And if the general finds himself unable to leave his armchair for the mission (dinner coming, a scheduled masturbation marathon), the United States will find some actual military type person to do the getting?
The pope has the infallibility thing, in which he tells us when he's infallible, so we don't go confusing his regular fallible musings.
How about Clapper? When do we know he's telling the truth? Could he not wear some kind of special hat on the rare occasions when he's speaking truthfully on matters of great import? I'd suggest he wink when he's not telling the truth, but he'd be winking so often during congressional hearings he'd seem to be having a stroke.
Sure, and everything else is free because you can do the initial paperwork and annual filings yourself. If issues arise from an amateur completing complex IRS forms, you can also represent yourself in court. Any spare time remaining can be devoted to DIY dentistry and rerouting the local gas main so you can run a barbecue in your bathroom.
I was involved in a website that formed a foundation to manage the site, and the only reason it remained fairly cheap was because a tax attorney kindly volunteered his time, and asked only that basic expenses be covered during founding and when handling the annual requirements of holding the LLC.
My Administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in your personal data. We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration. Openness will strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in the wars on terror, copyright violation and whistleblowing.
Your personal data should be transparent. Transparency promotes accountability and provides information for Government about what their subjects are doing. Information maintained by the Federal Government is a national asset. My Administration will take appropriate action, consistent with law and policy, to obtain your information rapidly in forms that the NSA and similar agencies can readily find and use. Executive departments and agencies should harness new technologies to put information about your operations and decisions online and readily available to the NSA. Executive departments and agencies should also solicit public feedback from ex White House staffers and former CIA leadership to identify information of greatest use to the Government.
Government should be participatory, but isn't. Public engagement damages the Government's effectiveness and impairs the quality of its decisions. Knowledge is widely dispersed in society, and my friends benefit from having access to that dispersed knowledge. Executive departments and agencies should offer my friends and ex-agency people to participate in policymaking and to provide their Government with the benefits of their collective expertise and information. Executive departments and agencies should also solicit public input on how we can increase and improve opportunities for public participation in Government.
Government surveillance should be collaborative, as it was in the former German Democratic Republic. Collaboration actively engages Americans in the work of their Government. Executive departments and agencies should use innovative tools, secret courts, and systems to cooperate among themselves, across all levels of Government, and with nonprofit organizations, businesses, and individuals in the private sector. Executive departments and agencies should solicit feedback the NSA to assess and improve your level of collaboration and to identify new opportunities for incarceration.
I direct the Chief Technology Officer, in coordination with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Administrator of General Services, to obtain for me naked pictures of your mother and the last 30 days of emails you've sent and received, not because it serves any useful purpose, but because I can and will know your every secret.
This memorandum is not intended to be honest or in any way representative of my administration's views on seeing your holiday photos and the drunken SMS conversation you had last Tuesday with your ex-wife.
This memorandum shall be published in the Federal Register. Sleep well, loyal subject, for I stand guard against all the terrible things that could befall you. All I ask is that you trust me.
He knows he doesn't have to give a shit. He could be caught with a dead intern in his office, and a bloodstained knife in his hand. He could have his wife and the Boston strangler handle the investigation, except of course if he had fucked the intern, in which case shit would get serious.
I'm not sure what cognitive fault causes people to blame the victim, but it seems like a common thought process.
It's a disturbingly common thought process that is most disturbingly used in sex-related instances, such as unplanned pregnancy and sexual assault.
People don't want to accept that bad things can happen pretty randomly to good and well prepared people, so it's more comforting to assume the just world hypothesis. People get what they deserve, and as I'm a good person I'll surely be safer.
Used to posting as AC, all my formatting was lost, hence the wall of text. internet n00b in 2013 FTW?
Heh heh. You just arrived from AOL?
I get your power-line story. I agree there shouldn't be a sense of self-entitlement for doing the right thing. To continue with that story, what Yahoo did would be comparable to the electrical company swinging by your place afterwards with a voucher entitling you to pay 5 dollars to come ride in the van on their way back to the depot. Where there's no budget for a decent reward, it's better to go with either a polite thanks. Yahoo provided a reward that requires the recipient, if they wish to collect, to pay money to buy a t-shirt that few people this side of 1998 would want.
Recycling email addresses is a great time saver. It saved me the hassle of getting myself on spam and porn lists. If not for Yahoo's decision my grandmother would never have discovered the delights of European bestiality. It also meant I didn't have to go making accounts on other services, as I just waiting for newsletters and other mailings to come through so I could use them to reset the passwords of the prior owner.
Top notch idea! I wish Yahoo would make a computer. I know they'd add useful features, such as the "decrypt hard drive" button on the back for those awkward moments when someone has files I really need to see.
I don't think he loves Muslims. He's just a self-serving man who seems to have a pathological need to always take the opposing view of any positions the UK and US governments hold. There's a wealth of weirdness there, with his hard-on for Islam being married with his support for gay rights and his automatic and unyielding support for any regime run by arabs and/or Muslims. He's an apologist for butchers - so long as they're arabs or Muslims - even when these odious regimes are persecuting muslims and the many and often mutually exclusive groups he purports to champion.
He is everything that's wrong with the European left-wing. A conceited opportunistic contrarian. He is only electable among Muslims and other minorities who appreciate Lawrence of Bradford's kind words to them. They sure as hell don't elect him to represent their interests in the House of Commons, as he's barely fucking there. Instead he prefers to be out on the streets giving rousing speeches to his fans.
Are binaries built for any given BSD going to work on any other BSD? e.g. binaries from OpenBSD working in FreeBSD? How about differing processor architectures?
You're generally looking at compiling for target platforms. Where there is binary compatibility (such as OpenBSD providing FreeBSD binary compatibility) you're probably looking to include the expected FreeBSD libraries. Where possible, it's cleaner to compile for the intended target.
FISA Court Will Release More Opinions Because of Snowden?
Nope. Any releases will be made as part of the administration's drive to increase transparency while retaining the tools needed to protect against the terrorists. It's not coming because of public pressure or legal challenges. No siree, not like last time:
This time they'll be truthy. We can be certain of course that this information would have been released even if Snowden hadn't kicked-off this shit-storm. After all, isn't this the most transparent administration, with unprecedented levels of openness? Must be true - it says it on the White House site:
Committed a crime against humanity and could use some support? Are you a mass murderer willing to pay for some publicity whore of a soulless cunt to shake your hand while telling the world of your indefatigability? Are you sickened by discrimination against people who want to kill jews in a hail of shrapnel on a crowded bus?
Yes to any of the above? You need George Galloway. Mr Galloway has over 10 years experience of representing his interests in elected office. Remember our catchy jingle! "If the cheque clears and you're not a Jew, there's no end of things George can do for you!"
Duty free shop, strong alkihole (rum burns!), a rag...and you got yourself a molotov cocktail... wonder if the smoke detectors in lavatory would ring when someone tries to light half a dozen of those and smash'em all over the airplane. Maybe not absolutely catastrophic, but enough to cause a huge news fuss, suspicion of anyone buying drinks, and perhaps banning selling of alcohol:-)
This is why there are limits on the types of alcohol that can be brought aboard planes. You won't find high proof alcohol available for sale in duty free shops. Bringing in a bottle from the outside would be fiddly, and I know they confiscate stuff above a certain proof.
You can test this yourself. Go buy a selection of booze in the duty free store and bring it home to turn in to Molotov cocktails. You'd probably have to heat the vodka to get it anywhere near ignition, and that would be pretty difficult to do on an airplane.
Slashdot Mirror
And if the general finds himself unable to leave his armchair for the mission (dinner coming, a scheduled masturbation marathon), the United States will find some actual military type person to do the getting?
The pope has the infallibility thing, in which he tells us when he's infallible, so we don't go confusing his regular fallible musings.
How about Clapper? When do we know he's telling the truth? Could he not wear some kind of special hat on the rare occasions when he's speaking truthfully on matters of great import? I'd suggest he wink when he's not telling the truth, but he'd be winking so often during congressional hearings he'd seem to be having a stroke.
Sure, and everything else is free because you can do the initial paperwork and annual filings yourself. If issues arise from an amateur completing complex IRS forms, you can also represent yourself in court. Any spare time remaining can be devoted to DIY dentistry and rerouting the local gas main so you can run a barbecue in your bathroom.
I was involved in a website that formed a foundation to manage the site, and the only reason it remained fairly cheap was because a tax attorney kindly volunteered his time, and asked only that basic expenses be covered during founding and when handling the annual requirements of holding the LLC.
Did you miss the White House memo on transparency?
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment
My Administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in your personal data. We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration. Openness will strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in the wars on terror, copyright violation and whistleblowing.
Your personal data should be transparent. Transparency promotes accountability and provides information for Government about what their subjects are doing. Information maintained by the Federal Government is a national asset. My Administration will take appropriate action, consistent with law and policy, to obtain your information rapidly in forms that the NSA and similar agencies can readily find and use. Executive departments and agencies should harness new technologies to put information about your operations and decisions online and readily available to the NSA. Executive departments and agencies should also solicit public feedback from ex White House staffers and former CIA leadership to identify information of greatest use to the Government.
Government should be participatory, but isn't. Public engagement damages the Government's effectiveness and impairs the quality of its decisions. Knowledge is widely dispersed in society, and my friends benefit from having access to that dispersed knowledge. Executive departments and agencies should offer my friends and ex-agency people to participate in policymaking and to provide their Government with the benefits of their collective expertise and information. Executive departments and agencies should also solicit public input on how we can increase and improve opportunities for public participation in Government.
Government surveillance should be collaborative, as it was in the former German Democratic Republic. Collaboration actively engages Americans in the work of their Government. Executive departments and agencies should use innovative tools, secret courts, and systems to cooperate among themselves, across all levels of Government, and with nonprofit organizations, businesses, and individuals in the private sector. Executive departments and agencies should solicit feedback the NSA to assess and improve your level of collaboration and to identify new opportunities for incarceration.
I direct the Chief Technology Officer, in coordination with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Administrator of General Services, to obtain for me naked pictures of your mother and the last 30 days of emails you've sent and received, not because it serves any useful purpose, but because I can and will know your every secret.
This memorandum is not intended to be honest or in any way representative of my administration's views on seeing your holiday photos and the drunken SMS conversation you had last Tuesday with your ex-wife.
This memorandum shall be published in the Federal Register. Sleep well, loyal subject, for I stand guard against all the terrible things that could befall you. All I ask is that you trust me.
BARACK OBAMA
Cheers, sir/madam.
He knows he doesn't have to give a shit. He could be caught with a dead intern in his office, and a bloodstained knife in his hand. He could have his wife and the Boston strangler handle the investigation, except of course if he had fucked the intern, in which case shit would get serious.
Motörhead
Will the umlaut survive posting?
I'm not sure what cognitive fault causes people to blame the victim, but it seems like a common thought process.
It's a disturbingly common thought process that is most disturbingly used in sex-related instances, such as unplanned pregnancy and sexual assault.
People don't want to accept that bad things can happen pretty randomly to good and well prepared people, so it's more comforting to assume the just world hypothesis. People get what they deserve, and as I'm a good person I'll surely be safer.
Used to posting as AC, all my formatting was lost, hence the wall of text. internet n00b in 2013 FTW?
Heh heh. You just arrived from AOL?
I get your power-line story. I agree there shouldn't be a sense of self-entitlement for doing the right thing. To continue with that story, what Yahoo did would be comparable to the electrical company swinging by your place afterwards with a voucher entitling you to pay 5 dollars to come ride in the van on their way back to the depot. Where there's no budget for a decent reward, it's better to go with either a polite thanks. Yahoo provided a reward that requires the recipient, if they wish to collect, to pay money to buy a t-shirt that few people this side of 1998 would want.
Recycling email addresses is a great time saver. It saved me the hassle of getting myself on spam and porn lists. If not for Yahoo's decision my grandmother would never have discovered the delights of European bestiality. It also meant I didn't have to go making accounts on other services, as I just waiting for newsletters and other mailings to come through so I could use them to reset the passwords of the prior owner.
Top notch idea! I wish Yahoo would make a computer. I know they'd add useful features, such as the "decrypt hard drive" button on the back for those awkward moments when someone has files I really need to see.
Correction: Mr Galloway is actually now spending some time in Parliament. Nice of him to do his day job when he's no swanning around the world.
Your mum
I don't think he loves Muslims. He's just a self-serving man who seems to have a pathological need to always take the opposing view of any positions the UK and US governments hold. There's a wealth of weirdness there, with his hard-on for Islam being married with his support for gay rights and his automatic and unyielding support for any regime run by arabs and/or Muslims. He's an apologist for butchers - so long as they're arabs or Muslims - even when these odious regimes are persecuting muslims and the many and often mutually exclusive groups he purports to champion.
He is everything that's wrong with the European left-wing. A conceited opportunistic contrarian. He is only electable among Muslims and other minorities who appreciate Lawrence of Bradford's kind words to them. They sure as hell don't elect him to represent their interests in the House of Commons, as he's barely fucking there. Instead he prefers to be out on the streets giving rousing speeches to his fans.
Are binaries built for any given BSD going to work on any other BSD? e.g. binaries from OpenBSD working in FreeBSD? How about differing processor architectures?
You're generally looking at compiling for target platforms. Where there is binary compatibility (such as OpenBSD providing FreeBSD binary compatibility) you're probably looking to include the expected FreeBSD libraries. Where possible, it's cleaner to compile for the intended target.
FISA Court Will Release More Opinions Because of Snowden?
Nope. Any releases will be made as part of the administration's drive to increase transparency while retaining the tools needed to protect against the terrorists. It's not coming because of public pressure or legal challenges. No siree, not like last time:
https://www.eff.org/mention/obama-administration-dishonestly-wants-public-believe-it-voluntarily-declassified-secret-nsa
This time they'll be truthy. We can be certain of course that this information would have been released even if Snowden hadn't kicked-off this shit-storm. After all, isn't this the most transparent administration, with unprecedented levels of openness? Must be true - it says it on the White House site:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment
Nope, but the king's horses tried their best.
Spain? When was the last time you looked at a map?
Police can be bought at any of these fine websites:
http://www.conservatives.com/
http://www.labour.org.uk/
http://www.libdems.org.uk/
Committed a crime against humanity and could use some support? Are you a mass murderer willing to pay for some publicity whore of a soulless cunt to shake your hand while telling the world of your indefatigability? Are you sickened by discrimination against people who want to kill jews in a hail of shrapnel on a crowded bus?
Yes to any of the above? You need George Galloway. Mr Galloway has over 10 years experience of representing his interests in elected office. Remember our catchy jingle! "If the cheque clears and you're not a Jew, there's no end of things George can do for you!"
http://www.votegeorgegalloway.com/
Shush. There's nothing foodie about insisting that all fruit be cut with a silver knife that was bathed in the light of a waning moon.
I ate a Burger King burger and literally exploded!
I got better.
To me it sounds dated and hackneyed; like asking "do you surf the information superhighway?" Just a personal irk.
I'd trust him as far as I could throw him, and after carrying a large fold-out bed through town, that is not very far at all.
That's terrorist talk!
Duty free shop, strong alkihole (rum burns!), a rag...and you got yourself a molotov cocktail... wonder if the smoke detectors in lavatory would ring when someone tries to light half a dozen of those and smash'em all over the airplane. Maybe not absolutely catastrophic, but enough to cause a huge news fuss, suspicion of anyone buying drinks, and perhaps banning selling of alcohol :-)
This is why there are limits on the types of alcohol that can be brought aboard planes. You won't find high proof alcohol available for sale in duty free shops. Bringing in a bottle from the outside would be fiddly, and I know they confiscate stuff above a certain proof.
You can test this yourself. Go buy a selection of booze in the duty free store and bring it home to turn in to Molotov cocktails. You'd probably have to heat the vodka to get it anywhere near ignition, and that would be pretty difficult to do on an airplane.
Does having my junk patted down count as sex? If so, then I suppose I've had sex with a few TSA agents.
Snowden didn't commit treason either. In 1945 the Supreme Court ruled that treason requires adhering to a specific enemy, which neither of them did.
I'm sure Obama would argue that Snowden has sided with Terror(TM). Is that specific enough for you?