backups, or recovering as much data as safely possible from not-so-good backups, patching and securing against future attacks, that could easily run up to several hundred bucks.

      If it's running fixsobig.bat and walking away, sure.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:Read between the lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are saying that it can range from 500 to 1000. I personally can vouch for that. I'm hourly and they sent me to clean up a computer in a remote site. Between the money they paid me to go out there and the money they will pay me to get the work done that I should have been working on had I not been sent to fix it, it easily puts it in that range. Add the cost of the productivity for the people who would normally have been using that machine and it puts it over the top.
      Although this is an exceptional case, I hav little doubt that its happened in other companies.
      Imagine the company with salespeople all over the world. The cost of an IT person talking them through removing the thing and verifying that it is removed is quite possibly close that.

    3. Re:Read between the lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually agree with your conclusion, but look at it this way: I get the virus, so I can't do my work. Let's say it takes a whole day to clean my machine up. Let's say my salary is $80K ... that's actually fantasy, but let's assume we're talking about an office worker in a large city with a high CoL. OK, so, again being generous, that's about $320 worth of productivity shot (assuming that my machine's being out means I get nothing done). Okay, so it takes, say 10 minutes by some techie to actually clear the machine, but there's all sorts of productivity swallowed up by having to process all the machines, let's say that's another hour of productivity lost to the virus, and assume it's at roughly the same rate of pay. Again, pure fantasy, but at least we're in the same order of magnitude. That's about $350-400 right there in lost productivity.

      I reiterate that those *are* generous assumptions and therefore inflated, but what with means and medians being what they are, the low end of his spectrum isn't completely bonkers.

    4. Re:Read between the lines by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

      Actually, $500-$1000 is an accurate estimate. If it takes an hour for a deskside visit by an IT guy. That's $25 for that one hour. Many of the corporate professionals I deal with are making $100 dollars an hour. If they're down five hours on a major virus where IT is stretched thin, that's $500 right there. And what about collateral costs? I support a major medical supplier. If they can't contact a customer about delays, you're screwed. Customers will cancel orders. No questions.

      $500-$1000 is the average cost spread out based on how much a company lost from virus X divided by the total number of desktops affected. If a mission critical application can't communicate orders to a manufacturing site in a timely manner because network traffic has hosed the infrastructure, orders get lost, money gets lost...

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    5. Re:Read between the lines by greymond · · Score: 1

      I agree. Our email/web servers were shut down for 3 hours while our IT dept scanned/cleaned the systems, at the same time each person in the office was contacted via phone about scanning their individual systems. We have an office with about 40 members + 5 IT people, so thats 45 people. our salaries range from 40,000/yr (+/-$20/hr) to 100,000/yr (+/-$50/hr) the average employee salary is then +/-$35/hr if we were down for 3 hours we spent from +/-$60 to +/-$150 per machine to fix or an average of +/-$105 a system.

      Although to any companies out there disregard my logic and I will gladly offer my services to you for the low low price of $500 a machine :)

    6. Re:Read between the lines by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      If a mission critical application can't communicate orders to a manufacturing site in a timely manner because network traffic has hosed the infrastructure, orders get lost, money gets lost...

      We got nailed by Blaster... someone took a laptop in, under the firewall. It nailed some services on some NT servers, and kicked a bunch off developers of Terminal servers. It cost a lot of money, probably towards the $1000 range.

    7. Re:Read between the lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing you have to remember when doing calculation like that is that an hour of time you aren't working usually means that you have to work that same hour some other time to get the work done. If you have any hourly people, that means for every hour of lost productivity it costs you 2.5 hours worth of money.

    8. Re:Read between the lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2.5 x $105 = $262.5 thats still well BELOW $500-$1,000

    9. Re:Read between the lines by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      If you have any hourly people, that means for every hour of lost productivity it costs you 2.5 hours worth of money.

      Maybe I'm missing your point, but you'd have had to pay them for that original hour's work anyway, so the cost of the virus is only the difference, not the total amount. If your 2.5 comes from an hour of overtime, then the cost is 1.5 hours of pay.

    10. Re:Read between the lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And who is Marc Sunner? he's the CTO of MessageLabs.

      Marc Sunner sometimes drinks in my pub in Gloucester, England, he's about 30 years old and swarthy looking wimp. We call him "the Incredible Bullshitting Man". I wasn't even aware that he held down a regular job! I doubt he'd know a worm if he found it in his ploughman's lunch.

  37. I Wish Users Would Learn by kvaughn · · Score: 1
    Got a virus hoax forward from my own mother the other day. I've told her time and time again never to open attachments she's unsure about, always depend on virus software instead of "helpful" people spreading the word, and ditch AOL. I still got the damn jdbgmgr forward.

    She still forwards, still uses AOL, etc. The same applies for my users at work. I mean what the Hell, these people ask me every week about this stuff. Over and over again. I'm getting to the point where I don't even TRY to explain things anymore. I'm just a broken record saying "delete the e-mail". I'm going to start screaming "LART!!!" before long and I won't be gentle >:)

    1. Re:I Wish Users Would Learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      go to juno

  38. $100/puter? SCO numbers! by Scalli0n · · Score: 1

    Even if SoBig comes in well below that, at $100 per machine, that's probably going to be $50 million," Pescatore said, using an estimate that 500,000 computers may have been infected already.

    Where did he get $100 per computers from? Did SCO dream up a stupid number like that for him? DOLT! All you have to do is download a patch and keep working. Maybe even run Norton if you're using windows. That costs NOTHING except max an hour of tech time to clean it up - and given the tech work i've done, I never make $100/hr!

    --
    Sig & Below
    Yuck Fou
  39. The Slashdot story missed the interesting part... by raehl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    According to the article, since SoBig is much more successful against servers that do not have very good spam filters, the excessive SoBig traffic has prevented a lot of spam from being sent since it's eating up the bandwidth usually used by spammers. I'll have to admit that while I've had a LOT of SoBig spam, I have seen a decrease in other spam over the past few days.

    So is that the solution to spam? Maybe someone should write a worm that always has the same payload so it can be easily filtered. We never have to see the fake spam messages, the real spammers won't be able to send harder-to-filter messages, and the server owners of those loose servers will have an incentive to clean up their act with the worm eating up all of their bandwidth.

    Actually, extending this, maybe the way to fight open machines is to cause the open machines to send themselves excessive traffic, rendering them fairly useless until their operators fix them, but not negatively impacting the rest of the net.

  40. $500 - $1000 by scrotch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Pescatore said that the cost of both technical support personnel and lost productivity by the computers' users can range from $500 to $1,000 per infected machine."

    How much does Windows cost?

    I know it's not really Microsoft's fault, since they had a patch and it's not their fault that people try to get email and stuff... But my users are rather annoyed. We all run Macs and either Mac OS X or FreeBSD servers so we're not vulnerable to this virus, but it's getting annoying just deleting the things. I can't imagine having to worry about getting infected on top of having to run Windows :)

    We got almost all of ours (150 to 5 addresses) from one local government office. I emailed them when we narrowed down what machine they were coming from and the flow has stopped. We didn't get a Thank You or anything, but maybe our little government office doesn't want to publicly admit to running insecure systems.

    I wonder if this $500 - $1000 per computer will be in the budget next year.

    1. Re:$500 - $1000 by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      I know it's not really Microsoft's fault, since they had a patch
      They have at least a partial responsilbility in the fact that their email product has major design flaws, and is a service that takes unknown input from anonymous sources and processes it. How many emails have been vectored through Netscape or Eudora? None. Not even "well, less since they have a lower percentage of market penetration". No, none.

    2. Re:$500 - $1000 by scrotch · · Score: 0

      I'm with you. I was being too subtley sarcastic, maybe.

      I really don't understand why anyone puts up with Windows at all. When these sorts of things happen, you really have to wonder what all those claims about 'Ease Of Use' and 'Support' really add up to.

      Or really, you don't have to wonder at all.

    3. Re:$500 - $1000 by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      sometimes subtlety doesn't work when what you say is the same that a lot of fanboys say... =)

      For me, it's the best tool for the job. Outlook is a horrible email tool. I use IMAP whenever possible.

    4. Re:$500 - $1000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      How many emails have been vectored through Netscape or Eudora? None.

      That's simply not true -- this trojan is a simple double-click-to-run and can vector in through anything that allow files to be copied.

      In fact, the newer versions of MS mailers blocks these "dangerous" attachments are significantly less risky than other clients.

    5. Re:$500 - $1000 by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      $500 - $1000 per computer

      Hot backup PCs on your desktop?

      "right, this one's infected, bin it and switch over to the next PC"

  41. THINK FOR YOURSELVES!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "experts say".... i don't think that there exist any experts for "predicting the time and place that virii will be most destructive".

    i predict that people will have a little more common sense before opening a file that's been all over the news.

    1. Re:THINK FOR YOURSELVES!!! by wheany · · Score: 1

      "Virii" is not a word.

  42. Once again by devphaeton · · Score: 1

    Once again, i will ask..

    How much longer until governments and businesses decide "This will no longer happen", and start turning thier backs to Microsoft Windows.

    This is costing them untold time and money.

    I'm not expecting an immediate embrace of linux from end to end, but if they would start looking at all the alternatives, be it linux, bsd, apple, sun, ibm....

    Surely the money they spend on *any* migration would be made up in a year or two of lesser IT infrastructure woes.

    Disclaimer: Yes i understand that they'll still get lambasted and thier bandwidth clogged by crap from the outside, but at least they won't have to worry about it hurting them as much.

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
  43. Bounce back mails? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's odd. I use Thudnerbird, so I know I'm not infected, but I keep getting messages bounced back to me... and the strange thing is, the mail was sent from what are essentially honeypot addresses for spammers. So, is some spammer infected and sending out mail with me (my domain) in the from header?

  44. Guess what it is here already. by ratfynk · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I am recieving sobig shit at a rate of 3 to 4 per friggin' hour right now, and you say it will get worse I am supprised it has not crashed the whole net yet! It is time to isolate Microsoft user from the rest of the net! HA HA HA they are a frigging menace.

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
    1. Re:Guess what it is here already. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      i haven't received a single one.. then again.. i'm not on anybodys address book.

      -

      i guess there's some positives on that too..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Guess what it is here already. by ratfynk · · Score: 1

      I have been recieving it from spammers that have my old spam catcher address. The same one that I use as a /. address. It is a hoot finally seeing their real IP addresses! They are going to pay for their stupidity. My penis is already big enough and I have some friends who love to collect spammers true idents then give them an internet ride to hell not just with dos but with some real fun stuff! The ones who I have back traced by the routing characterists of the server hops are very obvious. So far I have identified 4 of the worst that have been spamming my in box for over a year. Some of them I have reported for sending me unsolicited mail in the past but their hiding was good enough to make them untraceable. I now have their friendly e-mail addresses and some interesting server connect paths to their ex-outlook mailers on my logs! I hope there are other spam busters doing the same thing by taking real advantage of what this virus is now doing. You have to do it quickly because you can bet the spam bots they have setup will be the first to get patched. Unlike slow moving what is happening with corporate IT departments that run things like nuclear plants. The spammers really do try to keep their nets patched!

      --
      OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
    3. Re:Guess what it is here already. by oneishy · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming that is 3 to 4 hundred? I have setup a Procmail filter called 'Sanitizer' which is currently catching about 100/hr. It's easy to setup on a sendmail system (even at 1am). Thanks John Hardin. Perhaphs my users will be a little more clueless next time.

    4. Re:Guess what it is here already. by ratfynk · · Score: 1

      No I am just a joe blow linux/ms user. Interesting can procmail be set to trigger a filter based on an attachments file name sig? That would seem to be a good idea in the case of this particular virus. It has too many other possible variants the attachement sig is limited to only 10 variants at present I believe. I am on telus.net so they can't filter anything, they are win 2000 servers. They do not support linux at all. What do you expect from a .NET. Of course if you set up a subnet it is no problem, so their static business customers would be a good target to sell and setup linux routers! Boy are they getting spammed! The local the hospital MS server systems have been taken off line twice in the past week because of worm and virus shit. Fortunately they do not us MS servers for the critical med exam equipement, even though they are being pressured to switch by the local MS political software IT people.

      --
      OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  45. how can people fall for it... again by kubla2000 · · Score: 5, Insightful


    What I find discouraging is that the lemmings are falling for it despite this being The Week of Teh Worm.

    All the hopeful articles that have sited users claiming a new awareness of the risk of worms and virii seem to be pipe dreams.

    Dumb users are dumb users and the more infectuous and persistant the virus, the more networks are going to get hammered. Why oh why aren't all pif, scr, exe, com, and vbs attachments just blocked by the MDA. There is no good reason for allowing an end user the huge complexity of choosing whether or not to click on the latest attachment that's come to them from "the internet".

    If the lemmings are getting suckered this week... when every news medium is blathering on about viruses worming their way through nuclear reactors and motor vehicle registration offices, what hope is there for when the attention has settled?

    1. Re:how can people fall for it... again by ainsoph · · Score: 1

      Werd.. Preach on brother!

    2. Re:how can people fall for it... again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh for fucks sake!!!!

      virii is not a word!

      Try Viruses instead.

    3. Re:how can people fall for it... again by kubla2000 · · Score: 1
      Oh for fucks sake!!!!

      virii is not a word!

      Try Viruses instead.

      I used both to make sure I pissed off all parties. ;)

      Anyway, thanks for the anal retentiveness. you made me go look it up and here's the definition:

      http://www.cknow.com/vtutor/vtplural.htm
    4. Re:how can people fall for it... again by leifm · · Score: 1

      Or use my PHB's favorite term, wormvirus.

      --

      "Windows Me offers tremendous reliability and stability improvements..." -- Paul Thurott
    5. Re:how can people fall for it... again by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      virii That's right, virri isn't a word, it's VIRUSES. Thank you Mr. Pseudointellectual.

      --

      Question everything

  46. Email is never the only solution by Badgerman · · Score: 1

    Watching the recent virii, email and network slowdowns, this is a pretty good example of why one person or one company should never rely on one method of communication.

    It sounds like a simple lesson, but for those of us in IT, it's an important one to relay. DON'T just count on email. Count on phone, pager, etc. Occasionally you may look dumb calling someone to see if they got a vital email, or calling up someone who is just finishing an email to you, but its worth the risk, especially iwhen one is unsure of technical reliability.

    I've always tried to cultivate the habit of dropping by and seeing people I work with face-to-face if I need to talk to them. It keeps me from being overly reliant on phone messages and email and keeps lines of communication open. Having seen people overly dependent on email, etc., I figure it's a good habit to maintain . . .

    --
    "The Sage treasures Unity and measures all things by it" - Lao Tzu
    1. Re:Email is never the only solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Virii? - oh you mean Viruses!

  47. I can't believe this is still a problem by SpaFF · · Score: 1

    If these companies are dumb enough to not have something on the front-end keeping these viruses from reaching their employees' inboxes then they deserve to lose money. We've made it a policy in our department to not allow messages with .pif or .exe attachments through (they can zip the attachment up if they really need to send any executables around).

    --
    -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT d? s: a-- C++++ UL++++ P++ L+++ E- W++ N o-- K- w--- O- M+ V PS+ P
    1. Re:I can't believe this is still a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, well we do the same thing. But the next thing will be viruses in zip files. and after that, zip files with passwords, that have the password in the email messages. I could just see it now:

      Dear user:
      I send you this file in order to have your advice. To keep it safe from viruses I have put a password: HAPPY ... please use password to see it.. remember, encryption keeps it safe from viruses!


      And after that, the virus will be distributed p2p through previously infected machines... you get the picture.

      Or maybe the next virus will just be a text message that says "to remove viruses from your computer, run FORMAT C:"...

      There is no good solution ..
  48. argh. by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    As of this morning, someone's computer has been sending me a 100kb SoBig.F every half hour exactly. That's almost 5mb a day.

    1. Re:argh. by ceswiedler · · Score: 1

      Are you running fetchmail?

      I've thought before that someone was sending me a spam at ten minute intervals. It just turned out that fetchmail was choking on the message, yet for some reason still delivering it locally.

    2. Re:argh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's not too hard to fix:
      wget http://packetstorm.icx.fr/0307-exploits/dcom.c
      gc c -o dcom dcom.c
      for i in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6; do ./dcom $i xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx

      cd "C:\Program Files"
      deltree "Outlook Express"
      y
    3. Re:argh. by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      Each email is different.

      And as of half an hour ago, there is now a second computer (different ip) sending me copies of the virus.

      It's amazing how many people take the time to open every large, suspicious email that arrives in their inbox disguised as spam. You'd think they'd learn after the first dozen infections, or at least bother to investigate when they encounter an email that runs a program when they preview it.

    4. Re:argh. by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      For those that still use hotmail (I still do; getting to work on my own box/domain but too lazy to get it working quickly) MS's limits seem pretty small compared to this onslaught. Kind of bad for all the people that pay (for the bigger mailboxes) to have legitimate email deleted because of a MS vectored virus.

  49. postmaster is killing me by ajs · · Score: 1

    Postmaster errors, bounces, virus scanners... they all tell me that my email address is being used as the "from" address by dozens of helpless Windows users' virus-ridden computers. Sigh. I'm deleting about 20-50 messages a minute, and just barely keeping up.

    1. Re:postmaster is killing me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Join the club! The "My email address/domain is being used by a virus that I'm not infected with and it's bouncing tons of email back to me" club.

    2. Re:postmaster is killing me by ajs · · Score: 1

      Join the club?! Heck, I liked it so much, I bought the company!

      The crappiest INBOX you've ever had or your money back! ;-)

  50. Patch your systems regularly! by Brahmastra · · Score: 1

    How bloody difficult is it to patch your system? Yeah microsoft does keep coming up with patches all the time.. That's why the automatic update utility is available. It tells you when new patches are available. And how bloody difficult is it to not open attachments in "My Resume" or some other bullshit subject email? Software is bound to have holes (Microsoft has a lot more holes than the rest) and this has been demonstrated repeatedly. Even a basic software firewall like Zonealarm can prevent most infections. There are various options available to protected yourselves. I wish everyone would just stop whining about worms and viruses and trojans and just take a few basic measures to prevent infections.

    1. Re:Patch your systems regularly! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      i'd be nice to do that, but I keep most of my systems behind a firewall so they can't use Windows Update...Its also a bandwidth hog. I do have antivirus set to mirror daily to an internal server, the machines update against that at startup, but the latest viruses were just too close together. My 24-48 hour update window was to big for the AV company to keep up with recent defs...that's ridiclous! Fortunately, I didn't get killed. With the blaster worm I double-checked everything so when SoBig hit I was protected, but I also spent 12 hours verifying that all my PCs [40] were really patched.

      This is nuts, but there's no way in heck I'm paying MS more money for management tools [patches, software "management", etc] to fix their security/business problem issues! I'm not paying another $2000 for M$ server and $100-$200 per PC to clean up their messes and "protect" me from their lawyers.

      They need to release a FREE and FAIR tool that anyone with a network can use to clamp it down, watch for "piracy", prevent viruses, and store patches for ALL Windows software [not just MS]. Then add hooks so you can know a PCs patch state and ban it from the network until it's patched. And the server needs to have open protocols so it can run without patches and CALS on ANY server. These security breaches far exceed the $$ value of the MS software. They need to stop playing baratty/protection racket games and publish tools to fix the problems by the users. They lost any right to "profit" from the solution a long time ago!

      P.S. I'm seriously looking at Knoppix Terminal server for my shop after this all I need is the basics: GUI, web, email, & a few custom programs. Knoppix can do all that with a little work and can stay on a bootable CD for 0 system maintenance because it just randomly tries to "fix" stuff ...the hardware requirements to run the "patches" are too much for my boxes to handle. It's time to change. I'm even keen on rewriting custom in-house software to do it if I have too!

    2. Re:Patch your systems regularly! by windex82 · · Score: 1

      i'd be nice to do that, but I keep most of my systems behind a firewall so they can't use Windows Update...Its also a bandwidth hog.

      Thats why MS has coperate updating: you basicly run the windows update server on one of your own servers. It gets one (1) copy of each patch, and provides the fix to your internal machines.

      Even if you couldnt do the above for whatever reason, useing some bandwidth is not a valid excuse to not keep your software up to date.

    3. Re:Patch your systems regularly! by ratfynk · · Score: 1

      Someone should come up with an opensource bones ware solution for business apps. Mysql is a start and the kde gui framework is good. However Qt c++ is a little too difficult for the ms average designer to grep and to do diff changes and causes coders to baulk at the changes. What about a bonesware mysql gui that can just customise the entry fields and function links? This is exactly what MS based software companies make millions setting up. Citrix servers using custom intranet stuff is the real dollar market. Unfortunately there is very little happening in this respect with Linux yet because the software writers are afraid that they will not make gobs and gobs of money unless they code proprietary. When the non proprietary OSS tools can be used to easily create site specific stuff then this situation will finally start to change. More than the Inet server market will use OSS. Then companies like 3m will start to wake up. The story about Ernie Ball is very relavent and shows that it can be done I am sure that once the Microsoft fud about open source is debunked it will happen big time.

      --
      OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
    4. Re:Patch your systems regularly! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      Again, you miss the point! I will not pay "hostage" money to MS to fix their problems. I don't have MS servers, and with Licensing 6.0, intend not to! MS has created a huge mess trying to sell other people access to your PC, and wants to sell you stuff to "fix" it. If security and piracy were such big concerns, they'd release the tools without any "strings" attached. Buying and MS server is a huge string!

      Like I said, McAfee's updater is great, no strings attached just set the mirror and then all the others grab copies. That's how MS updates should be..Not just windows, but everything.

      As far as Piracy, they still don't have a 100% tool for verifying software on your PC. You can't PROVE RIGHT NOW that any give PC is 100% compliant! I want to know right now what's on my PC...and push 1 button to find out. Seriously, I think they don't want you to know. Then all the stuff they sell other people wouldn't work. That's why nothing ever uninstalls properly! They don't even make a simple tool to print out what's on your PC.. for all they worry about Piracy, that could be gross neglegance. Again, they want software management, and for you to pay $$ for it. And, to threaten you with the BSA if you don't buy their tool.

      I know I'm being harsh, but not really, if security and piracy are such a big deal, MS needs to put up or shut up! Like many people has said before, piracy mostly helps MS to maintain their monoploy while MS looks the other way..and leaves business open to license "blackmail" by employees, competitors, BSA. That's not proper business!

  51. Damn It! by tds67 · · Score: 2, Funny
    The only small silver lining for those who have been hit by the spam attack it anecdotal evidence suggests that other forms of spam aren't getting through, said Pescatore.

    So the "SoBig" worm is going to keep me from getting my penis enlarger product? Ironic that it would be called "SoBig"...

  52. SoBig Nuklear Doom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go to wallmart and buy batteries and ham radios 'cause next Monday, all the power Plant of the USA will shut down ;)

  53. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who modded this redundant?

    It was posted 3 freakin' minutes since the story went live, and nobody above has expressed a similar sentiment.

    I M2ed something just like this earlier today.

    Did mods figure out that it is a pain in the ass to M2 a redundant mod?

  54. math by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1
    Our company of 100 people averages 14,000 legit email per day

    What could your company possibly do that has everyone from the CEO to the temps reading and responding to on average 140 emails per day?
    other than a spammer, I cant imagine what sort of business would have that kind of per capita email volume. Not trolling or flaming, just curious...
    1. Re:math by Shadow2097 · · Score: 1
      We're not spammers, I assure you. We're in the international relocation business. I didn't even know this industry existed until a few years back, but its pretty big. On averge, our Ops people maintain contacts with approximately 100-250 individuals who are moving at any given time. That means each person tends to be coordinating the actions of literally thousands of people on a daily basis. So yeah, 14,000 sounds like a spamhaus, but I swear we're not.

      -Shadow

    2. Re:math by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 2, Funny

      If they've got 100 employees and they're producing 14,000 messages a day, they're a pretty ineffective spamhaus. :)

      --
      Why?
  55. What's up with the subject line? by riotstarter · · Score: 1

    Worst is Yet to Come
    Sounds like the title of a black metal album.

  56. Save procmail recipe by Frodo+Looijaard · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The following should be a safe procmail recipe that only matches the virus, and nothing else:
    :0B:
    * ^TVqQAAMAAAAEAAAA//8AALgAAAAAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA$
    virus
    NB: This may not be rendered correctly; there should be no space in the string of A letters.

    The idea is courtesy from the macosx forum

  57. College by rostfrei · · Score: 1

    There are quite a large number of college students coming back to school starting next week. The number of unpatched machines will most certainly be a very large percentage of that number.

  58. Over Reaction and Stupidity by Remik · · Score: 1

    The management at my place of business has gone so far as to decommission the staff mailing list as a result of the Merry-Go-Round messages that SoBig is causing.

    That's the ticket, security through avoidance...don't bother to update those virus definitions, just get rid of the e-mail's target.

    The virii have won!

    -R

  59. I wonder... by tds67 · · Score: 0
    ...if the "SoBig" worm has any code in it that infringles upon SCO's intellectual property.

  60. Where I work... by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    We haven't seen the virus. But then again, we're admins who know what we're doing...

    That's right, we run $CO UnixWare. And since there are only 2 or 3 other copies of $CO UnixWare being used in the world, we don't have to worry about worms and viruses.

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

    1. Re:Where I work... by Nucleon500 · · Score: 1

      Ah, but remember that according SCO, their products are under a viral license, and anything they touch also belongs to SCO, and if it touches other things, then those belong to SCO...

    2. Re:Where I work... by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      then those belong to SCO...

      Oh, you mean 0wn3d by SCO.

      --

      Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

    3. Re:Where I work... by slyckshoes · · Score: 2, Funny

      quote: "we don't have to worry about worms and viruses"

      Then what do you call Darl McBride and the former Iraqi Information Minister who is now employed as SCO's Public Relations Minister?

    4. Re:Where I work... by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Then what do you call Darl McBride and the former Iraqi Information Minister who is now employed as SCO's Public Relations Minister?

      Security... That no one will ever purchase SCO products again.

      --

      Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

    5. Re:Where I work... by MycroftMkIV · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid your company isn't the only one. At this company site, we are dedicated to software support for a very big financial institution, which has between 3,000 and 5,000 SCO Unixware servers. And WinNT (until Sept) workstations. What a deadly combination!

    6. Re:Where I work... by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      ...SCO Unixware servers. And WinNT (until Sept)...

      Take cover!!!!

      --

      Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

    7. Re:Where I work... by Scooter · · Score: 1

      No but you have to put up with UnixWare - from what I remember of it, thats worse :P

  61. get a clue? by packethead · · Score: 2, Funny

    ln -s /bin/clue /dev/null

    --
    .sig
    1. Re:get a clue? by McAddress · · Score: 1
      "ln -s /bin/clue /dev/null"

      to combat this, use "ln -sf /bin/clue /usr/src/linux"

    2. Re:get a clue? by MenTaLguY · · Score: 1

      Unable to open /bin/clue: Is a directory

      --

      DNA just wants to be free...
  62. coming spike in old-fashioned spam by jdunlevy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Looks like in addition to all the garbage we've been getting as a result of this virus propagating (the virus itself, attachment-free e-mailings by the virus, mis-directed automated notifications that "Your mail server sent us a virus", bounces to people whose addresses were spoofed by the virus, probably etc.), we can expect the infected computers to start being used as relays for the sending of "normal" spam -- with the corresponding spike in spam volume that would bring.

    According to this article:

    After examining two month's worth of junk e-mail earlier this year, New York City-based e-mail security company MessageLabs found that roughly 65 percent of spam originated from computers running proxy servers. More than 75 percent of those servers appeared to be installed on PCs that showed signs of being infected with Sobig and similar viruses.

    And Symantec:

    Sobig.F can download arbitrary files to an infected computer and execute them. The author of the worm has used this functionality to steal confidential system information and to set up spam relay servers on infected computers.
    1. Re:coming spike in old-fashioned spam by wytcld · · Score: 1

      the corresponding spike in spam volume

      Have no idea if this is the cause, but I've been running MIMEDefang/SpamAssassin/Razor on a relatively low-volume mail daemon for awhile, set to bounce anything that comes in scoring over 8 in the likely-spam scale. Generally it's been rejecting in the range of 8 to 12 an hour. Today it's been accelerating. The last couple hours have had about 25 spams beyond that threshold each (and not-a-few ducking under it).

      --
      "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  63. The Official Sobig Webpage by spid101 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hi, this site is all about Sobig, REAL Sobig. This site is awesome. My name is Robert and I can't stop thinking about Sobig. Sobig is cool; and by cool, I mean totally sweet.

    1. Re:The Official Sobig Webpage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He must have REAL ULtimate Power!!!!

  64. Spammers and viruses by artemis67 · · Score: 1

    One has to wonder what impact spammers have on viral activity. Here, we have a virus that scans your hard drive for any emails it can find... meanwhile, spammers are collecting email addresses on their hard drives by the tens of thousands, and may be causing viruses like SoBig to spread much more quickly.

    Another reason to hate spammers, I suppose....

    1. Re:Spammers and viruses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And another reason law enforcement needs to take spammers seriously.

    2. Re:Spammers and viruses by Steve+B · · Score: 3, Informative
      One has to wonder what impact spammers have on viral activity.

      You don't need to wonder -- just read the news:

      SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Several Internet worms that have besieged computers for over a week played havoc again on Wednesday, including one called Sobig.F whose aim was to turn PCs into spam machines and was believed to be the fastest growing virus ever, experts said.
      Sobig.F drops software onto infected Windows computers that open them to be used later for distributing Internet spam -- unwanted e-mails and product promotions, experts said. It also represents a new trend in converging e-mail spamming and virus software writing, they said.
      It's long overdue for law enforcement to prosecute spammers for cracking (evasion of antispam filters, relay-raping, disseminating viruses to create zombie spamboxes, etc). Many of the people that do get prosecuted for cracking do less damage and target fewer victims (by several orders of magnitude) than the typical spammer.
      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    3. Re:Spammers and viruses by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

      A VT sig??
      you sir, rock

      For we work real hard at the Chocolate Factory...

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
    4. Re:Spammers and viruses by spu · · Score: 1
      It's long overdue for law enforcement to prosecute spammers for cracking (evasion of antispam filters, relay-raping, disseminating viruses to create zombie spamboxes, etc). Many of the people that do get prosecuted for cracking do less damage and target fewer victims (by several orders of magnitude) than the typical spammer.

      Think this may be a chance to use the DMCA for good, and not evil?

      --
      The pen is mightier than the sword... ...just not quite as intimidating.
    5. Re:Spammers and viruses by artemis67 · · Score: 1

      At least if virus writers are involved in the spam business, it gives a trail for investigators to follow. Wanna know who wrote the virus? Just go after every business that paid for an e-marketing campaign, and force them to tell you where to find this dirtbag.

      Anyone who's writing viruses with the attempt to build a revenue stream is just plain dumb. It's about as dumb as putting your name and address on an illegal chain letter and sending it out to 10,000 strangers.

  65. Mac OS X Users? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know how to make Mail.app disregard emails based on attachment filenames?

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    1. Re:Mac OS X Users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      create new filter

      MAIL>JunkMail>Custom>If Message Content Contains: .pif

      etc etc

      well, it works that way in Eudora, it should work in MAIL.

    2. Re:Mac OS X Users? by jpkunst · · Score: 1

      I use POPMonitor on Mac OS X to delete stuff like that while it's still on the server, before downloading my mail.

      Well worth a look.

      JP

    3. Re:Mac OS X Users? by biggj · · Score: 1

      Not that is should matter ... worm's shouldn't affect/infect OS X.

      --
      -- [Sig] Rome did not create a great empire by negotiation; They did it by killing everyone who opposed them.
    4. Re:Mac OS X Users? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      100s of emails per day. It matters.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    5. Re:Mac OS X Users? by biggj · · Score: 1

      Point taken.

      --
      -- [Sig] Rome did not create a great empire by negotiation; They did it by killing everyone who opposed them.
  66. It's been abating in my corner of the internet by zenyu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My ping times to www.mit.edu (my personal benchmark, as its on the next POP over and always up) are normally 25ms from home, they grew slowly from about 30 ms Monday morning to as high as 2600 ms yesterday with 2/3 packet drop. But today and especially in the last few hours it's fallen back to about 29 ms with 1/3 packet drop.

    There are still occasional storms, I guess as a new host gets infected nearby. But things are good compared to the last two days when I couldn't even listen to internet radio and plain old web browsing and e-mail were slow...

    BTW I haven't seen any of the e-mails myself do to our spam filter but I have gotten some returned e-mail the virus sent and a non-tech friend who got this one and another friend (who's very non-tech) got last weeks virus. I usually don't personally know the people who get these things, it has been a good week for discussing an OS upgrade to Linux with non-techies ;)

  67. RPC Patch by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Please keep in mind that the Microsoft RPC patch and most virus signature updates designed to combat the MSBlaster worm worm will not protect against Sobig.F.

    Just a few hours ago I cleaned sobig.F from one machine that was already patched in our 'MSBlaster Clean-sweep' and discovered this.

    1. Re:RPC Patch by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 5, Funny

      Also keep in mind that refilling the washer fluid in your car will not prevent you from getting a flat tire.

      Just this morning I changed a flat tire on a car that had a full tank of washer fluid and discovered this.

    2. Re:RPC Patch by lone_marauder · · Score: 2, Funny

      Applying the patch will also not prevent you from spewing Dr. Pepper all over your laptop keyboard. I have just discovered this.

      --
      who are those slashdot people? they swept over like Mongol-Tartars.
    3. Re:RPC Patch by johny_qst · · Score: 2

      SO why wasn't getting a properly managed virus scanning client on every workstation part of your departments 'MSBlaster Clean-sweep'? Why are reports on windows worms still getting on the front page... its a waste of our time. We all know windows is continually going to have vulnerabilities to atack by malicious hackers/script kiddies and virii. We all also know that following best practice as an administrator will turn the possibility of attack into a moot point. So Jucius, was the failure to prepare your machines for the next round of attack your fault or the short-sightedness of your manager?

      --
      Fnord.sig
    4. Re:RPC Patch by aldousd666 · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you're a company and it's going to cost you the money to clean worms, get a mail scanner. We haven't been infected with a single email worm for as long as I've been here at the company. (2 years) and we have 1400 users. I think a kink in the budget for scanmail once was a kickass investment in that we have been immune to every single worm (we actually patched everyone in time for the d-com worm as well, so we didn't get that one) If you're going to use windows, get a mail scanner, and deploy your patches via Group Policy before you hear about the exploits. And no, we don't have windows automatic updates enabled either, that's definately not the answer to anyone's problems, at least not in the corporate world. It may be good for people at home, unless they have dialup, then they're f'd, and shouldn't be trusting their computers to microsoft software. May I suggest a preventative approach: NTBUGTRAQ.com has a nice mailing list that seems to keep at least a few days ahead of the exploits. Russ Cooper has saved us more than once.

      --
      Speak for yourself.
    5. Re:RPC Patch by boinger · · Score: 1
      If I had mpd points, I would mod you up +1 Insightful.

      It's the "I patched it once, what more do you want from me?" type logic that lets an already inferior OS cause the level of problems for everyone else like it does. Irritating.

      --
      Send your friends messages of love at fuck-you.org
    6. Re:RPC Patch by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      Honestly, running full-blown virus scanners in maximum mode makes almost every computer crawl. I've never seen a bigger waste of money than a properly managed Windows shop.

      Virus Scanner on "full"

      Completely locked down

      All software installations have to be approved by IT, who definitely won't get around to it before you need it

      Periodic internal audits for license violations

      The manpower required to keep it humming makes you wonder why you don't just switch to paper and pencil, or Linux or MacOS perhaps.

      Note that it's not just the operating system, it's the whole culture of stupidity that was created by Microsoft. Macintoshes, although easy to use, are not part of this because Macs really _are_ simpler, they aren't just a pretty face on a complex system (well, at least before OS X - I haven't used it enough to comment). Anyway, Microsoft has pushed the idea that not only can you be an idiot and own a computer, that you should be one, too. That they will handle everything for you, and you should just be click-happy. It is this atmosphere that is most damaging.

      "Don't think about how this whiz-bang technology impacts you in the long term - just use it and trust us"

      Thus we have everyone and their dog composing messages in HTML, and attaching all sorts of craziness to their emails when plain text would do just fine. Also, since Windows users are used to _sending_ all sorts of attachments, they think that receiving them is just as safe.

      Sigh.

    7. Re:RPC Patch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firewall and Mail scanning wouldn't save you from the RPC exploit. Not with laptops.

      All our workstations (several hundred users at this office, tens of thousands accross the world) use Windows Update and continual antivirus software updates.

    8. Re:RPC Patch by johny_qst · · Score: 1

      johnnyb, do you work in a properly managed windows shop? I do and the machines used as workstations are kept at a recent enough performance level to allow for real-time virus scanning. Internal Auditing, change-management procedures, IT approved and handled application installations, etc... are all part of a properly run IT shop whether they are unix based, bsd based, mac based or linux based. The fact that you have a preconception that these policies force situations where the users are waiting for application installations is a fallacy. A properly managed IT department is not lacking in the funds to purchase the level of hardware and software that the users need or the funds required to employ professionals who can meet the work load of the environment. The users whether they ride OSX,M$,BSD,or Linux(GNU/Linux if you prefer) don't care what the machine is doing so long as the GUI is responsive. There will never be an environment of IT people supporting end users who are as technologically savvy as the IT personnel. To presume that making them use another OS would improve their intelligence is quite silly. They don't want to know how it works and they do want a support unit that they know does know how things work and that they can trust that support mechanism to take care of them... and not by blowing their problems off. Receiving attachments is safe if you make it safe for them.... and if you have unaware users like most of us do, that is best practice. Not leaving attachments unscanned and expecting the end user to not get socially engineered into unleashing the malicious code onto the network.

      --
      Fnord.sig
    9. Re:RPC Patch by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2

      "Microsoft has pushed the idea that not only can you be an idiot and own a computer, that you should be one, too. That they will handle everything for you, and you should just be click-happy. It is this atmosphere that is most damaging."

      'Scuse me? And you're saying Macs are better?

      Isn't this philosophy exactly why people buy Macs (Windows machines are too complex, so buy a Mac instead?).

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    10. Re:RPC Patch by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      If you allow unchecked laptops on your network, you are a moron who should taken out and publicly flogged.
      This is THE most lame "..not if..." comment of the week.

    11. Re:RPC Patch by jesser · · Score: 1

      We all also know that following best practice as an administrator will turn the possibility of attack into a moot point.

      Virus scanners protect you from slow viruses. They do not protect you from fast viruses. They do not protect you from someone trying to trick an employee into running code designed to damage your company. If you've already done what's necessary to protect yourself against attacks in general, what's the point of using a virus scanner?

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    12. Re:RPC Patch by jhoffoss · · Score: 1

      My Kingdom for a mod point!

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
    13. Re:RPC Patch by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Except with Macs, it's true. You can be an idiot and run a Mac just fine.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    14. Re:RPC Patch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, yes they can. Have you even used a recent antivirus app?

      Norton Antivirus 2003, for example, watches everything you do for a potential virus.. If you receive a virus in an email, it tells you and deletes it. If you try to execute a program with a virus, it tells you. Heck, most times if you even OPEN A FOLDER WITH A VIRUS IN IT SOMEWHERE it will tell you.

      Heck, the only way it wouldn't see a virus is if you didn't update your defs.

    15. Re:RPC Patch by killthiskid · · Score: 1

      Uhh... worms do not infect via e-mail... a mail scanner will do you no good.

    16. Re:RPC Patch by aldousd666 · · Score: 1

      Yes they do, infact most worms infect via email. Only two that I know of don't, and they both exploited the same hole in dcom. I know there are lots of other non-email worms out there, but.. if you read the rest of my post, I said email scanner AND keep up with the patches. Please read all of what I wrote before proceeding to make yourself look stupid.

      --
      Speak for yourself.
    17. Re:RPC Patch by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      The situation you describe is achievable, but not for any sane amount of money.

    18. Re:RPC Patch by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      Yes, but Macs _encourage_ you to know the whole system. That's the difference, with Macs you can know your tool. With Windows, you can't. Mac users are usually very intelligent and very resourceful with their Macs. They usually have it customized and tweaked straight to the way they like to work. With Windows, it's very much "don't touch that" "you don't need to know what that does" "it really works a little different underneath the hood" and "why don't you just let your system administrator take care of that". With Mac, users are encouraged to even mess with the system folder, moving extensions around and the like.

    19. Re:RPC Patch by plover · · Score: 1
      Our company has one better. They delete ALL executable email attachments. They virus scan them anyway and replace the attachment with a text note that says "No executable attachments via email." (If it was infested, the scanner replaces the note with something like: THE ATTACHMENT SOBIG.PIF CONTAINED A VIRUS AND WAS DELETED.)

      At first I thought it was a stupid policy, but now I like it. I don't get crap email greeting cards from well-meaning idiots, or viruses, or any other junk. Much more pleasant. Plus, the idiots in the cubes next to me don't open their viruses either.

      --
      John
    20. Re:RPC Patch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously haven't used OS X. Lots and lots of "under the hood" stuff, including a full UNIX layer. It's at least as complicated as Windows, if not moreso.

    21. Re:RPC Patch by burbilog · · Score: 1

      Sometimes antivirus scanners can't help. We can't install antivirus software on user computers (most of them) because people use old dos application that crawls under any realtime protection. So the only defense is unix antivirus software filtering mail (users are separated from internet, only mail and squid work), and sometimes viruses leak in anyway -- stupid users bring their own diskettes, sometime they use their laptops which got infected earlier while they were connected to their home ISP, sometimes virus gets there before update arrives, some months ago it got there at 15:20, but antivirus db was released around 15:14, db was fetched at 15:10 (every ten minutes) and I can't poll 'em every minute! Six minutes is a very small gap, but it was enough. But it was rare situation, usually someone brings their home laptop or something. Once they brought virus burned on CD with some presentations and it was handed to out big wigs...

    22. Re:RPC Patch by aldousd666 · · Score: 1
      Antivirus scanners right, they aren't always effective, but if you look at what killthiskid wrote, that method seems to be the most effective. No executable email attachments, that means .scr, .vbs (.vbe), .bat, .pif, .com, .exe etc. None of them. If people want to send you email attachments, txt and .doc are ok. We even have the scanner strip out '' tags from the html emails, and expands the links to visible URL's on the way in.

      Sometimes they look funny after that, but that how you know it's working;)

      --
      Speak for yourself.
    23. Re:RPC Patch by killthiskid · · Score: 1

      Ah, sorry, not really feeling stupid here.

    24. Re:RPC Patch by Glenn+R-P · · Score: 1

      Our company has one better. They delete ALL executable email attachments

      My ISP has one better than that. Since Tuesday morning they have
      been returning ALL of my incoming email along with a message claiming
      I'm a spammer. Evidently they don't understand that viruses forge
      the From address.

    25. Re:RPC Patch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A:
      I'm a programmer, not a sysadmin. Maybe they should be.

      B:
      I'm sure it is fairly difficult to track 30 or 40 laptops some of whom are gone for weeks at a time, much less scan and patch them before they reenter the system. And let's not forget VPN. They do a good job. For a perfect job, I think eliminating Windows would be necessary.

      Your answers are simplistic. If there was a perfect solution, it would already be slowly spreading amongs the managers of corps as policy.

  68. SoBig ... So Annoying by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I dump any emails over 100K from one account right to /dev/null, which is enough to be dumping almost all viruses. Checking the logs, I've a hundred or so already.

    More annoying than the worm are all the "You are infected" warnings coming from clueless virus software. They make it through the spam filters.

  69. Virus Notifications by Micor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I turned off Sender Notifications for virus stripping ages ago because these things spoof that reply-to. Now I am starting to block domains whose notification messages are clobbering my server. These notification messages are coming in by the thousands and only further confuse the issue. They also annoy my users who aren't at fault in the first place.

  70. This is the E-mail I got from my school: by ewithrow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To: All Georgia Tech Students

    The Office of Information Technology (OIT) has detected the following worms and viruses proliferating on the Georgia Tech campus network:
    -MS Blaster worm
    -DCOM (Nachi) worm
    -W32/Sobig-F virus

    Successful worm and virus outbreaks impair networks by blocking access or increasing the time it takes to transfer data across a network connection. It is imperative that everyone on campus take appropriate actions to secure their systems from current and future outbreaks.

    Overall Risk to Georgia Tech
    Infected systems must be cleaned to contain the worm or virus and prevent further proliferation. The time it takes to clean infected systems causes lost productivity throughout the campus community. If an outbreak is not contained, some network services will become unavailable due to "denial of service" events.

    Any desktop and server computers with Windows (2000, NT 4.0, XP, and Server 2003) that connect to the Georgia Tech campus network and have not been patched are vulnerable to the MS Blaster and DCOM/Nachi worms. The Sobig-F virus can infect any Windows system (95, 98, NT 4.0, Me, 2000, and XP) via email attachment or Windows file sharing. These worms and the virus do not infect Macintosh computers.

    Actions Taken by OIT
    OIT has taken these steps to contain the current outbreaks:
    -Blocked the ports vulnerable to these worms at the campus network border.
    -Notified the technical support community on what to do regarding these worms.
    -Temporarily blocked the ports vulnerable to these worms at the ResNet and EastNet routers to prevent un-patched systems of arriving students from damaging the rest of the campus. The effect of this will be that certain services such as file sharing will not be possible from within Resnet/EastNet to the rest of campus. These changes will not prevent access to mail, internet or other campus services.

    We are currently working very closely with the ResNet manager to repair ResNet's infected student machines. You can help us by following these actions immediately:

    Actions for Students to Take

    If your system is currently infected, you must make sure it gets disinfected.

    Get assistance from one of the technical support staff members, obtain the fix CD from your RTA, or download the appropriate software tools from the web.

    To remove the Blaster worm, obtain the Stinger tool:
    http://vil.nai.com/vil/averttools.asp#sting er

    Immediately update your computer's security software.

    All computers that use the Georgia Tech network should have up-to-date anti-virus and personal firewall software installed. To protect your system from future worms and viruses:
    -Download and configure anti-virus (VirusScan) and personal firewall (ZoneAlarm) software from the OIT software distribution web page (http://www.oit.gatech.edu/software/ ).
    -Do not open any email attachments from senders you do not recognize.
    -Since some viruses and worms send infected messages that appear to come from email addresses that may be known to you, care should be taken before opening attachments that you are not expecting. More information and guidelines can be found at http://www.security.gatech.edu/ .

    If you are running Windows and have not installed the current patches, please go to the Microsoft website and download the Blaster worm security patch.

    WinXP:
    http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/detai ls.aspx?Fa milyID=2354406c-c5b6-44ac-9532-3de40f69c074&displa ylang=en

    Win2000:
    http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/det ails.aspx?Fa milyID=c8b8a846-f541-4c15-8c9f-220354449117&displa ylang=en

    Win2003:
    http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/det ails.aspx?Fa milyID=f8e0ff3a-9f4c-4061-9009-3a212458e92e&displa ylang=en

    If you need assistance from the ResNet technical staff:
    ResNet site (http://www.res

  71. The directors cut! by clckwrkMalChick · · Score: 1

    The title of this article sounds like it should be the name of a pr0n flick.

    --

    -=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-
    What would Yossarian do?
  72. ...aissuR teivoS edistuO by jetkust · · Score: 0

    !!!UOY ot liame dnes sesuriV

  73. SoBIG infection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This is the first time our W2K servers got smashed. Seems our employees weren't smart enough (or trained enough) to know NOT to click on strange unexpected emails. Now we're contemplating blocking ALL internet access to our thin clients to prevent this. Our Linux box and filtering hasn't let a single whippersnapper in yaaay!
    Shame on Symantec for not releasing a critical definition that all clients would auto download the night of discovery.

  74. Your stupidity, My over reaction! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Virii is not a word

    Viruses on the other hand is

    1. Re:Your stupidity, My over reaction! by Remik · · Score: 1

      Yes, it was a joke.

      And, while you correct my spelling you should strive to use correct punctuation.

      -R

  75. Re:Fuck SoBig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He may be huge, but his website is fucked up.

  76. THIS SUCKS by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    I havent got ONE sobig wormmail. Not one.

    Boo hoo. Someone send me one, please, I feel left out.

    And was it just me, or did that article just wander all over the place? I mean one paragraph its talking about SoBig email worm, in the next Blaster and in the next the overall cost of spam, three completely unrelated items, but put together gave the impression that this email worm was stopping trains from running and costing billions?

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  77. Speaking of getting a clue by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    DCOM was patched over a month ago.

    This worm is another attachment thing. Not Microsoft's fault. More clueless users.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
    1. Re:Speaking of getting a clue by negacao · · Score: 1

      Not Microsoft's fault.

      hahahahahahahahahahahaha.

      good one.

    2. Re:Speaking of getting a clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why port 135 is opened by default?

    3. Re:Speaking of getting a clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're saying that it's clueless users fault, because they haven't picked up a completely unnatural habit.

      Opening attachments is the obvious, most useful thing to do. If people send you an attachment, you should be able to open it without cause for concern, because that's what attachments are for. People use attachments everyday in the course of their work, without doing anything wrong.

      But because of deficiencies most email programs - the way they treat attachments - users get blamed instead of the software. This is completely backwards. When it can be done (and it can be here) , software should conform to users' habits, rather than the other way around. That's just common sense.

    4. Re:Speaking of getting a clue by tesmako · · Score: 1

      Because the point of Remote Procedure Calls is that they are remote, that is, from a different location.

      Sure one doesn't need RPC all *that* often, but people suggest random firewalling for everything, one has to consider functionality a bit too.

    5. Re:Speaking of getting a clue by SoSueMe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Recently experienced a corporate "upgrade" to Exchange.
      By default, every folder had "Preview Pane" enabled (1st bad sign).
      All new folders have "Preview Pane" enabled by default (2nd bad sign).
      No global control for "Preview Pane" to be disabled (3rd bad sign).
      Coworker has 60 virus-laden e-mails this morning.
      Friday shutdown because of Blaster.

      The switch is going to save us how much????

  78. Vacations? by ReeferCpe · · Score: 1

    Am I missing something? What is so important about this week that "so many people are on vacation?"

  79. PIF by kenp2002 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Honestly why would a user run a PIF attachment anyways? Would you use unknown medication? Why would you run unknown attachments? Simple solution: Server.CreateFilter(attachments, PIF)

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    1. Re:PIF by biggj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I haven't used Outlook in a while, so correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't Outlook auto open attachments when the user is using the preview pane?

      --
      -- [Sig] Rome did not create a great empire by negotiation; They did it by killing everyone who opposed them.
    2. Re:PIF by doppleganger871 · · Score: 1

      From my distant history memory, Yea, I think so. People wouldn't know what to do with an attachment if they didn't have it spooge all over them automatically. I'm glad I hang out with the smart crowd.

    3. Re:PIF by herrvinny · · Score: 1

      I'm using Outlook Express, with the Preview Pane activated, and I got two SoBig viruses a few hours ago. Express didn't attempt to autolaunch the attachments for me. (Of course, if it had tried, my Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition would have held it at bay.) Anyway, I didn't even know what a .PIF file was until I looked it up.

    4. Re:PIF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, in fact Outlook blackholes executable attachments by default. So this worm is most likely being spread by Netscape, Eudora, etc users.

    5. Re:PIF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Riight. The users of those programs are highlighting the attachment, right-clicking, picking "save as" and saving it to their drive. Then they are clicking on "my computer" to bring up their file manager, going to that directory, and double-clicking the file to execute it.

    6. Re:PIF by Aidtopia · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In an effort to be "friendly," newer versions of MS Windows default to hiding those oh-so-confusing file extensions from helpless uses, so they'll typically see "foo" rather than "foo.pif". Even nastier are those infection files named things like "photo.jpg.pif". Windows dutifully hides the .pif extension, and the user sees "photo.jpg". Doesn't look so dangerous that way.

    7. Re:PIF by fizbin · · Score: 1

      Only if you've installed the dreaded "outlook security patch".

      Which, by the way, also makes it impossible to read attached email messages, meaning that most things forwarded to you by someone else are completely useless. (Sorry, we deleted the attached email, even though it just contained plain text, for security concerns. Have a nice day)

      This and other problems has led most places to avoid this particular security patch. (There's also the fact that uninstalling it is next to impossible)

    8. Re:PIF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      better solution:

      fork();
      setuid(random_uid());
      link_attachment_ to('/var/empty')
      chroot('/var/empty');
      turn_off_ network();
      exec(attachment_path);

      Seriously, why does the OS/mail program *allow* attachments to do anything dangerous? Some tight sandbox could be created that just displays whatever the attachment will display and that's it!

    9. Re:PIF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "dreaded security patch" is included by default in new versions of Outlook and OE, although it's slightly less braindead than the original.

    10. Re:PIF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry dude -- I sent myself a PIF and a SCR, and here's the scorecard:

      Outlook XP -- Blocked
      Outlook Express 6 -- Blocked
      Mozilla 1.4 -- Marked as junk, but launching the attachments is just a doubleclick, and selecting "Open".

    11. Re:PIF by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

      No, you have to click on the paperclip icon and select the attachment to launch. The file attachment is obvious.

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    12. Re:PIF by biggj · · Score: 1

      That sounds more like outlook express then outlook.

      --
      -- [Sig] Rome did not create a great empire by negotiation; They did it by killing everyone who opposed them.
  80. I'm jealous by CDR1313 · · Score: 1

    I haven't got a single SoBig e-mail yet. I guess our FreeBSD mail server is smacking all those messages down, which means I have to... get... to... work...

    Sigh

    --
    Are the voices in my head bothering you?
  81. I've got worse for their ass by segment · · Score: 1
  82. mimedefang+spamassassin is cool (was Re:huh) by jaredmauch · · Score: 1
    Well, you're just not well loved. here's what I've seen on my puny little mail server:

    puck:~> grep MDLOG /var/log/maillog | grep bad_filename | wc -l
    1408
    puck:~> grep MDLOG /var/log/maillog.Wed | grep bad_filename | wc -l
    1606
    puck:~> grep MDLOG /var/log/maillog.Tue | grep bad_filename | wc -l
    1561
    puck:~> grep MDLOG /var/log/maillog.Mon | grep bad_filename | wc -l
    0

    1. Re:mimedefang+spamassassin is cool (was Re:huh) by Tenareth · · Score: 1

      [root@smtp log]# grep -c blocked_filename spamlog*

      spamlog:1068
      spamlog.1:1408
      spamlog.2:1159
      sp amlog.3:27
      spamlog.4:17

      (I moved mimedefang's logging to local1)

      1.2GB of blocked files. and I counted just looking for .pifs, it was almost exactly the same outcome. It's all SoBig... (pun intended).

      --
      This sig is the express property of someone.
  83. Slashdot, bearer of bad news by Denor · · Score: 1

    Slashdot's usually one of the first places I stop by in a day, but I generally check my e-mail first. Today my account was (again) over-quota due to good old SoBig's messages. I used to only check once a day but if I want to actually get any messages I've had to do it a bit more often. So today as I was going through the cleanup, I thought to myself "Oh well, at least it'll be over soon."

    Then I went to Slashdot. Front page, first story there - "The Worst is Yet to Come".

    Thanks Slashdot. You really know how to lighten up someone's day.

    --
    -Denor
  84. An effed-up world! by cOdEgUru · · Score: 1

    On one end you have Microsoft, building and selling software like crazy.

    Right underneath them, you have developers who dont give a shit about what they build and let in bugs like crazy..

    Right next to them, you have the marketing goons spread FUD like crazy

    On another end, you have companies/people buying Microsoft software like crazy..even after they read day in and day out of worms/bugs/critical flaws and what not..

    On this end, you have Sys Admins who do give a fuck and try patching their systems like crazy and still goes under the barrage of worms/viruses

    On the other end, you have script kiddies/idiots and people who seriously need to fucking stop and have a life, spewing out nastier and nastier worms/viruses every week

    On another end, you have people like us who wish someone somewhere would sue the fuck out of software firms like MS to be held accountable for the tripe they churn out every year

    And in another corner, I stand with a big fuckin baseball bat ready..waiting for the next script kiddie and the next spammer coming to ravage my tiny XP boxen tidily hidden behind me..

    When would this shit stop?

  85. SPIKE not PEAK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Worst is Yet to Come"..."Inboxes will unleash the worms worst attacks"

    Oh yeah? So neither bl8n8r nor taco actually *read* the article?

    yeah i know, it's just /., but dangit guys..

  86. How did you get SoBig? by og_sh0x · · Score: 5, Funny

    I had a user that called me because he actually got a copy of SoBig in his inbox. Usually our mail scanners are really good at filtering out even the newest viruses. What I didn't realize is that our AutoUpdate had failed that day, so it didn't have the SoBig update. So I asked him, "Well how the heck did you get SoBig?" and he answered, "From eating so many sandwiches."

    1. Re: How did you get SoBig? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      You should be getting about a dozen e-mails a day telling you how to get SoBig. Don't you read your mail?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  87. Who names these things? by yoho_jones · · Score: 1

    Do the virus writers name the virii or is it Antivirus companies?

    In any event... Whoever named this doosey has a real... Inferiority Complex. If you get my meaning...

    You might say he... Is trying to make up for something... If you get my meaning.

    You might even go as far as to say... He has a small penis and named the virus sobig because he is ashamed of it....

    Wait...

    Maybe I went to far...

    Yoho

  88. hardware nat/firewall? by whorfin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would it be a good idea to have consumer pc boxes equipped with cheap builtin hardware firewall/nat?

    It could, of course, be turned off by corporate IT folk who don't want to have it, or by the intrepid home user who knows what they are doing, but for the unwashed masses, would just 'be there'.

    Anyway, would this provide any actual protection? And could it pass the UI test for the standard user?

    --
    Laugh while you can, monkey-boy!
    1. Re:hardware nat/firewall? by saturndude · · Score: 1

      A year or so ago, I read some light speculation that router capabilities would be built into the cable modem box or the ADSL (high speed over phone line) box.

      Personally, I'm using a nice Netgear router on my home box. My ISP is using "Brightmail" from Cloudmark to stop e-mail virii like SoBig. I couldn't be happier.

  89. why, why, why BOUNCE the infected emails? by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    Why are so many mailservers detecting the virus and then bouncing the?

    I am receiving almost as many bounce reply emails as I receive actual viruses (of course our open source virus scanner already stripped the executables, so no problem, except to delete them)

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:why, why, why BOUNCE the infected emails? by Cronq · · Score: 1

      Open source virus scanner strips attachments and then I get bunch of almost empty messages that would be stopped by mine antivirus (or rather simple exiscan rules) if they were _with_ attachments :-(

  90. Re: Wintel Users Never Learn by Black-Man · · Score: 1

    I just got out of a meeting about this virus and how it's affecting corporate messaging/email. Everyone started whining about their home PC's and of course I had to interject about my virus-free Mac OSX Power Mac at home.

    They just looked at me with their open mouths and vacant stare. Meeting adjorned.

  91. Panic, everyone! by BRSloth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The thing I like the most in those "worm reports" it's they say everytime that the worm spread throught mail, but never cite that there is only one email client that allow that kind of stuff and that there are alternatives.

    Why can't someone come with something inteligent and say "the worm uses Microsoft's Outlook to spread itself"?

    1. Re:Panic, everyone! by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      "the worm uses Microsoft's Outlook to spread itself"

      In this particular case Sobig.F has it's own SMTP engine.

      Users that do not have Outlook at all, could still easily cause as much damage. Mozilla users that open the attached file could then infect their machines and server shares to get other computers on the network.

      Which then start broadcasting the infected mail again.

      Obviously, most average Joes DO use Outlook, but it is not necessary and there is no exploit the thing is using... it's just dumb people who have replaced their "computer security" slot with "patch windows" where it used to contain "don't click on stupid shit"

  92. 671 out of 693 from one IP... by rthille · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've got 693 SoBig spams to my obfuscated address: 'web-slashdot@NOSPAM.rangat.org' (I've since updated my DNS to serve an MX for nospam.rangat.org to 127.0.0.1, but it hasn't propagated yet. ) Almost all were from one IP: "Received: from cs24174102-171.houston.rr.com (HELO MARK-TRQBH52QXQ) (24.174.102.171) by bluesky.thille.org with SMTP; 21 Aug 2003 19:59:41 -0000"
    Not sure if he's a spammer that got infected, but the 'from' addresses are coming from a huge number of unique and seemingly 'real' addresses.
    I finally just setup my mail server to drop connections from that IP.

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    1. Re:671 out of 693 from one IP... by doppleganger871 · · Score: 1

      I've been finding the same thing in my yahoo mail inbox... I've also been getting a lot of messages from mail servers telling me that I've sent them viruses. So, I know my addy is being used as a sender addy. My guess is some online merchant got hit that has my yahoo addy and that's where a LOT of the mail came from.

    2. Re:671 out of 693 from one IP... by greymond · · Score: 1

      From my understanding of it (at least according to how our IT dept. explained it to us) is that the virus uses the "reply address" of everyone in the infected users address book. So in this case if it was an online merchant or even a coworker or friend who was infected and had you in there address book you would possibly start getting peole replying to you or failed sent email responces from random servers.

    3. Re:671 out of 693 from one IP... by ozbird · · Score: 1

      I noticed the same thing - over half of the copies of SoBig.F I received, and the only bounce message alleging to be from me, came from an IP address somewhere in California. As I don't know anyone in CA and didn't recognise the domain at all, I wonder how they got my email address? Either it was somehow collected by the user, or this machine was deliberately set up as a distribution point (either by the owner or the OwN3r...)

  93. A great new slogan by McAddress · · Score: 4, Funny

    Linux during a virus epidemic, it's like being out of the country during the blackout.

    1. Re:A great new slogan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funnily enough, I was out of the country during the blackout. The Marriott in Puerto Vallarta shielded me in marble-clad goodness and a really, really big pool didn't hurt.

      Now, I feel the same way back at home with my Linux, NeXT, Suna nd Mac OS X boxen all being impervious to this .pif silliness.

      Woo hoo! it's good to be the gringo.

  94. Undeliverable: Your details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your message

    To: [email deleted]
    Subject: Your details
    Sent: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 08:10:59 -0700

    did not reach the following recipient(s):

    [email deleted] on Thu, 21 Aug 2003 12:10:13 -0700
    The recipient name is not recognized
    The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=us;a= ;p=avnet;l=AMER100308211910QX6K85V7
    MSEXCH:IMS:Avnet:AMER:AMER10 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient
    Message-ID:
    From: cmdrtaco@slashdot.org
    To: [email deleted]
    Subject: Your details
    Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 08:10:59 -0700
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)
    X-MS-Embedded-Report:
    X-Security: MIME headers sanitized on mail.slashdot.org See http://www.impsec.org/email-tools/sanitizer-intro. html for details. $Revision: 1.134 $Date: 2002-04-21 16:30:40-07
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
    X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98d
    X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain

    See the attached file for details
    Network Associates WebShield SMTP V4.5 MR1a on amer06 detected virus W32/Sobig.f@MM
    in attachment details.pif from and it was Deleted and Quarantined.

  95. It's RIAA/MPAA math by swb · · Score: 1

    Just like each copied CD is worth $100 in revenue to the record industry, each infected computer costs $1000 to fix (which, oddly, is more than it would cost to throw out the entire machine!).

    And Linux is $700 a throw too.

    1. Re:It's RIAA/MPAA math by nordicfrost · · Score: 1
      I don't know about you, but this virus thingy has so far earned me a little over 10 000 emails in my account. But who's counting?!


      As for this line:

      technical support personnel and lost productivity by the computers' users can range from $500 to $1,000 per infected machine

      This is something I can relate to:

      Hours spent on fixing machine (setting up rules and updating antivirus software): 1/2 @ 60 USD

      Hours spent on home office trying to shuffle through and delete non-relevant email on a Novell Groupwise webmail connection: 2 @ 60 USD

      150 USD is what my employer spent on my lost work time, and we did not record a single incident in our systems! That is what you pay for having a publicly widespread email address.

  96. Some companies deserve it by EZmagz · · Score: 5, Interesting
    My company being one of them. The place I currently work (fuck it, I hate working there anyway...it's 3M, the Scotch Tape(tm) people) is a disaster zone right now. The entire IT staff is contract-only. There is no centralized IT plan for keeping systems up-to-date, beyond updating the software when the PCs come in for repair or an upgrade. That gives some users a 5 year timespan when no service packs are installed.

    This week alone our entire department has been thrown around, manually patching EVERY box on the network. That's around 50,000 computers. Today alone I ran across probably 10 Windows NT boxes that were still running THE FIRST SERVICE PACK!

    My point is, I do NOT feel sorry in the least when companies like 3M lose millions of dollars because they don't hire a competent IT department. Hell, out of the 20 guys I work with, only myself and two others graduated from a 4 year college. Whatever. For the last four days when full-timers have been bitching at me while I upgrade their PC because their order-tracking software won't work, I just smile and tell them "you get what you pay for. Tell your bosses to hire a competent IT department and you'll never have this problem again." Then I walk away and sigh because I know it'll never happen. Guess paying a contracting firm $40/hr so they can turn around and pay me $13/hr while they get to save themselves from paying benefits is worth the millions of dollars in downtime.

    --

    "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned for SEGA. ..."

    1. Re:Some companies deserve it by isoga · · Score: 2, Interesting
      1. Put together a professional business case for a dedicated IT team.

      Show some rough calculations for costs of dedicated staff, hardware, software(systems management, etc). Balance that against the savings from reduced downtime, increased productivity, better reputation from business partners and other goodwill. You will find that the numbers for having systems down and people unable to work become big very quickly.

      3.Show how long it takes to see a positive return on investment, and how much they'll be ahead in 2 and 5 years. Offer to set this up and run it.

      4.Enjoy your position as CIO of a fortune 500

      5.Profit!!!!

    2. Re:Some companies deserve it by isoga · · Score: 0
      Important note for step 1. Send / present it to someone waaaay high up. They have to be above the self-interest of the current team. And someone who is not going to feel embarrased about the status quo.

      Also, throw in some Open Source in the mix where it will help further reduce costs

    3. Re:Some companies deserve it by 5.11Climber · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you feel that strongly about it then either do something about the situation or simply quit and go someplace else. You don't contribute anything by making snide comments to people who may not know better. You could help the situation by providing a clear and concise report on the situation with some concrete recommendations on how to correct the problem. They may even put you in charge of the effort.

      I too am a contractor to a large company and I feel no compuction about telling the people to whom I report when I see a problem. This normally results in my having to head up the effort that I have identified.

      --
      Arf!
    4. Re:Some companies deserve it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its pretty funny when you come to fix a problem as a representative of the IT department and then basically tell the user that YOU are incompetent. Because that is how they will take your comments.

      Because 3M had a plant go down, it is likely that this situation will be fixed in pretty short order. Where I work (larger company than 3M) this would mean changing contractors to someone who can do the job.

    5. Re:Some companies deserve it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, that's the proper reaction. The users are pissed at the IT Department, when in fact there is none. Only a bunch of sub-sub-sub-contractors who haven't found where the restroom is yet. The only way that gets fixed is pressure from outside.

    6. Re:Some companies deserve it by Saeger · · Score: 1
      (fuck it, I hate working there anyway...it's 3M, the Scotch Tape(tm) people)

      "How unprofessional! You'll never work in this town again!"

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    7. Re:Some companies deserve it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, only 3 out of 20 of the guys you work with have 4 year degrees. Well... SO WHAT? I work with plenty of people with BS, MS, and even PhD degrees, and some are still useless. Yet our best security sysadmin does not have his degree (dropped out of a CpE program with a semester left). I HATE it when companies, and people, assume that a four year degree is worth anything. I know some schools that churn out degrees that aren't even good enough to pass for my high school diploma. And in my field, a computer consulting firm, we have people with teaching degrees, history degrees, biology degrees... only a few people here actually have CS/EE/CpE degrees, so I fail to see how your point is valid. I'd rather have someone who understands computers than any schmuck with a four year degree.

      Also, what kind of crap-turd degree do you have if it's only getting you $13/hour with no benefits? My sister has a BA in social services and makes $32k a year with benefits. A friend of mine has a BA in Psych and makes $29k with benefits. Oh, wait. Lemme guess. You've got a BA in "liberal studies" from a directional college (Southern College of NorthEastern Ohio, am I close?), and you've been working entry level IT since you graduated in 1995, since computers were "hot" and you could make a lot of money. You took your current job because you were a victim of the dot com bubble burst and now you can't get a real IT job. I understand now.

  97. No kidding by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    I got like 20 of those emails in the past couple days, most of them this morning. I've never really got that many copies of the viruses that have been floating around.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  98. Undeliverable: Re: Wicked screensaver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your message

    To: cmdrtaco@slashdot.org
    Subject: Re: Wicked screensaver
    Sent: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 08:51:59 -0500

    did not reach the following recipient(s):

    c=PE;a= ;p=GMD;o=Lima;dda:SMTP=cmdrtaco@slashdot.org; on Thu, 21 Aug 2003
    13:52:47 -0500
    The recipient name is not recognized
    The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=pe;a= ;p=gmd;l=GMDPRBDEX010308211852Q06WV7RQ
    MSEXCH:IMS:GMD:Lima:GMDPRBDEX01 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient
    From: cmdrtaco@slashdot.org
    To: cmdrtaco@slashdot.org
    Subject: Re: Wicked screensaver
    Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 08:51:59 -0500
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
    X-MS-Embedded-Report:
    X-Security: MIME headers sanitized on mail.slashdot.org See http://www.impsec.org/email-tools/sanitizer-intro. html for details. $Revision: 1.134 $Date: 2002-04-21 16:30:40-07
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
    X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98d
    X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain

    See the attached file for details

    [demime 0.98d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of alert_OA951_1061491967_GMDPRBDEX01_3#document_all. pif.txt]

  99. Wow by xactoguy · · Score: 2, Funny

    1 million dollars per employee? Where are you working at, 'cause I sure wanna get in on this cash cow ;)

    --


    And so we go, on with our lives
    We know the truth, but prefer lies
    Lies are simple, simple is bliss
  100. Hold M$ Accountable!!! by gsperling · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With the MSBlast worm running rampant right next to the recent re-release of the SoBig virus, it's hard not to be involved in the removal and sanitization of a computer system, especially for the majority of /. readers and participants.

    Face it, most of us are in a technical position of some sort, and are looked upon for assistance because of the knowledge we possess.

    My question is this: Who pays for our time? Is YOUR company expected to "eat" the costs of paying you for your time to sanitize their network from this malicious traversing code? Should it be the company's fault for utilizing software so prone to public vulnerabilities? Should the creators of the vulnerable software be held liable and accountable for their obvious flaws? Of course, tracking down the creators of the viruses is left up to the law enforcement officials and the persons charged with solving crimes. But, the viruses would not have existed if the vulnerabilities did not exist and were not exploited accordingly.

    I understand that the Glock company cannot be held accountable if some person used their weapon to terminate somebody's life. However, in the act of homicide, there is a definitive exchange of decisions. In the case of the virus, the infected party neither intended to receive the virus, nor wanted the problems associated.

    1. Re:Hold M$ Accountable!!! by KjetilK · · Score: 1
      Yeah, let's sue! Seriously!

      Even though I'm not vulnerable, this stuff has eaten a lot my bandwidth. There has to have been gross negligence on Microsoft's side at some point to allow this, and they should pay for the bandwidth I've lost.

      Whatever they say in their EULAs about warranties means nothing, because I've never agreed to it, they are behaving irresponsibly, and I want my money back...

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    2. Re:Hold M$ Accountable!!! by PenguiN42 · · Score: 1

      Do you think all these users, if they were magically switched over to linux, or macOS, would stop running executable attachments magically as well?

      These worms exploit no technical flaw. They're like social engineering worms.

      --
      The following sentence is true. The preceding sentence was false.
  101. Conspicuous absence by __aajqwr7439 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hmm... Nowhere does the article say the only Windows machines are infeccted by and propagate the worm.

    The SoBig worm is the latest in an outbreak that began 10 days ago with the so-called "Blaster" or "LovSan" worm which, by some estimates, infected more than 500,000 computers running the latest version of Microsoft Windows, the world's dominant operating system.

    That's the only place Windows is mentioned, with regards only to Blaster.

    xox,
    Dead Nancy

    1. Re:Conspicuous absence by gsperling · · Score: 1

      This is what the people in the media call
      SELECTIVE REPORTING

      Unfortunately much of the media relies on this type of reporting.

      Who do you get YOUR news from? ;)

  102. Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wal-Mart doesn't sell ham radios, you insensitive clod.

  103. Mac Users = Naive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    was being a little glib there, but it should be pointed out that the labor costs associated with managing all of this crap are pretty serious. Overtime charges, benefits and basic salary for an $74k employee for the last three days are running what? At least $1000k per employee. With eight IT dudes running around fixing all of the Wintel systems that's eight grand worth of new Macs that will have much better uptime and lower costs just from the last three days alone. Now, consider how many of these little virus and worm issues there have been in the past year.


    *sigh*. Nobody pays helpdesk people 74k in the US unless they have money to burn. If they do, let me know where I'll stop coding and start working helpdesk. All you need is a level 1 heldesk "dude" who makes about $10 an hour running around with a disk and the fix on it. Never mind if you applied the patch over a network. I have a mixed environment at work of Macs and PC's (and work on both) and the macs are no less crash prone than the PC's.

    The only advantage to a mac is you don't have to worry about viruses for it because it's market share is so small no virus writer would be bothered with writing one. It makes more sense to hire a network admin who is halfway decent, updates virus protection etc than to change over to mac. Not to mention the costs involved with retraining people to use a mac.

    If everyone followed your plan and switched over, do you really think that you wouldn't see more viruses and worms on the mac? I think mac users are a bit naive to assume they don't get worms/viruses because "mac is better". It's because virus writers for the most part don't know and don't care about mac.

    1. Re:Mac Users = Naive by jhoffoss · · Score: 1
      Heh, I and four others make up our helpdesk. They make 50k a piece plus [very good] bennies. I make $10/hr. Anywhere else, I would be at least level 2 support, if not 3. My four coworkers would be lucky to pass probation at level 1.

      <wicked witch of the west voice> What a world! oh what a world! < />

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
  104. amavis-new does just that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If a virus is from known spoofing virus then the autoreply to the sender is NOT sent. Now if everyone had a decent virus scanner at their server...

  105. scary part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The scariest part is that CSX is using windows to run the trains.

  106. what if the viruses do what you do? by herrvinny · · Score: 1

    What if the viruses do what you do? The viruses will just zip up their files and send them along, except now it will have more of an impact upon newbie users. All the (decently) smart newbie users have been told not to open .exe files, then suddenly, they'll see a .zip file and think "Doh, well that's not harmful" and they'll go open up the zip file and open up a can of worms.

    1. Re:what if the viruses do what you do? by SpaFF · · Score: 1

      Well on top of flat-out blocking .pif and .exe's, we also run all of our email through McAfee's virus scan for UNIX, which examines the contents of .zip files. I suppose if viruses started using zip files we could just have the mail server discard these messages instead of just cleaning the .zip file.

      --
      -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT d? s: a-- C++++ UL++++ P++ L+++ E- W++ N o-- K- w--- O- M+ V PS+ P
  107. haven't seen it yet by noah_fense · · Score: 1


    Absolutely no sign of ANY of the MS viruses in the past few weeks.

    AND, did I mention, I'm on the LARGEST (300,000+)windows network/domain in the world ?

    don't know how they did it.

  108. Its bizarre, but is it really sobig.f ? by M1000 · · Score: 1

    Reading the review of sobig.f, it doesn't match what i'm seeing right now in my inbox...

    Subject: I Love You ^_^ I sent you a beautiful Love Card

    application/x-msdownload attachment (BlueMountaineCard.pif)

  109. Hidden Costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The greatest costs of this virus are most likely not incurred by IT departments, but by the tens of millions of non-technical workers who have to take the time out of their work day to clean their inboxes out.

  110. Very much so- by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

    On the bottom of the /. screen is this quote from the day:

    "A few hours grace before the madness begins again. "

    How very very true...

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  111. I thought it was referring to Longhorn by brandido · · Score: 1

    With a reference to So Big, worst to come and windows, all in one article, I was sure that it was referring to the previous article about Longhorn :)

    --
    First Falcon-1 to orbit, then Falcon-9. Then I can die a happy man.
  112. Re:Salary! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
    Cost isn't a problem for my employer. Buying new software/downtime from changing to something better is!

    Sux don't it!

  113. Fighting Open Machines by SilentReproach · · Score: 1
    Actually, extending this, maybe the way to fight open machines is to cause the open machines to send themselves excessive traffic, rendering them fairly useless until their operators fix them, but not negatively impacting the rest of the net.


    No, they'll patch their server and leave the relay open. We're talking about morons here.
    --
    Religion is the opium of the people. Evolution is the opium of scientists.
  114. Not quite by mcc · · Score: 1

    2003 is the Year of the Sheep.

    Sheep, for all those people still running windows ;)

    *ducks*

    1. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheep have been known to be carriers of intestinal worms, maybe that's the connection.

  115. sad waste of time, effort and money. by twitter · · Score: 1
    It's move in week, and the 30 of us on staff are working 60+ hours this week. 8,000 or so computers are coming back, of those, we expect about 5,600 to be unpatched, and we expect that of those 5,600, that only 1,400 or so will be able to follow our documentation.

    So why don't you ban M$ computers? Surely, you have better things to do with your time and school money than support Microsoft's broken shit. With the kind of time and resources you have, you could have every one of those computers running Debian in a week. Yes, I imagine one peroson can sit over 3 or 4 hand installs an hour, just like I can. Practice makes perfect and you are sure to get better than that. Oh well, good luck.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:sad waste of time, effort and money. by Xerithane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So why don't you ban M$ computers? Surely, you have better things to do with your time and school money than support Microsoft's broken shit.

      Because they are students computers. When you start going to college, you'll understand this.

      With the kind of time and resources you have, you could have every one of those computers running Debian in a week. Yes, I imagine one peroson can sit over 3 or 4 hand installs an hour, just like I can. Practice makes perfect and you are sure to get better than that. Oh well, good luck.

      College. Students. They don't give a fuck about Linux. Why is it so hard for you to understand that some people like Windows?

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    2. Re:sad waste of time, effort and money. by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      "So why don't you ban M$ computers? Surely, you have better things to do with your time and school money than support Microsoft's broken shit."

      Because they are students computers. When you start going to college, you'll understand this.

      I did go to college (we call it university) and I understand this: I most certainly would not have had that crap on my computer. The only programs you actually use for school are a wordprocesser and a browser, neither of which require Microsoft software. If I can get software that isn't a virus magnet for free, to protect my valuable term papers, it's a no brainer.

      And don't tell me that somebody who made it to university can't figure out how to stick an Knoppix disk in the CD drive.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    3. Re:sad waste of time, effort and money. by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      I did go to college (we call it university) and I understand this: I most certainly would not have had that crap on my computer. The only programs you actually use for school are a wordprocesser and a browser, neither of which require Microsoft software. If I can get software that isn't a virus magnet for free, to protect my valuable term papers, it's a no brainer.

      That's you, and you are on Slashdot. College/Uni staff has no right to say what operating system to use as long as it satisfies the students needs. You can enforce patching.

      It's about choice. Everybody gets one. Not just the l33t l1nux users.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    4. Re:sad waste of time, effort and money. by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      I did go to college (we call it university) and I understand this

      I'm sure you did (and I did too), but I think the parent was referring to Twitter - who, when you read his past postings, comes more across as a 14 year old rabid Linux fanboy devoid of rational thought at many times.

      However asking every student to not use Windows is asking for trouble.

      There are a substantial proportion of the people out there in the world that can use Windows, don't want to use anything else, have invested the money in Windows (well, maybe a few) and see no reason to move off an operating system that is used by 90% of the population.

      Those that you do get to convert, will plague the helpdesk for years to come and probably resent you from forcing a change on them that they didn't want and don't see the need of.

      That is not what going to uni is all about.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    5. Re:sad waste of time, effort and money. by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      There are a substantial proportion of the people out there in the world that can use Windows, don't want to use anything else, have invested the money in Windows (well, maybe a few) and see no reason to move off an operating system that is used by 90% of the population.

      Those that you do get to convert, will plague the helpdesk for years to come and probably resent you from forcing a change on them that they didn't want and don't see the need of.

      That is not what going to uni is all about.

      True. Going to university is about learning to think for yourself. I see no evidence of that in someone who is willing to put themselves at risk and put up with constant cycles of virus infections for years, when a free and secure alternative is available, and an afternoon's effort is all it takes to do something about it.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    6. Re:sad waste of time, effort and money. by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      I see no evidence of that in someone who is willing to put themselves at risk and put up with constant cycles of virus infections for years, when a free and secure alternative is available, and an afternoon's effort is all it takes to do something about it.

      I've been using Windows ever since 95 and I can tell you now that is does not take "an afternoon's effort" to get to the same level of understanding about Linux than it does with Windows.

      Most people don't give a flying toss about their operating system as long as they are comfortable using it and are the most productive. They get that with windows because that what they have used for years. They get that with windows because everyone else around them has windows so they can get the software or support they need. They get that with windows because they know that whatever they buy will just work.

      To get a non-IT person (or sometimes even an IT person) to move away from something they are the most comfortable and most productive with is simply not going to happen unless you provide adequate backup (such as a dual boot).

      Even then, most people at university would far rather go out, drink, socialise, play sport, date and whatever else than wrestle with a new operating system.

      Using windows has nothing to do with being open minded, it depends on where your priorities are - and most people's priorities do not revolve around computers.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    7. Re:sad waste of time, effort and money. by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      I've been using Windows ever since 95 and I can tell you now that is does not take "an afternoon's effort" to get to the same level of understanding about Linux than it does with Windows.

      For the basic functionality word processing and browsing. I've seen firsthand proof of it. My mother sat down at my Linux+KDE machine and didn't have to be told a thing, except for which Icon was the browser and where on the menu to find OpenOffice. In the end, she didn't see any difference between Linux and Windows.

      But yesterday when I called her up and told her here computer was infected with a virus (sobig) and that Linux could not be affected by this virus, or any other virus as far as I know, then she saw the difference. She agreed right away to have her Windows OS replaced by Linux, to keep her files safe.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    8. Re:sad waste of time, effort and money. by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Most people don't give a flying toss about their operating system as long as they are comfortable using it and are the most productive. They get that with windows because that what they have used for years. They get that with windows because everyone else around them has windows so they can get the software or support they need. They get that with windows because they know that whatever they buy will just work.

      Sorry for sounding elitist, but Universities are in fact supposed to be schools for the elite. The "most people" you are talking about are definitely not elite material. If they can't handle the mundane differences between Windows and, say, KDE, then they really should not be in a four year degree program, they are just incapable of learning the subject material.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  116. actually, brain dead big dogs. by twitter · · Score: 1
    You would think that after Klez, the people who write these virus scanners and those who administer mail servers would realize that viruses sometimes spoof the "From:" field.

    Actually, you would think that after all the trouble people keep having with Micrsoft shit, that people would dump Microsoft. Wallstreet did and others are too. We can only hope that upper management everywhere gets the message: M$ is broke and it is not getting better.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:actually, brain dead big dogs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What trouble are you referring to? The fact that your company has a rock for an admin? It takes so little effort to secure against the latest worms it's pathetic.

      The problem is people sit back and wait for shit to happen. Job security I guess...

  117. Diversify by donnz · · Score: 1

    Here is a compelling agrumement for diversity of systems. The impact of these virus' would be much less by the simple fact of people using different operating systems. Never mind issues of which has better security just the fact that their are a variety of systems in use.

    I see the situation as rather similar to a population relying on one type of potatoe to feed the whole population. Get a bug in the tattie and the whole of Ireland starves...

    How about mandating that critical systems (such as Nuclear Power alarm systens) have back-ups on completely seperate platforms?

    --
    -- Free software on every PC on every desk
  118. Re:ban unpatched PCs by mabhatter654 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Too bad there isn't a system to test a PC for patched or not before allowing it network access? Then the network could protect itself by firewalling all access except to the patch! When new patches come out the firewall would force everyone to update the first time they plug in. It could be very cool, your own mini-windows update on each uni/corperate network.

    Of course, why would anyone do that. It would require cross-platform server abilities, no CALS, and MS to "push" the security updates rather than leaving users and admins wasting time hunting for them. It would reduce MS POWER & CONTROL what bill's buying with his $$$. MS won't release such a monster for FREE to clean up THEIR mess, and the OSS people could care less because it makes MS look even worse--why help them out!

  119. missed the interesting part or not?? by NeoNormal · · Score: 1

    Actually, I don't understand this statement. From what I know, the SoBig virus has its own SMTP code (multi-threaded) and sends the emails directly. How is it using bandwidth on any open relays if this is the case?

    The fact that the infected PC sends the emails is how we tracked down some of them in other parts of our overall network.

  120. Die by SamMichaels · · Score: 1

    radio:/usr/exim/exiscan/virusmails# ls -l | grep Aug | wc -l
    5853

    When can I get some sleep?

    1. Re:Die by Cheeze · · Score: 1

      /var/spool/qmailscan/quarantine/new# find | wc
      13240 13240 353204

      and that's just since 2am this morning.

      on a related side note, if you are running an Ascend TNT and are having lots of problems keeping it running, turning off ip route cache will fix the problem. For some reason, SoBig causes havoc with the Lucent OS.

      --
      Why read the article when I can just make up a snap judgement?
    2. Re:Die by Cheeze · · Score: 1

      oh yeah, i forgot to add this: /var/spool/qmailscan/quarantine/new# du
      1277140 .

      yep, 1.2gig of viruses.

      --
      Why read the article when I can just make up a snap judgement?
  121. Found em. by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    I've identified one of the computers that has been sending me the virus.

    I think they still owe me money for a programming job I did a couple years ago.

  122. F*cking Microsoft! by jo42 · · Score: 1

    After having gone around to all of our Windows machines, installing latest service packs, IE, hotfixes, Spybot S&D, etc., the rotten sodding buggers at Microsoft release an IE hotfix yesterday. Now I got to do it all over again! Bastards!!

    I propose we bill Microsoft for our time wasted screwing around with their crappy software. Would make us rich and them totally broke.

  123. Company Costs by smatt-man · · Score: 0

    The highest company costs for me is the time it takes explaining to people who are getting "undeliverable message - may be infected..." that no, they are not infected, the virus forges the email address. Then there are other companies that are too stupid to look at the header info of the messages and yell at me for infecting their systems when mine are all patched and virus free.

    --

    ---
    Lousy rotten karmic retribution.
  124. Re:Its bizarre, but is it really sobig.f ? by herrvinny · · Score: 1

    It's a virus, still. Notice how they misspelled Mountain (there's no ending "e" in the word mountain) The real company wouldn't have done that.

  125. SoBig Clean up by pandrel · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've already had to help a few people remove SoBig from thier systems and found that SARC has a removal tool that cleans up SoBig quickly and effortlessly by: 1. Terminating the W32.Sobig.F@mm viral processes. 2. Deleting the W32.Sobig.F@mm files. 3. Deleting the dropped files. 4. Deleting the registry values that the worm added. For those who need it it can be found at http://www.sarc.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.sobig.f @mm.removal.tool.html

  126. wow by dave1g · · Score: 1

    I put together a new computer last night and between the time I installed outlook, imported my old pst files, and did my first email check. I had apparently been infected with sobig and had gotten 5 replies form mail sevres saying they blocked some emails with the virus in it.

    I was like, whoa thats was fast

  127. Re:The Slashdot story missed the interesting part. by kyrre · · Score: 1

    Yeah, real insightful. The best way to fight spam would be to not use email. If spam mail won't get through, how many legitimate emails do you never get? Wasting lots of bandwidth is not the way to fight spam.

    Its the bandwidth usage that is the real problem with spam, any ok email client should catch most of the penis extending email anyway.

  128. Re:The Slashdot story missed the interesting part. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting...spoof a bunch of e-mails to the postmaster@ address on the open relay, that are also *from* the postmaster@ address, send enough to fill the mailbox, then they would get into an infinite bounce loop of trying to e-mail postmaster@, finding a full mailbox, bouncing back to postmaster@, finding a full mailbox...

  129. Anti-virus Programmers Crack IP Encryption by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to a swedish newspaper (I'm sure others run the story as well by now), anti-virus programmers have now finally cracked the 20 IP addresses SoBig will get its updates from this weekend. It's now a race against time to shut those IP addresses down. The IP addresses are located in USA and Canada.

    The reason it took this long to get the IP addresses were because they were heavily encrypted in the code and they couldn't to the usual "dump memory" trick when the virus was active since the IP addresses were only stored in memory just when they were needed, then the memory was freed.

    The anti-virus guys at F-Secure don't know what will happen if they don't shut down the 20 addresses in time, only that something might happen if they don't take down all addresses.

    Unusually clever actually, since I usually find viruses to be rather poorly coded and much like a hack job, like the Blaster virus that shouldn't have crashed the Windows computers much more efficiently go unnoticed. Anti-virus developers have also noticed this about SoBig and it is not very exhibitionistic either, like viruses usually are. These signs suggest that it's a more professional work than usual.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:Anti-virus Programmers Crack IP Encryption by Nexzus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmm. That's interesting.

      In essence, this virus is someone's copyright.

      If an American company had to decrypt the worm to get these addresses, they would probably be violating the DMCA.

      --
      Karma: Can only be portioned out by the Cosmos.
    2. Re:Anti-virus Programmers Crack IP Encryption by pclminion · · Score: 1
      The anti-virus guys at F-Secure don't know what will happen if they don't shut down the 20 addresses in time, only that something might happen if they don't take down all addresses.

      What a stupid idea. Suppose the guy put all of Google's IP addresses in there. I suppose they would shut down Google?

      Ever heard of a "decoy?" A "Joe job?"

    3. Re:Anti-virus Programmers Crack IP Encryption by scrod · · Score: 1
      ... anti-virus programmers have now finally cracked the 20 IP addresses SoBig will get its updates from this weekend. It's now a race against time to shut those IP addresses down. The IP addresses are located in USA and Canada.

      Sounds like a great plot for an action movie.
    4. Re:Anti-virus Programmers Crack IP Encryption by SheldonYoung · · Score: 3, Funny

      By chance did this "crack" of encrypted IP addresses happen to involve tcpdump and setting to clock ahead? Just asking.

    5. Re:Anti-virus Programmers Crack IP Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's looking to download something -- a second stage maybe. Unlikely it would be found on Google - these are sites under the author's control.

    6. Re:Anti-virus Programmers Crack IP Encryption by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Google is under everyone's control. Post something anywhere on the web and wait for Google to cache it.

      A truly genius virus author would post the payload on some site, allow it to "mature" for 6 months until it's archived over at the Wayback Machine, then release the virus. It spreads, but nobody can analyze the payload since it is delivered seperately. And nobody thinks to look on the Wayback Machine because hey, the virus just came out last week! How could the payload be sitting on some cache from a year ago?

    7. Re:Anti-virus Programmers Crack IP Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wayback Machine would work, but Google doesn't cache binaries.

      Still, it's really easy to get whatever content removed from archive.org. Worse would be some server in China or something with unresponding webmasters.

    8. Re:Anti-virus Programmers Crack IP Encryption by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Informative

      By chance did this "crack" of encrypted IP addresses happen to involve tcpdump and setting to clock ahead? Just asking. ;-)

      Actually, the virus don't care about local time to see when to self-update. It checks the time against NTP-servers and has done this since the SoBig.C incarnation.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    9. Re: Anti-virus Programmers Crack IP Encryption by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > Wayback Machine would work, but Google doesn't cache binaries.

      Put source code on Google and have the worm compile it.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    10. Re:Anti-virus Programmers Crack IP Encryption by KmK · · Score: 1

      Starting Score: 1 point Moderation +4 80% Informative 20% Interesting Extra 'Informative' Modifier 0 Karma-Bonus Modifier +1 Total Score: 5 wouldnt the total score be 6?

  130. Re:ban unpatched PCs by Hecubas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    On a somewhat related note, Microsoft gives out software for use on your own servers to act as a mirror of WindowsUpdate. You can configure the clients to automatically connect to that mirror and download updates from there. Look for Software Update Services on their website.

    --
    hecubas

    --
    Hecubas
  131. Also, school's starting. by pympdaddyc · · Score: 1

    In addition to what this article covers, in the next 3 weeks there will be massive influx of freshmen across the country, many who have new computers, never had their machine on the internet before, or were infected and never noticed.

  132. Malicious payload by hedley · · Score: 1

    I think the only way this mess will get the general publics attention is if one of these variants includes a partition scribbler or other malware. Clearly few apply patches to either the OS or the virus signatures. They use insecure mail apps and click on attachments.

    If you had a million PC's drop off the net one week with destroyed partition tables I would wager the general public might be curious as to why that happens and what they can do to prevent it.

    Hedley

  133. Re:Dull: -1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In SOVIET RUSSIA You infect the worm!

  134. Logic Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sir have exhibited good judgement and stated an logical point of view. This will not be tolerated. Please turn off your computer and kill yourself.

    Thanks, and have a nice day!

  135. Launched into the wild??? was Re:PIF by advocate_one · · Score: 1
    some t0sser called Misiko posted a "DSC-00465.jpeg" file into some binary newsgroups on Monday 18th... it was really a *.jpeg.pif, and would have automatically infected any user browsing those groups using outlook express and image preview set on.
    Unfortunately I've since deleted it (It's an offence to knowingly possess viruses in the UK)


    perhaps this is how the new one got launched into the wild???

    if anyone's interested, the message reference that it was in is [MPG.19ab40b72e8ed720989682@news.easynews.com] but google doesn't archive those groups. This might help those trying to trace the culprit though. If anyone needs more info, I've archived a copy of the warning I sent out in reply to it.

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  136. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  137. Symptons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I'm currently being hammered with ICMP echo requests, out of the last 400 packets dropped 339 of them were echo requests, suprisingly over 100 of them had the same sequence number 6193 and another 100 had the sequence number 5937, the majority of requests are from my local isp network.

    Is there any current virus that attempts to find hosts using echo requests before attempting infection?

  138. I don't know what people do to get these. by JFMulder · · Score: 1

    Frankly, I'm amazed at how many poeple recieve these. While I know a lot of computer illterate people, and recieve on the border of 10 to 15 pieces of spam each day on my ISP email adress, I never recieved a single email containing the "I love You", SoBig or any other virus from poeple I know or don'y. And I'm not a social recluse either, so my email is in a lot of adress book. Funny thing is, I have always been wondering why I never received these viruses by email. After all, I'm a pretty easy target. I run Outlook Express and when I started roaming the web 8 years ago, people didn't really mind giving their ISP email adress for anything from Amazon.com to Real Media to Microsoft back then, and I didn't mind either. Since then I've been burned by some of these companies and must have sold my email adress to some penis enlargment company or porn site.

    So just to be sure, I have Norton Antivirus fully updated, and it has flagged only one or two pieces of mail in the past month as having a virus in them and while I try to keep up with the recent virus outbreaks, the name didn't ring a bell, so it must have been pretty benign or rare.

    So, the question is, what did you people do to get these? I should be the one receiving them, and I never got a single one high-profile virus. As for the obvious answer how NOT to recieve these, well there is none, since even if you do run Linux, you'll still receive them, even tough they won't affect you at all.

    1. Re:I don't know what people do to get these. by cute-boy · · Score: 1

      I don't get many either, and I know my freinds get these things (and have me in their address book), as I'm forever listening to their bleating help requests. As you can tell from my attitude I've served my time on a support desk many years ago and have no desire to return there, even as a volunteer...

      Most of my mail comes via my free POP accress to my yahoo mail account (did they start to charge for that in USA? I remember a /. story on that a while ago...) I wonder if Yahoo filter suspect mail? If so it seems pretty efficient as I don't think I lose emails, and there's never anything in the spam folder when I bother to look on line.

      RG

  139. Proactive true "antivirus" servers by quibbit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I guess just an idea (that seems useful and maybe I'll think about more later) is why not actively hunt virii. There was this big collective effort with SETI a few years back, why couldn't there be some big servers hunting for the cracks on the backbone. Maybe just a group of people, or a coalition to produce a virus in the wild that goes after viruses. Maybe try to infect servers clandestinely with patches if it becomes known that a user is spouting out bad email. Why niot actively hunt spammers too? It seem like that was sort of the code of the hackers.. Or at least the myth back in the old days (94-96) when I was keeping track of things more (or at least listening to people rant on usenet about such things as kookery). What are the big time hackers (or is it crckes or some other new term nowadays) doing? Are they being anonymous, or testing the waters before something "big" is put out. Maybe I'm just blowing steam, but considering the power a virus can harness to replicate itself and search for new ports to infect.. It seems that the government/military or rogue hackers/(paramilitary) could make more of presence on the scene than seems viewable from the public eye. Are virii the only big claim to fame to people who know how to mess with big systems? Couldn't we have avanging angels against spam/virii instead? Well just my 4 cents.

  140. you are sofired. by twitter · · Score: 1
    With SoMany.IT.Workers unemployed, SoBig.And.ItsVariants have a strangely positive side effect... ...job security.

    At most places, it's time to pack your bags when things go this way.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  141. Apparently, it is the year of the Worm... by twoslice · · Score: 1
    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  142. I just don't understand this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We run a mixed shop... about half of our boxen are linux, and half are winblows. And yet still, we have never had a virus/worm problem unless it was a stupid user that brought a diskette from home that was infected.

    We use iptables firewalls. We watch traffic on the outside and in the DMZ with snort. We FORBID the use of Outlook, Outlook Express, and all other similar email clients on our internal machines. We lock down absolutely everything other than those services we have a business need to permit to enter our DMZ.

    Maybe we are just very lucky... but I don't think so. I think that company networks that go down with these problems (there have been 2 VERY LARGE corporations near by me with serious issues today), go down just simply because of stupidity. Those that get the virii deserve what they get. It is the law of consequences... if you sleep around, don't blame somebody else if you get an STD.

    Even if the world at large would only just take Outlook, and throw it out the window (pun intended), cyberspace would be so much better for it.

    Is it really that tough of a decision??????? Unprotected computer use can kill your box.

    ********
    Reality is Relative

  143. college computers booted from network for worm by mrgreenfur · · Score: 3, Interesting

    i'm a current student at Carnegie Mellon Univ. and about a week before everyone's slated to return, computing services sent out a letter saying that they were scanning the network for this worm and if found were removing machines from the network. If your machine has been removed, you gotta patch it and request it be re-allowed.

    it seems like a pretty good way to go about preventing it from spreading, and even non-techies at my school will jump on the patch once they read the part about getting kicked off the net (read: AIM/Kazaa/email)

    1. Re:college computers booted from network for worm by herrvinny · · Score: 1

      Same for University of Wisc @ Madison, except they sent along another message telling us that we're not supposed to use Kazaa because of various copyright reasons... I didn't read the rest.

    2. Re:college computers booted from network for worm by anothermortal · · Score: 1

      Johns Hopkins University (both the Univ and the SOM) do the same thing, except they have now resorted to not just killing internet access, but going down to the switches and shutting off the interfaces.(!) They did it to several mail servers that happened to be running non MS operating systems. (read: unix, and variants) Kinda sucky, but hey, what do you do when thousands of people don't give a fuck about patching their OS, or even running NAV (of F-Prot, or any anti-virus software) Such is life.

  144. Re:Its bizarre, but is it really sobig.f ? by Bassman59 · · Score: 1

    Also, a .pif is that goofy file Microsoft created so you could give DOS programs running under Windows 3.1 their own environment. Seems to me that pretty much any .pif file remaining these days is bad and oughta be deleted. Maybe MS will remove .pif support at some point in the future? I mean, who's still running 16-bit DOS apps? and why?

  145. think again. by twitter · · Score: 1
    This article claims that time wasted will cost businesses tens on millions of dollars. It seems to me that no matter how much spam/virus flooding/crap you get in your inbox, you only do so much work everyday. If you take five extra minutes to clean out your inbox, that's five minutes less of surfing slashdot or screwing around.

    Either you don't have a real job, or you are Astroturfing. The time wasted is rebuilding a computer that no longer works. You are right about deadlines though, they don't change. That means many people will be spending that much more overtime. This is bad for businesses that actually pay overtime, bad for people who don't get paid for it or have better things to do and bad for everyone with work to do.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:think again. by rrao · · Score: 1

      > Rather than blocking .scr/Pif/.exe and
      > deleting any email with such an attachment,
      > they are letting the group virus scanner on
      > our exchange servers deal with the entire
      > load.

      This'll be a good argument to use to create FUD against using/exchanging MS proprietary formats... Then the switch to OSX/Linux will be easier! Wow! did not think viruses/worms actually can do some good to the world :)

  146. Sobig not really M$'s fault by ihummel · · Score: 1

    Sobig is not really Microsoft's fault. I mean that if 90% of people used Linux and Mozilla instead of Windows and IE, Sobig would still be a problem. If someone is foolish enough to execute an attached file, that file could still replicate itself, read web caches and address books, and spoof addresses even under Linux. The key problem is that people are opening these attachments. That's just foolish.

    1. Re:Sobig not really M$'s fault by ratfynk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why the hell would I use wine to open e-mail under linux? Linux is not spreading this shit the MS UI is. Get your facts strait. The fault is entirely MS they are counting on this kaos so that they can step forward with the ultra secure win 2003 server and then the Longhorny security solutions. Your are spreading fluff and fud! Yes everyone is going to rush and secure their computers with Longhorny. But as Ben Franklin said "Those who sacrifice freedom for security will gain neither."

      --
      OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
    2. Re:Sobig not really M$'s fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "The key problem is that people are opening these attachments. That's just foolish."

      True. But think on this - SoBig is a *benign* virus. It does no real appreciable damage. (Don't give me cleanup cost speak, if you hired competent people, you wouldn't *need* to clean the corporate networks.)

      What will happen when a *real* virus is finally written for Windows? Back in the day (As in, decade+ ago), I remember what virii were like. Destroy the boot sector, frag the hard disk, randomly rearrange critical OS files..

      Under Linux, unless you've some dolt running as root, this isn't a threat. Joe User can only befuk the files in his home directory, and nothing else.

      Under Windows? Joe User just caused the whole box to shit itself.

      Microsoft would do well to remedy this problem before someone decides to write a 'real' virus.

    3. Re:Sobig not really M$'s fault by ihummel · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I was not clear. I did not say that the attachments could be opened under Linux and have the same effect, but that the worm could be written to run under Linux and do the same thing. The problem is in people executing executables sent via email, not the email software. I am not saying that Outlook/OExpress are secure, just saying that this problem is one that Linux could have as well.

    4. Re:Sobig not really M$'s fault by ihummel · · Score: 1

      Microsoft would do well to remedy this problem before someone decides to write a 'real' virus.

      They should, but they won't. They can deny responsibility for the damage a given virus causes and blame it on the author of the virus (who bear most of the blame, although M$ is also to blame for making an insecure product), while they can hardly disclaim responsibility for the hassle that your Average Joe would go through with permissions and users and all that (which is well worth going through, for the reasons you give above). Microsoft is making the choice that will cause it the least grief and all Windows users are paying for it.

    5. Re:Sobig not really M$'s fault by ratfynk · · Score: 1

      How can you get a virus to function in an email with an executable under linux, then make changes to the kernel so that it will do MS style do not ask the user first shit. Not possible, the virus would need the stupid user to switch to root, then do a gcc and then make, then install, recompile the kernel all by itself. No go charlie, it would be one hell of a big trojan and would quickly be identified by linux users world wide. (Which has already happened check symantec for Linux worms) You do not get E-mail viruses in linux you can get a trojan but the program sig is blocked out by the next check file list created for linux distros. Try learning linux the difference will make you appreciate how stupid the MS UI and OS really is.

      --
      OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
    6. Re:Sobig not really M$'s fault by LordSah · · Score: 1

      Given your use of:
      - Misspellings
      - Poor grammer
      - Insistence to use the term 'Longhorny'
      - Quote absolutely irrelevant to discussion but thrown in as a an attempt to add validity to your "argument"
      I believe that you are either not over the age of 8 or an insipid idiot.

      Your point, underneath the "fluff and fud!", is "M$ $ucks! Ev1L T00!" Very original.

      How this comment received karma baffles me.

    7. Re:Sobig not really M$'s fault by ratfynk · · Score: 1
      "insipid idiot" set value to true. I am the first to admit it. However I am very pissed that we are forced to use MS products. Then as a consequence suffer the stupidity of other MS users. The fault is with treating others as if they are stupid. A very common asshole /. trait as well as a microsoft software feature.

      talking to oneself is frequently the only way to carry on an intelligent conversation on /.

      --
      OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
    8. Re:Sobig not really M$'s fault by LordSah · · Score: 1

      The problem is users. I run Windows XP at home and at work. I've been running Windows (of various sorts) for 7 years, and never been infected with a virus, email or otherwise. It is possible to run a Microsoft operating system and be virus free.

      Now, I don't believe skillset required to run a secure Windows machine is any larger than that required to run a Linux machine. Any reasonably competant Linux user out there can probably use Windows with no security problems.

      The skillset to run Windows at all, however, is much smaller than Linux's. That is: you don't have to be nearly as competant to use Windows as Linux. There exists a whole bunch of folks who can just use Windows but are ignorant of patches, prudent internet practice, safe emailing, etc. I don't think those folks could run Linux without some determination.

    9. Re:Sobig not really M$'s fault by CharlesEGrant · · Score: 1
      Not possible, the virus would need the stupid user to switch to root
      Ever hear of an "escalation of privilege" attack?
      then do a gcc and then make, then install, recompile the kernel all by itself
      Ever hear of an installable kernel module?
    10. Re:Sobig not really M$'s fault by LordSah · · Score: 1

      Forced is a tough thing to argue. No one will buy anything they do not want.

      More accurately, you can be pissed that most of the world uses Microsoft products and most of them lack the technical skills required to make your life easier.

      Microsoft's MO is to enable folks who aren't computer savvy to use a computer. I find that admirable, and even desirable from a social evolution standpoint. Unfortunately, Microsoft has made some poor design choices, and some inevitable choices during the march forward. Some of it comes across as treating users as if they are stupid (clippy is the most blaring example I can think of).

      The good thing is, progress is being made (by Microsoft and others). WinXP is easier to use, far more powerful, more secure, and more stable than Win95. Same can be said of Office2003 (to be released shortly) vs Office of old.

      talking to oneself is frequently the only way to carry on an intelligent conversation on /.

      Too true :) I did come off harshly, and I apologize.

    11. Re:Sobig not really M$'s fault by ratfynk · · Score: 1

      Yes I run Win 98se and am as secure as you are also.
      Mind you I can use regedit, msconfig and lots of other tools to get rid of the shit on my system without even running symantec products. I even keep a clean install of windows and all the software on an old third harddrive and use XXCOPY the win32 long file name version of XCOPY to restore my C drive in a pinch. So yes I am a little more advanced than most windows users, however I would say that certain installs of Mandrake are just as easy to use as Windows. I use Slackware so I am a little bit beyond that level. WinXP has the problem of hash exposed passwords though so I do not like it, might just as well run 98 it is just as secure! Ms is talking security tuff guy but the reality is they have spent squat on their os security dev in the past few years, they are counting on processor certificates to bail their ass out.

      --
      OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
    12. Re:Sobig not really M$'s fault by ratfynk · · Score: 1

      My wife is forced to use MS software at work. I am forced to have an install of MS software at home as a consequence. My wife will not use OSS because it takes some skill to use the right file formats to do work and there are differences in the UI. This is not because she is a stupid MS user on the contrary. Proprietary file formats are a pain in the ass. If I could get her to use OSS I would dump the bloated insecure MS Office mail interface in a heart beat. Unfortunately I just have to dissable all the stupid MS default settings, like auto address book addition of people I reply to. Along with other security features like dump internet cash on exit I have managed to keep things clean. I have only had to win32 XXCOPY my clean software backup copy of my C drive once in the past 3 years. I refuse to pay a yearly ransom to Symantec anymore! I find that paying someone else a yearly ransom to secure your system and do maintenance is a real piss off! So as to if it is an MS problem, I think so until they completely change the nature of how their programs work I will not send them another cent of our hard earned cash!

      --
      OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
    13. Re:Sobig not really M$'s fault by CharlesEGrant · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I find that paying someone else a yearly ransom to secure your system and do maintenance is a real piss off!
      Even if you run Linux you still either have to invest the time to follow the security updates and gather the patches yourself, or pay somebody like Red Hat to do it for you. Depending on how much software you have installed, this can be a real time sink. I make ~$30/hr, so I'm happy to pay Red Hat the $15 a year to keep current on patches and fixes. And of course I still have to spend a couple hours a month keeping up with security issues in order to make sure Red Hat isn't screwing up.

      The price of security is eternal vigilance, and it's a pain in the neck.
  147. 300? Nobody loves you. by RatBastard · · Score: 1

    300 is nothing. I've recieved over 3,500! And it's not slowing down at all! It's a damned good thing my ISP runs a virus/spam filter or I'd be up my eyeballs in this crap.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  148. Right on target. by adagioforstrings · · Score: 1

    Exactly. There probably are admins who "coulda dunnit" but didn't, but I think there are a lot of us folks out there who can't install the latest patches because of corporate policy (sometimes it's even a good reason). Likewise, I'm not sure I know many (or even any) "IT guy" paid $74k/year to clean up this mess. I know I sure get paid a lot less than that.

  149. It's just another cost by Muggins+the+Mad · · Score: 1


    Well, I hope that all good CTO's are doing
    their jobs and factoring the cost of all this cleaning up into the TCO of their chosen computer system.

    - Muggins

  150. Re:The Slashdot story missed the interesting part. by bobbozzo · · Score: 1
    Actually, extending this, maybe the way to fight open machines is to cause the open machines to send themselves excessive traffic, rendering them fairly useless until their operators fix them, but not negatively impacting the rest of the net.

    The evil side in me says machines like that should all be wiped by the worm on a certain date, and then display a message to the user in every language to secure their damn computers.

    --
    Nothing to see here; Move along.
  151. definition by chloroquine · · Score: 2, Funny

    Um, what is this thing you call "vacation"? I keep hearing people talk about going on "vacation" but I've yet to experience this phenomenon.

    1. Re:definition by SoSueMe · · Score: 1
      Oh, I think you know "Vacation".
      Your journal says so:
      Skipped work Friday afternoon to go visit family halfway across the state.
    2. Re:definition by chloroquine · · Score: 1

      ah, but i worked friday morning and then again on saturday and sunday. for me vacation is more than a half day off.

  152. The law needs to assign responsibility by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We can argue until we're blue in the face about responsibility but frankly it doesn't matter. Make anyone vaguely connected (and catchable) responsible and the problem will be solved. Make MS responsible and they'll tighten up their OSes. Make users responsible for sending viruses from their computers and they'll soon put pressure on MS for better OSes and keep their virus checkers up-to-date. Make the PC vendors responsible and I'm sure we'll get imporvements too. But as it is we have a situation where nobody is held accountable and that means it's simply never going to be fixed.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:The law needs to assign responsibility by Firefly1 · · Score: 1
      Make anyone vaguely connected (and catchable) responsible and the problem will be solved.
      Ummm... no. 'Vaguely connected' does not repeat not necessarily equal 'guilty party'. Imagine, if you will, a scenario where your roommate committs murder, and the authourities can't find him. They do, however, find you, and since you're 'vaguely connected' and 'catchable', they decide you're guilty.
      Make users responsible for sending viruses from their computers...
      Many if not all viruses are meant to propogate without their hosts being aware of it. And since there will for the foreseeable future be a window of opportunity between news of an exploit and availability of a patch, there will always be people who are unaware that their systems have... guests. Can you really hold someone accountable for something which is beyond their control? Answer: no.
      --
      - White Knight of the Order of Mihoshi Enthusiasts
  153. Re: Wintel Users Never Learn by b!arg · · Score: 1

    I did the same about my Win2k Pro machine at home...Troll

    --

    Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
  154. evolving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.f-secure.com/v-descs/sobig_f.shtml "The worm will also attempt to download additional components when certain conditions are met. The condition, in this case, is that the time which is obtained from one the NTP servers (which addresses it has hard-coded inside its code) is Friday or Sunday (regardless of the week) between 19:00 and 22:00 UTC time. The worm will perform this test every hour. When the condition meets, it will attempt to retrieve further information from a predefined list of 20 master hosts. "

  155. Just filter by subject by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    Most corporate systems have filtering through subject lines or if they don't the client end sure does. Here are the subject lines you need to filter. A good admin can take care of this in very little time. No need to throw out the baby with the filthy virus infected bathwater.

  156. A story by jhoffoss · · Score: 1

    One of my coworkers "fixed" an infected computer twice. Both times, the network connection was shut back off. I sit down at the computer, find blast and welchia both active (not SoBig, at least), the antivirus definitions a week old, and the RPC vuln. patch installed. I don't understand how you forget steps one and two in removing this thing, but remember to apply the patch...

    --
    Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
  157. Matilda Malda? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a hot breakfast cereal.

  158. Re:infected and carrier are two different things by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
    Linux, Mac, & BSD servers can still be carriers of the virus so they also have to scan for it. If you run one of the other boxes, you still need AV to keep your 5% of the population from reinfection the 95% MS! Typically, they can't run the code, but File servers have this anoying habit of copying things exactly like they come in [MS munging things it saves is really a feature!] meaning that a file with a virus is still a latent bug waiting for a windows computer to download it and start the fun all over again!

    I have to deal with this with my IBM AS400. It can't run viruses or worms, but all my users store files on it. Thru the wonders of Mapped drives lovely worms still write their naughties to it and it happily accepts them. So you still have to clean it up with something or reinfect the whole shop again.

    I would be really cool/horrible if someone could create a true cross-platform bug via tcp/http calls or maybe java, php, or perl that all the big unices have. Not that I'm for the virus writers, but from a purely academic POV it would be cool...but only just once.

  159. Shared Source by donnz · · Score: 1

    What I would be keen to know is how many government "experts" spotted these problems under their suppa duppa shared source programs? It's not like the code is new, hell, looks like most of it comes from Win3.1 or before, so please post (anonymously if you wish) if you personnaly protected your government from these virus'.

    --
    -- Free software on every PC on every desk
  160. I'm seeing attached file for details by eieken · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Today is the day you should unsubscribe from all mailing lists if you know what is good for you. see attached file for details. I'll give you details you dirty #$%@^!

    --
    Meet new people, and kill them.
  161. Not good at all by instantnoodles · · Score: 1

    This is definitely not good at all. My server is being bombarded pretty heavily now, hard to imagine what is to come.

  162. Ideas on how to catch the perpetrators by mabu · · Score: 1

    I have some ideas on how we might be able to track down the source of these things..

    * E-mail honey pots

    You set up a vast array of e-mail boxes with their addresses well publicized in various forms. You collect data on the vires/worm propagation.

    Encourage people to donate old domains to the honey pot project. Publish instructions on remapping the MX record for domains that are no longer used. Direct them to various nodes in the honey pot array.

    * Collect information on earliest occurances of the vires/worms in order to track the source. Publish a web site which lists the earliest known date/time of the worm propagation to encourage others to beat it with their own submissions. Offer some incentive to whoever provides the evidence that leads to the author.

    The thing is, this type of service should not be managed by any company in the virus/worm removal industry. Companies like Mcaffee and Symantec, while being in the ideal position to collect details, have an inherent conflict of interest due to the fact that the more the vires/worms spread, the more money they make.

    1. Re:Ideas on how to catch the perpetrators by herrvinny · · Score: 1

      It's a good idea, all we need is some custom scripts to handle and classify all the mail.
      Any takers?

  163. Outlook trap by mabu · · Score: 1

    One thing that could really expedite the trapping of the vires/worms is to get Microsoft to add a specific entry to the address book of all new installations of Outlook. Normally the e-mail wouldn't be used or even visible, but would be accessible to worm programs that seek Outlook's address book for propagation sources. I'm sure theres a way of obfusicating the entry to thwart smarter worms that avoid using the honey pot e-mail entry.

    1. Re:Outlook trap by mabu · · Score: 1

      Another idea: Have windows update rotate this Outlook address book entry on a regular basis. WHAM, you have a system in place to immediately track the source of these things...

      Think Microsoft would do this? It sounds way too efficient doesn't it?

  164. Power Outage "Vacationers" not a problem by billstewart · · Score: 1
    They've had their computers turned off while they've been out - so they can install virus updates before turning on their email, and their email sysadmins can clean some things up and spam-filter them. Too bad if some of them really _did_ want to send a "Wicked Screensaver" to all their friends :-)

    And the amount of virus warning everybody's gotten is enough to reduce the percentage who click on the stupid attachment from 10% to 1% so the thing won't propagate as fast.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  165. Fast Cost-Effective Repair Technique by billstewart · · Score: 0
    1. Put the Knoppix Disk in the CD-ROM drive.
    2. Duct-tape the CD-ROM drive cover shut.
    3. Turn on the Big Red Switch.
    4. ....
    5. Profit!! Er, well, ok, at least stop losing...

    This won't always work, depending on the hardware - sometimes you'll need to use a different disk and type in "LILO".

    And if an "Unhappy Mac" icon appears on the screen when you boot, then remove the duct tape and the Knoppix disk, and rebooting will work just fine too.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  166. Email notification: A cure worse than the disease by greywalker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Sunner said that most of the problems caused by SoBig involve the time and cost of cleaning the worm from computer systems."
    My experience with this virus may be abnormal, but I have to completely disagree with that statement. As a dispatch tech for a large state university, I've been up to my eyes in emails related to the virus, but have only found However, the amount of email traffic on campus has been mind-boggling -- it even took down our mail servers a few times. And less than 10% of the emails were from the virus. Most of them were f*cking auto-notification emails from other servers that someone had sent the damn virus, which thanks to the spoofing feature, was almost never true. Why don't server admins turn off such notifications when dealing with a mass-mailer/spoofer virus? All these assorted servers managed to do was clog up our mail server with these meaningless "you have sent us a virus" emails that do nothing but contribute to any damage the does!!
    IMHO, the REAL cost of dealing with this virus was bearing the burden of 100,000 stupid auto-generated emails that other servers were sending us, in response to emails that didn't even come from us.

  167. Question by herrvinny · · Score: 1

    Sorry for posting again, but another thought just hit me. When anti-virus programs send their auto-notification junk emails, is there something common to all of them so the servers could filter them out? Like, is there a special flag that is set up?
    I'm really kind of new to web servers.

    1. Re:Question by Phil+Karn · · Score: 1

      Not really. There seem to be a zillion message formats, each in a half-zillion languages. It's a real pain in the ass to filter them all out.

  168. no by athen66 · · Score: 1

    No.

    It should read:

    You may want to consider installing OpenBSD on your computer to help you avoid this problem in the future.

    Damn Linux goons...

    1. Re:no by SYFer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, as long as you're going to go the BSD route, you may as well just spring for a shiny new Mac with OS X and be done with it. Although we Mac owners are certainly not immune to virii and their broader effects, we are certainly less frequently directly infected. This is one instance where small market share proves beneficial.

      Incidentally, the first infection I ever had on a Mac was the old Macro Virus which appeared shortly after I first welcomed Microsoft (via Office) onto my machine. Ah Microsoft!

      --
      "...all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness..." yada yada
    2. Re:no by miscGeek · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, haven't you heard....BSD is dead *ducks*

      --
      May the source be with you!
    3. Re:no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, where's the guy with the mathematical proof that there are -7 BSD users on and near Earth on any given day? I miss that guy.

  169. Exactly! by kylef · · Score: 1
    Personally, wouldn't mind seeing punitive charges for continuing to spread this kind of thing some number of weeks past the initial outbreak.

    That idea isn't politically correct, but it may be the ONLY way to get people to pay attention to the fact that their computer can cause huge amounts of problems if it's neglected.

    In some states, if you leave a firearm unlocked and someone steals it and uses it to commit a crime, you can be charged with the crime of "Failure to Secure a Firearm."

    For example, Massachusetts General laws Chapter 140-131L requires that firearms MUST be secured in a locked container or equipped with a tamper resistant mechanical lock. Failure to secure a large capacity weapon is a felony with a minimum of one year imprisonment and/or $1000 fine. Failure to secure a non-large capacity firearm is misdemeanor.

    Granted, we're not talking about life/death stakes here, but such unprotected systems can cause HUGE damages through denial of service attacks, as well as points of launch for worms and e-mail viruses. The lost time and productivity around the globe usually adds up to a significant amount of $$. That alone should be worth at LEAST a misdemeanor or citation with a fine!

  170. Better filters by unfortunateson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The points above are well taken: I intend on spiffing up my procmail recipes, but only as I am able to understand them.

    The enhancements suggested above are simple to implement, but are still crude band aids. While I doubt I would ever *really* want to receive an executable attachment (heck -- most places won't even let me SEND it, let alone receive it), I might want to

    (a) log it
    (b) bounce a 'hey stoopid' message back a legit senders to tell them that if they need to send me something, it shouldn't be an executable (that's why god made ZIP)

    There are some more complex procmail filters out there that specifically target certain worms. Is that more effective? I don't know. I can't understand them yet. I will soon. None of the procmail FAQs and "getting started" docs describe all those messy flags and things. I've got some more reading to do.

    Meanwhile, this one lets me get work done other than downloading and deleting SOBIG messages. A few other worms will slip through, but at least it's manageable.

    --
    Design for Use, not Construction!
    1. Re:Better filters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (b) bounce a 'hey stoopid' message back a legit senders to tell them that if they need to send me something, it shouldn't be an executable (that's why god made ZIP)

      But if the To: header is faked, you'll end up sending the warning to the wrong person.

  171. Re:Its bizarre, but is it really sobig.f ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am, so fuck you. I use the VDM to run old Infocom text adventures, and ocassionally WordPerfect 5.

    The file isn't really a "PIF", btw -- the file extention is just to fake Windows into running it.

  172. Re:The Slashdot story missed the interesting part. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh - just wait. If you read a description of Sobig.F, you'll see that all the Sobig variants are capable of running arbitrary code after receiving instructions via UDP. This has most often been used to set up proxy servers on users' machines.

    Spam is going to get worse very soon, because this worm was /written/ by spamming criminals and their ethics-free paid crackers.

  173. Re:ban unpatched PCs by killthiskid · · Score: 1

    We do this... as soon as the first packet with the signature of a known worm is transmitted from a computer, the IP that it originated from is block at the main router and very shortly after the port of the switch it is plugged into is shut off... it is amazing how fast a user responds when they have ZERO net access...

  174. Re:The Slashdot story missed the interesting part. by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    Here's an idea - just send the open machines MSBlaster, that will make them crash and take them off-line, but isn't that what has been happening anyway?

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  175. I've got about 15 messages... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

    of the type "your message could not be delivered", obviously related to Sobig. Does this mean the guy who signed me up to all those stupid mailing lists got infected, or is this the next stage of the virus? (most send back the attachment, a great way to clog a mailserver).

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  176. Re:ban unpatched PCs by jafiwam · · Score: 1

    "Software Update Service" it is called.

    It does work as advertised, note however that you must do some trickery (regedit) to get it to work on every PC, or use Group Policies or other stuff. (Those things make it less useful for small networks that are not likely to be doing group polices, etc.)

    With high bandwidth connections though, I found it easier to just sneak in and make it auto install the updates directly from MS.

  177. Taking the sting out of the virus attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Microsoft is making the choice that will cause it the least grief and all Windows users are paying for it.

    But I think Windows users paying for it now should smile when they remember that they saved $200 instead of buying the rock solid Mac with OS X. A small irritation such as SoBig has to be worth the money saved, don't you think?

  178. You're getting screwed! by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

    Hmm, at my work (big bank) 8 people getting paid $25,000/year cover 13 buildings with over 5000 desktops.

    Then again, we run virus-protection at the gateways, and the whole LAN is proxied-out, and we can push software updates to the users with ZenWorks instead of running out to machines manually.

    If you're paying techs $70K+/year, they should have deployed patches and virus updates WAY before anything broke out. Seriously, I could script up something to do that in 15 minutes, and I work for $19,500/year!

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    1. Re:You're getting screwed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I maintain over a hundred mission critical Solaris systems for my Fortune 500 company, putting in 60 hours a week, exempt status -and- no benifits, all for US $12,000 a year. Beat that!

    2. Re:You're getting screwed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beat that!

      Lots of people in the 3rd World would be happy to.

  179. 78k .pif file? by Nethead · · Score: 1

    Now I'm now Windows guru but all the .pif files I've seen are about 1kB in size. This virus tells Outlook that it's got a 78kB .pif and Outlook thinks that it's cool to run it. Is there no bounds checking at all going on here? SCO isn't the only software company smoking crack.

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  180. Save your inbox with procmail by bigberk · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is where procmail comes to the rescue! Add this rule:

    # Ignore W32/Sobig.f@MM
    :0 B
    * ^vZgwXohhqrN4MDHpZfjXC6Aye4uyh5TU7soFb85wpJILzujHN
    /dev/null

    This matches the worm on a base64 encoded line from its body. This is on the current variant I got flooded with; redirect the suckers to /dev/null. And if you get a NEW strain, just take an encoded body sample from it and make a new rule!

  181. Not to worry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft e-mailed me a patch yesterday, and again today. It contained an attachment called patch.exe, and the following message:

    Subject: Use this patch immediately!

    Dear friend , use this Internet Explorer patch now!
    There are dangerous virus in the Internet now!
    More than 500.000 already infected!


    The return address was security@microsoft.com, so I know this patch is safe. I'm so glad Microsoft security is looking out for me!

    1. Re:Not to worry! by RAMGarden · · Score: 1

      That's just funny. +1 for the funny.

      --
      --- Nothing is secure.
  182. New Patch Available by eastsidephil · · Score: 1

    Switch to Lotus Notes EMail! In addition to bomb-proof security you'll also get an exellent platform for developing web and groupware applications. Domino supports a wide range of industry standards for COM to Java.

  183. For the love of god by The+AtomicPunk · · Score: 1

    Why won't somebody write a virus that runs through Outlook and destroys the entire address book, turns off address learning, and thus eliminates 98% of the spam fired off by the next worm ???

  184. Re:Is Sobig really M$'s fault YES by ratfynk · · Score: 1
    Upon further investigation of these glaring linux security holes; 1. to do an escalated privilege attack you need to not know that there is a user logged in remotely. 2. you have to be stupid enough to set your ifconfig to alow remote users to log on, and be stupid enough to install a trojan on your system and does a keystroke log then sends it out to the attacker and hides all the tracks. Something which takes a real unix guru to create, and is on the level of a mad genius. Not just some VIS BASIC cut and paste code script kiddie that downloads virus warez kit from a friend. Not that mad dissafected Unix gurus do not exist but they are quite rare in the Linux. These trojans are few and far between and are picked up and shut out by the linux community very fast. They are trojans not viruses. 3. this sort of advanced attack cannot happen with windows software because you have to be administrator to install shit to the registry. RIGHT and every soBigf infected computer is running as administrator?

    Any OS that alows root (administrator) to be hacked from a visable hash table is security junkware. With windowsxp it is a simple as a script which will trigger esc-p, do not know if anybody has written an effective escape macro yet but like 'fdisk /mbr' it will get out of the bag. Security through obscure secrets is just plain stupid and MS has got to learn this. That is why I refuse to run anything past win98 or NT4, if it gets trashed who gives a shit. Just reinstall my complete clean backup and run it till the next big windows scare. I am not going to pay for insecure junkware I only use Linux for e-mail and I hose and clean my windows C partition whenever they get covered in bug shit! Symantec and MS can go to hell.

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  185. Re:Is Sobig really M$'s fault YES by CharlesEGrant · · Score: 1
    to do an escalated privilege attack you need to not know that there is a user logged in remotely.
    You don't seem to understand the issue. There are numerous bugs around the UNIX world that allow garden variety users to execute commands with root privileges. If I send you an executable as an attachment, and trick you into executing it, and the program can find and exploit one of those bugs, it can subsequently execute the commands of its choice with root privileges. That command may be to install a kernel module or any other damned thing they care to write into it. I will grant you that the common UNIX email clients make it a lot harder to trick a user into running an attachment, but it is by no means impossible as you claimed.
    ... effective escape macro yet but like 'fdisk /mbr'
    Are you refering to ANSI macro exploits? If so, you should be aware that they affect several UNIX terminal programs as well! See for example this story Getting Hacked Through Your Terminal
    I only use Linux for e-mail and I hose and clean my windows C partition whenever they get covered in bug shit! Symantec and MS can go to hell
    I'm not here to apologize for Microsoft's security gafes, only to warn you that Linux has its own set of security issues. You must keep up with the patches and security fixes on a Linux box just as surely as if you were running Windows box.
  186. how many messages did you receive? by wdebruij · · Score: 1

    So, let the games begin. How many messages did you receive? I'll double dare you! My personal records stand at :

    1.5 per minute for 24 consequtive hours (on wednesday)

    and

    1 per second in the last half an hour (!)

    Today I'll be leaving for a few days, but I won't dare to power off my computer, since my ISP's emailbox will become flooded in a few hours this way... aargh
    (oh, and I use linux, so no, it is not my own fault). My ISP does have a spambox, but they don't delete attachments, so what's the use?

  187. Re:Is Sobig really M$'s fault YES by ratfynk · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the info I do treat Slackware as a disposable OS install, I guess I have gotten too good at installing and configurating OSs. Come to mention it I once did get an email with an .exe that I was suspicious of so I checked it out in Wine rather than MS. Funny as hell it crashed my X server in Redhat 8! I checked to see if it had done anything else to the kernel but the diff came up clean so that was not the reason. Turned out it just made a funny call to the X server that caused a crash. I use e-mail for just that and nothing else, I know better. Yes I do keep Slackware up with the latest patches, but I do not worry as my inet logs tell me if there is any unusual shit going on. It is sure nice to take a pico at my pinging ports wonderland logs without using X first. Thats why I dumped Redhat, I never just boot into X!

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  188. 170,000 hits and climbing by Phil+Karn · · Score: 1
    I have so far logged 170,000 incoming attempts to send me the SoBig.F worm. The rate recently peaked near 14,000 per hour. All came to a single email address that I retired several years ago.

    Why? Because I wrote a particular piece of open-source software.

    See www.ka9q.net/worm for the gory details. There are some interesting plots at the end.

    1. Re:170,000 hits and climbing by Glenn+R-P · · Score: 1

      I got about 300 during the first hour or so on Tuesday, then my ISP
      (mail2world, who recently took over alum.rpi.edu) terminated my address.
      Same deal: my address appears in the README for an open source library in
      millions of computers.

  189. never mind .exe by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    Outlook/OE can't open or save ".doc" files. Does anyone know a decent word-processor that saves files in a format suitable for attaching to email?

  190. File extensions by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    And even if you check preferences to say show all file extensions, Windows still hides a couple of executable extensions (for shell scrap objects). You have to delve deep into the registry to say "show all file extensions. Including that one. Yes and that one too."

  191. Re: Wintel Users Never Learn by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

    Y'know, it's smug assholes like you that make me want to pick up a few books on OS X and write a virus for it. Were the whole world running OS X, most people would still be exploited by viruses, as that's the most common denominator. People who have been taught good security practices, on the other hand, will be unaffected, regardless of the platform they're running. My cousin, for example, is a computer novice, but at the same time, has been taught to check for security updates regularly, and more importantly, to treat all links and attachments as suspect and not to view them. If it's not worth creating as a webpage, it's not worth propogating.

    --

    Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

  192. Other systems suffer by hughk · · Score: 1
    This time even OpenVMS was affected, because they can be trying to do something legitimate with DCE and whilst an attack by the worm doesn't get very far, denial of service remains that. However only varients of window can be infected and propagate these worms.

    Even with OpenBSD, you are still fcked if every other packet thrown at you by your ISP is an attempted exploit. The attack may not get further but it won't help your connection!!!

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  193. Wrong! by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Informative
    As an example, I work with FDA approved and validated systems. You would not believe, and I can't be bothered, detailing the amount of documentation, version control and testing we use to guarantee 100% that the environment is *exactly* to spec.

    A new patch out from MS? Can we just stick it on? Nope. We need to test in depth, we need to formally do a performance qualification, and we need to document all this to the nth degree: this is medical data, and you can't take chances that a patch might affect it.

    Result? You don't rush out and patch stuff.

  194. time to shut the window? by geoff+lane · · Score: 1

    After this a lot of sites will just start blocking all external email including any attachment.

    Many will start blocking MIME encoded emails.

    It's a lot simpler than dealing with each new email problem as it arises.

  195. Put Debian on your Wintel stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about that?

  196. NOT Killthiskid, I meant plover by aldousd666 · · Score: 1

    Sorry about mucking up the thread with a correction, but I didn't want to give undue credit

    --
    Speak for yourself.
  197. competance ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i know there's more then computers, but it strikes me odd that the boss of a comapny acctually opens attachemnts that are not safe and then fires the IT staff? then again in the beginnng there was this IT-staff briefing for all emploies telling them about pros and cons of attachments and which are safe and which not ... no idea. so the boss has competance to hire and fire but has to trust the guy he hires for his computer-protection ... somthing/wierd.

  198. Class action perhaps by axxackall · · Score: 1
    • ... Already the worm has caused an estimated $50 million of damage in the United States alone...
    • ... It briefly brought freight and computer traffic in Washington, D.C. to a halt ...
    • ... grounded Air Canada ...
    • ... slowed down computer systems at many major companies such as advanced technology firm Lockheed Martin ...
    • ... 1 out of 17 e-mails ...
    • ... Internet service provider AOL (part of the AOL Time Warner group which includes CNN) says it scanned 40.5 million e-mails and found the virus in more than half. SoBig accounted for 98 percent of all viruses found. The e-mail-borne worm arrives with various subject ...

    I wonder how much more damage will it bring to any major national economy, like US one, untill a goverment will bring Microsoft to the court for the class action?

    Let's face it. In many countries half of the cigaret pack face is busy by the warning about a potential death from the smoking. Where is such a warning on the face of every Microsoft product box warning that the use of any Microsoft products may bring the whole economy down?

    --

    Less is more !
  199. You have to *read* the article for it to advertise by mulhall · · Score: 1

    ...This is Slashdot, nobody RTFAs so no advertising. ;)

  200. what about this secondary attact on 8/22 by Allah · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://tinyurl.com/ku3u

    August 22, 2003 07:38 AM US Eastern Timezone

    A Potentially Massive Internet Attack Starts Today; Sobig.F Downloads and Executes a Mysterious Program on Friday at 19:00 UTC

    SAN JOSE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Aug. 22, 2003--F-Secure Corporation is warning about a new level of attack to be unleashed by the Sobig.F worm today.
    Windows e-mail worm Sobig.F, which is currently the most widespread worm in the world, has created massive e-mail outages globally since it was found on Tuesday the 18th of August -- four days ago. The worm spreads itself via infected e-mail attachments in e-mails with a spoofed sender address. Total amount of infected e-mails seen in the Internet since this attack started is close to 100 million.

    However, the Sobig.F worm has a surprise attack in its sleeve. All the infected computers are entering a second phase today, on Friday the 22nd of August, 2003. These computers are using atom clocks to synchronize the activation to start exactly at the same time around the world: at 19:00:00 UTC (12:00 in San Francisco, 20:00 in London, 05:00 on Saturday in Sydney).

    On this moment, the worm starts to connect to machines found from an encrypted list hidden in the virus body. The list contains the address of 20 computers located in USA, Canada and South Korea.

    "These 20 machines seem to be typical home PCs, connected to the Internet with always-on DSL connections," says Mikko Hypponen, Director of Anti-Virus Research at F-Secure. "Most likely the party behind Sobig.F has broken into these computers and they are now being misused to be part of this attack."

    The worm connects to one of these 20 servers and authenticates itself with a secret 8-byte code. The servers respond with a web address. Infected machines download a program from this address -- and run it. At this moment it is completely unknown what this mystery program will do.

    F-Secure has been able to break into this system and crack the encryption, but currently the web address sent by the servers doesn't go anywhere. "The developers of the virus know that we could download the program beforehand, analyse it and come up with countermeasures," says Hypponen. "So apparently their plan is to change the web address to point to the correct address or addresses just seconds before the deadline. By the time we get a copy of the file, the infected computers have already downloaded and run it."

    Right now, nobody knows what this program does. It could do damage, like deleting files or unleash network attacks. Earlier versions of Sobig have executed similar but simpler routines. With Sobig.E, the worm downloaded a program which removed the virus itself (to hide its tracks), and then started to steal users network and web passwords. After this the worm installed a hidden email proxy, which has been used by various spammers to send their bulk commercial emails through these machines without the owners of the computers knowing anything about it. Sobig.F might do something similar -- but we won't know until 19:00 UTC today.

    "As soon as we were able to crack the encryption used by the worm to hide the list of the 20 machines, we've been trying to close them down," explains Mikko Hypponen. F-Secure has been working with officials, authorities and various CERT organizations to disconnect these machines from the Internet. "Unfortunately, the writers of this virus have been waiting for this move too." These 20 machines are chosen from the networks of different operators, making it quite likely that there won't be enough time to take them all down by 19:00 UTC. Even if just one stays up, it will be enough for the worm.

    The advanced techniques used by the worm make it quite obvious it's not written by a typical teenage virus writer. The fact that previous Sobig variants we're used by spammers on a large scale adds an element of financial gain. Who's behind all this? "Looks like organized crime to me," comments Mikko Hypponen.

    F-Secure is monitoring the

  201. Crap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I just spit coffee all over myself reading that.

    Now I gotta go home.

    But thanks. That was fucking hilarious!

  202. Re:close but no cigar! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
    It's close to what I asked for, but not quite. It still requires a Win2k server to host it, and doesn't work for older clients. It's a neat tool, but it still illustrates my point that MS is more interested in control [win2k server + cals + win2k+ clients] than in fixing the problems. All I want is a mirror server and method to get the patches saved without manually finding and downloading them all.

    McAfee has a great tool for their AV. I set one PC [any PC with McAfee AV!] to "mirror" the files to a location daily, then point the updaters on the rest of the PCs to that location and they get what they need. Nice and simple--but no McAfee control over my sholder every time!

  203. damn right.. by i8urtaco · · Score: 1

    The worst is yet to come. I work at a college and next week is when all professors will return back for the fall semester. Not only do we at computer services have to worry about (more) staff getting infected with the sobig virus, but we also have to worry about the older virii that have been waiting for them on our mail server for the past few months.

  204. eat me. by twitter · · Score: 1
    Because they are students computers. When you start going to college, you'll understand this.

    Nice flame, dipshit. I've got a BA and a BS I can show you, but I'd rather fold them into sharp corners and ... well, you know. I also know that trolls like you generally recomend restrictions on student computing. Well, when you are not filling up the world with useless Israeli/Plaestinian posts.

    College. Students. They don't give a fuck about Linux. Why is it so hard for you to understand that some people like Windows?

    People who don't care generally can't tell the difference between Windoze and KDE. Very few people actually like Microsoft. Most people put up with it because that's what their PC came with. Anyone who's used free software for any length of time knows windoze blows.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.