if there is enough to convince a large part of the Senate.
So he's not above the law, then? Seems that the impeachment process is well defined in law.
After impeachment the senate votes. That's the only thing that can touch him. A decision by a group of people, just like a medieval bunch of lords, instead of the rule of law. Guilt or innocence doesn't matter only factional numbers.
So which race is muslim again? I'll wait for you to figure out where you went wrong.
Let's quote your own words to see why I wrote that:
people were afraid to call police/terrorist tiplines/etc for fear of being labeled "racist" because muslim
By the stupid argument you are attempting (which race is muslim again) no white supremicists are racist, and it also contradicts your claim that people are scared about being seen as racist as well. You are trying to take it both ways and attempting to blame me for something that is your own mistake if it's a mistake at all.
One thing showing your bit of filth as bullshit is that several people in Barking did report on one of the perpetrators before the act and were not scared of being seen as being racists in doing so.
Russia, just like they benefit with the very obvious calling card of poisoning people with Polonium. How do you think the Russian people would react to Putin managing to throw the US election considering that there is so much hate of the USA over there at the moment with sanctions etc? Don't you think they would respect him more for something like that?
The problem with allowing corps to hack back is that you've only got their word that someone hacked them first.
True - a good example is the Australian Census "hack" that turned out to be allocating less resources than Slashdot has to a site that was expecting around five million hits around 7pm on a Tuesday night when everyone had been told to log in. There were loud screams of "hack" to try to pretend that it hadn't been mismanaged.
It's an IP address. It's not necessarily the compromised system anymore, or maybe never was because the IP address in nearly every case is a gateway and not the actual compromised system. You've build a vast pile of irrelevant words on your faulty premise.
Thanks, that explains it. Also explains why this does not touch me in the slightest. Will give me a nice laugh every time it is used against me in the future though as it says far more about the person using the insult than the one being insulted.
Indeed. Truly pathetic attempts at bullying. Another that seems to be on the rise (or maybe I've only just noticed it recently) is attempts at bullying that question reading ability. Is literacy on the decline or something? You'd think it would be quite a strange sort of attack to have on a site like this where everyone has read quite a bit.
You've linked to things that do not support your assertions up to and including "And they're afraid of losing their job if they speak up. Of being attacked by a lynch mob on twitter for saying something"
It's kind of disgusting seeing someone actually use a tragedy to push such a petty little agenda as a "crusade against political correctness".
You are clearly suggesting that speech suggesting something bad about a person in a minority group is being self-supressed in the UK and USA to the point where criminal actions are ignored, when in reality they have been reported because your scared little strawman terrified of some sort of mythical PC police does not exist.
It's utter bullshit designed to use victims of crime to push your disgusting little agenda.
The "line that I'm pushing" is people are afraid of doing something and being labeled racist for doing it.
It's not just utter bullshit that didn't happen (see other people's posts) but bullshit attempting to push a racist agenda. Racists are too scared to speak out? Pull the other one - it's got bells on it. What a bit of slime you are.
Really? Masses of quivering weakings like yourself? I don't think so. Most people are nowhere near as pathetic as you think they are. Perhaps you should consider being less a pathetic seeker of blame yourself.
The idea of "fighting back" in the last week was a deal for billions of dollars worth of weapons to the country spreading the twisted cult that's given all of Islam and all of the middle east a bad name - epic fail there. The whaddists (such as Daash/ISIL) must be laughing at how stupid we are, helping those who are funding and supplying them instead of cutting off their money supply and making it more difficult for them to influence people like the bunch of criminals that attacked in London. They WANT us to treat it like a war, and attack the mainstream so they can get more recruits to their cult from the mainstream.
people were afraid to call police/terrorist tiplines/etc for fear of being labeled "racist" because muslim
Seriously? Most people are not that sort of quivering weakling fearing being called names. Are you? If so keep in mind that you are a rarity and there is no point projecting.
But that's equivocation: You are not using "conservative" in the same sense that the earlier commenter did.
Incorrect. Spectacularly so. There is hardly anything less conservative than a family that has made politics it's profession of choice for more than a century.
and keep paying for it decades after you realize you got in bed with the devil.
I had some loser who claimed to be subcontracting to Microsoft threaten a software audit on me a couple of years ago on the basis of an NT4 server licence and something like five CALS not being renewed since 1998 or 1999. The place went to Samba some time around then.
If you think they were not conservatives then you have a lot to learn about politics. What Christopher Hitchens wrote about Bill Clinton is a good start.
Slashdot Mirror
Don't worry, he'll just order a strike of a ridiculous number of missiles on a strip of concrete and it will be repaired the same afternoon.
if there is enough to convince a large part of the Senate.
So he's not above the law, then? Seems that the impeachment process is well defined in law.
After impeachment the senate votes.
That's the only thing that can touch him.
A decision by a group of people, just like a medieval bunch of lords, instead of the rule of law.
Guilt or innocence doesn't matter only factional numbers.
Have I dumbed it down enough yet?
"Racist agenda"
So which race is muslim again? I'll wait for you to figure out where you went wrong.
Let's quote your own words to see why I wrote that:
By the stupid argument you are attempting (which race is muslim again) no white supremicists are racist, and it also contradicts your claim that people are scared about being seen as racist as well. You are trying to take it both ways and attempting to blame me for something that is your own mistake if it's a mistake at all.
One thing showing your bit of filth as bullshit is that several people in Barking did report on one of the perpetrators before the act and were not scared of being seen as being racists in doing so.
Do you really like having people laugh at you?
The Senate does. Trump is above the law and above Congress so long as the Senate comes down on his side in any impeachment/s.
Russia, just like they benefit with the very obvious calling card of poisoning people with Polonium.
How do you think the Russian people would react to Putin managing to throw the US election considering that there is so much hate of the USA over there at the moment with sanctions etc? Don't you think they would respect him more for something like that?
Except it wasn't the CIA. It was a fucking PR agency employed by one of Baby Bush's staffers.
Good to know that throwing an election isn't as bad as having a private email server. Maybe Hillary should have tried that instead?
True - a good example is the Australian Census "hack" that turned out to be allocating less resources than Slashdot has to a site that was expecting around five million hits around 7pm on a Tuesday night when everyone had been told to log in.
There were loud screams of "hack" to try to pretend that it hadn't been mismanaged.
It's an IP address.
It's not necessarily the compromised system anymore, or maybe never was because the IP address in nearly every case is a gateway and not the actual compromised system.
You've build a vast pile of irrelevant words on your faulty premise.
Thanks, that explains it. Also explains why this does not touch me in the slightest. Will give me a nice laugh every time it is used against me in the future though as it says far more about the person using the insult than the one being insulted.
Indeed. Truly pathetic attempts at bullying.
Another that seems to be on the rise (or maybe I've only just noticed it recently) is attempts at bullying that question reading ability. Is literacy on the decline or something? You'd think it would be quite a strange sort of attack to have on a site like this where everyone has read quite a bit.
Due to some utter stupidity the President is above the law and what ultimately matters is if there is enough to convince a large part of the Senate.
You've linked to things that do not support your assertions up to and including "And they're afraid of losing their job if they speak up. Of being attacked by a lynch mob on twitter for saying something"
It's kind of disgusting seeing someone actually use a tragedy to push such a petty little agenda as a "crusade against political correctness".
You are clearly suggesting that speech suggesting something bad about a person in a minority group is being self-supressed in the UK and USA to the point where criminal actions are ignored, when in reality they have been reported because your scared little strawman terrified of some sort of mythical PC police does not exist.
It's utter bullshit designed to use victims of crime to push your disgusting little agenda.
It's not just utter bullshit that didn't happen (see other people's posts) but bullshit attempting to push a racist agenda.
Racists are too scared to speak out? Pull the other one - it's got bells on it.
What a bit of slime you are.
I'm blind to you saying the problem that racists are the real victims here?
No - I can see exactly what shit you are up to by pushing this line.
So trying the "I am not doing X you are doing X" playground argument on for size now?
Really? Masses of quivering weakings like yourself?
I don't think so.
Most people are nowhere near as pathetic as you think they are. Perhaps you should consider being less a pathetic seeker of blame yourself.
The idea of "fighting back" in the last week was a deal for billions of dollars worth of weapons to the country spreading the twisted cult that's given all of Islam and all of the middle east a bad name - epic fail there. The whaddists (such as Daash/ISIL) must be laughing at how stupid we are, helping those who are funding and supplying them instead of cutting off their money supply and making it more difficult for them to influence people like the bunch of criminals that attacked in London.
They WANT us to treat it like a war, and attack the mainstream so they can get more recruits to their cult from the mainstream.
Seriously?
Most people are not that sort of quivering weakling fearing being called names.
Are you?
If so keep in mind that you are a rarity and there is no point projecting.
That's starting five years after I stopped showing it to students because it was teaching them bad habits.
I'm not just guessing here.
It's a throwback to analogue computers without the careful mathematical optimisation that was usually employed before plugging in the cables.
Incorrect. Spectacularly so. There is hardly anything less conservative than a family that has made politics it's profession of choice for more than a century.
I had some loser who claimed to be subcontracting to Microsoft threaten a software audit on me a couple of years ago on the basis of an NT4 server licence and something like five CALS not being renewed since 1998 or 1999. The place went to Samba some time around then.
Yes, it's a teaching tool. :)
You only use those methods when they kount
If you think they were not conservatives then you have a lot to learn about politics.
What Christopher Hitchens wrote about Bill Clinton is a good start.