3. Women are just as likely to be sociopathic as men. The difference is that the behavior is tolerated, or even encouraged as 'empowerment.'
I really don't know where that came from since you've definitely heard of Balmer's chair throwing and I'm pretty sure neither of us have heard of a female exec who got away with that sort of thing. I really cannot see how your point can be considered correct in any way - western society likes women to be quiet and treats most who are not badly. Where's the female Trump?
With respect I think Bruce Perens is using the dictionary instead of gut feeling and guesswork. WTF is it with people and personal definitions? Has "shock jock" radio or similar fucked up people's heads?
There's a movie out now called "The Sufferagettes" so even the mainstream who don't have a grandma older than WWII are aware that the "hostility" was already there at least about injust treatment. It's not a criticism just pointing out that details get lost especially when putting focus on a symptom, such as a book read by a tiny percentage of people versus the situation it is describing.
I'm writing a book about how people use their brains
We could do with a few more now that Oliver Sachs is not around anymore to write them.
Unless there's a motivation such as clickbait and not a random factor. However I'd still say not every one, mostly just ones where the news was not already old in time for a story to be blown out of proportion on a Friday for clickbait. Those stories collect a LOT of comments so presumably a lot of people are exposed to the advertising.
Which is always going to be true if a word is made up and then used as a definition for a extreme strawman that among other things lies. Can we please get back on topic instead of from a book by political hack that stacked the Hugos to push some weird male supremicist shit just for the sake of it?
The topic as I see it is just an example of straight out bullying - pretty hard to excuse that even if you consider yourself superior by birth.
but their goal is, to some extent, to avoid relying on people being particularly competent.
Unfortunately that includes the people writing systemd. A binary log that is written to by several things at once if an example of people who have either never heard of a race condition or do not care if the log gets corrupted for example - utter newbie mistake. A computer that won't boot because systemd can't work out what to do with a usb mouse dongle is one of the many examples of how immature the system is despite a decade of work - it's parallel when it's insane to be so and serial when it should be able to do several things at once instead of getting hung on what to do with a USB device when it's really none of it's business and it should let the kernel do that job instead. Their goal is really just to bring a lot of separate things under the control of a single small group that does not have the patience to solve one problem before they expand to replace another bit of software.
This is the sort of game that really pisses me off about the issue - you keep on pretending to be stupid enough to think that a "well regulated militia" is about individuals learning to shoot. The "I'm too dumb to chew gum" distraction trick may work for cocaine ravaged ex-DJs or at school debates but the level of discussion here is supposed to be beyond that and less heavy on distractions to hide holes in dogma.
I've got a few reservations about your intelligence organisations after the Dubai death squad with Australian passports and other issues so I'll have to take their promises with a truckload of salt. As I tried to point out to you in an earlier discussion truth has been a very early casualty of war with the current situation and current administration.
Neither company is willing to provide either proper OSS drivers or the technical specifications needed for somebody else to write them.
That's just a good example of a consequence of software patents. There's still the stuff that SGI got burned with in the courts lurking in there somewhere because the patents are way too broad apart from bring a stupid concept in the first place.
Or how I need basically two full desktop environments at all times, because neither ecosystem has a monopoly on good apps.
Just run g"whatever" on your k desktop or vice versa and everything just works FFS. Where did the silly claim come from? The only times I've had to run two full desktop environments was when I was remotely running some solaris stuff that only liked 8 bit color, so I had the 8 bit desktop and the full color desktop - and that was over a decade ago.
Yet the first Kindles, Kobo readers etc, 100% linux and X based, seemed to get it completely right where you have trouble. I think it's mostly that LCDs suck for reading for more than a few minutes at a time.
You see, distros don't have major OEMs going out of their way to make solid consumer computers with working drivers that are 1) supported, and b) tuned to the product for stability and performance
ASUS did that with the eeePC, it worked well for what it was spawning the Netbook craze, then after lunch with MS at a trade show the Taiwanese CEO apologized for it and went MS only from then on. MS can put a lot of pressure on OEMs. The pressure required to make an Asian CEO lose serious face by making an apology for a successful product must have been considerable.
Well that's a gnome problem not really a "linux" one, sort of like blaming Microsoft for Flash even if it's giving you real problems. The gnome people sort of went their own way without caring a lot about a variety of issues. A good way to troubleshoot such stuff in the future is to boot off a knoppix CD since it's got a simple desktop and has been tried out on a very wide range of hardware including very old and slow stuff. If it works there the hardware is fine.
By avoiding deep legal shit dating back to SGI. Just install their drivers that actually work instead of bitching about Nvidia when the real problem is software patents.
Israel has pledged not to spy on the US. I know the Israeli leadership, as well as the security services, take this pledge very seriously
Then again, Israel did leak internal details from the Iran negotiations, details that it was not officially exposed to. One has to wonder how those were acquired.
Doesn't the contradiction between those two statements imply that it's business as usual despite some recent pledge?
The NRA is the premier organization in the US promoting firearms safety
So they fail on a large scale then while a tinpot town's pistol club may actually succeed for their members.
The political advocacy is a secondary thing
Seriously? You really don't think much of the intelligence of the readers on this site if you are pushing that line. Are you so stupid and ignorant that you believe that yourself? Take a look at the list of board members - it's all about political contacts and PR experience. Their line of thinking is "Why have a skilled marine drill instructor when an actor who played one is available". It acts just like those unions that became politically powerful and gave unions a bad name, although I've never heard of a union that had a traitor that sold weapons to Hezbolla just after they had blown up a hundred marines on the board.
Why pretend that the OPINION "The unorganized part is the people, and being that they are unorganized and not provided with firearms by the government they have the right to keep and bear firearms themselves" is in there when it is not? Your interpretation is so utterly stupid that it implies that felons in prison should have the right to be armed. I really don't get why you kids swallow such shit that is sent in your direction by a very political gun owners union that grew out of a sporting club. Will you be taking lessons from the Teamsters next? Gun ownership is a responsibility, treating it otherwise is irresponsible.
Stop avoiding it and pretending it's about keeping gun in good condition, the three words go together - the drafters were not as stupid as you like to pretend they are. The amendment is about arms for the "well regulated militia" and not a licence for a very political gun owners union (a million miles away from a "well regulated militia" by any stretch) to do anything they like.
Obviously not, there's nothing at all about that in the above post. Who taught you that bad habit of using "You mean like" to put words in other people's mouths?
Slashdot Mirror
I really don't know where that came from since you've definitely heard of Balmer's chair throwing and I'm pretty sure neither of us have heard of a female exec who got away with that sort of thing. I really cannot see how your point can be considered correct in any way - western society likes women to be quiet and treats most who are not badly. Where's the female Trump?
That insult has pretty well always been that as used on this site. It often makes a fine idiot detector or anger detector.
With respect I think Bruce Perens is using the dictionary instead of gut feeling and guesswork.
WTF is it with people and personal definitions? Has "shock jock" radio or similar fucked up people's heads?
There's a movie out now called "The Sufferagettes" so even the mainstream who don't have a grandma older than WWII are aware that the "hostility" was already there at least about injust treatment.
It's not a criticism just pointing out that details get lost especially when putting focus on a symptom, such as a book read by a tiny percentage of people versus the situation it is describing.
We could do with a few more now that Oliver Sachs is not around anymore to write them.
Unless there's a motivation such as clickbait and not a random factor.
However I'd still say not every one, mostly just ones where the news was not already old in time for a story to be blown out of proportion on a Friday for clickbait. Those stories collect a LOT of comments so presumably a lot of people are exposed to the advertising.
Are you still in school? If so you are in for a bit of a shock when you enter the workforce.
Which is always going to be true if a word is made up and then used as a definition for a extreme strawman that among other things lies.
Can we please get back on topic instead of from a book by political hack that stacked the Hugos to push some weird male supremicist shit just for the sake of it?
The topic as I see it is just an example of straight out bullying - pretty hard to excuse that even if you consider yourself superior by birth.
"Well regulated" goes with "militia". Pretending the three don't go together is an act of calling the drafters idiots. Please stop doing that.
Unfortunately that includes the people writing systemd.
A binary log that is written to by several things at once if an example of people who have either never heard of a race condition or do not care if the log gets corrupted for example - utter newbie mistake. A computer that won't boot because systemd can't work out what to do with a usb mouse dongle is one of the many examples of how immature the system is despite a decade of work - it's parallel when it's insane to be so and serial when it should be able to do several things at once instead of getting hung on what to do with a USB device when it's really none of it's business and it should let the kernel do that job instead.
Their goal is really just to bring a lot of separate things under the control of a single small group that does not have the patience to solve one problem before they expand to replace another bit of software.
This is the sort of game that really pisses me off about the issue - you keep on pretending to be stupid enough to think that a "well regulated militia" is about individuals learning to shoot. The "I'm too dumb to chew gum" distraction trick may work for cocaine ravaged ex-DJs or at school debates but the level of discussion here is supposed to be beyond that and less heavy on distractions to hide holes in dogma.
I've got a few reservations about your intelligence organisations after the Dubai death squad with Australian passports and other issues so I'll have to take their promises with a truckload of salt. As I tried to point out to you in an earlier discussion truth has been a very early casualty of war with the current situation and current administration.
That's just a good example of a consequence of software patents. There's still the stuff that SGI got burned with in the courts lurking in there somewhere because the patents are way too broad apart from bring a stupid concept in the first place.
Knoppix is a good start since you can try it out from CDROM without it doing a thing to the installed system.
Just run g"whatever" on your k desktop or vice versa and everything just works FFS. Where did the silly claim come from? The only times I've had to run two full desktop environments was when I was remotely running some solaris stuff that only liked 8 bit color, so I had the 8 bit desktop and the full color desktop - and that was over a decade ago.
Yet the first Kindles, Kobo readers etc, 100% linux and X based, seemed to get it completely right where you have trouble. I think it's mostly that LCDs suck for reading for more than a few minutes at a time.
ASUS did that with the eeePC, it worked well for what it was spawning the Netbook craze, then after lunch with MS at a trade show the Taiwanese CEO apologized for it and went MS only from then on. MS can put a lot of pressure on OEMs. The pressure required to make an Asian CEO lose serious face by making an apology for a successful product must have been considerable.
The site has problems at the moment and nobody has quoted it, could you please give an example of one of those "90% of issues"?
Well that's a gnome problem not really a "linux" one, sort of like blaming Microsoft for Flash even if it's giving you real problems. The gnome people sort of went their own way without caring a lot about a variety of issues.
A good way to troubleshoot such stuff in the future is to boot off a knoppix CD since it's got a simple desktop and has been tried out on a very wide range of hardware including very old and slow stuff. If it works there the hardware is fine.
That's what the "legacy" proprietary driver is for, it's a different download - but it sounds like Nouveau did the job anyway.
By avoiding deep legal shit dating back to SGI.
Just install their drivers that actually work instead of bitching about Nvidia when the real problem is software patents.
Doesn't the contradiction between those two statements imply that it's business as usual despite some recent pledge?
So they fail on a large scale then while a tinpot town's pistol club may actually succeed for their members.
Seriously? You really don't think much of the intelligence of the readers on this site if you are pushing that line. Are you so stupid and ignorant that you believe that yourself? Take a look at the list of board members - it's all about political contacts and PR experience. Their line of thinking is "Why have a skilled marine drill instructor when an actor who played one is available". It acts just like those unions that became politically powerful and gave unions a bad name, although I've never heard of a union that had a traitor that sold weapons to Hezbolla just after they had blown up a hundred marines on the board.
Why pretend that the OPINION "The unorganized part is the people, and being that they are unorganized and not provided with firearms by the government they have the right to keep and bear firearms themselves" is in there when it is not?
Your interpretation is so utterly stupid that it implies that felons in prison should have the right to be armed.
I really don't get why you kids swallow such shit that is sent in your direction by a very political gun owners union that grew out of a sporting club. Will you be taking lessons from the Teamsters next?
Gun ownership is a responsibility, treating it otherwise is irresponsible.
Stop avoiding it and pretending it's about keeping gun in good condition, the three words go together - the drafters were not as stupid as you like to pretend they are. The amendment is about arms for the "well regulated militia" and not a licence for a very political gun owners union (a million miles away from a "well regulated militia" by any stretch) to do anything they like.
Obviously not, there's nothing at all about that in the above post.
Who taught you that bad habit of using "You mean like" to put words in other people's mouths?