The only reason humans can use speech to effciently communicate with each other is that along with speech comes tone, body language, and symantic context that conveys as much (if not more) information than the vocal message itself. Computers cannot pick up on those kinds of things.
Boddy language.. well that rules the common phone out as an effective communication medium.
There are so many flavors of unix out there that it is hard to find a flaw that is exploitable accross all/majority of them(unlike the M$ software which is often based on the same code NT/2000/XP etc ). At the kernel level anyway.
Both approaches have pros and cons. It appears the unix approach is working for virus/worm attacks. Reminds me of natural selection. Unix has many different flavors and thus survives a virus. Microsoft does not, and thus a successful virus can wipe it out the entire species.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm very sick and tired of changing my name each time Intel decides that they need a new processor...
your an idiot
(notwithstanding *BAD* predictions like flying cars and meal-in-a-pill).
Obviously they go the nano bots working faster on the Jetsons.
Hey... I have had many ladies say i was satifying.
so her best option is to kill her parents.
8 hours...
Wait till bill finds out your only working 8 hours.
The only reason humans can use speech to effciently communicate with each other is that along with speech comes tone, body language, and symantic context that conveys as much (if not more) information than the vocal message itself. Computers cannot pick up on those kinds of things. Boddy language.. well that rules the common phone out as an effective communication medium.
Bill Gates is so a geek.. he has dandruff and everything.
>> costs, MS recycles *massive* ammounts of code and shoehorns that code into new roles
are we talking component, or copy and paste reuse?
remind me not to... ahh shutup already
remind me not to employ you at my employment department
remind me not to employ you at my marketing department
remind me not to employ you at my r&d department
There are so many flavors of unix out there that it is hard to find a flaw that is exploitable accross all/majority of them(unlike the M$ software which is often based on the same code NT/2000/XP etc ). At the kernel level anyway.
Both approaches have pros and cons. It appears the unix approach is working for virus/worm attacks. Reminds me of natural selection. Unix has many different flavors and thus survives a virus. Microsoft does not, and thus a successful virus can wipe it out the entire species.