When you have no authority, you are in no position to tell anyone what to do. Management and HR are the ones with the authority.
Yes, it's rule quoted from a military officer as something to take in mind for anyone who wishes to act responsibly. Acting responsibly includes reporting unacceptable acts to people with authority of you have no influence on those events yourself (it should be obvious so why the excuse above?).
I should have looked at the name - it's fake engineer boy who denies fires and pretends the pentagon crash was faked - even Rand, who railed against the very heart of America, is less deranged than you.
as the other SJWs
Far too cowardly to use a real insult as well so you use code.
Having read a bit about them he was a thousand times the philosopher of "bring in the Russian nobility to replace Capitalism" Rand. She was living in a system many times better than the one she wanted, and railing against it. You guys should read a bit of European history to immunise yourself against vile shit like Rand.
I found a Forbes one from December 2015 before deciding that I was dancing to the tune of a annoying troll full of shit who is not going to care if I find proof of the obvious or not - since we are offtopic now anyway. Stratfor posting a clipping in 2015 that gets it right doesn't change that they were a clipping service.
Moore's Law wasn't a goal someone set and then did.
Actually it was. Moore set targets for development at Intel. The observation of a pace of technical advance came later and had to result in more of a "fuzzy" version of Moore's Law.
The idea that you would propose something like this, as if the proposal itself was actually accomplishing something, is asinine.
There is a lot of that about. At the G20 meeting a couple of years ago the "achievement" was proposing a couple of percent of economic growth.
I believe it's become inflammatory because men keep being told that it's their fault when another man is sexist.
The standard you walk past, is the standard you accept.
it's an HR and management failure.
Almost always but not always.
As for getting blamed for what others do when you were not even there, sucks, but you should have got used to that way back in school when your entire class was blamed for something one kid did.
at how prophetic Ayn Rand was with "Atlas Shrugged".
You need to get out more if you think that. Her screed on how fucked American Capitalism was compared with Russian Nobility was not prophetic it was about looking back at the dreams of a lost past. It was about how little jailbait Digby was born into the right class to fuck a "great man" and end up ruling over the serfs by right of bloodline. Anything that compares 1950s Hollywood to Communism (the dig at 20th Century Fox) is something should be considered as deranged. She saw 1950s America as badly broken. If you are going to get your politics from old SF at least read some good stuff like Heinlein.
Since I don't believe what you said about how no plane hit the Pentagon why should I believe your claims about "The rest is a fabrication based on repeated propaganda" now? You still appear to be full of shit you are just better at making it look credible via a bit of misdirection into areas outside of IT.
If you are so scared of a woman taking your job then maybe you should get better at doing it instead of wasting time trying to put them down.
Yes, this story is odd... almost if the "scandal" is ginned-up so as to generate Yet Another Story Of Workplace Sexism And Why Something MUST BE DONE NOW (And BTW, Trump Grabs Pussies).
It's just one more "Raising Awareness Moment" rammed into the eyeballs of the reader. Or a attempt to threaten a lawsuit and then settle.
There hasn't been a Friday night fight for a while - it looks like it's back. There used to be an article every week to inspire angry virgins to go around screaming SJW!!!!
I don't even know what the fuck the elders of Zion is
Look it up and you'll see why people think you are full of shit, because this "the weakings will take over the world" crap you were spouting has been done before. Even Henry Ford was pushing that turd, that's how high profile it was. You would have heard about it in school without even having to take history but you've forgotten. It's an extremely apt thing to remind yourself of now with all the "fake news" stuff floating about, since it was an incredible effective piece of fake news used as an excuse for a lot of things.
fucking stupid morons that think a political party is going to save them
I'm not one of those but from what you've written you appear to be parroting tea party shit so look very much like one of those fucking stupid morons that think a political party is going to save them - hence my accusation. Liberals did this, Jews did that, false flag fantasies - where the fuck are you getting this shit from if not from being force fed politics from the far side of crazy? Follow the money and follow the power. People don't get money or power by playing the victim and pretending to bomb their own place of worship.
The largest international press corporation on the planet not enough for you? You have no case. Strafor had plenty of places to clip from at the time. I really don't get why you are so enamored of a small company that appeared to be no good at anything other than self promotion. They made a massive fuss about their security but then got easily and spectacularly hacked.
Nice try at reality denial, but experts know more than laymen. Are you really so shit at what you do that you think everyone else is just as good at what you do? No? Then have you thought that other professionals may be better at what they do than others who have never attempted to do their jobs?
Playing head games with people who can beat you up without consequence if you frustrate them - not clever. Things are a bit different to the movies here kiddies. It's time to pay attention to policing lessons from the third world because those rights you thought you had vanish in dark places.
The meaning of "virtue signalling" has never been unclear
Like "SJW" it appears to be used most often as an insult by people who are too cowardly to use a real one than actually meaning anything specific. Thus not just unclear but totally opaque and annoying as fuck.
Considering you used that pointless little alt-right phrase you are either in the broadcaster, recipient or collatoral damage category, so they would expect you to sign up with your dollars - or at least send a vast amount of advertising targeting you.
Can we please get back to English instead of weird shit like "virtue signaling" where it's unclear whether its mention means an insult, irony or a quest for a "look at me" award?
ISIL/Daash may want it pretend they do but ISIL is not actually running a country. They are one of the smaller rebel groups in Syria and Iraq. Being in the same area as a thinly spread bunch of criminals does not also make you are criminal, especially if you are one of the people actively fighting these criminals, such as the Kurdish groups that we provide military aid to. Those are the sort of people who will be visiting the USA and they are the sort of people who have already had a lot of problems with travel bans. Did you miss the disputes where the Pentagon had to get involved over the first travel ban? It was over people who were working for them from the same areas covered by this new bit of security theatre.
I doubt it. This is just another example of "something must be done" - spinning wheels to show that there is action but not actually going anywhere. It's just going to piss off a lot of people and make Bin Laden's ghost laugh at how even the people who like the USA enough to actually want to visit are being encouraged to hate it by little Hitlers on border duty.
Load them up with tantalizing information that wastes a ton of investigation time
Maybe not. Your time gets wasted a lot as well answering questions. As an (old) example Steve Jackson Games employees had a lot of trouble over the "GURPS Cyberpunk" game rules after a Secret Service raid despite it being extremely obvious fantasy/SF (1990, so the computer you are using today would have been wild SF let alone cyberpunk stuff). http://www.sjgames.com/SS/ Your obvious fabrication, selectively quoted, could end up resulting in serious prison time for you if it looks like somebody can get a promotion for catching conspiritators.
Thinking about it as if you are going to be dealing with an ideal justice system is probably a very bad idea. I'd say expect less comic book more Kafka (or similar eastern european writer describing a corrupt justice system).
It appears that you are projecting your own dark fantasies onto a strawman of a conveniently different political team for the one you are cheering hard for. Reality is far more mundane than your id with all the safeties off. All that protocols of the elders of Zion shit you are spouting isn't likely to be anywhere near as true now as it was in the 1920s. False flag stuff? WTF is wrong with your head? Is reality really so boring that you have to project conspiracies about how the weakest in society are controlling the fuck out of everything? Isn't a billionaire in the White House enough of a reality check for you?
This would not be like the Italian mob where their presence was known and their ability to avoid prosecution was a thorn in the side of law enforcement
That was due to a single problem that was skirted around by such complicated things as odd new laws. Hoover. The dirty little secret about why the IRS took down Capone is because they were the agency he did not bribe.
You're welcome to cite some of those sources that said the same thing before Sep 2015
1/ A large number of very vocal Bernie supporters. 2/ A very large number of Trump supporters. 3/ Any media outlet that reported what those supporters said, among reporting other things. Strafor would have clipped those articles. 4/ Fox news and the Murdoch press in general who were pushing for Trump early on.
Even the London (UK) Times and "The Australian" were reporting on Trump and Sanders in mid 2015.
We do. It turns out that the term is used for two different things and this is the atmospheric physics use of the term instead of the gravitational physics use.
People used to think that, so Concorde was built, but it turned out that not very many people thought speed was enough of a problem to actually pay for it. London to Paris is less than 350 kilometres. Even a plane flying at 350 kilometres per hour or a bit less is going to take less time getting from one to the other than driving a car across either of those cities.
Yes, it's rule quoted from a military officer as something to take in mind for anyone who wishes to act responsibly.
Acting responsibly includes reporting unacceptable acts to people with authority of you have no influence on those events yourself (it should be obvious so why the excuse above?).
Far too cowardly to use a real insult as well so you use code.
Having read a bit about them he was a thousand times the philosopher of "bring in the Russian nobility to replace Capitalism" Rand. She was living in a system many times better than the one she wanted, and railing against it. You guys should read a bit of European history to immunise yourself against vile shit like Rand.
I found a Forbes one from December 2015 before deciding that I was dancing to the tune of a annoying troll full of shit who is not going to care if I find proof of the obvious or not - since we are offtopic now anyway. Stratfor posting a clipping in 2015 that gets it right doesn't change that they were a clipping service.
Actually it was. Moore set targets for development at Intel. The observation of a pace of technical advance came later and had to result in more of a "fuzzy" version of Moore's Law.
There is a lot of that about. At the G20 meeting a couple of years ago the "achievement" was proposing a couple of percent of economic growth.
The standard you walk past, is the standard you accept.
Almost always but not always.
As for getting blamed for what others do when you were not even there, sucks, but you should have got used to that way back in school when your entire class was blamed for something one kid did.
You need to get out more if you think that. Her screed on how fucked American Capitalism was compared with Russian Nobility was not prophetic it was about looking back at the dreams of a lost past. It was about how little jailbait Digby was born into the right class to fuck a "great man" and end up ruling over the serfs by right of bloodline.
Anything that compares 1950s Hollywood to Communism (the dig at 20th Century Fox) is something should be considered as deranged. She saw 1950s America as badly broken.
If you are going to get your politics from old SF at least read some good stuff like Heinlein.
When the promotions or layoffs happen everyone cares.
Since I don't believe what you said about how no plane hit the Pentagon why should I believe your claims about "The rest is a fabrication based on repeated propaganda" now?
You still appear to be full of shit you are just better at making it look credible via a bit of misdirection into areas outside of IT.
If you are so scared of a woman taking your job then maybe you should get better at doing it instead of wasting time trying to put them down.
Yes, this story is odd... almost if the "scandal" is ginned-up so as to generate Yet Another Story Of Workplace Sexism And Why Something MUST BE DONE NOW (And BTW, Trump Grabs Pussies). It's just one more "Raising Awareness Moment" rammed into the eyeballs of the reader. Or a attempt to threaten a lawsuit and then settle.
There hasn't been a Friday night fight for a while - it looks like it's back.
There used to be an article every week to inspire angry virgins to go around screaming SJW!!!!
Look it up and you'll see why people think you are full of shit, because this "the weakings will take over the world" crap you were spouting has been done before. Even Henry Ford was pushing that turd, that's how high profile it was. You would have heard about it in school without even having to take history but you've forgotten. It's an extremely apt thing to remind yourself of now with all the "fake news" stuff floating about, since it was an incredible effective piece of fake news used as an excuse for a lot of things.
I'm not one of those but from what you've written you appear to be parroting tea party shit so look very much like one of those fucking stupid morons that think a political party is going to save them - hence my accusation. Liberals did this, Jews did that, false flag fantasies - where the fuck are you getting this shit from if not from being force fed politics from the far side of crazy? Follow the money and follow the power. People don't get money or power by playing the victim and pretending to bomb their own place of worship.
The largest international press corporation on the planet not enough for you? You have no case. Strafor had plenty of places to clip from at the time.
I really don't get why you are so enamored of a small company that appeared to be no good at anything other than self promotion. They made a massive fuss about their security but then got easily and spectacularly hacked.
Nice try at reality denial, but experts know more than laymen.
Are you really so shit at what you do that you think everyone else is just as good at what you do? No? Then have you thought that other professionals may be better at what they do than others who have never attempted to do their jobs?
Playing head games with people who can beat you up without consequence if you frustrate them - not clever.
Things are a bit different to the movies here kiddies. It's time to pay attention to policing lessons from the third world because those rights you thought you had vanish in dark places.
Like "SJW" it appears to be used most often as an insult by people who are too cowardly to use a real one than actually meaning anything specific.
Thus not just unclear but totally opaque and annoying as fuck.
Considering you used that pointless little alt-right phrase you are either in the broadcaster, recipient or collatoral damage category, so they would expect you to sign up with your dollars - or at least send a vast amount of advertising targeting you.
Can we please get back to English instead of weird shit like "virtue signaling" where it's unclear whether its mention means an insult, irony or a quest for a "look at me" award?
ISIL/Daash may want it pretend they do but ISIL is not actually running a country. They are one of the smaller rebel groups in Syria and Iraq. Being in the same area as a thinly spread bunch of criminals does not also make you are criminal, especially if you are one of the people actively fighting these criminals, such as the Kurdish groups that we provide military aid to. Those are the sort of people who will be visiting the USA and they are the sort of people who have already had a lot of problems with travel bans. Did you miss the disputes where the Pentagon had to get involved over the first travel ban? It was over people who were working for them from the same areas covered by this new bit of security theatre.
I doubt it. This is just another example of "something must be done" - spinning wheels to show that there is action but not actually going anywhere.
It's just going to piss off a lot of people and make Bin Laden's ghost laugh at how even the people who like the USA enough to actually want to visit are being encouraged to hate it by little Hitlers on border duty.
Maybe not.
Your time gets wasted a lot as well answering questions.
As an (old) example Steve Jackson Games employees had a lot of trouble over the "GURPS Cyberpunk" game rules after a Secret Service raid despite it being extremely obvious fantasy/SF (1990, so the computer you are using today would have been wild SF let alone cyberpunk stuff).
http://www.sjgames.com/SS/
Your obvious fabrication, selectively quoted, could end up resulting in serious prison time for you if it looks like somebody can get a promotion for catching conspiritators.
Thinking about it as if you are going to be dealing with an ideal justice system is probably a very bad idea. I'd say expect less comic book more Kafka (or similar eastern european writer describing a corrupt justice system).
It appears that you are projecting your own dark fantasies onto a strawman of a conveniently different political team for the one you are cheering hard for. Reality is far more mundane than your id with all the safeties off.
All that protocols of the elders of Zion shit you are spouting isn't likely to be anywhere near as true now as it was in the 1920s. False flag stuff? WTF is wrong with your head? Is reality really so boring that you have to project conspiracies about how the weakest in society are controlling the fuck out of everything? Isn't a billionaire in the White House enough of a reality check for you?
So sorry, not funny and nowhere near plausible.
That was due to a single problem that was skirted around by such complicated things as odd new laws. Hoover.
The dirty little secret about why the IRS took down Capone is because they were the agency he did not bribe.
1/ A large number of very vocal Bernie supporters.
2/ A very large number of Trump supporters.
3/ Any media outlet that reported what those supporters said, among reporting other things. Strafor would have clipped those articles.
4/ Fox news and the Murdoch press in general who were pushing for Trump early on.
Even the London (UK) Times and "The Australian" were reporting on Trump and Sanders in mid 2015.
We do. It turns out that the term is used for two different things and this is the atmospheric physics use of the term instead of the gravitational physics use.
Especially because cars still have problems to cross at least 20 miles of sea, and a bridge does not exist.
Twenty miles of sea inside Paris? That's in-Seine.
People used to think that, so Concorde was built, but it turned out that not very many people thought speed was enough of a problem to actually pay for it.
London to Paris is less than 350 kilometres.
Even a plane flying at 350 kilometres per hour or a bit less is going to take less time getting from one to the other than driving a car across either of those cities.