He made a fool of powerful "Horse Judges" promoted seven levels above their competence where they were caught out doing "a heck of a job", so he's been trapped in Moscow out of spite.
It's not "Russia" but a US resident who used to work in USSR intelligence, so it's a guess that needs to be taken with a bucketful of salt. It may be true in a stopped clock being right twice a day way but it's an opinion shouldn't be trusted without hearing from another source a bit closer to the action who may be able to offer something other than an opinion.
So that's five examples of that industrial that "never happens" so far. I suggest you stop this disgusting display of denial. Your teachers would be appalled at what appears to be the idea the history is the self-serving story as written by the victors and not the actual path to victory.
As for your link, is that some failed attempt to show off that you have actually read a book with long words in it some time in your life? It does not back up your argument about there being no industrial espionage and is a pretty flimsy justification at suggesting that it's all OK if it's government owned enterprises being spied on - which in some of these cases doesn't apply anyway (eg. a US law firm with an Indonesian tobacco company as a client). I find it very insulting that you are putting it forward as if I am unaware that most states have some involvement in private enterprise. So the only mystery here is why are you misleading people on this website? What brings a person with a political "science" focus that appears to think the study of climate is no science to a technically orientated website to mislead the readers here? Can you answer that one?
If you'd tried a simple google search about the industrial espionage incident I mentioned then you would have found one of the many news articles (several from front pages) that mentioned it and would have not have produced such ridiculous rubbish as some of your assertions above.
Your problem seems to be you read the papers, and take them at face value
As distinct from what - making shit up, denying reality and calling people who are aware of the world around them liars? It appears that you are taking a very childish attitude to the website and showing zero respect to the people who read it. I hope the "social media manipulator" gig pays well because you need some sort of recompense for being a useful little idiot.
Don't you see it as somewhat pathetic that due to blindly following a party line you have lost in a "history fight" to an engineer? Get your head out of the sand, stop relying on being spoon fed and look the world for yourself. That military history stuff you wanted to be spoon fed is in the fucking library and if not there are interlibrary loans, conference papers etc. A degree is supposed to teach you how to learn and not be an endpoint. What the hell brings a guy that thinks "have you ever read political science" is some sort of insult to this place in the first place (I suspect I read a textbook on the topic thirty years before you were born although I never formally studied the topic and find it a bit depressing currently to be honest). Are you some sort of "social media" worker paid to stir up trouble? What's with the denial of items that were major news stories internationally? What is motivating you so much that you do not are that your are making yourself look incompetent in your chosen field of study? Is it Soviet style revisionism in the hope that somebody in The Party will give you a plum job as Commisar?
You didn't bother to link stuff to back up your assertions when you went as far as calling me a liar but I'm supposed to? Put aside those high school mass debating tricks and remember that you are supposed to be grown up now and have other resources at your disposal. blockquote>nobody's willing to link to the actual evidence
Nobody? There was an inquiry and I helpfully named the prominent members for you above - providing the information of that for you directly instead of making you chase links everywhere.
Besides it's very clear that you are bluffing so I just have to state facts instead of convince someone who already knows about them but is pretending not to.
As I wrote, treading water:( Hopefully that outlier will become a trend and hopefully it will take less than ten years while some electronics industry still exists in the USA to take up the work.
I gave you far more examples than you asked for but you just have petty excuses. Did you really study history? I seem to be doing better than you here as just an engineer that bothers to read a newspaper instead of ignoring the world. Where is your apology for calling me a liar over the clove cigarette thing that was widely printed internationally? Your closest source is probably the New York Times since it's on their web page.
Pick a field outside of the military (or even inside the military with rocket engines coming from Russia) and it is a shambles, especially with computer and electronic equipment. Try getting something done with a "US" manufacturer when there is a holiday in China or a big snowstorm over there and you'll see exactly how much of a shambles it is. Not a complete failure but some stupid outsourcing choices have removed a competitive edge and some industries have to rely on government enforced trade barriers to survive at all. Personally I see it as due to seeing the ideal as people like Edsel Ford instead of Henry Ford - the cult of the specialist manager with no clue about what they are managing dropped into a "too big to fail" situation and seen as a success. Today even people like Donald Trump with a vastly negative net worth are seen as winners because they pinned the consequences of their multiple failures on others. You can't run things so badly without consequences, hence the slip to number two and a continued decline.
Problems like those can still happen with local manufacturing, but they get noticed and resolved in days, not weeks.
Once again, an example of my point. A concentration of industry and the designers having access to the process line/s makes a massive difference. Selling the farm to China, Mexico etc removes those advantages.
thanks to a string of unforeseen manufacturing and supply-chain snafus
That's why China already owns the USA's ass in manufacturing. There are too many holes in the manufacturing capability now while in China the place to make that other thing is just down the road - like it used to be in the USA.
How about Petrobras, Huawei and German communications companies then? Are Richard A. Clarke, Michael J. Morell, Geoffrey R. Stone, Cass R. Sunstein and Peter Swire wrong - yet you are somehow correct?
That's not going to happen so long as Microsoft has a lot of pull in the game industry. It's a market dominance and agenda thing and not a technical thing.
Just pass the test the same way you could in 2000 and download the NVIDIA or AMD driver from their websites. If you want a dead simple answer without artificial restrictions that's all you have to do - instead of whining about how your artificial restriction is making things hard. In fact such a post makes you look so stupid that I strongly suspect you have an agenda to push and do not care if you look stupid to many so long as you manage to fool the naive. Is that what is going on here?
Instead of just pushing out noise I suggest you use those google skills of yours and find that clove cigarette example I referred to so that you'll be informed in what you are writing about - among many other place it was in the New York Times FFS. I'm getting the very strong impression that you think political "science" is a real science and the study of climate is not. Are you really that sort of person? If so, why are you bothering people here pushing your Party line on a site with an engineering and science focus?
With a little bit of logic ability, the car would know what the speed limit was for that time and date.
A couple of leap years back Zune's stopped working for a day and last time Azure stopped working. If a bunch as big as MS can fail in such an epic way that's a good sign to not be too dependant on date based software. Even if it's working perfectly local changes can make reality not match the database. When a school event is on a night or weekend the software is not going to be informed.
You appear to have been neglecting your studies in that area if your misconception of US-Indonesia relations is a reliable guide. BTW, what's with the climate change topic change distraction? Is that some debating trick you did recently in high school?
Slashdot Mirror
He made a fool of powerful "Horse Judges" promoted seven levels above their competence where they were caught out doing "a heck of a job", so he's been trapped in Moscow out of spite.
It's not "Russia" but a US resident who used to work in USSR intelligence, so it's a guess that needs to be taken with a bucketful of salt. It may be true in a stopped clock being right twice a day way but it's an opinion shouldn't be trusted without hearing from another source a bit closer to the action who may be able to offer something other than an opinion.
Here, have 5,340,000 of them you pathetic little trainee Beria.
http://www.google.com/search?q...
So that's five examples of that industrial that "never happens" so far. I suggest you stop this disgusting display of denial. Your teachers would be appalled at what appears to be the idea the history is the self-serving story as written by the victors and not the actual path to victory.
As for your link, is that some failed attempt to show off that you have actually read a book with long words in it some time in your life? It does not back up your argument about there being no industrial espionage and is a pretty flimsy justification at suggesting that it's all OK if it's government owned enterprises being spied on - which in some of these cases doesn't apply anyway (eg. a US law firm with an Indonesian tobacco company as a client). I find it very insulting that you are putting it forward as if I am unaware that most states have some involvement in private enterprise.
So the only mystery here is why are you misleading people on this website? What brings a person with a political "science" focus that appears to think the study of climate is no science to a technically orientated website to mislead the readers here? Can you answer that one?
If you'd tried a simple google search about the industrial espionage incident I mentioned then you would have found one of the many news articles (several from front pages) that mentioned it and would have not have produced such ridiculous rubbish as some of your assertions above.
As distinct from what - making shit up, denying reality and calling people who are aware of the world around them liars? It appears that you are taking a very childish attitude to the website and showing zero respect to the people who read it. I hope the "social media manipulator" gig pays well because you need some sort of recompense for being a useful little idiot.
I wish you were correct instead of overconfidently deluded.
Don't you see it as somewhat pathetic that due to blindly following a party line you have lost in a "history fight" to an engineer? Get your head out of the sand, stop relying on being spoon fed and look the world for yourself. That military history stuff you wanted to be spoon fed is in the fucking library and if not there are interlibrary loans, conference papers etc. A degree is supposed to teach you how to learn and not be an endpoint.
What the hell brings a guy that thinks "have you ever read political science" is some sort of insult to this place in the first place (I suspect I read a textbook on the topic thirty years before you were born although I never formally studied the topic and find it a bit depressing currently to be honest). Are you some sort of "social media" worker paid to stir up trouble? What's with the denial of items that were major news stories internationally? What is motivating you so much that you do not are that your are making yourself look incompetent in your chosen field of study? Is it Soviet style revisionism in the hope that somebody in The Party will give you a plum job as Commisar?
You didn't bother to link stuff to back up your assertions when you went as far as calling me a liar but I'm supposed to? Put aside those high school mass debating tricks and remember that you are supposed to be grown up now and have other resources at your disposal.
blockquote>nobody's willing to link to the actual evidence
Nobody? There was an inquiry and I helpfully named the prominent members for you above - providing the information of that for you directly instead of making you chase links everywhere.
Besides it's very clear that you are bluffing so I just have to state facts instead of convince someone who already knows about them but is pretending not to.
As I wrote, treading water :(
Hopefully that outlier will become a trend and hopefully it will take less than ten years while some electronics industry still exists in the USA to take up the work.
I gave you far more examples than you asked for but you just have petty excuses. Did you really study history? I seem to be doing better than you here as just an engineer that bothers to read a newspaper instead of ignoring the world.
Where is your apology for calling me a liar over the clove cigarette thing that was widely printed internationally? Your closest source is probably the New York Times since it's on their web page.
Pick a field outside of the military (or even inside the military with rocket engines coming from Russia) and it is a shambles, especially with computer and electronic equipment. Try getting something done with a "US" manufacturer when there is a holiday in China or a big snowstorm over there and you'll see exactly how much of a shambles it is. Not a complete failure but some stupid outsourcing choices have removed a competitive edge and some industries have to rely on government enforced trade barriers to survive at all. Personally I see it as due to seeing the ideal as people like Edsel Ford instead of Henry Ford - the cult of the specialist manager with no clue about what they are managing dropped into a "too big to fail" situation and seen as a success. Today even people like Donald Trump with a vastly negative net worth are seen as winners because they pinned the consequences of their multiple failures on others. You can't run things so badly without consequences, hence the slip to number two and a continued decline.
Once again, an example of my point. A concentration of industry and the designers having access to the process line/s makes a massive difference. Selling the farm to China, Mexico etc removes those advantages.
Co-ordinated from the other side of the planet - hence my point!
I'm sure I saw a BBC micro with an ARM chip in it some time before then.
That's why China already owns the USA's ass in manufacturing. There are too many holes in the manufacturing capability now while in China the place to make that other thing is just down the road - like it used to be in the USA.
How about Petrobras, Huawei and German communications companies then? Are Richard A. Clarke, Michael J. Morell, Geoffrey R. Stone, Cass R. Sunstein and Peter Swire wrong - yet you are somehow correct?
So you are calling me a lair just because you are ignorant of the subject matter?
That's not going to happen so long as Microsoft has a lot of pull in the game industry. It's a market dominance and agenda thing and not a technical thing.
Just pass the test the same way you could in 2000 and download the NVIDIA or AMD driver from their websites. If you want a dead simple answer without artificial restrictions that's all you have to do - instead of whining about how your artificial restriction is making things hard.
In fact such a post makes you look so stupid that I strongly suspect you have an agenda to push and do not care if you look stupid to many so long as you manage to fool the naive. Is that what is going on here?
Instead of just pushing out noise I suggest you use those google skills of yours and find that clove cigarette example I referred to so that you'll be informed in what you are writing about - among many other place it was in the New York Times FFS.
I'm getting the very strong impression that you think political "science" is a real science and the study of climate is not. Are you really that sort of person? If so, why are you bothering people here pushing your Party line on a site with an engineering and science focus?
Yes, but this is a physics article and not a science fiction one so there is both a speed limit and no Wookies available.
A couple of leap years back Zune's stopped working for a day and last time Azure stopped working. If a bunch as big as MS can fail in such an epic way that's a good sign to not be too dependant on date based software. Even if it's working perfectly local changes can make reality not match the database. When a school event is on a night or weekend the software is not going to be informed.
You appear to have been neglecting your studies in that area if your misconception of US-Indonesia relations is a reliable guide.
BTW, what's with the climate change topic change distraction? Is that some debating trick you did recently in high school?
If you know so little about this topic why are you arguing with me about it? Try reading a fucking newspaper kid.
You cannot count or pretending not to be able to - that is two examples so far in this thread alone.
Why is it "anti-American" to draw attention to out of control agencies being taken to task by less out of control portions of the State?